Re: armv7/imx: imxpcie(4) driver & device tree problem
> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 11:56:47 +0200 (CEST) > From: Mark Kettenis> > > > Time to investigate the > > > > > > sdmmc0: can't enable card > > > > > > message I see on my CuBox-i4Pro once more. > > > > I'd look at the no-1-8v property to start with (ommmc should be looking > > at ti,dual-volt before using 3.0v as well). > > > > Documented as: > > > > - no-1-8-v: when present, denotes that 1.8v card voltage is not supported on > > this system, even if the controller claims it is. > > I'll look at it, but I think the 1.8v thing doesn't apply to SDIO and > was only handled to work around an issue in the Linux sdhc code. And indeed, after doing all the mmc-pwrseq and vmmc-supply magic, I now get a response from the SDIO card: (manufacturer 0x2d0, product 0x4330)at sdmmc0 function 1 not configured (manufacturer 0x2d0, product 0x4330)at sdmmc0 function 2 not configured which indicates that we're dealing with a BCM4330 (or at least one of its family members) here.
Re: armv7/imx: imxpcie(4) driver & device tree problem
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:34:05AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 17:53:22 +1000 > > From: Jonathan Gray> > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 03:20:34AM -0400, Ian Sutton wrote: > > > I am working on a MD PCI-E driver for the armv7/imx platform. It > > > attaches via FDT/simplebus, ascertaining its physical memory addresses > > > from the fdt structure originating from the dtb files present on the > > > msdos bootloader partition. The dtb files we're using now have the > > > cubox's 'pcie' nodes disabled via a "status=disabled" property. The > > > following patches fix this in the decompiled dtb outfiles: > > > > I thought the wlan was attached to pcie but it seems it is > > actually an sdio device. > > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-microsom.dtsi > > > > /* USDHC1 - Connected to optional BRCM Wifi/BT/FM */ > > { > > pinctrl-names = "default"; > > pinctrl-0 = <_microsom_brcm_wifi _microsom_usdhc1>; > > bus-width = <4>; > > mmc-pwrseq = <_pwrseq>; > > keep-power-in-suspend; > > no-1-8-v; > > non-removable; > > vmmc-supply = <_brcm>; > > status = "okay"; > > }; > > WiFi over SDIO is quite common for these SoC-type systems. The Bay > Trail-based ASUS EeeBook I have has a similar setup. I suppose PCIe > sucks quite a bit of power even if you do proper link management. I > actually believe that Broadcom's PCIe solutions are essentially SDIO > with a PCIe to SDIO bridge on front of them. > > Time to investigate the > > sdmmc0: can't enable card > > message I see on my CuBox-i4Pro once more. > I stumbled over quite a lot SDIO-connected Broadcom FullMACs lately. The raspberry Pi 3 contains a BCM43438, some Intel HW I have has some BCM4334. I have a USB dongle with a similar chip and now the CuBox-i also contains one... I'm sure I forgot at least one other device that features that chip. I had started with some simple device attachment and firmware uploading for SDIO and USB, using the dual-licensed brcmfmac driver as reference: https://github.com/Bluerise/openbsd/compare/aecf6dba489bdcb0237695815df519e17b88a850...bcm Patrick
Re: armv7/imx: imxpcie(4) driver & device tree problem
> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 19:45:32 +1000 > From: Jonathan Gray> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:34:05AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 17:53:22 +1000 > > > From: Jonathan Gray > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 03:20:34AM -0400, Ian Sutton wrote: > > > > I am working on a MD PCI-E driver for the armv7/imx platform. It > > > > attaches via FDT/simplebus, ascertaining its physical memory addresses > > > > from the fdt structure originating from the dtb files present on the > > > > msdos bootloader partition. The dtb files we're using now have the > > > > cubox's 'pcie' nodes disabled via a "status=disabled" property. The > > > > following patches fix this in the decompiled dtb outfiles: > > > > > > I thought the wlan was attached to pcie but it seems it is > > > actually an sdio device. > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-microsom.dtsi > > > > > > /* USDHC1 - Connected to optional BRCM Wifi/BT/FM */ > > > { > > > pinctrl-names = "default"; > > > pinctrl-0 = <_microsom_brcm_wifi > > > _microsom_usdhc1>; > > > bus-width = <4>; > > > mmc-pwrseq = <_pwrseq>; > > > keep-power-in-suspend; > > > no-1-8-v; > > > non-removable; > > > vmmc-supply = <_brcm>; > > > status = "okay"; > > > }; > > > > WiFi over SDIO is quite common for these SoC-type systems. The Bay > > Trail-based ASUS EeeBook I have has a similar setup. I suppose PCIe > > sucks quite a bit of power even if you do proper link management. I > > actually believe that Broadcom's PCIe solutions are essentially SDIO > > with a PCIe to SDIO bridge on front of them. > > > > Time to investigate the > > > > sdmmc0: can't enable card > > > > message I see on my CuBox-i4Pro once more. > > I'd look at the no-1-8v property to start with (ommmc should be looking > at ti,dual-volt before using 3.0v as well). > > Documented as: > > - no-1-8-v: when present, denotes that 1.8v card voltage is not supported on > this system, even if the controller claims it is. I'll look at it, but I think the 1.8v thing doesn't apply to SDIO and was only handled to work around an issue in the Linux sdhc code.
