Re: [time-nuts] 10.23 MHz SC cut 10811 compatible crystals available

2010-11-15 Thread Magnus Danielson

Rick,

On 11/15/2010 06:25 AM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:

Someone was asking about SC cut crystals to play with.
I have a few dozen 10.23 MHz SC cut crystals that are
interchangeable with 10811 10 MHz crystals, except for
the frequency difference. They were made for a GPS
version of the 10811 that never saw the light of day.
Any interest in these?


Vigorous hand-waving. Yes.

Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] ADEV

2010-11-15 Thread Mike Feher
10 MHz locked LNBs do not use a separate connector. Everything goes down/up
the single main coax. The typical L-band down-converted frequency and the 10
MHz are easily separated, as is the DC. These are definitely not
inexpensive. Regards - Mike 

Mike B. Feher, EOZ Inc.
89 Arnold Blvd.
Howell, NJ, 07731
732-886-5960 office
908-901-9193 cell

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of jimlux
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 11:49 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] ADEV

David I. Emery wrote:

   3. External reference LNBs with 10 MHz (pretty universal) going
 up the cable that also carries power and brings the L band signal down.
 I'm not entirely sure how many of these designs simply bandpass filter
 and then limit the 10 MHz and use that directly as a PLL reference and
 how many phase lock a VCXO to the 10 MHz coming in.  Otherwise similar
 (and often  derived from designs for) the internal reference PLL types
 in 2 above.

And, I'll bet those are fairly pricey.. (after all, it needs another 
connector, and that's a price sensitive application..)



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] How does one actually do Allan variation graphs?

2010-11-15 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

The only reason the check list is any good is the - gee if I'd checked that I 
would not have bought this one syndrome ...



The same socketed ROMs on the A that have issues while they are live are 
easier to replace if / when they go bad. 

---

Many of these counters (any model) spent their life on an external standard. 
Having an OCXO that's a ppm or two off is not unusual. What you want to watch 
out for is the one that's 30 or 40 ppm off.

Bob

On Nov 14, 2010, at 11:15 PM, John Miles wrote:

 Bob's checklist is a good one, all right.  It is important to get a solid
 working example because they are quite challenging to troubleshoot and
 calibrate.
 
 The only problem with the 5370A as far as I'm aware is the reduced
 reliability caused by the larger number of socketed ROM chips.
 
 It seems that many, if not most, 5370s were used with external 10 MHz
 references.  If you're patient, you can wait for one to show up on eBay with
 a display that is blank except for one bright LED.  Buy it cheap, and flip
 the external-reference switch back to internal-reference mode when you get
 it.  Easy fix!
 
 -- john, KE5FX
 
 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]on
 Behalf Of paul swed
 Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 8:01 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] How does one actually do Allan variation
 graphs?
 
 
 Really good advice on what to checkout.
 5370s are the devil to fix if somethings wrong such as jitter.
 Good luck.
 Paul
 
 On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:
 
 Hi
 
 Like a lot of stuff, the going price for these has dropped.
 They get less
 and less respect every day ...
 
 One thing that may be specific to me - I do not consider a
 5370A to be any
 more or less valuable than a 5370B. They both do pretty much
 the same thing.
 The 5370B might have fewer hours on it, it might not. On average 5370A
 prices seem to run slightly higher than 5370B prices. Why is a
 mystery to
 me.
 
 Bob
 
 
 On Nov 14, 2010, at 11:57 AM, William H. Fite wrote:
 
 Thanks, Bob
 
 He's asking $400 but I can tell by the look in his eye that he'll take
 substantially less.
 
 He's a lousy poker player, too...
 
 I asked him to turn it on about 0900 this morning and I'm
 going over in
 an
 hour or so to check it out.
 
 Thanks again,
 
 Bill
 
 
 
 
 On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:
 
 Hi
 
 Assuming:
 
 1) All the knobs and switches are intact and working
 2) All the led's in the display work
 3) All the alarm and indicator LED's work
 4) The input amps are good
 5) All the connectors are intact
 6) The OCXO is good / on frequency
 7) It passes the diags
 8) Jitter is down below 100 ps ( should be below 40)
 9) You can check all this out before purchace. Let the beast
 warm up for
 at
 least an hour before you check it.
 
