Re: [time-nuts] Updated Shera controller

2010-07-29 Thread Bruce Griffiths
You can't predict the settling time of an opamp from its slew rate or 
its gain-bandwidth product.

The TS272 datasheet has no settling time spec whatsoever.
In this case, since there is no spec it needs to be measured.
Opamps with 2 or more cascaded gain stages like these are notorious for 
poor settling times.

10us is merely guesswork.
The settling time could well be much longer and it may depend on the 
input signal level.


Bruce



Richard H McCorkle wrote:

FYI,
The TS272/TS274 have a slew rate of 5.5v/us at unity gain, the max
voltage on the cap is 2.7v in the new design, and the voltage is read
  10us after sample complete, so the buffer should have time to
stabilize after the sample before being read.

Richard


Bruce wrote:
   

Not really its both overkill as it doesnt timestamp, it only measures a
time interval and underkill in that theres no DAC.
There are also some concerns about the settling time of the TAC buffer
opamp which isnt strictly necessary for the lower resolution required in
this application.
PPS timestamping only needs a single TAC.

Bruce



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

 



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

   




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Updated Shera controller

2010-07-29 Thread Ulrich Bangert
 Uhm, isn't this exactly where you want to use the 
 still-smelling-like-brand-new-car PICTIC II with a good DAC 
 and a microcontroller ?

I guess the PICTIC II is not very good when stop pulses arrive BEFORE start
pulses which is a normal condition if a average time interval of zero
between local pps and GPS pps is the aim.

Ulrich Bangert

 -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
 Von: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com 
 [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] Im Auftrag von Poul-Henning Kamp
 Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Juli 2010 22:47
 An: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Betreff: Re: [time-nuts] Updated Shera controller
 
 
 In message 4c5092fa.2030...@xtra.co.nz, Bruce Griffiths writes:
 
 Instead of copying the Shera controller albeit with higher resolution
 its probably more cost effective to choose a microprocessor 
 with built 
 in time stamping capability.
 
 Uhm, isn't this exactly where you want to use the 
 still-smelling-like-brand-new-car PICTIC II with a good DAC 
 and a microcontroller ?
 
 -- 
 Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
 FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
 Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by 
 incompetence.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Updated Shera controller

2010-07-29 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 60eb5e7c69594f49b830463dc322e...@athlon, Ulrich Bangert writes:
 Uhm, isn't this exactly where you want to use the 
 still-smelling-like-brand-new-car PICTIC II with a good DAC 
 and a microcontroller ?

I guess the PICTIC II is not very good when stop pulses arrive BEFORE start
pulses which is a normal condition if a average time interval of zero
between local pps and GPS pps is the aim.

So configure it to use a standard offset of one Xtal/Rb period ?


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Message for John Allen K1AE re 74AC175PC

2010-07-29 Thread GandalfG8
Hi John
 
Apologies to you and all for writing via the list but I've had no response  
to direct emails so not sure if they're being dumped by a spam filter or  
whatever.
 
You expressed interest in two off 74AC175PC ICs and I would be grateful if  
you could contact me again please to confirm whether or not you still 
require  them.
 
If not it's no problem but all others requested have now been  shipped and 
I didn't want to offer yours to anyone else without checking  with you first.
 
regards
 
Nigel
GM8PZR
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Regarding the option 040...

2010-07-29 Thread Douglas Wire - PUPCo Studios
That was what naturally came to my mind too as all of the scads of HP stuff
I have here and use daily is a lot older and 040's were just that, the
HP-IB, now GPIB port board. I sent him an email suggesting it might just be
the Universal option for the I/O of the system as with my 5328A's they are
the only thing that the 040 is something other than the com port. Just food
for thought and I hope I have not made things worse for him or am confusing
anything. Now I am curious too as the data is not readily had on the net and
you posted from a 19 series, his was a 5335A wasn't it???

 

Warm regards,

Douglas M. Wire, GED, FNA,

PUPCo Studios  PUPCo Research Group

 mailto:cont...@pupcostudios.com cont...@pupcostudios.com

Description: PUPCo_outlook_2010_sig_1

 

image003.jpg___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

[time-nuts] DELET POST MISREAD YOUR DATA!

2010-07-29 Thread Douglas Wire - PUPCo Studios
1993 catalog. Doh. Wish I could recall that and now I have polluted the
list! Sorry everyone.

 

Warm regards,

Douglas M. Wire, GED, FNA,

PUPCo Studios  PUPCo Research Group

 mailto:cont...@pupcostudios.com cont...@pupcostudios.com

Description: PUPCo_outlook_2010_sig_1

 

image003.jpg___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

[time-nuts] Error correction and test G

2010-07-29 Thread Douglas Wire - PUPCo Studios
Even worse for some reason the list got my errant thinking backward, the
HP-IP/GBIP port and MB are correct!

(Re-posting for error correction and in plain-text as I have no idea why the
board picked up that giant string in the domain's email address, for future
reference...)

Warm regards,
Douglas M. Wire, GED, FNA,
PUPCo Studios  PUPCo Research Group
cont...@pupcostudios.com





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Updated Shera controller

2010-07-29 Thread EWKehren
Hi
I think it would be nice to have a show of hands as to how many are locking 
 a Rb to GPS and what they  use. 
Bert Kehren
 
 
In a message dated 7/29/2010 4:00:31 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
p...@phk.freebsd.dk writes:

In  message 60eb5e7c69594f49b830463dc322e...@athlon, Ulrich Bangert  
writes:
 Uhm, isn't this exactly where you want to use the  
 still-smelling-like-brand-new-car PICTIC II with a good DAC  
 and a microcontroller ?

I guess the PICTIC II is  not very good when stop pulses arrive BEFORE 
start
pulses which is a  normal condition if a average time interval of zero
between local pps  and GPS pps is the aim.

So configure it to use a standard offset of one  Xtal/Rb period ?


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp| UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org   | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice  what can adequately be explained by  
incompetence.

___
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Updated Shera controller

2010-07-29 Thread Arnold Tibus
I do, and I am also interested on other improvements!

Regards,
Arnold


Am 29.07.2010 12:49, schrieb ewkeh...@aol.com:
 Hi
 I think it would be nice to have a show of hands as to how many are locking 
  a Rb to GPS and what they  use. 
 Bert Kehren
  
  
 In a message dated 7/29/2010 4:00:31 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
 p...@phk.freebsd.dk writes:
 
 In  message 60eb5e7c69594f49b830463dc322e...@athlon, Ulrich Bangert  
 writes:
 Uhm, isn't this exactly where you want to use the  
 still-smelling-like-brand-new-car PICTIC II with a good DAC  
 and a microcontroller ?

 I guess the PICTIC II is  not very good when stop pulses arrive BEFORE 
 start
 pulses which is a  normal condition if a average time interval of zero
 between local pps  and GPS pps is the aim.
 
 So configure it to use a standard offset of one  Xtal/Rb period ?
 
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Updated Shera controller

2010-07-29 Thread Javier Herrero

Hello,

El 29/07/2010 07:48, Hal Murray escribió:


I'm not familiar with windows.  I think PIC and AVR come with free software
for windows which works well with their low cost development platforms.  The
compiler may be crippled to get you to buy the real version from somebody,
but I'm pretty sure it's good enough to get well off the ground.

I'm not familiar with what's available from the vendors for ARM.


gcc has good support for PIC, AVR, and ARM.  There may be better, but it's
well past good enough.  (It runs on windows if you use cygwin.)

Atmel provides free of charge a nice windows tool for the AVR, 
http://www.atmel.com/dyn/products/tools_card.asp?tool_id=2725


This integrates the GCC compiler and a quite nice development 
environment (it has been a while since last time I used it), and it is 
not a crippled commercial tool version. There is also no need to run 
cygwin to use this tool.


For the PIC I'm not aware of anything similar. I used time ago the IAR 
tools, but they are both really expensive and really not so good. 
Anyway, I don't like PICs


For ARM there is also windows-based GCC tools set, that can be 
integrated in Eclipse environment. You can get it at 
http://www.yagarto.de . I find ARM7 derivatives (AT91SAM7X or AT91SAM7S 
from Atmel, but there are a lot from several manufacturers) very nice, 
fast and unexpensive 32-bit microcontrollers, adequate for those 
applications where an AVR could be limited, but where there is no need 
to use a big embedded OS. They are also plenty of integrated peripherals.





Or perhaps you need an OS.  If you depend on a commercial OS, somebody would
have to buy a license.  Linux is free and runs on ARM.  NetBSD runs on ARM.
I'm not sure about the other BSD variants.  That's 1/2 :)  I expect most of
the code we would be interested in would be low level, just collect the data
and pass it off to a PC to do the number crunching, display, and archiving.
As such it doesn't need an OS.



An embedded linux project can be very fun, but it is quite complex. If 
you need the OS, you first need the bootloader (U-boot or similar), and 
you must make it work with your hardware. Then the kernel, with the 
drivers for your hardware (there are a lot of them in the linux 
distributions, but some may require some tuning for your hardware, and 
also you can be in the need to write your own drivers for those 
peripherals that are currently not supported). And finaly, the user 
space application(s). Lots of fun, I can guarantee it :)


Best regards,

Javier

--

Javier HerreroEMAIL: jherr...@hvsistemas.com
HV Sistemas S.L.  PHONE: +34 949 336 806
Los Charcones, 17 FAX:   +34 949 336 792
19170 El Casar - Guadalajara - Spain  WEB: http://www.hvsistemas.com


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Updated Shera controller

2010-07-29 Thread EWKehren
Arnold
 what do you use?  Bert Kehren
 
 
In a message dated 7/29/2010 7:02:06 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
arnold.ti...@gmx.de writes:

I do,  and I am also interested on other  improvements!

