Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: [iyer123] GOOD MORNING
Read. I had written the same in exactitude of what exactly it means and how and where your REV is reving (wild, irrational, or incoherent talk:)? KR On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 08:12, gopala krishnan wrote: > Mr Rajaram, > > Please stop your *Tamil abusing.* You are re acting. You are not reading > what Rev Mr Narayanaswamy has written. > > You do not like any body responding with query or commenting as you > expect. You do not like any member responding with correct information. > > I know you will not like my response also, after reading what Mr > Narayanaswamy wrote with proper attention. > > Pl acknowledge others knowledge. There are members with more intelligence > and caliber than you in the groups. > > *Just because you are U P S C selected IRS, it never means you are SUPER > INTELLIGENT* > > > *Gopalakrishnan former ITS 7034* > > > On Thursday, 9 May, 2024 at 05:40:17 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy < > keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Muttapayale How about you? In the list you are not there? And it is > talking about making someone happy which you have not done in your life. So > do not wag your already scissored tail. KR > > On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 03:05, Narayanaswamy Iyer > wrote: > > > Dear folks > > An abysmal ignoramus demonstrating his lack of knowledge and lack of > education is easily unmasked by his own words. Witness the > following ego-boosters, expressed in the writer's standard > drain-gutter-sewer ungrammatical broken English:- > > (1) "*These thoughts I wrote elsewhere is used here to reflect the so > easy way shown in the quote:" THE SIMPLEST TASK IS TO BE HAPPY WITH > EVERYONE" Suppose you follow what are all few things only I have given , > though I run a long one in the article I wrote, and will show how the quote > is not that easy.*" > > My comments:- > > The super-egoist K Rajaram ex-IRS 9524 propounds seven woolly-headed > nonsensical "strategies" concocted by himself in his idle moments, in order > to achieve "*f**inding happiness amidst morose or shouting characters.*" > > He, being illiterate, has never heard of, and never read of or > appreciated,and, accordingly, fails to appreciate that happiness, or bliss, > or anandam in Sanskrit, is dealt with extensively in the yajur-veda > thaiththireya upanishad. > > That indispensble piece of vedam, which is essential abhyaasam for every > braahmana (which the egoist is not), spells out the comparisons of the > amount of happiness enjoyed by the various entities. > > It starts with the assertion:-"*aanandam brahmano vidvaan.*" > > It takes as a standard the happiness (aananadam) enjoyed by an ordinary > human being. It says that the manushya-gandharvas enjoy *a hundred-fold* > that amount of happiness. > > The deva-gandarvanas enjoy a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by the > manushya-gandharvas. > > The pithrunaanjiralokalokas enjoy a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by > the deva-gandharvas. > > The aajaanajaanadevas enjoy a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by the > pithrunaanjiralokalokas. > > The karmanaa-devas enjoy a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by the > pithrunaanjiralokalokas. > > The shathankarmadevaas enjoy a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by the > karmanaa-devas. > > Indra enjoys a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by the shathan > karma-devas. > > Bruhaspathi enjoys a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by Indra. > > Prajaapathi enjoys enjoys a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by > Bruhaspathi. > > Brahma enjoys enjoys a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by Prajaapathi. > > S Narayanaswamy Iyer > > On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 11:00 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy < > keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Said easier than done is a proverb. So quotes are printed so easily but > the effort one has to follow, endure and get along will knock you out of > breadth. These thoughts I wrote elsewhere is used here to reflect the so > easy way shown in the quote:" THE SIMPLEST TASK IS TO BE HAPPY WITH > EVERYONE" Suppose you follow what are all few things only I have given , > though I run a long one in the article I wrote, and will show how the quote > is not that easy.Now: > > Finding happiness amidst morose or shouting characters can be challenging, > but to make it possible, certainly, here are some strategies: > > 1Try to understand why the characters are morose or shouting. They > might be going through difficult times or facing challenges. Recognizing > their feelings and perspective can help you empathize with them. > > 2 Practice mindfulness and cultivate inner peace. Remind yourself that > you cannot control others' behaviours but can control your own reactions. > Take deep breaths, center yourself, and focus on remaining calm. > > 3 If the characters' behaviour is affecting you negatively, consider > setting boundaries. Politely assert your needs and communicate your > boundaries. This might involve stepping away from the situation or limiting > your interactions with those characters. > > 4
Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: [iyer123] GOOD MORNING
Mr Rajaram, Please stop your Tamil abusing. You are re acting. You are not reading what Rev Mr Narayanaswamy has written. You do not like any body responding with query or commenting as you expect. You do not like any member responding with correct information. I know you will not like my response also, after reading what Mr Narayanaswamy wrote with proper attention. Pl acknowledge others knowledge. There are members with more intelligence and caliber than you in the groups. Just because you are U P S C selected IRS, it never means you are SUPER INTELLIGENT Gopalakrishnan former ITS 7034 On Thursday, 9 May, 2024 at 05:40:17 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy wrote: Muttapayale How about you? In the list you are not there? And it is talking about making someone happy which you have not done in your life. So do not wag your already scissored tail. KR On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 03:05, Narayanaswamy Iyer wrote: Dear folks An abysmal ignoramus demonstrating his lack of knowledge and lack of education is easily unmasked by his own words. Witness the following ego-boosters, expressed in the writer's standard drain-gutter-sewer ungrammatical broken English:- (1) "These thoughts I wrote elsewhere is used here to reflect the so easy way shown in the quote:" THE SIMPLEST TASK IS TO BE HAPPY WITH EVERYONE" Suppose you follow what are all few things only I have given , though I run a long one in the article I wrote, and will show how the quote is not that easy." My comments:- The super-egoist K Rajaram ex-IRS 9524 propounds seven woolly-headed nonsensical "strategies" concocted by himself in his idle moments, in order to achieve "finding happiness amidst morose or shouting characters." He, being illiterate, has never heard of, and never read of or appreciated,and, accordingly, fails to appreciate that happiness, or bliss, or anandam in Sanskrit, is dealt with extensively in the yajur-veda thaiththireya upanishad. That indispensble piece of vedam, which is essential abhyaasam for every braahmana (which the egoist is not), spells out the comparisons of the amount of happiness enjoyed by the various entities. It starts with the assertion:- "aanandam brahmano vidvaan." It takes as a standard the happiness (aananadam) enjoyed by an ordinary human being. It says that the manushya-gandharvas enjoy a hundred-fold that amount of happiness. The deva-gandarvanas enjoy a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by the manushya-gandharvas. The pithrunaanjiralokalokas enjoy a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by the deva-gandharvas. The aajaanajaanadevas enjoy a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by the pithrunaanjiralokalokas. The karmanaa-devas enjoy a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by the pithrunaanjiralokalokas. The shathankarmadevaas enjoy a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by the karmanaa-devas. Indra enjoys a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by the shathankarma-devas. Bruhaspathi enjoys a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by Indra. Prajaapathi enjoys enjoys a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by Bruhaspathi. Brahma enjoys enjoys a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by Prajaapathi. S Narayanaswamy Iyer On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 11:00 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy wrote: Said easier than done is a proverb. So quotes are printed so easily but the effort one has to follow, endure and get along will knock you out of breadth. These thoughts I wrote elsewhere is used here to reflect the so easy way shown in the quote:" THE SIMPLEST TASK IS TO BE HAPPY WITH EVERYONE" Suppose you follow what are all few things only I have given , though I run a long one in the article I wrote, and will show how the quote is not that easy.Now: Finding happiness amidst morose or shouting characters canbe challenging, but to make it possible, certainly, here are some strategies: 1 Try to understand why the characters aremorose or shouting. They might be going through difficult times or facingchallenges. Recognizing their feelings and perspective can help you empathizewith them. 2 Practice mindfulness and cultivate innerpeace. Remind yourself that you cannot control others' behaviours but cancontrol your own reactions. Take deep breaths, center yourself, and focus onremaining calm. 3 If the characters' behaviour is affecting younegatively, consider setting boundaries. Politely assert your needs andcommunicate your boundaries. This might involve stepping away from thesituation or limiting your interactions with those characters. 4 Look for positivity even in challengingsituations. Focus on things that bring you joy, such as hobbies, spending timewith loved ones, or engaging in activities that uplift your spirits. 5 Cultivate a gratitude practice by focusing onthings you're thankful for, even in difficult moments. Shifting yourperspective towards gratitude can help you find happiness amidst challenges. 6 Remember that you have the power to choose howyou
Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: [iyer123] GOOD MORNING
Muttapayale How about you? In the list you are not there? And it is talking about making someone happy which you have not done in your life. So do not wag your already scissored tail. KR On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 03:05, Narayanaswamy Iyer wrote: > > Dear folks > > An abysmal ignoramus demonstrating his lack of knowledge and lack of > education is easily unmasked by his own words. Witness the > following ego-boosters, expressed in the writer's standard > drain-gutter-sewer ungrammatical broken English:- > > (1) "*These thoughts I wrote elsewhere is used here to reflect the so > easy way shown in the quote:" THE SIMPLEST TASK IS TO BE HAPPY WITH > EVERYONE" Suppose you follow what are all few things only I have given , > though I run a long one in the article I wrote, and will show how the quote > is not that easy.*" > > My comments:- > > The super-egoist K Rajaram ex-IRS 9524 propounds seven woolly-headed > nonsensical "strategies" concocted by himself in his idle moments, in order > to achieve "*f**inding happiness amidst morose or shouting characters.*" > > He, being illiterate, has never heard of, and never read of or > appreciated,and, accordingly, fails to appreciate that happiness, or bliss, > or anandam in Sanskrit, is dealt with extensively in the yajur-veda > thaiththireya upanishad. > > That indispensble piece of vedam, which is essential abhyaasam for every > braahmana (which the egoist is not), spells out the comparisons of the > amount of happiness enjoyed by the various entities. > > It starts with the assertion:-"*aanandam brahmano vidvaan.*" > > It takes as a standard the happiness (aananadam) enjoyed by an ordinary > human being. It says that the manushya-gandharvas enjoy *a hundred-fold* > that amount of happiness. > > The deva-gandarvanas enjoy a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by the > manushya-gandharvas. > > The pithrunaanjiralokalokas enjoy a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by > the deva-gandharvas. > > The aajaanajaanadevas enjoy a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by the > pithrunaanjiralokalokas. > > The karmanaa-devas enjoy a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by the > pithrunaanjiralokalokas. > > The shathankarmadevaas enjoy a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by the > karmanaa-devas. > > Indra enjoys a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by the shathan > karma-devas. > > Bruhaspathi enjoys a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by Indra. > > Prajaapathi enjoys enjoys a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by > Bruhaspathi. > > Brahma enjoys enjoys a hundred-fold the happiness enjoyed by Prajaapathi. > > S Narayanaswamy Iyer > > On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 11:00 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy < > keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Said easier than done is a proverb. So quotes are printed so easily but >> the effort one has to follow, endure and get along will knock you out of >> breadth. These thoughts I wrote elsewhere is used here to reflect the so >> easy way shown in the quote:" THE SIMPLEST TASK IS TO BE HAPPY WITH >> EVERYONE" Suppose you follow what are all few things only I have given , >> though I run a long one in the article I wrote, and will show how the quote >> is not that easy.Now: >> >> Finding happiness amidst morose or shouting characters can be >> challenging, but to make it possible, certainly, here are some strategies: >> >> 1Try to understand why the characters are morose or shouting. They >> might be going through difficult times or facing challenges. Recognizing >> their feelings and perspective can help you empathize with them. >> >> 2 Practice mindfulness and cultivate inner peace. Remind yourself that >> you cannot control others' behaviours but can control your own reactions. >> Take deep breaths, center yourself, and focus on remaining calm. >> >> 3 If the characters' behaviour is affecting you negatively, consider >> setting boundaries. Politely assert your needs and communicate your >> boundaries. This might involve stepping away from the situation or limiting >> your interactions with those characters. >> >> 4 Look for positivity even in challenging situations. Focus on >> things that bring you joy, such as hobbies, spending time with loved ones, >> or engaging in activities that uplift your spirits. >> >> 5 Cultivate a gratitude practice by focusing on things you're >> thankful for, even in difficult moments. Shifting your perspective towards >> gratitude can help you find happiness amidst challenges. >> >> 6 Remember that you have the power to choose how you respond to >> situations. Instead of reacting impulsively to morose or shouting >> characters, respond with kindness, compassion, and understanding. >> >> 7 If you're struggling to find happiness amidst challenging >> characters, don't hesitate to seek support from friends, family, or a >> therapist. Talking about your feelings and receiving support can help you >> navigate difficult situations more effectively. >> >> Ultimately, finding happiness in
Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: [iyer123] GOOD MORNING....MY VALUABLE FREINDS OF THE FORUM
reply from a child spoiled while a kid and goes on and on On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 at 22:34, Laxminarayan Sarma < laxminarayan.sa...@gmail.com> wrote: > *IaRSe, male whore , why the hell sre you* > > *conducting a census of anuses? * > > *The more the number, the greater and wider * > > *the choice for you to lick* > > *Happy Licking, IaRSe. Tell me when you plan * > > *to lick mine. But make sure you sanitise your * > > *mouth before you got around licking * > > *people's srdeholes..* > > *May be, you may gain some intelligence* > > > > > On Mon, 5 Feb, 2024, 8:55 am Rajaram Krishnamurthy, > wrote: > >> So Narayanasamy you have so many anus so you are addressed as asses? >> >> On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 at 19:26, Narayanaswamy Iyer >> wrote: >> >>> Dear folks >>> >>> Ever-pugnacious Madras-rowdy gangster and Red Dogtown garbage-collector >>> Rajaram Krishnamurthy alias KARUPPAN-CHAAM, having stupidly tried to >>> trigger a fight with Sri Gopalakrishnan, and having lost teeth, tail, nose, >>> ears, chun and buttocks, now pleads and underlines his gargantuan idiocy:- >>> >>> "*What we think as full is not full.*" >>> >>> An unlearned, unschooled, uneducated alleged "college-degree in Physics" >>> holder whose brain is full of flatulence has room for more flatulence to be >>> pumped in, whereupon it will explode. >>> >>> *He cannot think, because as a garbage-collector has only an anus >>> instead of a brain.* >>> >>> Dear Sri Gopalakrishna, the despised disgraced dishonoured eunuch >>> Rajaram Krishnamurthy is not a snake made of coconut fibre. He is a mere >>> blood-sucking leech-louse-bedbug-flatworm without eyes, nose, ears or >>> limbs, but with only a mouth and a cloaca spewing wastage. >>> >>> S Narayanaswamy Iyer >>> >>> S >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 3:40 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy < >>> keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Will this pugnacious idiot Narayanasamy change you expect Mr VVS? Never will unless he is a really 98 year old brahmana . He is not only an idiot but an illiterate imbecile. You cannot add anything to full; if it is added that means displacement can take place. And you can add anything to anything till it will not stay there but only overflow. What we think as full is not full. That is why I also added a kural peeli pei sakadumachirum appandam sala miguthu payin; only then it is full. Stupid narayanasamy On Sat, 3 Feb 2024 at 19:49, Narayanaswamy Iyer wrote: > > Dear folks > > Once born an unmitigated idiot and a blind unlearned, unschooled, > uneducated, brain-diseased fool, for ever and a day Rajaram Krishnamurthy > alias KARUPPAN-CHAAMI remains a fool. > > Despite his alleged college degree in Physics (probably fake and > bought by bribes), the blind and dumb nitwit cannot read the original > words > in the picture:- > > "*A GLASS FULL OF MILK*". > > It is not, and never was "a glass nearly full" nor "a glass almost > full". > > As for sugar, there were three egg-shaped chocolate-brown sugar balls > at the foot of the picture, ready for immersion in the *FULL* glass. > > Ever-pugnacious Madras-rowdy gangster and Red Dogtown > garbage-collector Rajaram Krishnamurthy alias KARUPPAN-CHAAMI tries to > trigger a fight with Sri Gopalakrishnan by challenging:- > > "*My dear Gopalakrishnan, why do you flounder so much? Probably > unable to read properly? I only said displacement physics and also said > if > sugar space is there, some or more milk can also be added.*" > > This is both a flawed challenge and a flagrant lie. > > What the unemployed Red Dogtown garbage-collector actually wrote in > his typical drain-gutter-sewer ungrammatical broken English was:- > > "*W**e can add salt to buttermilk; pepper to tumbler or bowl full of > soup; so we can add anything to brim level content; and so how will we > interpret the rest as? In this quote what is forgotten is , PHYSICS IS > VITAL; DISPLACEMENT WILL BE THERE; AND TO WHAT LEVEL WITHOUT SPILLING > SUGAR > CAN BE ADDED , SO TOO MILK CAN BE ADDED*." > > So, according to the silly-goose idiot, you can add a heaped > salad-spoonful of pepper to a BOWL FULL of soup; You can bravely and > confidently at any time add a heaped salad-spoonful of salt to a MUG FULL > full of buttermilk, although "displacement will be there". > > *Significantly, he does not explicitly say, but indirectly insinuates, > "To what level, despite displacement, you can add a substantial amount of > pepper to a BOWL FULL of soup, or add a substantial amount of salt to a > MUG > FULL of buttermilk, so you can also add sugar or milk to an already full > mug of milk.*" > > S Narayanaswamy Iyer > > > > > On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 9:48 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: [iyer123] GOOD MORNING....MY VALUABLE FREINDS OF THE FORUM
