Re: [th-users] [OT] Spam messages from trac-hacks servers
JFTR , the same thing happened to me yesterday . #12332: Start a Profit Painting Business That Is High -+- Reporter:| Owner: olemis jess_cordell@… | Type:| Status: new Why is t.h.o server sending spam messages ? On 6/10/15, Olemis Lang ole...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:31 PM I've received a message from tho servers concerning a ticket with title similar to ... #12301: Sanal Alemden korkusuz formatta ürün sahibi olmak Artık sıkıntı değil On clicking the URL the page for the real ticket is displayed . It seems to me this is caused by spammers , isn't it ? Should you need further information to track this down please let me know to forward off the list the original message . [...] -- Regards, Olemis - @olemislc Apache™ Bloodhound contributor http://issues.apache.org/bloodhound http://blood-hound.net Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: ___ th-users mailing list th-users@lists.trac-hacks.org https://lists.trac-hacks.org/mailman/listinfo/th-users
[th-users] [OT] Spam messages from trac-hacks servers
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:31 PM I've received a message from tho servers concerning a ticket with title similar to ... #12301: Sanal Alemden korkusuz formatta ürün sahibi olmak Artık sıkıntı değil On clicking the URL the page for the real ticket is displayed . It seems to me this is caused by spammers , isn't it ? Should you need further information to track this down please let me know to forward off the list the original message . -- Regards, Olemis - @olemislc Apache™ Bloodhound contributor http://issues.apache.org/bloodhound http://blood-hound.net Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: ___ th-users mailing list th-users@lists.trac-hacks.org https://lists.trac-hacks.org/mailman/listinfo/th-users
Re: [th-users] Adoption Request - PeerReviewPlugin
Thanks ! :) Just a question . Is there a (relatively easy) way of changing owner field for these tickets ? http://trac-hacks.org/query?status=newstatus=assignedstatus=reopenedgroup=component=PeerReviewPluginorder=priority ... if we only had batch modify plugin installed enabled ... sigh / -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: ___ th-users mailing list th-users@lists.trac-hacks.org https://lists.trac-hacks.org/mailman/listinfo/th-users
[th-users] Adoption Request - PeerReviewPlugin
Hi, I'd like to adopt the following plugins : PeerReviewPlugin ( https://trac-hacks.org/ticket/10728 ) It's tagged needsadoption . I will investigate all open tickets, of course . Happy holidays ! o|:) -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: ___ th-users mailing list th-users@lists.trac-hacks.org https://lists.trac-hacks.org/mailman/listinfo/th-users
[th-users] Adoption Request - ThemeEnginePlugin
Hi, I'd like to adopt the following plugins : ThemeEnginePlugin ( https://trac-hacks.org/ticket/10456 ) It's not tagged needsadoption , but most recent changeset was committed two years ago. I would investigate all open tickets, of course . -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: ___ th-users mailing list th-users@lists.trac-hacks.org https://lists.trac-hacks.org/mailman/listinfo/th-users
Re: [th-users] Adoption Request - 5 plugins
I almost have heart attack once I noticed issues flowing into my GMail inbox . Thanks . I don't recall to be so excited any other time before ... since I was in kinder garden . :D changes will be performed asap . On 10/5/12, RjOllos ry...@physiosonics.com wrote: Olemis Lang wrote Hi, I'd like to adopt the following plugins : Hi Olemis, Permissions changes have been made for those 5 plugins. Please complete the remaining steps in AdoptingHacks: http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/AdoptingHacks -- View this message in context: http://th-users.32086.n3.nabble.com/Adoption-Request-5-plugins-tp4024686p4024687.html Sent from the th-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ th-users mailing list th-users@lists.trac-hacks.org https://lists.trac-hacks.org/mailman/listinfo/th-users -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: ___ th-users mailing list th-users@lists.trac-hacks.org https://lists.trac-hacks.org/mailman/listinfo/th-users
Re: [th-users] Hg @ TH.org after upgrade ? WAS: Upgrade to Trac 0.12
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Steffen Hoffmann hoff...@web.de wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Olemis Lang wrote: [...] Thnx , I already know. The fact is that `hgsubversion` and `hgsvn` they both use SVN under the hood so, if SVN doesn't work, nothing else will . Would you dare to enlighten us on what exactly is not working with (t-h.o) SVN and your local SVN client, please? I really could not figure it out , but I suppose it may be some kind of confictive proxy or firewall in the middle of the long way to TH.org (and any other subversion server since it doen't work with any, including python.org, * , BTW) In fact I had a hard time cloning t-h.o SVN repo with hgsvn and another one, literally took me days, while hgsubversion was a breeze pulling all into a repo that got only half as big as the regular hybrid ones in a few hours. True, it seems to utilize local SVN client for contact with SVN repo, but I fail to see a problem in this fact alone. After all, how do you expect to contact and pull from a SVN server, if not via SVN? :-) of course , I'm not saying that using SVN client under the hood is wrong , I'm just saying it doesn't work for me since long time ago ... :( -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: ___ th-users mailing list th-users@lists.trac-hacks.org https://lists.trac-hacks.org/mailman/listinfo/th-users
