Re: Question | mGSD 3.1.8b -Exclude Sub-Projects from Active Projects

2011-12-15 Thread DDdW
oh wow, that's awesome. Works like a charm!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GTD 
TiddlyWiki group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/gtd-tiddlywiki/-/HW2kDg7v5iQJ.
To post to this group, send email to gtd-tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
gtd-tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/gtd-tiddlywiki?hl=en.



Re: [tw] Re: TiddlyWiki Development News

2011-12-15 Thread Jeremy Ruston
 I've been doing a lot of research and playing around in the tools
 that transform markup space recently, and would **implore** you to
 consider choosing one of the more mainstream cross-platform syntaxes
 rather than re-implementing a proprietary TWmarkup, even if it may be
 based on one of them.

The primary constraint I am embracing is to retain compatibility as
far as possible with existing TiddlyWIki markup. I think that that
rules out the wholesale adoption of a standard format - for instance,
TiddlyWiki gets [[pretty|links]] the wrong way round from most wikis.

To get around the limitations imposed by that constraint, we have the
idea of pluggable parsers and renderers, so that it is possible to
adopt other formats, and intermingle them and so on. If you can find a
JavaScript parser for it, then hopefully you'll be able to use it.

 Markdown is a popular choice, lots of active development in the
 Pandocs project - their extensions may be a bit proprietary, but
 since the focus of the whole project is interoperability, it's for a
 good cause.

Adopting MarkDown in its entirety is a bit troublesome from my
perspective; it's not very formally defined, and the only
implementations that I've seen are even hairier balls of regexps than
the old TiddlyWIki wikifier. It also lacks what I'd have thought of as
basic features, like tables, arguing that users should write HTML tags
for them.

 Other candidates are txt2tags and reST/Sphinx, with the former having
 the edge in a huge number of output formats currently supported. Both
 of these are implemented in Python, while Pandocs is Haskell, if that
 means anything.

I need JavaScript code, obviously. There may be bits and pieces worth
taking from those projects, but a brief glance shows that they take in
concerns that don't entirely match TiddlyWiki, so I don't see a way to
wholesale adopt those syntaxes.

 IMO the key is to **not** pick and choose bits and pieces, but to take
 on an entire **syntax spec as a whole**.

I only see that as feasible if there was a spec out there that was (a)
compatible with TiddlyWiki and (b) did everything that TiddlyWiki
needs and (c) didn't include lots of features that aren't relevant for
TiddlyWiki and (d) had usable JavaScript code.

 This would enable plugging TW into a standardized toolchain so that it
 can be either a publishing and distribution target, along with say
 EPUB, AsciiDoc and HTMLhelp, or perhaps even the location where the
 master source text is edited, to then be able to output and
 transform to such formats. NB I consider TW's forte to be the former
 rather than the latter, but something like Pandocs would give the
 flexibility to go in either direction.

As I say, the ability to have pluggable parsers and renderers should
give you the capabilities you want. For you, the native TiddlyWiki
format might just be what gets used for the application plumbing, with
all your content being in other formats.

 But please **please** don't just throw another proprietary wikiMarkup
 syntax set into the mix, this is an historic opportunity to contribute
 to the idea of open data in the larger ecosystem rather than
 continuing to view tiddlers as an isolated silo needing custom coding
 to extract inline markup semantics.

I'm not planning to throw another proprietary wiki markup into the
mix. I'm planning to improve TiddlyWiki's existing markup so that it
isn't broken with respect to paragraphs, and to introduce some
alternative syntaxes for some simple formatting.

 Thanks in advance for at least considering these ideas. . .

As I say, I think the kinds of things you're interested in are enabled
by the parsing/rendering architecture. I would very much appreciate
feedback on the improvements to the wikitext.

Best wishes

Jeremy

 /rant

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 TiddlyWiki group.
 To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TiddlyWiki group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.



