A word of caution

2003-02-20 Thread Astro




From another email list

Warning 
foranyone using LimeWire or Morpheus 
For many years now I've used a free 
download service called LimeWire. You can usually find songs, programs and 
other information others care to share.Lately, there have been a number 
of programs that turn up when you search for what you want that are viruses 
that plant invisable report programs on your computer. This virus doesn't do 
any damage but rather monitors keystrokes and URL visits and reports these 
back to another computer. This system has thought of everything you could 
possibly search for and has renamed this same file under hundreds of 
thousands of different names. It's the exact same file and comes from the 
exact same IP: 38.144.198.150. If any of your more advanced 
users care to back trace the IP, they will find it's the central computer 
for the Federal Bureau of Investigation located in the Justice Department 
building on Capitol Hill Blvd.I would warn anyone who uses LimeWire or 
Morpheus to beware of what you're downloading. If you ask for, say, Sunny 
Day.mp3 and you see a file listed that says something like 
this:Sunny Day (Awesome!) mp3 (Size) 302 kbOrSunny Day (The Real 
Thing!) mp3 (Size) 302 kbBe careful!!! First of all, any song will be at 
least 1,500 kb unless it's only a fragment. Second of all, why would someone 
put "AWESOME!!" or "The Real Thing!" unless they were trying to scam you in 
the first place?Every single one of those files in questions traces back 
to IP 38.144.198.150.I downloaded the file but 
didn't run it and sent it to a computer whiz friend who analyzed it by line 
code. It's designed to record keystrokes (whatever you type on your keyboard 
is kept in a file you don't know about on your hard drive and downloaded on 
command), record which websites you visit, copy your email and place a pass 
through any firewall so that the recorded information can be transmitted 
back to the main FBI computer.Beware, Big Brother is in 
place.Yours,Stephanie 


Top 10 Countries from which the United States Imports Oil

2003-02-21 Thread Astro



To clear up any 
misconceptions2002 Top 10 Countries from which the United States 
Imports Oil (thousand barrels per day)Ranking Country 2000, 2001, 
2002*
1 Canada 1,807 1,828 
1,895 2 
Saudi Arabia 
1,572 1,662 1,505 3 Mexico 1,373 1,440 
1,501 4 
Venezuela 
1,546 1,553 1,385 5 Nigeria 
896 885 600 6 Iraq 620 795 525 7 United Kingdom 366 324 
461 8 Norway 343 341 407 9 Angola 301 328 
325 10 Algeria 225 278 282 

Total Top Ten Imports 9,049 9,434 8,886 

Total Imports 11,549 11,871 11,299 

Top Ten Share of Imports 78% 79% 79% * 
8-month average Source: Energy Information Administration, 
Monthly Energy Review, October 2002, Table 3.3.. 



Can anyone answer this?

2003-02-27 Thread Astro



This is a from a letter printed in our local paper. I have 
never heard this question before. Do any of you know if his statements have 
merit? Or is there a 'clause' which would letBush off the hook? 
Thanks for all your help! :)



Let's assume for the sake of argument that the United States and President 
Bush do not receive the required number of U.N. Security Council votes for going 
to war, yet decide to go to war without the full backing of the United 
Nations.
The charters of both NATO and the United Nations require its members to 
defend any sovereign member nation against an unprovoked preemptive attack by 
all means possible, both diplomatically and militarily.
Would that mean the United Nations would have to come to the defense of 
Iraq in the event of an attack by the United States and other members joining 
the coalition? It's something to think about.
It could mean the end of the United Nations as an effective means of 
maintaining peace and stability throughout the 
world.


Sorry for the delay in responding to your email.

2003-03-01 Thread Astro



Sorry for the delay in responding to your 
email. 

It took me much more time than I thought it 
would to wrap my house in duct tape and plastic sheeting to ward off a 
biological attack. It wasn't easy, but I think I've finally got the place 
air tight for now.At first, I was just going to create one safe 
roomlike the experts on TV were advising everyone to do. But I'm a 
little claustrophobic, so I decided to just seal the entire inside ofmy 
house. Andthen as an extra added precaution,I decided to seal 
the entire outside of my house as well.The neighbors gave me some 
strange looks until I told them I'm tenting for termites. I think they may 
be getting a little bit suspicious though. 
I convertedmyliving room into a 
decontamination chamber, so getting in and out is a little bit of a hassle, but 
it could be a whole lot worse. Be that as it may, I sure do feel a whole 
lot safer now. I just hope the attack, when it comes, doesn't 
lasttoo long because I've noticeda lackof oxygen in 
here.But let's not dwell on that. The important thing is I'm now 
fully prepared for the terrorist attacks our Homeland Security folks 
assure usare coming any day now. Personally, Ihave absolutely 
no doubt whatsoever they are coming. 

Well I see we've been officially elevated to a 
an Orange Alert again! That makes all of my extra work seem even more 
worth while and now I'm really glad I have my house sealed up tight. Quite 
frankly, these terrorists seem a little desperate to me. But let's not dwell on 
that. 

That's why I loaded up an extracart at 
Home Depot with duct tape and rolls of plastic sheeting. I had to pay a 
littlemore for the clear plastic but it's worth every extra penny spent 
because it letslight inside the house. Luckily, I'm usually dressed 
like a constructon worker when I go to Home Depot soI didn't raise too 
many eyebrows. The clerks probably just thought I was protectinga 
constructionjob from rain or something, and notone of 
thosewackos preparing for a biological attack. 

But let's not dwell on that. 

Warren
 



Big fish was dead already - Asia Times report

2003-03-03 Thread Astro




Whoare yougoing 
tobelieve?

Big fish was dead already - Asia Times reporthttp://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/DJ30Df01.htmlArticle dated October 30 2002By Syed Saleem Shahzad 
"KARACHI - Ever since the frenzied shootout last month on September 11 
in Karachi there have been doubts over whether Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the 
self-proclaimed head of al-Qaeda's military committee, died in the police raid 
on his apartment. snipNow it has emerged that Kuwaiti 
national Khalid Shaikh Mohammed did indeed perish in the raid, but his wife and 
child were taken from the apartment and handed over to the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation (FBI), in whose hands they remain. "Asia Times is Hong 
Kong based and not prone to Fox style fact checking. This could be a very 
serious set-back even by Ari's mendaciously low standards. A dead man is 
supposed to have been arrested this weekend. Was he dug up for this purpose or 
what?See if you can get these people to realise they may be sitting on a 
great story. I have already (politely) asked for them to confirm if they screwed 
up or if (shock) the Bush administrationis lying yet again. [EMAIL PROTECTED]


More on this BIG, BIG LIE from this 
LYING, CROOKED ADMIN!

News Update from Citizens for Legitimate 
Government March 2, 2003 http://www.legitgov.org/index.html#breaking_newsUS Lying About Shaikh Mohammed's Capture: He Died in 2002 
(Oct. 30, 2002, Asia Times) Now it has emerged that Kuwaiti national Khalid 
Shaikh Mohammed did indeed perish in the raid, but his wife and child were taken 
from the apartment and handed over to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), 
in whose hands they remain. Major Catch, Critical Time (The New York Times, Mar. 
2, 2003) Of all the milestones in the Bush dictatorship's 18-month 
campaign against terrorism, the apprehension of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, possibly 
the most fearsome of Osama bin Laden's chief lieutenants, came at a critical 
juncture. Dictator Bush's critics have been complaining that his focus on 
President Saddam Hussein had distracted the nation from the war against Al 
Qaeda.



We May Never know For 
Sure

Pakistani police captured eight suspects alive 
and killed two in three raids on homes in a middle-class suburb of Karachi that 
triggered a four-hour battle with rifles, grenades and tear-gas. Pakistani 
police officers at the scene initially insisted that one of the dead men was an 
Arab, naming him as Khalid bin Mohammed.Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, who was 
born in Kuwait, is known to have been in Karachi this year. He was interviewed 
there in June by al-Jazeera, the Arabic television network, in the company of 
Binalshibh.On Saturday, US officials told the Washington Post newspaper 
that they did not believe that the dead man was Mohammed.On Sunday, 
Condoleeza Rice, the US national security adviser, told ABC News: "I wouldn't 
rule anything out here, but I think that we'll just wait and see how this 
unfolds.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2002/09/16/wpak116.xml

A chilling inheritance of terrorBy Syed Saleem Shahzad 
KARACHI - Ever since the frenzied shootout last month on September 11 in 
Karachi there have been doubts over whether Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the 
self-proclaimed head of al-Qaeda's military committee, died in the police raid 
on his apartment. Certainly, another senior al-Qaeda figure, Ramzi 
Binalshibh, widely attributed as being the coordinator of the September 11 
attacks on the United States a year earlier, was taken alive and handed over to 
the US. The latest information is that he is on a US warship somewhere in the 
Gulf. Now it has emerged that Kuwaiti national Khalid Shaikh Mohammed 
did indeed perish in the raid, but his wife and child were taken from the 
apartment and handed over to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), in whose 
hands they remain. More:http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/DJ30Df01.html 
Further circumstantial evidence from the 
CIA-fed Voice of America, now blowing smoke by claiming that 'conflicting 
sources' make it unclear whether the US even has him in custody or 
not.http://www.voanews.com/article.cfm?objectID=A84AED3F-87D0-4D3B-A52304825ED216C1 (11 hours ago, via Google News)



Further circumstantial evidence from the 
CIA-fed Voice of America, now blowing smoke by claiming that 'conflicting 
sources' make it unclear whether the US even has him in custody or 
not.http://www.voanews.com/article.cfm?objectID=A84AED3F-87D0-4D3B-A52304825ED216C1 (11 hours ago, via Google News)

Yeah Riiight. Uh 
huh.

