Re: The Bat! - suggestions - improved search option

2003-08-22 Thread Mark Wieder
Greg-

Thursday, August 21, 2003, 8:05:44 PM, you wrote:

GS By 'escape' do you mean match the literal character?

Yep. Thanks. I forgot about the Advanced tab. That should do the
trick.

-- 
-Mark Wieder
 Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: The Bat! - suggestions - improved search option

2003-08-21 Thread Samson
Hello Carsten,

I agree with you... sometimes i feel i need something like the
following:

- search all mails with subject project and my email is in cc
  field

or

- if my email is in the cc field, filter it to another folder

but current search/filter (i suppose their matching algorithm are
shared) cannot do such a multiple/precise match. (thebat support once
gave me some dirty trick to use reg-ex to match the whole text, but it
sometimes is inaccurate)

i really hope a better search dialog, with multiple conditions, etc.


(Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows NT Clone 5.2 Build 3790 )

-- 
Best regards,
 Samsonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Wednesday, August 20, 2003, 11:55:54 PM, you wrote:

CT hello,

CT I tried to send this suggestion to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but the server
CT rejected the mail. So I post it here for discussion:

CT I´d like to see an improved search-option for messages, above all
CT multiple search-fields with options like includes ..., not includes
CT and a linkage between the fields like and, or. The search option in
CT Eudora is a good example. In my opinion, if you save lots of
CT information in your email-archive, a simple search option is not
CT sufficient.
  

CT best wishes
CT Carten Thinius



CT 
CT Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
CT http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: The Bat! - suggestions - improved search option

2003-08-21 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Carsten!

On Thursday, August 21, 2003, 1:55 AM, you wrote, in part:

C I tried to send this suggestion to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but the server
C rejected the mail. ...

Go to this URL

https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/

and create an account for yourself. Then you can put your suggestion
on the wish list: to see the wish list, you have to use a Switch
button in the upper righthand corner of the page.

This information is found at

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

which URL is at the bottom of every message on TBUDL. (Sometimes it's
easy to forget about that resource :) )

Marck D. Pearlstone explained the change to me in message ID
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on August 16. He said:

MB The wish list address  turns out to be [EMAIL PROTECTED]

MDP These addresses are no longer the primary entry points. Instead
MDP there is now a complete web interface where Wishes can be viewed,
MDP added to and commented upon.

MDP The address for the online BugTraq/Wishlist system is
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/

And I agree with you, a more advanced search system would be most
useful. Please go to the site and post your wish!!

-- 
Best regards,
Mary

The Bat! 1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: The Bat! - suggestions - improved search option

2003-08-21 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Carsten,

 I´d like to see an improved search-option for messages, above all
 multiple search-fields with options like includes ..., not includes
 and a linkage between the fields like and, or. The search option in
 Eudora is a good example. In my opinion, if you save lots of
 information in your email-archive, a simple search option is not
 sufficient.

How about the ability to save a search? Never used Eudora so I don't
know what is available in it.

-- 
Best regards,

Greg Strong

Using The Bat! v2.0 Beta/3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 1



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: The Bat! - suggestions - improved search option

2003-08-21 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hello Carsten,

CT I tried to send this suggestion to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but the server
CT rejected the mail. So I post it here for discussion:

You should use commands from the Help|Feedback menu to write us -
this helps us to determine where the enquiry should be sent.
Suggestions should be submitted to the https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
site.

CT I´d like to see an improved search-option for messages, above all
CT multiple search-fields with options like includes ..., not includes
CT and a linkage between the fields like and, or.

Actually, this is planned already, for a subsequent release of 2.0.
Currently, you can use special syntax in the search text field:

+ or  - for AND
|  - for OR
~  - for NOT



-- 
Cheers!
 Stefan

Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: The Bat! - suggestions - improved search option

2003-08-21 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Stefan,

On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 13:54:28 -0400 GMT (22/08/2003, 00:54 +0700 GMT),
Stefan Tanurkov wrote:

 Actually, this is planned already, for a subsequent release of 2.0.
 Currently, you can use special syntax in the search text field:

 + or  - for AND
 |  - for OR
 ~  - for NOT


~ for NOT? Shouldn't that be !?

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

CHRISTOPHER HOPE was disappointed by the warning he spotted on a
gallon container of the laboratory disinfectant Hibitane. Avoid
contact with brain, it told him, thereby spoiling his plans for a
fun-filled afternoon drilling holes in his skull and pouring
disinfectant into them.

Message reply created with The Bat! 2.0 Beta/3
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 128MB RAM




Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: The Bat! - suggestions - improved search option

2003-08-21 Thread Mark Wieder
TF ~ for NOT? Shouldn't that be !?

And in either case, is it possible to escape the literal character?
\~ or \! or something?
-- 
-Mark Wieder
 Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: The Bat! - suggestions - improved search option

2003-08-21 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Mark,

 And in either case, is it possible to escape the literal character?
 \~ or \! or something?

By 'escape' do you mean match the literal character?

If yes, then the answer is yes and much more by using regular
expressions which is selected on the 'Advanced' tab.  See 'Message
Finder' and 'Regular Expressions Syntax (Basic)' in the help file.

-- 
Best regards,

Greg Strong

Using The Bat! v2.0 Beta/3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 1



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: The Bat! - suggestions / wishlist

2003-02-01 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo brothers,

On Sat, 1 Feb 2003 13:46:14 -0500GMT (1-2-03, 19:46 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:

bcc a. Can an option be added to Sorting Office Rules - Actions-
bcc Redirect Message to Do not Save to Sent Folder. I have a filter
bcc set up to forward certain items to myself at work. Since I
bcc already keep the original in a separate folder, I dont need yet
bcc another copy in the Sent folder.

Create an outgoing filter that moves messages that contain the
Resent-from: header with your name and address and maybe a certain To:
address (that would be up to you) not from the outbox to 'sent mail',
but to trash. That would do the same

bcc b. IRT above can a Do not log checkbox or button be added to
bcc the send window for those messages which you do not want a copy
bcc saved.

Create an outgoing filter that does the same as the previous one I
suggested, but checks for 'Comments: Do not log' in the kludges and
create a quick template that inserts that header. The only thing that
QT has to contain is this:
%comment=Do not log%-
Store the QT as nolog, you can call it by typing nolog in the message
followed by Ctrl-Space. That would have the same effect as your
proposed features, only you don't have to wait until somebody else
implements them. ;-)

bcc Cheers \\'olfman
bcc --

BTW Your signature delimiter is broken, it should read
dash,dash,space,enter but it misses the trailing space.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: The Bat! - suggestions / wishlist

2003-02-01 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello brothers,

 a. Can an option be added to Sorting Office Rules - Actions-
 Redirect Message to Do not Save to Sent Folder. I have a filter
 set up to forward certain items to myself at work. Since I already
 keep the original in a separate folder, I dont need yet another copy
 in the Sent folder. In the (now archaic) SUN(r) mailtool this is akin
 to the Do not log checkbox.

Create an Outgoing mail rule that moves messages directly to Trash. I
do this for example with messages I send to this list... because I
will get a copy back from the list.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: The Bat! - suggestions: Outgoing Mail notification

2001-11-02 Thread Dierk Haasis

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Syafril!

On Friday, November 02, 2001 at 8:28:40 AM you wrote:

 Suppose we already have Draft Folder, then we can set Outbox Folder to
 trigger  Mail  Ticker.  If  at  any  reason TB! can not send mail, the
 messages will stay in Outbox Folder, and the Ticker comes up.

That's a nice idea!


- --
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.54/10 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

Alone: In bad company. (Ambrose Bierce)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt
Comment: Privacy is the core element to Freedom!

iQA/AwUBO+KzgvTo1oA8g8dLEQIF8gCgq4IHnDVsVj27NGutUne7dm5CGDwAniUZ
WbBLnS7R0k79NAu35EZ37YdE
=fyfU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: The Bat! - suggestions: Confirmation requests

2001-11-01 Thread Dierk Haasis

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Chema!

On Wednesday, October 31, 2001 at 1:04:16 PM you wrote:

 It would be nice to add to TB a new feature:
Ignore confirmation request/Answer confirmations automatically.

AFAIR, you have the option to get a permission request by TB! or let
it send out a conf req automatically. Actually there are two things I
*don't* want TB! to do: Answer confirmation requests automatically and
ignoring such requests.

For the first point, I can only add that I myself sometimes use such
requests to check an older e-mail address. If someone does it on me, I
want to be able to *not* send a confirmation.

And ignoring would be foolish since it could be necessary to get a
confirmation.





- --
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.54/10 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

One thing about the past. It's likely to last. (Ogden Nash)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt
Comment: Privacy is the core element to Freedom!

iQA/AwUBO9/5VfTo1oA8g8dLEQIUQgCeMjEJTiY+SPhy3WLFfQC8gCUq8aYAoMof
4WejUs3ic4se5uTSc2wmojrk
=Y0WQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: The Bat! - suggestions: Outgoing Mail notification

2001-11-01 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

On  Thu,  1 Nov 2001 at 09:14:08 GMT +0100 (01/11/2001 15:14 where you
think I live) Dierk Haasis=[DH] wrote to RITLABS :

DH   There are some features I would like to see in your program:

DH   For some time now I am working with a minimised TB! main window, an
DH   automatically displayed/not displayed CC and the MT. this is great
DH   for incoming mail.

DH   But I am over and over again forgetting about mail to send. what I
DH   would like is a notification (lets say in the MT with another colour
DH   or font) about outgoing mail residing in my accounts.

Ahem...seems  you  have  a lot of draft messages on Outbox folder, and
because TB! not having draft folder (yet), sometimes confuse which one
deferred message or draft messages :-)


-- 
Best regards,

- Syafril -   mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Flying with The Bat! 1.54/10
under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: The Bat! - suggestions: Outgoing Mail notification

2001-11-01 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

On  Thu,  1 Nov 2001 at 11:24:02 GMT +0100 (01/11/2001 17:24 where you
think I live) Dierk Haasis=[DH] wrote to Syafril Hermansyah :

 and because TB! not having draft folder (yet), sometimes confuse
 which one deferred message or draft messages :-)

DH What makes you think so?

