Re: [time-nuts] GPDSO is working

2013-07-13 Thread Chris Albertson

 Whoever programmed the PIC in question inverted the signal for some
 reason.  There should be no need for an inverter to use the MAX232
 devices, they knew what they were doing when they designed them.


If you have an inverted TTL serial signal then you can connect it straight
to n RS-232 port and there is a very good change it will just work.  They
call it TTL level RS-232.   BUt if you want to reliable drive a long
cable it is best to level convert to true RS-232.   But today most re-232
is actually using zero and five volts.
-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Nortel/Thunderbolt questions

2013-07-13 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

I believe what you have here is a Trimble / Nortel box rather than a TBolt - is 
this correct?

If so there are a number of differences in what you can and can't do with LH. 
Also since it's a different design, the filter is set up differently. 

That said, it should show lock, sats, dac voltage, and status correctly. 

Bob

On Jul 12, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Jim Sanford wb4...@wb4gcs.org wrote:

 All:
 My Nortel receiver has been running for 6 days now.  I am running the Lady 
 Heather software, but also have TBOLTMON.  It shows my position fairly well, 
 but I have seen a negative altitude, and am currently seeing 1565' altitude.  
 Based on local maps and the GPS in the car, I believe the antenna to be no 
 higher than 1280'.  I get lock with 4 to 6 satellites colored green.  I have 
 seen PHASE LOCKED, but am currently seeing recovery mode and the LOCKED LED 
 on the unit is flashing, which I think I remember means recovery.
 
 I have several questions:
 1.  Sometimes position is displayed in yellow, sometimes in white. What is 
 the significance of the color?
 2.  I see TC 100.0 sec, DAMP1.200, GAIN 1.2 Hz/v, INIT 3.00V. When I go to 
 KE5FX site, his values for TC, DAMP, Gain and INIT are very different.  In 
 particular, if DAMP is damping in a control loop, I am not surprised that my 
 very overdamped unit is not locking.   Question:  Are these parameters that 
 will converge, or are they parameters I should try to set?  The heather.cpp 
 files suggests that they may be settable, but does not say how.
 3.  On my plot, I see an RMS value in green, which suggests to me that 
 something is happy with the DAC voltage, even if very different from John's.  
 The scale is 10uV/div which suggests to me that it is NOT locked.
 4.  On my plot, I see an RMS value in yellow, which suggests to me that the 
 temp is OK, but the scale on temp is growing at the momoent, 10mC/div; 
 John's is 50 mC/div, but a much smoother plot than mine.  What is this 
 telling me?
 
 ROM,RAM, OSC, FPGA, POWER, EEPROM, ANTENNA, ALMANAC, DISCIPLINE, SAVED 
 POSITION status are all OK, even though altitude is bad.
 Can anyone help me understand what I am seeing, and in particular, why it 
 won't lock, or stay locked, when it is seeing good sat signals?
 
 Thanks!
 Jim
 wb4...@amsat.org
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPDSO is working

2013-07-13 Thread Chuck Harris

If a TTL signal does just work with your RS232 receiver, you have
a faulty receiver.  The receiver is supposed to have a dead zone from
+3V to -3V.  If you can get the receiver to function with 0V to +3V,
it has substandard noise immunity.  And then there is the little matter
of what will happen to the TTL input being connected to a real RS232
driver when It sees a potential +12V to -12V input.

I know that TTL level signals used to work with the original IBM-PC
comports, but they were using home made receivers and drivers that
did not meet the RS-232 spec.

The biggest problem with the MAX232 is its receiver was designed not
to the RS232 spec, but rather to work in the same way as the IBM-PC
comports.  It's RS side threshold is at 1.3V, and it has only 0.5V
of hysteresis.

It's not a bug, it's a feature?

-Chuck Harris

Chris Albertson wrote:


Whoever programmed the PIC in question inverted the signal for some
reason.  There should be no need for an inverter to use the MAX232
devices, they knew what they were doing when they designed them.



If you have an inverted TTL serial signal then you can connect it straight
to n RS-232 port and there is a very good change it will just work.  They
call it TTL level RS-232.   BUt if you want to reliable drive a long
cable it is best to level convert to true RS-232.   But today most re-232
is actually using zero and five volts.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPDSO is working

2013-07-13 Thread Brian Alsop

Guys,

The PIC in question was knowingly programmed upside down with the N 
option so it could talk directly to the computer without an RS232 
converter. (input side suitably protected from -voltage levels)


This works of most PC's which in actuality use 3.3 Volt logic in their 
RS232 port and input clamp highs/lows to be within the logic family 
limits.