Re: [tw] Re: TiddlyWiki Development News

2011-12-15 Thread Martin Budden
I concur with HansBKK that you should adopt a standard wiki markup for
TW 5. I differ from in that I think you should adopt WikiCreole see:

http://www.wikicreole.org/wiki/Creole1.0
and
http://www.wikicreole.org/wiki/CreoleAdditions

The main reason for this recommendation is the WikiCreole markup is
*very* similar to TW markup. The main differences being the handling
of bold, headings and links. WikiCreole even recommends using double
angle brackets for plugins.

Since TW 5 is going to break compatibility, then I think it should
also take the opportunity to move to a standard wiki format. I know
text compatibility and code compatibility are different things, but
nevertheless I believe this is the correct way forward.

Note TW 5 could support standard TW wikiformat using a plugin, and
also could provide a converter so that people can easily move their
text from TW format to WikiCreole format. Since the formats are so
similar, conversion would be fairly straightforward.

Martin

On 15 December 2011 09:22, Jeremy Ruston jeremy.rus...@gmail.com wrote:
 I've been doing a lot of research and playing around in the tools
 that transform markup space recently, and would **implore** you to
 consider choosing one of the more mainstream cross-platform syntaxes
 rather than re-implementing a proprietary TWmarkup, even if it may be
 based on one of them.

 The primary constraint I am embracing is to retain compatibility as
 far as possible with existing TiddlyWIki markup. I think that that
 rules out the wholesale adoption of a standard format - for instance,
 TiddlyWiki gets [[pretty|links]] the wrong way round from most wikis.

 To get around the limitations imposed by that constraint, we have the
 idea of pluggable parsers and renderers, so that it is possible to
 adopt other formats, and intermingle them and so on. If you can find a
 JavaScript parser for it, then hopefully you'll be able to use it.

 Markdown is a popular choice, lots of active development in the
 Pandocs project - their extensions may be a bit proprietary, but
 since the focus of the whole project is interoperability, it's for a
 good cause.

 Adopting MarkDown in its entirety is a bit troublesome from my
 perspective; it's not very formally defined, and the only
 implementations that I've seen are even hairier balls of regexps than
 the old TiddlyWIki wikifier. It also lacks what I'd have thought of as
 basic features, like tables, arguing that users should write HTML tags
 for them.

 Other candidates are txt2tags and reST/Sphinx, with the former having
 the edge in a huge number of output formats currently supported. Both
 of these are implemented in Python, while Pandocs is Haskell, if that
 means anything.

 I need JavaScript code, obviously. There may be bits and pieces worth
 taking from those projects, but a brief glance shows that they take in
 concerns that don't entirely match TiddlyWiki, so I don't see a way to
 wholesale adopt those syntaxes.

 IMO the key is to **not** pick and choose bits and pieces, but to take
 on an entire **syntax spec as a whole**.

 I only see that as feasible if there was a spec out there that was (a)
 compatible with TiddlyWiki and (b) did everything that TiddlyWiki
 needs and (c) didn't include lots of features that aren't relevant for
 TiddlyWiki and (d) had usable JavaScript code.

 This would enable plugging TW into a standardized toolchain so that it
 can be either a publishing and distribution target, along with say
 EPUB, AsciiDoc and HTMLhelp, or perhaps even the location where the
 master source text is edited, to then be able to output and
 transform to such formats. NB I consider TW's forte to be the former
 rather than the latter, but something like Pandocs would give the
 flexibility to go in either direction.

 As I say, the ability to have pluggable parsers and renderers should
 give you the capabilities you want. For you, the native TiddlyWiki
 format might just be what gets used for the application plumbing, with
 all your content being in other formats.

 But please **please** don't just throw another proprietary wikiMarkup
 syntax set into the mix, this is an historic opportunity to contribute
 to the idea of open data in the larger ecosystem rather than
 continuing to view tiddlers as an isolated silo needing custom coding
 to extract inline markup semantics.

 I'm not planning to throw another proprietary wiki markup into the
 mix. I'm planning to improve TiddlyWiki's existing markup so that it
 isn't broken with respect to paragraphs, and to introduce some
 alternative syntaxes for some simple formatting.

 Thanks in advance for at least considering these ideas. . .

 As I say, I think the kinds of things you're interested in are enabled
 by the parsing/rendering architecture. I would very much appreciate
 feedback on the improvements to the wikitext.