There are conflicting reports Sunday over who 
has custody of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the suspected mastermind of the September 
11 terrorist attacks who was arrested in Pakistan Saturday. Some 
Pakistani officials say he was turned over to U.S. officials and taken outside 
the country for questioning. But Pakistan's interior minister says 
Pakistani officials continue to hold him inside Pakistan. He says officials have 
no intention 

War by Howard Zinn

2003-03-03 Thread Astro





  
  

  Published on Thursday, February 27, 2003 by CommonDreams.org 
  

  War 
  
  

  by Howard Zinn
  

  

  As I write this, it looks like war. 
  This, in spite of the obvious lack of enthusiasm in the country for 
  war. The polls that register "approve" or "disapprove" can only count 
  numbers, they cannot test the depth of feeling. And there are many signs 
  that the support for war is shallow and shaky and ambivalent.. That's why 
  the numbers showing approval for war have been steadily going down. 
  This administration will not likely be stopped, though it knows its 
  support is thin., In fact, that is undoubtedly why it is in such a hurry; 
  it wants to go to war before the support declines even further. 
  The assumption is that once the soldiers are in combat, the American 
  people will unite behind the war. The television screens will be dominated 
  by images showing "smart bombs" exploding, and the Secretary of Defense 
  will assure the American people that civilian casualties are being kept to 
  a minimum. (We're in the age of megadeaths, and any number of casualties 
  less than a million is no cause for concern). 
  This is the way it has been. Unity behind the president in time of war. 
  But it may not be that way again. 
  The anti-war movement will not likely surrender to the martial 
  atmosphere. The hundreds of thousands who marched in Washington and San 
  Francisco and New York and Boston - and in villages, towns, cities all 
  over the country from Georgia to Montana - will not meekly withdraw. 
  Unlike the shallow support for the war, the opposition to the war is deep, 
  cannot be easily dislodged or frightened into silence. 
  Indeed, the anti-war feelings are bound to become more intense. To the 
  demand "Support Our GIs", the movement will be able to reply: "Yes, we 
  support our GIs, we want them to live, we want them to be brought home. 
  The government is not supporting them. It is sending them to die, or to be 
  wounded, or to be poisoned by our own depleted uranium shells". 
  No, our casualties will not be numerous, but every single one will be a 
  waste of an important human life. We will insist that this government be 
  held responsible for every death, every dismemberment, every case of 
  sickness, every case of psychic trauma caused by the shock of war. 
  And though the media will be blocked from access to the dead and 
  wounded of Iraq, though the human tragedy unfolding in Iraq will be told 
  in numbers, in abstractions, and not in the stories of real human beings, 
  real children, real mothers and fathers - the movement will find a way to 
  tell that story. And when it does, the American people, who can be cold to 
  death on "the other side", but who also wake up when "the other side" is 
  suddenly seen as a man, a woman, a child - just like us - will respond. 
  This is not a fantasy, not a vain hope. It happened in the Vietnam 
  years. For a long time, what was being done to the peasants of Vietnam was 
  concealed by statistics, the "body count", without bodies being shown, 
  without faces being shown, without pain, fear, anguish shown. But then the 
  stories began to come through - the story of the My Lai massacre, the 
  stories told by returning GIs of atrocities they had participated in. 
  And the pictures appeared - the little girl struck by napalm running 
  down the road, her skin shredding, the mothers holding their babies to 
  them in the trenches as GIs poured rounds of bullets from automatic rifles 
  into their bodies. 
  When those stories began to come out, when the photos were seen, the 
  American people could not fail to be moved. The war "against Communism" 
  was seen as a war against poor peasants in a tiny country half the world 
  away. 
  At some point in this coming war, and no one can say when, the lies 
  coming from the administration - "the death of this family was an 
  accident", "we apologize for the dismemberment of this child", "this was 
  an intelligence mistake", "a radar misfunction" - will begin to come 
  apart. 
  How soon that will happen depends not only on the millions now - 
  whether actively or silently -- in the anti-war movement, but also on the 
  emergence of whistle blowers inside the Establishment who begin to talk, , 
  of journalists who become tired of being manipulated by the government, 
  and begin to write to truth. . And of dissident soldiers sick of a war 
  that is not a war but a massacre --how else describe the mayhem caused by 
  the most powerful military machine on earth raining thousands of bombs on 
  a fifth-rate military power already reduced to poverty 

Monitoring Iraq Airwaves - Shortwave?

2003-03-03 Thread Astro



Monitoring Iraq Airwaves
Guide to monitoring radio transmissions to 
and from Iraq. Shortwave and mediumwave radio offer a unique chance to get 
alternative, first hand accounts and opinions on the crisis - at least if you 
speak Arabic or Kurdish. Here you can find a listing of radio stations involved 
in the crisis, complete with frequencies and audio samples.
http://www.dxing.info/articles/iraq.dx#top 
bookmark for future reference
"Black" Radio 
Exposed
Recently, shortwave radio enthusiasts picked up a 
new and extremely strong radio signal being broadcast in Iraq. Dubbed "Radio 
Tikrit," the station which broadcasts on 1584 kHz has been exposed by radio 
specialists and confirmed by such eminent venues as The Wall Street 
Journal and the Guardian (UK)--and by the stony silence of the 
CIA--as a "black operation."
http://www.sianews.com/modules.php?name=Newsfile=articlesid=726


Moscow Times editorial

2003-03-03 Thread Astro




This was 
printed in the Monday online edition of the Moscow Times 

Monday, Mar. 3, 2003. Page 11 
Clamping Down 
StatesideBy Matt Bivens 

  
  

  
  WASHINGTON -- On the evening of Feb. 13, Andrew 
  O'Conner, 40, was at St. John's College library in New Mexico when city 
  police arrested him at his computer terminal, cuffed him and took him to 
  the state capital, Santa Fe, for questioning by federal Secret Service 
  agents. According to the American Library Association, O'Conner said they 
  accused him of having made threatening remarks about President George W. 
  Bush in an Internet chat room. O'Conner said he recalled saying Bush is 
  "out of control," and added, "I'm going to sue the Secret Service, Santa 
  Fe Police, St. John's and everybody involved in this whole thing." 
  
  
  That same evening 
  on the opposite coast, New York police arrested two young people, Lytle 
  Shaw and Emilie Clark, for taping up photos of everyday life in Baghdad. 
  Shaw and Lytle say they were told putting up posters was a "quality of 
  life" infraction, i.e. a minor one. They both had identification on them 
  -- driver's licenses -- and Emilie was seven months' pregnant, so they 
  asked if they could just be written tickets. Police instead cuffed them, 
  took them to jail and hassled them all night about how they ought to avoid 
  a planned anti-war protest. 
  
  In Chicago a week 
  later, immigration officials detained Bernadette Devlin McAliskey, 55, a 
  well-known Irish political activist who has been coming to the States for 
  more than 30 years. 
  
  McAliskey had 
  previously been handed the "key to the city" -- an honor that symbolizes 
  one is always welcome -- of New York and San Francisco. At age 21, she was 
  the youngest person ever elected to the British Parliament. But on Feb. 
  21, immigration police said they had paperwork warning she was a "national 
  security" danger; they deported her. "Somebody in Washington, with the 
  mind of a rodent, has to order that," complained Newsday columnist Jimmy 
  Breslin. "This has to be all about her making a speech against the war 
  someplace and the British put in a complaint to our 
  authorities."
  
  A man complaining 
  about the president in a chat room. Two young people taping up anti-war 
  posters. A famous Irish moral authority. All of them targeted by teams of 
  government and/or police agents. 
  
  It's tempting to 
  dismiss these incidents as contemptible, but isolated. Yet the pattern 
  grows ever-harder to ignore. Three days after McAliskey's deportation, 
  cable news channel MSNBC fired its top-rated anchor, Phil Donahue. 
  (Russians will remember the American-Soviet talk-show bridge Donahue built 
  with journalist Vladimir Pozner.) 
  
  Donahue, it seems, 
  is "a tired, left-wing liberal out of touch with the current marketplace 
  ... a difficult public face for [parent network] NBC in a time of war. ... 
  He seems to delight in presenting guests who are antiwar, anti-Bush and 
  skeptical of the administration's motives." 
  
  So says an 
  internal NBC report obtained by a television industry journal, 
  Allyourtv.com. The report warns Donahue's show could become, gasp, "a home 
  for the liberal antiwar agenda at the same time that our competitors are 
  waving the flag at every opportunity."
  
  They certainly 
  are. Antiwar groups complain they can't get national networks to accept 
  ads questioning the drive to invade Iraq. And CNN confirmed as much to The 
  Washington Post: CNN spokeswoman Megan Mahoney is quoted saying the news 
  channel's policy is that "we do not accept international advocacy ads on 
  regions in conflict." (What?) An NBC spokeswoman tells The Post the 
  network refused an antiwar ad because "It pertained to a controversial 
  issue which we prefer to handle in our news and public affairs 
  programming." (What?) Fox, hands-down the most pro-war and partisan of all 
  the major networks, apparently shrugged and smirked -- it declined to even 
  comment.
  
  Over at the UN, 
  they've hung a blue curtain to hide Pablo Picasso's antiwar masterpiece 
  "Guernica," which depicts the horrors of carpet-bombing. Meanwhile, the 
  worst case of pro-government censorship my generation has seen -- a 
  refusal by the Washington area's main cable company, Comcast, to run some 
  innocuous antiwar ads on CNN and other channels the night of the 
  president's State of the Union speech -- has been met with a big fat yawn. 
  