There are two serial port choices for a PIC in the PICAXE/BS2 compilers 
N and T.


From the PICAXE manual.

N idles low and T idles high.  When using a simple resistor interface 
use N (inverted) When using a MAX232 type interface use T


The bottom line is depending upon what your device is putting out and 
what you are talking to you may or may not need an inverter for use with 
the MAX232.


Regards,
Brian

On 7/13/2013 03:10, Chris Albertson wrote:

You have it 100% correct.  The UT+ uses positive logic are the logic 1 is
5-volts but the RS-232 standard uses negative logic.   I think the MAX232
does the conversion correctly EXCEPT if you read the RS-232 standards they
use positive logic for the control signals.


On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Bob Stewart b...@evoria.net wrote:


Hi Brian,

That's just strange.  There are a whole lot of these MAX232 and MAX3232
devices being sold.  Hmm, I'm looking at the UT+ User's Guide, and it lists
the voltage levels as follows.  These would imply that an inverter is
necessary, right?  Could it be that someone programmed your PIC upside down
- i.e. using negative logic?

TTL
  0 V to 0.8 V = logic 0
  2.4 V to 5.0 V = logic 1
RS-232 (reordered from manual to put logic 0 on top)
5 V to 15 V = logic 0
   -5 V to -15 V = logic 1

Bob - AE6RV






From: Brian Alsop als...@nc.rr.com
To: Bob Stewart b...@evoria.net; Discussion of precise time and

frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com

Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPDSO is working


Hi Bob,

Here is my experience.  I had a PIC that output RS232 at 0-5 volt
levels.  It actually worked with my computer directly.  When I added a
MAX 232 to make the levels something like -10/+10 volts.  It didn't
work.  That's because the MAX232 inverts the polarity.  Look at the data
sheet, the level converters are clearly inverters.

The fix in my case was to invert the RS232 stream output by the PIC and
all was fine.

I'm not sure exactly what you have but a scope sorts it out quickly.

73 de Brian/K3KO



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.









-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2242 / Virus Database: 3204/5987 - Release Date: 07/12/13

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPDSO is working

2013-07-13 Thread EWKehren
Most MAX have two sets and one could use one as an inverter if one does not 
 want to add an extra IC. 
Bert Kehren
 
 
In a message dated 7/13/2013 10:09:12 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
als...@nc.rr.com writes:

Guys,

The PIC in question was knowingly programmed upside  down with the N 
option so it could talk directly to the computer without  an RS232 
converter. (input side suitably protected from -voltage  levels)

This works of most PC's which in actuality use 3.3 Volt logic  in their 
RS232 port and input clamp highs/lows to be within the logic  family 
limits.

There are two serial port choices for a PIC in the  PICAXE/BS2 compilers 
N and T.

From the PICAXE manual.

N  idles low and T idles high.  When using a simple resistor interface  
use N (inverted) When using a MAX232 type interface use T

The  bottom line is depending upon what your device is putting out and 
what you  are talking to you may or may not need an inverter for use with 
the  MAX232.

Regards,
Brian

On 7/13/2013 03:10, Chris Albertson  wrote:
 You have it 100% correct.  The UT+ uses positive logic  are the logic 1 
is
 5-volts but the RS-232 standard uses negative  logic.   I think the 
MAX232
 does the conversion correctly  EXCEPT if you read the RS-232 standards 
they
 use positive logic for  the control signals.


 On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:34 PM,  Bob Stewart b...@evoria.net wrote:

 Hi  Brian,

 That's just strange.  There are a whole  lot of these MAX232 and MAX3232
 devices being sold.  Hmm, I'm  looking at the UT+ User's Guide, and it 
lists
 the voltage levels  as follows.  These would imply that an inverter is
 necessary,  right?  Could it be that someone programmed your PIC upside  
down
 - i.e. using negative logic?

