[time-nuts] New PIC frequency dividers

2013-02-07 Thread Tom Van Baak
Over the past year many people have asked for special features in those cute 
little 8-pin PDIP PIC divider chips that I play with and use in my lab.

I've updated the web page: http://leapsecond.com/pic/picdiv.htm

There are now close to 20 different versions. Here's a partial list:

 PD03 -- 4-pin 10^3 frequency divider (10 MHz to 10 kHz)
 PD04 -- 4-pin 10^4 frequency divider (10 MHz to 1 kHz)
 PD05 -- 4-pin 10^5 frequency divider (10 MHz to 100 Hz)
 PD06 -- 4-pin 10^6 frequency divider (10 MHz to 10 Hz)
 PD07 -- 4-pin 10^7 frequency divider (10 MHz to 1 Hz)
 PD08 -- 4-pin 5x10^6 frequency divider (5 MHz to 1 Hz)
 PD09 -- 4-pin 10 MHz to 1PPS frequency divider (20 us pulse)
 PD10 -- 4-pin 10 MHz to 1PPS frequency divider (10 ms pulse)
 PD11 -- 10 MHz to 1PPS frequency divider (3 pulse widths), with sync
 PD12 -- 5 MHz to 1PPS frequency divider (3 pulse widths), with sync
 PD13 -- 10 MHz to three frequencies divider (1-10-100 Hz), with sync
 PD14 -- 5 MHz to three frequencies divider (1-10-100 Hz), with sync
 PD15 -- 10 MHz to three frequencies divider (1-1k-10k Hz), with sync
 PD16 -- 5/10 MHz to four frequencies divider (1-10-100-1000 Hz)
 PD17 -- 1/2.5/5/10 MHz to 1PPS frequency divider (100 ms), with sync
 PD18 -- 1/2.5/5/10 MHz to 1PPS frequency divider (10 ms), with sync
 PD26 -- 10 MHz to 1PPS frequency divider, with sync and microstep

Note these are all compatible with the TAPR T2-mini board (which comes with a 
PD17).

/tvb
http://leapsecond.com/pic/
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] HP53132A vs SR625

2013-02-07 Thread Hui Zhang
Dear Group:


I am intend to buy a second-hand counter, I have not decided yet between 
SR625 and HP53132A, they have very close price in surplus market of here, so, 
which is better choice? Any suggestion will be appreciated.


Best Regards!


Hui Zhang
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Nifty MINI TIC for DMTD

2013-02-07 Thread Jeroen Bastemeijer

Dear Bert,

Thank you for the update! And a peek into the kitchen ;-)

I guess the SMD board you mention is assembled. But I think there are 
people who are interested in bare boards as well


Good luck and best regards, Jeroen

On 02/06/2013 05:01 PM, ewkeh...@aol.com wrote:

The delay is mainly do to the fact that the promise to do the drawings did
not materialize. The counters are done and tests on variations of the D/M's
are  ongoing since the noise floor is not the counter but the D/M.
Bill Riley's boards are out there and it would be nice to get some feedback
  on test results, also I have explored the possibility of some one
manufacturing  the board. A time nut is in the business and will be able to 
supply
the SMD  version of the board for $160 plus shipping if a minimum volume of
20 get  ordered. As to D/M four options will be available starting with
Bill's  PCB.
I have 4 kits of my D/M and counters available and will work with some that
  have the proper OCXO's and willingness to test with Time Lab since tests
with  Stable 32 and Ulrich's A/V software is ongoing. If interested please
contact me  off list
Recent tests by Corby has convinced me that with the four channel counter
not only cross correlation but also three corner hat is doable with one
dual mixer. The offset oscillator has to be also of high quality.
Some of the delays are due  to visitors over the holidays but also the
fact that the D/M project is not the only one. Of equal or more importance is a
  home standard that can get close to a Maser using GPS Rb and the best OCXO
  in the house.On the D/M the only work for us is packaging and display PIC
programming. Latest set of boards were ordered yesterday. The display is a
nice feature but not necessary.
I hope we will have the drawings in about 10 days.
Bert Kehren
  
  
In a message dated 2/6/2013 4:15:33 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,

j.bastemei...@tudelft.nl writes:

Dear  all,

! Did I miss something, or are we all waiting for more info to  be
published on this system? I checked KO4BB site, but I couldn't find any
new info on this project. An update would be appreciated!

Note:  This message is written with a positive intent, not as a  complaint!

Thank you, best regards,  Jeroen
___
time-nuts mailing  list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP53132A vs SR625

2013-02-07 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

The SR625 is a SR620 with a rubidium time base. If the Rb is in good shape,
and you don't have a house standard, then that's a significant plus. 