Suppose we already have Draft Folder, then we can set Outbox Folder to
trigger  Mail  Ticker.  If  at  any  reason TB! can not send mail, the
messages will stay in Outbox Folder, and the Ticker comes up.

-- 
Best regards,

- Syafril -   mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Flying with The Bat! 1.54/10
under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2001-10-31 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

On  Wed, 31 Oct 2001 at 13:04:16 GMT +0100 (31/10/2001 19:04 where you
think I live) Chema Berian=[CB] wrote to RITLABS :

CB   There are some features I would like to see in your program:

CB Every day, more and more users of email clients forget to disable the reading
CB confirmation request.

CB It would be nice to add to TB a new feature:
CBIgnore confirmation request/Answer confirmations automatically.

It's already there, see Account Template and Folder Template :-)

Perhaps you meant while sending to Mailing List ? I hit with this stuff
in  the  past,  that's  why  in all of TB! list I set Listar to remove
those  header  (you  may  do  this on your MDaemon listserver as well,
contact me off list if you need it) :-)

-- 
Best regards,

- Syafril -   mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Flying with The Bat! 1.54/10
under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2001-10-31 Thread Chema Berian

Hello Listers, 

On Wed, 31 Oct 2001,  at 19:20:23 [GMT +0700] (which was 13:20 where I
live)  Syafril wrote:

CBIgnore confirmation request/Answer confirmations
CBautomatically.

SH It's already there, see Account Template and Folder Template :-)

SH Perhaps you meant while sending to Mailing List ? I hit with this stuff
SH in  the  past,  that's  why  in all of TB! list I set Listar to remove
SH those  header  (you  may  do  this on your MDaemon listserver as well,
SH contact me off list if you need it) :-)

 No, I referred to those specified in your answer, it is not Mdaemon
 related, I am blind :D

 Thanks

--
Chema Berian 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spanish GDUTB Moderator  
Subscriptions: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! 1.53o on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2

TB  Tip  of  the  Moment: You can add a filtering string to a set by
Alt+Ins keystroke when filtering string set editor is active.

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: The Bat! - suggestions - Sharing the filters

2001-06-09 Thread Raj

Hi Lija

L It's very simple, really... or at least I think so. :)
L Since we already have Share with other accounts option to share quick
L templates among accounts, and it works fine, it would be _very good_ to
L implement *sharing of filters* (Sorting Office) among accounts.
L I don't ask too much, just one check-box... :)

Agree with you 100%. Another possibility is where the user is allowed to copy a filter 
to
another account.

Another feature could be where a single 'account' can check multiple 'pop'. I have a 
few
web based mail accounts which allow for pop access and also subscribe for multiple
newsletters. If I could use a single account to check for all these accounts, I could
reduce the number of accounts - making he display more pleasing.

-- 
Best regards,

Raj

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Created on Monday, June 04, 2001 using The Bat ver 1.51

Sunday, June 03, 2001, 1:29:12 PM, you wrote:

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions - Sharing the filters

2001-06-09 Thread A Curtis Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 10 Jun 2001 00:19:32 +0200, ANT-ilic contributed this to our
collective wisdom:
...
R Another feature could be where a single 'account' can check multiple
R 'pop'. I have a few web based mail accounts which allow for pop access
R and also subscribe for multiple newsletters. If I could use a single
R account to check for all these accounts, I could reduce the number of
R accounts - making he display more pleasing.

Ai Did you tried to filter all messages to a single account's inbox?

Ai It should do what you asked for...

Another way would be to use one of those freeware POP servers. Install it.
Create a local POP account, configure it to download mail from all those
remote POP accounts. Finally set up TB! to download mail from the local
POP account ... POP server - localhost, password - the one you configured.

Two freeware apps that come to mind include Mercury/32 and the other is
Hamster. Mercury is better since it has better documentation. It has a
relatively small memory footprint. See:

http://www.pmail.com/overviews/ovw_mercwin.htm

If you use multiple POP accounts then you may also have problems with
sending messages using a single ISP SMTP server. Mercury will help you
here as well since it comes packaged with a fully functional SMTP server
module.


There are two disadvantages with filtering from one account to another.
One is that you'd have to still create accounts for each remote POP
account. The other is that the only way to filter to another account and
use the main accounts filters is to redirect the messages to the main
account. This will lead to message header adjustments. To prevent this
you'd have to create filters for each account and do the filtering from
each account directly to the main accounts folders.

Using a local POP server will prevent your having to create multiple
accounts in TB!. You'll have no problems with filtering and the messages
will be unaltered.

Be that as it may, the enigmatic version 2 of TB! is slated to have
multiple POP server support per account.

- --
A. Curtis Martin  ••  List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
Using The Bat! (v1.53 RC/3) [OS: Windows 2000 (Service Pack 2)]
 -
'If you try to fail, and succeed, which have you done?'
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Get my Public Key here - http://key.ac-martin.com

iEYEARECAAYFAjsi2okACgkQV8nrYCsHF+JGawCfTHSqouH5aoqwU87ncYSNEb+u
QNcAoNq7/RLAtFRLcZaAXNbO1eHn7MZM
=Cs/z
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions - Sharing the filters

2001-06-03 Thread Ottar Grimstad

Hello Lija,

L It's very simple, really... or at least I think so. :)
L Since we already have Share with other accounts option to share quick
L templates among accounts, and it works fine, it would be _very good_ to
L implement *sharing of filters* (Sorting Office) among accounts.
L I don't ask too much, just one check-box... :)

L I know that the people from TBUDL|TECH|BETA agree with me, right? :=)

Yes, I do.


-- 
Regards,
 Ottarmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions - Saving display filtering preferences

2001-06-03 Thread Nick Andriash

On Sunday June 3, 2001 at 6:58:38 AM, Lija wrote:

  When you go to View | Display | Advanced filtering, you wish sometimes
  (I wish always!) to save some preferences for the future use. Something
  like, to display all messages from, e.g. Stefan Tanurkov and save that
  setting. Next time when we want to look only messages from our dear
  Stef, :), we'll call that setting, instead of bugging with:
  Sender's name is/contains: type here Stef etc.

Why don't you just set up a Filter for Stef's mail, and colour code it?
Works fine for me, and you can have a multitude of colours for a multitude
of Senders. At least with that, you can see at a glance if Stef has
written you or the List, and if you want to view only Stef's messages,
simply hit F7/Advanced/Message Colour Is:  :o)

-- 
Nick

 -=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Canada=- 
SecureBat! v1.53/iKey1000 | Win 98 SE | GnuPG v1.0.6 
__

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2001-04-15 Thread Nick Andriash

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On April 14, 2001, at 8:19:43 PM, Maurice Snellen wrote:

ACM Some of the editors great formatting routines such as the
ACM reformatting of quoted material will lead to this sort of
ACM limitation.

Sorry I'm coming in late on this thread, but could you refresh my memory
on what sort of limitations Allie was talking about?

 Not necessarily. Basicly, the editor only needs to make this
 difference for as long as you are editing the message, or maybe it
 should even save the message with the information on soft and hard
 returns intact. On screen, while editing, the wrapping behaviour would
 be as defined by the maximum width of the message, such as 76
 characters on a line.

Just for clarification, a soft return is one where the line automatically
wraps, and a hard return is where the User actually hits the "Enter" key,
is that correct? What you are proposing is that TB! not use hard returns
where soft returns would normally go?

 Upon hitting send, the soft returns would automatically be replaced
 with hard returns, causing there to be no difference between the
 message on-screen and the way it is sent.

If TB!'s Editor was to do that, and realising that PGP wraps/signs a
message *before* the MUA would... in your example... replace the soft
returns with hard returns, it would have to be such that there was
absolutely no difference in the two messages... not even one character...
otherwise the PGP signature would be broken. Do you feel that condition
would be met if TB! were to make those changes after the User hit the
"Send" button?

 I've seen this kind of ability before in my old FidoNet editor, GoldEd
 (www.goldware.dk) although I must admit that the reformatting of
 quoted text in GoldEd requires a little more user intervention.

Again I am presuming you were referring to the quirkiness of the TB!
Editor's auto-format feature, and that a re-make of the Editor such that
it would allow for soft returns would eliminate such quirkiness?


Nick

  ___
-=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Canada=- 
  [ TB! v1.52 Beta 1 | Win 98 SE 4.10  A ] 
   [ PGP 7.0.4 | Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE ]  
  ___

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 7.0.4
Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iQA/AwUBOtm5jMUChHR7o/3OEQI1vQCbB2ykfs3xEXkk5YkwvXjIqHV7QJMAn236
jmiZTZYyW32fVUhpuorRUrn6
=gGmQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2001-04-11 Thread Thomas

Hallo Allie,

On Tue, 10 Apr 2001 19:17:36 -0500 GMT (11/04/2001, 08:17 +0800 GMT),
A Curtis Martin wrote:



MS 2) Drag and Drop attachments

MS I often receive messages containing more than one attachment of which
MS I need to forward only one or several but not all to someone else. In
MS order to do so, it would be nice if one could open the mail, open a
MS second, new mail and just drag and drop the attachments that need to
MS be added to the outgoing mail right from the window of the received
MS mail onto the window of the new mail.

ACM Now THAT would make for an interesting addition. Great suggestion.

I just tried it and am actually surprised it doesn't work! ;-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

-Love is blind but like is just too freaked out to see straight. 

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.49g
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 
using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2001-04-10 Thread A Curtis Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 11 Apr 2001 00:52:13 +0200, Maurice wrote these words of wisdom:

MS 1) Hard returns and soft returns

MS When 'Auto-Format' is on, it is impossible to have two consecutive
MS lines that are not filled to the maximum width allowed by the set
MS margins. It seems that there is no difference between what in word
MS processors is sometimes referred to as a soft-return and a
MS hard-return.

Some of the editors great formatting routines such as the reformatting of
quoted material will lead to this sort of limitation. The added advantage
is that you'll always be aware of the formatting of your text and what the
recipient will be seeing at the other end. Soft returns can be very
deceptive and can lead to some lousy formatting that the recipient has to
deal with.

The only application that I see dealing with soft returns in a positive
way is Agent and Becky, but then again, neither of them can reflow quoted
material the way TB! can...

MS As a result, I often find myself continuously switching back and forth
MS between 'Auto-Format' on and off.