Regards,
Arnold


Am 29.07.2010 12:49,  schrieb ewkeh...@aol.com:
 Hi
 I think it would be nice to have  a show of hands as to how many are 
locking 
  a Rb to GPS and what  they  use. 
 Bert Kehren
  
  
 In  a message dated 7/29/2010 4:00:31 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
  p...@phk.freebsd.dk writes:
 
 In  message  60eb5e7c69594f49b830463dc322e...@athlon, Ulrich Bangert  
 
 writes:
 Uhm, isn't this exactly where you want to use  the  
 still-smelling-like-brand-new-car PICTIC II with a  good DAC  
 and a microcontroller  ?

 I guess the PICTIC II is  not very good when  stop pulses arrive BEFORE 
 start
 pulses which is a   normal condition if a average time interval of zero
 between local  pps  and GPS pps is the aim.
 
 So configure it to use a  standard offset of one  Xtal/Rb period ?
 
  


___
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] What do you use?

2010-07-29 Thread Douglas Wire - PUPCo Studios
I am working with an older Motorola M12M here to develop a new system for
specialized industrial application. Simply using it for the dev. work and
such and will finish off project with the new much better SM product and the
plan is to go FPGA for the thinking. Biggest issue and have never posted
about it is that while the task here is only to essentially end up with what
will need be known freq's in particular bands with NIST type accuracy to
drive the project, the big difficulty is NOT using an oscillator like any of
my ovens. Lots of ways to go, but nothing readily seems tight enough to
not make the entire affair a massive hassle to get to accuracy. Simple would
be have a darn time base that has some accuracy - that spoils the cost.
Maybe I should install a metronome??? Yeah not yet found any cheap
alternative that looks suitable to go from.

 

Guess that was not what you asked either. Old M12M here.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Updated Shera controller

2010-07-29 Thread Stanley Reynolds




- Original Message 
From: Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thu, July 29, 2010 12:48:55 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Updated Shera controller


stanley_reyno...@yahoo.com said:
 Full circle back to the software, the number of units sold, the cost per
 hour and time to complete project would determine the software cost. Would
 not  surprise me if the software would be the biggest expense till you break
 the 1000  unit mark unless the cost per hour was very low. As a hardware guy
 at heart it  is hard for me to assign a cost/value to software ;-) 

That line of thinking is probably appropriate for a commercial project.

For a hobby/volunteer project, software can be free.  Consider Lady Heather 
as an example.

In this context, there are two types of software.  There is the software you 
run on the board you build.  There is also the software you use to develop 
the software you run.

I'm assuming a volunteer would write the software just like volunteers have 
designed boards.



snip

Some with well stocked junk boxes could argue the hardware was below market 
cost 
as well. But my point was the software was much more of a factor than the 
hardware if we assign value to each part. Yes Lady Heather is free to many but 
not all, the author and others would be rich if paid a fair price for their 
work. Thank you time-nuts for your time.

Stanley

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] FS: 5370A

2010-07-29 Thread paul swed
Interesting you were going to add a fan.
I have 4 5370s and measured the temps on that heat sink.
They were all the same pretty much, so figured HP knew what they were doing.
But it really does feel pretty hot.
Pretty sure what I have picked them up for is not what you paid. Plus they
are heavy.
Good luck with finding a new home. They are a nice counter.

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Joseph Gray jg...@zianet.com wrote:

 Ok guys, it has been sitting on my floor far too long and I don't know
 when I'll get around to working on it. When I last messed with it, I
 went through quite a few of the performance tests and IIRC, most
 passed. It measures frequency ok, but it's off a bit on TI
 measurements. I intended to open it up and get things up to spec, but
 never finished. It does have one intermittant BNC on the front panel
 that I haven't re-soldered yet.

 I'm not sure what the current prices are, but I know what I paid for
 it. How about $100 (less than I paid) plus shipping? Continental US
 only, please. I'll even throw in a fan that I was going to mount on
 the back heatsink.

 PM me. No need to clog up the list.

 Joe Gray
 W5JG

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Updated Shera controller

2010-07-29 Thread Arnold Tibus
Bert,
I'm using at the moment a thunderbolt (with spare for testpurposes
using ext. other oscillators), a nice PRS10, a FRK-HLN-1A (5MHz with
external doubler to 10 MHz) and several HP10811.
I would like to build up with this a good and reliable reference
(PPS and Frequ.). My dream would be a good autonom. TIC with timestamp
possibility. At the moment the 53132A is doing a good job, but I miss
the time stamp possibility and single measurements at defined time steps...
regards
Arnold,DK2WT


Am 29.07.2010 13:50, schrieb ewkeh...@aol.com:
 Arnold
  what do you use?  Bert Kehren
  
  
 In a message dated 7/29/2010 7:02:06 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
 arnold.ti...@gmx.de writes:
 
 I do,  and I am also interested on other  improvements!
 
 Regards,
 Arnold
 
 
 Am 29.07.2010 12:49,  schrieb ewkeh...@aol.com:
 Hi
 I think it would be nice to have  a show of hands as to how many are 
 locking 
  a Rb to GPS and what  they  use. 
 Bert Kehren
  
  
 In  a message dated 7/29/2010 4:00:31 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
  p...@phk.freebsd.dk writes:

 In  message  60eb5e7c69594f49b830463dc322e...@athlon, Ulrich Bangert  
  
 writes:
 Uhm, isn't this exactly where you want to use  the  
 still-smelling-like-brand-new-car PICTIC II with a  good DAC  
 and a microcontroller  ?

 I guess the PICTIC II is  not very good when  stop pulses arrive BEFORE 
 start
 pulses which is a   normal condition if a average time interval of zero
 between local  pps  and GPS pps is the aim.

 So configure it to use a  standard offset of one  Xtal/Rb period ?

  
 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Please send your paypal for PicTic II PCBs

2010-07-29 Thread Henk

Op 22 jul 2010, om 16:37 heeft Stanley Reynolds het volgende geschreven:

 Just tried to invoice the ones not paid yet but paypal doesn't allow enough 
 time 
 for me to complete the invoice and thinks it is OK to dump my work up to that 
 point, note to self sell ebay stock short and use money to hire someone to do 
 paperwork.
 
 The people in the EU / UK I wanted to ship at the same time to save on 
 shipping 
 but not delay the ones who have paid.
 
 No hurry for other locations as they can be shipped one at a time.
 
 Stanley
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Updated Shera controller

2010-07-29 Thread Arnold Tibus
Bert,
I forgot the Shera Board, my first device, which probably could be a bit
tuned...
Arnold


Am 29.07.2010 13:50, schrieb ewkeh...@aol.com:
 Arnold
  what do you use?  Bert Kehren
  
  
 In a message dated 7/29/2010 7:02:06 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
 arnold.ti...@gmx.de writes:
 
 I do,  and I am also interested on other  improvements!
 
 Regards,
 Arnold
 
 
 Am 29.07.2010 12:49,  schrieb ewkeh...@aol.com:
 Hi
 I think it would be nice to have  a show of hands as to how many are 
 locking 
  a Rb to GPS and what  they  use. 
 Bert Kehren
  
  
 In  a message dated 7/29/2010 4:00:31 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
  p...@phk.freebsd.dk writes:

 In  message  60eb5e7c69594f49b830463dc322e...@athlon, Ulrich Bangert  
  
 writes:
 Uhm, isn't this exactly where you want to use  the  
 still-smelling-like-brand-new-car PICTIC II with a  good DAC  
 and a microcontroller  ?

 I guess the PICTIC II is  not very good when  stop pulses arrive BEFORE 
 start
 pulses which is a   normal condition if a average time interval of zero
 between local  pps  and GPS pps is the aim.

 So configure it to use a  standard offset of one  Xtal/Rb period ?

  
 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Updated Shera controller

2010-07-29 Thread EWKehren
Arnold
how are you controlling the Rb with the Tbolt?   Bert
 
 
In a message dated 7/29/2010 11:10:16 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
arnold.ti...@gmx.de writes:

Bert,
I'm using at the moment a thunderbolt (with spare for  testpurposes
using ext. other oscillators), a nice PRS10, a FRK-HLN-1A  (5MHz with
external doubler to 10 MHz) and several HP10811.
I would like  to build up with this a good and reliable reference
(PPS and Frequ.). My  dream would be a good autonom. TIC with timestamp
possibility. At the  moment the 53132A is doing a good job, but I miss
the time stamp  possibility and single measurements at defined time  
steps...
regards
Arnold,DK2WT


Am 29.07.2010 13:50, schrieb  ewkeh...@aol.com:
 Arnold
  what do you use?  Bert  Kehren
  
  
 In a message dated 7/29/2010  7:02:06 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
 arnold.ti...@gmx.de  writes:
 
 I do,  and I am also interested on other   improvements!
 
 Regards,
 Arnold
 
  
 Am 29.07.2010 12:49,  schrieb ewkeh...@aol.com:
  Hi
 I think it would be nice to have  a show of hands as to  how many are 
 locking 
  a Rb to GPS and what   they  use. 
 Bert Kehren
  
   
 In  a message dated 7/29/2010 4:00:31 A.M. Eastern Daylight  Time,  
  p...@phk.freebsd.dk  writes:

 In  message   60eb5e7c69594f49b830463dc322e...@athlon, Ulrich 
Bangert   
  
 writes:
 Uhm, isn't this  exactly where you want to use  the  
  still-smelling-like-brand-new-car PICTIC II with a  good DAC   
 and a microcontroller   ?

 I guess the PICTIC II is  not very good  when  stop pulses arrive 
BEFORE 
 start
 pulses  which is a   normal condition if a average time interval of  
zero
 between local  pps  and GPS pps is the  aim.

 So configure it to use a  standard offset of  one  Xtal/Rb period ?

  
  

___
time-nuts mailing  list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] FS: 5370A

2010-07-29 Thread Don Latham
Mine have extra heatsink clamped on with 1 inch c-clamps...
Don

paul swed
 Interesting you were going to add a fan.
 I have 4 5370s and measured the temps on that heat sink.
 They were all the same pretty much, so figured HP knew what they were
 doing.
 But it really does feel pretty hot.
 Pretty sure what I have picked them up for is not what you paid. Plus they
 are heavy.
 Good luck with finding a new home. They are a nice counter.

