Re: Filters in v3

2006-01-08 Thread Chris
 Hello Chris,

 3.  TB! Message Filter 
 beginFilter
 UID: [B9153070.01C60E1A.5B96D817.1622DA7A]
 Name: Lists
 Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 MoveMessage folder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IsActive
 Ignore
 IsSendQueue
 endFilter

 I don't see any problem with this filter. I think your main problem, as
 others have pointed out, was the fact that you had all filters set to
 continue processing.

 Anyway, using 'Sender' has always been a bit confusing for me. I prefer
 to use the 'Header field' condition even if I have to OR several header
 fields.

 Hi MAU,

 Yeah, that could have been the problem. Since I disabled that
 processing option, all the (true) spam emails have gone to the Spam
 folder. All I'm now waiting for is a non-spam email to come in, so I
 can see if the rules above the spam filter do indeed move the
 messages into the proper folders. I'm subscribed to a few programs
 on BetaNews, so hopefully it won't be long before one of those 'this
 program has been updated' emails comes in, and then I will see if
 the filters are working properly. Once I do, I will post back here.


Yep, the filters seem to be working ok now. So, it was a combination of two 
things I think. First was removing the tick from the 'continue  processing' 
option on each of the rules. Second was changing the Spam rule from 'Sender 
contains {nothing}' (which is what it was under in v2 before I upgraded), to 
'Any Message'.

--

Chris

 --

 Chris





Current version is 3.64.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Filters in v3

2006-01-08 Thread MAU
Hello Chris,


 Yep, the filters seem to be working ok now. So, it was a combination
 of two things I think. First was removing the tick from the 'continue 
 processing' option on each of the rules. Second was changing the Spam
 rule from 'Sender contains {nothing}' (whic
 h is what it was under in v2 before I upgraded), to 'Any Message'.

Glad to hear they are working.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.64.03 Christmas Edition




Current version is 3.64.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Filters in v3

2006-01-07 Thread Chris
 Hello Chris,

 3.  TB! Message Filter 
 beginFilter
 UID: [B9153070.01C60E1A.5B96D817.1622DA7A]
 Name: Lists
 Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 MoveMessage folder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IsActive
 Ignore
 IsSendQueue
 endFilter

 I don't see any problem with this filter. I think your main problem, as
 others have pointed out, was the fact that you had all filters set to
 continue processing.

 Anyway, using 'Sender' has always been a bit confusing for me. I prefer
 to use the 'Header field' condition even if I have to OR several header
 fields.

Hi MAU,

Yeah, that could have been the problem. Since I disabled that processing 
option, all the (true) spam emails have gone to the Spam folder. All I'm now 
waiting for is a non-spam email to come in, so I can see if the rules above the 
spam filter do indeed move the messages into the proper folders. I'm subscribed 
to a few programs on BetaNews, so hopefully it won't be long before one of 
those 'this program has been updated' emails comes in, and then I will see if 
the filters are working properly. Once I do, I will post back here.

--

Chris



Current version is 3.64.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Filters in v3

2006-01-06 Thread MAU
Hello Chris,

 3.  TB! Message Filter 
 beginFilter
 UID: [B9153070.01C60E1A.5B96D817.1622DA7A]
 Name: Lists
 Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 MoveMessage folder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IsActive
 Ignore
 IsSendQueue
 endFilter

I don't see any problem with this filter. I think your main problem, as
others have pointed out, was the fact that you had all filters set to
continue processing.

Anyway, using 'Sender' has always been a bit confusing for me. I prefer
to use the 'Header field' condition even if I have to OR several header
fields.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.64.03 Christmas Edition

Winamp Playing: Pasion Vega - Tan Poquita Cosa



Current version is 3.64.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Filters in v3

2006-01-05 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Chris,

On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:13:38 +1100GMT (5-1-2006, 13:13 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:

C Can anyone give me some hints so I can try and work out why the
C filters don't seem to be working in v3?