  
  Check out the ads 
  yourself at awvf.org, you'll see a series of Americans voicing concerns 
  that aren't 

Charley Reese - The Don't Know Crowd

2003-03-04 Thread Astro



Received froma conservative 
friend in Brevard County, Florida 



Charley Reese is a well-known 
conservative writer in central Florida, formerly a regularly appearing columnist 
for the Orlando Sentinel newspaper. He is another conservative AGAINST the Bush 
administration war plans.http://reese.king-online.com/Reese_20030224/index.phpThe "Don't Know" CrowdThe Bush 
administration adamantly insists that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, 
but despite 12 years of inspections, bombings and spying, it doesn't have a 
clue as to where they are.It frequently warns us of terror attacks, but 
always says it doesn't know where, when or how. Nor have there been any 
terror attacks in the United States in the past 18 months.Is it any 
wonder that millions of people around the world and in the United States 
don't support President George Bush's personal crusade to topple Saddam 
Hussein? Keep in mind that after the Sept. 11 attack, which Saddam Hussein 
had nothing to do with, virtually the entire world united in sympathy with 
us. Never has one president destroyed so much support by so many people in 
so short a time.The fact is, the people in the Bush administration who 
want to go to war with Iraq wanted to go to war with Iraq before Sept. 11. 
As a matter of fact, they wanted to go to war with Iraq before George Bush 
was even elected president. That's a matter of record. This war against Iraq 
has nothing to do with disarming Iraq and nothing to do with terrorism. It 
has to do with the United States creating a situation in which it and Israel 
will dominate the Middle East and its oil resources.The thing to 
remember about these alleged weapons of mass destruction is that nobody in 
the Bush administration or with the United Nations has ever laid eyes on 
them. What exists is a discrepancy between two numbers in reports - both 
supplied by the Iraqi government. One report stated that so many chemical 
bombs were used; another report had a different number. And the Iraqis are 
certainly right in that nobody can prove a negative; you can't produce for 
inspection what you don't have.I personally don't know if these weapons 
exist in Iraq or not. I do know they exist in many other countries. I do 
know that in the Gulf War, Iraq did not use any chemical or biological 
weapons, even when it was being routed from Kuwait and "bombed back into the 
preindustrial age," to use an American phrase. I do know that in the 12 
years since, Iraq has not used any chemical or biological weapons, even 
though it has been subjected to the harshest economic sanctions in modern 
history and to practically regular bombing. I do know that in the past 12 
years, Iraq has not threatened, much less attacked, any of its neighbors, 
while during that the same period of time we have attacked Sudan, Somalia, 
Afghanistan, Iraq and Yugoslavia. I do know that every one of the 
"neighbors" George Bush claims Iraq is a threat to has said repeatedly that 
it does not feel threatened by Iraq.I do know that the only leader 
threatening the world with nuclear weapons and pre-emptive attack is George 
W. Bush. It gives me no pleasure to point that out. But it is not the role 
of an American citizen to be a sheep. It has become apparent that those of 
us who supported Bush made a mistake. I'm beginning to believe that a 
philanderer and a liar is less dangerous than an upright but ignorant man 
who thinks God has appointed him to rule the world.The best way to 
support our troops is to try to prevent the Bush administration from 
sacrificing their lives for the hidden agenda of the crazy neoconservatives 
in his administration. Young Americans should not die because a bunch of 
chicken hawks have a cockamamie idea that they can bring liberal democracy 
to the Middle East by making war. That's like trying to sell pork barbecue 
in Mecca. What the president is intent on doing is committing a crime 
against humanity. If he goes through with it, he'll have to change his 
ritualistic "God bless America" to "God forgive us."The Facts About 
RebellionWhich political leader made war on his own people, killing 
262,000 of them, burning their cities, destroying their food supply and 
placing the survivors under military occupation?If your answer is 
Saddam Hussein, you're wrong. The answer is Abraham Lincoln.Accepting 
the Northern but incorrect view of the War Between the States, Lincoln did 
exactly the same thing Saddam Hussein did. When "his own people" rose up in 
armed rebellion, he crushed the rebellion, brutally and 
decisively.I'm making this point not to disillusion you about 
Lincoln but to point out how propaganda works. One effective way to 
propagandize people is to take a fact out of context. Much has been made of 
the fact that Saddam Hussein crushed the Kurdish rebellion. Any leader of 
Iraq would have crushed the Kurdish rebellion. If the Scots rose up in armed 
rebellion today, British Prime Minister Tony Blair would crush, or try 

Dismantle Weapons of Mass Deception

2003-03-04 Thread Astro



How about doing this nation wide? Don't 
get mad, get even! :)


March 2, 2003Fed-Up Viewers Say, “No More 
Lies!”People Smash Their TVs at NBC 
StudiosWASHINGTON, DC - Early Sunday morning, a group of 
disgruntled television viewers calling themselves “Meet The People” disowned 
their television sets in front of NBC studios to protest the pro-war media bias 
prevalent in Sunday morning talk shows. They then proceeded to smash the sets, 
under a banner that screamed, “Dismantle Weapons of Mass 
Deception.”


Click here to view 
photos:
http://dc.indymedia.org/local/webcast/uploads/metafiles/nbc_aftermath.jpg
http://images.indymedia.org/imc/washingtondc/nbc_aftermath2.jpg
http://dc.indymedia.org/local/webcast/uploads/metafiles/nbc_aftermath3.jpg
One television smasher, Noah Hypocrisy, 
told reporters that he was fed-up with the invasion of the 
military-industrial-media complex in his life, especially in light of the 
impending war on Iraq: “In the United States and other Western powers, the 
corporate-owned media depend on the military for information, accepting what 
military officers at the Pentagon or the White House spinners offer as 
undeniable fact.” “I’m not that gullible, and I’m mad as hell at what 
I’m seeing on my television set!” Hypocrisy said, in between hammer strokes with 
what seemed to be a Titleist golf pitching wedge.Another disenchanted 
viewer, Louisville Slugger in hand, lamented the heavy political biases she 
observes in the mainstream media: “In 2001, NBC Nightly News, ABC World News 
Tonight, and CBS Evening News interviewed U.S. sources who were 92% white, 85% 
male, and 75% Republican,” cried Ceci Truth. “How objective is 
that?!!!”Timed for the taping of NBC’s Sunday morning talk show “Meet 
the Press,” Meet the People barricaded the Nebraska Avenue entrance to the 
studios with a motley collection of their former television sets. Video of the 
dismantling will be available today at www.dc.indymedia.org .The People 
were determined that this was only the start.“We won’t stop here, and we 
encourage other thinking people to do similar actions. If the war on Iraq 
begins, we aren’t going to sit stupidly in our living rooms and accept the lies 
the corporate media try to feed us.” “We plan to seek out other weapons 
of mass deception: newspaper, radio, and other television studios. As their 
propaganda tries to drown out the truth, our level of disgust and resistance 
will escalate!” 

BEWARE THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL-MEDIA 
COMPLEX...http://dc.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=53342group=webcast


I'm The 
Slime 
I am gross and 
perverted I'm obsessed 'n deranged I have existed for years But very 
little has changed I am the tool of the Government And industry too 
For I am destined to rule And regulate you I may be vile and 
pernicious But you can't look away I make you think I'm delicious 
With the stuff that I say I am the best you can get Have you guessed 
me yet? I am the slime oozin' out From your TV set 
You will obey me 
while I lead you And eat the garbage that I feed you Until the day that 
we don't need you Don't go for help...no one will heed you Your mind is 
totally controlled It has been stuffed into my mold And you will do as 
you are told Until the rights to you are sold 
That's right, 
folks.. Don't touch that dial 
Well, I am the slime 
from your video Oozin' along on your livingroom floor I am the slime 
from your video Can't stop the slime, people, lookit me 
go 
Frank Zappa, 1973, "Overnite 
Sensation" 
The 
Revolution Will Not Be Televised





The REAL story on Khalid Shaikh Mohammed

2003-03-05 Thread Astro




This is one of the best pieces of true 
investigativejournalism I've read in an extremelylong time. 
Expertly researched andextensively documented byPaul Thompson. 
I highly recommend you peruse this article with great care. 


Is there 
more to the capture of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed than meets the eye? 
http://www.complete911timeline.org/main/essayksmcapture.html 




Read it and weep, then please forward

2003-03-06 Thread Astro
Title: Read it and weep, then please forward



Gentle readers be forewarned: a 
(homeless?) Vietnam veteran standing in fromt of the Vietnam memorial in 
Washingtom DC speaks from his heart in very blunt terms. I cannot 
personally find fault with his language or sentiments as he speaks of the awful 
truthabout his experiences in Vietnam. I'm in complete agreement with his 
view points.


- Original Message - 
From: William O. Jenkins 

To: Wojay 
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:20 AM
Subject: Read it and weep, then please forward
The Wall 
by Alfred A. Hambidge, Jr.  The snow was coming 
down pretty heavy as I walked towards the National Mall. I've always liked 
walking during a snowstorm; everything seems so quiet, every noise is muffled, 
even here in D.C. And this storm was a doozy, hammering much of the East 
Coast. I don't know why, but I started heading for the Vietnam Veterans 
Memorial. There weren't many people there; few visit during weather like 
this. As I walked by the panels, relishing the stillness, I came upon a 
man in fatigues. Though one of those floppy green hats covered his head, 
he seemed under dressed considering the cold. The area around him was 
devoid of wind and snow, as if the Wall created a sheltered harbor from the 
storm. He was staring at one panel, at a spot about chest high. Upon 
my approach, he said to no one in particular, "Goddamn bastards are doing it 
again." The sound of his voice startled me; I flinched, and stopped. 
He turned to look at me. "We never learn, do we?" he asked. My 
quizzical look made him chuckle, and he continued as he turned back toward the 
Wall: "It never ceases to amaze me what we let ourselves be turned into 
cannon fodder for. We let ourselves get talked into all sorts of horror, 
and only after the body bags start piling up do we begin to wonder why." 
We both knew he had my attention now. "Know how many names are 
here?" he asked. "Something like 50,000," I replied. "You make it 
sound like a goddamn statistic" he said, "There's Fifty Eight Thousand Two 
Hundred And Twenty Nine names on this Wall." He said the words slowly, 
enunciating each one. "Fifty Eight Thousand Two Hundred And Twenty 
Nine. Every one of them a son; a brother, or a father, a husband, a 
cousin, a lover, a neighbor, a friend. Fifty Eight Thousand Two Hundred 
And Twenty Nine boys brought home in boxes. For what? For fuckin' 
nothing. And now the bastards are gonna do it again." "You mean 
Iraq ?" I asked. "That isn't gonna be for nothing. Saddam is dangerous, he 
has to be stopped." The man could barely conceal his contempt. 
"Give me a break. A danger to who? Us here in the U.S. of A.? 
Is his navy off our coast? Is his air force flying over our cities? 
The only danger he poses is to his neighbors, maybe, and they're so worried 
about it that they're willing to let us die for them, but won't fight him 
themselves. And they want us to pay them for the privilege. With 
friends like that . . . ." His voice trailed off. "Maybe you're right," he 
finally said, "this isn't for nothing. It's for oil." My raised 
eyebrows made him shake his head, and he went on: "I don't know what's 
worse. Killing people over political philosophy, like in my time, or for 
oil. Hey, at least this time we might get something for our blood. 
Like ol' Tecumseh Sherman said, 'Nations go to war when there is something to be 
got by it'. Now oil can be got by it. After a great start, we're 
gonna be no different than any other empire that came down the historical pike. 
"And I know what you're gonna say next. 'He sponsors 
terrorism'. Where's the proof? I thought we were going after 
bin Laden for that. But wait, Afghanistan ain't got any oil. So we 
need another monster, who's got something worth taking. And Saddam is so 
damn convenient. Yeah, he's an evil sonovabitch who deserves to be taken 
out, but are we the ones who should do it? Are our kids the ones who 
should die for it? Is he worth another Wall like this? "And what 
the hell is terrorism, anyway? It's not a thing; it's not a place; it's 
not a person. It is a political and military strategy, that's all. 
Having a 'War On Terrorism' is as ridiculous as having a 'War on Flanking 
Maneuvers'. You'll end terrorism when there's no longer anything for 
anybody to get pissed off about. As for now, maybe if we looked at why 
people are pissed at us, we'd begin to understand. Hell, it doesn't matter 
whether they're right or wrong; it's what they perceive that motivates 
them. What you have to address is why they perceive things as they 
do. Only then will you start to get a clue. And spare me the 
bullshit about them hating us because of our freedom. We haven't been 
truly free in a long time. And now we're letting all this demagoguery 
convince us to give up what little liberty we have left. Big Brother 
Lives! "Look at history, man. The Romans began with a republic, 
just like we did. The freedom and prosperity that followed 