  TTL
   0 V to 0.8 V = logic  0
   2.4 V to 5.0 V = logic  1
 RS-232 (reordered from manual to put logic 0 on  top)
 5 V to 15 V = logic  0
-5 V to -15 V = logic  1

 Bob -  AE6RV




  
 From: Brian Alsop  als...@nc.rr.com
 To: Bob Stewart  b...@evoria.net; Discussion of precise time and
 frequency  measurement time-nuts@febo.com
 Sent: Friday, July 12,  2013 9:09 PM
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPDSO is  working


 Hi  Bob,

 Here is my experience.  I had a PIC  that output RS232 at 0-5 volt
 levels.  It actually worked  with my computer directly.  When I added a
 MAX 232 to  make the levels something like -10/+10 volts.  It didn't
  work.  That's because the MAX232 inverts the polarity.  Look at the  
data
 sheet, the level converters are clearly  inverters.

 The fix in my case was to invert  the RS232 stream output by the PIC and
 all was  fine.

 I'm not sure exactly what you have but a  scope sorts it out quickly.

 73 de  Brian/K3KO


  ___
 time-nuts mailing  list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow  the instructions  there.







-
No virus  found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2242  / Virus Database: 3204/5987 - Release Date:  07/12/13

___
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPDSO is working

2013-07-13 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

Hooking the ~ +/- 10V output of a MAX 232 to one of it's CMOS logic inputs 
probably isn't a real good idea. Two resistors and a cheap transistor make a 
fine inverter in this case. 

Bob

On Jul 13, 2013, at 11:29 AM, ewkeh...@aol.com wrote:

 Most MAX have two sets and one could use one as an inverter if one does not 
 want to add an extra IC. 
 Bert Kehren
 
 
 In a message dated 7/13/2013 10:09:12 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
 als...@nc.rr.com writes:
 
 Guys,
 
 The PIC in question was knowingly programmed upside  down with the N 
 option so it could talk directly to the computer without  an RS232 
 converter. (input side suitably protected from -voltage  levels)
 
 This works of most PC's which in actuality use 3.3 Volt logic  in their 
 RS232 port and input clamp highs/lows to be within the logic  family 
 limits.
 
 There are two serial port choices for a PIC in the  PICAXE/BS2 compilers 
 N and T.
 
 From the PICAXE manual.
 
 N  idles low and T idles high.  When using a simple resistor interface  
 use N (inverted) When using a MAX232 type interface use T
 
 The  bottom line is depending upon what your device is putting out and 
 what you  are talking to you may or may not need an inverter for use with 
 the  MAX232.
 
 Regards,
 Brian
 
 On 7/13/2013 03:10, Chris Albertson  wrote:
 You have it 100% correct.  The UT+ uses positive logic  are the logic 1 
 is
 5-volts but the RS-232 standard uses negative  logic.   I think the 
 MAX232
 does the conversion correctly  EXCEPT if you read the RS-232 standards 
 they
 use positive logic for  the control signals.
 
 
 On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:34 PM,  Bob Stewart b...@evoria.net wrote:
 
 Hi  Brian,
 
 That's just strange.  There are a whole  lot of these MAX232 and MAX3232
 devices being sold.  Hmm, I'm  looking at the UT+ User's Guide, and it 
 lists
 the voltage levels  as follows.  These would imply that an inverter is
 necessary,  right?  Could it be that someone programmed your PIC upside  
 down
 - i.e. using negative logic?
 
 TTL
  0 V to 0.8 V = logic  0
  2.4 V to 5.0 V = logic  1
 RS-232 (reordered from manual to put logic 0 on  top)
5 V to 15 V = logic  0
   -5 V to -15 V = logic  1
 
 Bob -  AE6RV
 
 
 
 
 
 From: Brian Alsop  als...@nc.rr.com
 To: Bob Stewart  b...@evoria.net; Discussion of precise time and
 frequency  measurement time-nuts@febo.com
 Sent: Friday, July 12,  2013 9:09 PM
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPDSO is  working
 
 
 Hi  Bob,
 
 Here is my experience.  I had a PIC  that output RS232 at 0-5 volt
 levels.  It actually worked  with my computer directly.  When I added a
 MAX 232 to  make the levels something like -10/+10 volts.  It didn't
 work.  That's because the MAX232 inverts the polarity.  Look at the  
 data
 sheet, the level converters are clearly  inverters.
 