If you find yourself constantly having to switch between both you may do
better keeping auto-format off and then hitting alt+l whenever you need to
do any text reflowing.

MS On a side note: is it possible to have the cursor only go to places
MS where text and/or spaces were already typed, and to have the text be
MS able to have spaces after the last character on a line, if only to be
MS able to verify that the signature separator has a space after it.

TB!'s editor is pretty stuck in it's methodology and version 2 is slated
to either include and alternate editor or provisions to seamlessly use an
external editor of your choice.

MS 2) Drag and Drop attachments

MS I often receive messages containing more than one attachment of which
MS I need to forward only one or several but not all to someone else. In
MS order to do so, it would be nice if one could open the mail, open a
MS second, new mail and just drag and drop the attachments that need to
MS be added to the outgoing mail right from the window of the received
MS mail onto the window of the new mail.

Now THAT would make for an interesting addition. Great suggestion.

- --
Allie,
 -= A. Curtis Martin =-
List Moderator (and fellow end-user)
   The Bat! v1.52 Beta/4 \\// Win2k (SP1)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Build/04..
Comment: PGP Key ID: 0x57C9EB602B0717E2   (Sealed for security).

iQA/AwUBOtOioVfJ62ArBxfiEQIKUwCeJX7KyAf3JqTzacbK7IOwvf75xhYAnjGC
vN2D0Ur9kfdlJiQX2GlSpvVQ
=9zO1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: The Bat! - suggestions - skip and later

2001-01-24 Thread Nick Andriash

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On January 24, 2001, at 7:19:53 PM, Abigail Marshall Wrote:

AM This does NOT work well because even if only the header is downloaded,
AM the body of the message is deleted by TB from the server, so it can't
AM be retrieved later.

Yes, this has been a long standing issue with RITLabs. I learned the
hard way about "downloading only the header"... and having the body of
the message immediately deleted. I don't know what the answer is, but
nothing has been forthcoming from RITLabs, and IMAP is not the answer
either, because a lot of ISP's will not have them. :o(


Nick


N.J. Andriash [ TB! v1.49c | PGP 7.0.3 | Win 98 SE ]
 Vancouver, B.C. Canada | PGP Key ID:  0x7BA3FDCE  


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 7.0.3
Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iQA/AwUBOm8YSMUChHR7o/3OEQLg6gCfeYrBJjV6yC33aHudpHtWh1M7Ma8AoOub
IkV2k5QI57KhhpT07wQW7lW6
=ZvFO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions - skip and later

2001-01-24 Thread A . Curtis Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:00:44 -0800, Nick graced us with these
comments:

AM This does NOT work well because even if only the header is
AM downloaded, the body of the message is deleted by TB from the
AM server, so it can't be retrieved later.

NA Yes, this has been a long standing issue with RITLabs. I learned
NA the hard way about "downloading only the header"... and having the
NA body of the message immediately deleted. I don't know what the
NA answer is, but nothing has been forthcoming from RITLabs,

This problem may be solved with the creation of two filters that
should be placed at the top of your filter list.

1) The first should be a filter for your large message notification:

Source: Inbox
Destination: Inbox
Strings : The Bat!
Location: Sender
Presence: Yes

Be sure that for this filter, that the option "Continue processing
with other filters is *NOT* checked.


2) The second filter would be to delete all messages from the server
as they come in:

Source: Inbox
Destination: Inbox
Strings: 'e'
Location: Anywhere
Presence: Yes

Action: Delete message from server
Options: Continue processing with other filters  (VERY IMPORTANT
 that that last option is enabled)

With that setup, all messages will be deleted from the server after
they're downloaded except for messages not downloaded, i.e., large
messages. The message deletions are performed during the next mail
check.

The initial filter will prevent the large messages from being included
in the deletions.

- --
@~@@~@
 |   A. Curtis Martin  [List Moderator TB(UDL|BETA|TECH)]   |
 | PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey |
@_@   (Opinions given are mine and not those of RITLABS)   @_@
__
TB! v1.49c | Windows NT 5.00.2195 (Service Pack 1)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Digitally signed for sender and message authentication.

iQA/AwUBOm8041fJ62ArBxfiEQLiWACgsypo6qg099JT+hqY+Qx+fntu4wEAoMhn
ffuqBt8f/Gcxn086Ntq+hyAD
=u7kQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions - skip and later

2001-01-22 Thread Thomas

Hallo Abigail,

On Sun, 21 Jan 2001 17:06:42 -0800 GMT (22/01/2001, 09:06 +0800 GMT),
Abigail Marshall wrote:

 In a very OLD version of Netscape mail - probably Netscape 3, - it was
 possible to configure the mail program to not download messages over a
 certain user-specified size. For example, if the user specified that
 messages over 100k would not be downloaded, then the messages would
 only be partially downloaded, along with a message saying that the
 remainder had been left on the server, and Netscape 3 would skip ahead
 to the next message. Then you could go back later to retrieve the
 balance of the partially downloaded message.

This is exactly how it worked in Eudora, and I sued that feature a lot
before I converted to TB almost two years ago. Many a time have I
requested a similar functionality of the "download header only if
message over ... kb), because the current functionality (namely that
the message is deleted from server after download of header) is
contra-intuitive.

After I download the header can I decide whether or not I want to
download the full message. By that time is has already been deleted
from the server. :-(

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Q: What's a polar bear?
A: A rectangular bear after a coordinate transform. 

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.49c
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 
using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions - dispatcher

2001-01-21 Thread Thomas

Hallo Krzysztof,

On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 17:16:09 +0100 GMT (21/01/2001, 00:16 +0800 GMT),
Krzysztof J. Trybowski wrote:

KJT Alternatively,  I'd like dispatcher to work in an interactive mode
KJT --  just  after  the  request  to download headers, the dispatcher
KJT window would appear, and the headers would appear in it one-by-one
KJT while  being downloaded. User could stop downloading of headers at
KJT any time, and start working with dispatcher as usual.

KJT CCed to TBUDL - what do you think guys?

I like the idea.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

"Momentum: What you give a person when they are going away."

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.49c
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 
using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions - skip and later

2001-01-21 Thread Christopher J. Trybowski

Hello A,
On Saturday, January 20, 2001 you wrote:

 Why not prevent downloading of these large messages and then download
 them later at your leisure with the dispatcher. In fact you can even
 ignore some after examining the headers.

Because  configuring  TB  in  the way you said means that this will be
permanent.  What  I  wish  is much simpler and can be applied when for
some  reason  I  decide  that I want to skip the message. For example,
this  and only this particular time the connection is very slow or I'm
just  in  a  hurry  and that 1,5 meg message blocks all other. Yeah, I
could  cancel  downloading  and  trigger  mail  dispatcher,  but after
pressing  cancel  and  answering  "no",  all  the  already  downloaded
messages  would  be  marked for retrieval again. I'd have to wait till
all  their  headers  are  downloaded *again* and then mess with all of
them. Takes much time. And "skip" would be such simple solution.

I'm  not  sure  about  technical  possibilities of realizing it. Is it
possible  in  POP3  to  cancel  the  retrieval  of  a message, without
cancelling  whole  session (which would lead to all the downloaded and
"deleted" messages be downloaded again)? Opss, this should actually go
to TBTECH...

-- 
 / Krzysztof Trybowski  pgp 0xC2AF5441 /--/  To get my pgp key, put  /
/ www.thebat.i.krakow.pl  uin 4350719 /--/  "send_key" in subject.  /_

Using The Bat! 1.49c [reg] under Windows NT 5.0 build 2195.

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions - skip and later

2001-01-21 Thread Mike Yetto

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, at 17:06:42 [GMT -0800], Abigail Marshall wrote:

AM In a very OLD version of Netscape mail - probably Netscape 3, - it was
AM possible to configure the mail program to not download messages over a
AM certain user-specified size. For example, if the user specified that
AM messages over 100k would not be downloaded, then the messages would
AM only be partially downloaded, along with a message saying that the
AM remainder had been left on the server, and Netscape 3 would skip ahead
AM to the next message. Then you could go back later to retrieve the
AM balance of the partially downloaded message.

Do you mean "Account/Properties/Mail management/Receive header only if
message size is greater than"? Set the spinner next to that prompt to
the maximum size that doesn't need your attention. I can't say how
well this works, as I have a broadband connection and don't use this
feature. This isn't a substitute for a clean skip or cancel of the
transfer where the already downloaded messages are handled properly on
the server, but it should help some and is already here.

Mike Yetto

- --
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=MAY:PGP_Key
E-mailed using The Bat! v1.49 running on
Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBOmupCtkz/SR3Uv4yEQJ3pQCg5f5TFk1os9d+4nKzo6AqRqj1OVsAn0FU
qAixsdFigOyfCD6/VfpDWUVi
=qxwa
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions - skip and later

2001-01-20 Thread A . Curtis Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 17:09:38 +0100, Krzysztof graced us with these
comments:

KJT I'd  greatly  appreciate  a very simple thing like a "skip"
KJT button on  "Receiving  mail"  window. This would skip current
KJT message and start  downloading next one. Also a "later"
KJT button would be nice - this  would  also  cause  TB  to  skip
KJT the message being currently downloaded,  but  contrary to the
KJT previous one, it would move this message to the end of the
KJT queue (so that I can start processing my other  mail,  while
KJT waiting  for  the  given  message  to  finish downloading).
KJT This  is  of  course useful with large messages (on slow
KJT connections even 100kB messages are considered "large").

KJT CCed to TBUDL - what do you think guys?

Why not prevent downloading of these large messages and then download
them later at your leisure with the dispatcher. In fact you can even
ignore some after examining the headers.

- --
@~@@~@
 |   A. Curtis Martin  [List Moderator TB(UDL|BETA|TECH)]   |
 | PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey |
@_@   (Opinions given are mine and not those of RITLABS)   @_@
__
TB! v1.49b | Windows NT 5.00.2195 (Service Pack 1)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Digitally signed for sender and message authentication.

iQA/AwUBOmoNu1fJ62ArBxfiEQKe0ACfR+xif6gA68xHr/pLXG6mZfo7Q6QAnRGI
iAaInve4cgoZmtjbX7s5vLua
=bQ43
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions: Undelete

2001-01-08 Thread Manfred Ell

On 08-01-2001 at 01:23:12GMT +0800 (which was 17:23 where I live)
Thomas Fernandez wrote regarding the subject of "The Bat! - suggestions: Undelete"


Hello Thomas,

Thomas When I browse deleted messages using the folder menu, I would like
Thomas to have an option to undelete a message.