Re: Fla. officials warn of bacteria outbreak

2003-03-07 Thread Astro



I used to live on the beach in South Florida and these 
advisories are nothing new. This happens frequentlybecause theypump 
raw sewage through underwater pipelines out into the ocean. Most 
ofthe pipelines extend a couple of miles out from the shoreline and 
thesewageis carried away by theGulf Stream currents and 
effectively dispersed.Many of these sewage pipes are very old and prone 
toleakage. When Ilived in Miami, a large underwater pipeline broke 
wide open and was pouring tons of raw sewage into the bayuntil it was shut 
down and repaired.What a mess!They've had quite a few other 
similar incidents over the years.The tides and currentsnormally take 
care of these pollution problems, but some times they 
"misbehave."

Most visitors don't even realize raw sewageis being 
pumpedinto the Ocean, they never see any of the pipelines and the Chamber 
of Commerce and Department of Tourism certainly isn't going to tell them about 
it.The average visitor looks at the crystal clear water and assumes it's 
safe to swim in.Most of the time it is, but not always.

These water advisory reports are bad for tourism so they try 
and keep a lid on most of them. This article doesn't say 
anything about it, but it sounds to me like they have another pipeline that's in 
need of repair. Again.


The Willing Conscript by Tom Paxton

2003-03-09 Thread Astro



The Willing Conscript
Oh Sergeant I'm a 
draftee and I've just arrived in camp.I've come to wear the uniform and join 
the martial tramp.And I want to do my duty, but one thing I do 
imploreYou must give me lessons, sergeant, for I've never killed 
before.To do my job obediently is my only desire.To learn my weapon 
thoroughly and how to aim and fire.To learn to kill the enemy and then to 
slaughter more,I'll need instruction, sergeant, for I've never killed 
before.Now there are several lessons that I haven't mastered yet.I 
haven't got the hang of how to use the bayonet.If he doesn't die at once am 
I to stick him with it more?Oh, I hope you will be patient, for I've never 
killed before.Oh, there are rumors in the camp about our enemy.They 
say that when you see him he looks just like you and me.But you deny it, 
Sergeant, and you are a man of war,So you must give me lessons, for I've 
never killed before.The hand grenade is something that I just don't 
understand.You've got to throw it quickly or you're apt to lose your 
hand.Does it blow a man to pieces with it's wicked, muffled roar?Oh, 
I've got so much to learn because I've never killed before.Oh, I want to 
thank you, Sergeant, for the help you've been to me.For you've taught me how 
to slaughter and to hate the enemy.And I know that I'll be ready when they 
march me off to war,And I know that it won't matter that I've never killed 
before.And I know that it won't matter that I've never killed 
before.

Words and Music by Tom 
Paxton



If musicians were only politicians, and politicians were 
musicians, 
we'd have a wonderful world with very bad 
music.


patriotic bkgd.jpg

Take America Back

2003-03-10 Thread Astro




Click here: TAKE AMERICA BACK
patriotic bkgd.jpg

Waltzing Matilda

2003-03-10 Thread Astro



Waltzing 
Matilda

When I was 
a young man I carried my packAnd I lived the free life of a roverFrom 
the Murrays green basin to the dusty outbackI waltzed my Matilda all 
overThen in nineteen fifteen my country said SonIt's time to stop 
rambling 'cause there's work to be doneSo they gave me a tin hat and they 
gave me a gunAnd they sent me away to the warAnd the band played 
Waltzing MatildaAs we sailed away from the quayAnd amidst all the tears 
and the shouts and the cheersWe sailed off to GallipoliHow well I 
remember that terrible dayWhen the blood stained the sand and the 
waterAnd how in that hell that they called Suvla BayWe were butchered 
like lambs at the slaughterJohnny Turk he was ready, he primed himself 
wellHe showered us with bullets, he rained us with shells And in five 
minutes flat he'd blown us all to hellNearly blew us right back to 
AustraliaBut the band played Waltzing MatildaAs we stopped to bury 
our slainAnd we buried ours and the Turks buried theirsThen it started 
all over againNow those who were living did their best to surviveIn 
that mad world of blood, death and fireAnd for seven long weeks I kept 
myself aliveWhile the corpses around me piled higherThen a big Turkish 
shell knocked me arse over titAnd when I woke up in my hospital bedAnd 
saw what it had done, Christ I wished I was dead Never knew there were worse 
things than dyingAnd no more I'll go waltzing MatildaTo the green 
bushes so far and nearFor to hump tent and pegs, a man needs two legsNo 
more waltzing Matilda for meSo they collected the cripples, the wounded 
and maimedAnd they shipped us back home to AustraliaThe legless, the 
armless, the blind and insaneThose proud wounded heroes of SuvlaAnd as 
our ship pulled into Circular QuayI looked at the place where me legs used 
to beAnd thanked Christ there was nobody waiting for meTo grieve and to 
mourn and to pityAnd the band played Waltzing MatildaAs they carried 
us down the gangwayBut nobody cheered, they just stood and staredAnd 
they turned all their faces awayAnd now every April I sit on my 
porchAnd I watch the parade pass before meI see my old comrades, how 
proudly they marchReliving their dreams of past gloryI see the old men, 
all twisted and tornThe forgotten heroes of a forgotten warAnd the young 
people ask me, "What are they marching for?"And I ask myself the same 
questionAnd the band plays Waltzing MatildaAnd the old men still 
answer to the callBut year after year their numbers get fewerSome day no 
one will march there at allWaltzing Matilda, Waltzing MatildaWho'll 
go a-waltzing Matilda with me?And their ghosts may be heard as they pass 
the billabong, Who’ll go a-waltzing Matilda with me? 

Eric Bogle’s anti-war version of 
the 19th century Australian song, 
recorded by the 
Pogues.



***


If musicians were only politicians, 
and politicians were musicians, 
we'dlive ina wonderful world with very bad 
music.

patriotic bkgd.jpg

A Pastoral Letter to the President

2003-03-11 Thread Astro



A Pastoral Letter 
to the President
May 8, 2002 
ByRev. Rich Lang

Dear President Bush, 
When you were running for office you 
stated that Jesus Christ was your favorite philosopher. You have made a point of 
proclaiming your Christian faith. You have put time and energy in an attempt to 
link Church mission with state social security. You have, particularly since 
9/11, continually preached God Bless America on almost every public 
occasion. As a Pastor and fellow United Methodist I need to ask you: "Do you 
know what the values and vision of Jesus are?" 
I ask the question because I am baffled 
and confused by your behavior. You claim Christ but act like Caesar. There is 
blood all over your hands with the promise of even more blood to come. You sit 
atop the nations like the Biblical Whore of Babylon openly fornicating with the 
military men of might, their corporate sponsors, their nuclear madness, and 
their insatiable hunger for global armament. Is this how you learned Christ? 

You claim the benevolence of your 
Administration toward the rest of the world. But the treaties you make continue 
to be laced with a tightened rope around the neck of the poor. Is this how you 
learned to "forgive our debtors"? Is it really Christ-like to insist on cuts in 
life-supporting infrastructure while increasing military budgets and allowing 
the plunder of nations to accrue to a very small financial elite? Have you not 
been taught that Jesus was crucified by these same Principalities and Powers? 

You practice a patriotic righteousness 
that visualizes never ending war against enemies of great evil. You bombed 
Afghanistan with both guns and butter to show the difference. But do you really 
think the few crumbs of bread airlifted to Afghanistan shield the reality that 
you have no intention of assisting in building a sustainable society there? Is 
this how Christ taught you to avenge the wrongs done unto you? 
I am troubled by your spirit George. You 
claim you are of the Sustainer of Life but you practice the terror of Death. You 
are spreading the war. Afghanistan is only the beginning. Military presence 
crops up worldwide. You bait us with Iraq and shield what you are doing in 
Columbia. You lay the groundwork for disrupting Venezuela, Brazil and Argentina. 
You allow the dogs of capitalism to sink their teeth into the battered body of a 
raped Central America. The buck stops on your desk George: is this what Jesus 
would do? 
The Spirit of Death rises and nations 
tremble. We the people of the United States tremble. We discover how truly 
powerless we have become. Our military budget grows to obscene levels 
bankrupting the social infrastructure from which our security and freedom rise. 
We see basic medical care costs increase even as more and more Americans find 
themselves without health care. We see environmental treaties subverted, ignored 
and disappeared even as Mother Earth signals increasing distress. Labor rights 
are made secondary to the rights of Corporations resulting in wage reductions 
and growing financial insecurity. Homelessness exposes itself through tented 
cities. Education becomes the victim of budget knife cuts. A few benefit but the 
groan of the masses is growing. Whose side are you on George? 
Perhaps you think that God has chosen you 
for this hour. Perhaps God has. So again I ask you, "is this how you learned 
Christ?" If God has chosen you for this hour then, in Christ's name, serve the 
values and vision of Jesus: feed the hungry, clothe the naked, release the 
prisoners, cancel the debt, forgive your enemies, practice Jubilee. Then, 
through you, this nation and all nations will be blessed. 
But beware George: the road of the sword 
will bring division and much blood. Those who take it up will be devoured by it. 
Many people, in the name of God, have taken up the sword. And many have come to 
ruin. Thinking themselves capable of naming evil they have become the very evil 
they name. 
Seek Christ first, 
Rev. Rich Lang Pastor Trinity 
United Methodist Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Richard Perle: the Lowdown

