Problems with %TO: macro in a reply template.
Hi all, I'm trying to set a reply template in a create automatic reply filter, with these two instructions: %TO= %TO=[EMAIL PROTECTED] This creates a reply with no To: field. AFAIK, TB is not supposed to do that. If my reply template contains just %TO=[EMAIL PROTECTED] it creates a reply with a To: field containing two addresses, as it's supposed to do: TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's going wrong? It's me or is it my TB Home 3.51.10? Thanx for any help. -- Luca -- Luca - e-mail: p.stevens at libero.it Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problems with %TO: macro in a reply template.
Create new MSG, not Create automatic reply. -- OttY 2005/9/22, Luca [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all, I'm trying to set a reply template in a create automatic reply filter, with these two instructions: %TO= %TO=[EMAIL PROTECTED] This creates a reply with no To: field. AFAIK, TB is not supposed to do that. If my reply template contains just %TO=[EMAIL PROTECTED] it creates a reply with a To: field containing two addresses, as it's supposed to do: TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's going wrong? It's me or is it my TB Home 3.51.10? Thanx for any help. -- Luca -- Luca - e-mail: p.stevens at libero.it Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problems with %TO: macro in a reply template.
Oto Ziak: 2005/9/22, Luca [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm trying to set a reply template in a create automatic reply filter, with these two instructions: %TO= %TO=[EMAIL PROTECTED] This creates a reply with no To: field. AFAIK, TB is not supposed to do that. Create new MSG, not Create automatic reply. Er ... no. I need a true reply. The above is just an example, to make things more simple here. The real filter would include a regexp in place of address of mine, to pick addresses from the original message I want TB to reply to. I think the above example is valid, and it seems to show a bug in TB. Can anyone confirm? -- Luca - e-mail: p.stevens at libero.it Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problems with %TO: macro in a reply template.
IMHO, it is not TB bug. Reply is reply to original address and you can't erase it from new header. You can you create new msg and place into msg body original body transformed by regexp. It is only my idea. -- OttY 2005/9/22, Luca [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think the above example is valid, and it seems to show a bug in TB. Can anyone confirm? Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problems with %TO: macro in a reply template.
Hello Luca, I think the above example is valid, and it seems to show a bug in TB. Can anyone confirm? confirmed with create automatic reply filter. With a normal reply template it work as expected. -- Best regards Miroslav BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu News-Ticker: http://thebat.zetema.de/bat-mail.xml Klipfolio Klip: http://thebat.zetema.de/klipfolio Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problems with %TO: macro in a reply template.
Hallo Luca, On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:26:29 +0200GMT (22-9-2005, 14:26 +0200, where I live), you wrote: L I'm trying to set a reply template in a create automatic reply filter, with L these two instructions: L %TO= L %TO=[EMAIL PROTECTED] L This creates a reply with no To: field. AFAIK, TB is not supposed to do L that. Is a known bug. http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4933 in bugtrack. You could try to drop both %To= macros and replace them with %SetHeader(To,[EMAIL PROTECTED]) For most that helps, though I remember one case that it didn't. L -- Your signature delimiter doesn't work. -- Groetjes, Roelof Cleanliness is next to clean-limbed, in the dictionary. The Bat! 3.61.06 Echo (Beta) Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpuGuh20rqOk.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Mod: Top posting (was: Problems with %TO: macro in a reply template.)
Hallo Oto, On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:03:23 +0200GMT (22-9-2005, 15:03 +0200, where I live), you wrote: OZ Create new MSG, not Create automatic reply. OZ -- OZ OttY OZ 2005/9/22, Luca [EMAIL PROTECTED]: moderator Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Oto. ' This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting. Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your message and following it with all quoted text below, is not encouraged and we actually request that you not do so on this list because a) It makes it difficult to glean context from what you typed at the top of the message and b) It encourages excessive quoting. We would much prefer if you quote just that much of the message to which you're replying, so we know what it is you're referring to, and then below the quotation, type your response. If you're responding to more than one part of the original, then quote each part separately and follow each part with your response. Now, I know that you may not personally prefer this format and that you may disagree with some of the reasoning here. We very much respect this. However, this is the format that most of the active members here prefer and all members are expected, and are being asked to use the format that will make most of the active membership here comfortable reading. You'll likely get a more responsive group when you post using a style that is comfortable for them to read and understand. To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you subscribed. Thank you. /moderator -- Groetjes, Roelof Avoid off-topic warnings: Add the moderator to your twitlist! pgp9eirMlKcbx.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Mod: Untrimmed reply (was: Problems with %TO: macro in a reply template.)
Hallo Oto, On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:03:23 +0200GMT (22-9-2005, 15:03 +0200, where I live), you wrote: Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html OZ OZ Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: OZ http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html moderator Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Oto. ' Please trim replies to context. A sure fire indicator that insufficient trimming has been done is that the original signature and list footer remain in the quoted text. To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you subscribed. Thank you. /moderator -- Groetjes, Roelof Mandatory Tagline omitted. Moderator gone berserk. Story at 11:00. pgpYze2L8YlBg.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problems with %TO: macro in a reply template.
Roelof Otten: Hallo Luca, L %TO= L %TO=[EMAIL PROTECTED] L This creates a reply with no To: field. AFAIK, TB is not supposed to do L that. You could try to drop both %To= macros and replace them with %SetHeader(To,[EMAIL PROTECTED]) It works for me, even with my regexp in it: %SETPATTREGEXP=[^ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]+%- %SetHeader(To,%REGEXPMATCH='%OSUBJ') Thank you very much. I bought TB right for this function, I need it to handle Yahoogroup's moderation requests, that come in this form: Subject: moderation request -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc Your signature delimiter doesn't work. Sorry, I forgot I'm posting with Agent+Gmane instead of TB. I ended out with two signatures. Thank you for enforcing top quoting too. -- Luca - e-mail: p.stevens at libero.it Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