This would be REAL nice.
If I'm not completely mistaken, this has been suggested before. And
we're still waiting...

Regards

-- 
Manfred
___
[ TheBat 1.49 (FE1905D5), Windows 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1, RC 1.1 ]



"Of all animals, the boy is most unmanageable." - Plato

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions: Undelete

2001-01-08 Thread Dieter Hummel

Hello Listmembers,

On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 at 01:23:12 [GMT +0800] Thomas Fernandez wrote:

 When  I  browse deleted messages using the folder menu, I would like
 to have an option to undelete a message.

Simply  drag  and  drop  the  message  wherever  you  want  to have it
'undeleted' to.

Regards
Dieter

__
TheBat! 1.49 [2E7F60DA] on Windows v5.0 Build 2195 SP1 

-- 
Authorized German Registration Site:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=BatReg
http://www.register-me.de/the_bat/register.html
German Support : http://www.register-me.de/the_bat
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dieter Hummel[EMAIL PROTECTED] FRA/GER 65931

++ Outgoing mail with possible attachment is found to be virus free ++
   Checked by AVP, using database update from 01-07-2001



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions, Password field in address book and edit before printing

2000-12-19 Thread Jan Rifkinson

Hello Andrej,

  In a post time stamped re: "The Bat! - suggestions, Password
  field in address book and edit before printing" you wrote:

Andrej In the 1.48 version you have added most of my wishs, I speak about
Andrej macros in all fields of address book,

  What do you mean -- "macros in all fields of address book"?

  Thank you.

-- 
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB! 1.47 Halloween Edition
PGP ID: 0x4C9CDF9D



Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions, Password field in address book and edit before printing

2000-12-19 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Jan,

On 19 December 2000 at 09:24:19 -0500 (which was 14:24 where I
live) Jan Rifkinson wrote and made these points:

Andrej In the 1.48 version you have added most of my wishs, I speak about
Andrej macros in all fields of address book,

JR   What do you mean -- "macros in all fields of address book"?

He is referring to the %AB macros which were added in v1.48.

- --
 Cheers,
 .\\arck
 
[Marck D. Pearlstone | Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA  ]
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  ]
[ PGP Key: http://www.silverstones.com/MarckPGP.asc  ]
[Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs   ]
 
TB! v1.48e S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness

iQA/AwUBOj9zFDnkJKuSnc2gEQI2RwCgkpadbj2nsWU9UUZ5Bk1leSQrYC0AoLn8
Gq8fGMcsoEORXs1jdayd5m+K
=24Iv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-11-21 Thread Chris Wilson

Tuesday, November 21, 2000, 9:35:40 AM, you wrote:


 Hello The Bat! developers,

   I'm using The Bat! Version 1.48 Beta/8
   Serial Number FE1905D5
   under Windows 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1, RC 1.1

   There are some features I would like to see in your program:

 If I want to "save a message as draft" I cannot if the To field is
 blank.
 I often write drafts (e.g. business proposals) where I still don't know
 the email address. And I cannot save the drafts, without putting a
 dummy address in.

 This doesn't seem logical. A draft is a draft.



Agreed and seconded, it would be very useful to me personally.

-- 
Best regards,
 Chris Wilson   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://www.formula3.freeserve.co.uk

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-08-11 Thread Marc

Hello Martyn,

Thursday, August 10, 2000, 10:38:19 am, you wrote:

MD Is it currently possible to define a "system-wide" set of message
MD templates that can be applied to newly created accounts within The
MD Bat! rather than having to define the templates for each new account
MD by hand every time? If not, is it possible to implement such an option
MD that would do so?

I would add: Make system wide sets of FILTERS, TEMPLATES etc with
account overrides. This allows simple creations for generic stuff for
all accounts and detailed stuff in each account.

ALSO would be nice if FROm and REPLY-TO drop downs listed all from ALL
accounts. Sometimes my business account I would like to change the (as
Eudora does) personality from business to personal etc.

-- 
Best regards,
 Marcmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-08-11 Thread Tom Plunket

Ok this is old, but I've been on the road and have something to point
out.

 - Get rid of the horizontal scroll bar - text should be fully
 wrapped within the open message window upon reading that message

I knew Steve would jump on this one.  However, at the same time, I
*personally* would like to ALWAYS wrap to window, and if I decide the
*window* needs to be wider, just make it that...

Anyway, this code came through and showed up in my preview pane
wrapped as follows:

SL sub make_date {
SL   @time = gmtime(time);
SL   my(@month) =
SL ("Jan","Feb","Mar","Apr","May","Jun","Jul","Aug","Sep","Oct","Nov","Dec");
SL   my(@dow) = ("Sun","Mon","Tue","Wed","Thu","Fri","Sat");

SL   $time[5] += 1900;
SL   my($date) = sprintf("Date: %s, %02d %s %d %02d:%02d:%02d
SL 
+",$dow[$time[6]],$time[3],$month[$time[4]],$time[5],$time[2],$time[1],$time[0]);
SL   return($date);
SL }

So this bug I've seen (in the version I'm using, anyway, 1.42f) is
that the preview pane auto-wraps, but say like with HTML messages, if
I go to the HTML view then back to "plain-text," the message is no
longer wrapped properly...


-tom!

-- 
Bah, ridiculous thing.

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-08-07 Thread Chris Wilson

Monday, August 07, 2000, 10:09:26 AM, you wrote:


 - Get rid of the horizontal scroll bar - text should be fully
 wrapped within the open message window upon reading that message

Agreed strongly, but as an option. IE, a wrap all text to window width
option, both in preview and full screen views.

Still desperate for a means of folders opening with threads fully
expanded, a simple no way, or coming soon would relieve my frustration
one way or the other :-)

 Regards,
   Martyn Drake






-- 
Best regards,
 Chrismailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://www.formula3.freeserve.co.uk

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-08-07 Thread Martyn Drake

Monday, August 07, 2000, 10:09:26 AM, you wrote:

 - The ability to hide ANY attachment

D'oh - didn't finish that sentance off properly.  I was suggesting
that perhaps it might be a better idea to put that option somewhere
like the Options menu or perhaps have an Message Preferences menu
under the Options menu, so that all settings that affect the message
window can be found in one place to offer consistancy between making
Bat-wide options to the message window rather than having to do it all
through an open message window.

I hope that makes some sort of sense to someone :)

Regards,

Martyn



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-08-07 Thread Steve Lamb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Monday, August 07, 2000, 2:09:26 AM, Martyn wrote:
 - Get rid of the horizontal scroll bar - text should be fully
 wrapped within the open message window upon reading that message

sub make_date {
  @time = gmtime(time);
  my(@month) = 
("Jan","Feb","Mar","Apr","May","Jun","Jul","Aug","Sep","Oct","Nov","Dec");
  my(@dow) = ("Sun","Mon","Tue","Wed","Thu","Fri","Sat");

  $time[5] += 1900;
  my($date) = sprintf("Date: %s, %02d %s %d %02d:%02d:%02d 
+",$dow[$time[6]],$time[3],$month[$time[4]],$time[5],$time[2],$time[1],$time[0]);
  return($date);
}

That would suck if it were wrapped, wouldn't it?  Funny thing is, the
editor doesn't have a scrollbar.  :)

- --
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
 ICQ: 5107343  | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- ---+-

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBOY7U0Hpf7K2LbpnFEQKIIACgj8yotLeWG78Mk/Yb5wy50rE4uMIAn3yL
k+F8vYC5LeFZ9mLGcLpMAnod
=eA/H
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-08-07 Thread Steve Lamb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Monday, August 07, 2000, 8:30:27 AM, Jamie wrote:
 Perl or Python? Definitely showing off.

Perl, and not showing off, just happens to be the first snippet of code I
could find over 80 characters wide to illustrate a point more effectively than
saying, "Well, you know, there are some sets of data which you don't want
wrapped.  Code, for example."

- --
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
 ICQ: 5107343  | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- ---+-

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBOY7g+Xpf7K2LbpnFEQJZUgCeIUWY0yT8ovF2uHmP+UpNw6kMgr4AnRx+
U9h1GMyOtGyqjzXeL35XbXoI
=dNx1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-08-07 Thread Curtis

On Mon, 7 Aug 2000 09:16:52 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
SL Monday, August 07, 2000, 8:30:27 AM, Jamie wrote:
 Perl or Python? Definitely showing off.

SL Perl, and not showing off, just happens to be the first snippet of
SL code I could find over 80 characters wide to illustrate a point more
SL effectively than saying, "Well, you know, there are some sets of
SL data which you don't want wrapped. Code, for example."

I personally understand your sentence above rather than the cryptic
snippet of code you posted. If it had been wrapped inappropriately, I
wouldn't have even realised. :-) I'm quite sure the majority of the
readership share the same level of familiarity with your snippet.

My showoff detector resoundingly alarmed as well. g

-- 
-=A.C. Martin=-[TB! v1.46 Beta/3 «» Win2k Pro SP1]
PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey

"Life is a series of very rude awakenings. " 

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-08-07 Thread Steve Lamb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Monday, August 07, 2000, 9:34:20 AM, Curtis wrote:
 I personally understand your sentence above rather than the cryptic
 snippet of code you posted. If it had been wrapped inappropriately, I
 wouldn't have even realised.

Point was that it would have been wrapped.  That is all that mattered.
Come to think of it I should have posted Python since whitespace matters in
that language.

- --
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
 ICQ: 5107343  | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- ---+-

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBOY7s13pf7K2LbpnFEQJG6wCg9zsntkb528Gq3FOG01CCtOCGwNMAoPyj
ktShMP5BawgMc/RIbqs296PZ
=G+V7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-04-13 Thread Thomas Fernandez

Hi Syafril,

On Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:25:55 +0700GMT (13/04/2000, 13:25 +0800GMT),
Syafril Hermansyah wrote:

SH ftp://ftp.dutaint.com/the_bat/rfc/rfc2369.txt

"Unable to locate server."

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.  