 On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Joseph Gray jg...@zianet.com wrote:

 Ok guys, it has been sitting on my floor far too long and I don't know
 when I'll get around to working on it. When I last messed with it, I
 went through quite a few of the performance tests and IIRC, most
 passed. It measures frequency ok, but it's off a bit on TI
 measurements. I intended to open it up and get things up to spec, but
 never finished. It does have one intermittant BNC on the front panel
 that I haven't re-soldered yet.

 I'm not sure what the current prices are, but I know what I paid for
 it. How about $100 (less than I paid) plus shipping? Continental US
 only, please. I'll even throw in a fan that I was going to mount on
 the back heatsink.

 PM me. No need to clog up the list.

 Joe Gray
 W5JG

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



-- 
Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument are
as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind.
R. Bacon


Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] What do you use?

2010-07-29 Thread Don Latham
I have some old GR tuning forks; they're kinda noisy and bulky, but really
simple!
Don

Douglas Wire - PUPCo Studios
 I am working with an older Motorola M12M here to develop a new system for
 specialized industrial application. Simply using it for the dev. work and
 such and will finish off project with the new much better SM product and
 the
 plan is to go FPGA for the thinking. Biggest issue and have never posted
 about it is that while the task here is only to essentially end up with
 what
 will need be known freq's in particular bands with NIST type accuracy to
 drive the project, the big difficulty is NOT using an oscillator like any
 of
 my ovens. Lots of ways to go, but nothing readily seems tight enough to
 not make the entire affair a massive hassle to get to accuracy. Simple
 would
 be have a darn time base that has some accuracy - that spoils the cost.
 Maybe I should install a metronome??? Yeah not yet found any cheap
 alternative that looks suitable to go from.



 Guess that was not what you asked either. Old M12M here.

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



-- 
Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument are
as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind.
R. Bacon


Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II PIC chip group order (update)

2010-07-29 Thread Don Latham
Robert: Do you have two left?
Thanks
Don

Robert Darlington
 Hi all,

 Just a reminder that I'm going to place an order for the PICTIC PIC chips
 tonight for those in the USA that want them.  The price is $10.00 for the
 first one, $2.50 for each additional, including shipping and programming.
 1 would be $10.00 even, 3 would be $15.00, etc.

 You can PayPal me at rdarling...@gmail.com or cut me a personal check,
 cash,
 whatever.  Pretty much anything other than livestock!   Just make sure I
 have a good shipping address.I'll order a few extras for stragglers
 that
 missed this.

 Thanks,
 Bob, N3XKB
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



-- 
Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument are
as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind.
R. Bacon


Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Rb Tuning

2010-07-29 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

 

Something to think about as you go to tune your Rb:

 

1) If the tune range is 5 V for 5 x 10^-9 (+/- 2.5x10^-9) then it’s a ppb /
volt or a ppt / mV. (from http://www.ham-radio.com/sbms/LPRO-101.pdf)

2) If you are after a goal of 1x10^-13, then that’s 0.1 ppt and 0.1 mV

3) The Rb pulls a half amp to an amp running normally. 

4) One foot of number 18 wire is 6.3 mOhms (from
http://www.thelearningpit.com/elec/tools/tables/Wire_table.htm)

5) One amp in that wire will give you 6.3 mV 

6) Copper wire has a temperature coefficient of 0.00393 / C at room (1%
change in 2.5 C) (from
http://www.cirris.com/testing/temperature/copper.html)

7) The current in the Rb heater will move around a bit

 

The current and resistance would have to be stable to 1/630 or 0.15% for it
to be negligible relative to your goal. At 1.5% it would be the same as the
goal.

 

Your Rb may only be ½ as sensitive as the one in the example. It also may
pull ½ A compared to the one amp I used. That gets you to a stability that
still needs to be better than 1%. I suspect you also will find that the
connections to the wire have a *lot* more resistance than the foot of wire –
back to 0.1% land. There’s also the chance that you needed more than a foot
of wire or used something smaller than number 18. For 10 feet you would need
number 8 to get the same resistance. 

 

There are a couple of solutions:

 

1)   Reference your tuning voltage directly to the Rb ground via sense
leads.

2)   Float the controller and single point ground it at the Rb 

3)   Attenuate the control signal at the Rb by 600:1, your tune range is
now 8x10^-12 (or +/- 4x10-12).

4)   Bolt everything to a 6” x 6” copper buss bar. (or is that to small
….)

 

Sense leads probably bring in another amp in the design. It’s stability
could be an issue. Floating the controller may or may not be possible
depending on the design. Attenuating the control voltage at the Rb by 10:1
looks like a real good idea, regardless of what else you do. 

 

Of course that’s not the whole story. The connections also have thermo
electric effects.

 

So many things to worry about.  

 

Bob

 

 

 

 

 

 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] FS: 5370A

2010-07-29 Thread paul swed
Interesting so others found them a bit to warm also

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Don Latham d...@montana.com wrote:

 Mine have extra heatsink clamped on with 1 inch c-clamps...
 Don

 paul swed
  Interesting you were going to add a fan.
  I have 4 5370s and measured the temps on that heat sink.
  They were all the same pretty much, so figured HP knew what they were
  doing.
  But it really does feel pretty hot.
  Pretty sure what I have picked them up for is not what you paid. Plus
 they
  are heavy.
  Good luck with finding a new home. They are a nice counter.
 
  On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Joseph Gray jg...@zianet.com wrote:
 
  Ok guys, it has been sitting on my floor far too long and I don't know
  when I'll get around to working on it. When I last messed with it, I
  went through quite a few of the performance tests and IIRC, most
  passed. It measures frequency ok, but it's off a bit on TI
  measurements. I intended to open it up and get things up to spec, but
  never finished. It does have one intermittant BNC on the front panel
  that I haven't re-soldered yet.
 
  I'm not sure what the current prices are, but I know what I paid for
  it. How about $100 (less than I paid) plus shipping? Continental US
  only, please. I'll even throw in a fan that I was going to mount on
  the back heatsink.
 
  PM me. No need to clog up the list.
 
  Joe Gray
  W5JG
 
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 


 --
 Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument are
 as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind.
 R. Bacon


 Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
 Six Mile Systems LLP
 17850 Six Mile Road
 POB 134
 Huson, MT, 59846
 VOX 406-626-4304
 www.lightningforensics.com
 www.sixmilesystems.com


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] FS: 5370A

2010-07-29 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

Drift / failure of the three terminal regulators on the rear heat sink seems
to be an often reported issue.

Bob

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of paul swed
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 1:02 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] FS: 5370A

Interesting so others found them a bit to warm also

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Don Latham d...@montana.com wrote:

 Mine have extra heatsink clamped on with 1 inch c-clamps...
 Don

 paul swed
  Interesting you were going to add a fan.
  I have 4 5370s and measured the temps on that heat sink.
  They were all the same pretty much, so figured HP knew what they were
  doing.
  But it really does feel pretty hot.
  Pretty sure what I have picked them up for is not what you paid. Plus
 they
  are heavy.
  Good luck with finding a new home. They are a nice counter.
 
  On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Joseph Gray jg...@zianet.com wrote:
 
  Ok guys, it has been sitting on my floor far too long and I don't know
  when I'll get around to working on it. When I last messed with it, I
  went through quite a few of the performance tests and IIRC, most
  passed. It measures frequency ok, but it's off a bit on TI
  measurements. I intended to open it up and get things up to spec, but
  never finished. It does have one intermittant BNC on the front panel
  that I haven't re-soldered yet.
 
  I'm not sure what the current prices are, but I know what I paid for
  it. How about $100 (less than I paid) plus shipping? Continental US
  only, please. I'll even throw in a fan that I was going to mount on
  the back heatsink.
 
  PM me. No need to clog up the list.
 
  Joe Gray
  W5JG
 
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 


 --
 Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument are
 as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind.
 R. Bacon


 Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
 Six Mile Systems LLP
 17850 Six Mile Road
 POB 134
 Huson, MT, 59846
 VOX 406-626-4304
 www.lightningforensics.com
 www.sixmilesystems.com


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Please send your paypal for PicTic II PCBs

2010-07-29 Thread bell . d . a
Hi Stan, 
Please tell me how to pay you through Paypal. What is your Paypal account name? 
As soon as I get it I would be happy to pay you. 
Sincere thanks, David 
- Original Message - 
From: Henk h...@deriesp.demon.nl 
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com 
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 8:11:46 AM 
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Please send your paypal for PicTic II PCBs 


Op 22 jul 2010, om 16:37 heeft Stanley Reynolds het volgende geschreven: 

 Just tried to invoice the ones not paid yet but paypal doesn't allow enough 
 time 
 for me to complete the invoice and thinks it is OK to dump my work up to that 
 point, note to self sell ebay stock short and use money to hire someone to do 
 paperwork. 
 
 The people in the EU / UK I wanted to ship at the same time to save on 
 shipping 
 but not delay the ones who have paid. 
 
 No hurry for other locations as they can be shipped one at a time. 
 
 Stanley 
 
 ___ 
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com 
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts 
 and follow the instructions there. 


___ 
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com 
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts 
and follow the instructions there. 
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Updated Shera controller

2010-07-29 Thread Arnold Tibus
No problem for the PRS10 - there is an external pps input.

For the FRK-RbO I don't have a practical solution yet,
because I don't have a manual with circuit diagram found
for this 5 MHz model. This RbO is actually running free,
drift controlled by an external resistor set by two 10 turns
potentiometers. I think it should be possible to inject a
current instead. The control by eg. the Shera controller
need some modifs for this purpose which I have not yet done.
The time constant need to be modified too I think.

