[tw5] Re: sort:version:reverse?

2024-04-17 Thread PMario 
I did create an GH issue: 
https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/8153

On Wednesday, April 17, 2024 at 8:33:00 AM UTC+2 PMario wrote:

> I'm not 100% sure yet, but there seems to be a bug. I'll have a closer 
> look. 
> A fast look to the code suggests, that the documentation is right. 
> But I can confirm, that *it does not work* as intended with my test 
> tiddlers. 
> -m
>
> On Wednesday, April 17, 2024 at 1:39:12 AM UTC+2 springer wrote:
>
>> Interesting! The documentation DOES imply that you can tuck :reverse into 
>> the very place where you had it!
>>
>> Perhaps this is just an error in documentation? In fact it works fine if 
>> it comes *before* the sort-type parameter:
>>
>> `{{{ [has[version]] :sort:reverse:version[get[version]] }}}`
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7:31:00 PM UTC-4 Cade Roux wrote:
>>
>>> I see, I can use that separate reverse operator instead of doing it in 
>>> the initial sort.
>>>
>>> I'm still not sure how to use the reverse documented here in the 
>>> flaglist in the :sort filter run prefix:
>>>
>>> https://tiddlywiki.com/#Sort%20Filter%20Run%20Prefix
>>>
>>> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 182937.png]
>>>
>>> I'll post any future questions in the other forums.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Cade
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 6:01:18 PM UTC-5 springer wrote:
>>>
 Of course, I meant "come on over *from* google groups, and join us at 
 talk.tiddlywiki.org"

 On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 6:59:58 PM UTC-4 springer wrote:

> Hello Cade! As you might note with other posts at google groups, the 
> community for this discussion has migrated to talk.tiddlywiki.org.
>
> Although we (at that forum) can still *see* posts from the google 
> group, we can't reply easily to them. 
>
> So please come on over to google groups.
>
> Meanwhile, I can suggest that the documentation on the reverse 
> Operator  shows 
> that it doesn't take a parameter, nor does it work as a parameter within 
> the sort filter run prefix; instead it works at the "caboose" end of any 
> filter to flip the list order. Something like this works at 
> Tiddlywiki.com:
>
> `{{{ [has[version]] :sort:version[get[version]] +[reverse[]] }}}`
>
> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 12:29:33 PM UTC-4 Cade Roux wrote:
>
>> I have change logs with a field for version information, and I am 
>> trying to sort them in reverse order and it doesn't appear to be 
>> working.  
>> The change log tiddlers themselves are also lists, but I cleared all 
>> that 
>> out and loaded these into the latest TW version to make a minimal 
>> reproducible case.  If I take out the sort entirely, the 10.0 comes to 
>> the 
>> top as you would expect for them to be sorted by title.  But the sort 
>> either with or without :reverse is the same.
>> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 112417.png]
>> <$list filter="[ascend.change[index]] 
>> :sort:version:reverse[get[ascend.version]]"><$link to={{!!title}} 
>> /><$transclude/>
>>
>> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 112528.png]
>> What am I doing wrong?
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/efc4cd64-a2d8-4cac-9788-3c1fcca51f9cn%40googlegroups.com.

[tw5] Re: sort:version:reverse?

2024-04-17 Thread PMario 
I'm not 100% sure yet, but there seems to be a bug. I'll have a closer 
look. 
A fast look to the code suggests, that the documentation is right. 
But I can confirm, that *it does not work* as intended with my test 
tiddlers. 
-m

On Wednesday, April 17, 2024 at 1:39:12 AM UTC+2 springer wrote:

> Interesting! The documentation DOES imply that you can tuck :reverse into 
> the very place where you had it!
>
> Perhaps this is just an error in documentation? In fact it works fine if 
> it comes *before* the sort-type parameter:
>
> `{{{ [has[version]] :sort:reverse:version[get[version]] }}}`
>
> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7:31:00 PM UTC-4 Cade Roux wrote:
>
>> I see, I can use that separate reverse operator instead of doing it in 
>> the initial sort.
>>
>> I'm still not sure how to use the reverse documented here in the flaglist 
>> in the :sort filter run prefix:
>>
>> https://tiddlywiki.com/#Sort%20Filter%20Run%20Prefix
>>
>> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 182937.png]
>>
>> I'll post any future questions in the other forums.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Cade
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 6:01:18 PM UTC-5 springer wrote:
>>
>>> Of course, I meant "come on over *from* google groups, and join us at 
>>> talk.tiddlywiki.org"
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 6:59:58 PM UTC-4 springer wrote:
>>>
 Hello Cade! As you might note with other posts at google groups, the 
 community for this discussion has migrated to talk.tiddlywiki.org.