2003-03-11 Thread Astro


Richard Pearle is a 
traitor

http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/02/10/Richard_Perle_lowdown.html 
Richard Perle: the Lowdown 
David Irving hears: 
WHEN Richard Perle chairman of the 
Pentagon's defence policy board, was working for Senator Scoop Jackson, he was 
investigated by the Justice Department and found to have violated US policies 
relating to unlawful transmission of sensitive classified US information to 
Israel. 
See Paul Findley's They Dare To Speak 
Out, (Chicago, Lawrence Hill Books 1989), Chapter 5, Penetrating the Defense 
at Defense -- and State, page 160:
"An FBI 
  summary of a 1970 wiretap recorded Perle discussing classified information 
  with someone at the Israeli embassy. He came under fire in 1983 when 
  newspapers reported he received substantial payments to represent the 
  interests of an Israeli weapons company. Perle denied conflict of interest, 
  insisting that, although he received payment for these services after he had 
  assumed his position in the Defense Department, he was between government jobs 
  when he worked for the Israeli firm." 
That's odd. When Jonathan Pollard did much the same, passing vital U.S. defense 
secrets to Israel, he was sent to jail for life. What has changed since then, 
one wonders? 
More about the sinister Zionist Richard 
Perle 
Richard Perle told German chancellor Schröder to 
resign 
The Israeli lobby's influence: 
appointments of advisors to White House and Executive Branch 
A disturbing Beirut report on 
Douglas Feith, Bush's new "Dr Goebbels" 

Pentagon hawks make haste 

Robert Fisk exposes President Bush and 
his pro-Israel lobby by name 


The Guardian also unmasks 
Richard Perle and his gang: 
"When he is not too busy at the Pentagon, or too busy 
running Hollinger Digital -- part of the group that publishes the Daily 
Telegraph in Britain -- or at board meetings of the Jerusalem Post, Mr Perle is 
"resident fellow" at one of the thinktanks -- the American Enterprise Institute 
(AEI)." 

The Guardian exposes a US 
"Arab" news agency as a clandestine Israeli Intelligence 
operation | 

Time To Get The Facts Right, By David Welch (Ambassador of the United States 
of America 


Pentagon threatens independent reporters

2003-03-11 Thread Astro



More 
arrogance from the Pentagon. They're only going to show Iraqi troops dressed up 
as Americans committing any atrocities. Count on CNN to bring us the 
truth. I've already committed myself to resist all temptationand 
leave my television set turned off when things get underway. Irefuse 
toparticipate in this made-for-TV spectator event. If there was ever 
a good time to boycott television, this will be the time to do it.

Pentagon Threatens toFire on Independent Reporters in Iraq --The 
Pentagon has threatened to fire on the satellite uplink positions of independent 
journalists in Iraq, according to veteran BBC war correspondent, Kate Adie. In 
an interview with Irish radio, Ms. Adie said that questioned about the 
consequences of such potentially fatal actions, a senior Pentagon officer had 
said: "Who caresThey've been warned." 

http://www.legitgov.org/index.html#breaking_news


A 'Help Wanted' ad found on the web

2003-03-13 Thread Astro





A 'Help Wanted' ad found on the web:http://www.google-watch.org/jobad.html

Deployment Engineer (with security 
clearance)

Spooks on board at Google
Matt Cutts, a software engineer at 
Google since January 2000, used to work for the National Security Agency and has 
a top-secret clearance. Google would like to hire more like him. Can you trust 
Google with a database of all the search terms you've ever used? 



Buget Unveiled Today Contains Large Cuts In Medicare And Veterans Programs

2003-03-13 Thread Astro



House 
Republican Buget Unveiled Today Contains Large Cuts In Medicare, Medicaid, And 
Other Domestic Programs

The budget 
that House Budget Committee Chairman Jim Nussle unveiled today contains deep and 
widespread cuts in basic domestic programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, veterans 
programs, student loans, school lunches, child care, food stamps, cash 
assistance for the elderly and disabled poor, and many other programs. 
If enacted, these would represent the deepest cuts in such programs in 
U.S. history. 

If the 
committees cut all programs within their jurisdictions the cuts would 
include:


· 
$214 billion in Medicare reductions over ten years (the budget 
also provides $400 billion for a Medicare prescription drug 
benefit);
· 
$93 billion in Medicaid, the basic health insurance program for 
low-income families, children, and elderly and disabled 
people;
· 
$15 billion in veterans programs; 
· 
$12 billion in food stamps; and
· 
$7 billion in farm programs.

http://www.cbpp.org/3-12-03bud2-pr.htm

Blue-Ribbon Business Group Issues Stern Warning 
on Deficits And Advises Against Further Tax Cuts 
The report from CED — a highly respected 
research and policy organization that consists of 250 corporate CEO’s, 
university presidents, and similar officials — strongly opposes the 
Administration’s proposals to institute further tax cuts and to make the 2001 
tax cut permanent, because of the effects that such actions would have on 
long-term deficits. CED warns that if no action is taken, projected 
long-term deficits will reach dangerous levels and reduce national income and 
standards of living for future generations. CED calls for a combination of 
spending restraint, Social Security and Medicare reforms, and tax increases to 
meet the very serious long-term fiscal challenges the nation faces.
http://www.cbpp.org/3-12-03bud.htm


Re: 101 Ways To Stop A War On Iraq

2003-03-13 Thread Astro



There are 101 different suggestions on how to stop the 
war.If you don't like one of the suggestions given, there are 100 more to 
choose from.

Astro


Re: 101 Ways To Stop A War On Iraq

2003-03-13 Thread Astro




"I'm sure you're a nice person Astro, 
but let the record show that Astro supports the UN Security Council's authority 
over the united States of America. I don't agree 
with you."

LetWHATRECORD show that I 
support theUnited NationsSecurity Council?

I merely said there are 101 suggestions 
for you to choose from,and ifyou don't like one suggestion then 
choose another.

If Ioffered to buyyou some 
ice cream and we wentinto a icecream parlor that sold101 
different flavors, and you said "but they have pistachio - 
Ican'tstand pistachio!" and I said to you: "yes, but there are 100 
otherdifferent flavors for you to chose from" does that mean that I 
love pistashcio ice cream?

If the truth be known, I have 
extremely mixed and ambivalent feelings about the United Nations. 


For the record: I have not written any 
letters, sent any emailsor made any phone calls to the United 
Nations. Ever.

I thinkmy record unequivocally 
proves - if youchose to examine it- that I have never made any 
personal statements suggesting support for, or endorsement of, the United 
Nations. 

Pleaserefrain frommaking 
suchpretentous assumptionsand false 
accusations.

What I have been doing is making phone 
calls and sending emails to my Congressional representatives,attending 
weekly non-political religous candlelight peace vigils, speaking out as a 
disabled veteran and member of Veterans For Peace, passing along important 
information on the Internet about the lies being perpetrated to the American 
publicby those who arepromoting this war and doing whatever else 
Ican do to support those who are trying to make a difference with the 
ultimate goal of arriving at a peaceful solution. From my 
perspectivethis is not a 
leftwing-rightwing-conservative-liberal-democrat-republican issue. My 
opposition to this war is strictly on moral and ethical 
grounds.

None ofthe activitiesI've 
been involved in over the course of the past year has anythingto 
dowith supporting the United Nations, which in my opinion, is essentially 
irrelevant in light of the fact our chickenhawk brigade in Washington DC is 
going to have their bloody war regardless of what the United Nations chooses to 
do, one way or another.

The only the reason the White House 
warhawksare interacting with the United Nations in the first place 
isbecause they havea misguided belief that in doing so it will give 
their warplans some sort of perceived legitimacy. They 
havecarefully orchestrated theirUnited Nations horse and pony media 
show.They could really care less about the what the UN thinks 
asit's all intentional smoke and mirrors designed to distract attention 
from their real agaenda and ultimate goals. From allappearances, they have failed to 
convince anyone or present a credible compelling case for 
war.

The only thing that will save us now is 
praying to ourAlmighty Lord up in Heaven, and for all concerned citizens 
who oppose the war to really pour on the heatto Congress this coming 
week. 

Now is the timeto speak out and 
make our feelings known to everyone in Washington DC. The hour 
isbecomingextremely late andour freedoms and lives are at 
stake. 

Hoping for a peaceful 
solution,

Astro




Re: A Slap at France, Brown-Waite's Bill Would Bring the Boys Home

2003-03-14 Thread Astro




I called Miss Ginny's Washington DC office 
yesterday. I talked to her idiot assistant and read him the riot act and 
told him to tell his birdbrained boss that our fallen heros already are at home. 

Our military cemetaries in France are 
sovereign United States property, justthe same as all of our embassies. 


The French citizens maintain our veteran's 
cemetaries better than we do here in our own country. The French have the 
highest respect for those soldiers.Our French 
veteran'scemetariesare beautifully landscaped and 
magnificently manicured, the grass looks as though it was combed by hand. 
The French schoolchildren are assigned individual graves and every year on June 
6th they place flowers on every single grave and there are literally tens of 
thousands of them.


All of us have relatives buried overseas if 
you go back far enough. Are we going dig up all of our ancestors also? Leave it 
to a sleazy politician to use our dead war heros in some cheap attempt to garner 
publicity. Some Americans think we should 
adopt an isolationist policy toward the rest of the world. It's funny how much 
the rest of the world agrees with them.

Has anyone suggested a bill to ship back the 
Statue of Liberty? Or sell back the former Louisiana Territory? Or stop teaching 
French in schools? Or boycotting Blockbuster until they alter titles like: The 
French Connection?

Ginny Brown-Waite is a freshman, or junior, 
representative in Congress and she is already a member of the House 
Veterans Committee. She is culpable for the state of our VA hospitals and the 
way our government treatsour veterans with intentional indifference. 
Thefact that we have homeless veterans in the United States of 
America is a national scandal and disgrace.


Maybe France should pass a bill to bring home 
the Statue of Liberty, and then help hand the US back to the British Empire. One 
thing that people tend to miss in this whole debate is that 
France,remembers better than many, and certainly better than America, what 
war means andunderstands the devastation of losing an entire generation of 
young men; knows the pain of burying their dead and rebuilding their towns; 
knows what it's like to have an enemy who wants nothing better than to see you 
fall. Maybe this is why France is loath to pave a path to war; not because 
they want to "take a stand" against America or have any personal vendetta 
against anyone, but because they better than anyone know what war means, and 
want to prevent it if at all possible. 