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.41
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-04-13 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

Hello Thomas Fernandez,

Responding  to  your article on Thursday, April 13, 2000 at 14:04:15 GMT
+0800 (which was 13/04/2000 13:04 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :

SH ftp://ftp.dutaint.com/the_bat/rfc/rfc2369.txt

TF "Unable to locate server."

Uh strange.
I just check by query to your NAme Server, and the result is:

 ftp.dutaint.com
Server:  hntp3.hinet.net
Address:  168.95.192.2

DNS request timed out.
timeout was 2 seconds.
ftp.dutaint.com internet address = 203.130.233.13
ftp.dutaint.com internet address = 203.130.233.2
ftp.dutaint.com internet address = 202.134.1.243
ftp.dutaint.com internet address = 202.134.1.244


but if the query to your primary DNS :
 ftp.dutaint.com
Server:  hntp1.hinet.net
Address:  168.95.192.1

DNS request timed out.
timeout was 2 seconds.
*** Request to hntp1.hinet.net timed-out

Seems like your primary DNS very busy.
Please  wait  for  a  while, and try again or change your DNS setting on
your TCP/IP setting, put your primary DNS (168.95.192.2) on top.

-- 
Best regards,

- Syafril -


Name  : Syafril Hermansyah  |Company: Duta Integrasi Pratama 
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Voice  : (62) (21) 385-1600  
FAXto : (62)(21)351-9241 key:000FAX |URL: http://www.dutaint.co.id


Using The Bat! 1.42 Beta/16
under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 

Created : Thursday, April 13, 2000, 13:25:43 GMT +0700



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-04-13 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

Hello Thomas Fernandez,

Responding  to  your article on Thursday, April 13, 2000 at 16:05:18 GMT
+0800 (which was 13/04/2000 15:05 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :

SH ftp://ftp.dutaint.com/the_bat/rfc/rfc2369.txt

TF "Unable to locate server."

TF This  error  message  I  still  get when I connect by Netscape or by
TF WinCommander.  These  proggies  use the company's LAN to connect, of
TF course.  I  know  a  bit about DUN Connections, but not enough about
TF Internet  connections  via  LAN;  I  can only set up my work station
TF correctly.  I  don't  get the SMTP server on this Exchange Server to
TF send  anything  to  email addresses outside of the company's domain,
TF i.e. the LAN, and am therefore using an extgernal SMTP server.

In  LAN, sometime the problem in the DNSServer or DNS (Cache) forwader).
Especially  for  NT  DNS,  very susceptible, sometimes lag to update DNS
cache. I am using BIND DNS for our LAN (it's freeware).

TF However,  coming  back  to the problem on hand, you have pointed out
TF that  there is some kind of problem with the LAN's connection to the
TF Internet.  While  I  have  no  problem web browsing, downloading all
TF kinds  of  stuff (Getright is running with an FTP download while I'm
TF writing  this,  and  this  time  is  the  first  time  I  have  ever
TF experienced this problem),

See above.

TF I  telnetted  into my ISP's server (hinet.net, as you have correctly
TF pointed  out - I have an email address on the LAN but I also have an
TF external  email  address  for certain reasons, but both use the same
TF ISP,  namely  Hinet,  which  is  Taiwan Telecom). From the server, I
TF ftp'ed  onto  ftp.dutaint.com, and it opened nicely (albeit I have a
TF very  slow  connection). So, the problem is somewhere in the LAN and
TF not at your side.

Last  5-days  ago  I change the DNS setting to Round Robin (just want to
know the effect), seems better I change it again to LocalNetPriority, so
that every query will get "the fastest"/nearest ip addresses.

-- 
Best regards,

- Syafril -


Name  : Syafril Hermansyah  |Company: Duta Integrasi Pratama 
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Voice  : (62) (21) 385-1600  
FAXto : (62)(21)351-9241 key:000FAX |URL: http://www.dutaint.co.id


Using The Bat! 1.42 Beta/16
under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 

Created : Thursday, April 13, 2000, 16:16:45 GMT +0700



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-04-12 Thread Oliver Sturm

Hi Syafril Hermansyah,

On Wednesday, April 12, 2000 at 5:32:14 PM you wrote:

 Nowadays,  most  of list already support RFC-2369 (including this list),
 so supporting RFC-2369 very useful.

I like the idea ;), but what is RFC-2369?


Oliver Sturm

-- 
% If I had a ( for every $ Congress spent, what would I have?
Too many ('s.
-- 
Oliver Sturm / [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Key ID: 71D86996
Fingerprint: 8085 5C52 60B8 EFBD DAD0  78B8 CE7F 38D7 71D8 6996

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-04-12 Thread Steve Lamb

Wednesday, April 12, 2000, 12:16:21 PM, Oliver wrote:
 I like the idea ;), but what is RFC-2369?

Do a yahoo search on RFC and find out.  :)

-- 
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
 ICQ: 5107343  | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
---+-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-04-12 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev

Hi there!

On 12 Apr 00, at 21:16, Oliver Sturm wrote
about "Re: The Bat! - suggestions":

  Nowadays,  most  of list already support RFC-2369 (including this list),
  so supporting RFC-2369 very useful.
 
 I like the idea ;), but what is RFC-2369?

It's the RFC that describes the "list headers" and how MUAs should deal with 
these. See the headers of each TBUDL message, you'll find the full set of list 
headers there. In theory, a MUA should automate dealing with common list 
actions, like subbing/unsubbing/getting help provided that the message carries 
these headers. Pegasus (partially) supports this functionality starting from 3.x.

Stefan announced lately he's going to add this functionality some day.

-- 
SY, Alex
(St.Petersburg, Russia)
http://mph.phys.spbu.ru/~akiselev
--- 
Thought for the day:
  If there is a 50/50 chance of something going wrong, nine
  times out of ten it will.

--- 
PGP public keys on keyservers:
0xA2194BF9 (RSA);   0x214135A2 (DH/DSS)
fingerprints:
F222 4AEF EC9F 5FA6  7515 910A 2429 9CB1 (RSA)
A677 81C9 48CF 16D1 B589  9D33 E7D5 675F 2141 35A2 (DH/DSS) 
--- 

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-04-12 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

Hello Oliver Sturm,

Responding  to  your article on Thursday, April 13, 2000 at 21:16:21 GMT
+0200 (which was 13/04/2000 2:16 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :

 Nowadays,  most  of list already support RFC-2369 (including this list),
 so supporting RFC-2369 very useful.

OS I like the idea ;), but what is RFC-2369?

Well, I saw "Alexander V. Kiselev" [EMAIL PROTECTED] already explain
(as always) clearly (your message came through when I in bed :-))

If  you  want to read it, I just upload this RFC to my FTP site, you can
download it from :

ftp://ftp.dutaint.com/the_bat/rfc/rfc2369.txt

OK,  I'm  preparing  to upload some RFC that may relate to MUA, at least
which  commonly state/post by some members here. For the time being, the
document only can be download from FTP, later I will prepare the Catalog
so that you can download it using "mail command" to our Server.

-- 
Best regards,

- Syafril -


Name  : Syafril Hermansyah  |Company: Duta Integrasi Pratama 
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Voice  : (62) (21) 385-1600  
FAXto : (62)(21)351-9241 key:000FAX |URL: http://www.dutaint.co.id


Using The Bat! 1.42 Beta/16
under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 

Created : Thursday, April 13, 2000, 11:31:39 GMT +0700

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions : Priority Level

2000-02-10 Thread Steve Lamb

Tuesday, February 08, 2000, 5:54:39 PM, Syafril wrote:
 Because  The  Bat!  already  have Mail Ticker to priorities message from
 whom  will  "more  priority"  than  others,  this "priority tag" tend to
 useless.

No, they tend to tell you how important the sender thought the message
was.  That isn't useless.  It also shouldn't be tampered with.

 I  have  an  idea  :  how if we can change "priority tag" of any message
 currently  on  folder,  and  make  it more than 3 : lowest, low, normal,
 high, highest with different color for every tag.

I have an idea, go back to Eudora.

 This will very helpful for our "To Do List folder" (prioritizing) or make
 tag for : read later, be forward to someone later with comment, notify sub
 ordinate later etc.

And as said on the Beta list, it is an email client, not an effing PIM.

-- 
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
 ICQ: 5107343  | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
---+-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! - suggestions : Priority Level

2000-02-10 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

Hello Steve Lamb,

On  Thursday,  February  10,  2000  at  02:34:57  GMT  -0800  (which was
10/02/2000 17:34 GMT +0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:

 Because  The  Bat!  already  have Mail Ticker to priorities message from
 whom  will  "more  priority"  than  others,  this "priority tag" tend to
 useless.

SL No,  they  tend  to  tell  you  how important the sender thought the
SL message was. That isn't useless. It also shouldn't be tampered with.

Why we can't set priority of my own message ?
I  know  I  can  redirect  the  message to myself to change the priority
level, but more simple and faster if the program allow that.

It's break the RFC rule ?

 I  have  an  idea  :  how if we can change "priority tag" of any message
 currently  on  folder,  and  make  it more than 3 : lowest, low, normal,
 high, highest with different color for every tag.

SL I have an idea, go back to Eudora.

Never really use it, explain why must use Eudora why not The Bat! ?
What's Eudora advantage for this things.

 This  will very helpful for our "To Do List folder" (prioritizing) or
 make  tag for : read later, be forward to someone later with comment,
 notify sub ordinate later etc.

SL And  as  said on the Beta list, it is an email client, not an effing
SL PIM.

Who said it is a PIM ?
In  1980 era, I wrote all of my to do list on paper, why not wrote on my
mail, should I buy palm pilot as you for writing simple list ?

Change the tagging flag makes The Bat bloat ?
Makes more than 3 level of priority makes The Bat bloat ?

-- 
- Syafril -

Name: Syafril Hermansyah | Company : Duta Integrasi Pratama 
Mailto  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | Voice   : (62) (21) 385-1600
URL : www.dutaint.co.id  | FAX : (62) (21) 351-9241  


Using The Bat! 1.41 Beta/3 under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 

Created : Thursday, February 10, 2000, 18:05:39

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! - suggestions : Priority Level

2000-02-10 Thread Steve Lamb

Thursday, February 10, 2000, 3:17:02 AM, Syafril wrote:
 Why we can't set priority of my own message ?