 Although we (at that forum) can still *see* posts from the google 
 group, we can't reply easily to them. 

 So please come on over to google groups.

 Meanwhile, I can suggest that the documentation on the reverse Operator 
  shows that 
 it doesn't take a parameter, nor does it work as a parameter within the 
 sort filter run prefix; instead it works at the "caboose" end of any 
 filter 
 to flip the list order. Something like this works at Tiddlywiki.com:

 `{{{ [has[version]] :sort:version[get[version]] +[reverse[]] }}}`

 On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 12:29:33 PM UTC-4 Cade Roux wrote:

> I have change logs with a field for version information, and I am 
> trying to sort them in reverse order and it doesn't appear to be working. 
>  
> The change log tiddlers themselves are also lists, but I cleared all that 
> out and loaded these into the latest TW version to make a minimal 
> reproducible case.  If I take out the sort entirely, the 10.0 comes to 
> the 
> top as you would expect for them to be sorted by title.  But the sort 
> either with or without :reverse is the same.
> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 112417.png]
> <$list filter="[ascend.change[index]] 
> :sort:version:reverse[get[ascend.version]]"><$link to={{!!title}} 
> /><$transclude/>
>
> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 112528.png]
> What am I doing wrong?
>


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/94c1b8d1-b624-4e79-8801-d9d37a65862an%40googlegroups.com.

[tw5] Re: sort:version:reverse?

2024-04-16 Thread springer 
Interesting! The documentation DOES imply that you can tuck :reverse into 
the very place where you had it!

Perhaps this is just an error in documentation? In fact it works fine if it 
comes *before* the sort-type parameter:

`{{{ [has[version]] :sort:reverse:version[get[version]] }}}`

On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7:31:00 PM UTC-4 Cade Roux wrote:

> I see, I can use that separate reverse operator instead of doing it in the 
> initial sort.
>
> I'm still not sure how to use the reverse documented here in the flaglist 
> in the :sort filter run prefix:
>
> https://tiddlywiki.com/#Sort%20Filter%20Run%20Prefix
>
> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 182937.png]
>
> I'll post any future questions in the other forums.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Cade
>
> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 6:01:18 PM UTC-5 springer wrote:
>
>> Of course, I meant "come on over *from* google groups, and join us at 
>> talk.tiddlywiki.org"
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 6:59:58 PM UTC-4 springer wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Cade! As you might note with other posts at google groups, the 
>>> community for this discussion has migrated to talk.tiddlywiki.org.
>>>
>>> Although we (at that forum) can still *see* posts from the google group, 
>>> we can't reply easily to them. 
>>>
>>> So please come on over to google groups.
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, I can suggest that the documentation on the reverse Operator 
>>>  shows that it 
>>> doesn't take a parameter, nor does it work as a parameter within the sort 
>>> filter run prefix; instead it works at the "caboose" end of any filter to 
>>> flip the list order. Something like this works at Tiddlywiki.com:
>>>
>>> `{{{ [has[version]] :sort:version[get[version]] +[reverse[]] }}}`
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 12:29:33 PM UTC-4 Cade Roux wrote:
>>>
 I have change logs with a field for version information, and I am 
 trying to sort them in reverse order and it doesn't appear to be working.  
 The change log tiddlers themselves are also lists, but I cleared all that 
 out and loaded these into the latest TW version to make a minimal 
 reproducible case.  If I take out the sort entirely, the 10.0 comes to the 
 top as you would expect for them to be sorted by title.  But the sort 
 either with or without :reverse is the same.
 [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 112417.png]
 <$list filter="[ascend.change[index]] 
 :sort:version:reverse[get[ascend.version]]"><$link to={{!!title}} 
 /><$transclude/>

 [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 112528.png]
 What am I doing wrong?

>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ea64f566-1e53-4bf3-89f0-8507e96c9124n%40googlegroups.com.

[tw5] Re: sort:version:reverse?

2024-04-16 Thread Cade Roux 
I see, I can use that separate reverse operator instead of doing it in the 
initial sort.

I'm still not sure how to use the reverse documented here in the flaglist 
in the :sort filter run prefix:

https://tiddlywiki.com/#Sort%20Filter%20Run%20Prefix

[image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 182937.png]

I'll post any future questions in the other forums.

