Re: 20021223 pretest

[Axel Thimm]

Hi,

On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 08:29:30PM +0100, Thomas Esser wrote:
 A new pretest on the way to teTeX-2.0. The main change is the new
 web2c. [...]

the rpms and srpms on http://atrpms.physik.fu-berlin.de/teTeX/ have been
synced, and missing symlinks to executables fixed.

Enjoy your Xmas break. Axel.
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



msg00627/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: 20021223 pretest

[Robin Fairbairns]

pulled  pushed.  in the middle of writing cards for hand-delivery ;-)

merry christmas, and all that jazz...

robin

Re: 20021223 pretest

[Vladimir Volovich]

Hi Thomas,

TE == Thomas Esser writes:

 TE Hi, I just have uploaded a new teTeX-beta release which will soon
 TE appear on ctan, e.g.

the xdelta files for teTeX-texmf-beta and teTeX-texmfsrc-beta seem to
be wrong:

$ xdelta info teTeX-texmf-beta-20021216-20021223.xdelta
xdelta: version 1.1.1 found patch version 1.1 in 
teTeX-texmf-beta-20021216-20021223.xdelta (compressed)
xdelta: generated with a gzipped FROM file
xdelta: generated with a gzipped TO file
xdelta: output name:   teTeX-texmf-beta-20021222.tar.gz
xdelta: output length: 133140480
xdelta: output md5:805f25fbd6c143b7ef323b3e59cbb1d4
xdelta: patch from segments: 2
xdelta: MD5  Length Copies  UsedSeq?Name
xdelta: d711140cb8dd9e7f7a88bb7e006489fb 353111 10689   353111  yes (patch data)
xdelta: 07312dcddfafafe51276d4fdd0e59d3b 132915200  18684   132787369   no 
 teTeX-texmf-beta-20021216.tar.gz

note that the output name is teTeX-texmf-beta-20021222.tar.gz
instead of teTeX-texmf-beta-20021223.tar.gz

are the xdelta files wrong, or they are correct, and you just renamed
the texms and texmfsrc tarballs after making xdeltas?

Best,
v.

Re: 20021223 pretest

[Thomas Esser]

 are the xdelta files wrong, or they are correct, and you just renamed
 the texms and texmfsrc tarballs after making xdeltas?

Thanks for checking. Yes, I have just renamed the two tarballs after
creating the deltas. So, this time, everything should be ok.

Thomas