 The fix in my case was to invert  the RS232 stream output by the PIC and
 all was  fine.
 
 I'm not sure exactly what you have but a  scope sorts it out quickly.
 
 73 de  Brian/K3KO
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing  list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow  the instructions  there.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 No virus  found in this message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 2012.0.2242  / Virus Database: 3204/5987 - Release Date:  07/12/13
 
 ___
 time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to  
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the  instructions there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPDSO is working

2013-07-13 Thread ewkehren

But a diode with two resistors is
Bert kehren



Sent from Samsung tabletBob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:Hi

Hooking the ~ +/- 10V output of a MAX 232 to one of it's CMOS logic inputs 
probably isn't a real good idea. Two resistors and a cheap transistor make a 
fine inverter in this case. 

Bob

On Jul 13, 2013, at 11:29 AM, ewkeh...@aol.com wrote:

 Most MAX have two sets and one could use one as an inverter if one does not 
 want to add an extra IC. 
 Bert Kehren
 
 
 In a message dated 7/13/2013 10:09:12 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
 als...@nc.rr.com writes:
 
 Guys,
 
 The PIC in question was knowingly programmed upside  down with the N 
 option so it could talk directly to the computer without  an RS232 
 converter. (input side suitably protected from -voltage  levels)
 
 This works of most PC's which in actuality use 3.3 Volt logic  in their 
 RS232 port and input clamp highs/lows to be within the logic  family 
 limits.
 
 There are two serial port choices for a PIC in the  PICAXE/BS2 compilers 
 N and T.
 
 From the PICAXE manual.
 
 N  idles low and T idles high.  When using a simple resistor interface  
 use N (inverted) When using a MAX232 type interface use T
 
 The  bottom line is depending upon what your device is putting out and 
 what you  are talking to you may or may not need an inverter for use with 
 the  MAX232.
 
 Regards,
 Brian
 
 On 7/13/2013 03:10, Chris Albertson  wrote:
 You have it 100% correct.  The UT+ uses positive logic  are the logic 1 
 is
 5-volts but the RS-232 standard uses negative  logic.   I think the 
 MAX232
 does the conversion correctly  EXCEPT if you read the RS-232 standards 
 they
 use positive logic for  the control signals.
 
 
 On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:34 PM,  Bob Stewart b...@evoria.net wrote:
 
 Hi  Brian,
 
 That's just strange.  There are a whole  lot of these MAX232 and MAX3232
 devices being sold.  Hmm, I'm  looking at the UT+ User's Guide, and it 
 lists
 the voltage levels  as follows.  These would imply that an inverter is
 necessary,  right?  Could it be that someone programmed your PIC upside  
 down
 - i.e. using negative logic?
 
 TTL
  0 V to 0.8 V = logic  0
  2.4 V to 5.0 V = logic  1
 RS-232 (reordered from manual to put logic 0 on  top)
    5 V to 15 V = logic  0
   -5 V to -15 V = logic  1
 
 Bob -  AE6RV
 
 
 
 
 
 From: Brian Alsop  als...@nc.rr.com
 To: Bob Stewart  b...@evoria.net; Discussion of precise time and
 frequency  measurement time-nuts@febo.com
 Sent: Friday, July 12,  2013 9:09 PM
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPDSO is  working
 
 
 Hi  Bob,
 
 Here is my experience.  I had a PIC  that output RS232 at 0-5 volt
 levels.  It actually worked  with my computer directly.  When I added a
 MAX 232 to  make the levels something like -10/+10 volts.  It didn't
 work.  That's because the MAX232 inverts the polarity.  Look at the  
 data
 sheet, the level converters are clearly  inverters.
 
 The fix in my case was to invert  the RS232 stream output by the PIC and
 all was  fine.
 
 I'm not sure exactly what you have but a  scope sorts it out quickly.
 
 73 de  Brian/K3KO
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing  list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow  the instructions  there.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 No virus  found in this message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 2012.0.2242  / Virus Database: 3204/5987 - Release Date:  07/12/13
 
 ___
 time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to  
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the  instructions there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] HPZ3816A config - can't enter correct co-ords

2013-07-13 Thread Randy D. Hunt

On 7/12/2013 10:51 AM, Mark C. Stephens wrote:

When I try to enter my antenna location as per surveyor:
-33.763698
151.092111

With this scpi command:
:GPS:POS S,+33,+79,3.69800E+001,E,+151,+9,+2.11100E+001,+9.45600E+001

For some reason, the Z3816A displays this:
LAT  S  33:59:36.980
LON  E 151:09:21.110

Which is correct except the south should say 33:79:36.980.