Acknowledged sirGopalakrishnan On Monday, 5 February, 2024 at 11:50:36 am IST, Markendeya Yeddanapudi wrote: Sir,.Why are you reading them?I see a negative post when I see one and then delete,Period.Please just delete without reading.YM On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 11:44 AM 'gopala krishnan' via Thatha_Patty wrote: Dear friends, If any member desire to stop abuse mails in the groups, first they should compel Mr Rajaram, mentally disturbed to stop his rubbish abusing postings. One can read his today's responses, to find him totally disturbed. No mad man will admit he is MAD Gopalakrishnan On Monday, 5 February, 2024 at 10:04:39 am IST, Laxminarayan Sarma wrote: IaRSe, male whore , why the hell sre you conducting a census of anuses? The more the number, the greater and wider the choice for you to lick Happy Licking, IaRSe. Tell me when you plan to lick mine. But make sure you sanitise your mouth before you got around licking people's srdeholes.. May be, you may gain some intelligence On Mon, 5 Feb, 2024, 8:55 am Rajaram Krishnamurthy, wrote: So Narayanasamy you have so many anus so you are addressed as asses? On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 at 19:26, Narayanaswamy Iyer wrote: Dear folks Ever-pugnacious Madras-rowdy gangster and Red Dogtown garbage-collector Rajaram Krishnamurthy alias KARUPPAN-CHAAM, having stupidly tried to trigger a fight with Sri Gopalakrishnan, and having lost teeth, tail, nose, ears, chun and buttocks, now pleads and underlines his gargantuan idiocy:- "What we think as full is not full." An unlearned, unschooled, uneducated alleged "college-degree in Physics" holder whose brain is full of flatulence has room for more flatulence to be pumped in, whereupon it will explode. He cannot think, because as a garbage-collector has only an anus instead of a brain. Dear Sri Gopalakrishna, the despised disgraced dishonoured eunuch Rajaram Krishnamurthy is not a snake made of coconut fibre. He is a mere blood-sucking leech-louse-bedbug-flatworm without eyes, nose, ears or limbs, but with only a mouth and a cloaca spewing wastage. S Narayanaswamy Iyer S On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 3:40 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy wrote: Will this pugnacious idiot Narayanasamy change you expect Mr VVS? Never will unless he is a really 98 year old brahmana . He is not only an idiot but an illiterate imbecile. You cannot add anything to full; if it is added that means displacement can take place. And you can add anything to anything till it will not stay there but only overflow. What we think as full is not full. That is why I also added a kural peeli pei sakadumachirum appandam sala miguthu payin; only then it is full. Stupid narayanasamy On Sat, 3 Feb 2024 at 19:49, Narayanaswamy Iyer wrote: Dear folks Once born an unmitigated idiot and a blind unlearned, unschooled, uneducated, brain-diseased fool, for ever and a day Rajaram Krishnamurthy alias KARUPPAN-CHAAMI remains a fool. Despite his alleged college degree in Physics (probably fake and bought by bribes), the blind and dumb nitwit cannot read the original words in the picture:- "A GLASS FULL OF MILK". It is not, and never was "a glass nearly full" nor "a glass almost full". As for sugar, there were three egg-shaped chocolate-brown sugar balls at the foot of the picture, ready for immersion in the FULL glass. Ever-pugnacious Madras-rowdy gangster and Red Dogtown garbage-collector Rajaram Krishnamurthy alias KARUPPAN-CHAAMI tries to trigger a fight with Sri Gopalakrishnan by challenging:- "My dear Gopalakrishnan, why do you flounder so much? Probably unable to read properly? I only said displacement physics and also said if sugar space is there, some or more milk can also be added." This is both a flawed challenge and a flagrant lie. What the unemployed Red Dogtown garbage-collector actually wrote in his typical drain-gutter-sewer ungrammatical broken English was:- "We can add salt to buttermilk; pepper to tumbler or bowl full of soup; so we can add anything to brim level content; and so how will we interpret the rest as? In this quote what is forgotten is , PHYSICS IS VITAL; DISPLACEMENT WILL BE THERE; AND TO WHAT LEVEL WITHOUT SPILLING SUGAR CAN BE ADDED , SO TOO MILK CAN BE ADDED." So, according to the silly-goose idiot, you can add a heaped salad-spoonful of pepper to a BOWL FULL of soup; You can bravely and confidently at any time add a heaped salad-spoonful of salt to a MUG FULL full of buttermilk, although "displacement will be there". Significantly, he does not explicitly say, but indirectly insinuates, "To what level, despite displacement, you can add a substantial amount of pepper to a BOWL FULL of soup, or add a substantial amount of salt to a MUG FULL of buttermilk, so you can also add sugar or milk to an already full mug of milk." S Narayanaswamy Iyer On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 9:48 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy wrote: My dear Gopalakrishnan, why do you flounder so much?
Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: [iyer123] GOOD MORNING....MY VALUABLE FREINDS OF THE FORUM
Dear friends, If any member desire to stop abuse mails in the groups, first they should compel Mr Rajaram, mentally disturbed to stop his rubbish abusing postings. One can read his today's responses, to find him totally disturbed. No mad man will admit he is MAD Gopalakrishnan On Monday, 5 February, 2024 at 10:04:39 am IST, Laxminarayan Sarma wrote: IaRSe, male whore , why the hell sre you conducting a census of anuses? The more the number, the greater and wider the choice for you to lick Happy Licking, IaRSe. Tell me when you plan to lick mine. But make sure you sanitise your mouth before you got around licking people's srdeholes.. May be, you may gain some intelligence On Mon, 5 Feb, 2024, 8:55 am Rajaram Krishnamurthy, wrote: So Narayanasamy you have so many anus so you are addressed as asses? On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 at 19:26, Narayanaswamy Iyer wrote: Dear folks Ever-pugnacious Madras-rowdy gangster and Red Dogtown garbage-collector Rajaram Krishnamurthy alias KARUPPAN-CHAAM, having stupidly tried to trigger a fight with Sri Gopalakrishnan, and having lost teeth, tail, nose, ears, chun and buttocks, now pleads and underlines his gargantuan idiocy:- "What we think as full is not full." An unlearned, unschooled, uneducated alleged "college-degree in Physics" holder whose brain is full of flatulence has room for more flatulence to be pumped in, whereupon it will explode. He cannot think, because as a garbage-collector has only an anus instead of a brain. Dear Sri Gopalakrishna, the despised disgraced dishonoured eunuch Rajaram Krishnamurthy is not a snake made of coconut fibre. He is a mere blood-sucking leech-louse-bedbug-flatworm without eyes, nose, ears or limbs, but with only a mouth and a cloaca spewing wastage. S Narayanaswamy Iyer S On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 3:40 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy wrote: Will this pugnacious idiot Narayanasamy change you expect Mr VVS? Never will unless he is a really 98 year old brahmana . He is not only an idiot but an illiterate imbecile. You cannot add anything to full; if it is added that means displacement can take place. And you can add anything to anything till it will not stay there but only overflow. What we think as full is not full. That is why I also added a kural peeli pei sakadumachirum appandam sala miguthu payin; only then it is full. Stupid narayanasamy On Sat, 3 Feb 2024 at 19:49, Narayanaswamy Iyer wrote: Dear folks Once born an unmitigated idiot and a blind unlearned, unschooled, uneducated, brain-diseased fool, for ever and a day Rajaram Krishnamurthy alias KARUPPAN-CHAAMI remains a fool. Despite his alleged college degree in Physics (probably fake and bought by bribes), the blind and dumb nitwit cannot read the original words in the picture:- "A GLASS FULL OF MILK". It is not, and never was "a glass nearly full" nor "a glass almost full". As for sugar, there were three egg-shaped chocolate-brown sugar balls at the foot of the picture, ready for immersion in the FULL glass. Ever-pugnacious Madras-rowdy gangster and Red Dogtown garbage-collector Rajaram Krishnamurthy alias KARUPPAN-CHAAMI tries to trigger a fight with Sri Gopalakrishnan by challenging:- "My dear Gopalakrishnan, why do you flounder so much? Probably unable to read properly? I only said displacement physics and also said if sugar space is there, some or more milk can also be added." This is both a flawed challenge and a flagrant lie. What the unemployed Red Dogtown garbage-collector actually wrote in his typical drain-gutter-sewer ungrammatical broken English was:- "We can add salt to buttermilk; pepper to tumbler or bowl full of soup; so we can add anything to brim level content; and so how will we interpret the rest as? In this quote what is forgotten is , PHYSICS IS VITAL; DISPLACEMENT WILL BE THERE; AND TO WHAT LEVEL WITHOUT SPILLING SUGAR CAN BE ADDED , SO TOO MILK CAN BE ADDED." So, according to the silly-goose idiot, you can add a heaped salad-spoonful of pepper to a BOWL FULL of soup; You can bravely and confidently at any time add a heaped salad-spoonful of salt to a MUG FULL full of buttermilk, although "displacement will be there". Significantly, he does not explicitly say, but indirectly insinuates, "To what level, despite displacement, you can add a substantial amount of pepper to a BOWL FULL of soup, or add a substantial amount of salt to a MUG FULL of buttermilk, so you can also add sugar or milk to an already full mug of milk." S Narayanaswamy Iyer On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 9:48 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy wrote: My dear Gopalakrishnan, why do you flounder so much? Probably unable to read properly? I only said displacement physics and also said if sugar space is there, some or more milk can also be added. On the contrary the quote gave your present understanding Sorry Gopala if there is any problem in the vision pl course correct it It is not my quote it is the quote of VG Thank you
Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: [iyer123] GOOD MORNING....MY VALUABLE FREINDS OF THE FORUM