 Something in the $180 to $260 range is probably fair depending on
 cosmetics. You might start out at $150 in order to
 compromise at $200. I
 certainly would not pay over $300. I know the list sounds a bit long,
 but
 I've seen 5370's with problems in each of those areas. Pretty much
 anything
 damaged / non-functional would knock a pretty good chunk off
 the price.
 
 Bob
 
 
 On Nov 14, 2010, at 11:29 AM, William H. Fite wrote:
 
 Gentlemen,
 
 What is a reasonable price for a 5370A?  Local guy here is trying to
 hawk
 one to me.  Not cosmetically perfect but fully operational.
 
 Yes, I know someone is going to say, I got one for 50 bucks.  But
 really,
 what is a fair price?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Bill
 
 
 
 
 On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Magnus Danielson 
 mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
 
 On 11/14/2010 09:41 AM, John Miles wrote:
 
 
 I’ve looked at Wikipedia and I am as lost as when I started.
 
 Could someone walk me through the process step by step and also
 tell me what test equipment is required?
 
 
 Besides the pointers at www.leapsecond.com , I've collected a few
 links
 at http://www.ke5fx.com/stability.htm that may be helpful.
 
 The first .PDF link on that page is my presentation from the
 Microwave
 Update conference a few weeks ago.  It was meant as an
 introductory
 Stability Measurement for Radio Nuts talk, discussing
 the state of
 the
 commercial art in light of what's available to hobbyists.
 
 The NIST links under General timing and noise metrology, in
 particular
 this one ( http://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/2220.pdf ) are
 excellent.
 
 If you have an HP 5370A/B counter and a GPIB interface
 you can do a
 lot
 of
 good measurement work.  With the appropriate software you can make
 conventional strip-chart style plots of frequency and
 phase, as well
 as
 ADEV
 and similar plots.  Unless you are a software nut you
 probably do not
 want
 to homebrew the necessary code to do this.  Most people
 don't use the
 same
 program for acquisition and plotting; a script or batch
 file does the
 job of
 

[time-nuts] Getting Started in High Precision Timing

2010-11-15 Thread Matt Davis
Hello all,
I have been a software hacker for years but have never really done too
much hardware hacking.  I have been looking at oxco modules, but the
data sheets of various vendors do not really provide me with a good
basis as to what such an oscillator would provide me.  I assume its
just oscillation given the given frequency.  Do any of you all have
any good links/resources aside from what a basic google would provide,
as to how to get the data from the oscillator at a pulse-per-second
rate allowing me to do some basic timing.  Really, I'm just looking
for some first steps in hacking on these high-precision oscillators.

Thanks

-Matt

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 10.23 MHz SC cut 10811 compatible crystals available

2010-11-15 Thread Scott Newell

At 11:25 PM 11/14/2010, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:

Someone was asking about SC cut crystals to play with.
I have a few dozen 10.23 MHz SC cut crystals that are
interchangeable with 10811 10 MHz crystals, except for
the frequency difference.  They were made for a GPS
version of the 10811 that never saw the light of day.
Any interest in these?


Yep. 



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] microwave radio cameras Re: ADEV

2010-11-15 Thread jimlux

Rex wrote:

On 11/14/2010 7:24 PM, David I. Emery wrote:


3. External reference LNBs with 10 MHz (pretty universal) going
up the cable that also carries power and brings the L band signal down.
I'm not entirely sure how many of these designs simply bandpass filter
and then limit the 10 MHz and use that directly as a PLL reference and
how many phase lock a VCXO to the 10 MHz coming in.  Otherwise similar
(and often  derived from designs for) the internal reference PLL types
in 2 above.

These ER types are more apt to be used for more exotic
specialized applications where very high frequency accuracy or some
degree of phase coherence  with other equipment or LNBs is useful.

Obviously with the high multiplication factor, one needs a quiet
reference inside the PLL bandwidth (and that is pretty wide to ensure
reliable lock) - one suspects that issues with degradation due to
mechanically induced noise and phase shift in the cables can be a
problem.