Re: [th-users] Hg @ TH.org after upgrade ? WAS: Upgrade to Trac 0.12
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Martin Scharrer mar...@scharrer-online.de wrote: On 09/27/2010 08:13 PM, Steffen Hoffmann wrote: Olemis Lang wrote: [...] Thnx , I already know. The fact is that `hgsubversion` and `hgsvn` they both use SVN under the hood so, if SVN doesn't work, nothing else will . Would you dare to enlighten us on what exactly is not working with (t-h.o) SVN and your local SVN client, please? In fact I had a hard time cloning t-h.o SVN repo with hgsvn and another one, literally took me days, while hgsubversion was a breeze pulling all into a repo that got only half as big as the regular hybrid ones in a few hours. Can you guys please explain to me why SVN doesn't work for you? I mean, not in a technical sense, but we you are not simply using it? What exactly is so much better in Mercurial? I don't know it at all. Briefly: - I can't interact with SVN repos. - Built-in support for branches, tags and many other features that at least until I used it , were missing in SVN - Patch queues (MQ) are a great way to develop patches by groups of people (at least much better than the current attach successive versions of the patch to ticket ) and commit them to the repos on approval . - ... Ok, it is distributed and SVN is centralized, but does this make any difference for a repository like T-H? At least the patches thing IMO , yes ... There are mostly only one or two people working on a hack. but anybody can submit patches . It isn't the Linux kernel. Maybe you don't want to change your workflow and/or learn the details of another VC software, which I really understand. I don't want to learn HG as well :-) /me using SVN for many years , until crashed and never came back ... ;o) So far I was not seeing any arguments on this list WHY hg is required (SVN does not work for me without explanation does not really count). «SVN does not work for me» in my case means there's no possible way to checkout, commit , * , cause I always get HTTP errors (gateway timeouts, forbidden, ... at random) . If you don't understand it , well, now we're two ;o) ; but the fact is that it doesn't work , and not because I don't like it . So far I don't have an explanation either , and asked to svn-users and got nothing either ... so . :-/ -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: ___ th-users mailing list th-users@lists.trac-hacks.org https://lists.trac-hacks.org/mailman/listinfo/th-users
Re: [th-users] Hg @ TH.org after upgrade ? WAS: Upgrade to Trac 0.12
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Grzegorz Sobanski s...@boktor.net wrote: * Martin Scharrer mar...@scharrer-online.de [2010-09-28 10:56]: Can you guys please explain to me why SVN doesn't work for you? I mean, not in a technical sense, but we you are not simply using it? What exactly is so much better in Mercurial? I don't know it at all. Ok, it is distributed and SVN is centralized, but does this make any difference for a repository like T-H? There are mostly only one or two people working on a hack. It isn't the Linux kernel. Exactly because it is distributed :) That means, someone does not need to have commit access to the svn repository on t-h.o to create their own branches, modifications etc. If you want to do only a simple change, a patch is sufficient, but doing something more is PITA if you can't commit during the work (you lose all the benefits of repository if you have to develop a big feture without the possibility to do commits). Second, even if you have commit access to the main svn repository, you sometimes want to have private branches, that you do not share with the world, to try, experiment, etc. Ha !!! or MQ patches ... ;o) [...] IMHO if you try hg or git, even in two people cooperation (or even individually), you just do not want to go back to the dark svn ages ;) I secnd that ! -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: ___ th-users mailing list th-users@lists.trac-hacks.org https://lists.trac-hacks.org/mailman/listinfo/th-users
Re: [th-users] Hg @ TH.org after upgrade ? WAS: Upgrade to Trac 0.12