You mentioned that you unchecked 'continue processing with other
filters'. The function of this option hasn't been changed in v3, but
what it always had as function was a follows: A message is compared
with the filters until it matches one. When a filter is triggered by a
message, that message won't be compared with the conditions for the
filters under the triggered filter, but when your triggered filter has
the 'continue with..' option checked the message is checked against
the following filters (until it matches a filter without that option
checked)

From your description it appears that you're having the option checked
for all filters and that would mean that all messages will be caught
by your catch all filter at the bottom. And you're complaining that
that happens as it should, why that didn't happen with your v2 install
is something that I don't understand. Probably something was corrupted
and the conversion to v3 fixed this.

So my first suggestion would be to drop the 'continue processing..'
option for all filters.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Apple (c) Copyright 1767, Sir Isaac Newton

The Bat! 3.64.01 Christmas Edition
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM


pgp1PK0EBIVaF.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.64.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Filters in v3

2006-01-05 Thread MAU
Hello Chris,


 I'm having a problem with filters since upgrading to v3.
...
...
 Can anyone give me some hints so I can try and work out why the
 filters don't seem to be working in v3?

Three things:

1.- Exactly which v3 are you using?
2.- While you get your filters to work I would suggest you change your
Spam filter to NOT delete messages.
3.- Can you copypaste one of your filters here in the list? To do so,
in case you don't know, just select the name of one of your filters and
Ctrl+C and then Ctrl+V in your reply.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.64.01 Christmas Edition




Current version is 3.64.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Filters in v3

2006-01-05 Thread Chris
Hallo Chris,

On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:13:38 +1100GMT (5-1-2006, 13:13 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:

C Can anyone give me some hints so I can try and work out why the
C filters don't seem to be working in v3?

You mentioned that you unchecked 'continue processing with other
filters'. The function of this option hasn't been changed in v3, but
what it always had as function was a follows: A message is compared
with the filters until it matches one. When a filter is triggered by a
message, that message won't be compared with the conditions for the
filters under the triggered filter, but when your triggered filter has
the 'continue with..' option checked the message is checked against
the following filters (until it matches a filter without that option
checked)

From your description it appears that you're having the option checked
for all filters and that would mean that all messages will be caught
by your catch all filter at the bottom. And you're complaining that
that happens as it should, why that didn't happen with your v2 install
is something that I don't understand. Probably something was corrupted
and the conversion to v3 fixed this.

So my first suggestion would be to drop the 'continue processing..'
option for all filters.

Hi Roelof,

Ok, I've removed the check from all the continue processing options. I thought 
that option was to tell The Bat! to continue with the other filters if it 
didn't find a match for the first filter, which is why I had them all checked. 
If The Bat! continues on with all the other filters if the very first one 
doesn't match, than all the better. Anyway, I will see if removing the check 
fixes the problem.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Apple (c) Copyright 1767, Sir Isaac Newton

The Bat! 3.64.01 Christmas Edition
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM


--

Chris



Current version is 3.64.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Filters in v3

2006-01-05 Thread Chris
Hello Chris,


 I'm having a problem with filters since upgrading to v3.
...
...
 Can anyone give me some hints so I can try and work out why the
 filters don't seem to be working in v3?

Three things:

1.- Exactly which v3 are you using?
2.- While you get your filters to work I would suggest you change your
Spam filter to NOT delete messages.
3.- Can you copypaste one of your filters here in the list? To do so,
in case you don't know, just select the name of one of your filters and
Ctrl+C and then Ctrl+V in your reply.