I picked up an LNB a about 10 years back that used this external 
reference method.  The LO in the thing was a DRO that locked to a 10 MHz 
signal coming up the cable. The LO in this one locked to 10.750 GHz. 
Experimenting, I found that the DRO adjustment screw could be turned and 
it would lock every 10 MHz. I found it would lock as low as 10.690. I 
assume it would tune up about that far too.


I needed an LO in the 10 GHz area, so I hacked mine to use it just as a 
LO, not using any of the receive chain. Here's a page where I described 
the LNB and what I did with it.


http://www.xertech.net/Projects/sat_lo.html

Maybe the description there will help someone. If nothing else, it show 
pictures of what one external ref type LNB looks like.




Interesting.. NORSAT makes lots of those sort of devices for VSAT (Very 
Small Aperture Terminal) applications (e.g. satellite internet)..  I've 
seen a few of them at work being used in that kind of application. 
Those would make life easier for my scheme.


They're not quite so common as the LNB for Ku-band TV (at least I've not 
seen them at Best Buy/Radio Shack kinds of places), nor have I seen them 
on neighbors houses or out at the curb on trash day.



But I'm starting to think the pilot tone technique might be easier... At 
first glance, if one considers two alternatives:


LO locked to reference, down converting  RF to baseband and digitizing

and
LO not locked, but with in-band pilot tone, down converting RF to 
baseband and digitizing, then essentially mixing with the downconverted 
pilot tone


should produce comparable results.  In the first, you're controlling the 
LO (at least inside the loop bandwidth), and in the second, you're 
really measuring it, then taking out its changes.


Assuming that the pilot tone amplitude is small enough that it doesn't 
cause nonlinearity problems in the LNB, and that it's in band, it should 
be comparable.



But, maybe there's a SNR of the reference issue?  In a PLL, you're 
comparing a very strong signal to a very strong reference, so the noise 
floor of both is very small, while in the pilot tone, the reference is 
strong, but not as strong, relative to the noise flor.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] ext ref LNB Re: ADEV

2010-11-15 Thread jimlux

Mike Feher wrote:

10 MHz locked LNBs do not use a separate connector. Everything goes down/up
the single main coax. The typical L-band down-converted frequency and the 10
MHz are easily separated, as is the DC. These are definitely not
inexpensive. Regards - Mike 





Ah.. but the question is really not whether the new price is cheap, 
but whether there's some reason why someone would be doing a massive 
refit, and dumping lots of these on the market surplus.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] ext ref LNB Re: ADEV

2010-11-15 Thread Mike Feher
Well, that I do not know. The majority of Ku  Ka LNBs for home TV use are
using free running DRO's. I have a bunch of them, and never ran across any
locked ones, except for some of the ones used for internet service. My real
experience is what we use in military satcom terminals at Ku and Ka bands,
with apertures from 0.6 to 9.2 meters, and they are all locked to an
external 10 MHz reference. I doubt if you will see any major dumping of
those. Especially now, because of strict ITAR. Even if one can buy it
directly from the manufacturer, once the military has owned it, they will
probably dispose of it in such a way that we will not see them on ebay.
Regards - Mike

Mike B. Feher, EOZ Inc.
89 Arnold Blvd.
Howell, NJ, 07731
732-886-5960 office
908-901-9193 cell


-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of jimlux
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 9:21 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: [time-nuts] ext ref LNB Re: ADEV

Mike Feher wrote:
 10 MHz locked LNBs do not use a separate connector. Everything goes
down/up
 the single main coax. The typical L-band down-converted frequency and the
10
 MHz are easily separated, as is the DC. These are definitely not
 inexpensive. Regards - Mike 
 


Ah.. but the question is really not whether the new price is cheap, 
but whether there's some reason why someone would be doing a massive 
refit, and dumping lots of these on the market surplus.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 10.23 MHz SC cut 10811 compatible crystals available

2010-11-15 Thread J.D. Bakker

Someone was asking about SC cut crystals to play with.
I have a few dozen 10.23 MHz SC cut crystals that are
interchangeable with 10811 10 MHz crystals, except for
the frequency difference.  They were made for a GPS
version of the 10811 that never saw the light of day.
Any interest in these?


Absolutely!