Arnold

Am 29.07.2010 18:09, schrieb ewkeh...@aol.com:
 Arnold
 how are you controlling the Rb with the Tbolt?   Bert
  
  
 In a message dated 7/29/2010 11:10:16 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
 arnold.ti...@gmx.de writes:
 
 Bert,
 I'm using at the moment a thunderbolt (with spare for  testpurposes
 using ext. other oscillators), a nice PRS10, a FRK-HLN-1A  (5MHz with
 external doubler to 10 MHz) and several HP10811.
 I would like  to build up with this a good and reliable reference
 (PPS and Frequ.). My  dream would be a good autonom. TIC with timestamp
 possibility. At the  moment the 53132A is doing a good job, but I miss
 the time stamp  possibility and single measurements at defined time  
 steps...
 regards
 Arnold,DK2WT
 
 
 Am 29.07.2010 13:50, schrieb  ewkeh...@aol.com:
 Arnold
  what do you use?  Bert  Kehren
  
  
 In a message dated 7/29/2010  7:02:06 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
 arnold.ti...@gmx.de  writes:

 I do,  and I am also interested on other   improvements!

 Regards,
 Arnold

  
 Am 29.07.2010 12:49,  schrieb ewkeh...@aol.com:
  Hi
 I think it would be nice to have  a show of hands as to  how many are 
 locking 
  a Rb to GPS and what   they  use. 
 Bert Kehren
  
   
 In  a message dated 7/29/2010 4:00:31 A.M. Eastern Daylight  Time,  
  p...@phk.freebsd.dk  writes:

 In  message   60eb5e7c69594f49b830463dc322e...@athlon, Ulrich 
 Bangert   
  
 writes:
 Uhm, isn't this  exactly where you want to use  the  
  still-smelling-like-brand-new-car PICTIC II with a  good DAC   
 and a microcontroller   ?

 I guess the PICTIC II is  not very good  when  stop pulses arrive 
 BEFORE 
 start
 pulses  which is a   normal condition if a average time interval of  
 zero
 between local  pps  and GPS pps is the  aim.

 So configure it to use a  standard offset of  one  Xtal/Rb period ?

  
  
 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Updated Shera controller

2010-07-29 Thread EWKehren
Arnold
Have you actually done it with the PRS10 and what was the result?
Bert
 
 
In a message dated 7/29/2010 1:52:08 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
arnold.ti...@gmx.de writes:

No  problem for the PRS10 - there is an external pps input.

For the FRK-RbO  I don't have a practical solution yet,
because I don't have a manual with  circuit diagram found
for this 5 MHz model. This RbO is actually running  free,
drift controlled by an external resistor set by two 10  turns
potentiometers. I think it should be possible to inject a
current  instead. The control by eg. the Shera controller
need some modifs for this  purpose which I have not yet done.
The time constant need to be modified  too I think.

Arnold

Am 29.07.2010 18:09, schrieb  ewkeh...@aol.com:
 Arnold
 how are you controlling the Rb with  the Tbolt?   Bert
  
  
 In a message  dated 7/29/2010 11:10:16 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
  arnold.ti...@gmx.de writes:
 
 Bert,
 I'm using at the  moment a thunderbolt (with spare for  testpurposes
 using ext.  other oscillators), a nice PRS10, a FRK-HLN-1A  (5MHz with
  external doubler to 10 MHz) and several HP10811.
 I would like  to  build up with this a good and reliable reference
 (PPS and Frequ.).  My  dream would be a good autonom. TIC with timestamp
  possibility. At the  moment the 53132A is doing a good job, but I  miss
 the time stamp  possibility and single measurements at  defined time  
 steps...
 regards
  Arnold,DK2WT
 
 
 Am 29.07.2010 13:50, schrieb   ewkeh...@aol.com:
 Arnold
  what do you use?   Bert  Kehren
  
  
 In a  message dated 7/29/2010  7:02:06 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,   
 arnold.ti...@gmx.de  writes:

 I  do,  and I am also interested on otherimprovements!

 Regards,
  Arnold

  
 Am 29.07.2010 12:49,   schrieb ewkeh...@aol.com:
  Hi
 I think it  would be nice to have  a show of hands as to  how many are  
 locking 
  a Rb to GPS and whatthey  use. 
 Bert Kehren
   
   
 In  a message dated  7/29/2010 4:00:31 A.M. Eastern Daylight  Time,   
  p...@phk.freebsd.dk   writes:

 In  message60eb5e7c69594f49b830463dc322e...@athlon, Ulrich 
  Bangert   
  
  writes:
 Uhm, isn't this  exactly where you want  to use  the  
   still-smelling-like-brand-new-car PICTIC II with a  good DAC
 and a microcontroller?

 I guess the PICTIC II is  not  very good  when  stop pulses arrive 
 BEFORE 
  start
 pulses  which is a   normal condition  if a average time interval of  
 zero
 between  local  pps  and GPS pps is the   aim.

 So configure it to use a  standard  offset of  one  Xtal/Rb period  ?

  
  
  

___
time-nuts mailing  list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Can Lady Heather Keep Computer Clock On Time?

2010-07-29 Thread Brooke Clarke

Hi:

I have a friend who's setting up an observatory and the PC that controls 
the telescope needs to have an accurate clock.
The telescope can point to within arc seconds of a star and that implies 
that the computer clock needs to be within 50 ms.
If he does a Windows NTP sync first thing in the evening after a few 
hours there's too big an error.  Running the observatory is like flying 
a 747, i.e. there's a lot to do and the time needs to be handled 
automatically, not by manual NTP updates.


I know that TAC32 and a Motorola GPS will do this and you have a lot of 
options of how it does it.  For example at a specified time interval or 
when the computer clock differs from GPS by a specified amount of time 
(50 ms in this case).


What are the options in LH?  I ask because it's a lower cost option then 
the Motorola GPS plus TAC32 option or building a NTP time server.


--
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Can Lady Heather Keep Computer Clock On Time?

2010-07-29 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

My observation is that the displayed clock on LH can be off by  10 seconds.
That's with the current beta code and Windows 7 on a quad processor machine
or under XP on a dual core machine. 

Bob

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Brooke Clarke
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 2:04 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: [time-nuts] Can Lady Heather Keep Computer Clock On Time?

Hi:

I have a friend who's setting up an observatory and the PC that controls 
the telescope needs to have an accurate clock.
The telescope can point to within arc seconds of a star and that implies 
that the computer clock needs to be within 50 ms.
If he does a Windows NTP sync first thing in the evening after a few 
hours there's too big an error.  Running the observatory is like flying 
a 747, i.e. there's a lot to do and the time needs to be handled 
automatically, not by manual NTP updates.

I know that TAC32 and a Motorola GPS will do this and you have a lot of 
options of how it does it.  For example at a specified time interval or 
when the computer clock differs from GPS by a specified amount of time 
(50 ms in this case).

What are the options in LH?  I ask because it's a lower cost option then 
the Motorola GPS plus TAC32 option or building a NTP time server.

-- 
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Updated Shera controller

2010-07-29 Thread Brooke Clarke

Hi Bert:

The PRS10 can use it's external 1 PPS input two ways.
1) as the input for a GPSDO, or
2) Time Tag (RS-232 command TT) of the input pulse
http://www.prc68.com/I/PRS10.shtml

Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com


ewkeh...@aol.com wrote:

Arnold
Have you actually done it with the PRS10 and what was the result?
Bert


In a message dated 7/29/2010 1:52:08 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
arnold.ti...@gmx.de writes:

No  problem for the PRS10 - there is an external pps input.

For the FRK-RbO  I don't have a practical solution yet,
because I don't have a manual with  circuit diagram found
for this 5 MHz model. This RbO is actually running  free,
drift controlled by an external resistor set by two 10  turns
potentiometers. I think it should be possible to inject a
current  instead. The control by eg. the Shera controller
need some modifs for this  purpose which I have not yet done.
The time constant need to be modified  too I think.

Arnold

Am 29.07.2010 18:09, schrieb  ewkeh...@aol.com:
   

Arnold
how are you controlling the Rb with  the Tbolt?   Bert


In a message  dated 7/29/2010 11:10:16 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
  arnold.ti...@gmx.de writes:

Bert,
I'm using at the  moment a thunderbolt (with spare for  testpurposes
using ext.  other oscillators), a nice PRS10, a FRK-HLN-1A  (5MHz with
  external doubler to 10 MHz) and several HP10811.
I would like  to  build up with this a good and reliable reference
(PPS and Frequ.).  My  dream would be a good autonom. TIC with timestamp
  possibility. At the  moment the 53132A is doing a good job, but I  miss
the time stamp  possibility and single measurements at  defined time
steps...
regards
  Arnold,DK2WT


Am 29.07.2010 13:50, schrieb   ewkeh...@aol.com:
 

Arnold
  what do you use?   Bert  Kehren


In a  message dated 7/29/2010  7:02:06 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
arnold.ti...@gmx.de  writes:

I  do,  and I am also interested on otherimprovements!

Regards,
  Arnold


Am 29.07.2010 12:49,   schrieb ewkeh...@aol.com:
   

  Hi
I think it  would be nice to have  a show of hands as to  how many are
 

locking
   

  a Rb to GPS and whatthey  use.
Bert Kehren


In  a message dated  7/29/2010 4:00:31 A.M. Eastern Daylight  Time,
  p...@phk.freebsd.dk   writes:

In  message60eb5e7c69594f49b830463dc322e...@athlon, Ulrich
 

  Bangert
 


   

  writes:
 

Uhm, isn't this  exactly where you want  to use  the
   still-smelling-like-brand-new-car PICTIC II with a  good DAC
and a microcontroller?
 

I guess the PICTIC II is  not  very good  when  stop pulses arrive
   

BEFORE
 

  start
 

pulses  which is a   normal condition  if a average time interval of
   

zero
 

between  local  pps  and GPS pps is the   aim.
   

So configure it to use a  standard  offset of  one  Xtal/Rb period  ?


 


   


 

___
time-nuts mailing  list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


   



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Can Lady Heather Keep Computer Clock On Time?