I don't know why some people can't grasp the 
concept that some one can actually hold twoindependent ideas at the same 
time about something. Yes, it's possible for the French to respect America for 
its assistance in WWII and at the same time oppose the invasion of Iraq. Just 
as, if a person had anyintelligence whatsoever,they should be able 
to respect Frances' assistance to America in the Revolutionary War 
andunderstand France's current position regarding Iraq and not act like 
little childrenthrowing temper tantrums because some one else disagrees 
with them.


President Chirac's efforts to find a way to 
disarm Saddam without getting American troops killed is not an act of effrontery 
or hatred toward the United States. What if France decided they wanted to oust 
the regime in Saudi Arabia? They're not exactly paragons in their 
treatment of their own people. Suppose France decided they were going to invade 
Saudi Arabia and install a new government. Would we jump right in and lend 
a hand or would we say "wait, let's think this thing over first."? So why 
should we expect other countries to jump to our whims? Just because George 
W. Bush says so? France doesn't want to start another war. So what. Neither does 
90% of the rest of the world right want to start another war. 


We're sure showing France a thing or two! 
First we rename our junk and breakfastfood and now we're going to 
take backall our dead people. I sure hope this teaches them a lesson. This 
country is full of idiotic five-year-olds masquerading as Congressional 
representatives. I hope someone is keepinga recordof all this 
stupidity. Let this be the last term these children serve.
Is it anywonder why other people hate 
the Unites States when we have crackpot lunatics like Miss Ginny in 
Congress???

I encourage everyone to call, write or fax 
Miss Ginny and express their feelingsabout her proposed 
legislation!

Astro


Web 
Site: www.house.gov/brown-waiteE-mail: 
Contact Via 'Write Your 
Rep.'Washington 
Office1516 Longworth House Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 
20515-0905Phone: (202) 
225-1002Fax: (202) 
226-6559
Main District 
Office38008 
Meridian Ave.Dade City, FL 33526Phone: (352) 567-6707Fax: (352) 
567-6259
BrooksvillePhone: (352) 799-8354Fax: (352) 799-8776Address:20 North Main St., Rm. 
200Brooksville, FL 
34601




Check out and sign the Cats For Peace petition

2003-03-15 Thread Astro



Calling all peace loving felines! Is your cat 
against the war?

- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 5:33 PM
Subject: [WendysWords] Check out Sign the Kitty Petition
Click here: Sign the 
Petition WEN 

image/jpeg

Poor Tony Blair wakes up

2003-03-16 Thread Astro
Title: Message


Poor Tony Blair wakes up The 
prime minister thought he could sagely steer his impetuous American friends away 
from actions they would later regret. It turns out they were just playing him 
for a patsy Terry JonesSunday March 16, 
2003 It's not easy when you find out that 
your friends have been using you as a chump. 
Tony Blair must have been really sick this week when Donald 
Rumsfeld casually let drop that Mr.Bush and his team couldn't give a toss about 
Britain sending soldiers to Iraq. Truth is, they'd probably prefer it if we 
didn't, but our participation at least means they can pretend it's an 
international force. 
But I bet Tony feels terribly slighted - after all he's gone 
through to prove his devotion to the ideals of extremist Republican militarism. 
He's practically split his party, put his own leadership in jeopardy and made 
himself look thoroughly ill in the process. And what has he got out of it? A few 
pats on the back and nice Christmas card from the White House, I expect. 
I mean it's simply not fair. Here he is - Prime Minister of 
Great Britain (just) - and he's doing everything he possibly can including 
leaning over backwards and licking his own bottom. He's spending vast amounts of 
money he hasn't got on sending men to the Gulf. He's put his entire nation in 
the front line for terrorist reprisals. He's upset his other admirers in Europe, 
and - to cap it all - he's put his name to a plan that is not just plain stupid 
but is actually wicked, and in return? Zilch. 
All the contracts for reconstructing Iraq are to go to 
American companies - preferably ones like Haliburton, which remain such good 
friends with their old boss vice-president Dick Cheney. But not a single British 
company is to benefit from all the mayhem and destruction that the bombing is 
going to cause. 
Poor old Tony doesn't even get a bone. 
I suppose he should have been more careful about who he was 
playing with in the first place. 
But they took him for a sucker. 
He thought he'd be able to cut a decent figure as the elder 
statesman, sagely steering his impetuous American friends away from actions they 
would later regret. And for that he was prepared to subscribe to the most 
hawkish, aggressive regime that has ever held power in the good ole US of A. A 
regime whose planners spelled out their schemes for American military world 
domination in a report for the Project for the New American Century published in 
September 2000, before the George Bush seized power. (You can look it up on 
www.newamericancentury.org). 
Their aim, they say in their report, is "to shape a new 
century favourable to American principles and interests". And they make it quite 
clear that they envisage achieving those aims not by diplomacy but through 
military might. For which reason they need "increase defense spending gradually 
to a minimum level of 3.5 to 3.8 percent of gross national product, adding $15 
billion to $20 billion to total defense spending annually." 
At the time they knew there was little hope of the American 
public buying into such imperialistic dreams. What was needed they said in their 
pre Sept 11th report was: "some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new 
Pearl Harbour." Well the dreams came true. 
And now it's quite obvious that instead of Mr Rumsfeld and 
Mr. Cheney listening attentively to Mr Blair's sage advice, they've simply been 
using him as a patsy - a convenient fig-leaf. 
Tony Blair has merely been helping to give Mr. Bush's 
barbaric planners for World domination credibility amongst the American public. 

The only conceivable hope of stopping their militaristic 
global ambitions is for the rest of the world to oppose them. There might then 
be some hope that the American public would wake up to what sort of a government 
they currently have. The reawakening of American democracy is the only hope for 
a future world that is not ridden by terrorism and global warfare. 
· Terry Jones writes regularly for The 
Observer. To all those readers who have written in to ask if this Terry Jones 
had anything to do with Monty Python, the answer is 
yes.


The High Price of Bad Diplomacy

2003-03-16 Thread Astro



Good article. Remarks from 
Business Week onBush's imperalistic behavior

The 
High Price of Bad DiplomacyMismanaging the runup to war will 
do more than squander goodwill and damage allianceshttp://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/03_12/b3825801.htm 


A Warmonger explains war to a Peacenik

2003-03-16 Thread Astro




A Warmonger explains war to a 
Peacenik
PeaceNik: Why did you say we are we invading 
Iraq?WarMonger: We are invading Iraq because it is in violation of 
security council resolution 1441. A country cannot be allowed to violate 
security council resolutions.PN: But I thought many of our allies, 
including Israel, were in violation of more security council resolutions than 
Iraq.WM: It's not just about UN resolutions. The main point is that Iraq 
could have weapons of mass destruction, and the first sign of a smoking gun 
could well be a mushroomcloud over NY.PN: Mushroom cloud? But I 
thought the weapons inspectors said Iraq had no nuclear weapons.WM: Yes, 
but biological and chemical weapons are the issue.PN: But I thought Iraq 
did not have any long range missiles for attacking us or our allies with such 
weapons.WM: The risk is not Iraq directly attacking us, but rather 
terrorists networks that Iraq could sell the weapons to.PN: But coundn't 
virtually any country sell chemical or biological materials? We sold quite a bit 
to Iraq in the eighties ourselves, didn't we?WM: That's ancient history. 
Look, Saddam Hussein is an evil man that has an undeniable track record of 
repressing his own people since the early eighties. He gasses hisenemies. 
Everyone agrees that he is a power-hungry lunatic murderer.PN: We sold 
chemical and biological materials to a power-hungry lunatic murderer?WM: 
The issue is not what we sold, but rather what Saddam did. He is the one that 
launched a pre-emptive first strike on Kuwait.PN: A pre-emptive first 
strike does sound bad. But didn't our ambassador to Iraq, April Gillespie, know 
about and green-light the invasion of Kuwait?WM: Let's deal with the 
present, shall we? As of today, Iraq could sell its biological and chemical 
weapons to Al Quaida. Osama BinLaden himself released an audio tapecalling 
on Iraqis to suicide-attack us, proving a partnership between the 
two.PN: Osama Bin Laden? Wasn't the point of invading Afghanistan to 
kill him?WM: Actually, it's not 100% certain that it's really Osama Bin 
Laden on the tapes. But the lesson from the tape is the same: there could easily 
be a partnership betweenal-Qaida and Saddam Hussein unless we 
act.PN: Is this the same audio tape where Osama Bin Laden labels Saddam 
a secular infidel?WM: You're missing the point by just focusing on the 
tape. Powell presented a strong case against Iraq.PN: He did?WM: 
Yes, he showed satellite pictures of an Al Quaeda poison factory in 
Iraq.PN: But didn't that turn out to be a harmless shack in the part of 
Iraq controlled by the Kurdish opposition?WM: And a British intelligence 
report...PN: Didn't that turn out to be copied from an out-of-date 
graduate student paper?WM: And reports of mobile weapons 
labs...PN: Weren't those just artistic renderings?WM: And 
reports of Iraqis scuttling and hiding evidence from inspectors...PN: 
Wasn't that evidence contradicted by the chief weapons inspector, Hans 
Blix?WM: Yes, but there is plenty of other hard evidence that cannot be 
revealed because it would compromise our security.PN: So there is no 
publicly available evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?WM: 
The inspectors are not detectives, it's not their JOB to find evidence. You're 
missing the point.PN: So what is the point?WM: The main point is 
that we are invading Iraq because resolution 1441 threatened "severe 
consequences." If we do not act, the security council will become an 
irrelevantdebating society.PN: So the main point is to uphold the 
rulings of the security council?WM: Absolutely. ...unless it rules 
against us.PN: And what if it does rule against us?WM: In that 
case, we must lead a coalition of the willing to invade Iraq.PN: 
Coalition of the willing? Who's that?WM: Britain, Turkey, Bulgaria, 
Spain, and Italy, for starters.PN: I thought Turkey refused to help us 
unless we gave them tens of billions of dollars.WM: Nevertheless, they 
may now be willing.PN: I thought public opinion in all those countries 
was against war.WM: Current public opinion is irrelevant. The majority 
expresses its will by electing leaders to make decisions.PN: So it's the 
decisions of leaders elected by the majority that is important?WM: 
Yes.PN: But George Bush wasn't elected by voters. He was selected by the 
U.S. Supreme C...-WM: I mean, we must support the decisions of our 
leaders, however they were elected, because they are acting in our best 
interest. This is about being a patriot. That'sthe bottom line.PN: 
So if we do not support the decisions of the president, we are not 
patriotic?WM: I never said that.PN: So what are you saying? Why 
are we invading Iraq?WM: As I said, because there is a chance that they 
have weapons of mass destruction that threaten us and our allies.PN: But 
the inspectors have not been able to find any such weapons.WM: Iraq is 
obviously hiding them.PN: You know this? How?WM: Because we know 
they had the weapons ten years ago, and they are 

Vietnam 2 Checklist

2003-03-18 Thread Astro




Vietnam 2 Checklist
1. Cabal of oldsters who won't listen to 
outside advice? Check.2. No understanding of ethnicities of the many 
locals? Check.