JDB.
[still working on that DIY GPSDO design]
--
LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. Free hardware design files.
http://www.lartmaker.nl/

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] ext ref LNB Re: ADEV

2010-11-15 Thread jimlux

Mike Feher wrote:

Well, that I do not know. The majority of Ku  Ka LNBs for home TV use are
using free running DRO's. I have a bunch of them, and never ran across any
locked ones, except for some of the ones used for internet service. My real
experience is what we use in military satcom terminals at Ku and Ka bands,
with apertures from 0.6 to 9.2 meters, and they are all locked to an
external 10 MHz reference. I doubt if you will see any major dumping of
those. Especially now, because of strict ITAR. Even if one can buy it
directly from the manufacturer, once the military has owned it, they will
probably dispose of it in such a way that we will not see them on ebay.
Regards - Mike



I doubt the LNB is export controlled.. It's unlikely to have an 
exotically low noise temperature, they're not cryogenic, they don't use 
components with dual-use, it's just part of a receiver.  If you go to 
the NORSAT website, for instance, they don't make much mention of export 
controls  (yeah, I'm sure the invoice/quote would have export 
boilerplate on it the contents of this have not been reviewed... use, 
sale, distribution may require license...)


http://www.norsat.com/lnb/blog

And I note that the datasheet's pretty sketchy on the external reference 
LNBs.. They give phase noise as follows (for Ku band, 10.75 GHz LO):

-75dBc/Hz @ 1kHz
-85 @ 10k
-95 @ 100k

But they don't say whether that's added to the reference noise, or 
that's the outside the loop noise, or what..


What's interesting is that the Ka-band LNB (for 18-19 GHz, which is low 
Ka, to my thinking.. I think 30 when I think Ka).. the noise is actually 
lower

-65 @ 1k
-75 @ 10k
-95 @ 100k
-100 @ 1M

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] ext ref LNB Re: ADEV

2010-11-15 Thread Mike Feher
The military Ka band is 20.2 to 21.2 on receive and 30 to 31 on transmit.
Norsat of course has been making these for about 15 years, one of the first.
Back when I was working on Milstar 25 years ago, with the same receive
frequency, even the NF was classified. No, it does not make sense, but, that
was the way it was. I just had to deal with some ITAR related issues, where,
COTS equipment is being used, yet, it is now built for, or owned by the
military, and, while the hardware is not classified, it is restricted, even
as to who may work on it. I am just saying, do not hold your breath to see
them coming on the military surplus market. Regards- Mike

Mike B. Feher, EOZ Inc.
89 Arnold Blvd.
Howell, NJ, 07731
732-886-5960 office
908-901-9193 cell


-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of jimlux
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 10:16 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] ext ref LNB Re: ADEV

Mike Feher wrote:
 Well, that I do not know. The majority of Ku  Ka LNBs for home TV use are
 using free running DRO's. I have a bunch of them, and never ran across any
 locked ones, except for some of the ones used for internet service. My
real
 experience is what we use in military satcom terminals at Ku and Ka bands,
 with apertures from 0.6 to 9.2 meters, and they are all locked to an
 external 10 MHz reference. I doubt if you will see any major dumping of
 those. Especially now, because of strict ITAR. Even if one can buy it
 directly from the manufacturer, once the military has owned it, they will
 probably dispose of it in such a way that we will not see them on ebay.
 Regards - Mike


I doubt the LNB is export controlled.. It's unlikely to have an 
exotically low noise temperature, they're not cryogenic, they don't use 
components with dual-use, it's just part of a receiver.  If you go to 
the NORSAT website, for instance, they don't make much mention of export 
controls  (yeah, I'm sure the invoice/quote would have export 
boilerplate on it the contents of this have not been reviewed... use, 
sale, distribution may require license...)

http://www.norsat.com/lnb/blog

And I note that the datasheet's pretty sketchy on the external reference 
LNBs.. They give phase noise as follows (for Ku band, 10.75 GHz LO):
-75dBc/Hz @ 1kHz
-85 @ 10k
-95 @ 100k

But they don't say whether that's added to the reference noise, or 
that's the outside the loop noise, or what..

What's interesting is that the Ka-band LNB (for 18-19 GHz, which is low 
Ka, to my thinking.. I think 30 when I think Ka).. the noise is actually 
lower
-65 @ 1k
-75 @ 10k
-95 @ 100k
-100 @ 1M

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 10.23 MHz SC cut 10811 compatible crystals available

2010-11-15 Thread k6rtm
Rick-- 

Sign me up for one. I'll even save you the postage! 

