On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Grzegorz Sobanski <[email protected]> wrote: > * Martin Scharrer <[email protected]> [2010-09-28 10:56]: >> Can you guys please explain to me why SVN doesn't work for you? I mean, >> not in a technical sense, but we you are not simply using it? >> What exactly is so much better in Mercurial? I don't know it at all. >> Ok, it is distributed and SVN is centralized, but does this make any >> difference for a repository like T-H? There are mostly only one or two >> people working on a hack. It isn't the Linux kernel. > > Exactly because it is distributed :) > That means, someone does not need to have commit access to the svn > repository on t-h.o to create their own branches, modifications etc. > If you want to do only a simple change, a patch is sufficient, > but doing something more is PITA if you can't commit during the work > (you lose all the benefits of repository if you have to develop a big > feture without the possibility to do commits). > > Second, even if you have commit access to the main svn repository, > you sometimes want to have private branches, that you do not share > with the world, to try, experiment, etc. >
Ha !!! or MQ patches ... ;o) [...] > IMHO if you try hg or git, even in two people cooperation (or even > individually), you just do not want to go back to the dark svn ages ;) > I secnd that ! -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: _______________________________________________ th-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.trac-hacks.org/mailman/listinfo/th-users