Bob

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Hui Zhang
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 9:43 AM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] HP53132A vs SR625

Dear Group:


I am intend to buy a second-hand counter, I have not decided yet between
SR625 and HP53132A, they have very close price in surplus market of here,
so, which is better choice? Any suggestion will be appreciated.


Best Regards!


Hui Zhang
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Nifty MINI TIC for DMTD

2013-02-07 Thread ewkehren
You can buy today the Bill Riley board and there are few boards of a change 
with larger SMD also today available. Once we release a final S M D version any 
one that wants to buy only a board that ia an option, the same will also be 
available in through hole.
Bert




Sent from Samsung tabletJeroen Bastemeijer j.bastemei...@tudelft.nl 
wrote:Dear Bert,

Thank you for the update! And a peek into the kitchen ;-)

I guess the SMD board you mention is assembled. But I think there are 
people who are interested in bare boards as well

Good luck and best regards, Jeroen

On 02/06/2013 05:01 PM, ewkeh...@aol.com wrote:
 The delay is mainly do to the fact that the promise to do the drawings did
 not materialize. The counters are done and tests on variations of the D/M's
 are  ongoing since the noise floor is not the counter but the D/M.
 Bill Riley's boards are out there and it would be nice to get some feedback
   on test results, also I have explored the possibility of some one
 manufacturing  the board. A time nut is in the business and will be able to 
 supply
 the SMD  version of the board for $160 plus shipping if a minimum volume of
 20 get  ordered. As to D/M four options will be available starting with
 Bill's  PCB.
 I have 4 kits of my D/M and counters available and will work with some that
   have the proper OCXO's and willingness to test with Time Lab since tests
 with  Stable 32 and Ulrich's A/V software is ongoing. If interested please
 contact me  off list
 Recent tests by Corby has convinced me that with the four channel counter
 not only cross correlation but also three corner hat is doable with one
 dual mixer. The offset oscillator has to be also of high quality.
 Some of the delays are due  to visitors over the holidays but also the
 fact that the D/M project is not the only one. Of equal or more importance is 
 a
   home standard that can get close to a Maser using GPS Rb and the best OCXO
   in the house.On the D/M the only work for us is packaging and display PIC
 programming. Latest set of boards were ordered yesterday. The display is a
 nice feature but not necessary.
 I hope we will have the drawings in about 10 days.
 Bert Kehren
   
   
 In a message dated 2/6/2013 4:15:33 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
 j.bastemei...@tudelft.nl writes:

 Dear  all,

 ! Did I miss something, or are we all waiting for more info to  be
 published on this system? I checked KO4BB site, but I couldn't find any
 new info on this project. An update would be appreciated!

 Note:  This message is written with a positive intent, not as a  complaint!

 Thank you, best regards,  Jeroen
 ___
 time-nuts mailing  list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the  instructions there.

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] HP53132A vs SR625

2013-02-07 Thread Azelio Boriani
The SR625 at the same price of the HP53132A: either the HP is overvalued or
the SR625 is a real bargain...

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:

 Hi

 The SR625 is a SR620 with a rubidium time base. If the Rb is in good shape,
 and you don't have a house standard, then that's a significant plus.

 Bob

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of Hui Zhang
 Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 9:43 AM
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: [time-nuts] HP53132A vs SR625

 Dear Group:


 I am intend to buy a second-hand counter, I have not decided yet
 between
 SR625 and HP53132A, they have very close price in surplus market of here,
 so, which is better choice? Any suggestion will be appreciated.


 Best Regards!


 Hui Zhang
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP53132A vs SR625

2013-02-07 Thread Volker Esper


If the SR is in good shape I would prefer the SR. I love my one not only 
for it's technical data but also for the way of operation. Less menues, 
more controls, logically arranged.


Volker


Am 07.02.2013 17:53, schrieb Azelio Boriani:

The SR625 at the same price of the HP53132A: either the HP is overvalued or
the SR625 is a real bargain...

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Bob Campli...@rtty.us  wrote:

   

Hi

The SR625 is a SR620 with a rubidium time base. If the Rb is in good shape,
and you don't have a house standard, then that's a significant plus.

Bob

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Hui Zhang
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 9:43 AM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] HP53132A vs SR625

Dear Group:


 I am intend to buy a second-hand counter, I have not decided yet
between
SR625 and HP53132A, they have very close price in surplus market of here,
so, which is better choice? Any suggestion will be appreciated.


Best Regards!