3. Imposing country boundaries drawn in 
Europe, not by the locals? Check.4. Unshakeable faith in our superior 
technology? Check.

5. France secretly hoping we fall on our 
asses? Check.6. Russia secretly hoping we fall on our asses? 
Check.7. China secretly hoping we fall on our asses? Check.8. 
SecDef pushing a conflict the JCS never wanted? Check.9. Fear we'll look 
bad if we back down now? Check.10. Corrupt Texan in the WH? 
Check.11. Land war in Asia? Check.12. Right unhappy with outcome 
of previous war? Check.13. Enemy easily moves in/out of neighboring 
countries? Check.14. Soldiers about to be dosed with *our own* 
chemicals? Check.15. Friendly fire problem ignored instead of solved? 
Check.16. Anti-Americanism up sharply in Europe? Check.17. B-52 
bombers? Check.

18. Helicopters that clog 
up on the local dust? Check.19. In-fighting among the branches of the 
military? Check.20. Locals that cheer us by day, hate us by night? 
Check.21. Local experts ignored? Check.22. Local politicians 
ignored? Check.23. Locals used to conflicts lasting longer than the USA 
has been a country? Check.24. Against advice, Prez won't raise taxes to 
pay for war? Check.25. Blue water navy ships operating in brown water? 
Check.26. Use of nukes hinted at if things don't go our way? 
Check.27. Unpopular war? Check.VIETNAM 2 YOU ARE CLEARED TO TAXI 
Ivan BergerNo trees were killed in the sending of this message. 
However a large number ofelectrons were terribly 
inconvenienced.


IMPORTANT IMPEACHMENT ALERT

2003-03-18 Thread Astro



Fax or email Rep. Conyers supporting 
Impeachment and Removal from office of the entire Bush Administration. They are 
NOT introducing articles of impeachment now. They are only tallying votes FOR 
and AGAINST impeachment as of this moment. 

The phones are currently ringing off the 
hook, so please send a brief message stating whether you are for or against 
impeachment via email or fax: fax 313-226-2085[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Re: I need some help...

2003-03-19 Thread Astro






KC,

Download the free versions Spybot and Ad Aware. RunBOTH of them and clean out all the cookies and spywarehidden in yourPC (unless of course Ashcroft and Pointdexter have insertedsecret filesinour PC's that these programs won't detect). 

It's good idea to backup all your important files includingyour address book and bookmarks so it's it not a totaldisaster if everything crashes or ifyou have to reformat your hard drive. If your running Windows it's always agoodidea to periodically reformat your hard drive anyway. Irun Spybot and Ad Awareevery other week or so and delete EVERYTHINGthat's been detected. 

Of course I have to reset all my passwords after doing this, butthat's a small price to pay and not a big deal if you've written all your passwords on a piece of paper so youwon't forget them.

Spybot Search and Destroy: http://spybot.safer-networking.de/
Lavasoft Ad Aware: http://www.lavasoftusa.com/software/adaware/

Good luck!

Astro
---Original Message---


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 13:49:10
To: power hour friends
Subject: I need some help...

I have been having something happen..an attachment has been putting itself in my email
Some kind of dll file, promo...however virus scans (mine) dont reconginze it and delete the email as undetermined..I saved it and did a separate scan and it is virus free...however my messages will be deleted by the anti-virus scans. MY Question is does any one here have savvy to understand pc codes? So I know what this is...If it is spyware? 
Thaks, KC

"The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."-- Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334http://www.patriotsforpeace.org/http://www.winwithoutwarus.org/http://www.truemajority.org/http://www.notinourname.net/http://www.endthewar.org/http://www.internationalanswer.org/http://www.peacepledge.org/http://www.citiesforpeace.org/**Ain't Karma A Bitch!


 








 IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here

Something is Terribly Wrong in America

2003-03-19 Thread Astro




I believe 
history will judge Cynthia McKinney in a much more favorable light than those 
who have recently demonized her.

Something is Terribly Wrong in America
by CYNTHIA McKINNEY
(Remarks at March 15 Anti-War Rally San 
Francisco, California.)
We stand 
here together. Shoulder to shoulder. Refusing to be denied the right to say no 
to George Bush's war!
This Iraq war is about oil and regional 
interests.
If it was about ending tyranny, 
destroying weapons of mass destruction, and restoring democracy to Iraq then 
George Bush's father could have done that in 1991. But he didn't. Saddam Hussein 
and his murderous regime were kept in power.
And if we care about civilians suffering 
under the heel of brutal regimes, and if we really want to defend human rights 
worldwide, why are we starting and stopping at Iraq?
Why not do something about the suffering 
in Congo, Sierra Leone, Sudan, Burma, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Tibet, Afghanistan, 
just to name a few?
But as we all know nothing will be 
done.
In fact our military forces and 
intelligence agencies may actually even worsen the suffering in those countries 
because it suits our interests to do so. Just like when the American government 
killed Salvadore Allende and replaced him with Augusto Pinochet.
American style regime change is nothing 
new.
But when we dare to stand up and tell the 
truth about how unjust this war is and question the motivations of its 
protagonists we are called unpatriotic and accused of hating our 
flag.
I don't hate my country and I certainly 
don't hate my flag. In fact I love them so much I refuse to be quiet!
No more should we allow special interests 
to lead yet another generation of young Americans off to war.
Our Founding Father, George Washington, 
in his Farewell Address of 1796, warned us about the false patriots who would 
wrap themselves in the American flag and at the same time sell our precious 
American values to special interests.
George Washington didn't know it then, 
but we know it now, that he was talking about people like George W. Bush who 
would betray our values and our country in pursuit of an unnecessary 
war.
You, gathered here today, are the true 
patriots.
The day our streets are free from 
protestors like you will be the day our democracy is dead.
Those of us who oppose Bush's war span 
the spectrum.
We are conservative, radical â¤" 
Democrats, Republicans, Independents, Reform, and we are Green.
We come from all walks of 
life.
We are the thinkers and the workers that 
make America strong.
We are all religions and we are all races 
joined together today.
That's why George W. Bush proposes to 
spend $200 million on a public relations campaign to convince you and the world 
that war in Iraq is justified. Telling the truth shouldn't be so 
expensive.
If war in Iraq is truly justified and is 
about restoring freedoms to the people of Iraq then why doesn't the Bush 
Administration restore our freedoms here at home?
Why does the San Francisco Police 
Department need to collect, in violation of their own department rules, dossiers 
on peaceful anti-war protesters?
What does our government fear from 
us?
The Bush Administration has even failed 
to convince our most important opinion leaders when it comes to war and peace: 
the veterans.
Veterans increasingly are being counted 
among the ranks of anti-war protesters. Why? Because more than anyone else, our 
veterans know the horror of war.
They know it's easy to talk about war if 
you've never been to war.
They know the horror of coming back to 
face the Pentagon and the Department of Veterans Affairs for help with 
post-traumatic stress syndrome, Gulf War syndrome, exposure to Agent Orange and 
depleted uranium, cancer, birth defects, Lou Gehrig's disease, infertility, 
memory loss, and homelessness.
In fact, 25% of all our homeless are 
veterans. And they sleep on the streets of America every night. Many even living 
across the street from the White House.
While our military spend billions of 
dollars on aircraft, ships, tanks, and laser guided missiles $25 billion already 
just to get the troops in position for this war-- our government can't give a 
warm meal and shelter to the veterans who have served our country and who are 
now in need.
Something is terribly wrong; and that's 
the thanks of a grateful nation.
Now President Bush would have you believe 
that he cares about our young service men and women.
But he doesn't.
Just like he doesn't care about the 
veterans.
And let us remember . . .
George Bush, Dick Cheney, Richard Perle, 
Paul Wolfowitz, where were you when America needed you?
Part of that $200 million in public 
relations money the Administration is spending is to make us think that George 
Bush follows in the footsteps of the world's greatest wartime 
leaders.
But while Saddam Hussein can be counted 
among the world's tyrants, George W. Bush is no Franklin Delano Roosevelt and 
Tony Blair is no Winston Churchill.
Because now the entire 

IRAQI TROOPS NOW EATING LIVE BABIES

2003-03-20 Thread Astro



Note: disclaimer at the bottom of this article says this is a 
"SATIRE" 

Who ever wrote this has a 
verySICKSENSE OF HUMORif 
you ask me!



BOOKMARK THIS SITE FOR UNCENSORED COVERAGEWAR SHOCK LATEST:IRAQI TROOPS NOWEATING LIVE BABIES
20th March, 2003 02:30 GMThttp://www.GuluFuture.comBy 
Makup Aniol Shyte, BBCNN 20 March 2003 Iraqi 
troops around the port city of Basra came under sustained fire late Wednesday 
after Allied commanders ordered an early attack to stop Iraqi looting, 
pillaging, raping and cooking of live infants, local sources have stated. 