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Michael Renzmann mrenzm...@otaku42.de wrote: Hi. Is there a chance for getting Hg repos @ TH.org in its initial upgrade stage ? Let's not reduce chances on TH upgrade. =) ok , is it possible that this will happen later ? I answer that question with a clear maybe. :) There have been suggestions to make use of Trac 0.12's feature for supporting multiple repositories and different repository types (such as git and hg besides svn) on trac-hacks.org, too. That would be a major change in how t-h.o operates, but it makes sense to think closer about whether and how this could be done and what the benefits of such a step might look like. But first things first. The upgrade to Trac 0.12 alone is a pretty big step already, and before that one didn't happen it does not make too much sense to start planning other big steps :) Ok , I agree with that !!! Even if a single repos is allowed per hack , and repos type is chosen at e.g. registration time , I'd be very happy with that . Thnx ! :o) -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: ___ th-users mailing list th-users@lists.trac-hacks.org https://lists.trac-hacks.org/mailman/listinfo/th-users
Re: [th-users] Hg @ TH.org after upgrade ? WAS: Upgrade to Trac 0.12
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Grzegorz Sobanski s...@boktor.net wrote: * anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com [2010-09-28 14:26]: [cut all mail] Ok, we probably misunderstood slightly ;) I just responded to Martin about what mercurial and git has that svn doesn't. I didn't want to compare hg and git in any way ([0]), sorry if it sounded like that. And I don't have any opinion whetver TH.org should migrate to dvcs, if someone wants to use one for their hacks, they just use some avaialable hosting solution. JFTR , an alternative might be to install some kind of Trac connector for some popular VCS hosting sites e.g. GitHub, BitBucket, SF.net ... therefore leaving the heavy repos management task to them ?? -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: ___ th-users mailing list th-users@lists.trac-hacks.org https://lists.trac-hacks.org/mailman/listinfo/th-users
[th-users] Hg @ TH.org after upgrade ? WAS: Upgrade to Trac 0.12
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Martin Scharrer mar...@scharrer-online.de wrote: On 09/26/2010 05:21 PM, Michael Renzmann wrote: Hi. Hi ! :o) * Also: Upgrade subversion server/repository to 1.6.x I'll set that on my list. However, this step requires the use of packages from Debian Backports, since Lenny usually comes with 1.5.1. Is there a chance for getting Hg repos @ TH.org in its initial upgrade stage ? By the way: what is the benefit of the new version for our purposes? It is not THAT important, but I had some problems when trying to do some branch merging. In the case of Hg I'd say : To me is very important . I can't interact with SVN 1.(5|6).* repos . PS: Good luck with upgrade ! -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: ___ th-users mailing list th-users@lists.trac-hacks.org https://lists.trac-hacks.org/mailman/listinfo/th-users
Re: [th-users] Hg @ TH.org after upgrade ? WAS: Upgrade to Trac 0.12
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:53 AM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Olemis Lang ole...@gmail.com wrote: * Also: Upgrade subversion server/repository to 1.6.x I'll set that on my list. However, this step requires the use of packages from Debian Backports, since Lenny usually comes with 1.5.1. Is there a chance for getting Hg repos @ TH.org in its initial upgrade stage ? Let's not reduce chances on TH upgrade. =) ok , is it possible that this will happen later ? In the case of Hg I'd say : To me is very important . I can't interact with SVN 1.(5|6).* repos . Poor you. :-/ Here, take a look at http://bitbucket.org/durin42/hgsubversion/wiki/Home Thnx , I already know. The fact is that `hgsubversion` and `hgsvn` they both use SVN under the hood so, if SVN doesn't work, nothing else will . I think I need some other magical links ... -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: ___ th-users mailing list th-users@lists.trac-hacks.org https://lists.trac-hacks.org/mailman/listinfo/th-users
Re: [th-users] XML-RPC temporarily turned off
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 2:48 AM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Olemis Lang ole...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all. :o) o) Quick note: there is a clever guy who seems to believe that trac-hacks.org is his private testing facility and spams the site with spanish-language dummy tickets. He did not even stop after his second account was locked down and created a third account. ggrrgrg ... :$ Well, I wanted to know when will it be enabled again . I need to perform some changes in tickets after adopting new hacks and other things, and I'd prefer to perform those changes via RPC ;o) Trac lacks a throttling component. It would be good to have it both for XML-RPC and for AccountManager. Filed issue for XmlRpcPlugin . Feel free to start discussion there to see if something can be done http://trac-hacks.org/ticket/6996 ;o) -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: On adding AMF support Trac - http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/simelo-en/~3/RDv-qDkEK_w/on-adding-amf-support-trac.html ___ th-users mailing list th-users@lists.trac-hacks.org https://lists.trac-hacks.org/mailman/listinfo/th-users