Hui Zhang
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


   



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP53132A vs SR625

2013-02-07 Thread paul swed
Hui
Well given what you have shared for information neither answer is right or
wrong better or worse. The question that we would need answered to be
helpful is how will you use it. What price are you willing to pay. There
are tradeoffs. I am not an expert. I have many HP counters that I like
well. I have SRS equipment thats equally very fine. I do not have a SRS 620
or 625. But if I ever see one at a really good price. (Really cheap) I
would buy it, even if broken.
Regards
Paul

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Volker Esper ail...@t-online.de wrote:


 If the SR is in good shape I would prefer the SR. I love my one not only
 for it's technical data but also for the way of operation. Less menues,
 more controls, logically arranged.

 Volker


 Am 07.02.2013 17:53, schrieb Azelio Boriani:

  The SR625 at the same price of the HP53132A: either the HP is overvalued
 or
 the SR625 is a real bargain...

 On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Bob Campli...@rtty.us  wrote:



 Hi

 The SR625 is a SR620 with a rubidium time base. If the Rb is in good
 shape,
 and you don't have a house standard, then that's a significant plus.

 Bob

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com 
 [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@**febo.comtime-nuts-boun...@febo.com]
 On
 Behalf Of Hui Zhang
 Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 9:43 AM
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: [time-nuts] HP53132A vs SR625

 Dear Group:


  I am intend to buy a second-hand counter, I have not decided yet
 between
 SR625 and HP53132A, they have very close price in surplus market of here,
 so, which is better choice? Any suggestion will be appreciated.


 Best Regards!


 Hui Zhang
 __**_
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


 __**_
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



 __**_
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
 mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.






 __**_
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
 mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP53132A vs SR625

2013-02-07 Thread Brooke Clarke

Hi Hui:

The HP 53132A is called a Universal Frequency Counter can count frequency at 12 digits per second, but that is not the 
case when it is measuring time intervals.  The human interface might be called user hostile.


The front panel of the SR 620 is marked Universal Time Interval Counter and is great for making time interval 
measurements. That's why I traded my 53132 for the SR620. http://www.prc68.com/I/TandFTE.shtml#SR620


If you're doing Time Nuts measurements you probably have a good 10 MHz oscillator that you can feed into either of these 
counters so getting an optional time base in one of them serves little purpose.


Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html

Hui Zhang wrote:

Dear Group:


 I am intend to buy a second-hand counter, I have not decided yet between 
SR625 and HP53132A, they have very close price in surplus market of here, so, 
which is better choice? Any suggestion will be appreciated.


Best Regards!


Hui Zhang
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP53132A vs SR625

2013-02-07 Thread Magnus Danielson

On 02/07/2013 07:43 PM, Volker Esper wrote:


If the SR is in good shape I would prefer the SR. I love my one not only
for it's technical data but also for the way of operation. Less menues,
more controls, logically arranged.


I tend to agree here.

The HP/Agilent 53132A lacks the ease of use aspect that older HP 
counters had. It has better performance than many of the older, but not 
all. The SR620/625 has (if in good condition) better performance than 
the 53132A.


These days I have both.

Cheers,
Magnus


Volker


Am 07.02.2013 17:53, schrieb Azelio Boriani:

The SR625 at the same price of the HP53132A: either the HP is
overvalued or
the SR625 is a real bargain...

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Bob Campli...@rtty.us wrote:


Hi

The SR625 is a SR620 with a rubidium time base. If the Rb is in good
shape,
and you don't have a house standard, then that's a significant plus.

Bob

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Hui Zhang
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 9:43 AM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] HP53132A vs SR625

Dear Group:


I am intend to buy a second-hand counter, I have not decided yet
between
SR625 and HP53132A, they have very close price in surplus market of
here,
so, which is better choice? Any suggestion will be appreciated.


Best Regards!


Hui Zhang
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Nifty MINI TIC for DMTD

2013-02-07 Thread Don Latham
through hole forever :-)
Don of the old hands and blurred vision :-)

ewkehren
 You can buy today the Bill Riley board and there are few boards of a
 change with larger SMD also today available. Once we release a final S M
 D version any one that wants to buy only a board that ia an option, the
 same will also be available in through hole.
 Bert




 Sent from Samsung tabletJeroen Bastemeijer j.bastemei...@tudelft.nl
 wrote:Dear Bert,

 Thank you for the update! And a peek into the kitchen ;-)

 I guess the SMD board you mention is assembled. But I think there are
 people who are interested in bare boards as well