Advancing allied forces came across makeshift ovens 
in vacated Iraqi positions around the city, which contained the partly cooked 
bodies of babies, said an allied spokesperson speaking on condition of 
anonimity.
"Apparently, they have been without food supplies for weeks now and 
have taken to snatching babies from local women and consuming them in front of 
the mothers beore raping the women," the spokesperson said.Official 
sources are still refusing to confirm the reports, but would not rule them out 
as a trigger for the allied advance. But a military spokesperson did confirm 
that Iraqi soldiers have been looting shops and breaking into homes to steal 
from locals."There comes a point where you have to take action to defend 
the local Iraqi population against intolerable abuses," said Major Slauter 
Hardon of the British 7th Armoured brigade. "We reached that position late on 
Wednesday."
However, he refused to comment on reports that British troops have 
been turning away hordes of Iraqi soldiers who are seeking to surrender to 
allied units."I really cannot confirm that," he said, "but we simply do 
not have the facilities or capability to cater for mass surrenders this early in 
the campaign. Best thing for Iraqi soldiers no longer keen to support this evil 
dictator would be to drop their weapons and go home."
INCUBATORSMeanwhile, American convoys moving towards Umm Qasr 
have reportedly detained a unit of fleeing Iraqi soldiers with incubators likely 
stolen from the local hospital."The incubators still had babies inside," 
said an officer who refused to identify himself to reporters. "At least in the 
last Gulf war they had the decency to remove the babies before stealing the 
incubators. Probably they intended to eat them at some point."According 
to other unnamed sources, Allied advances have been slowed by having to clear 
starving Iraqi soldiers kneeling in the middle of the roads begging food from 
advancing American troops.FLEEING
In late developments, a US military spokesman refused to confirm 
reports that a plane carrying Saddam Hussein had escaped being shot down as the 
toppled dictator fled to Jordan, because he has forced some of the "human 
shield" peace protestors to board the plane with him.
Also, late Wednesday force commanders in the Basra area confirmed 
that they had bombed "command and control" positions which had been cleverly 
disguised as churches, hospitals and civillian housing.According to 
others who have returned from bombing missions, Iraqi psychological warfare 
brigades have taken to dressing themselves up as civillians and lying on the 
ground around strategic villages pretending to have their arms and legs blown 
off."We've been here before you know," one officer told reporters at a 
post raid briefing. "We are not going to fall for such tired old tricks." 
"Bet you the next thing is the Iraqi elite Republican Guard will begin 
shelling and bombing non-military targets in a pathetic effort to incriminate us 
in these types of actions," allegedly said an unnamed local commander, speaking 
on condition of anonymous anonimity, according to unconfirmed 
reports.Notes:  The use of the term 
"allied commanders" means commanders of the forces of countries which have 
allied with each other in this war to liberate Iraq. It is not a cheap trick to 
play off the use of the same term to describe command structures in the Second 
World War.  The use of the words "liberate Iraq" means allow 
democratic structures be established. The issue of the sale of Iraqi natural 
resources and infrastructure to multinational corporations at knockdown prices 
is beyond the mission objectives of Allied commanders.CAUTION:  War fanatical members of the public who 
happen across this report shoud beware that this is in fact a SATIRICAL article. 
 Satire is a form of wry black comedy which relates 
essential truths in an oblique manner. Persons with war-focussed tunnel vision 
have been known to mistake this type of material for factual 
reporting..
BOOKMARK THIS SITE FOR UNCENSORED 
COVERAGEWAR SHOCK 
LATEST:IRAQI TROOPS NOWEATING LIVE 
BABIES
20th March, 2003 02:30 GMThttp://www.GuluFuture.comBy 
Makup Aniol Shyte, BBCNN 20 March 2003 Iraqi 
troops around the port city of Basra came under sustained fire late Wednesday 
after Allied commanders ordered an early attack to stop Iraqi looting, 
pillaging, raping and cooking of live 

An explainatioin and my apologies

2003-03-21 Thread Astro



Dear Joyce and Dave and friends of the Power Hour,I have been 
informed that I should not haveposted the Iraqi baby eaterstory to 
this list because it was inappropriate and "garbage" and that thePower Hour 
is about exposing the truth.Kindly allow me a few words of 
explaination. That is precisely why I postedit - so everyone could see 
that it is indeed garbage and to expose it sothat the truth may be 
known.That particular story was posted on What Really Happened 
yesterday, one ofthe most highly visited websites on the Internet, and 
although I have havenot personally communicated with the website's owner, 
Mike Rivero, I wouldassume that is why he also posted it. To expose it as 
dangerous garbage.We all know how quickly Internet rumors spread. 
I personally believe -although I have no proof - that the baby eater article 
may be sinisterblack-ops and the writer put a sly disclaimer on it saying it 
was "satire"to protect himself - but knowing full well that some other sick 
idiot mightread it, grab it, perform a quick cut and paste job - 
deletely thedisclaimer - and then start passing it on as fact. This is 
how Internetrumors and so-called urban legends get started. There are plenty 
of gulliblepeople out there that would believe such a story like this, 
especially afterthe fabricated incubator stories of 1991. Sure, we all 
know those storiesare faked, but think of how many people there are who do 
not possess theknowledge and information we do, and who probably still 
accept the 1991incubator stories as a fact. Now that is a truly scary 
thought.I'm appalled and disgusted by this story as much as any of you 
are. Mypurpose for posting it was to bring it to everyone's attention 
so that itcould be nipped in the bud and stopped dead in it's tracks. The 
best way tostop rumors and misinformation is to expose them far and 
wide.If my intentions have been misconstrued, I profusely aspologize to 
everyone.I'm not a secret government disinformation agent or provocateur and 
I haveno devious hidden agendas. I don't play games, I'm up front with 
everyoneabout my beliefs and opinions and I tell people what I think. Even 
if peopledisagree with me - which is fine, and many people do - they usually 
respectmy honesty. I take great personal pride in being honest and 
maintaining mycredibilty. That's all I have, I value it more than anything 
else, and Iwill defend it to the end.For what ever it's worth, I've 
been following Joyce and Dave's work sinceI996 when I first received a copy 
of their Gulf War video which helped me tostart seeing through all the lies 
and deception. Joyce and Dave have helpedopen my eyes to many other 
acts of government corruption and deception and Ithank God for leading me to 
them. I consider them as trusted friends and mypersonal teachers who have 
educated me and raised my awareness on manyimportant issues over the 
years.I'm a disabled veteran and I strongly support Joyce and Dave's 
work andlisten to the Power Hour every day. I stand shoulder to shoulder 
with themin their committment and determination to support and defend all of 
ourveterans - and exposing the truth. We may not agree on everything, 
butthere is no quarrel on these core beliefs.I sincerely apologize 
if I have offended anyone by trying to expose garbageand trash for what it 
is. I believe it's better to know about something - nomatter how awful it is 
- so that if an awful rumor such as this ever shouldget started, we know 
where it came from and can immediately dismiss it forwhat it is.I 
assure you I would never intentionally do anything to discredit Joyce orDave 
or the Power Hour or any of it's efforts as I have nothing but thehighest 
respect for them and everyone on this list. If anyone believes Ihave used 
poor judgement, I can accept your opinions and humbly acknowledgethem. I 
would only ask for your kind forgiveness. I have been guilty ofusing poor 
judgement in the past, but fortunately I keep learning from mymistakes by 
the Grace of God.Regardless of what your final decision is, I will 
continue to support Daveand Joyce and the Power Hour.Respectfully 
yours,Warren GammelOcala, Florida


Bush's Groom and Gloom

2003-03-21 Thread Astro





  
  

  My true 
  feelings aboutthe following2 items are unprintable. 
  "Extremely disgruntled" is a polite understatement.
  
  
  A BuzzFlash News Analysis
  

  

  March 21, 2003

  

  


  
Bush's 
  Groom and Gloom 
  BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS
  As reported in the Washington Post, the White 
  House is quite peeved that video of Bush getting groomed and acting jolly 
  was broadcast prior to his "we're bombing Iraq" announcement:
  
The White House is vowing a strong retaliatory 
response after the BBC aired live video of President Bush getting his 
hair coiffed in the Oval Office as he squirmed in his chair and 
practiced on the teleprompter minutes before Wednesday night's speech 
announcing the launch of military operations against Saddam Hussein. 
(See: Link)

  Many BuzzFlash Readers have asked us where they can 
  see these videos. You can download videos of that broadcast from the 
  globalfreepress web site at the URL below:
  
http://news.globalfreepress.com/images/wonk/VariousMovies2/
[Link Update: BuzzFlash Readers have been having 
difficulty accessing the above link, we imagine due to the traffic. You 
may find more luck trying it again later in the evening or over the 
weekend, or you can visit the The Smoking Gun for a shorter version of 
the footage: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/gbhair1.html.]
  As reported by Knight Ridder Newspapers (See: Link), "Minutes before the speech, an internal 
  television monitor showed the president pumping his fist. "Feels good," he 
  said." Although BuzzFlash could not accurately point to that moment, 
  something else about the broadcast bothered us.
  When you watch the videos, think about the fact that 
  Bush is about to tell the world that he's sending our soldiers to possibly 
  die, but definitely to kill innocent people in Iraq as our military bombs 
  and shoots its way to Saddam. Think about that and contrast that with 
  Bush's jovial, playful attitude, seen unfiltered in the Dutch broadcast 
  (digitized in the 11.3M "BushGroomed2.mpg"):
  
  Hey, Bush, it sure is funny thinking about all those 
  innocent Iraqi women and children who are going to die painful and 
  horrible deaths because of your bombs, isn't it? Just downright slap-happy 
  funny. We bet you haven't had this much fun since you mocked Karla Faye 
  Tucker's plea for clemency (See: Link) and 
  executed at least 135 people while Governor of Texas (See: Link | Link 2).
  And then the show really begins and Bush puts on his 
  face of concern and tempered anxiety. What a farce. What a shameful, 
  despicable farce. Every moment fabricated.
  And now, back to the war coverage.
  
  
  W DOESN'T HAVE THE COURAGE TO 
  WATCH THE BOMBING 03-21-03Ari Fleischer is taking fairly 
  hostile questions from the press right now.Apparently the folks in the 
  press are nearly as horrified by the bombardmentas I am.Ari 
  just admitted that W didn't watch the bombing. What a coward, huh? 
  Youought to see what YOU have authorized. It's YOUR doing 
  buddy.How many times is Ari going to make that lame and completely 
  discredited9/11-Saddam-Al-Qaeda link argument?This is an 
  immoral administration that will say or do anything to advanceits 
  goals.Today is certainly all the proof you need of 
  that.Update: I'm told W is already on his way to take a weekend 
  off at CampDavid. We're in the middle of a war and this joker leaves 
  Washington?Now that's commitment to his job, eh?
  
  He ordered the airstrikes and then, with 
  his tail between his legs, W promptly headed out of town
  http://hnn.us/articles/900.html#12260201