 Best wishes

 Jeremy

 /rant

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 TiddlyWiki group.
 To 

[tw] Re: Suggestion for better WARNING when you delete a tiddler that tags...

2011-12-15 Thread dickon
Nice.  Thanks Mans, that is really helpful.  i think those suggstions will 
solve this

Dickon

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TiddlyWiki group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/-/h6I37IL9OS0J.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.



[tw] New user can't register on Tiddlyspace

2011-12-15 Thread dickon
I am trying to help a couple of new (non technical) users to register on 
TiddlySpace, but we are struggling - type in username, type in passwords, 
click Create your space, and nothing happens!

What am I doing wrong?

dickon

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TiddlyWiki group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/-/1-TnvMZIMLUJ.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.



[tw] Re: New user can't register on Tiddlyspace

2011-12-15 Thread cdent
On Dec 15, 1:53 pm, dickon dickon.beving...@gmail.com wrote:
 I am trying to help a couple of new (non technical) users to register on
 TiddlySpace, but we are struggling - type in username, type in passwords,
 click Create your space, and nothing happens!

 What am I doing wrong?

Not your fault. When the backstage was updated some code was moved
from the tiddlyspace bag to the common bag, but the frontpage code was
not updated to reflect this change.

Now it has been.

Things should work now. Please shout it not.

Thanks for the report.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TiddlyWiki group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.



Re: Question | mGSD 3.1.8b -Exclude Sub-Projects from Active Projects

2011-12-15 Thread DDdW
ok, looked a bit into the code, and mGSD makes no apparent distinction 
between projects and subprojects, subprojects just get an extra tag in the 
form of the it's mother-project. No simple workaround this. You'd need to 
rename all project-tags into SubProject. And change the mGSD macro so that 
it will still show up in the mother projects. + a new button 'add 
Sub-Project' similar to the 'new dependent' button.'

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GTD 
TiddlyWiki group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/gtd-tiddlywiki/-/2TFsJRj3tokJ.
To post to this group, send email to gtd-tiddlyw...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
gtd-tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/gtd-tiddlywiki?hl=en.



Re: Question | mGSD 3.1.8b -Exclude Sub-Projects from Active Projects

2011-12-15 Thread Stefi Butler
Actually, you're in luck.  There's a filter clause that checks for the
existence of a parent project:

   where:tiddler.hasParent('Project')

or the lack of one:

   where:tiddler.!hasParent('Project')

If you change the Active Projects macro as follows, you should see only
projects that are not subprojects:

mgtdList title:'Active Projects' startTag:Project tags:'Active  !
Complete' view:ProjectArea mode:global
   newButtonTags:'Project Active'
   where:!tiddler.hasParent('Project')
   

-- 
Stephanie Butler

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GTD 
TiddlyWiki group.
To post to this group, send email to gtd-tiddlyw...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
gtd-tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/gtd-tiddlywiki?hl=en.



Re: Question | mGSD 3.1.8b -Exclude Sub-Projects from Active Projects

2011-12-15 Thread Stefi Butler
Argh.  I left out a bracket.  It should be:

mgtdList title:'Active Projects' startTag:Project tags:'Active  !
Complete' view:ProjectArea mode:global
   newButtonTags:'Project Active'
   where:!tiddler.hasParent('Project')
   

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Stefi Butler quarterd...@gmail.com wrote:

 Actually, you're in luck.  There's a filter clause that checks for the
 existence of a parent project:

where:tiddler.hasParent('Project')

 or the lack of one:

where:tiddler.!hasParent('Project')

 If you change the Active Projects macro as follows, you should see only
 projects that are not subprojects:

 mgtdList title:'Active Projects' startTag:Project tags:'Active  !
 Complete' view:ProjectArea mode:global
newButtonTags:'Project Active'
where:!tiddler.hasParent('Project')


 --
 Stephanie Butler




-- 
Stephanie Butler

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GTD 
TiddlyWiki group.
To post to this group, send email to gtd-tiddlyw...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
gtd-tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/gtd-tiddlywiki?hl=en.