Bob K6RTM (down the street) 

-- 

Message: 2 
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:25:59 -0800 
From: Richard (Rick) Karlquist rich...@karlquist.com 
Subject: [time-nuts] 10.23 MHz SC cut 10811 compatible crystals 
available 
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
time-nuts@febo.com 
Message-ID: 4ce0c467.4020...@karlquist.com 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed 

Someone was asking about SC cut crystals to play with. 
I have a few dozen 10.23 MHz SC cut crystals that are 
interchangeable with 10811 10 MHz crystals, except for 
the frequency difference. They were made for a GPS 
version of the 10811 that never saw the light of day. 
Any interest in these? 

Rick Karlquist 
N6RK 




-- 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 5 and 10 MHz crystal filters

2010-11-15 Thread Dan Rae

On 11/15/2010 7:44 AM, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
I'd like to find a couple of 5.0 and/or 10.0 MHz crystal filters, 
preferably configured for use in-line with 50 ohm coax.


I've done some googling but don't find anyone selling these as a stock 
item.  Do they exist?  Any pointers would be appreciated.  
Used/surplus is fine (even preferable).
John, You don't say what width you require or any other details other 
than it should be 50 Ohm, but these are relatively easy to build in a 
ladder configuration with stock crystals. Google produces a lot of hits 
for crystal ladder filters; the first:

http://www.aade.com/filter32/dishal.htm

Dan

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Getting Started in High Precision Timing

2010-11-15 Thread Stanley Reynolds


I have been a software hacker for years but have never really done too
much hardware hacking.  I have been looking at oxco modules, but the
data sheets of various vendors do not really provide me with a good
basis as to what such an oscillator would provide me.  I assume its
just oscillation given the given frequency.  Do any of you all have
any good links/resources aside from what a basic google would provide,
as to how to get the data from the oscillator at a pulse-per-second
rate allowing me to do some basic timing.  Really, I'm just looking
for some first steps in hacking on these high-precision oscillators.

Matt,

Yes I'm sure many on this list have large collections information but you would 
need to be very specific to receive an answer, make, model, and which spec. 
Several projects can be found in the list archives for dividing the oxco rate 
to 
the PPS rate. Check the TAPR web site for a TADD-2 PPS divider. In general you 
accumulate all sorts of lab grade test equipment or make your own equipment to 
measure the output. The catch 22 is you need a better reference to measure a 
unknown device. Most start with GPSDO and a Time Interval Counter / Frequency 
Counter a way to log your data to process on a computer is good unless you want 
to go old school with pen and paper and stop watch ;-)

Stanley

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 5 and 10 MHz crystal filters

2010-11-15 Thread Alan Melia
Hi John I have a collection of filters but I have not seen any common ones
at those frequencies with 50 ohm termination. The characteristic would
probably require transformer input and output coupling, the inherent
impedance of most filers in this frequency range will be around 1kohm. The
narrower the lower the impedance.

Those crystal frequencies are available relatively cheaply it should be
possible to make a ladder filter with some form of matching to 50 ohms quite
simply. There are lots of references around (the recent QEX has on on
overtone crystals, but does reference some of the articles on fundamental
crystal filters.)

Alan G3NYK

- Original Message - 
From: John Ackermann N8UR j...@febo.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 3:44 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] 5 and 10 MHz crystal filters


 I'd like to find a couple of 5.0 and/or 10.0 MHz crystal filters,
 preferably configured for use in-line with 50 ohm coax.

 I've done some googling but don't find anyone selling these as a stock
 item.  Do they exist?  Any pointers would be appreciated.  Used/surplus
 is fine (even preferable).

 Thanks!

 John

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Temperature sensors and bridge amps

2010-11-15 Thread Javier Herrero

And more important... they do not consume power continuously ;)

Regards,

Javier

El 15/11/2010 20:18, Alan Melia escribió:

Maybe the same things Harry ?? The advantage of latching relays is that they
maintain the position (EFC) if you lose the command link. You cant hear the
clicks in Space
  :-))
Alan
G3NYK
- Original Message -
From: Harry Brownharryhbr...@earthlink.net
To:rich...@karlquist.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency
measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Temperature sensors and bridge amps



Back in the early 80's I was working for a company making military
communication satellites.

