Re: lots of cookies I need to just share with folks. (aye and hello again)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello phil! On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 3:43:03 AM you wrote: a lot of stupidity snipped And what kind of troll are you?!! - -- Dierk Haasis PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.52 Beta/1 Windows 95 4.0 1212 C The graveyards are full of people who rushed in bravely but unwisely. (Terry Pratchett) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Comment: Privacy: The core element of freedom! iQA/AwUBOrcC+PTo1oA8g8dLEQKakgCfZ2rS9eGmMwSmeT0Hu6HdXJTdkxMAoIt2 sm610xQQ4h0MZ8Fmi4N5FTFB =H/Pa -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: External Browser????
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Jim! On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 4:42:07 AM you wrote: Simply double clicking on the HTML attachment icon does that. I get the new window but it doesn't display the images... just boxes with exclamation points inside of a little yellow box. Double clicking should get your browser up. If not, you have to associate your browser with *.htm/*.html files. TB! will only show images embedded and transferred within the HTML message. You need browsing capability to retrieve the non-embedded pics shown by yellow exclamation marks in TB!. - -- Dierk Haasis PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.52 Beta/1 Windows 95 4.0 1212 C Es ist viel einfacher, Kritik zu ben, als etwas anzuerkennen. (Benjamin Disraeli) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Comment: Privacy: The core element of freedom! iQA/AwUBOrcD1vTo1oA8g8dLEQImaACeImR9Jfsl1LPrgQgkICeKuKBPq+IAoJeY 6os4mr7+xQiUakqSDe+RA1W1 =75PX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hiding group recipients
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello James! On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 12:17:58 AM you wrote: Forgive me if this has been covered before. Is there a way to hide the recipients in a group mailing (mass)? 1. Use the BCC field. (If you want an address in the TO field for cosmetic reasons, just fill in your own or a dummy). 2. Got to the address book and use the "New mass mailing" under "File". for that you have to define a Quick Template. With this method every one on your "list" will get a message personally delivered (TO = addressee). - -- Dierk Haasis PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.52 Beta/1 Windows 95 4.0 1212 C Nur dem ntzt das Lob, der den Tadel zu schtzen versteht. (Robert Schumann) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Comment: Privacy: The core element of freedom! iQA/AwUBOrcCCvTo1oA8g8dLEQKT+ACg6VvfQT4XmWNknwruKq3UidUW82MAnjBm hW5fu+pJaiSRoV54ybk+2fs2 =jw1V -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[4]: Not view HTML mail?
Hi all, WK "The PROPER way to handle HTML postings is to cancel the article, ... Uppps - this was intended as private mail and should not have gone to the list. My apologies. -- Regards, Wolfgang Co-moderator TBUDL / TBBETA discussion lists writing without the moderator's hat on ;-) Using The Bat! 1.51 under Windows 95 4.0 Build B in Stadtallendorf, Germany, on a 166Mhz Cyrix, 128MB SDRAM, half SCSI system ;-) http://www.wolfgang-kynast.de/ -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[5]:(OT) Not view HTML mail?
Hello Wolfgang, On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 09:46:08GMT +0100 (which was 09:46 AM where I live) you wrote: WK Uppps - this was intended as private mail and should not have WK gone to the list. My apologies. sre ;-) -- Best regards, Andr /---\ |Eternal Tedium Sound Media Design| |http://www.eternaltedium.com | |[EMAIL PROTECTED]| |GSM: +49 162 751 8530 (sms capable)| |PGP Key ID: 0x927EF264 | \---/ -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: hiding group recipients
Hello Dierk, Thank you very much. Now the other posts make sense :) I kept looking for this mass mailing option. Tuesday, March 20, 2001, 3:08:47 AM, you wrote: DH 1. Use the BCC field. (If you want an address in the TO field for DH cosmetic reasons, just fill in your own or a dummy). DH 2. Got to the address book and use the "New mass mailing" under DH "File". for that you have to define a Quick Template. With this method DH every one on your "list" will get a message personally delivered (TO = DH addressee). DH - -- DH Dierk Haasis -- Best regards, James Senick mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Filter question (was: Regex question)
On Monday, March 19, 2001, 11:09:31 PM, Thomas wrote: z This structure is sometimes prefixed with another word or two as: z [pre1.. pren] Startword stuff in the middle Endword T No prob, as long as both keywords are in the subject somewhere, it'll T work. Thanks for the suggestion. Actually, the reason for the regex is that I want to filter ONLY if Startword is the FIRST word and Endword is the LAST word. If they are in any other positions, or if one is missing, the message is not filtered. The positions are important. It is actually a bit more complex - Startword and Endword can be one of about 3 words each. I first wanted to see if the pre part could be eliminated, and Startword recognized as the "start". Thanks, ztrader -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[3]: The return of the upgrade problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Serge Skorokhodov, On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:23:53 +0300 GMT your local time, which was Monday, March 19, 2001, 11:23:53 AM (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time, Serge Skorokhodov wrote: JAL As I said, I have experienced this problem before (somewhere JAL between 1.41 and 1.45, I think). Then it went away, and I JAL have upgraded several times without any problems at all, JAL until now. No changes has been made on my system for months. SS A couple of questions just in case: SS - do you have some other Delphi/C++Builder applications on SS your system? I've got Delphi, C++Builder and a a fair few apps written in them and they've never caused a problem. Is this a known problem? - -- Jamie Dainton On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 11:20:32 AM The Bat! 1.49 Windows 98 4.10 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=sendKey Programmers never die: They just GOSUB without RETURN. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBOrc9LIP76OeRfCgzEQLfwACfVsvABdmNq3diZBXvVEeOOHMi1WsAn03W 9mTRVEOuKAe/yrDSwNhi6nl+ =WwA8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: The return of the upgrade problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jamie, On 20 March 2001 at 11:21:10 + (which was 11:21 where I live) Jamie Dainton wrote to Serge Skorokhodov and made these points: SS - do you have some other Delphi/C++Builder applications on SS your system? JD I've got Delphi, C++Builder and a a fair few apps written in them JD and they've never caused a problem. Is this a known problem? They have always had/caused problems with window Z-order - but this is getting OT/TECH. To continue this topic it would probably be better dealt with on TBTECH since I don't believe we're talking about a common problem but a technical difficulty being experience only by Jan-Arild. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH [ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ] [Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs ] TB! v1.52 Beta/1 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt (build 04) Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness iQA/AwUBOrdG0DnkJKuSnc2gEQJIOwCbB833cl6BSfbFFpQNj5VMeQiF7asAoLOi +ZuDPmeuHcIq3IaHx3PU5wsn =0Qf6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
TB! v1.51 - Access Violation
OK Bat Fans, Here's a test. Tell me what the following means what some possible causes might be: 'Access Violation @ address BFF6BB07, Write of address 009DF750' System: Dell 8100 OS: Win Me CPU: Pentium 1.3 mgz HD: 60 gig (49 free) RAM: 384 meg I've been getting a # of error msgs on all kinds of programs I'm trying to sort them out to see if there is a common denominator. TIA -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA Using TB! v1.51 ICQ 41116329 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Strange Dial up Problems!!