You later bounce it to someone else and they get the impression that the
original author placed an importance greater, or lesser, than what they
actually did.

 It's break the RFC rule ?

The basic rule of don't munge the data.

 I  have  an  idea  :  how if we can change "priority tag" of any message
 currently  on  folder,  and  make  it more than 3 : lowest, low, normal,
 high, highest with different color for every tag.

SL I have an idea, go back to Eudora.

 Never really use it, explain why must use Eudora why not The Bat! ?
 What's Eudora advantage for this things.

You described Eudora's priority system verbatim.

 Who said it is a PIM ?

"To-Do List"  One of the basic components of the PIM is the to-do list.

 Change the tagging flag makes The Bat bloat ?
 Makes more than 3 level of priority makes The Bat bloat ?

Why change it to 5?  Why not take the Franklin approach and have 5 major
priorities with 10 minor priorities in each!  No, wait, wait, let's go for a
scale based on currently know prime number!  Yeah!!!  Yeah  That's it!  5
levels isn't enough for me, let's go for 3249827532459872345983427

Do you get it yet?

-- 
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
 ICQ: 5107343  | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
---+-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! - suggestions : Priority Level

2000-02-10 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

Hello Steve Lamb,

On  Thursday,  February  10,  2000  at  08:28:19  GMT  -0800  (which was
10/02/2000 23:28 GMT +0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:

 Why we can't set priority of my own message ?

SL You later bounce it to someone else and they get the impression that
SL the  original  author  placed an importance greater, or lesser, than
SL what they actually did.

At  the  time  the  "high  priority"  arrive,  we  know  the author need
attention for his/her message (that is his/her priority), but after that
it  depend  on  us to decide the message is "high priority" to answer or
not, doesn't it ?

 It's break the RFC rule ?

SL The basic rule of don't munge the data.

So,  as  far as The Bat! notify us with "right priority", will not break
RFC rule.

 I have an idea : how if we can change "priority tag" of any message
 currently on folder, and make it more than 3 : lowest, low, normal,
 high, highest with different color for every tag.

SL I have an idea, go back to Eudora.

 Never really use it, explain why must use Eudora why not The Bat! ?
 What's Eudora advantage for this things.

SL You described Eudora's priority system verbatim.

Ijust   check   Eudora   Light   3.05,   you   right  it has 5 level
and  can change the tag; Netscape 4.71 5-level (can change the tag), and
Pegasus 3.12b only 2-level but have coloring and annotation (I like it).
Outlook2000  have  3,  can  change  tag, Outlook Express 5 have 3, can't
change the tag.

Any   complaint   from  Eudora/Netscape/Pegasus/Outlook200  about  this
"feature" yet ?

How about *nix MUA, such Mutt, ELM or others ?

 Who said it is a PIM ?

SL "To-Do  List"  One  of  the basic components of the PIM is the to-do
SL list.

I see, you can say as scrathpad or whatever you like :-).

But  look  :  I  send  and receive FAXes using E-mail, all office report
using e-mail (we use internal mail list here), and in the near future we
will   implement   "workflow",  so  most  of  procedure  (such  purchase
requisition, absences etc) will use e-mail transport. So it worth for me
if we have coloring system in our E-mail, at least change the tagging of
priority.

 Change the tagging flag makes The Bat bloat ?
 Makes more than 3 level of priority makes The Bat bloat ?

SL Why  change  it  to 5? Why not take the Franklin approach and have 5
SL major priorities with 10 minor priorities in each!

:-) 5 is enough for me, but if coloring and annotation like Pegasus will
appreciate.

SL No,  wait,  wait, let's go for a scale based on currently know prime
SL number!  Yeah!!!  Yeah  That's it! 5 levels isn't enough for me,
SL let's go for 3249827532459872345983427

SL Do you get it yet?

Whoaho ...

-- 
- Syafril -

Name: Syafril Hermansyah | Company : Duta Integrasi Pratama 
Mailto  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | Voice   : (62) (21) 385-1600
URL : www.dutaint.co.id  | FAX : (62) (21) 351-9241  


Using The Bat! 1.41 Beta/3 under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 

Created : Thursday, February 10, 2000, 23:49:25

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! - suggestions : Priority Level

2000-02-10 Thread Steve Lamb

Thursday, February 10, 2000, 9:34:24 AM, Syafril wrote:
SL You later bounce it to someone else and they get the impression that
SL the  original  author  placed an importance greater, or lesser, than
SL what they actually did.

 At  the  time  the  "high  priority"  arrive,  we  know  the author need
 attention for his/her message (that is his/her priority), but after that
 it  depend  on  us to decide the message is "high priority" to answer or
 not, doesn't it ?

SL You later bounce it to someone else and they get the impression that
SL the  original  author  placed an importance greater, or lesser, than
SL what they actually did.

I will continue to CP that block of text until you understand exactly it
is that was said.

 Any   complaint   from  Eudora/Netscape/Pegasus/Outlook200  about  this
 "feature" yet ?

This is TB!, not Eudora/Netscape/Pegasus/Outlook2000.  If I wanted to use
one of those abominations I would do so.  Please kindly STOP trying to make
TB! into its flawed competitors.

SL No,  wait,  wait, let's go for a scale based on currently know prime
SL number!  Yeah!!!  Yeah  That's it! 5 levels isn't enough for me,
SL let's go for 3249827532459872345983427

SL Do you get it yet?

 Whoaho ...

Apparently not.  *YOU* are happy with 5.  Someone else wants 7.  Another
person wants 23908712598137653295678.  So where do you draw the line?  How
about not starting down that path in the first place.

-- 
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
 ICQ: 5107343  | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
---+-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! - suggestions : Priority Level

2000-02-10 Thread Steve Lamb

Thursday, February 10, 2000, 11:59:42 AM, Alexander wrote:
 Anyway, I do support Steve's arguments here: you should NOT change the
 priority of the messages that are sent to you. OTOH, colour highlighting
 etc. proves to be really useful.

Which, I might add, I did support when it was spoken about on the beta
list.  :)

-- 
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
 ICQ: 5107343  | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
---+-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! - suggestions : Priority Level

2000-02-10 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev

Hi there!

On 11 Feb 00, at 0:34, Syafril Hermansyah wrote
about "Re: The Bat! - suggestions : Priority level":

 Ijust   check   Eudora   Light   3.05,   you   right  it has 5 level
 and  can change the tag; Netscape 4.71 5-level (can change the tag), and
 Pegasus 3.12b only 2-level but have coloring and annotation (I like it).

Note, that the priority of the incoming message *cannot* be changed in 
Pegasus. It just highlights the urgent messages with red and sorts them to the 
top of the folder. As for the "annotations" feature you've cited, it has nothing to 
do with the priority. It's really handy, but it doesn't mean that you change the 
message in any way. It's just "attaching" a small bit of your comments to the 
message and marking message in the folder as being annotated. It does NOT 
physically change the message being annotated, BTW.

Anyway, I do support Steve's arguments here: you should NOT change the 
priority of the messages that are sent to you. OTOH, colour highlighting etc. 
proves to be really useful.

-- 
SY, Alex
(St.Petersburg, Russia)
http://mph.phys.spbu.ru/~akiselev
--- 
Thought for the day:
  On a beautiful day like this it's hard to believe anyone can
  be unhappy -- but we'll work on it.

--- 
PGP public keys on keyservers:
0xA2194BF9 (RSA);   0x214135A2 (DH/DSS)
fingerprints:
F222 4AEF EC9F 5FA6  7515 910A 2429 9CB1 (RSA)
A677 81C9 48CF 16D1 B589  9D33 E7D5 675F 2141 35A2 (DH/DSS) 
--- 

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! - suggestions : Priority Level

2000-02-10 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

Hello Alexander V. Kiselev,

On Friday, February 11, 2000 at 22:59:42 GMT +0300 (which was 11/02/2000
2:59 GMT +0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:

 Ijust   check   Eudora   Light   3.05,   you   right  it has 5 level
 and  can change the tag; Netscape 4.71 5-level (can change the tag), and
 Pegasus 3.12b only 2-level but have coloring and annotation (I like it).

AVK Note, that the priority of the incoming message *cannot* be changed
AVK in  Pegasus.  It  just  highlights the urgent messages with red and
AVK sorts  them  to  the  top  of  the folder.

I just trying (again), it can; if we select any message then right click
we can change the status from  message properties.

AVK As for the "annotations" feature you've cited, it has nothing to do
AVK with  the priority. It's really handy, but it doesn't mean that you
AVK change the message in any way. It's just "attaching" a small bit of
AVK your  comments  to the message and marking message in the folder as
AVK being  annotated.  It  does NOT physically change the message being
AVK annotated, BTW.

Correct.

AVK Anyway,  I do support Steve's arguments here: you should NOT change
AVK the  priority  of  the  messages that are sent to you. OTOH, colour
AVK highlighting etc. proves to be really useful.

I  am still don't really understand the impact of change the priorities,
even color highlighting (or using tag/icon) acceptable for me (this more
than I expected though).

-- 
- Syafril -

Name: Syafril Hermansyah | Company : Duta Integrasi Pratama 
Mailto  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | Voice   : (62) (21) 385-1600
URL : www.dutaint.co.id  | FAX : (62) (21) 351-9241  


Using The Bat! 1.41 Beta/3 under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 

Created : Friday, February 11, 2000, 9:50:13

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! - suggestions : Priority Level

2000-02-10 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

Hello Steve Lamb,

On Friday, February 11, 2000 at 09:48:16 GMT -0800 (which was 11/02/2000
0:48 GMT +0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:

SL You later bounce it to someone else and they get the impression that
SL the  original  author  placed an importance greater, or lesser, than
SL what they actually did.

SL I  will  continue  to  CP  that  block of text until you understand
SL exactly it is that was said.

SeemsI   don't   really   understand   what's   the  meaning of your
words,  can  you explain more bit details, an example will appreciate to
give me better understanding you.

 Any   complaint   from  Eudora/Netscape/Pegasus/Outlook200  about  this
 "feature" yet ?

SL This is TB!, not Eudora/Netscape/Pegasus/Outlook2000. If I wanted to
SL use  one  of  those  abominations  I would do so. Please kindly STOP
SL trying to make TB! into its flawed competitors.