I can enter lower values that 59 for parameter 3 and it displays correct.
Can't seem to find a manual for these chaps either.

Shooting off the subject, Just had one arrive with a loose OCXO.
Yes loose, the solder joint on the OCXO had broken away from the PCB.
The intermittent contact was causing all sorts of chaos.
Most noticeably, the red ALARM LED came on, but none of the scpi commands could 
tell me why.
Health monitor reported [ OK ] shrug

Anyway, Any idea how I can enter the correct co-ordinates?


--marki

___
time-nuts mailing list --time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go tohttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


There is only 60 minutes in a degree. thus the 79 minutes in

33:79:36.980 in incorrect.

KI6WAS


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPDSO is working

2013-07-13 Thread Chris Albertson
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Chuck Harris cfhar...@erols.com wrote:

 If a TTL signal does just work with your RS232 receiver, you have
 a faulty receiver.  The receiver is supposed to have a dead zone from
 +3V to -3V.


You are 100% correct, almost all modern RS-232 receivers are faultily as
you describe and will work with TTL level signals

-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Nortel/Thunderbolt questions

2013-07-13 Thread Jim Sanford

Bob:
Correct, the Trimble Nortel box.  Replaced the old HP antenna with the 
26db amplified antenna which came with it, also mounted higher, and more 
clear of the roof.  It is seeing 5 satellites, 3 in yellow, and still 
says RECOVERY MODE.  It also (now) says, SAVED POSITION BAD, which I 
would expect, with a 300' error in elevation.


Jim

On 7/13/2013 9:04 AM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

I believe what you have here is a Trimble / Nortel box rather than a TBolt - is 
this correct?

If so there are a number of differences in what you can and can't do with LH. 
Also since it's a different design, the filter is set up differently.

That said, it should show lock, sats, dac voltage, and status correctly.

Bob

On Jul 12, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Jim Sanford wb4...@wb4gcs.org wrote:


All:
My Nortel receiver has been running for 6 days now.  I am running the Lady Heather 
software, but also have TBOLTMON.  It shows my position fairly well, but I have seen a 
negative altitude, and am currently seeing 1565' altitude.  Based on local maps and the 
GPS in the car, I believe the antenna to be no higher than 1280'.  I get lock with 4 to 6 
satellites colored green.  I have seen PHASE LOCKED, but am currently seeing 
recovery mode and the LOCKED LED on the unit is flashing, which I think I 
remember means recovery.

I have several questions:
1.  Sometimes position is displayed in yellow, sometimes in white. What is the 
significance of the color?
2.  I see TC 100.0 sec, DAMP1.200, GAIN 1.2 Hz/v, INIT 3.00V. When I go to 
KE5FX site, his values for TC, DAMP, Gain and INIT are very different.  In 
particular, if DAMP is damping in a control loop, I am not surprised that my 
very overdamped unit is not locking.   Question:  Are these parameters that 
will converge, or are they parameters I should try to set?  The heather.cpp 
files suggests that they may be settable, but does not say how.
3.  On my plot, I see an RMS value in green, which suggests to me that 
something is happy with the DAC voltage, even if very different from John's.  
The scale is 10uV/div which suggests to me that it is NOT locked.
4.  On my plot, I see an RMS value in yellow, which suggests to me that the 
temp is OK, but the scale on temp is growing at the momoent, 10mC/div; 
John's is 50 mC/div, but a much smoother plot than mine.  What is this telling 
me?

ROM,RAM, OSC, FPGA, POWER, EEPROM, ANTENNA, ALMANAC, DISCIPLINE, SAVED POSITION 
status are all OK, even though altitude is bad.
Can anyone help me understand what I am seeing, and in particular, why it won't 
lock, or stay locked, when it is seeing good sat signals?

Thanks!
Jim
wb4...@amsat.org


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] UT+ Software for Linux?