2010-07-29 Thread Eric Garner
with the assumption that he seems to be fine right after a sync,
(seemingly supported in the OP) reconfiguring the windows time service
to update frequently seems  to me to be the easiest answer.
under xp you can do so thus:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314054

_eric


On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:
 Hi

 My observation is that the displayed clock on LH can be off by  10 seconds.
 That's with the current beta code and Windows 7 on a quad processor machine
 or under XP on a dual core machine.

 Bob

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of Brooke Clarke
 Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 2:04 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: [time-nuts] Can Lady Heather Keep Computer Clock On Time?

 Hi:

 I have a friend who's setting up an observatory and the PC that controls
 the telescope needs to have an accurate clock.
 The telescope can point to within arc seconds of a star and that implies
 that the computer clock needs to be within 50 ms.
 If he does a Windows NTP sync first thing in the evening after a few
 hours there's too big an error.  Running the observatory is like flying
 a 747, i.e. there's a lot to do and the time needs to be handled
 automatically, not by manual NTP updates.

 I know that TAC32 and a Motorola GPS will do this and you have a lot of
 options of how it does it.  For example at a specified time interval or
 when the computer clock differs from GPS by a specified amount of time
 (50 ms in this case).

 What are the options in LH?  I ask because it's a lower cost option then
 the Motorola GPS plus TAC32 option or building a NTP time server.

 --
 Have Fun,

 Brooke Clarke
 http://www.PRC68.com



 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




-- 
--Eric
_
Eric Garner

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Can Lady Heather Keep Computer Clock On Time?

2010-07-29 Thread bg
Or even better download a real NTP for windows.

   http://www.meinberg.de/english/sw/ntp.htm#ntp_nt_stable

--

   Björn

 with the assumption that he seems to be fine right after a sync,
 (seemingly supported in the OP) reconfiguring the windows time service
 to update frequently seems  to me to be the easiest answer.
 under xp you can do so thus:
 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314054

 _eric


 On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:
 Hi

 My observation is that the displayed clock on LH can be off by  10
 seconds.
 That's with the current beta code and Windows 7 on a quad processor
 machine
 or under XP on a dual core machine.

 Bob

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of Brooke Clarke
 Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 2:04 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: [time-nuts] Can Lady Heather Keep Computer Clock On Time?

 Hi:

 I have a friend who's setting up an observatory and the PC that controls
 the telescope needs to have an accurate clock.
 The telescope can point to within arc seconds of a star and that implies
 that the computer clock needs to be within 50 ms.
 If he does a Windows NTP sync first thing in the evening after a few
 hours there's too big an error.  Running the observatory is like flying
 a 747, i.e. there's a lot to do and the time needs to be handled
 automatically, not by manual NTP updates.

 I know that TAC32 and a Motorola GPS will do this and you have a lot of
 options of how it does it.  For example at a specified time interval or
 when the computer clock differs from GPS by a specified amount of time
 (50 ms in this case).

 What are the options in LH?  I ask because it's a lower cost option then
 the Motorola GPS plus TAC32 option or building a NTP time server.

 --
 Have Fun,

 Brooke Clarke
 http://www.PRC68.com



 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




 --
 --Eric
 _
 Eric Garner

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Updated Shera controller

2010-07-29 Thread EWKehren
Thank you Brooke
I have only been with this group for a year so I am not aware of all past  
dialog.
 What has been the result driving the PRS10 with an external source  and 
was it a GPS or a Tbolt? I am not trying to be cute but if there is an  
alternative with test data I would like to buy one and compare it with what I  
presently have.
 If I am repetitive I shut up, but the proliferation of Rb's it makes  
sense to lock them to GPS, listening to some new members. To day Rb's are  
cheaper than good OCXO's!
Bert Kehren
 
 
In a message dated 7/29/2010 2:16:01 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
bro...@pacific.net writes:

Hi  Bert:

The PRS10 can use it's external 1 PPS input two ways.
1) as  the input for a GPSDO, or
2) Time Tag (RS-232 command TT) of the input  pulse
http://www.prc68.com/I/PRS10.shtml

Have Fun,

Brooke  Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com


ewkeh...@aol.com wrote:
  Arnold
 Have you actually done it with the PRS10 and what was the  result?
 Bert


 In a message dated 7/29/2010  1:52:08 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
 arnold.ti...@gmx.de  writes:

 No  problem for the PRS10 - there is an external  pps input.

 For the FRK-RbO  I don't have a practical  solution yet,
 because I don't have a manual with  circuit diagram  found
 for this 5 MHz model. This RbO is actually running   free,
 drift controlled by an external resistor set by two 10   turns
 potentiometers. I think it should be possible to inject  a
 current  instead. The control by eg. the Shera  controller
 need some modifs for this  purpose which I have not  yet done.
 The time constant need to be modified  too I  think.

 Arnold

 Am 29.07.2010 18:09,  schrieb  ewkeh...@aol.com:

  Arnold
 how are you controlling the Rb with  the  Tbolt?   Bert


 In a message   dated 7/29/2010 11:10:16 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
arnold.ti...@gmx.de writes:

 Bert,
 I'm  using at the  moment a thunderbolt (with spare for   testpurposes
 using ext.  other oscillators), a nice PRS10, a  FRK-HLN-1A  (5MHz with
   external doubler to 10  MHz) and several HP10811.
 I would like  to  build up  with this a good and reliable reference
 (PPS and Frequ.).   My  dream would be a good autonom. TIC with  
timestamp
   possibility. At the  moment the 53132A  is doing a good job, but I  
miss
 the time stamp   possibility and single measurements at  defined time
  steps...
 regards
Arnold,DK2WT


 Am 29.07.2010 13:50,  schrieb   ewkeh...@aol.com:
   
 Arnold
   what do you  use?   Bert   Kehren


 In a  message  dated 7/29/2010  7:02:06 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
  arnold.ti...@gmx.de  writes:

 I   do,  and I am also interested on other improvements!

  Regards,
Arnold


 Am 29.07.2010  12:49,   schrieb ewkeh...@aol.com:
 
   Hi
 I think  it  would be nice to have  a show of hands as to  how many  
are
  
  locking
 
   a Rb to GPS and whatthey   use.
 Bert  Kehren


 In  a  message dated  7/29/2010 4:00:31 A.M. Eastern Daylight   Time,
   p...@phk.freebsd.dkwrites:

 In   message60eb5e7c69594f49b830463dc322e...@athlon,  Ulrich
   
   Bangert
   

 
   writes:
 
 Uhm, isn't this   exactly where you want  to use   the
still-smelling-like-brand-new-car  PICTIC II with a  good DAC
 and a  microcontroller?
   
 I guess the PICTIC II  is  not  very good  when  stop pulses  arrive
 
 BEFORE
   
   start
   
 pulses  which is anormal condition  if a average time interval  of
 
 zero
  
  between  local  pps  and GPS pps is theaim.
 
 So configure it to use a  standard  offset  of  one  Xtal/Rb period   ?


 

   

  
  ___
 time-nuts  mailing  list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow  the  instructions there.

  ___
 time-nuts mailing list  -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the  instructions there.


 


___
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Can Lady Heather Keep Computer Clock On Time?

2010-07-29 Thread Brooke Clarke

Hi Eric:

That seems to be for a time server.  He is just using an ordinary PC and 
NTP to set it's time.


Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com


Eric Garner wrote:

with the assumption that he seems to be fine right after a sync,
(seemingly supported in the OP) reconfiguring the windows time service
to update frequently seems  to me to be the easiest answer.
under xp you can do so thus:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314054

_eric


On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Bob Campli...@rtty.us  wrote:
   

Hi

My observation is that the displayed clock on LH can be off by  10 seconds.
That's with the current beta code and Windows 7 on a quad processor machine
or under XP on a dual core machine.

Bob

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Brooke Clarke
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 2:04 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: [time-nuts] Can Lady Heather Keep Computer Clock On Time?

Hi:

I have a friend who's setting up an observatory and the PC that controls
the telescope needs to have an accurate clock.
The telescope can point to within arc seconds of a star and that implies
that the computer clock needs to be within 50 ms.
If he does a Windows NTP sync first thing in the evening after a few
hours there's too big an error.  Running the observatory is like flying
a 747, i.e. there's a lot to do and the time needs to be handled
automatically, not by manual NTP updates.

I know that TAC32 and a Motorola GPS will do this and you have a lot of
options of how it does it.  For example at a specified time interval or
when the computer clock differs from GPS by a specified amount of time
(50 ms in this case).

What are the options in LH?  I ask because it's a lower cost option then
the Motorola GPS plus TAC32 option or building a NTP time server.

--
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

 



   



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Can Lady Heather Keep Computer Clock On Time?

2010-07-29 Thread Eric Garner
see the section of the article Configuring the Windows Time service
to use an external time source that details how to reconfigure the
winXP time sync service so that it polls and external server for time
at a specified interval.

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Brooke Clarke bro...@pacific.net wrote:
 Hi Eric:

 That seems to be for a time server.  He is just using an ordinary PC and NTP
 to set it's time.

 Have Fun,

 Brooke Clarke
 http://www.PRC68.com


 Eric Garner wrote:

 with the assumption that he seems to be fine right after a sync,
 (seemingly supported in the OP) reconfiguring the windows time service
 to update frequently seems  to me to be the easiest answer.
 under xp you can do so thus:
 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314054

 _eric


 On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Bob Campli...@rtty.us  wrote:


 Hi

 My observation is that the displayed clock on LH can be off by  10
 seconds.
 That's with the current beta code and Windows 7 on a quad processor
 machine
 or under XP on a dual core machine.

 Bob

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of Brooke Clarke
 Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 2:04 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: [time-nuts] Can Lady Heather Keep Computer Clock On Time?

 Hi:

 I have a friend who's setting up an observatory and the PC that controls
 the telescope needs to have an accurate clock.
 The telescope can point to within arc seconds of a star and that implies
 that the computer clock needs to be within 50 ms.
 If he does a Windows NTP sync first thing in the evening after a few
 hours there's too big an error.  Running the observatory is like flying
 a 747, i.e. there's a lot to do and the time needs to be handled
 automatically, not by manual NTP updates.