 Good luck and best regards, Jeroen

 On 02/06/2013 05:01 PM, ewkeh...@aol.com wrote:
 The delay is mainly do to the fact that the promise to do the drawings
 did
 not materialize. The counters are done and tests on variations of the
 D/M's
 are  ongoing since the noise floor is not the counter but the D/M.
 Bill Riley's boards are out there and it would be nice to get some
 feedback
   on test results, also I have explored the possibility of some one
 manufacturing  the board. A time nut is in the business and will be
 able to supply
 the SMD  version of the board for $160 plus shipping if a minimum
 volume of
 20 get  ordered. As to D/M four options will be available starting
 with
 Bill's  PCB.
 I have 4 kits of my D/M and counters available and will work with some
 that
   have the proper OCXO's and willingness to test with Time Lab since
 tests
 with  Stable 32 and Ulrich's A/V software is ongoing. If interested
 please
 contact me  off list
 Recent tests by Corby has convinced me that with the four channel
 counter
 not only cross correlation but also three corner hat is doable with
 one
 dual mixer. The offset oscillator has to be also of high quality.
 Some of the delays are due  to visitors over the holidays but also
 the
 fact that the D/M project is not the only one. Of equal or more
 importance is a
   home standard that can get close to a Maser using GPS Rb and the
 best OCXO
   in the house.On the D/M the only work for us is packaging and
 display PIC
 programming. Latest set of boards were ordered yesterday. The display
 is a
 nice feature but not necessary.
 I hope we will have the drawings in about 10 days.
 Bert Kehren
  
  
 In a message dated 2/6/2013 4:15:33 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
 j.bastemei...@tudelft.nl writes:

 Dear  all,

 ! Did I miss something, or are we all waiting for more info to  be
 published on this system? I checked KO4BB site, but I couldn't find
 any
 new info on this project. An update would be appreciated!

 Note:  This message is written with a positive intent, not as a 
 complaint!

 Thank you, best regards,  Jeroen
 ___
 time-nuts mailing  list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the  instructions there.

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



-- 
Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument
are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind.
De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century.
If you don't know what it is, don't poke it.
Ghost in the Shell


Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP53132A vs SR625

2013-02-07 Thread Hui Zhang
Hello Dear Group:


I am very glad to see so many replies in the morning, and I am very 
grateful to every time nuts gave me useful information, your proposal has 
strengthened my determination, in fact, I am also very like SR625, So I will to 
find and buy a good shape SR625 for my new time interval measure instrument.


Thanks again for everyone's advice, which is very useful to make a choice for 
me. Sorry for not reply everyone's mail. 


Best Regards!


Hui Zhang












At 2013-02-08 05:12:37,Brooke Clarke bro...@pacific.net wrote:
Hi Hui:

The HP 53132A is called a Universal Frequency Counter can count frequency at 
12 digits per second, but that is not the 
case when it is measuring time intervals.  The human interface might be called 
user hostile.

The front panel of the SR 620 is marked Universal Time Interval Counter and 
is great for making time interval 
measurements. That's why I traded my 53132 for the SR620. 
http://www.prc68.com/I/TandFTE.shtml#SR620

If you're doing Time Nuts measurements you probably have a good 10 MHz 
oscillator that you can feed into either of these 
counters so getting an optional time base in one of them serves little purpose.

Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html

Hui Zhang wrote:
 Dear Group:


  I am intend to buy a second-hand counter, I have not decided yet 
 between SR625 and HP53132A, they have very close price in surplus market of 
 here, so, which is better choice? Any suggestion will be appreciated.


 Best Regards!


 Hui Zhang
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Nifty MINI TIC for DMTD

2013-02-07 Thread Robert Darlington
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Don Latham d...@montana.com wrote:

 through hole forever :-)
 Don of the old hands and blurred vision :-)

 ewkehren



I grew out of thru-hole about 10 years ago.  My nearly 40 year old eyes
have trouble reading the numbers on 0603 parts for the past few years, but
it's amazingly easy under a stereo microscope.  Much faster to stuff boards
with surface mount parts since I don't need to keep flipping them over and
cutting leads.  Even folks with very shaky hands can solder up tiny surface
mount parts.  The brain is an amazing PID controller.  Using a microscope
at 30x means your hands shake at about 1/30th of what they did before.

-Bob
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP53132A vs SR625

2013-02-07 Thread SAIDJACK
Hui,
 
rent one of each if you can before you make your choice. I have both, and  
the HP unit is much easier to use once you know which button sequence to 
push to  get more than just Frequency/Time-Interval type measurements - these 
can be  single-button events on the HP unit.
 
