Re: [time-nuts] 100 MHz Source

2008-04-29 Thread Jeff Mock
I have a HP70310A.  It's the time reference for the HP/Agilent modular 
MMS system.  It seems that the ebay prices for this stuff varies quite a 
lot depending on random factors.  I think I got mine for a couple of 
hundred dollars.

It has a McCoy OCXO and provides 10MHz and 100MHz outputs.  You can 
externally reference to a 10MHz GPSDO if you like (that's what I do).

jeff

Richard W. Solomon wrote:
 I need a 100 MHz source to lock up a F/W brick. I have 10 MHz available
 
 from my GPSDO. Anyone know an easy way to get 100 MHz using the 10 MHz
 
 source ? Maybe another PLO ?
 
 If I multiply then I need some pretty decent filtering which might be 
 difficult.
 
  
 
 Thanks, Dick, W1KSZ
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Power monitoring

2008-04-17 Thread Jeff Mock


Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jim Lux writ
 es:
 
 As long as I'm dreaming...  Suppose I wanted to measure the power my whole
 house is drawing.  What's available along the lines of a current transformer
 on the main lines?  My first thought is that nobody does that (for homes) so
 it's probably horribly expensive.  On the other hand there is a lot of
 interest in energy conservation these days so it might only be somewhat
 expensive.
 Lots of these available, in the few hundred dollar range..
 
 The best and likely cheapest solution is to get the data from your
 utility meter.  Most meters have a S0 output which sends a pulse
 evern X Wh.
 
 If you can't find it, ask your power-company for access.  Tell them
 you want to monitor your energy conservation effort and they'll likely
 not charge you for it.
 
 If that fails, search google for gasdims :-)
 

I like this thing
   http://www.digital-loggers.com/epcr2.html

It has two busses, one can be powered by a UPS and the other directly 
off the mains.  You can measure power and voltage on both busses, it has 
a reasonable web interface, you can turn the outlets on/off from the 
network.

I think it's a deal for $295, but they also have a cheaper model.

jeff


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Racal-Dana 1992 switches

2008-03-29 Thread Jeff Mock
How do you pick the optimal difference frequency?  I see that 1kHz has a 
nice numerical property where you can read the frequency directly off 
the counter, you just need to mentally prepend the first 4 digits. With 
computers it's not that important, the difference can easily be a 
strange number if it optimizes performance. I'm wondering what 
difference frequency optimizes the performance of the mixer thing or if 
it really matters?

Do you worry about the phase-noise contribution of the 10.001MHz source? 
As I do the math, it seems that the phase noise of the mixing signal is 
subtracted out after the mixing, so it shouldn't mater that the 
10.001Mhz source comes from a frac-N synthesizer and has a few random spurs.

You say this isn't state of the art.  Why not?  Can't you run the timing 
collection for longer runs and get higher resolution results?

jeff


Pete wrote:
 This topic has been addressed earlier; though with some
 debate. I have proposed a simple heterodyne scheme for
 beating 2 stable sources against each other  observing
 a 1KHz difference frequency to resolve 1uHz deltas.
 This is NOT a state-of-the-art scheme, but it will
 provide better than 1E-12 resolution in less than 10s.
 
 This scheme does require some non-standard items.
 
 1. You need a stable synthesizer with external clock
 capability to yield 10.001 Mhz, phase locked to 
 one of your sources. The HP3336C or a PTS040
 work fine.
 
 2. You need a 1KHz zero crossing detector to drive
 your counter input with low jitter. The ZCD requires
 2 opamps  a few passive parts, including 2
 inductors you'll need to wind by hand.
 
 3. You need a level 7 double balanced mixer to
 heterodyne the second source  the 10.001Mhz
 signal. Mixers optimized as phase detectors, like
 the  mini-circuits SYPD-1 work well for this.
 You also need a diplexer on the mixer output
 to separate the 1KHz beat signal from the other
 mixer products. The diplexer is 6 passive parts.
 
 The results are stable  provide counter readings of
 9 significant digits down to 1uHz with the leading 4
 digits of frequency assumed from the mixing process.
 The counter gate time setting provides useful  often
 necessary averaging of the readings; so a variable
 gate time counter is handy. I've used a H-P 5335A,
  don't know much about the Racal 199x series,
 but I suspect they would do just fine.
 
 Pete Rawson
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS PRN07 tracking

2008-03-27 Thread Jeff Mock
And they turned off PRN 10 the next day after making PRN 07 valid.  It's 
like they're playing GPS wack-a-mole.

jeff

Magnus Danielson wrote:
 Hi!
 
 Earlier this month the launched the latest of the GPS IIR-M sats, and today I
 had the oppertunity to observe it. It seems it was brought quickly on air as
 operational. It runs at PRN 07.
 
 Cheers,
 Magnus
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] TADD-1 six channel RF distribution amplifier

2008-03-27 Thread Jeff Mock

Bruce Griffiths wrote:
 Steve wrote:
 I'm thinking about using the TAPR TADD-1 six channel RF distribution 
 amplifier to distribute the 10MHz output of my Trimble Thunderbolt to a 
 few pieces of test equipment.