 I know that TAC32 and a Motorola GPS will do this and you have a lot of
 options of how it does it.  For example at a specified time interval or
 when the computer clock differs from GPS by a specified amount of time
 (50 ms in this case).

 What are the options in LH?  I ask because it's a lower cost option then
 the Motorola GPS plus TAC32 option or building a NTP time server.

 --
 Have Fun,

 Brooke Clarke
 http://www.PRC68.com



 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.







 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




-- 
--Eric
_
Eric Garner

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Please send your paypal for PicTic II PCBs

2010-07-29 Thread Stanley Reynolds
My paypal account is stanley_reyno...@yahoo.com

boards are 9.50 usd each which includes shipping 

Stanley



- Original Message 
From: bell@comcast.net bell@comcast.net
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thu, July 29, 2010 12:24:39 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Please send your paypal for PicTic II PCBs

Hi Stan, 
Please tell me how to pay you through Paypal. What is your Paypal account name? 
As soon as I get it I would be happy to pay you. 

Sincere thanks, David 
- Original Message - 
From: Henk h...@deriesp.demon.nl 
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com 
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 8:11:46 AM 
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Please send your paypal for PicTic II PCBs 


Op 22 jul 2010, om 16:37 heeft Stanley Reynolds het volgende geschreven: 

 Just tried to invoice the ones not paid yet but paypal doesn't allow enough 
time 

 for me to complete the invoice and thinks it is OK to dump my work up to that 
 point, note to self sell ebay stock short and use money to hire someone to do 
 paperwork. 
 
 The people in the EU / UK I wanted to ship at the same time to save on 
 shipping 

 but not delay the ones who have paid. 
 
 No hurry for other locations as they can be shipped one at a time. 
 
 Stanley 
 
 ___ 
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com 
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts 
 and follow the instructions there. 


___ 
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com 
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts 
and follow the instructions there. 
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] HP 5335A Option 040

2010-07-29 Thread Dr. Frank Stellmach

Hi,

there exist three manuals,
5335-90005 - Serial #2024A and below, 1980, preliminary pdf manual on 
agilent.com
5335-90021 - Serial #2224A and below, 1983, pdf from Artekmedia, very 
good scan for $7.50
5335-90044 - Serial #3154A and below, 1994, very good reprint from 
manualsplus for about 70$


If you don't have the latest device, Artek Media document is absolutely 
sufficient for description of Opt. 040, i.e. HPIB instruction set and 
schematics. (SW is different, also input amplifier / front end   A12  
and amplifier support A11)



Btw.: I've got a nice 5335A with ser no 2820, Opt. 10, 30 , 40 (10811 
oven, 1,3Ghz C-input - latest divide-by-64 version, and full front end 
remote steering).


I've found out, that it definitely resolves 1ns in Time and Freq. 
measurements, in contrast to 2ns as stated by all the latest specs. in 
the manuals and all the HP catalogues.


Gordon, and other 5335 owners - would you please check your instruments 
on that, to find out if firmware has changed later on, or simply if the 
specification is wrong?



I get 11 significant digits over the bus and on the display, if I 
measure for 100s.
I'd expect 12 digits for 1000s at least over the bus, as 14 digits are 
reserved for the mantissa (incl. sign and decimal point) but nothing 
happens.


Anybody got an idea, how to get more digits, perhaps with undocumented 
commands?
This counter potentially delivers nearly unlimited resolution, as the 
overflow is counted in many additional bytes, which I would like to read 
out.



Thanks - Frank

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Rb Tuning

2010-07-29 Thread Didier Juges
Attenuating the control voltage near the point of use is always a good idea 
when you are concerned about common mode or ground noise and particularly when 
you have excess dynamic range, but you have to consider the noise added by the 
divider. Some filtering may be required, and use as low a set of resistor 
values as practical.

Didier

 
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless thingy while I do other things...

-Original Message-
From: Bob Camp li...@rtty.us
Sender: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:41:47 
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'time-nuts@febo.com
Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Rb Tuning

Hi

 

Something to think about as you go to tune your Rb:

 

1) If the tune range is 5 V for 5 x 10^-9 (+/- 2.5x10^-9) then it’s a ppb /
volt or a ppt / mV. (from http://www.ham-radio.com/sbms/LPRO-101.pdf)

2) If you are after a goal of 1x10^-13, then that’s 0.1 ppt and 0.1 mV

3) The Rb pulls a half amp to an amp running normally. 

4) One foot of number 18 wire is 6.3 mOhms (from
http://www.thelearningpit.com/elec/tools/tables/Wire_table.htm)

5) One amp in that wire will give you 6.3 mV 

6) Copper wire has a temperature coefficient of 0.00393 / C at room (1%
change in 2.5 C) (from
http://www.cirris.com/testing/temperature/copper.html)

7) The current in the Rb heater will move around a bit

 

The current and resistance would have to be stable to 1/630 or 0.15% for it
to be negligible relative to your goal. At 1.5% it would be the same as the
goal.

 

Your Rb may only be ½ as sensitive as the one in the example. It also may
pull ½ A compared to the one amp I used. That gets you to a stability that
still needs to be better than 1%. I suspect you also will find that the
connections to the wire have a *lot* more resistance than the foot of wire –
back to 0.1% land. There’s also the chance that you needed more than a foot
of wire or used something smaller than number 18. For 10 feet you would need
number 8 to get the same resistance. 

 

There are a couple of solutions:

 

1)   Reference your tuning voltage directly to the Rb ground via sense
leads.

2)   Float the controller and single point ground it at the Rb 

3)   Attenuate the control signal at the Rb by 600:1, your tune range is
now 8x10^-12 (or +/- 4x10-12).

4)   Bolt everything to a 6” x 6” copper buss bar. (or is that to small
….)

 

Sense leads probably bring in another amp in the design. It’s stability
could be an issue. Floating the controller may or may not be possible
depending on the design. Attenuating the control voltage at the Rb by 10:1
looks like a real good idea, regardless of what else you do. 

 

Of course that’s not the whole story. The connections also have thermo
electric effects.

 

So many things to worry about.  

 

Bob

 

 

 

 

 

 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Faulty GPS SAT # 16 on Lady Heather

2010-07-29 Thread Dr. Frank Stellmach
Once again, one of the 8 received satellites (#16) delivers no 
contribution to the time ensmble, although it got is over 40dbc 
strength. Lady Heather (beta 3.00) shows a hollow circle in the diagram, 
marked yellow in the list, and it has zero CLOCK BIAS and ACCU=0.


Does anybody know, if that satellite is defect (e.g. Cs down), or if it 
has a special task, i.e. military purposes only?


Frank

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Faulty GPS SAT # 16 on Lady Heather

2010-07-29 Thread bg
It seems it is beeing moved.

56   16  Launched 29 JAN 2003; usable 18 FEB 2003; operating on Rb std
   Scheduled unusable 29 Jul 1345 UT to 30 Jul 0145 UT for
 repositioning maintenance (NANU 2010102)

from   ftp://tycho.usno.navy.mil/pub/gps/gpstd.txt

btw the Elmer Perkins Rb's beats most/all space CS out to a few days.
Since the ground crew updates clock preditions every day, there is not
that much need for the Cs _long_ term stability.

--

   Björn

 Once again, one of the 8 received satellites (#16) delivers no
 contribution to the time ensmble, although it got is over 40dbc
 strength. Lady Heather (beta 3.00) shows a hollow circle in the diagram,
 marked yellow in the list, and it has zero CLOCK BIAS and ACCU=0.

 Does anybody know, if that satellite is defect (e.g. Cs down), or if it
 has a special task, i.e. military purposes only?

 Frank

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Faulty GPS SAT # 16 on Lady Heather

2010-07-29 Thread Richard W. Solomon
Elmer Perkins ??

I know of Perkin Elmer.

73, Dick, W1KSZ


-Original Message-
From: b...@lysator.liu.se
Sent: Jul 29, 2010 5:41 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Faulty GPS SAT # 16 on Lady Heather

It seems it is beeing moved.

56   16  Launched 29 JAN 2003; usable 18 FEB 2003; operating on Rb std
   Scheduled unusable 29 Jul 1345 UT to 30 Jul 0145 UT for
 repositioning maintenance (NANU 2010102)

from   ftp://tycho.usno.navy.mil/pub/gps/gpstd.txt

btw the Elmer Perkins Rb's beats most/all space CS out to a few days.
Since the ground crew updates clock preditions every day, there is not
that much need for the Cs _long_ term stability.

--

   Björn

 Once again, one of the 8 received satellites (#16) delivers no
 contribution to the time ensmble, although it got is over 40dbc
 strength. Lady Heather (beta 3.00) shows a hollow circle in the diagram,
 marked yellow in the list, and it has zero CLOCK BIAS and ACCU=0.

 Does anybody know, if that satellite is defect (e.g. Cs down), or if it
 has a special task, i.e. military purposes only?

 Frank

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Faulty GPS SAT # 16 on Lady Heather

2010-07-29 Thread bg
Thanks!

My mistake. Sorry! Should not be posting this late.

--

   Björn

 Elmer Perkins ??

 I know of Perkin Elmer.

 73, Dick, W1KSZ


 -Original Message-
From: b...@lysator.liu.se
Sent: Jul 29, 2010 5:41 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Faulty GPS SAT # 16 on Lady Heather

It seems it is beeing moved.

56   16  Launched 29 JAN 2003; usable 18 FEB 2003; operating on Rb std
   Scheduled unusable 29 Jul 1345 UT to 30 Jul 0145 UT for
 repositioning maintenance (NANU 2010102)

from   ftp://tycho.usno.navy.mil/pub/gps/gpstd.txt

btw the Elmer Perkins Rb's beats most/all space CS out to a few days.
Since the ground crew updates clock preditions every day, there is not
that much need for the Cs _long_ term stability.

