Re: namespace.h
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Then I think its better to work on lldb on FreeBSD because I can't figure out the header issues right now. I will install qemu and try it out. Sorry for the bother. Whenever lldb is working on fbsd then soem experts can come in and get it working for obsd! FreeBSD supports POSIX shared memory, while OpenBSD does not. I think implementing shm_open, shm_unlink is not a trivial task, nor modifying lldb code to work around the missing functions... ciao, david
Re: namespace.h
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org wrote: We do have shmat(2) and shmdt(2). Can't you just use open(2)/unlink(2) instead of shm_open()/shm_unlink()? Bah, ignore that.
Re: namespace.h
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:49 AM, David Coppa dco...@gmail.com wrote: FreeBSD supports POSIX shared memory, while OpenBSD does not. I think implementing shm_open, shm_unlink is not a trivial task, nor modifying lldb code to work around the missing functions... We do have shmat(2) and shmdt(2). Can't you just use open(2)/unlink(2) instead of shm_open()/shm_unlink()?
Re: namespace.h
Just commented out that shm_open/unlink portion, yes yes I know its bad. But spawn.h + posix_spawn.c is absolutely needed for lldb, and it will need heavy commentary from the header guys just like the recent fenv.h changes. Otherwise, the alternative is ugly and a patch set for lldb which is more of a pain to maintain in years ahead. Its much easier to see if FreeBSD can work as close to unmodified before I revisit this issue back on tech@ to see how to bring initial support lldb in OpenBSD. Will have gained some more experience then. On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org wrote: We do have shmat(2) and shmdt(2). Can't you just use open(2)/unlink(2) instead of shm_open()/shm_unlink()? Bah, ignore that.
Re: namespace.h
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com wrote: where is a listing of all functions implemented in openbsd's libc? nm /usr/lib/libc.a ? What's the question that you're *really* trying to answer? Is src/lib/libc/include/namespace.h consist of functions not implemented or its a relic? Neither. i was looking for the equivalent of FreeBSD's file of the same name and location but in OpenBSD. Our file serves the same purpose as FreeBSD's, it's just incomplete. What do you think FreeBSD is for/does? Philip Guenther
Re: namespace.h
where is a listing of all functions implemented in openbsd's libc? nm /usr/lib/libc.a ? What's the question that you're *really* trying to answer? Just trying to see how far llvm+lldb goes in compilation. Right now its stuck because of missing spawn.h in OpenBSD. And also stuck in shm_open, shm_unlink, all of which Posix states is optional. Is it then okay for me to update namespace.h to what I can glean from /usr/src? Is src/lib/libc/include/namespace.h consist of functions not implemented or its a relic? Neither. i was looking for the equivalent of FreeBSD's file of the same name and location but in OpenBSD. Our file serves the same purpose as FreeBSD's, it's just incomplete. What do you think FreeBSD is for/does? I think FreeBSD's file is present so it can handle posix compatibility by undef all of the namespace functionality in un-namespace.h. Beyond that I haven't looked. Thanks
Re: namespace.h
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:15:49PM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote: where is a listing of all functions implemented in openbsd's libc? Is src/lib/libc/include/namespace.h consist of functions not implemented or its a relic? namespace.h is used for protecting the libc namespace. A library may overwrite many of the libc entry points and the header is used to prevent that. It is not a full enumeration of the functions implemented in libc. Joerg
namespace.h
hi, where is a listing of all functions implemented in openbsd's libc? Is src/lib/libc/include/namespace.h consist of functions not implemented or its a relic? i was looking for the equivalent of FreeBSD's file of the same name and location but in OpenBSD. thanks, amit