 What does the TADD-1 do to the phase noise characteristics of its 
 outputs as compared to the phase noise characteristics of  its input? 
 Improve? Degrade? Little or no change?

 Thanks.

 Steve K8JQ


I've been using a TADD-1 for about 6-months now and I'm quite happy with 
it.  You certainly can't beat the price.  I added the optional 10MHz BPF 
and tuned it with a tracking generator and spectrum analyzer.  The 
outputs are very clean.

I've never tried to measure phase noise, but the op amps and the rest of 
the circuit seem to be good choices to me.  tvb did some analysis of the 
box you might find interesting:
http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/tadd-1/

jeff


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Buffering the 1pps output from a Z3801A

2008-03-26 Thread Jeff Mock
That's a cool box, but I took a more quick and dirty approach that has 
served me well.  There's a TTL level PPS inside the box, if I remember 
correctly the part has quite a lot of drive and is fine for driving a 
50-ohm cable.  I needed a proper UTC PPS signal for a radio astronomy 
project and I made the following mod to my z3801a:

solder a 50-ohm resistor to the TTL PPS signal inside the Z3801A.

Use a nibbler tool to widen a cooling hole enough for a piece of
rg-58.

Zip tie a short piece of rg-58 coax into the hole in the side
of the box.  I have a female connector dangling outside the box.

Wire the coax to ground and the 50-ohm resistor of the TTL drive.

This has served me well for many years and driven a variety
of spectrometers.  The signal looks great on a scope when terminated
to 50-ohms, but it is a bit of a quick and dirty solution that might
not be appealing to some.

I can't tell you which chip/pin is the PPS signal, it was several years
ago. I'll remove the lid and tell you the proper pin if you take this
approach.

jeff


John Franke wrote:
 See;  http://www.realhamradio.com/sidecar.htm
 
 John WA4WDL
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Peter Vince [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 9:29 AM
 Subject: [time-nuts] Buffering the 1pps output from a Z3801A
 
 
 Bruce, et al,

 The 1pps output of an HP Z3801A and Trimble Thunderbolt is
 only available (as far as I know) as a balanced ECL signal on the
 25-pin connector, with dire warnings in the manuals about not
 earthing either side of the ECL signals.  Would you be able to advise
 on a simple buffer circuit that would allow me to drive the usual
 unbalanced 50-ohm coax please?

 Thanks,

 Peter Vince  (London, England)



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Close-in phase noise measurements

2008-03-26 Thread Jeff Mock
This is a half-baked idea I've thinking about for awhile.  I wonder if 
it might be possible to create a single measurement to combine allan 
variance and phase noise in the same plot.  Allan variance usually plots 
tau in seconds on the x-axis.  Instead, you might plot 1/s or frequency 
on the x-axis.  This way, allan variance looks more like very close-in 
phase noise.

For example, a point where tau=1000s becomes the phase noise at 1mHz 
(milli-hertz) from the carrier.  Combining this with more typical phase 
noise measurements, you can create a single log-log graph covering 
micro-hertz to hundreds of kilo-hertz.  The advantage of combining the 
measurements into a single entity is that you get most of the 
characterization parameters for a timebase in a single graph.

Would this work?  Half-baked, I know...
jeff


Shane wrote:
 Do you know much about the RS FSUP50?
 
 http://www2.rohde-schwarz.com/en/products/test_and_measurement/product_categ
 ories/spectrum_analysis/FSUP-%7C-Key_Facts-%7C-4-%7C-966.html
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Bruce Griffiths
 Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 8:22 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Close-in phase noise measurements
 
 Shane wrote:
 Wenzel has a setup you can purchase at low cost.  

 http://www.wenzel.com/pdffiles1/PNTS%201000/BP-1000-SC.pdf

 Phase noise test sets can be pricey... $200K
   
 Shane
 
 Their calibration method is somewhat problematic at the low frequency 
 end where the effect of the PLL and the audio amplifier low frequency 
 cutoff may be significant.
 The NIST calibration technique: 
 http://tf.nist.gov/timefreq/general/pdf/1000.pdf is far superior.
 
 Bruce
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 58532a ANTENNA CABLE?

2008-03-26 Thread Jeff Mock
I use 100 feet of LMR-400, which is fantastic, but overkill.  It 
probably loses about 6db for 100-feet at 1.5GHz.  There are a lot of 
online vendors that will sell you any length you want with N-type 
connectors on both ends.

jeff


jshank wrote:
 Hi,
 I am in the process of setting up a Z3801A and would like to know what type 
 of cable I should use for a 50' run to an 58532A antenna.
 
 Also I need to purchase one of the monitoring software programs for this 
 Z3801A,  any suggestions.
 
 jshank
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] hp 5065A Rb AC power connector ?

2008-03-24 Thread Jeff Mock

Tom Van Baak wrote:
 Does anyone know the Amphenol part number for this one?  The manual 
 gives only an HP part number...