2013-07-13 Thread Bob Stewart
OK, this isn't as easy as I thought it would be.  Is there any Linux software 
to interface with the UT+, or will I have to swap out a disk and boot Windows 
to get the eval software from Synergy-GPS to work?  I see some primitive source 
code on the net but getting anything useful out of that would be a project I 
just don't want to divert to at the moment.

Bob - AE6RV
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Nortel/Thunderbolt questions

2013-07-13 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

On mine, I did a full reset and let them start from a survey. After they 
figured out where they were, I did the normal stuff to save the position. 

Bob

On Jul 13, 2013, at 5:58 PM, Jim Sanford wb4...@wb4gcs.org wrote:

 Bob:
 Correct, the Trimble Nortel box.  Replaced the old HP antenna with the 26db 
 amplified antenna which came with it, also mounted higher, and more clear of 
 the roof.  It is seeing 5 satellites, 3 in yellow, and still says RECOVERY 
 MODE.  It also (now) says, SAVED POSITION BAD, which I would expect, with a 
 300' error in elevation.
 
 Jim
 
 On 7/13/2013 9:04 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
 Hi
 
 I believe what you have here is a Trimble / Nortel box rather than a TBolt - 
 is this correct?
 
 If so there are a number of differences in what you can and can't do with 
 LH. Also since it's a different design, the filter is set up differently.
 
 That said, it should show lock, sats, dac voltage, and status correctly.
 
 Bob
 
 On Jul 12, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Jim Sanford wb4...@wb4gcs.org wrote:
 
 All:
 My Nortel receiver has been running for 6 days now.  I am running the Lady 
 Heather software, but also have TBOLTMON.  It shows my position fairly 
 well, but I have seen a negative altitude, and am currently seeing 1565' 
 altitude.  Based on local maps and the GPS in the car, I believe the 
 antenna to be no higher than 1280'.  I get lock with 4 to 6 satellites 
 colored green.  I have seen PHASE LOCKED, but am currently seeing recovery 
 mode and the LOCKED LED on the unit is flashing, which I think I remember 
 means recovery.
 
 I have several questions:
 1.  Sometimes position is displayed in yellow, sometimes in white. What is 
 the significance of the color?
 2.  I see TC 100.0 sec, DAMP1.200, GAIN 1.2 Hz/v, INIT 3.00V. When I go to 
 KE5FX site, his values for TC, DAMP, Gain and INIT are very different.  In 
 particular, if DAMP is damping in a control loop, I am not surprised that 
 my very overdamped unit is not locking.   Question:  Are these parameters 
 that will converge, or are they parameters I should try to set?  The 
 heather.cpp files suggests that they may be settable, but does not say how.
 3.  On my plot, I see an RMS value in green, which suggests to me that 
 something is happy with the DAC voltage, even if very different from 
 John's.  The scale is 10uV/div which suggests to me that it is NOT 
 locked.
 4.  On my plot, I see an RMS value in yellow, which suggests to me that the 
 temp is OK, but the scale on temp is growing at the momoent, 10mC/div; 
 John's is 50 mC/div, but a much smoother plot than mine.  What is this 
 telling me?
 
 ROM,RAM, OSC, FPGA, POWER, EEPROM, ANTENNA, ALMANAC, DISCIPLINE, SAVED 
 POSITION status are all OK, even though altitude is bad.
 Can anyone help me understand what I am seeing, and in particular, why it 
 won't lock, or stay locked, when it is seeing good sat signals?
 
 Thanks!
 Jim
 wb4...@amsat.org
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Nortel/Thunderbolt questions

2013-07-13 Thread Jim Sanford

I initiated a survey a few hours ago.

Now it thinks I'm at 175' altitude (more like 1280') and calls the saved 
position good.


What is the normal stuff to save the position??

Finally, every time that the satellite count changes, there's a huge 
(150,000 uV or so) excursion in the DAC voltage, so it never converges 
to small variation like I see when I look at the KE5FX site -- what is 
this telling me?


Thanks,
Jim

On 7/13/2013 8:44 PM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

On mine, I did a full reset and let them start from a survey. After they 
figured out where they were, I did the normal stuff to save the position.

Bob

On Jul 13, 2013, at 5:58 PM, Jim Sanford wb4...@wb4gcs.org wrote:


Bob:
Correct, the Trimble Nortel box.  Replaced the old HP antenna with the 26db 
amplified antenna which came with it, also mounted higher, and more clear of 
the roof.  It is seeing 5 satellites, 3 in yellow, and still says RECOVERY 
MODE.  It also (now) says, SAVED POSITION BAD, which I would expect, with a 
300' error in elevation.