Thanks,

Cade

On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 6:01:18 PM UTC-5 springer wrote:

> Of course, I meant "come on over *from* google groups, and join us at 
> talk.tiddlywiki.org"
>
> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 6:59:58 PM UTC-4 springer wrote:
>
>> Hello Cade! As you might note with other posts at google groups, the 
>> community for this discussion has migrated to talk.tiddlywiki.org.
>>
>> Although we (at that forum) can still *see* posts from the google group, 
>> we can't reply easily to them. 
>>
>> So please come on over to google groups.
>>
>> Meanwhile, I can suggest that the documentation on the reverse Operator 
>>  shows that it 
>> doesn't take a parameter, nor does it work as a parameter within the sort 
>> filter run prefix; instead it works at the "caboose" end of any filter to 
>> flip the list order. Something like this works at Tiddlywiki.com:
>>
>> `{{{ [has[version]] :sort:version[get[version]] +[reverse[]] }}}`
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 12:29:33 PM UTC-4 Cade Roux wrote:
>>
>>> I have change logs with a field for version information, and I am trying 
>>> to sort them in reverse order and it doesn't appear to be working.  The 
>>> change log tiddlers themselves are also lists, but I cleared all that out 
>>> and loaded these into the latest TW version to make a minimal reproducible 
>>> case.  If I take out the sort entirely, the 10.0 comes to the top as you 
>>> would expect for them to be sorted by title.  But the sort either with or 
>>> without :reverse is the same.
>>> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 112417.png]
>>> <$list filter="[ascend.change[index]] 
>>> :sort:version:reverse[get[ascend.version]]"><$link to={{!!title}} 
>>> /><$transclude/>
>>>
>>> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 112528.png]
>>> What am I doing wrong?
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/5a4726e2-b175-477a-ba4d-eed137d76414n%40googlegroups.com.

[tw5] Re: sort:version:reverse?

2024-04-16 Thread springer 
Of course, I meant "come on over *from* google groups, and join us at 
talk.tiddlywiki.org"

On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 6:59:58 PM UTC-4 springer wrote:

> Hello Cade! As you might note with other posts at google groups, the 
> community for this discussion has migrated to talk.tiddlywiki.org.
>
> Although we (at that forum) can still *see* posts from the google group, 
> we can't reply easily to them. 
>
> So please come on over to google groups.
>
> Meanwhile, I can suggest that the documentation on the reverse Operator 
>  shows that it 
> doesn't take a parameter, nor does it work as a parameter within the sort 
> filter run prefix; instead it works at the "caboose" end of any filter to 
> flip the list order. Something like this works at Tiddlywiki.com:
>
> `{{{ [has[version]] :sort:version[get[version]] +[reverse[]] }}}`
>
> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 12:29:33 PM UTC-4 Cade Roux wrote:
>
>> I have change logs with a field for version information, and I am trying 
>> to sort them in reverse order and it doesn't appear to be working.  The 
>> change log tiddlers themselves are also lists, but I cleared all that out 
>> and loaded these into the latest TW version to make a minimal reproducible 
>> case.  If I take out the sort entirely, the 10.0 comes to the top as you 
>> would expect for them to be sorted by title.  But the sort either with or 
>> without :reverse is the same.
>> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 112417.png]
>> <$list filter="[ascend.change[index]] 
>> :sort:version:reverse[get[ascend.version]]"><$link to={{!!title}} 
>> /><$transclude/>
>>
>> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 112528.png]
>> What am I doing wrong?
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/5c8066ba-dd73-4b90-891b-2e7507b8fb07n%40googlegroups.com.

[tw5] Re: sort:version:reverse?

2024-04-16 Thread springer 
Hello Cade! As you might note with other posts at google groups, the 
community for this discussion has migrated to talk.tiddlywiki.org.

Although we (at that forum) can still *see* posts from the google group, we 
can't reply easily to them. 

So please come on over to google groups.

Meanwhile, I can suggest that the documentation on the reverse Operator 
 shows that it 
doesn't take a parameter, nor does it work as a parameter within the sort 
filter run prefix; instead it works at the "caboose" end of any filter to 
flip the list order. Something like this works at Tiddlywiki.com:

`{{{ [has[version]] :sort:version[get[version]] +[reverse[]] }}}`

On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 12:29:33 PM UTC-4 Cade Roux wrote:

> I have change logs with a field for version information, and I am trying 
> to sort them in reverse order and it doesn't appear to be working.  The 
> change log tiddlers themselves are also lists, but I cleared all that out 
> and loaded these into the latest TW version to make a minimal reproducible 
> case.  If I take out the sort entirely, the 10.0 comes to the top as you 
> would expect for them to be sorted by title.  But the sort either with or 
> without :reverse is the same.
> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 112417.png]
> <$list filter="[ascend.change[index]] 
> :sort:version:reverse[get[ascend.version]]"><$link to={{!!title}} 
> /><$transclude/>
>
> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 112528.png]
> What am I doing wrong?
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/4041299d-4c5e-4e77-a849-9f337b0b3a32n%40googlegroups.com.