I don't know whether this is a serious problem with The bat - but here goes In the Bat (Beta v1.52 exec 1 and also previous versions)) I have the Dial up networking set so that if I'm offline and want to check both of my accounts (one ordinary pop3 and the other a Yahoo mail pop account) I can connect, check for mail and automatically disconnect. But I very often have problems with timeouts waiting to connect to the mail server/s to check or send new mail etc. My dial up works fine and connects without any problems but then The Bat just sits there waiting for something to happen and eventually times out. This doesn't happen all the time, but enough to be a real nuisance. The really strange thing is that if I'm already online (from having started Internet Explorer or some other net program) and I select to check all accounts in the Bat - then there is never a problem and the checking takes literally only a second or two...every time??? How can this be? The other really strange thing is that Outlook Express 5 and Outlook 2000 don't seem to suffer this problem and rarely have trouble accessing the server first time. Any advice?? Regards Steve Harris __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation
On Monday, March 19, 2001 at 21:06:09 -0500 Jan Rifkinson wrote: I've been getting a # of error msgs on all kinds of programs I'm trying to sort them out to see if there is a common denominator. Looks like your system have been messed up pretty badly. Your hardware configuration is impressive (I envy you), but that won't prevent Windows are other mischievous software from messing it up quickly. If it's a new machine (looks like so) and you're just setting it up, I would suggest starting from scratch and do it right. I mentioned a freeware utility yesterday called InCtrl that would track your system changes, and I suggest using it from day one. For years it's always been the first thing I install after the OS, and then I track every move by every software installation. Since yours is a Dell machine, I bet many things have been preinstalled for you, right? That makes it even harder to debug. -- Best regards, Ming-Li The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 | Win2k SP1 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On March 20, 2001, at 7:49:00 AM, Ming-Li wrote: Since yours is a Dell machine, I bet many things have been preinstalled for you, right? That makes it even harder to debug. That is one reason I won't even look at an engineered System like Dell. If I were him, I would do as you say and start from scratch, and make sure not to install any of the junk that Dell may have given him in the form of CD's. I've never heard of InCtrl, but the concept is sound practise. Nick _ -=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Canada=- [ TB! v1.52 Beta 1 | Win 98 SE 4.10 A ] [ GnuPG v1.0.4-1 (MingW32) | Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE ] __ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4-1 (MingW32) - GnuPGshell v1.60 Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iD8DBQE6t34CxQKEdHuj/c4RAki2AKD6pj0TH7hsUprnaUtZmW/0YVHnSgCeN1ze wiOSKzE1I69cKyZ2Wly3NKE= =JgJ3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Strange Dial up Problems!!