Jim

On 7/13/2013 9:04 AM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

I believe what you have here is a Trimble / Nortel box rather than a TBolt - is 
this correct?

If so there are a number of differences in what you can and can't do with LH. 
Also since it's a different design, the filter is set up differently.

That said, it should show lock, sats, dac voltage, and status correctly.

Bob

On Jul 12, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Jim Sanford wb4...@wb4gcs.org wrote:


All:
My Nortel receiver has been running for 6 days now.  I am running the Lady Heather 
software, but also have TBOLTMON.  It shows my position fairly well, but I have seen a 
negative altitude, and am currently seeing 1565' altitude.  Based on local maps and the 
GPS in the car, I believe the antenna to be no higher than 1280'.  I get lock with 4 to 6 
satellites colored green.  I have seen PHASE LOCKED, but am currently seeing 
recovery mode and the LOCKED LED on the unit is flashing, which I think I 
remember means recovery.

I have several questions:
1.  Sometimes position is displayed in yellow, sometimes in white. What is the 
significance of the color?
2.  I see TC 100.0 sec, DAMP1.200, GAIN 1.2 Hz/v, INIT 3.00V. When I go to 
KE5FX site, his values for TC, DAMP, Gain and INIT are very different.  In 
particular, if DAMP is damping in a control loop, I am not surprised that my 
very overdamped unit is not locking.   Question:  Are these parameters that 
will converge, or are they parameters I should try to set?  The heather.cpp 
files suggests that they may be settable, but does not say how.
3.  On my plot, I see an RMS value in green, which suggests to me that 
something is happy with the DAC voltage, even if very different from John's.  
The scale is 10uV/div which suggests to me that it is NOT locked.
4.  On my plot, I see an RMS value in yellow, which suggests to me that the 
temp is OK, but the scale on temp is growing at the momoent, 10mC/div; 
John's is 50 mC/div, but a much smoother plot than mine.  What is this telling 
me?

ROM,RAM, OSC, FPGA, POWER, EEPROM, ANTENNA, ALMANAC, DISCIPLINE, SAVED POSITION 
status are all OK, even though altitude is bad.
Can anyone help me understand what I am seeing, and in particular, why it won't 
lock, or stay locked, when it is seeing good sat signals?

Thanks!
Jim
wb4...@amsat.org


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Spectrum Analyzer Suggestions

2013-07-13 Thread Perry Sandeen


List,
 
I just purchased a HP 3585 spec analyzer on E bay
for a reasonable price.  I wanted this
instead of the 181 series as the range was more to what I’d be using and it was
of a newer vintage.  The 3585a goes from
10 Hz to 40 MHz which is a most useful range for my purposes. so far, so good.
 
The problem is I didn’t know the beast weighed a svelte
88 pounds! Double Hernia time!
 
What I’d appreciate advice for a used spec
analyzer in the $1,000 range that is at least much lighter.  A smaller size 
would also be a benefit.  I probably would never use it above 100 MHz. A
slightly smaller screen would be OK.
 
Suggestions appreciated.
 
Regards,
 
Perrier
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Spectrum Analyzer Suggestions

2013-07-13 Thread wb6bnq

Well Perry,

You could consider an IFR A-7550 SpecAn. They are not HP but still a 
decent little SpecAn that is just a bit bigger then a TEK-453 scope. It 
covers from 100KHz to 1GHz.


Shop carefully to make sure you get one with atleast the internal 
tracking generator option. DO NOT rely on pictures because the tracking 
generator connector is there even if no option. There is also an 
internal receiver option, but that only works when you are at zero span 
and truthfully, not all that useful, but nice to have. It also has an 
internal battery option, however, the battery pack is quite expensive 
and unless you actually need it, it is a complete waste of money. If it 
comes with a battery, expect it to not be in very good shape. The 
battery pack is made up of large round 2 volt lead acid cells and when 
left discharged will leak acid.