The 5 MHz Oscillators used on the satellite were in a double oven keeping
the oven temp within 0.001 Hz C.

We could adjust the oscillator frequency for aging by ground commanding a
bank of relays controlled a D/A converter to adjust  the oscillator
frequency.

Lots of fun back then.

  Any idea what is used now?

73, Harry, W3IIT

- Original Message -
From: Richard Karlquistrich...@karlquist.com
To:time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Temperature sensors and bridge amps



The HP E9183A achieved 1 millidegree over -55 to +85C
in a single oven. The time lag was dealt with by adding
a double integrator to PID.

Rick Karlquist N6RK

On Fri 12/11/10 8:26 AM , Bill Hawkins  wrote:

in the heater control loop. Of course, you can't get to a
millidegree from ambient with just one oven. And you can't
eliminate time lags if you have any thermal mass.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to

https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.




--

Javier HerreroEMAIL: jherr...@hvsistemas.com
Chief Technology Officer
HV Sistemas S.L.  PHONE: +34 949 336 806
Los Charcones, 17 FAX:   +34 949 336 792
19170 El Casar - Guadalajara - Spain  WEB: http://www.hvsistemas.com


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] D/M picture

2010-11-15 Thread paul swed
Looks very nice Bert

On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 3:26 PM, ewkeh...@aol.com wrote:



 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 5 and 10 MHz crystal filters

2010-11-15 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist

A friendly warning about crystal filters.  Crystals, whether
used in an oscillator or filter, have intrinsic phase noise.
You cannot improve the phase noise of a crystal oscillator
with a crystal filter unless the filter crystals have lower
phase noise than the oscillator crystals.  In general, post
filtering of an oscillator is rarely done for the reasons
I mentioned.  One place where it made sense was in the HP
8662 with the 640 MHz output option where a 10811 is multiplied to 80
MHz and then filtered to reduce the noise floor.  It is further
multiplied to 640 MHz and filtered again by a SAW filter,
that was made at HP in those days.  As others have mentioned,
filter characteristic impedance is a function of the crystal
physics.  There is a specific impedance that you must use for
a given bandwidth.  Fortunately, it is easy to put transformers
at the ports to convert to 50 ohms.

Rick Karlquist
N6RK

On 11/15/2010 7:44 AM, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:

I'd like to find a couple of 5.0 and/or 10.0 MHz crystal filters,
preferably configured for use in-line with 50 ohm coax.

I've done some googling but don't find anyone selling these as a stock
item. Do they exist? Any pointers would be appreciated. Used/surplus is
fine (even preferable).

Thanks!

John

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 5 and 10 MHz crystal filters

2010-11-15 Thread Mike Feher
Rick -

Unless I  misunderstood, I do not believe what you said is correct. A
crystal filter  can indeed improve the far out phase noise of a crystal
oscillator. The oscillator's noise is not only a function of the crystal,
but, the combination of the crystal noise and the amplifier noise used for
feedback and the Q of that circuit. All of those additional components
degrade crystal noise. Consequently, a 100 Hz wide filter at 10 MHz can
really do a nice job on just a decent 10 MHz oscillator. Lincoln Labs proved
this in their EDM of a satcom system in the early 80's that then I took over
in industry to replicate and improve in 1986. We did have a 10 MHz crystal
filter in there for cleanup. In our application, the final transmit
frequency was close to 45 GHz, and it needed to be very clean, even after an
optimal architecture used to get us up there. 73 - Mike 

Mike B. Feher, EOZ Inc.
89 Arnold Blvd.
Howell, NJ, 07731
732-886-5960 office
908-901-9193 cell


-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Richard (Rick) Karlquist
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 4:44 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 5 and 10 MHz crystal filters

A friendly warning about crystal filters.  Crystals, whether
used in an oscillator or filter, have intrinsic phase noise.
You cannot improve the phase noise of a crystal oscillator
with a crystal filter unless the filter crystals have lower
phase noise than the oscillator crystals.  In general, post
filtering of an oscillator is rarely done for the reasons
I mentioned.  One place where it made sense was in the HP
8662 with the 640 MHz output option where a 10811 is multiplied to 80
MHz and then filtered to reduce the noise floor.  It is further
multiplied to 640 MHz and filtered again by a SAW filter,
that was made at HP in those days.  As others have mentioned,
filter characteristic impedance is a function of the crystal
physics.  There is a specific impedance that you must use for
a given bandwidth.  Fortunately, it is easy to put transformers
at the ports to convert to 50 ohms.