[tw] Re: TiddlyWiki Development News

2011-12-15 Thread Julio
Hello all,

' hope everyone is having a good day.

Although much of this thread goes over my head, I am glad that Jeremy
is again working on Tiddliwiki. As a regular Joe, however, I would
like to state that if indeed one were to go with a syntax change I
would concur with Martin above. I would definitely be able to adapt to
the Creole syntax for the same reason he stated...it's very similar to
Tiddlywiki.

I do have a question:

* If indeed this were to be the case, can one adapt Creole yet keep
some syntax that would be unique to Tiddlywiki without the use of
plugins or converters?
* Or would that be too much work for development? Just trying to
educate myself here.

This probably should be discussion for another thread.
I thought I'd just throw the question out there while it's still fresh
in my mind.


Thanks all,

Julio


On Dec 15, 6:15 am, Martin Budden mjbud...@gmail.com wrote:
 I concur with HansBKK that you should adopt a standard wiki markup for
 TW 5. I differ from in that I think you should adopt WikiCreole see:

 http://www.wikicreole.org/wiki/Creole1.0
 andhttp://www.wikicreole.org/wiki/CreoleAdditions

 The main reason for this recommendation is the WikiCreole markup is
 *very* similar to TW markup. The main differences being the handling
 of bold, headings and links. WikiCreole even recommends using double
 angle brackets for plugins.

 Since TW 5 is going to break compatibility, then I think it should
 also take the opportunity to move to a standard wiki format. I know
 text compatibility and code compatibility are different things, but
 nevertheless I believe this is the correct way forward.

 Note TW 5 could support standard TW wikiformat using a plugin, and
 also could provide a converter so that people can easily move their
 text from TW format to WikiCreole format. Since the formats are so
 similar, conversion would be fairly straightforward.

 Martin

 On 15 December 2011 09:22, Jeremy Ruston jeremy.rus...@gmail.com wrote:







  I've been doing a lot of research and playing around in the tools
  that transform markup space recently, and would **implore** you to
  consider choosing one of the more mainstream cross-platform syntaxes
  rather than re-implementing a proprietary TWmarkup, even if it may be
  based on one of them.

  The primary constraint I am embracing is to retain compatibility as
  far as possible with existing TiddlyWIki markup. I think that that
  rules out the wholesale adoption of a standard format - for instance,
  TiddlyWiki gets [[pretty|links]] the wrong way round from most wikis.

  To get around the limitations imposed by that constraint, we have the
  idea of pluggable parsers and renderers, so that it is possible to
  adopt other formats, and intermingle them and so on. If you can find a
  JavaScript parser for it, then hopefully you'll be able to use it.

  Markdown is a popular choice, lots of active development in the
  Pandocs project - their extensions may be a bit proprietary, but
  since the focus of the whole project is interoperability, it's for a
  good cause.

  Adopting MarkDown in its entirety is a bit troublesome from my
  perspective; it's not very formally defined, and the only
  implementations that I've seen are even hairier balls of regexps than
  the old TiddlyWIki wikifier. It also lacks what I'd have thought of as
  basic features, like tables, arguing that users should write HTML tags
  for them.

  Other candidates are txt2tags and reST/Sphinx, with the former having
  the edge in a huge number of output formats currently supported. Both
  of these are implemented in Python, while Pandocs is Haskell, if that
  means anything.

  I need JavaScript code, obviously. There may be bits and pieces worth
  taking from those projects, but a brief glance shows that they take in
  concerns that don't entirely match TiddlyWiki, so I don't see a way to
  wholesale adopt those syntaxes.

  IMO the key is to **not** pick and choose bits and pieces, but to take
  on an entire **syntax spec as a whole**.

  I only see that as feasible if there was a spec out there that was (a)
  compatible with TiddlyWiki and (b) did everything that TiddlyWiki
  needs and (c) didn't include lots of features that aren't relevant for
  TiddlyWiki and (d) had usable JavaScript code.