BillWB6BNQ


Perry Sandeen wrote:


List,
 
I just purchased a HP 3585 spec analyzer on E bay

for a reasonable price.  I wanted this
instead of the 181 series as the range was more to what I’d be using and it 
was
of a newer vintage.  The 3585a goes from
10 Hz to 40 MHz which is a most useful range for my purposes. so far, so good.
 
The problem is I didn’t know the beast weighed a svelte

88 pounds! Double Hernia time!
 
What I’d appreciate advice for a used spec

analyzer in the $1,000 range that is at least much lighter.  A smaller size 
would also be a benefit. Â I probably would never use it above 100 MHz. A
slightly smaller screen would be OK.
 
Suggestions appreciated.
 
Regards,
 
Perrier

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Spectrum Analyzer Suggestions

2013-07-13 Thread wb6bnq

Perry,

I did not pay attention to bottom frequency of the hp SpecAn in my last 
post. Do you actually do something below 100KHz ?


BillWB6BNQ

Perry Sandeen wrote:


List,
 
I just purchased a HP 3585 spec analyzer on E bay

for a reasonable price.  I wanted this
instead of the 181 series as the range was more to what I’d be using and it 
was
of a newer vintage.  The 3585a goes from
10 Hz to 40 MHz which is a most useful range for my purposes. so far, so good.
 
The problem is I didn’t know the beast weighed a svelte

88 pounds! Double Hernia time!
 
What I’d appreciate advice for a used spec

analyzer in the $1,000 range that is at least much lighter.  A smaller size 
would also be a benefit. Â I probably would never use it above 100 MHz. A
slightly smaller screen would be OK.
 
Suggestions appreciated.
 
Regards,
 
Perrier

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Spectrum Analyzer Suggestions

2013-07-13 Thread Peter Gottlieb

It may be heavy but is a VERY nice analyzer.

I have a Tek 495P which is also a very nice analyzer, goes to 1.8 GHz, is 
smaller and somewhat lighter (portable), and should be findable in nice 
condition for under $1k.



On 7/13/2013 11:09 PM, Perry Sandeen wrote:


List,
  
I just purchased a HP 3585 spec analyzer on E bay

for a reasonable price.  I wanted this
instead of the 181 series as the range was more to what I’d be using and it was
of a newer vintage.  The 3585a goes from
10 Hz to 40 MHz which is a most useful range for my purposes. so far, so good.
  
The problem is I didn’t know the beast weighed a svelte

88 pounds! Double Hernia time!
  
What I’d appreciate advice for a used spec

analyzer in the $1,000 range that is at least much lighter.  A smaller size 
would also be a benefit.  I probably would never use it above 100 MHz. A
slightly smaller screen would be OK.
  
Suggestions appreciated.
  
Regards,
  
Perrier

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1432 / Virus Database: 3204/5989 - Release Date: 07/13/13


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Spectrum Analyzer Suggestions

2013-07-13 Thread Mark C. Stephens
Perry I have a 3585A too, The weight isn't so bad once you get used to it. :)
Mines on a rack shelf that I can slide it out onto the workbench for 
maintenance.

Performance wise, they are fantastic for phase noise measurement using John 
Miles's Phase noise software.
Although a little slow, It is pretty nice to see what's going on down at 10 Hz.

I really can't find a replacement for my 3585A, other than the B model.

Also the boards come up cheap on eBay if you need parts.
I have almost a complete set of spare boards I bought for 10 bucks each.

So all in all, you got yourself a good Analyser, cheap to maintain and good 
specs.

Run it through the performance tests as per the manual, this SA will be a 
pleasant surprise for you :)


-marki


-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf 
Of Perry Sandeen
Sent: Sunday, 14 July 2013 1:10 PM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Spectrum Analyzer Suggestions



List,
 
I just purchased a HP 3585 spec analyzer on E bay for a reasonable price.  I 
wanted this instead of the 181 series as the range was more to what I’d be 
using and it was of a newer vintage.  The 3585a goes from
10 Hz to 40 MHz which is a most useful range for my purposes. so far, so good.
 
The problem is I didn’t know the beast weighed a svelte
88 pounds! Double Hernia time!
 
What I’d appreciate advice for a used spec analyzer in the $1,000 range that is 
at least much lighter.  A smaller size would also be a benefit.  I probably 
would never use it above 100 MHz. A slightly smaller screen would be OK.
 
Suggestions appreciated.
 
Regards,
 
Perrier
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.