Re: Request for Adding Ubuntu Kylin Archive
On 14-04-08 08:02 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: Thanks for all the discussion. I think we're getting close to an agreement here; at least the broad strokes seem to be agreed already, and we just have a few points to fine-tune, so I've begun the process with Canonical IS to get this archive brought up so that we can have it in time for 14.04. Do folks think we could get a formal decision on this by, say, Thursday April 10? I think so, I took a look at rev 10 of the Ubuntu Kylin Archive wiki, and am quite happy with it. The only change I'd like is to rephrase: The Ubuntu archive and Ubuntu Security teams act as the auditors for this repository... to perhaps: The Ubuntu archive and Ubuntu Security teams reserve the right to audit this repository... as I don't want that to imply that the teams will be actively auditing the software in that repository. It will likely only happen if something specific has been brought up. With that change, I +1 the proposal and the archive. Marc. -- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
Re: MRE for juju-core/juju-mongodb
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Marc Deslauriers marc.deslauri...@canonical.com wrote: Will all these new stable releases use the version of gccgo and/or golang gc that came with 12.04, or will they possibly require updates to newer versions also? There are no plans to /need/ to use newer version of golang. The thought is that the language is good enough as it is to uses the features that already exists. gccgo 4.9 probably will need updating to the stable/official gcc when it is released. I understand that there is still work to get ppc64el and arm64 architecture bugs fixed. As gccgo is not as performant as golang-go, we will be evaluating our options in the future, If gcc gets faster, or golang-go gains support for one of the new architectures, we may want to discuss the issue. -- Curtis Hovey Canonical Cloud Development and Operations http://launchpad.net/~sinzui -- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
Re:Re: Request for Adding Ubuntu Kylin Archive
+1. Done:). -- Regards, Jack Yu UbuntuKylin Team At 2014-04-09 20:03:41,Marc Deslauriers marc.deslauri...@canonical.com wrote: On 14-04-08 08:02 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: Thanks for all the discussion. I think we're getting close to an agreement here; at least the broad strokes seem to be agreed already, and we just have a few points to fine-tune, so I've begun the process with Canonical IS to get this archive brought up so that we can have it in time for 14.04. Do folks think we could get a formal decision on this by, say, Thursday April 10? I think so, I took a look at rev 10 of the Ubuntu Kylin Archive wiki, and am quite happy with it. The only change I'd like is to rephrase: The Ubuntu archive and Ubuntu Security teams act as the auditors for this repository... to perhaps: The Ubuntu archive and Ubuntu Security teams reserve the right to audit this repository... as I don't want that to imply that the teams will be actively auditing the software in that repository. It will likely only happen if something specific has been brought up. With that change, I +1 the proposal and the archive. Marc. -- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
Re: Request for Adding Ubuntu Kylin Archive
Steve Langasek [2014-04-07 17:47 -0700]: Packages in the repository must adhere to the Extension Repository Policy. If there is any exception, there should be a request to Ubuntu Technical Board. I think we should drop the second sentence: there should never be exceptions to the Extension Repository Policy here, but the TB can amend that policy as necessary, so it's redundant to spell this out here. +1, or changing that to Changes to the that policy need to be discussed and approved by the Ubuntu Technical Board. Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
Re: Request for Adding Ubuntu Kylin Archive
Steve Langasek [2014-04-07 17:40 -0700]: The Ubuntu Kylin team has captured this now in a wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Ubuntu%20Kylin/Ubuntu%20Kylin%20Archive Let's please iterate there. This looks mostly good to me. The one request for changing from me is to clarify free licenses; this should at least be free as in beer (i. e. redistributable without fee), but I'm not sure whether it actually means free as in speech (I suppose it doesn't?) Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
Re: [MRE] Iscsitarget 1.4.20.3+svn490 into Precise
James Page [2014-04-04 12:31 +0100]: [r499] Compatibility with 3.13 kernel (LP: #1291641). +1 from me for this, as we are planning to backpor the trusty kernel this needs to be fixed anyway. [r498] Fix backward compatibility patch rules for 3.x kernels. [r497] Fix SERVICE ACTION IN / READ CAPACITY (16) - regression from r488. These seem to be fairly normal bug fixes, and appropriate regression tests to check iscsi on both the current precise as well as the backported trusty kernel should cover these as well. And a single fix in the packaging to make the init script retry unloading of the kernel module a few times if it fails at first. Why does it fail, because the device is still busy? OOI, why does the init script need to unload the kmod at all? If it's at all avoidable, I'd rather not try that at all. I've seen kernel panics, hangs, and other nasty things when trying to unload modules, I wouldn't generally consider that safe especially in such an automatic and hard to avoid way. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) -- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
Re: Request for Adding Ubuntu Kylin Archive
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 08:03:41AM -0400, Marc Deslauriers wrote: On 14-04-08 08:02 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: Thanks for all the discussion. I think we're getting close to an agreement here; at least the broad strokes seem to be agreed already, and we just have a few points to fine-tune, so I've begun the process with Canonical IS to get this archive brought up so that we can have it in time for 14.04. Do folks think we could get a formal decision on this by, say, Thursday April 10? I think so, I took a look at rev 10 of the Ubuntu Kylin Archive wiki, and am quite happy with it. The only change I'd like is to rephrase: The Ubuntu archive and Ubuntu Security teams act as the auditors for this repository... to perhaps: The Ubuntu archive and Ubuntu Security teams reserve the right to audit this repository... as I don't want that to imply that the teams will be actively auditing the software in that repository. It will likely only happen if something specific has been brought up. With that change, I +1 the proposal and the archive. Ok, +1 from me as well for this change. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
[Bug 1297710] Re: [FFe] upload ubuntukylin-keyring into archive
One thing I have not done, however, is modernized the debian/rules in this package... which seems to be derived directly from the ubuntu- keyring package and uses an entirely pre-debhelper debian/rules. Since it's consistent with existing practice I don't think this should be a blocker for the new package, but we in Ubuntu ought to update the debian/rules in both packages at some point. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Technical Board, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297710 Title: [FFe] upload ubuntukylin-keyring into archive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntukylin/+bug/1297710/+subscriptions -- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
[Bug 1297710] Re: [FFe] upload ubuntukylin-keyring into archive
Hi folks, We have a rough consensus in the Technical Board about the way forward on this; thread starting here: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical- board/2014-April/001857.html This involves having the archive populated through Launchpad, signed with a key controlled by Canonical. I've worked with Canonical IS to generate the new key for this archive, which I'm attaching here. I have also prepared a new upload of the ubuntukylin-keyring package with this new key and have uploaded it to the Ubuntu archive. ** Attachment added: pubkey.asc https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntukylin/+bug/1297710/+attachment/4078816/+files/pubkey.asc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Technical Board, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297710 Title: [FFe] upload ubuntukylin-keyring into archive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntukylin/+bug/1297710/+subscriptions -- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