--

   Björn

 Once again, one of the 8 received satellites (#16) delivers no
 contribution to the time ensmble, although it got is over 40dbc
 strength. Lady Heather (beta 3.00) shows a hollow circle in the
 diagram,
 marked yellow in the list, and it has zero CLOCK BIAS and ACCU=0.

 Does anybody know, if that satellite is defect (e.g. Cs down), or if it
 has a special task, i.e. military purposes only?

 Frank

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Faulty GPS SAT # 16 on Lady Heather

2010-07-29 Thread Oz-in-DFW
 Dunno, kinda like it as nickname.

On 7/29/2010 5:02 PM, b...@lysator.liu.se wrote:
 Thanks!

 My mistake. Sorry! Should not be posting this late.

 --

Björn

 Elmer Perkins ??

 I know of Perkin Elmer.

 73, Dick, W1KSZ


-- 
mailto:o...@ozindfw.net
Oz
POB 93167 
Southlake, TX 76092 (Near DFW Airport) 




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Can Lady Heather Keep Computer Clock On Time?

2010-07-29 Thread Mark Sims

Yes,  there is a time sync command that causes the program to set the system 
clock at periodic intervals or whenever it differs from GPS by a given amount.
I'm still out on the Project From Hell Mark II and I don't remember all the 
gory details...  I think /TSA on the command line  says sync the time whenever 
the clocks differ by a millisecond.  There is also /TSO /TSD /TSH /TSM /TSS to 
set it once, hourly, daily, every minute or second.  There is also a /TSX 
command to specify the time offset from the Tbolt serial command to GPS (which 
is usually around 45 milliseconds).  TS from the keyboard just syncs the clock 
once. 
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Updated Shera controller

2010-07-29 Thread Brian Kirby
Have you looked at using the TAC32 software?.  You can use the 53131A 
with it and a GPS receiver and time tag data and log the time interval. 
 You can tell it to record a one second file, and a average file, for 
what ever you set the 53131A up to average, and it will also generate a 
satellite status file.  TAC32 is designed for Motorola GPS receivers. 
It generates daily files automatically.  Great for long term monitoring, 
I use it to compare a HP5065A rubidium to GPS via a Motorola M12+ receiver.


Brian

On 7/29/2010 10:09 AM, Arnold Tibus wrote:

Bert,
I'm using at the moment a thunderbolt (with spare for testpurposes
using ext. other oscillators), a nice PRS10, a FRK-HLN-1A (5MHz with
external doubler to 10 MHz) and several HP10811.
I would like to build up with this a good and reliable reference
(PPS and Frequ.). My dream would be a good autonom. TIC with timestamp
possibility. At the moment the 53132A is doing a good job, but I miss
the time stamp possibility and single measurements at defined time steps...
regards
Arnold,DK2WT




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Can Lady Heather Keep Computer Clock On Time?

2010-07-29 Thread Hal Murray

 The telescope can point to within arc seconds of a star and that implies
 that the computer clock needs to be within 50 ms.

 If he does a Windows NTP sync first thing in the evening after a few hours
 there's too big an error.

That looks like the classic time vs frequency problem.

What is the primary goal?  Pointing or tracking?  Pointing requires time.  
Tracking requires frequency.

If you are otherwise happy with Windows NTP sync, you may be able to solve 
your problem by doing a sync before pointing at another object if it's been 
more than N hours since the last sync.


Long song and dance  [Remember, I don't run Windows so I may screwup 
anything that's Windows specific.]


The typical PC has 2 crystals.  One runs at 32 KHz.  The other is usually 
14.xxx (from early PC days) that gets PLLed up to make clocks for the CPU and 
PCI and USB and ...

The 32KHz crystal runs the battery backed RTC/TOY/CMOS clock.  It's a watch 
crystal so it should be pretty good.  But it's not very convenient for 
keeping time at the microsecond level.

The 14 MHz crystal is stable, but typically not very accurate.  (Remember low 
cost.)  That's accurate at the PPM level, it will be fine if you just put a 
scope on it.  It may be off by 50  PPM.  Even if the hardware is good, the 
software can screw things up.  (Linux is good at this.  Current kernels don't 
get a consistent answer on the same hardware.  Jumps by 200 PPM from boot to 
boot are not uncommon.)

[Network and audio and ??? cards typically have a separate crystal.  They are 
usually not convenient for timekeeping but if you do serious audio work you 
can measure it's actual frequency.]

Let's see if I can do the math right...

3 hours is 10,000 seconds.  50 PPM times 10,000 seconds is 500,000 
microseconds.  So if the clock is off by 50 PPM, it will drift 1/2 second in 
3 hours.  Even 5 PPM will drift 50 ms in 3 hours.


The main reason for running real ntpd rather than just setting the time 
occasionally is that ntpd will figure out how far off the frequency is and 
correct for it.  ntpd calls that fudge factor drift and prints it out in 
PPM with 3 digits to the right of the decimal point.

If all you need is 50 ms, you should be able to get that most of the time by 
just running ntpd over the net.  It's sure worth a try.  It may not be good 
enough if you have a crappy net connection or change from no-load to 
uploading tons of data from observations earlier in the evening.  (Contact me 
off list if you want help in monitoring a ntp server and/or setting up and 
interpreting its log files.)



Odds and ends to keep in mind...

Modern PCs use spread spectrum clocking.  That fudges things by 1 or 1/2 % or 
so which is huge in terms of PPM.  The point is that you have to measure it.  
Just doing the math from the nominal CPU frequency isn't good enough.

The actual frequency is temperature dependent, so things will change if you 
open the roof and let the cold air in or the CPU changes from idle (or off) 
to working hard.  The ballpark is 1 PPM per 10 F.

One of the classic ways to screwup timekeeping is to miss interrupts, 
typically because some other interrupt routine is running too long.  This was 
easy to tickle on (very) old Linux systems that used PIO rather than DMA for 
disk transfers.  I only mention it because you might have some strange 
hardware with buggy interrupt routines.

Normal Windows clocks tick every 10 ms.  Windows has a multimedia mode that 
does much better.  There is a switch in the Registry or something.  It may 
help to use that mode.  I think you want to leave it on.  (The Meinberg 
ntpd-installer package turns it on.)

ntpd is both a client and server.  A system will act as a client to get time 
from lower stratum servers and act as a server to provide time to higher 
stratum servers.



-- 
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's.  I hate spam.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Rb Tuning

2010-07-29 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

A divider can do harm if poorly implemented. Knowing the source and load 
characteristics can be a big help.

Bob 



On Jul 29, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Didier Juges did...@cox.net wrote:

 Attenuating the control voltage near the point of use is always a good idea 
 when you are concerned about common mode or ground noise and particularly 
 when you have excess dynamic range, but you have to consider the noise added 
 by the divider. Some filtering may be required, and use as low a set of 
 resistor values as practical.
 
 Didier
 
  
 Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless thingy while I do other things...
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Bob Camp li...@rtty.us
 Sender: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:41:47 
 To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'time-nuts@febo.com
 Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
   time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: [time-nuts] Rb Tuning
 
 Hi
 
 
 
 Something to think about as you go to tune your Rb:
 
 
 
 1) If the tune range is 5 V for 5 x 10^-9 (+/- 2.5x10^-9) then it’s a ppb /
 volt or a ppt / mV. (from http://www.ham-radio.com/sbms/LPRO-101.pdf)
 
 2) If you are after a goal of 1x10^-13, then that’s 0.1 ppt and 0.1 mV
 
 3) The Rb pulls a half amp to an amp running normally. 
 
 4) One foot of number 18 wire is 6.3 mOhms (from
 http://www.thelearningpit.com/elec/tools/tables/Wire_table.htm)
 
 5) One amp in that wire will give you 6.3 mV 
 
 6) Copper wire has a temperature coefficient of 0.00393 / C at room (1%
 change in 2.5 C) (from
 http://www.cirris.com/testing/temperature/copper.html)
 
 7) The current in the Rb heater will move around a bit
 
 
 
 The current and resistance would have to be stable to 1/630 or 0.15% for it
 to be negligible relative to your goal. At 1.5% it would be the same as the
 goal.
 
 
 
 Your Rb may only be ½ as sensitive as the one in the example. It also may
 pull ½ A compared to the one amp I used. That gets you to a stability that
 still needs to be better than 1%. I suspect you also will find that the
 connections to the wire have a *lot* more resistance than the foot of wire –
 back to 0.1% land. There’s also the chance that you needed more than a foot
 of wire or used something smaller than number 18. For 10 feet you would need
 number 8 to get the same resistance. 
 
 
 
 There are a couple of solutions:
 
 
 
 1)   Reference your tuning voltage directly to the Rb ground via sense
 leads.
 
 2)   Float the controller and single point ground it at the Rb 
 
 3)   Attenuate the control signal at the Rb by 600:1, your tune range is
 now 8x10^-12 (or +/- 4x10-12).
 
 4)   Bolt everything to a 6” x 6” copper buss bar. (or is that to small
 ….)
 
 
 
 Sense leads probably bring in another amp in the design. It’s stability
 could be an issue. Floating the controller may or may not be possible
 depending on the design. Attenuating the control voltage at the Rb by 10:1
 looks like a real good idea, regardless of what else you do. 
 
 
 
 Of course that’s not the whole story. The connections also have thermo
 electric effects.
 
 
 
 So many things to worry about.  
 
 
 
 Bob
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Faulty GPS SAT # 16 on Lady Heather

2010-07-29 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

The main need for Cs apparently is no longer an issue.

Bob



On Jul 29, 2010, at 5:41 PM, b...@lysator.liu.se wrote:

 It seems it is beeing moved.
 