Rick Karlquist
N6RK

On 11/15/2010 7:44 AM, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
 I'd like to find a couple of 5.0 and/or 10.0 MHz crystal filters,
 preferably configured for use in-line with 50 ohm coax.

 I've done some googling but don't find anyone selling these as a stock
 item. Do they exist? Any pointers would be appreciated. Used/surplus is
 fine (even preferable).

 Thanks!

 John

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 5 and 10 MHz crystal filters

2010-11-15 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
I hadn't considered phase noise, thanks for bringing that up!  I know tempo can 
also be an issue with high Q filters.

These aren't significant issues for my current application, which is to clean 
up a synthesizer running at a slight offset from the nominal 10.000 MHz 
frequency.  So I'm starting with much more noise than an OCXO.

John 

On Nov 15, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist rich...@karlquist.com 
wrote:

 A friendly warning about crystal filters.  Crystals, whether
 used in an oscillator or filter, have intrinsic phase noise.
 You cannot improve the phase noise of a crystal oscillator
 with a crystal filter unless the filter crystals have lower
 phase noise than the oscillator crystals.  In general, post
 filtering of an oscillator is rarely done for the reasons
 I mentioned.  One place where it made sense was in the HP
 8662 with the 640 MHz output option where a 10811 is multiplied to 80
 MHz and then filtered to reduce the noise floor.  It is further
 multiplied to 640 MHz and filtered again by a SAW filter,
 that was made at HP in those days.  As others have mentioned,
 filter characteristic impedance is a function of the crystal
 physics.  There is a specific impedance that you must use for
 a given bandwidth.  Fortunately, it is easy to put transformers
 at the ports to convert to 50 ohms.
 
 Rick Karlquist
 N6RK
 
 On 11/15/2010 7:44 AM, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
 I'd like to find a couple of 5.0 and/or 10.0 MHz crystal filters,
 preferably configured for use in-line with 50 ohm coax.
 
 I've done some googling but don't find anyone selling these as a stock
 item. Do they exist? Any pointers would be appreciated. Used/surplus is
 fine (even preferable).
 
 Thanks!
 
 John
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP 3048A Phase Noise Measurement System Accessories / Options

2010-11-15 Thread Adrian

John,
   

Hi,

recently I added a nice 11848A phase noise interface to the herd.

It came with the options K23 (DC Blocking Filter) and K21 (AM Detector
Filter), including the complete set of adapters, manuals and matching /
calibration networks.
If anyone is interested, I'll be happy to scan the manuals. I think
these are not yet out on the web.
 

I've uploaded my cal, ops, and ref manual scans to http://www.hparchive.com
(see the Equipment link under '3048A' near the bottom of the page), as well
as two different editions of the 11848A service manual, but I don't think
I've seen any schematics for the various option modules.  Would be good to
add those to the page.
   


PM sent with the K23 DC blocking filter manual.
I'll scan the K21 AM detector filter, too.

   

Another interesting detail: The 11848A has options 201, 300 and H26. H26
appears to denote the opt 201 microwave phase detector with extended
frequency range to 26.5 GHz (with male 3.5 connectors on the front
panel). I've never seen that option before. I have no idea what 300
stands for though.
 

Sounds like a nice box.  Did it come with any software?  Since option 301
was the MS-DOS version, maybe 300 refers to another software option,
possibly a customer-specific mod to support the 26.5 GHz mixer.
   


It came in near mint condition with two original accessory boxes 
containing the options and the 'Series 200/300 Rev. A.03.02 (Compiled 
for RMBUX)' software.


   

I would appreciate to hear about any other options and accessories for
the 3048A / 11848A that are not covered by the common manuals.