Re: armv7/imx: imxpcie(4) driver & device tree problem
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:34:05AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 17:53:22 +1000 > > From: Jonathan Gray> > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 03:20:34AM -0400, Ian Sutton wrote: > > > I am working on a MD PCI-E driver for the armv7/imx platform. It > > > attaches via FDT/simplebus, ascertaining its physical memory addresses > > > from the fdt structure originating from the dtb files present on the > > > msdos bootloader partition. The dtb files we're using now have the > > > cubox's 'pcie' nodes disabled via a "status=disabled" property. The > > > following patches fix this in the decompiled dtb outfiles: > > > > I thought the wlan was attached to pcie but it seems it is > > actually an sdio device. > > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-microsom.dtsi > > > > /* USDHC1 - Connected to optional BRCM Wifi/BT/FM */ > > { > > pinctrl-names = "default"; > > pinctrl-0 = <_microsom_brcm_wifi _microsom_usdhc1>; > > bus-width = <4>; > > mmc-pwrseq = <_pwrseq>; > > keep-power-in-suspend; > > no-1-8-v; > > non-removable; > > vmmc-supply = <_brcm>; > > status = "okay"; > > }; > > WiFi over SDIO is quite common for these SoC-type systems. The Bay > Trail-based ASUS EeeBook I have has a similar setup. I suppose PCIe > sucks quite a bit of power even if you do proper link management. I > actually believe that Broadcom's PCIe solutions are essentially SDIO > with a PCIe to SDIO bridge on front of them. > > Time to investigate the > > sdmmc0: can't enable card > > message I see on my CuBox-i4Pro once more. I'd look at the no-1-8v property to start with (ommmc should be looking at ti,dual-volt before using 3.0v as well). Documented as: - no-1-8-v: when present, denotes that 1.8v card voltage is not supported on this system, even if the controller claims it is.
Re: armv7/imx: imxpcie(4) driver & device tree problem
> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 17:53:22 +1000 > From: Jonathan Gray> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 03:20:34AM -0400, Ian Sutton wrote: > > I am working on a MD PCI-E driver for the armv7/imx platform. It > > attaches via FDT/simplebus, ascertaining its physical memory addresses > > from the fdt structure originating from the dtb files present on the > > msdos bootloader partition. The dtb files we're using now have the > > cubox's 'pcie' nodes disabled via a "status=disabled" property. The > > following patches fix this in the decompiled dtb outfiles: > > I thought the wlan was attached to pcie but it seems it is > actually an sdio device. > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-microsom.dtsi > > /* USDHC1 - Connected to optional BRCM Wifi/BT/FM */ > { > pinctrl-names = "default"; > pinctrl-0 = <_microsom_brcm_wifi _microsom_usdhc1>; > bus-width = <4>; > mmc-pwrseq = <_pwrseq>; > keep-power-in-suspend; > no-1-8-v; > non-removable; > vmmc-supply = <_brcm>; > status = "okay"; > }; WiFi over SDIO is quite common for these SoC-type systems. The Bay Trail-based ASUS EeeBook I have has a similar setup. I suppose PCIe sucks quite a bit of power even if you do proper link management. I actually believe that Broadcom's PCIe solutions are essentially SDIO with a PCIe to SDIO bridge on front of them. Time to investigate the sdmmc0: can't enable card message I see on my CuBox-i4Pro once more.
Re: armv7/imx: imxpcie(4) driver & device tree problem
> From: Ian Sutton> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 03:20:34 -0400 (EDT) > > I am working on a MD PCI-E driver for the armv7/imx platform. Before you continue you should talk to patrick@. I believe he had some working code already.
Re: armv7/imx: imxpcie(4) driver & device tree problem
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 03:20:34AM -0400, Ian Sutton wrote: > I am working on a MD PCI-E driver for the armv7/imx platform. It > attaches via FDT/simplebus, ascertaining its physical memory addresses > from the fdt structure originating from the dtb files present on the > msdos bootloader partition. The dtb files we're using now have the > cubox's 'pcie' nodes disabled via a "status=disabled" property. The > following patches fix this in the decompiled dtb outfiles: I thought the wlan was attached to pcie but it seems it is actually an sdio device. https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-microsom.dtsi /* USDHC1 - Connected to optional BRCM Wifi/BT/FM */ { pinctrl-names = "default"; pinctrl-0 = <_microsom_brcm_wifi _microsom_usdhc1>; bus-width = <4>; mmc-pwrseq = <_pwrseq>; keep-power-in-suspend; no-1-8-v; non-removable; vmmc-supply = <_brcm>; status = "okay"; }; http://wiki.solid-run.com/doku.php?id=products:imx6:microsom:quad Wifi: 802.1 b/g/n - 2.4 Ghz / Bluetooth: V 4.0 (BCM4330) So it looks like there isn't anything attached to pcie.