 56   16  Launched 29 JAN 2003; usable 18 FEB 2003; operating on Rb std
   Scheduled unusable 29 Jul 1345 UT to 30 Jul 0145 UT for
 repositioning maintenance (NANU 2010102)
 
 from   ftp://tycho.usno.navy.mil/pub/gps/gpstd.txt
 
 btw the Elmer Perkins Rb's beats most/all space CS out to a few days.
 Since the ground crew updates clock preditions every day, there is not
 that much need for the Cs _long_ term stability.
 
 --
 
   Björn
 
 Once again, one of the 8 received satellites (#16) delivers no
 contribution to the time ensmble, although it got is over 40dbc
 strength. Lady Heather (beta 3.00) shows a hollow circle in the diagram,
 marked yellow in the list, and it has zero CLOCK BIAS and ACCU=0.
 
 Does anybody know, if that satellite is defect (e.g. Cs down), or if it
 has a special task, i.e. military purposes only?
 
 Frank
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Can Lady Heather Keep Computer Clock On Time?

2010-07-29 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

There is a standard NTP driver that talks Thunderbolt. The full blown NTP 
package is pretty easy to set up. It will hold ms accuracy slaved to a GPS.

Bob



On Jul 29, 2010, at 7:29 PM, Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote:

 
 The telescope can point to within arc seconds of a star and that implies
 that the computer clock needs to be within 50 ms.
 
 If he does a Windows NTP sync first thing in the evening after a few hours
 there's too big an error.
 
 That looks like the classic time vs frequency problem.
 
 What is the primary goal?  Pointing or tracking?  Pointing requires time.  
 Tracking requires frequency.
 
 If you are otherwise happy with Windows NTP sync, you may be able to solve 
 your problem by doing a sync before pointing at another object if it's been 
 more than N hours since the last sync.
 
 
 Long song and dance  [Remember, I don't run Windows so I may screwup 
 anything that's Windows specific.]
 
 
 The typical PC has 2 crystals.  One runs at 32 KHz.  The other is usually 
 14.xxx (from early PC days) that gets PLLed up to make clocks for the CPU and 
 PCI and USB and ...
 
 The 32KHz crystal runs the battery backed RTC/TOY/CMOS clock.  It's a watch 
 crystal so it should be pretty good.  But it's not very convenient for 
 keeping time at the microsecond level.
 
 The 14 MHz crystal is stable, but typically not very accurate.  (Remember low 
 cost.)  That's accurate at the PPM level, it will be fine if you just put a 
 scope on it.  It may be off by 50  PPM.  Even if the hardware is good, the 
 software can screw things up.  (Linux is good at this.  Current kernels don't 
 get a consistent answer on the same hardware.  Jumps by 200 PPM from boot to 
 boot are not uncommon.)
 
 [Network and audio and ??? cards typically have a separate crystal.  They are 
 usually not convenient for timekeeping but if you do serious audio work you 
 can measure it's actual frequency.]
 
 Let's see if I can do the math right...
 
 3 hours is 10,000 seconds.  50 PPM times 10,000 seconds is 500,000 
 microseconds.  So if the clock is off by 50 PPM, it will drift 1/2 second in 
 3 hours.  Even 5 PPM will drift 50 ms in 3 hours.
 
 
 The main reason for running real ntpd rather than just setting the time 
 occasionally is that ntpd will figure out how far off the frequency is and 
 correct for it.  ntpd calls that fudge factor drift and prints it out in 
 PPM with 3 digits to the right of the decimal point.
 
 If all you need is 50 ms, you should be able to get that most of the time by 
 just running ntpd over the net.  It's sure worth a try.  It may not be good 
 enough if you have a crappy net connection or change from no-load to 
 uploading tons of data from observations earlier in the evening.  (Contact me 
 off list if you want help in monitoring a ntp server and/or setting up and 
 interpreting its log files.)
 
 
 
 Odds and ends to keep in mind...
 
 Modern PCs use spread spectrum clocking.  That fudges things by 1 or 1/2 % or 
 so which is huge in terms of PPM.  The point is that you have to measure it.  
 Just doing the math from the nominal CPU frequency isn't good enough.
 
 The actual frequency is temperature dependent, so things will change if you 
 open the roof and let the cold air in or the CPU changes from idle (or off) 
 to working hard.  The ballpark is 1 PPM per 10 F.
 
 One of the classic ways to screwup timekeeping is to miss interrupts, 
 typically because some other interrupt routine is running too long.  This was 
 easy to tickle on (very) old Linux systems that used PIO rather than DMA for 
 disk transfers.  I only mention it because you might have some strange 
 hardware with buggy interrupt routines.
 
 Normal Windows clocks tick every 10 ms.  Windows has a multimedia mode that 
 does much better.  There is a switch in the Registry or something.  It may 
 help to use that mode.  I think you want to leave it on.  (The Meinberg 
 ntpd-installer package turns it on.)
 
 ntpd is both a client and server.  A system will act as a client to get time 
 from lower stratum servers and act as a server to provide time to higher 
 stratum servers.
 
 
 
 -- 
 These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's.  I hate spam.
 
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Can Lady Heather Keep Computer Clock On Time?

2010-07-29 Thread Brooke Clarke

Hi Hal:

The key thing is pointing, not tracking (where a guide star is commonly 
used).
A TPoint model is made by pointing to known stars and the quality of the 
model depends on good computer time.


Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com


Hal Murray wrote:
   

The telescope can point to within arc seconds of a star and that implies
that the computer clock needs to be within 50 ms.
 
   

If he does a Windows NTP sync first thing in the evening after a few hours
there's too big an error.
 

That looks like the classic time vs frequency problem.

What is the primary goal?  Pointing or tracking?  Pointing requires time.
Tracking requires frequency.

If you are otherwise happy with Windows NTP sync, you may be able to solve
your problem by doing a sync before pointing at another object if it's been
more than N hours since the last sync.


Long song and dance  [Remember, I don't run Windows so I may screwup
anything that's Windows specific.]


The typical PC has 2 crystals.  One runs at 32 KHz.  The other is usually
14.xxx (from early PC days) that gets PLLed up to make clocks for the CPU and
PCI and USB and ...

The 32KHz crystal runs the battery backed RTC/TOY/CMOS clock.  It's a watch
crystal so it should be pretty good.  But it's not very convenient for
keeping time at the microsecond level.

The 14 MHz crystal is stable, but typically not very accurate.  (Remember low
cost.)  That's accurate at the PPM level, it will be fine if you just put a
scope on it.  It may be off by 50  PPM.  Even if the hardware is good, the
software can screw things up.  (Linux is good at this.  Current kernels don't
get a consistent answer on the same hardware.  Jumps by 200 PPM from boot to
boot are not uncommon.)

[Network and audio and ??? cards typically have a separate crystal.  They are
usually not convenient for timekeeping but if you do serious audio work you
can measure it's actual frequency.]

Let's see if I can do the math right...

3 hours is 10,000 seconds.  50 PPM times 10,000 seconds is 500,000
microseconds.  So if the clock is off by 50 PPM, it will drift 1/2 second in
3 hours.  Even 5 PPM will drift 50 ms in 3 hours.


The main reason for running real ntpd rather than just setting the time
occasionally is that ntpd will figure out how far off the frequency is and
correct for it.  ntpd calls that fudge factor drift and prints it out in
PPM with 3 digits to the right of the decimal point.

If all you need is 50 ms, you should be able to get that most of the time by
just running ntpd over the net.  It's sure worth a try.  It may not be good
enough if you have a crappy net connection or change from no-load to
uploading tons of data from observations earlier in the evening.  (Contact me
off list if you want help in monitoring a ntp server and/or setting up and
interpreting its log files.)



Odds and ends to keep in mind...

Modern PCs use spread spectrum clocking.  That fudges things by 1 or 1/2 % or
so which is huge in terms of PPM.  The point is that you have to measure it.
Just doing the math from the nominal CPU frequency isn't good enough.

The actual frequency is temperature dependent, so things will change if you
open the roof and let the cold air in or the CPU changes from idle (or off)
to working hard.  The ballpark is 1 PPM per 10 F.

One of the classic ways to screwup timekeeping is to miss interrupts,
typically because some other interrupt routine is running too long.  This was
easy to tickle on (very) old Linux systems that used PIO rather than DMA for
disk transfers.  I only mention it because you might have some strange
hardware with buggy interrupt routines.

Normal Windows clocks tick every 10 ms.  Windows has a multimedia mode that
does much better.  There is a switch in the Registry or something.  It may
help to use that mode.  I think you want to leave it on.  (The Meinberg
ntpd-installer package turns it on.)

ntpd is both a client and server.  A system will act as a client to get time
from lower stratum servers and act as a server to provide time to higher
stratum servers.



   



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Faulty GPS SAT # 16 on Lady Heather

2010-07-29 Thread Henry Hallam
Yes, forecast downtime due to delta V maneuvering.  I believe it's
related to the reorganisation of the constellation from 21+3 to 24+3:
http://blogs.agi.com/navigationAccuracy/?p=315

Henry


On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 2:41 PM,  b...@lysator.liu.se wrote:
 It seems it is beeing moved.

 56   16  Launched 29 JAN 2003; usable 18 FEB 2003; operating on Rb std
           Scheduled unusable 29 Jul 1345 UT to 30 Jul 0145 UT for
             repositioning maintenance (NANU 2010102)

 from   ftp://tycho.usno.navy.mil/pub/gps/gpstd.txt

 btw the Elmer Perkins Rb's beats most/all space CS out to a few days.
 Since the ground crew updates clock preditions every day, there is not
 that much need for the Cs _long_ term stability.

 --

   Björn

 Once again, one of the 8 received satellites (#16) delivers no
 contribution to the time ensmble, although it got is over 40dbc
 strength. Lady Heather (beta 3.00) shows a hollow circle in the diagram,
 marked yellow in the list, and it has zero CLOCK BIAS and ACCU=0.

 Does anybody know, if that satellite is defect (e.g. Cs down), or if it
 has a special task, i.e. military purposes only?

 Frank

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




-- 
Henry Hallam

Sent from my Laptop

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.