Hallo Steve, On Tue, 20 Mar 2001 05:08:59 -0800 (PST) GMT (20/03/2001, 21:08 +0800 GMT), Steve Harris wrote: SH I don't know whether this is a serious problem with The bat - but here SH goes SH In the Bat (Beta v1.52 exec 1 and also previous versions)) I have the Dial SH up networking set so that if I'm offline and want to check both of my SH accounts (one ordinary pop3 and the other a Yahoo mail pop account) I can SH connect, check for mail and automatically disconnect. SH But I very often have problems with timeouts This might not help you, but I cannot confirm this problem. I have the same setting at home and it works fine. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Black holes are where God divided by zero. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation (OT)
Hi Jan On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:06:09 -0500GMT (which was 20/03/2001, 3:06 +0100GMT for me), you wrote: JR System: JR Dell 8100 JR OS: Win Me JR CPU: Pentium 1.3 mgz JR HD: 60 gig (49 free) JR RAM: 384 meg Now that's a beautifull system, but why on earth are you running Windows ME on that? Win2k would be a much better choice IMHO, unless you're really into playing games g -- Der Immer Jodelende Schweizer In Lederhosen Roel [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Speelplein Aboe http://www.aboe.zzn.com * Brevity is the soul of lingerie. Using The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 on Windows NT 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 1 with an Amd Athlon 700 @ 256 MB 96Gb Hd -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation
On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 11:30:31 -0500 Jan Rifkinson wrote: However, the two programs which seem to contribute most often to a system shut down have been Explorer 5.5 The Bat! That's why I brought this problem to the list to begin with. First it was the canvas handle error msg then the latest. If you (or anyone else) has a notion of how/why TB! might be in conflict by the error msg I supplied I'd appreciate your input. I'm no expert, but I'm afraid the error msg doesn't say much. Access violation could be caused by a bunch of things, and unless you have a debugger to see who is trying to access what in the memory, nothing much can be discerned from the msg per se. If I have to guess, the mapi32.dll installed by TB might be in conflict with other MAPI servers/clients, IF (and it's a big if) the problem is really caused by TB. It's just pure speculation, though. If I start from scratch, I'm considering a Win2000 installation which I understand is the most stable of the MS OS products. This will definitely cause me start from scratch as I'm told I will have to re-format my HD although I'm not sure why. If you want to use NTFS, reformatting your HD is a necessity. Otherwise, it's not. Still, it's a good idea. It makes sure you get rid of everything installed under WinME. (Win2k also use "%system drive\Program Files" as the default program directory, so if you mix two OS on one partition, you'll end up with a mixed c:\program file directory.) Another point to consider: you have a big HD, why not divide it into several partitions. At least, separating program partition and data partition would simplify backup jobs significantly. No matter, I'd be interested in DLing the 'InCtrl' utility if you can point me to your archived msg that relates to it as I'd like to read it. It's a free PC Magazine utility, and you'll find them on ZDNet. Mine is InCtrl5 version 1.0, which I'm not sure is the newest. (Could be, it's released last December.) If you want to use it on Win2k, make sure you get InCtrl5 or higher. Earlier versions have some minor problem with Win2k registry. (I believe some versions of InCtrl3 and InCtrl4 are still on ZDNet, because they're treated as different utilities, not different versions of the same utility--a stupid error by the naming scheme, IMHO.) Ming-Li Since yours is a Dell machine, I bet many things have been Ming-Li preinstalled for you, right? That makes it even harder to debug. A real PITA. A friend once called me for help for she couldn't connect to the Internet with her new Dell machine. I checked and found a hole on the back of the machine. It turned out they didn't install the NIC. The worst part was, the NIC was IN the machine; it's just not fixed on a expansion slot! IOW, it had been floating and banging around inside the machine all the way to her. So much for the no. 1 brand. :-) -- Best regards, Ming-Li The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 | Win2k SP1 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Jan! On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 5:30:31 PM you wrote: However, the two programs which seem to contribute most often to a system shut down have been Explorer 5.5 The Bat! That's why I brought this problem to the list to begin with. First it was the canvas handle error msg then the latest. If you (or anyone else) has a notion of how/why TB! might be in conflict by the error msg I supplied I'd appreciate your input. I can't help you directly but confirm that TB! seems to be a bit on the sensitive site concerning memory. On my machine I have a tool (FreeMem Pro) to free memory that is not used. At start up I usually free everything there is (out of 128 MB about 84 to 88 MB). If I during this process start TB! - which should not be a problem apart from taking a few more seconds - it sometimes gets an Access Violation or just plain hangs/crashes. Luckily it's only TB! and not the system, which has never crashed due to TB! as far as one can tell. If I then shut down TB! (Task Manager) and restart it, no problem anymore. Hope this will help us to find the real problem and solution. - -- Dierk Haasis PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.52 Beta/1 Windows 95 4.0 1212 C Wenn ich mir eine Art Mensch ausdenke, die allen meinen Instinkten zuwiderluft, so wird immer ein Deutscher daraus. (Friedrich Nietzsche) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Comment: Privacy: The core element of freedom! iQA/AwUBOreFxPTo1oA8g8dLEQL8KQCeOo9mgrNpqo8jhwPus/hwkJX5EgwAn1E4 KEjZrl7ogEnQLZj2Lj2TUqQD =aSaN -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation
Hallo Dierk, On Tue, 20 Mar 2001 18:30:49 +0100 GMT (21/03/2001, 01:30 +0800 GMT), Dierk Haasis wrote: DH On my machine I have a tool (FreeMem Pro) to free memory that is not DH used. At start up I usually free everything there is (out of 128 MB DH about 84 to 88 MB). If I during this process start TB! - which should DH not be a problem apart from taking a few more seconds - it sometimes DH gets an Access Violation or just plain hangs/crashes. *While* starting TB? I think you shouldn't do that - FreeMem Pro (do you have an URL?) wouldn't be able to know whether it's anything that TB needs to have in memory, so it will through it out prematurely. DH If I then shut down TB! (Task Manager) and restart it, no problem DH anymore. You see? -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. The colder the X-ray table, the more of your body is required on it. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas! On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 6:46:06 PM you wrote: *While* starting TB? I think you shouldn't do that - FreeMem Pro (do you have an URL?) wouldn't be able to know whether it's anything that TB needs to have in memory, so it will through it out prematurely. Well, actually FreeMem Pro can do this. Usually when I do it for other progs (and sometimes even TB!) there is no problem. AFAIR you can find it`s on my homepage (http://Write4U.de) under Extras/Computer/Systemhelfer. Oh, BTW, the reason I posted it for Jan *was* exactly that I should not fire up TB! during my first round of freeing memory. So what I did, was describing a controlled (more or less) experiment. - -- Dierk Haasis PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.52 Beta/1 Windows 95 4.0 1212 C If all men acted from enlightened self interest, the world would be a paradise in comparison to what it is. (Bertrand Russell) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Comment: Privacy: The core element of freedom! iQA/AwUBOreP+vTo1oA8g8dLEQKazACcCtK4zE5CM/IKCKl2hA+7jpK0jSsAoPrL bU9nynLMmeSeIVP9kDHUCld2 =l33f -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: External Browser????