Btw. are there any known projects to run the 3048A on HP/Agilent VEE or
other nowadays environments?
 

Not on VEE, but you can run it under the Transera HTBasic emulator
(including the free trial version) using this modified version:
http://www.ke5fx.com/3048A_X01.zip .  (I'm not the author but I can probably
help you get it running if you have any trouble, since I've used it
heavily.)

-- john, KE5FX
   


Many thanks!

I have a working 3048A with the MS-DOS version, but would be happy to 
run it on a PC that can be connected to my network.

So, the Transera solution sounds like a plan! Thank you very much!

Nevertheless, if anyone has de-embedded the instrument control and 
calibration sequences, that would be great for more experimentation.


Adrian



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

   



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP 3048A Phase Noise Measurement System Accessories / Options

2010-11-15 Thread John Miles

 PM sent with the K23 DC blocking filter manual.
 I'll scan the K21 AM detector filter, too.

It hasn't shown up -- it might've been too big to email.  Anything over a
couple MB should go to jmiles (at) gmail.com, with a note to jmiles (at)
pop.net to let me know you sent it.

 I have a working 3048A with the MS-DOS version, but would be happy to
 run it on a PC that can be connected to my network.
 So, the Transera solution sounds like a plan! Thank you very much!

 Nevertheless, if anyone has de-embedded the instrument control and
 calibration sequences, that would be great for more experimentation.

I started down that path (see http://www.ke5fx.com/11848a.htm) but didn't
end up pursuing it very far before getting distracted with other things...

-- john, KE5FX



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Temperature sensors and bridge amps

2010-11-15 Thread jimlux

Harry Brown wrote:
Back in the early 80's I was working for a company making military 
communication satellites.


The 5 MHz Oscillators used on the satellite were in a double oven 
keeping the oven temp within 0.001 Hz C.


We could adjust the oscillator frequency for aging by ground commanding 
a bank of relays controlled a D/A converter to adjust  the oscillator 
frequency.


Lots of fun back then.

Any idea what is used now?


there's a variety of oscillators used on satellites these days. It kind 
of depends on the specific application.  For science satellites, a lot 
of stuff is done with two way ranging, so the onboard oscillator only 
needs to be good enough to allow it to acquire the signal from earth.


TCXOs are good for the 0.5 ppm sort of performance. Nice and low power.
OCXOs are somewhat better, at the cost of more power consumption
USOs (a OCXO in a vacuum bottle, with a very fancy crystal and 
electronics) are used where very good performance is needed.  ppb per 
year stability over time, 1E-12 over temp,  but volumes around a liter, 
mass around 0.5 kg and powers around a watt


There's development of a trapped mercury ion clock underway, which 
should improve performance by several orders of magnitude.


There are also flight qualified Rb and Cs sources being used, on GPS 
satellites among others.


There's also experimental stuff with disciplining non tcxo oscillators 
against GPS and similar schemes.  That should get performances 
comparable to other terrestrial GPSDOs



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Temperature sensors and bridge amps

2010-11-15 Thread jimlux

Bill Hawkins wrote:

Harry,

What's the ambient temperature swing for the outer oven in space? 


Bill Hawkins



That would depend (a lot) on the thermal design of the spacecraft.  We 
typically design for a temperature range of -20C to +70C, but we don't 
expect to see anywhere near that sort of variation on orbit.  That range 
is more to make sure it works every time.


A piece of equipment on a typical LEO satellite might see 5-10 degree 
variations in temperature at the baseplate during the 100 minute 
revolution, depending on where the orbit is relative to the sun (if you 
go in and out of eclipse, the variations are bigger).  A lot of 
satellites have smaller variations on a hour to hour basis, but might 
have a 5-10 degree change over the seasons.


Radios on Mars rovers and the like see pretty big temperature 
fluctuations between night and day (many tens of degrees C), although, 
again, specifics of design make a difference.  For instance, if you've 
got enough battery, you can run heaters during the night. 
RHU(Radioactive Heating Units) help limit the minimum temperature.


On deep space, the temperature fluctuations are very small.. solar 
loading is pretty constant, attitude is usually kept the same, etc. The 
changes are when different instruments are turned on and off, or if you 
change attitude to point a sensor somewhere.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.