Even offsetting and normalizing frequencies becomes very easy after a  
couple of days of using the unit, there is no setting that takes me longer than 
 
about 5 seconds to set up, so while not perfect, the user interface can be  
learned easily. I find the SR620 to have too many buttons(!) I always find  
myself searching for just that one button. Anyways, more buttons are just 
more  things that can fail. If you are a pilot, and have used a Garmin 430W  
GPS in your life, then the HP user interface is no challenge whatsoever and  
seems very easy to use..
 
The SR-620 has it's advantages, especially when you just do one single type 
 of measurement, but for me it has a huge number of disadvantages, and I 
mostly  use the 53132A for that reason:
 
1) I paid quite a bit of money and I had it calibrated and fixed by SRS,  
and it still exhibits a significant frequency offset with a perfect 
reference  and perfect DUT!!!
 
SRS says a small frequency error is normal, well that prevents me from  
using the unit as a frequency counter, for me it's only useful as a relative  
display frequency counter. HP doesn't have such a frequency error, so no  
worries there.
 
2) The SRS unit is s loud that it's totally annoying and unacceptable  
for long measurements. Many folks reported this here before. It's just bad.  
Whining like crazy.
 
3) The SRS unit is 19 wide, huge, heavy, and clunky. I need my  counter 
portable, only the HP unit will do
 
4) The SRS unit has a much lower MTBF because of all the parts inside, and  
it needs finicky adjustments, see item 1) above. The HP unit either works, 
or is  just dead. Not much to adjust. Different technology generation. And 
the coolness  factor: a nice florescent tube display is so much more modern 
looking than those  clunky old 7-segment LED's..
 
5) The SRS unit is usually $1000 more than the HP unit, and you don't know  
how good the unit is you are buying because of all of the calibration 
stuff.  Usually there is no hit-or-miss issue with the HP units, they either 
work, or  are dead.
 
That said, the HP unit doesn't measure well at 10MHz, so I mostly use a  
divide-by-two to get one more digit of resolution out of it, and it's time  
interval resolution is not as good as the SR620. But for time interval  
measurements I use a Wavecrest DTS unit that blows the SR620 and the HP out  of 
the water anyways..
 
Bye,
Said
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 2/7/2013 16:39:04 Pacific Standard Time, ba...@163.com  
writes:

Hello  Dear Group:


I am very glad to see so many replies in  the morning, and I am very 
grateful to every time nuts gave me useful  information, your proposal has 
strengthened my determination, in fact, I am  also very like SR625, So I will 
to 
find and buy a good shape SR625 for my new  time interval measure instrument.


Thanks again for everyone's  advice, which is very useful to make a choice 
for me. Sorry for not reply  everyone's mail. 


Best Regards!


Hui  Zhang


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP53132A vs SR625

2013-02-07 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

Normally a 625 is priced above a 620. Rubidium standards have a finite life. 
You are paying for the Rb when you buy a 625. If the Rb is worn out or nearly 
at end of life, the 625 is not a good idea.

Bob

On Feb 7, 2013, at 7:22 PM, Hui Zhang ba...@163.com wrote:

 Hello Dear Group:
 
 
I am very glad to see so many replies in the morning, and I am very 
 grateful to every time nuts gave me useful information, your proposal has 
 strengthened my determination, in fact, I am also very like SR625, So I will 
 to find and buy a good shape SR625 for my new time interval measure 
 instrument.
 
 
 Thanks again for everyone's advice, which is very useful to make a choice for 
 me. Sorry for not reply everyone's mail. 
 
 
 Best Regards!
 
 
 Hui Zhang
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 At 2013-02-08 05:12:37,Brooke Clarke bro...@pacific.net wrote:
 Hi Hui:
 
 The HP 53132A is called a Universal Frequency Counter can count frequency 
 at 12 digits per second, but that is not the 
 case when it is measuring time intervals.  The human interface might be 
 called user hostile.
 
 The front panel of the SR 620 is marked Universal Time Interval Counter 
 and is great for making time interval 
 measurements. That's why I traded my 53132 for the SR620. 
 http://www.prc68.com/I/TandFTE.shtml#SR620
 
 If you're doing Time Nuts measurements you probably have a good 10 MHz 
 oscillator that you can feed into either of these 
 counters so getting an optional time base in one of them serves little 
 purpose.
 
 Have Fun,
 
 Brooke Clarke
 http://www.PRC68.com
 http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
 
 Hui Zhang wrote:
 Dear Group:
 
 
 I am intend to buy a second-hand counter, I have not decided yet 
 between SR625 and HP53132A, they have very close price in surplus market of 
 here, so, which is better choice? Any suggestion will be appreciated.
 
 
 Best Regards!
 
 
 Hui Zhang
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.