  This would enable plugging TW into a standardized toolchain so that it
  can be either a publishing and distribution target, along with say
  EPUB, AsciiDoc and HTMLhelp, or perhaps even the location where the
  master source text is edited, to then be able to output and
  transform to such formats. NB I consider TW's forte to be the former
  rather than the latter, but something like Pandocs would give the
  flexibility to go in either direction.

  As I say, the ability to have pluggable parsers and renderers should
  give you the capabilities you want. For you, the native TiddlyWiki
  format might just be what gets used for the application plumbing, with
  all your content being 

[tw] Re: Hijacking saveTiddler

2011-12-15 Thread rakugo
I should also say take care when hijacking where you don't completely
know what you are doing. If you do it wrong you could break the
function. In this situation that means it would be impossible to save
any tiddlers... so take backups :)

On Dec 15, 1:47 am, skye riquelme riquelme.s...@gmail.com wrote:
 Ooopa..now thats exactly what I wanted to know. now to work to
 see if I can get it woring as I want.

 Thanks
 Skye

 On 14 dez, 08:18, rakugo jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:







  Hijack does seem to be the right word. The idea with hijacking is

  // cache the old value of the function
  var _cache = TiddlyWiki.prototype.saveTiddler;
  // override the existing value
  TiddlyWiki.prototype.saveTiddler =
  function(title,newTitle,newBody,modifier,modified,tags,fields,clearChangeCo 
  ­unt,created,creator)
  {
          // do something new
          alert(!);
          // apply the old value
          return _cache.apply(this, arguments);

  };

  Hope this helps...
  Jon

  On Dec 14, 4:00 am, skye riquelme riquelme.s...@gmail.com wrote:

   Hi All

   Not sure if Hijacking ids the right term in this case. Basically I
   want to modify the saveTiddler macro so that when a student saves a
   tiddler. the saveTiddler also does something else...in this case
   executes another macro that sends a message to my server..and
   maybe emails me a message. ths would be for specific
   tiddlers...not ALL!

   So how to hijack the saveTiddler macro to my ends...where is it
   in the core?

   Thanks
   Skye

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TiddlyWiki group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.



[tw] Re: New user can't register on Tiddlyspace

2011-12-15 Thread dickon
Brilliant.  Thanks Chris.  momentary panic as tomorrow I have a whole room 
full of therapists (known for their munificent patience with the glitches 
and crashes that occur in the interpersonal sphere, but not for the same in 
their relation to IT) to train about TiddlySpace in relation to the slowly 
crescendoing AMBIT project (see @tiddlymanuals and @ambit)... this will now 
be OK!

PS keep an eye out for Jon Lister and Josh Bradley's ambit theme v3 which 
will be unleashed very soon - tiddlywiki in excelsis.

Dickon

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TiddlyWiki group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/-/mnq_LLvjX4YJ.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.



[tw] Re: Hijacking saveTiddler

2011-12-15 Thread skye riquelme
...thanks even more so for the advice...obviously Ill play around with
a simple non-importante test TW first!!!

and thanks for the warning/advice

Skye

On 15 dez, 12:36, rakugo jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
 I should also say take care when hijacking where you don't completely
 know what you are doing. If you do it wrong you could break the
 function. In this situation that means it would be impossible to save
 any tiddlers... so take backups :)

 On Dec 15, 1:47 am, skye riquelme riquelme.s...@gmail.com wrote:







  Ooopa..now thats exactly what I wanted to know. now to work to
  see if I can get it woring as I want.

  Thanks
  Skye

  On 14 dez, 08:18, rakugo jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:

   Hijack does seem to be the right word. The idea with hijacking is

   // cache the old value of the function
   var _cache = TiddlyWiki.prototype.saveTiddler;
   // override the existing value
   TiddlyWiki.prototype.saveTiddler =
   function(title,newTitle,newBody,modifier,modified,tags,fields,clearChangeCo
­unt,created,creator)
   {
           // do something new
           alert(!);
           // apply the old value
           return _cache.apply(this, arguments);

   };

   Hope this helps...
   Jon

   On Dec 14, 4:00 am, skye riquelme riquelme.s...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi All

Not sure if Hijacking ids the right term in this case. Basically I
want to modify the saveTiddler macro so that when a student saves a
tiddler. the saveTiddler also does something else...in this case
executes another macro that sends a message to my server..and
maybe emails me a message. ths would be for specific
tiddlers...not ALL!