Hi Miguel,

1. v3.64.01
2. Ok, done. Now all the messages just go to the inbox.
3.  TB! Message Filter 
beginFilter
UID: [B9153070.01C60E1A.5B96D817.1622DA7A]
Name: Lists
Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MoveMessage folder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IsActive
Ignore
IsSendQueue
endFilter

The 'Spam' filter itself (straight after the upgrade), consisted of:

 TB! Message Filter 
beginFilter
UID: [D5505438.01C611BF.617A6912.6629D95E]
Name: Spam
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`21\0D\0A}
MoveMessage folder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IsActive
Ignore
endFilter

This was with the Sender field contains nothing. I thought that may have been 
the problem, so I changed it to:

 TB! Message Filter 
beginFilter
UID: [D5505438.01C611BF.617A6912.6629D95E]
Name: Spam
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`21\0D\0A}
MoveMessage folder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IsActive
Ignore
endFilter

which is Any Message. That wasn't the problem I worked out - because neither of 
them work.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.64.01 Christmas Edition

--

Chris



Current version is 3.64.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Filters in v3 (and perhaps v2 as well for all I know)

2004-09-09 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Stuart,

On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 10:54:10 +0100GMT (9-9-2004, 11:54 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

SM Filters are driving me potty.

Don't despair.

SM I belong to a mailing list for Pentax camera owners. This list has
SM a lot of messages a day but I am only interested in messages that
SM are about my camera,

That's understandable.

SM namely a *ist D - a stupid name I know.

But a nice camera

SM However, what I really want to do, is delete any messages
SM that do not contain these.

ACK

SM However, having removed the virtual folder and create a new filter
SM on the inbox using the same criteria I find I get NO matches!!

I guess that you had a filter in place that moved Pentax messages to
another folder. Now if you follow that with a filter that will be
triggered by a subselection of the same messages it won't do that,
unless you set the option 'continue processing with other filters'
(both v2 and v3) or when you make the second filter a subfilter for
the first (v3 only)

As you're looking for something that'll work for both v2 and v3, you
could try this:

Filter1:
Sender contains list-address
AND message source does not contain  *ist d
AND message source does not contain  *istd
Action move to trash

Filter2:
Sender contains list-address
Action move to folder

Filters are processed top down in the sorting office.
As filter1 processes every list message without '*ist d' and '*istd'
the only list messages that filter2 will see are those with either one
or both of these strings. So filter2 doesn't need to be more specific
than this.

When you'd change the order of these two filters, this solution
wouldn't work anymore, because filter2 picked all of the messages,
therefore letting filter1 run dry. To prevent this you'd need to set
'continue processing with other filters' on filter2 and you'd need to
set the source folder for filter1 to the target folder of filter2.

Changing the order would have two disadvantages.
1: Most of your list messages will be processed twice by a filter,
   this takes time
2: Your filters are getting more complicated
3: Even though they're deleted from your list folder, the unwanted
   list messages will be copied to your list folder and therefore
   they'll take space until the next time you're compressing that
   folder.

Note: Most people tend to skip on characters that are neither letter
nor number (hardly anybody on this list talks about 'The Bat!') and
unless Pentax owners differ on this point (what I cannot imagine,
myself owning a Pentax as secondary camera) they'll tend to skip the
asterix, so you could do that too.



-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

The Bat! 3.0.0.8
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
1 pop3 account, server on LAN

Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies 
or rabbits.


pgpAw4aK00tkK.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Filters in v3 (and perhaps v2 as well for all I know)

2004-09-09 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Stuart,

On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 15:14:23 +0100GMT (9-9-2004, 16:14 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

SM [*]ist[-][d] in the subject line or main text (where []
SM denotes optional and this is a complete word so I do not get
SM matches on words beginning with ist)

SM I assume this should be something along these lines:

SM (?i)^*?ist-?d?$

A dash? I thought it was *ist d
I'd go for ^\*?ist\s?d$
\s standing for a space

Why do you give an option for the 'd', without that it's an analog
slr IIRC.

SM I am guessing that * and - have special meanings so I can not do it this way.

You can escape special characters by using a backslash.

RO Note: Most people tend to skip on characters that are neither letter
RO nor number (hardly anybody on this list talks about 'The Bat!') and
SM Sadly, a very high proportion of the members include the *.

That's not so bad, after all you can search for it.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

The Bat! 3.0.0.8
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
1 pop3 account, server on LAN

Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies 
or rabbits.


pgpaCEOVYilth.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html