So Narayanasamy you have so many anus so you are addressed as asses? On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 at 19:26, Narayanaswamy Iyer wrote: > Dear folks > > Ever-pugnacious Madras-rowdy gangster and Red Dogtown garbage-collector > Rajaram Krishnamurthy alias KARUPPAN-CHAAM, having stupidly tried to > trigger a fight with Sri Gopalakrishnan, and having lost teeth, tail, nose, > ears, chun and buttocks, now pleads and underlines his gargantuan idiocy:- > > "*What we think as full is not full.*" > > An unlearned, unschooled, uneducated alleged "college-degree in Physics" > holder whose brain is full of flatulence has room for more flatulence to be > pumped in, whereupon it will explode. > > *He cannot think, because as a garbage-collector has only an anus instead > of a brain.* > > Dear Sri Gopalakrishna, the despised disgraced dishonoured eunuch Rajaram > Krishnamurthy is not a snake made of coconut fibre. He is a mere > blood-sucking leech-louse-bedbug-flatworm without eyes, nose, ears or > limbs, but with only a mouth and a cloaca spewing wastage. > > S Narayanaswamy Iyer > > S > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 3:40 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy < > keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Will this pugnacious idiot Narayanasamy change you expect Mr VVS? Never >> will unless he is a really 98 year old brahmana . He is not only an idiot >> but an illiterate imbecile. You cannot add anything to full; if it is added >> that means displacement can take place. And you can add anything to >> anything till it will not stay there but only overflow. What we think as >> full is not full. That is why I also added a kural peeli pei sakadumachirum >> appandam sala miguthu payin; only then it is full. Stupid narayanasamy >> >> On Sat, 3 Feb 2024 at 19:49, Narayanaswamy Iyer >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Dear folks >>> >>> Once born an unmitigated idiot and a blind unlearned, unschooled, >>> uneducated, brain-diseased fool, for ever and a day Rajaram Krishnamurthy >>> alias KARUPPAN-CHAAMI remains a fool. >>> >>> Despite his alleged college degree in Physics (probably fake and bought >>> by bribes), the blind and dumb nitwit cannot read the original words in the >>> picture:- >>> >>> "*A GLASS FULL OF MILK*". >>> >>> It is not, and never was "a glass nearly full" nor "a glass almost full". >>> >>> As for sugar, there were three egg-shaped chocolate-brown sugar balls at >>> the foot of the picture, ready for immersion in the *FULL* glass. >>> >>> Ever-pugnacious Madras-rowdy gangster and Red Dogtown garbage-collector >>> Rajaram Krishnamurthy alias KARUPPAN-CHAAMI tries to trigger a fight with >>> Sri Gopalakrishnan by challenging:- >>> >>> "*My dear Gopalakrishnan, why do you flounder so much? Probably unable >>> to read properly? I only said displacement physics and also said if sugar >>> space is there, some or more milk can also be added.*" >>> >>> This is both a flawed challenge and a flagrant lie. >>> >>> What the unemployed Red Dogtown garbage-collector actually wrote in his >>> typical drain-gutter-sewer ungrammatical broken English was:- >>> >>> "*W**e can add salt to buttermilk; pepper to tumbler or bowl full of >>> soup; so we can add anything to brim level content; and so how will we >>> interpret the rest as? In this quote what is forgotten is , PHYSICS IS >>> VITAL; DISPLACEMENT WILL BE THERE; AND TO WHAT LEVEL WITHOUT SPILLING SUGAR >>> CAN BE ADDED , SO TOO MILK CAN BE ADDED*." >>> >>> So, according to the silly-goose idiot, you can add a heaped >>> salad-spoonful of pepper to a BOWL FULL of soup; You can bravely and >>> confidently at any time add a heaped salad-spoonful of salt to a MUG FULL >>> full of buttermilk, although "displacement will be there". >>> >>> *Significantly, he does not explicitly say, but indirectly insinuates, >>> "To what level, despite displacement, you can add a substantial amount of >>> pepper to a BOWL FULL of soup, or add a substantial amount of salt to a MUG >>> FULL of buttermilk, so you can also add sugar or milk to an already full >>> mug of milk.*" >>> >>> S Narayanaswamy Iyer >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 9:48 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy < >>> keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> My dear Gopalakrishnan, why do you flounder so much? Probably unable to read properly? I only said displacement physics and also said if sugar space is there, some or more milk can also be added. On the contrary the quote gave your present understanding Sorry Gopala if there is any problem in the vision pl course correct it It is not my quote it is the quote of VG Thank you for slipping once more. KR On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 23:11, gopala krishnan wrote: > Sirs, > > The quote *as Mr Rajaram wrote is NOT CORRECT*. The moment you add > sugar, there will be displacement and spill, if the milk is filled till > the > edge of the vessel. It take time to dissolve sugar. > Gopalakrishnan > > On Saturday, 3 February, 2024 at 10:05:48
Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: [iyer123] GOOD MORNING....MY VALUABLE FREINDS OF THE FORUM