So how to hijack the saveTiddler macro to my ends...where is it
in the core?

Thanks
Skye

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TiddlyWiki group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.



[tw] Re: New user can't register on Tiddlyspace

2011-12-15 Thread cdent
On Dec 15, 3:29 pm, dickon dickon.beving...@gmail.com wrote:
 Brilliant.  Thanks Chris.  momentary panic as tomorrow I have a whole room
 full of therapists (known for their munificent patience with the glitches
 and crashes that occur in the interpersonal sphere, but not for the same in
 their relation to IT) to train about TiddlySpace in relation to the slowly
 crescendoing AMBIT project (see @tiddlymanuals and @ambit)... this will now
 be OK!

Yay! I assume you are aware of the forthcoming downtime for
tiddlyspace.com[1]? This is looking like it will be Wednesday
afternoon.

 PS keep an eye out for Jon Lister and Josh Bradley's ambit theme v3 which
 will be unleashed very soon - tiddlywiki in excelsis.

Yeah, I've been watching that evolve. Very snazzy looking stuff. I'm
hoping to be able to benefit from some of their skillz soon.

[1] 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlyspace/browse_frm/thread/be3d22d0073185c8

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TiddlyWiki group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.



[tw] Re: TiddlyWiki Development News

2011-12-15 Thread PMario
Hi folks,

I did re/search a bit for nicely documented wikitext grammers lately.
I only found one for wiki creole. The good thing is, that it imo is a
good subset of the TW grammar.

There is a short article from:
 Authors: Martin Junghans, Dirk Riehle, Rama Gurram, Matthias Kaiser, Mário 
 Lopes, Umit Yalcinalp
at: http://dirkriehle.com/2008/07/19/a-grammar-for-standardized-wiki-markup/

that links to: (see available as a PDF file)
http://dirkriehle.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/ws2008-wiki-creole-grammar-final-for-web.pdf

which talks about there intentions.
=

Searching Dirk Riehle's site a bit more I found:
http://dirkriehle.com/publications/2008-2/wiki-creole/
and
http://dirkriehle.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/creole10_with_extension.g

Which is a full EBNF grammar description for wiki Creole. (using some
ANTLR specific commands).

Since the source (see: creole10_with_extension.g link) is copyrighted,
I did contact Mr. Riehle to get a less restrictive license (just to be
sure). Since the creole project is CreativeCommons, I did get an
emailed permission to use the most open CC-BY - 
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
license to use with TW.

@Jeremy
Just linking some resources, that may be usefull.

-m

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TiddlyWiki group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.



[tw] Date confusion

2011-12-15 Thread skye riquelme
Hi All

A quick question to resolve some confusion about date formats.

If I use Erics QuickNotePlugin like this - quickNote tiddler:Skye-
dateformat:0MM0DD-0hh:0mm:0ss taglist:Nota..the note is
created with the title in the format specified...as you would expect
from Eric's work!!!

Now when I use almost the same date format in a very similar bit of
coding part of a similar input form, like -
input type=button value=submit onclick=
this.form.materia.value=config.options.txtMateria;
this.form.topico.value=config.options.txtTopico;
this.form.subtopico.value=config.options.txtSubTopico;
this.form.nota.value=config.options.txtNota;
var text=this.form.comment.value;
var when=new Date().formatString('0MM0DD-0hh:0mm:0ss');
this.form.when.value=when;
var who=config.options.txtUserName;
this.form.who.value=who;
var title=who+'-'+when;
this.form.title.value=title;
var etiquetas='comment '+who;
store.saveTiddler(title,title,text,who,when,etiquetas,null);
autoSave();
story.displayTiddler(null,title);


the tiddler is not created, and in fact the TW freezes up with a
message saying it cant save the tiddler because -
Erro ao guardar tiddler 'Skye-20111215-16:47:03':
TypeError: b.convertToMMDDHHMM is not a function

Why is this happeningwhy doesnt my date format work in my code??

