Re: [TeX-music] status of M-Tx

2002-10-04 Thread Luigi Cataldi

>Dirk wrote:
>
>
>PS  I guiltily read the sentence saying that M-Tx is still in its 1998
>state.
>

This sound like a criticism, but this wasn't my intention at all. How can I
criticize a program that I like so much and that I use daily with great
satisfaction? Just a sample. I was for a long time a "Score" (probably the
best commercial typesetting program) user. The lyrics text imput used in
Score requires a lot of time, at least 10 times more than MTX\Musixlyr way.
In order to edit a sillable you have to open two windows (in spite of fact
that Score is a totally Dos program). The "lyrics slur" sign (sinalefe) in
Score is just a little musical slur; you have to put it on the score
manually, and, if vertical space change, manually you have to fine tune its
position. MTX superiority is very clear! Thanks for this!

Luigi

___
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music



Re: [TeX-music] status of M-Tx

2002-10-02 Thread Hunsbergers


>Subject: [TeX-music] status of M-Tx

Dirk wrote:


> >PS  I guiltily read the sentence saying that M-Tx is still in its 1998
> >state.
>

... and ever since 1998 (and before!) I have continued to use it
successfully, for just what I need to do, without major problems... I wish
we could say that much about Micro$soft[ware]...

Never mind the guilt!  (Bill Gates doesn't experience guilt, I'm sure. :-)
Thanks (again!!), Dirk, for your most useful and efficient contribution to
my music typsetting needs.

Joel Hunsberger


___
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music



Re: [TeX-music] status of M-Tx

2002-10-02 Thread Maurizio Codogno

>> cheer up, Dirk. Isn't TeX in its 192 state? :-)
>
>ave pertinax?

Better Pertinax than Nero!
(8 and 9 on my laptop are a bit hard to press - it could even have
been worse, with a "12" shown in full colo(u)rs!

ciao, .mau.

___
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music



Re: [TeX-music] status of M-Tx

2002-10-02 Thread Robin Fairbairns

> >PS  I guiltily read the sentence saying that M-Tx is still in its 1998
> >state.  
> 
> cheer up, Dirk. Isn't TeX in its 192 state? :-)

ave pertinax?



[cf: http://www.roman-emperors.org/pertinax.htm ]

robin
___
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music