Will this pugnacious idiot Narayanasamy change you expect Mr VVS? Never will unless he is a really 98 year old brahmana . He is not only an idiot but an illiterate imbecile. You cannot add anything to full; if it is added that means displacement can take place. And you can add anything to anything till it will not stay there but only overflow. What we think as full is not full. That is why I also added a kural peeli pei sakadumachirum appandam sala miguthu payin; only then it is full. Stupid narayanasamy On Sat, 3 Feb 2024 at 19:49, Narayanaswamy Iyer wrote: > > Dear folks > > Once born an unmitigated idiot and a blind unlearned, unschooled, > uneducated, brain-diseased fool, for ever and a day Rajaram Krishnamurthy > alias KARUPPAN-CHAAMI remains a fool. > > Despite his alleged college degree in Physics (probably fake and bought by > bribes), the blind and dumb nitwit cannot read the original words in the > picture:- > > "*A GLASS FULL OF MILK*". > > It is not, and never was "a glass nearly full" nor "a glass almost full". > > As for sugar, there were three egg-shaped chocolate-brown sugar balls at > the foot of the picture, ready for immersion in the *FULL* glass. > > Ever-pugnacious Madras-rowdy gangster and Red Dogtown garbage-collector > Rajaram Krishnamurthy alias KARUPPAN-CHAAMI tries to trigger a fight with > Sri Gopalakrishnan by challenging:- > > "*My dear Gopalakrishnan, why do you flounder so much? Probably unable to > read properly? I only said displacement physics and also said if sugar > space is there, some or more milk can also be added.*" > > This is both a flawed challenge and a flagrant lie. > > What the unemployed Red Dogtown garbage-collector actually wrote in his > typical drain-gutter-sewer ungrammatical broken English was:- > > "*W**e can add salt to buttermilk; pepper to tumbler or bowl full of > soup; so we can add anything to brim level content; and so how will we > interpret the rest as? In this quote what is forgotten is , PHYSICS IS > VITAL; DISPLACEMENT WILL BE THERE; AND TO WHAT LEVEL WITHOUT SPILLING SUGAR > CAN BE ADDED , SO TOO MILK CAN BE ADDED*." > > So, according to the silly-goose idiot, you can add a heaped > salad-spoonful of pepper to a BOWL FULL of soup; You can bravely and > confidently at any time add a heaped salad-spoonful of salt to a MUG FULL > full of buttermilk, although "displacement will be there". > > *Significantly, he does not explicitly say, but indirectly insinuates, "To > what level, despite displacement, you can add a substantial amount of > pepper to a BOWL FULL of soup, or add a substantial amount of salt to a MUG > FULL of buttermilk, so you can also add sugar or milk to an already full > mug of milk.*" > > S Narayanaswamy Iyer > > > > > On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 9:48 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy < > keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> My dear Gopalakrishnan, why do you flounder so much? Probably unable to >> read properly? I only said displacement physics and also said if sugar >> space is there, some or more milk can also be added. On the contrary the >> quote gave your present understanding Sorry Gopala if there is any problem >> in the vision pl course correct it It is not my quote it is the quote of >> VG Thank you for slipping once more. KR >> >> On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 23:11, gopala krishnan wrote: >> >>> Sirs, >>> >>> The quote *as Mr Rajaram wrote is NOT CORRECT*. The moment you add >>> sugar, there will be displacement and spill, if the milk is filled till the >>> edge of the vessel. It take time to dissolve sugar. >>> Gopalakrishnan >>> >>> On Saturday, 3 February, 2024 at 10:05:48 am IST, Markendeya Yeddanapudi >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Sridharan Sir, >>> You always add values only. >>> YM >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 9:28 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy < >>> keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> It is a convenient presentation; we can add salt to buttermilk; pepper >>> to tumbler or bowl full of soup; so we can add anything to brim >>> level content; and so how will we interpret the rest as? In this quote what >>> is forgotten is , PHYSICS IS VITAL; DISPLACEMENT WILL BE THERE; AND TO WHAT >>> LEVEL WITHOUT SPILLING SUGAR CAN BE ADDED , SO TOO MILK CAN BE ADDED; AND >>> where the brim level is reached, even if you pour sugar, milk will spill >>> only. It's not an akshaya patram. Achirum appandam sala miguthup payin. >>> Hence simile could have been thought over. And milk need not be drunk only >>> with sugar; even without sugar we can. KR IRS 2224//3224 >>> >>> On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 21:34, 'venkat giri' via iyer123 < >>> iyer...@googlegroups.com> wrote: >>> >>> *Respected Sir/s,* >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> [image: Inline image] >>> Regards >>> V.Sridharan >>> Trichy >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "iyer123" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to iyer123+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> To view this discussion on the web
