Re: Changing font for message list

2009-12-31 Thread MFPA
Hi

On Wednesday 30 December 2009 at 10:37:39 PM, in
mid:662687134.20091230143...@gmail.com, Susanne wrote:


  

 Hi,

 Wednesday, December 30, 2009, 12:42:36
 PM,expires2...@ymail.com wrote:

  And whatever text or background settings you choose,
 an HTML mail can over-ride them - some messages
 specify either the text colour or background colour
 but not both, so you can end up with invisible text...

 Ah, thanks!

 It seems everything html has a glaring white
 background, while I have the text message background
 color set as grey, so maybe it's being overridden, or
 4.2 is different.


Here (in 4.0.38), I have white text on a black background. Many HTML
messages over-ride one or both of these defaults but I only look at
the HTML if the plaintext version doesn't show me the message.


-- 
Best regards
 
MFPA

Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.

Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600  



Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: TB! and Windows 7 UAC

2009-12-31 Thread Raymund Tump
Hi Cesar,

 Thanks  for  your  message.  That's  the problem. I give my permission
 every  time TB! starts.

Try the following: Find The Bat! in the Program Files directory, right
click it and go to the compatibility tab. Check Run as Administrator.

 However,  if  I  lower the warnings level from UAC (no warning, lowest
 level), nothing bothers me anymore.

Well, to run the computer with an administrative account and turning
off UAC is a very, very bad idea. That would open the door for more
malwares like the one you got from that iPhone website :-)

 I  should  probably  do  that because as I read before from friends at
 TBUDL, UAC wouldn't help so much with security issues.

Well, security wise it is always a good idea to run with the least
possible privileges. So create a restricted user and if you need to
install something make sure you scan it first for virus and malware
and then install it using the administrative account that was created
during the setup of the computer.

-- 
Regards,
Raymund



Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: TB! and Windows 7 UAC

2009-12-31 Thread Cesar Santos
Hello Raymund,

Thursday, December 31, 2009, 2:10:04 PM, you wrote:

 Try the following: Find The Bat! in the Program Files directory, right
 click it and go to the compatibility tab. Check Run as Administrator.

Thanks   for  your  message.  Your  suggestion,  even  running  TB  as
Administrator, the program prompts asking for permission to access the
HD  and  to  commit  changes  on it. I tried different levels from UAC
vertical cursor. It only works without restriction if used with no UAC
restrictions (UAC cursor down).

According  to Danger and an article I read about UAC it really doesn't
provide enough security as I was thinking before. Anyway Kaspersky had
picked  up  the  Trojan and eliminated it. I think that whenever I try
again searching for information from Google I should do it using Linux
that, somehow, looks to have better means of protection.

Thanks for your time!

-- 
Best regards,
 Cesarmailto:tij...@gmail.com



Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: TB! and Windows 7 UAC [now veering OT]

2009-12-31 Thread MFPA
Hi

On Thursday 31 December 2009 at 4:59:11 PM, in
mid:1078363130.20091231145...@gmail.com, Cesar Santos wrote:


 I think that whenever I try again searching for information from
 Google I should do it using Linux that, somehow, looks to have
 better means of protection.

Does Linux really have better means of protection, or is it simply 
targeted by fewer malware writers because it has fewer users?



-- 
Best regards
 
MFPA

The second mouse gets the cheese

Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600  



Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: TB! and Windows 7 UAC [now veering OT]

2009-12-31 Thread Cesar Santos
Hello MFPA,

Thursday, December 31, 2009, 3:42:49 PM, you wrote:

 Does Linux really have better means of protection, or is it simply 
 targeted by fewer malware writers because it has fewer users?

Both, I think ;-)

-- 
Best regards,
 Cesarmailto:tij...@gmail.com



Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: TB! and Windows 7 UAC [now veering OT]

2009-12-31 Thread Danger
Hello MFPA,

Thursday, December 31, 2009, 12:42:49 PM, you wrote:

 Hi

 On Thursday 31 December 2009 at 4:59:11 PM, in
 mid:1078363130.20091231145...@gmail.com, Cesar Santos wrote:


 I think that whenever I try again searching for information from
 Google I should do it using Linux that, somehow, looks to have
 better means of protection.

 Does Linux really have better means of protection, or is it simply 
 targeted by fewer malware writers because it has fewer users?



Both!  Security Issues are taken very seriously and patched as soon as
they  are  found.  Having  the  source code makes it possible for many
people to tackle the issue at once. Also usually it is easy to contact
the package maintainers.


-- 
Best regards,
 Dangermailto:dan...@bway.net




Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html