Re: WARNING(virus check bypassed): Re[2]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........? -- anyone else seeing this 'WARNING' prefix?
On Thursday, September 11, 2003, Pixie wrote... JA I don't use my comcast account for emails, I run my own server, JA so it's easier to monkey with what I want. There is a possibility JA that it Do you happen to run that on a 'home' service? I've been thinking of throwing a server back up. Their AUP is very wishy washy with regard to servers. I used to when I was using Coserv DSL. Unfortunately when I moved, I checked with comcast they said that hosting was forbidden. So it's hosted where I work. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) All true wisdom is found on T-shirts. --And in taglines. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: WARNING(virus check bypassed): Re[2]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........? -- anyone else seeing this 'WARNING' prefix?
Hallo Pixie, On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 06:56:57 -0400GMT (10-9-03, 12:56 +0200, where I live), you wrote: MW Anyway, in digest mode the header on my message looks fine to me. P Does there happen to exist a command I can grab digests for the P last day or two? Not automatically. But you could ask someone to forward those digests. I you'd like to receive them, I could forward the digests to you. Only if you ask me to, of course. It wouldn't be nice for you if several of us send you all digests since Monday. Depends a bit on your connectivity whether that would be a mere nuisance or severe problems. ;-) -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: WARNING(virus check bypassed): Re[2]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........? -- anyone else seeing this 'WARNING' prefix?
Pixie- Cool. I sneaked in under your virus check software? Got my mojo working today... Anyway, in digest mode the header on my message looks fine to me. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: WARNING(virus check bypassed): Re[2]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........? -- anyone else seeing this 'WARNING' prefix?
Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 1:27:47 AM, Pixie wrote: P about an hour or so ago a couple messages came in with this modified P subject. Not just the thread I ripped the subject from but also 1 P or 2 others has it. P ..just trying to see if my ISP has been monkeying with something on P their servers or if others on the list are also seeing the same. I've not seen any messages like that at all on the list -- Cheers, Anne Flying high with The Bat! v2.00.6 on Windows 98 4.10 Build Visit The Bat! Users' Unofficial Help Forum http://the-bat-forums.donzeigler.com Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: WARNING(virus check bypassed): Re[2]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........? -- anyone else seeing this 'WARNING' prefix?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, September 09, 2003, Pixie wrote... ..just trying to see if my ISP has been monkeying with something on their servers or if others on the list are also seeing the same. I don't use my comcast account for emails, I run my own server, so it's easier to monkey with what I want. There is a possibility that it has been done at their end as nobody else seems affected by the issue (in light of the klez/sobig/etc viruses). However, they can probably be caught with a lot of legal issues by modifying the content of mail, at least in such a visible way. Most people wouldn't notice it in the headers. - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) What happens when you get scared half to death.twice? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQA/AwUBP16l0iuD6BT4/R9zEQIAyACgpSr6h/GcTtu4VhUWErbeJ+3UG/YAoKUb dUPdK/Bg5QE4tc6PdJCkbdcb =Xau6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