On 20 Mar 2001, at 7:45, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jim, On 20 March 2001 at 22:42:07 -0500 (which was 03:42 where I live) Jim Riccardi, Jr. wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points: Simply double clicking on the HTML attachment icon does that. JRJ I get the new window but it doesn't display the images... just JRJ boxes with exclamation points inside of a little yellow box. The attachment icon can be found to the left of the plain text view of the message. It sounds to me like you're double clicking on the message in the message list and simply opening the folder view of the same message. Marck - you are right ... that is what I was doing... but I also clicked the attachment icon (message.wct) - that DOES fire up my browser but not with the message contents - just a blank page (as is set in my browser preferences) - no message, no images, nada, zip, zero, zilch!! :) And why isn't there a switch or something so that - like in Pegasus - when I double-click a message in the message list it will prompt me to open as text message or via browser?? Just curious!! I REAY Like TB - but there are still some things that are missing for me. THANX!! -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: External Browser????
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jim, On 20 March 2001 at 14:47:46 -0500 (which was 19:47 where I live) Jim Riccardi, Jr. wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points: The attachment icon can be found to the left of the plain text view of the message. It sounds to me like you're double clicking on the message in the message list message in the message list and simply opening the folder view of the same message. JRJ Marck - you are right ... that is what I was doing... but I also JRJ clicked the attachment icon (message.wct) - .wct? That's not right. What browser are you using? It should be .htm or .html. JRJ that DOES fire up my browser but not with the messagel contents - JRJ just a blank page (as is set in my browser preferences) - no JRJ message, no images, nada, zip, zero, zilch!! :) That's not TB's fault. That's your browser being incorrectly installed - hence the strange .wct extension. The default extension for mime/html encoding is .wct instead of .htm or .html. That's not right at all. JRJ And why isn't there a switch or something so that - like in JRJ Pegasus - when I double-click a message in the message list it JRJ will prompt me to open as text message or via browser?? Just JRJ curious!! Because it's not needed. The "double click the attachment" works perfectly provided that the host system is correctly set up. Much simpler really. JRJ I REAY Like TB - but there are still some things that are JRJ missing for me. THANX!! I suggest reinstalling your browser. It's not behaving very well at all - although reinstallation my not serve to correct the bad file associations. You could also try (not as a solution but to test your browser) saving the attachment (right click on it and select "Save") and trying to launch the saved version from the explorer. Try it with various extensions including .html. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH [ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ] [Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs ] TB! v1.52 Beta/1 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt (build 04) Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness iQA/AwUBOre31TnkJKuSnc2gEQKz4wCeJjit6QXSLBEWKw1imlBBcK+Bt5MAn1eE u6ZbBFw7ksyXTh6dLlWMNNqr =TUOx -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: External Browser????
On 20 Mar 2001, at 20:04, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jim, On 20 March 2001 at 14:47:46 -0500 (which was 19:47 where I live) Jim Riccardi, Jr. wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points: The attachment icon can be found to the left of the plain text view of the message. It sounds to me like you're double clicking on the message in the message list message in the message list and simply opening the folder view of the same message. JRJ Marck - you are right ... that is what I was doing... but I also JRJ clicked the attachment icon (message.wct) - .wct? That's not right. What browser are you using? It should be .htm or .html. JRJ that DOES fire up my browser but not with the messagel contents - JRJ just a blank page (as is set in my browser preferences) - no JRJ message, no images, nada, zip, zero, zilch!! :) That's not TB's fault. That's your browser being incorrectly installed - hence the strange .wct extension. The default extension for mime/html encoding is .wct instead of .htm or .html. That's not right at all. As far as my browser configuration, I have no idea - except that I have not run into any other problems with it that I know of - not saying all is well, but I haven't had a problem. What I found in the broswer setup is this... Extensions of HTML, HTM, SHTML, and WCT are associated with a MIME type of "text/html" and are "Handled By: Netscape (internal)". JRJ And why isn't there a switch or something so that - like in JRJ Pegasus - when I double-click a message in the message list it JRJ will prompt me to open as text message or via browser?? Just JRJ curious!! Because it's not needed. The "double click the attachment" works perfectly provided that the host system is correctly set up. Much simpler really. Cool - if I could only get it to work!!! :)) JRJ I REAY Like TB - but there are still some things that are JRJ missing for me. THANX!! I suggest reinstalling your browser. It's not behaving very well at all - although reinstallation my not serve to correct the bad file associations. You could also try (not as a solution but to test your browser) saving the attachment (right click on it and select "Save") and trying to launch the saved version from the explorer. Try it with various extensions including .html. OK... I have 3 areas - folder list, message list and preview area. In the preview area, the message gets displayed. It has 2 tabs... one is labeled "1" and the other is labelled "message.wct". The tab labelled "1" brings up a split area - right side contains the text message... left side has an icon and is labelled "message.wct" also. If I right-click on the icon and select the option that says "Save (message.wct)" and save it as a file with a .htm extension, then use Windows Explorer to find the file, double-click it, it comes up in Netscape the way it should - all graphics, etc. So that works... But if I double-click the icon, it fires up Netscape - but nothing appears - blank page... that's it. If I select the tab that says "message.wct", I can see the message in the preview pane - but without the images. -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: External Browser????