I  just  pointing  out,  most  people  out  there  acceptable with this,
eventhough  I  don't  know their reason. Perhaps some of them don't like
this, not use it, but the others need it.


-- 
- Syafril -

Name: Syafril Hermansyah | Company : Duta Integrasi Pratama 
Mailto  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | Voice   : (62) (21) 385-1600
URL : www.dutaint.co.id  | FAX : (62) (21) 351-9241  


Using The Bat! 1.41 Beta/3 under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 

Created : Friday, February 11, 2000, 9:56:05

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! - suggestions : Priority Level

2000-02-10 Thread Steve Lamb

Thursday, February 10, 2000, 7:07:56 PM, Syafril wrote:
 Seems I don't really understand what's the meaning of your words, can you
 explain more bit details, an example will appreciate to give me better
 understanding you.

The president of the company emails you about a random musing.  He sets it
low priority.  Because it is the prez you mark it as high to remember to reply
with your thoughts.  In the course of your day you mention it to a coworker
and he wants to see the exact text to help you brainstorm.  You bounce it to
him.  He sees that it is marked high and might think the prez feels it was
important when he, in fact, did not.

Moral:  Don't munge data.

-- 
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
 ICQ: 5107343  | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
---+-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! - suggestions : Priority Level

2000-02-10 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

Hello Steve Lamb,

On Friday, February 11, 2000 at 19:37:29 GMT -0800 (which was 11/02/2000
10:37 GMT +0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:

 Seems I don't really understand what's the meaning of your words, can you
 explain more bit details, an example will appreciate to give me better
 understanding you.

SL The  president  of  the company emails you about a random musing. He
SL sets  it low priority. Because it is the prez you mark it as high to
SL remember  to reply with your thoughts. In the course of your day you
SL mention  it to a coworker and he wants to see the exact text to help
SL you brainstorm. You bounce it to him. He sees that it is marked high
SL and  might  think  the prez feels it was important when he, in fact,
SL did not.

SL Moral:  Don't munge data.

Ah I see now, thanks and agree.

So coloring or using tag/flag it's OK ?(such as flag of Park message can
use  selectable flag/tag is acceptable, due not munge the data, and only
for our personal use).


-- 
- Syafril -

Name: Syafril Hermansyah | Company : Duta Integrasi Pratama 
Mailto  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | Voice   : (62) (21) 385-1600
URL : www.dutaint.co.id  | FAX : (62) (21) 351-9241  


Using The Bat! 1.41 Beta/3 under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 

Created : Friday, February 11, 2000, 10:56:29

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! - suggestions : Priority Level

2000-02-09 Thread tracer

Hello Syafril Hermansyah,
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000 13:01:03 +0700 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, February 09, 2000, 1:01:03 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Syafril Hermansyah wrote:


 Hello tracer,

ok, understood, I did the same after he mailed me telling him that the
easy way was probably to unsubscribe if the system thinks he was.
On the other hand I found it funny as they make motherboards and other
stuff and I donot mind having a look at it!!

Best regards,
 
tracer
-- 

Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request 
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! - suggestions : Priority Level

2000-02-09 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

Hello tracer,

On  Wednesday,  February  09,  2000  at  17:39:36  GMT  +0700 (which was
09/02/2000 17:39 GMT +0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:

[ ... ]

t On  the  other  hand  I  found it funny as they make motherboards and
t other stuff and I donot mind having a look at it!!

LOL...
I  and  Marck still have copy of the Advertising, do you want me to send
it to you privately ? :-).


-- 
- Syafril -

Name: Syafril Hermansyah | Company : Duta Integrasi Pratama 
Mailto  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | Voice   : (62) (21) 385-1600
URL : www.dutaint.co.id  | FAX : (62) (21) 351-9241  


Using The Bat! 1.41 Beta/3 under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 

Created : Wednesday, February 09, 2000, 18:47:39

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! - suggestions : Priority Level

2000-02-08 Thread tracer

Hello Syafril Hermansyah,
I received this letter.
It seems some things goto the wrong place so can you please check how
this  company goto onto the mailing list
quote:

-- [ From: TOTEM TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. * EMC.Ver #3.1a INTERNATIONAL ] --

Dear  Sirs:

seems  that  your  messages sent  to  a  wrong  place,  here  is  Totem 
Technology  Co.,  Ltd. --  a  Maker   for   PC  Mother  Boards.

Jimmy  Tong
 REPLY, Original message follows 

Date: Wednesday, 09-Feb-00 08:34 AM

From: tracer   \ Internet:([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To:   Allie Martin \ Internet:([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Subject: Re: Filtering not working for only one sender - the rest is OK, how
come
?

Hello Allie Martin,
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000 15:09:15  -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, February 09, 2000, 3:09:15 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Allie Martin wrote:


 On Wed, 9 Feb 2000 08:48:43 +1300, Nick Rout wrote:

 If this is a bug why doesn't someone fix it? Why are these things
 left to fester? Why dopeople pay money for software with bugs? Great
 programme, but  if the bugs don't get fixed, whats the point of
 paying for it?

 They do fix bugs but some of the deep-seated ones are being
 sat upon it would appear. I have this feeling that they are addressing
 some of these by way of version 2. In the meantime, with all the bugs,
 I do get my moneys worth out of using it. That's why I bought it and
 would by it again if needed. :)

Its the first emailer I bought and I used many


Best regards,
 
tracer
-- 

Using theBAT 1.41 / Beta1 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request 
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message
to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 REPLY, End of original message 



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! - suggestions : Priority Level

2000-02-08 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

Hello tracer,

On  Wednesday,  February  09,  2000  at  12:30:32  GMT  +0700 (which was
09/02/2000 12:30 GMT +0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:


t Hello Syafril Hermansyah,
t I received this letter.
t It seems some things goto the wrong place so can you please check how
t this  company goto onto the mailing list
t quote:

t -- [ From: TOTEM TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. * EMC.Ver #3.1a INTERNATIONAL ] --

He  (or  someone  which  use his mail address) was sending "advertising"
message to[EMAIL PROTECTED]and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  on  February  3,  2000 :-). Unfortunately
this is share account (and now, the other owner complaint us).

He already UNSUB from the list [EMAIL PROTECTED], but still exist
on  [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-(. Let's see after the traffic on TBBETA
going high. But he knows how to UNSUB after I point out the footer.

-- 
- Syafril -

Name: Syafril Hermansyah | Company : Duta Integrasi Pratama 
Mailto  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | Voice   : (62) (21) 385-1600
URL : www.dutaint.co.id  | FAX : (62) (21) 351-9241  


Using The Bat! 1.41 Beta/3 under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 

Created : Wednesday, February 09, 2000, 12:53:52

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org




Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-01-06 Thread Jason Thompson

Hello Thomas and Bat Buddies,

 Instead of Purging  Compressing every time I close The Bat!, I would
 like to have an option to Purge  Compress manually.

Hmmm. It is my understanding that only folders set to purge and compress
on exit will have this behavior, as set up in each folder's properties.
As for manual purging/compressing, there are commands to do this in the
Folder menu in the main TB window.

-- 
Unequivocally,
Jason Thompson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Borrow money from pessimists.
They don't expect it back.

The Bat! v1.38e



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--




PurgeCompress (was: Re: The Bat! - suggestions)

2000-01-06 Thread Thomas Fernandez

Hi Jason,

On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 01:23:32 -0800GMT (06/01/2000, 17:23 +0800GMT),
Jason Thompson wrote:

 Instead of Purging  Compressing every time I close The Bat!, I would
 like to have an option to Purge  Compress manually.

JT Hmmm. It is my understanding that only folders set to purge and compress
JT on exit will have this behavior, as set up in each folder's properties.
JT As for manual purging/compressing, there are commands to do this in the
JT Folder menu in the main TB window.

Correct. My wording was not precise enough. I do not want to
purgecompress each of the 43 folders individually, which I could with
the command in the folder menu. I want one mouse-click for
"purgecompress all folder that are set up for this". Incidentally,
all my folders have an old-message date, after which I want to keep
only parked messages.

I now purge  compress "on exit" - on *every* exit, that is. Maybe the
opposite of my initial suggestion should be easier to implement:
"exit" (Alt-X) versus "exit while ignoring all purgecompress set-ups"
(ALT-CRTL-X, or whatever).

-- 

Best regards,
Thomas.  

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.38e
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--




Re: PurgeCompress (was: Re: The Bat! - suggestions)

2000-01-06 Thread Oleg Zalyalov

Hello, the Bat! list recipients,

Thursday, January 06, 2000, Thomas Fernandez wrote to Jason Thompson about
PurgeCompress (was: Re: The Bat! - suggestions):

TF I want one mouse-click for "purgecompress all folder that are set
TF up for this".

Folders/Purge All Folders

-- 
Best regards,
Oleg Zalyalov. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Using The Bat! version 1.38e
  under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--




Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-01-06 Thread Juergen Frisch

 Thursday, January 06, 2000, 09:29, Thomas Fernandez wrote:

 Instead of Purging  Compressing every time I close The Bat!, I
 would like to have an option to Purge  Compress manually.

Hello Thomas,

   you can do so.

   Disable "Remove old messages" an "Compress the folder" on "general"
   tab of folder properties and have a look to the folder menue.

-- 

Best regards,

Jürgen

--
Using The Bat! 1.38e
under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--




Re: PurgeCompress (was: Re: The Bat! - suggestions)

2000-01-06 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

Hello Thomas Fernandez,

On  Thu,  6 Jan 2000 at 17:37:39 GMT +0800 [Thursday, January 06, 2000
16:37 GMT +0700], you told to the list:

[ ...]

TF I now purge  compress "on exit" - on *every* exit, that is. Maybe
TF the  opposite  of  my  initial  suggestion  should  be  easier  to
TF implement:   "exit"   (Alt-X)  versus  "exit  while  ignoring  all
TF purgecompress set-ups" (ALT-CRTL-X, or whatever).

For this, I am definitely agree.