I´d rather use my code (than Erics) as I plan to have it send the
comment to a MySQL database and generate a message by email.blah.
blah and would rather not mess around too much with Erics work
(mainly cause I´d most likely just break it!)

Thanks
Skye

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TiddlyWiki group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.



[tw] Re: Date confusion

2011-12-15 Thread Eric Shulman
 var when=new Date().formatString('0MM0DD-0hh:0mm:0ss');
...
 store.saveTiddler(title,title,text,who,when,etiquetas,null);
...
 TypeError: b.convertToMMDDHHMM is not a function
 Why is this happeningwhy doesnt my date format work in my code??

The 'when' variable you define is a date, **formatted as text**.  But
the saveTiddler() function expects a Date **object**.  Try these
changes:


var now=new Date()
var when=now.formatString('0MM0DD-0hh:0mm:0ss');
...
store.saveTiddler(title,title,text,who,now,etiquetas,null);


enjoy,
-e
Eric Shulman
TiddlyTools / ELS Design Studios


TiddlyTools needs YOUR financial support...
Help ME to continue to help YOU...
make a generous donation today:
   http://www.TiddlyTools.com/#Donations

Professional TiddlyWiki Consulting Services...
Analysis, Design, and Custom Solutions:
   http://www.TiddlyTools.com/#Contact

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TiddlyWiki group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.



[tw] Re: New user can't register on Tiddlyspace

2011-12-15 Thread dickon
Thanks for pointing out the downtime - I hadn't reaised that, and will warn 
the new users.

From tomorrow there will be 17 separate use instances (locally-adapted 
versions) of the @ambit tiddlymanual in teams across the UK - not bad.  
Have some chapters in books and a paper coming out next year, too, so 
things are looking good.  What I'd really like is for a surgeon or a 
midwife, or a district nurse to have a look and say I wanna bit of that!

Best wishes and Happy Christmas,

Dickon

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TiddlyWiki group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/-/FQ_CpA7Ndj0J.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.



[tw] Re: Date confusion

2011-12-15 Thread skye riquelme
Thanks...that works, although not sure why. I can see that var now is
a dateas store.saveTiddler expects..but why is var now
formatted into the right format, when the code formated var now as var
when. seems to me the formated date is in when,not now!!!

Anyway, back on the road...now just have to get it to write the note
to mysqland then later have php build the sorted notes into a
text, stored into pureStore format Phew!!!

Thanks
Skye


On 15 dez, 17:12, Eric Shulman elsdes...@gmail.com wrote:
  var when=new Date().formatString('0MM0DD-0hh:0mm:0ss');
 ...
  store.saveTiddler(title,title,text,who,when,etiquetas,null);
 ...
  TypeError: b.convertToMMDDHHMM is not a function
  Why is this happeningwhy doesnt my date format work in my code??

 The 'when' variable you define is a date, **formatted as text**.  But
 the saveTiddler() function expects a Date **object**.  Try these
 changes:

 
 var now=new Date()
 var when=now.formatString('0MM0DD-0hh:0mm:0ss');
 ...
 store.saveTiddler(title,title,text,who,now,etiquetas,null);
 

 enjoy,
 -e
 Eric Shulman
 TiddlyTools / ELS Design Studios

 
 TiddlyTools needs YOUR financial support...
 Help ME to continue to help YOU...
 make a generous donation today:
    http://www.TiddlyTools.com/#Donations

 Professional TiddlyWiki Consulting Services...
 Analysis, Design, and Custom Solutions:
    http://www.TiddlyTools.com/#Contact

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TiddlyWiki group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.



[tw] Not all tabs showing up in backstage

2011-12-15 Thread Krieseg
I am familiar with tiddlyspot, but I have just started testing
tiddlyspace. Currently, when I go to backstage, I get the following
tabs:
search
tiddlers
plugins
batch
tweaks
import/export

I think I'm missing a few, such as members and include.

Can anyone offer advice as to why these are missing?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TiddlyWiki group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.