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jim, On 20 March 2001 at 15:35:01 -0500 (which was 20:35 where I live) Jim Riccardi, Jr. wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points: I should have mentioned that TB doesn't have a "message view" window. When you double click a message in the message list you are opening a *folder* view window. It is a view of the folder with a message list. So when you double click on the message in the main window message list, it is not an appropriate point at which to offer to launch into your browser. JRJ ... split area ... left side has an icon and is labelled JRJ "message.wct" also. If I right-click on the icon and select the JRJ option that says "Save (message.wct)" and save it as a file with JRJ a .htm extension, then use Windows Explorer to find the file, JRJ double-click it, it comes up in Netscape the way it should - all JRJ graphics, etc. So that works... But if I double-click the icon, JRJ it fires up Netscape - but nothing appears - blank page... that's JRJ it. If I select the tab that says "message.wct", I can see the JRJ message in the preview pane - but without the images. Now what about the other experiment - the one that proves the point. Save the file as message.wct and see if explorer can successfully launch it. If explorer can't then there's no way TB can either. It's because .wct should *not* be the default text/html MIME type extension but, somehow, it is. If you can fix that, it will work exactly as it supposed to. Can anyone back else me up on what's going on with this installation? Any other NetScape users able to confirm/deny the use of .wct? Perhaps something else has installed that extension and formed an incorrect association. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH [ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ] [Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs ] TB! v1.52 Beta/1 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt (build 04) Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness iQA/AwUBOrfEuznkJKuSnc2gEQIYNACbBZfC/XeBFTZj6/dJLOjec7LHOnoAoMCZ EBNoZrnxrMorSSgCGidYCFhO =0TMH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: External Browser????
Hi, All! On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 15:35:01GMT -0500 (which was 3:35 PM where I live) Jim Riccardi wrote: JRJ On 20 Mar 2001, at 20:04, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: That's not TB's fault. That's your browser being incorrectly installed - hence the strange .wct extension. The default extension for mime/html encoding is .wct instead of .htm or .html. That's not right at all. I have a very similar problem on my machine - for me, the files are being saved as "message.stm" - and stm is an extension associated with WinAmp. Is there a way short of reinstalling IE5.5 to fix the mime/html encoding default extension (or association)? Where is this information? I looked under file types in explorer and can't find anything relevant. Do I really have to go digging in the registry? Interestingly - except for the different browser (IE instead of Jim's Netscape) and different filename (message.stm instead of message.wct) we seem to be having the exact same problem. Thanks for any info! -- Best regards, Leomailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.51 on Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 5 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Moving TB from Win98 to Win2K?
I have to move The Bat 1.51 with several accounts folders, from Win98 to the new PC with Win 2000. Can I do that and is there some kind of instruction for that? Thanks for help. -- Best regards, epp mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Moving TB from Win98 to Win2K?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi epp, On 20 March 2001 at 22:41:54 +0100 (which was 21:41 where I live) epp wrote to The Bat mail list and made these points: e I have to move The Bat 1.51 with several accounts folders, from Win98 e to the new PC with Win 2000. Can I do that and is there some kind of e instruction for that? Thanks for help. This is covered in the FAQ at: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/howdoi.html#Backing%20up/moving%20The%20Bat - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH [ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ] [Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs ] TB! v1.52 Beta/1 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt (build 04) Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness iQA/AwUBOrfQvTnkJKuSnc2gEQL1OACgleq1kRHnCMT3y/Nws/0x3sdxLAcAoMce jbs3a2smH+GWMbOFreAczpg4 =Nj94 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: External Browser????
On 20 Mar 2001, at 20:59, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jim, On 20 March 2001 at 15:35:01 -0500 (which was 20:35 where I live) Jim Riccardi, Jr. wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points: I should have mentioned that TB doesn't have a "message view" window. When you double click a message in the message list you are opening a *folder* view window. It is a view of the folder with a message list. So when you double click on the message in the main window message list, it is not an appropriate point at which to offer to launch into your browser. JRJ ... split area ... left side has an icon and is labelled JRJ "message.wct" also. If I right-click on the icon and select the JRJ option that says "Save (message.wct)" and save it as a file with JRJ a .htm extension, then use Windows Explorer to find the file, JRJ double-click it, it comes up in Netscape the way it should - all JRJ graphics, etc. So that works... But if I double-click the icon, JRJ it fires up Netscape - but nothing appears - blank page... that's JRJ it. If I select the tab that says "message.wct", I can see the JRJ message in the preview pane - but without the images. Now what about the other experiment - the one that proves the point. Save the file as message.wct and see if explorer can successfully launch it. If explorer can't then there's no way TB can either. It's because .wct should *not* be the default text/html MIME type extension but, somehow, it is. If you can fix that, it will work exactly as it supposed to. I did that.. it works... it's described above... saved it with the .htm extension, double- click thru windows explorer and voila!! All is well! Can anyone back else me up on what's going on with this installation? Any other NetScape users able to confirm/deny the use of .wct? Perhaps something else has installed that extension and formed an incorrect association. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH [ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ] [Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs ] TB! v1.52 Beta/1 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt (build 04) Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness iQA/AwUBOrfEuznkJKuSnc2gEQIYNACbBZfC/XeBFTZj6/dJLOjec7LHOnoAoMCZ EBNoZrnxrMorSSgCGidYCFhO =0TMH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Strange Dial up Problems!!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Steve, Tuesday, March 20, 2001, 7:08:59 AM, you wrote: S This doesn't happen all the S time, but enough to be a real nuisance. Have you been using my machine :) Seriously, I was having the same problems, although I'm on cable. I noticed when the Bat! was deleting post along with the download process all of a sudden it would hang. I've had this problem before and I attribute it to one of 3 three things. Norton AV, my disk is fragmented over 6%, and I haven't cleaned out the registry for awhile. What one thing has to do with the other and why it seems to correlate to how the Bat! functions I couldn't tell you. I do know if I run a registry utility and clean it up, defrag my disk, and then reload The Bat! exe the problem goes away. Go figure. It seems to happen a couple times a year and the same fix always works for this machine. I defrag weekly so this problem has lessened. Oh, I also go through and delete a bunch of stuff out of my folders, that seems to help too. ( I back up or copy the folder first then do a delete of the originals) Like I said, why it happens and why this works is beyond me:) -- Cheers, Dean The Bat1.52 Beta/1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBOrfp4KWeywYix9RYEQLXQACg7Gl4t4i24FSJtOp1nTmxOeaNRpwAoPlG MAVD3px1Ac/VURS9uQLK4iQ9 =3tBI -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: External Browser????