-- 
- syafril -
Opinions expressed are only mine

Name: Syafril Hermansyah | Company : Duta Integrasi Pratama 
Mailto  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | Voice   : (62) (21) 385-1600
URL : www.dutaint.co.id  | FAX : (62) (21) 351-9241  



I am using The Bat! 1.38e (reg) under
Windows 98 Workstation 4.10 built 1998,  

Created : Thursday, January 06, 2000, 20:49:16 (+07:00 GMT)

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--




Re: PurgeCompress (was: Re: The Bat! - suggestions)

2000-01-06 Thread Thomas Fernandez

Hallo Oleg, Juergen and Stefan:

On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 14:40:26 +0400 GMT (06.01.2000, 18:40 +0800 GMT),
Oleg Zalyalov wrote:

TF I want one mouse-click for "purgecompress all folder that are set
TF up for this".

OZ Folders/Purge All Folders

Thanks to all of you. The Bat! has no many features that I actually
overlooked the one that was right under my nose. ;-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.38e
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 
using an Intel Celeron 366 Mhz, 128MB RAM



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--




Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-01-06 Thread tracer

Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 16:29:54 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 06, 2000, 3:29:54 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:

Thomas Hello The Bat! developers,

Thomas   There are some features I would like to see in your program:

Thomas Instead of Purging  Compressing every time I close The Bat!, I
Thomas would like to have an option to Purge  Compress manually.

Thomas The reason is, the "Cleaning Up" process takes a long time each
Thomas time (up to 15 minutes), and I really don't need to do it every
Thomas day.
Thomas while this in itself is a useful option we need a better
archive system where the archive doesnt automatically get opened, is accessible when
needed and per folder and can be selected per folder to have backup
criteria set.
If setup correctly you wouldnt have to do much manual backups and the
bat would be opening fast.
Esssentially the current setup is unsuitable for hundreds of emails
per day unless one goes and uses tricks. which really shouldnt be
required.
In adition a smooth working backup system is a good selling point.
Thomas Regards,
Thomas   Thomas Fernandez




Best regards,
 
tracer

Using theBAT 1.38e 
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--




Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-01-06 Thread Steve Lamb

Thursday, January 06, 2000, 12:29:54 AM, Thomas wrote:
 Instead of Purging  Compressing every time I close The Bat!, I
 would like to have an option to Purge  Compress manually.

You can do that now.

-- 
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
 ICQ: 5107343  | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
---+-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--




Re: PurgeCompress (was: Re: The Bat! - suggestions)

2000-01-06 Thread Steve Lamb

Thursday, January 06, 2000, 1:37:39 AM, Thomas wrote:
 the command in the folder menu. I want one mouse-click for
 "purgecompress all folder that are set up for this". Incidentally,
 all my folders have an old-message date, after which I want to keep
 only parked messages.

You have that.  The purge does a compress before the purge.

-- 
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
 ICQ: 5107343  | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
---+-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--




Re[2]: PurgeCompress (was: Re: The Bat! - suggestions)

2000-01-06 Thread Carsten Dreesbach

Hello Steve,

Thursday, January 06, 2000, 5:30:31 PM, you wrote:

 the command in the folder menu. I want one mouse-click for
 "purgecompress all folder that are set up for this". Incidentally,
 all my folders have an old-message date, after which I want to keep
 only parked messages.

SL You have that.  The purge does a compress before the purge.

Shouldn't  that be a purge before a compress? Otherwise, you compress,
purge,  then have empty space left over from the purge, right? Or am I
just confused again? ;]

-- 
Best regards,

 Carstenmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*---*
 Using The Bat! 1.38e under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 5
 on a PII/233, 96 MB RAM, 4 GB HDD
*---*

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--




Re: PurgeCompress (was: Re: The Bat! - suggestions)

2000-01-06 Thread Steve Lamb

Thursday, January 06, 2000, 8:57:37 AM, Carsten wrote:
 Shouldn't  that be a purge before a compress? Otherwise, you compress,
 purge,  then have empty space left over from the purge, right? Or am I
 just confused again? ;]

Hey, I just got to work and hadn't had my morning cup of Dew.  My bad.  :P

-- 
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
 ICQ: 5107343  | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
---+-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--




Re: The Bat! - suggestions

1999-12-25 Thread tracer

Hello Steve Lamb,
On Fri, 24 Dec 1999 13:34:37 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, December 25, 1999, 4:34:37 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:

Steve Hello The Bat! developers,

Steve   There are some features I would like to see in your program:

Steve There is a global purge and delete.  Would be nice to have a global purge
Steve duplicates as well for those of us (ahem) who have to merge an older message
Steve base with a newer one.

I agree, especially as after every cutoff I have MANY duplicates, one
button/menu option to remove in every box duplicates would be useful

Steve Regards,
Steve   Steve Lamb


Best regards,
 
tracer

Using theBAT 1.38e 
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--




Re: The Bat! - suggestions

1999-10-17 Thread Ali Martin

Hi all,

On Sunday, October 17, 1999, 12:56:28 AM (-5 GMT), Keith scribbled:

 May be a new button or a pull-down menu (as one under the Get mail
 button) item would be a better way then a pop-up dialog every time the
 user hits Reply?

 I hate to keep referring to other programs, but Agent and Becky! have
 SO many nice features that I hope TB would emulate

 Becky handles this one really nicely. On the bar separating the
 message list from the preview pane, there is an icon called "Check
 Addresses". If you click on this icon, it brings up the From, Sender,
 Reply-To, To, and Cc fields with their contents. Among other things,
 you can click on the addresses you want to reply to, then click on a
 "Reply to the Address" button, and you've accomplished what you
 wanted. It's very flexible.

 If you just want to reply to the Reply-To address, or Reply to All,
 there are icons for these; you don't have to use Check Addresses
 unless you want the added flexibility.

For the time being I use the reply to all option and delete the
address that I don't want to reply to. This works well for TBUDL since
it's the From and not the Sender address that is placed in the To:
field.

-- 
Regards,
 -=Ali=-   

Polls show that 9 out of 6 schizophrenics agree. 
*---*
 Using The Bat! 1.36 on Windows NT 4.0 (Service Pack 5)
*---*

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message.
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--




Re: The Bat! - suggestions

1999-10-16 Thread Andrew K. Lovetski

Hello, The Bat Users!

SL When the reply-to and from fields differ, offer the user the choice of
SL which to use.  While RFC822 states that reply-to should be used it does not
SL state that it must be used to the exclusion of from.  Furthermore, since 822
SL does allow for mailing lists to use the reply-to to redirect replies back to
SL the list by default there are times when a user will want to easily reply to
SL the originator of the message and not to the list as a whole.

May be a new button or a pull-down menu (as one under the Get mail
button) item would be a better way then a pop-up dialog every time the
user hits Reply?

-- 
Best regards,
Andrewmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! 1.36 S/N E9230B5C
under Russian Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  
on an AMD-K5-133 with 32Mb EDO 60ns RAM and 
   Samsung WNR-31601A 1.6Gb hard disk

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message.
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--




Re: The Bat! - suggestions

1999-10-16 Thread Keith Russell

Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.

On Saturday, October 16, 1999, 11:06:13 AM, Andrew wrote:

 Hello, The Bat Users!

SL When the reply-to and from fields differ, offer the user the choice of
SL which to use.  While RFC822 states that reply-to should be used it does not
SL state that it must be used to the exclusion of from.  Furthermore, since 822
SL does allow for mailing lists to use the reply-to to redirect replies back to
SL the list by default there are times when a user will want to easily reply to
SL the originator of the message and not to the list as a whole.

 May be a new button or a pull-down menu (as one under the Get mail
 button) item would be a better way then a pop-up dialog every time the
 user hits Reply?

I hate to keep referring to other programs, but Agent and Becky! have
SO many nice features that I hope TB would emulate

Becky handles this one really nicely. On the bar separating the
message list from the preview pane, there is an icon called "Check
Addresses". If you click on this icon, it brings up the From, Sender,
Reply-To, To, and Cc fields with their contents. Among other things,
you can click on the addresses you want to reply to, then click on a
"Reply to the Address" button, and you've accomplished what you
wanted. It's very flexible.

If you just want to reply to the Reply-To address, or Reply to All,
there are icons for these; you don't have to use Check Addresses
unless you want the added flexibility.

 Keith Russell
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message.
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--




Re: The Bat! - suggestions

1999-10-15 Thread Christian Gassmann

Hi!

Kevin Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] about "The Bat! - suggestions":

 PLEASE, PLEASE, make it an option as to whether the Message Management
 option to "Download header only if message size is greater than" deletes
 the message on the server or not.  I would like to be notified that there
 is a large message on the server so that I can download it when I have
 time, but the way it is right now, (at least the way it appears to work)
 the message gets deleted from the server all together.

Yes, I definitely support this request.

And another one:

Is there a hotkey to jump to the next unread message (in another
folder, if necessary)?

-- 
Christian GassmannPGP keys: RSA 0x6975E6D3 - DH/DSS 0x83BD18C5
Internet Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ UIN: 12893571

Using The Bat! 1.36
under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 5

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message.
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--




Re: The Bat! - suggestions

1999-10-15 Thread Steve Lamb

Friday, October 15, 1999, 6:11:25 AM, Anne wrote:
 A function to browse through the messages on the server while
 online; useful for reading mail while accessing an account
 remotely and want to leave the messages on the server to get the
 mail from another computer and being able to delete big files by
 selection.

This is IMAP at the full extent and the mail dispatcher currently.

-- 
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
 ICQ: 5107343  | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
---+-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message.
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--




Re: The Bat! - suggestions

1999-10-11 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

Hello Anne Kaeser,

On Monday, October 11, 1999, 9:42:42 AM you told us:


 AFAIK it's there (although I have never used it). Account
 properties/transport/more (button next to STMP server).

AK  Nope, that's only special options for SMTP authentification...

It's there.
My  Mail Server (I have set) needs POP check first before sending, and
if  I  sending  mail before check the POP, The Bat! will automatically
"logon" first (to POPServer) before sending.

But,  if  your Server use Authentification POP (APOP or MD5), there is
an  setting  in  Account|properties|transport. Or enable " allways ask
POP password".

-- 
- syafril -


Name: Syafril Hermansyah | Company : Duta Integrasi Pratama 
Mailto  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | Voice   : (62) (21) 385-1600
URL : www.dutaint.co.id  | FAX : (62) (21) 351-9241  



I am using The Bat! 1.36 registered at
Windows NT Workstation 4.0 built 1381, Service Pack 5
Created : Tuesday, October 12, 1999, 10:03:36 (GMT + 07:00)

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message.
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--