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jim, On 20 March 2001 at 17:48:02 -0500 (which was 22:48 where I live) Jim Riccardi, Jr. wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points: Now what about the other experiment - the one that proves the point. Save the file as message.wct and see if explorer can successfully launch it. JRJ I did that.. it works... it's described above... Nononono! Save it with the **WCT** extension to prove the point! JRJ saved it with the .htm extension, double- click thru windows JRJ explorer and voila!! All is well! I know it works as htm - I knew it would (and it's why I said to do it). The point is that .wct is not a launchable extension and saving one externally and trying to launch *that* will prove it. moderator Please can you trim quotes when replying. /moderator - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH [ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ] [Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs ] TB! v1.52 Beta/1 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt (build 04) Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness iQA/AwUBOrfvnTnkJKuSnc2gEQJ3UgCfSvlVus2sSUj71+8NDTm6HlR6UfYAoPrD HYnsUB0OmFHXVGaAN2SJyxsi =oIVN -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Moving TB from Win98 to Win2K?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On March 20, 2001, at 1:50:52 PM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: This is covered in the FAQ at: Marck, aside from the instructions on the FAQ, I simply copy my entire C:\Program Files\The Bat folder to a ZIP Disk, and export the Registry Key HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT to the same ZIP Disk. When I'm ready to re-install TB! to a freshly formatted HD, I simply copy over the files and double click on the Registry File. Will the above not work when switching from 98 to Win 2K? Would seem to save the hassle of having to re-install TB!, create the dummy account and what not. Nick _ -=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Canada=- [ TB! v1.52 Beta 1 | Win 98 SE 4.10 A ] [ GnuPG v1.0.4-1 (MingW32) | Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE ] __ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4-1 (MingW32) - GnuPGshell v1.60 Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iD8DBQE6t/D+xQKEdHuj/c4RArt7AJ0Q3wlJQwj3c27zrGQ/L7ip3MMiTgCgkjO6 CKfu/X6Z2uuRABzW7Lf3SG4= =nNOF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Moving TB from Win98 to Win2K?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:08:37 -0800, Nick wrote these words of wisdom: NA Marck, aside from the instructions on the FAQ, I simply copy my NA entire C:\Program Files\The Bat folder to a ZIP Disk, and export NA the Registry Key HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT to the same ZIP NA Disk. When I'm ready to re-install TB! to a freshly formatted HD, NA I simply copy over the files and double click on the Registry NA File. NA Will the above not work when switching from 98 to Win 2K? Would NA seem to save the hassle of having to re-install TB!, create the NA dummy account and what not. Yes, it will work provided that you install TB! on a partition with the same drive letter as the one it was originally installed on. If you install it somewhere else, then you need to edit the registry file, making the necessary path changes before importing it in Win2k. - -- - Allie - ~~~ A. Curtis Martin | Moderator(TBUDL|TBBETA|TBTECH) Opinions given are mine and not necessarily those of RITLABS! ___ The Bat! v1.52 Beta/1 | Windows NT 5.00.2195 (Service Pack 1) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt (build 04) Comment: PGP Key ID: 0x57C9EB602B0717E2 (Sealed for security). iQA/AwUBOrf1EVfJ62ArBxfiEQKiogCglL9GE0TYUJwdvaG/G0c3aflcFLMAoLnt eRackDjbZhsbXqssn7VnHBnR =m8yi -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation
Hello Ming-Li, On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 09:27:14 [ -0800 GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'TB! v1.51 - Access Violation': Ming-Li If you want to use NTFS, reformatting your HD is a necessity. Ming-Li Otherwise, it's not. Still, it's a good idea. [...] Another Ming-Li point to consider: you have a big HD, why not divide it into Ming-Li several partitions. At least, separating program partition Ming-Li and data partition would simplify backup jobs significantly. Good thoughts as I ponder my next moves. Ming-Li A friend once called me for help for she couldn't connect to the Ming-Li Internet with her new Dell machine. I checked and found a hole on Ming-Li the back of the machine. It turned out they didn't install the NIC. Ming-Li The worst part was, the NIC was IN the machine; it's just not fixed Ming-Li on a expansion slot! IOW, it had been floating and banging around Ming-Li inside the machine all the way to her. So much for the no. 1 brand. Had I had this problem, the machine would have been back in Texas by now. Fortunately that's not the case but the amount of 'Dell' software that clutters this machine blows my mind. Its so intrusive useless but this discussion is for another list. Thanks for your suggestions. -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA Using TB! v1.51 ICQ 41116329 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Moving TB from Win98 to Win2K?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick, On 21 March 2001 at 16:08:37 -0800 (which was 00:08 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points: NA Marck, aside from the instructions on the FAQ, I simply copy my NA entire C:\Program Files\The Bat folder to a ZIP Disk, and export NA the Registry Key HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT to the same ZIP NA Disk. When I'm ready to re-install TB! to a freshly formatted HD, NA I simply copy over the files and double click on the Registry NA File. NA Will the above not work when switching from 98 to Win 2K? Would NA seem to save the hassle of having to re-install TB!, create the NA dummy account and what not. It won't work in one of the directions - I have a feeling it's when you go from 2k back to 98. Since the new backup and synch procedures went in for the newer versions, I added the sections to the FAQ on how to do it using the in-built functions. This save the registry-shy from fiddling with it and caters for any drive/directory changes en-route. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH [ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ] [Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs ] TB! v1.52 Beta/1 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt (build 04) Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness iQA/AwUBOrf04TnkJKuSnc2gEQJoJQCggQYo/vy2aokEBnDZrSMPHBhM8MYAoN/l mPgQ7EU/tl2SjhQYDjgFMDLu =GTxa -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Moving TB from Win98 to Win2K?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On March 20, 2001, at 4:25:53 PM, A Curtis Martin wrote: Yes, it will work provided that you install TB! on a partition with the same drive letter as the one it was originally installed on. If you install it somewhere else, then you need to edit the registry file, making the necessary path changes before importing it in Win2k. Ah, Ok thanks Allie... Will have to keep that in mind later this summer! :o) Nick _ -=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Canada=- [ TB! v1.52 Beta 1 | Win 98 SE 4.10 A ] [ GnuPG v1.0.4-1 (MingW32) | Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE ] __ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4-1 (MingW32) - GnuPGshell v1.60 Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iD8DBQE6t/ZbxQKEdHuj/c4RAgIDAJ4wpe29BmIkDZlv0TwI4/jgvLcsXQCg3nhZ R4OEs/8xnJhko/g94kmipfM= =qvHc -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: External Browser????
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, at 20:59:39 [GMT +], Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MDP Can anyone back else me up on what's going on with this installation? MDP Any other NetScape users able to confirm/deny the use of .wct? Perhaps MDP something else has installed that extension and formed an incorrect MDP association. For this machine .wct is for VisualBasic.WCTFile rather than either IE or Netscape. - From the Visual Studio CD: "WCT file A modified copy of an HTML file that the system saves after you add an HTML template file to a webclass. The WCT file is saved in the project directory for the IIS application and acts as the source file for the webitem." Shouldn't the filename be in the message somewhere? If so, the problem is with the sender's system. Mike Yetto - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=MAY:PGP_Key E-mailed using The Bat! v1.51 running on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQA/AwUBOrgC0Nkz/SR3Uv4yEQJvIACcCf9+/lxCDrX1tskDMuDH29vmlXMAn03j 1fiWibkVWf+GdMCyPqJF0FPB =ft4R -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation
Jan, I have TheBat! installed on my HP Pavilion 8754c, PIII-800/192MB/30GB, running WindowsME. I had no problems installing this application. I am currently evaluating The Bat! versus OLE 5.5 ;-) Like your DELL machine, mine came with a bunch of applications pre-installed and no stand-alone Windows ME CD-ROM (this is MS' new policy... only a set of three "restore" CD-ROMs). I do use "InCtrl 5" (do a web search and you will find it... a ZD Net application). It is a great tool to track what is being placed where and what is being changed during an installation. Sorry about the lack of info regarding your "access violation" problem, but I wanted to mention that The Bat! does work great in Windows ME. By the way, if your computer is brand new (i.e. no new stuff), it might be worthwhile to run your "DELL system restore CDs"... maybe something went awry? Bruno (Oceanside, California) - Original Message - From: "Jan Rifkinson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "TBUDL" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 6:06 PM Subject: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation OK Bat Fans, Here's a test. Tell me what the following means what some possible causes might be: 'Access Violation @ address BFF6BB07, Write of address 009DF750' System: Dell 8100 OS: Win Me CPU: Pentium 1.3 mgz HD: 60 gig (49 free) RAM: 384 meg I've been getting a # of error msgs on all kinds of programs I'm trying to sort them out to see if there is a common denominator. TIA -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA Using TB! v1.51 ICQ 41116329 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation
Jan, I have TheBat! installed on my HP Pavilion 8754c, PIII-800/192MB/30GB, running WindowsME. I had no problems installing this application. I am currently evaluating The Bat! versus OLE 5.5 ;-) Like your DELL machine, mine came with a bunch of applications pre-installed and no stand-alone Windows ME CD-ROM (this is MS' new policy... only a set of three "restore" CD-ROMs). I do use "InCtrl 5" (do a web search and you will find it... a ZD Net application). It is a great tool to track what is being placed where and what is being changed during an installation. Sorry about the lack of info regarding your "access violation" problem, but I wanted to mention that The Bat! does work great in Windows ME. By the way, if your computer is brand new (i.e. no new stuff), it might be worthwhile to run your "DELL system restore CDs"... maybe something went awry? Bruno (Oceanside, California) - Original Message - From: "Jan Rifkinson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "TBUDL" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 6:06 PM Subject: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation OK Bat Fans, Here's a test. Tell me what the following means what some possible causes might be: 'Access Violation @ address BFF6BB07, Write of address 009DF750' System: Dell 8100 OS: Win Me CPU: Pentium 1.3 mgz HD: 60 gig (49 free) RAM: 384 meg I've been getting a # of error msgs on all kinds of programs I'm trying to sort them out to see if there is a common denominator. TIA -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA Using TB! v1.51 ICQ 41116329 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: External Browser????
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mike, On 21 March 2001 at 20:24:23 -0500 (which was 01:24 where I live) Mike Yetto wrote to Marck D. Pearlstone on TBUDL and made these points: MY Shouldn't the filename be in the message somewhere? If so, the MY problem is with the sender's system. Not where the message is a mutlipart/mixed or type text/html. TB has to make up a name for the html version of the message and uses the extension which is the primary association for the MIME type in the registry. VB has clearly messed this association up and the only answer is to sort it out at the registry level. That's M$ for you! Create the standard then break it at will :-(. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH [ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ] [Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs ] TB! v1.52 Beta/1 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt (build 04) Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness iQA/AwUBOrgKBTnkJKuSnc2gEQJpeQCfWDx5ir+5byo0mttv3j3cN5dlZOwAniN+ Odsjq9xnIHjcjbZz0IslEgAz =o6CP -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation
Jan, I have TheBat! installed on my HP Pavilion 8754c, PIII-800/192MB/30GB, running WindowsME. I had no problems installing this application. I am currently evaluating The Bat! versus OLE 5.5 ;-) Like your DELL machine, mine came with a bunch of applications pre-installed and no stand-alone Windows ME CD-ROM (this is MS' new policy... only a set of three "restore" CD-ROMs). I do use "InCtrl 5" (do a web search and you will find it... a ZD Net application). It is a great tool to track what is being placed where and what is being changed during an installation. Sorry about the lack of info regarding your "access violation" problem, but I wanted to mention that The Bat! does work great in Windows ME. By the way, if your computer is brand new (i.e. no new stuff), it might be worthwhile to run your "DELL system restore CDs"... maybe something went awry? Bruno (Oceanside, California) - Original Message - From: "Jan Rifkinson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "TBUDL" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 6:06 PM Subject: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation OK Bat Fans, Here's a test. Tell me what the following means what some possible causes might be: 'Access Violation @ address BFF6BB07, Write of address 009DF750' System: Dell 8100 OS: Win Me CPU: Pentium 1.3 mgz HD: 60 gig (49 free) RAM: 384 meg I've been getting a # of error msgs on all kinds of programs I'm trying to sort them out to see if there is a common denominator. TIA -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA Using TB! v1.51 ICQ 41116329 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: External Browser????
Nononono! Save it with the **WCT** extension to prove the point! Ohh!! OK!! Did that... it fires up Netscap - but with a blank page... dat's all!! :) JRJ saved it with the .htm extension, double- click thru windows JRJ explorer and voila!! All is well! I know it works as htm - I knew it would (and it's why I said to do it). The point is that .wct is not a launchable extension and saving one externally and trying to launch *that* will prove it. It launches the browser but that's all :) -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: Moving TB from Win98 to Win2K?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 oi A! On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 19:25:53 GMT -0500 (4:25 PM in Sacramento), waiting for another fragmented packet from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 's transmission we received was: ACM Yes, it will work provided that you install TB! on a partition ACM with the same drive letter as the one it was originally installed on. ACM If you install it somewhere else, then you need to edit the registry ACM file, making the necessary path changes before importing it in Win2k. you'd also need the *same* path as well as the drive letter. example: old computer and path h:\slick\mail new computer and path f:\slicker\mailer - -- - --- The Bat!v1.52 Beta/1+SW0.9.8+LM72 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.58ckt "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" iQA/AwUBOreato+UEn6F/fguEQKtoACggHJROtIezakahB9sQb1vXRMi4ZUAn1Si 6FMUJqPrA4jOUDUF4xY6mNEF =9e0e -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry...
Sorry for the bandwidth, but I don't know what happened? My message seems to have been posted "three times". An ISP snafu? This one is being sent "once". Bruno (Oceanside, California) -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: External Browser????
Hallo Marck, On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 01:55:17 + GMT (21/03/2001, 09:55 +0800 GMT), Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MDP Not where the message is a mutlipart/mixed or type text/html. TB has MDP to make up a name for the html version of the message and uses the MDP extension which is the primary association for the MIME type in the MDP registry. TB makes the file name? I'm not sure about that. My sister sent me a .jpg file, but since she used OL, she managed to cut off the extension. I received the file without any extension, TB didn't make anything up. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. "At the Knights of Columbus dinner, they will serve the same fish as last year." Message reply created with The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: External Browser????
Hallo Leo, On Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:52:09 -0500 GMT (21/03/2001, 04:52 +0800 GMT), Leo Zelevinsky wrote: LZ I have a very similar problem on my machine - for me, the files are LZ being saved as "message.stm" - and stm is an extension associated with LZ WinAmp. Is there a way short of reinstalling IE5.5 to fix the LZ mime/html encoding default extension (or association)? Where is this LZ information? I looked under file types in explorer and can't find LZ anything relevant. Look again. That's were it should be. LZ Do I really have to go digging in the registry? HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT. File associations in alphabetical order. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Success always occurs in private, and failure in full view. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Strange Dial up Problems!!
Hi Dean, On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, at 17:36:44 -0600 you wrote: What one thing has to do with the other and why it seems to correlate to how the Bat! functions I couldn't tell you. I do know if I run a registry utility and clean it up, defrag my disk, and then reload [...] If you disable PGP line wrapping and leave the wrapping up to The Bat!, your messages will be wrapped in a more legible way ;-) -- Regards, Lars The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 |Lars Geiger | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| | PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=GetPublicKey | -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