 Thanks,
 Dan
 
 MS-3106A-18-22S; see also:
 
 http://www.leapsecond.com/museum/hp5065a/conn.htm
 
 /tvb
 

You are getting way too organized...
jeff


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] FEI 5680A

2008-03-05 Thread Jeff Mock
I think that I might purchase a GPS disciplined oscillator instead of 
rubidium standard for a cal lab.  There's no physics package in danger 
of wearing out and no worries about local settings changing accuracy. 
They are also low power and something like the Trimble unit is very compact.

jeff


Rex wrote:
 Jean-Christophe Deschamps wrote:
 Dear group,

 I'm a newbie here, so please bear with me.

 I'm about to buy a FEI 5680A Rubidium frequency standard off 
 ebay.  From what I've gathered, these units were used in the telco 
 industry for about 10 years, but are still useable for my needs.  I 
 wish to have a reasonably good frequency standard for calibrating test 
 equipment (scope calibrators, function generators, etc), say every 6 
 months or once a year.  For such use I really don't need extreme 
 stability/accuracy.  Only hope is that the physics part isn't 
 completely dead.

 These units typically only produce a 1pps signal, but have the capacity 
 to produce the classical 10 MHz sine wave.

 I've found a number of documents explaining how to have the 10 MHz 
 produced by these versions.  Two of them give consistent informations 
 and seem to be sufficiently documented to be of real value.

 Drop me a mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you feel posting the files could 
 help someone.  I don't know how to post files so that readers of this 
 list can access them. Anyway, I'll postpone distributing the files at 
 large until I check by myself their contents is useful.

 Feedback welcome!

   
 It seems there were many versions of the 5680A that look about the same 
 but are very different. Some run on just +15 V and some need that and 
 +5V. I suspect there are other voltage options too. Some are adjustable 
 in frequency with software commands or a C-field screw.
 
 I bought one in early 2005. I figured out by reverse engineering that it 
 needed both +15 and +5 V. It provides both 10 MHz and 1pps outputs on 
 the D-connector. I never found a way to get it to respond to any serial 
 commands, although it has rs-232 interface chips and the signals were 
 propagating inside. I never found any way to adjust the frequency on 
 this one.
 
 Other people clearly have units that run on just +15V and do respond to 
 serial commands to set the frequency. One person reported they were able 
 to adjust the frequency on theirs with a screw setting.
 
 So it is hard to say what you may get. You may want to search the 
 time-nuts archives, particularly in 2005.
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Atomic clock on ISS

2008-02-18 Thread Jeff Mock
Today's astronomy picture of the day says that future experiments in the 
new ISS Columbus laboratory include an atomic clock to measure miniscule 
  timing effects:

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap080219.html

Does anyone know somthing about the sort of clock they're going to put 
in the new lab?  Presumably they'll also need a way to do time transfer 
and make precise timing measurements.  If I lived on a space station I 
would demand an atomic clock.

jeff


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Fake leap second ntp servers

2008-01-31 Thread Jeff Mock
There's probably a good NTP hacker hanging around on this list, but the 
best place to answer your question is probably the NTP hackers mailing list:

https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo

jeff

Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
 Hey folks,
 
 I just joined your email list to inquire about something which some of you
 may have some knowledge of...
 
 I'm developing some code (for linux with an ntp server/client running), for
 which I would like to verify that it handles positive (and negative)
 leap seconds correctly (I need good time stamps for cross-machine
 synchronization).
 Obviously this is hard to do in practice due to the extreme rarity of these
 events.
 (even more so, considering my home servers running ntp apparently for some
 reason saw leap seconds at the end of 2007...)
 I've thought about switching to djb's suggestion of keeping a non-posix time
 zone on the machines in question, but this
 is not feasible because of existing legacy code...
 
 Thus I am curious to know if someone somewhere has perhaps set up fake ntp
 servers which regularly insert and delete
 leap seconds (ie. reset their time every couple days and randomly simulate a
 positive or negative leap second 2-3 days
 down the line).
 
 If not, does anyone know how to go about setting up such a fake ntp server
 for testing purposes?
 
 Also, is there a known good list of ntp servers which are known to provide
 correct leap second announcements (as mentioned above,
 the stratum 1s at least 2 of my machines were synched to apparently
 broadcast a leap second at the end of 2008).
 I've heard horror stories about time synchronization going haywire the last
 time there was a leap second and some upstream
 ntp servers announced leap-seconds and others didn't (the time
 mis-synchronization brought down the application)...
 
 Cheers,
 Maciej.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Clock Powers of Ten

2008-01-31 Thread Jeff Mock
Very nice, it reminded me of a NYT article about a year ago that 
describes the long zoom as one of the defining aspects of this generation:

 
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/08/magazine/08games.html?ei=5090en=d551133c9414ebbdex=131796partner=rssuserlandemc=rsspagewanted=all


jeff

John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
 Very cool, Tom!
 
 John
 
 
 Tom Van Baak said the following on 01/31/2008 04:55 PM:
 There are good clocks and bad clocks. Most need power, one
 needs food, another runs all by itself.

 Take a trip across 15 orders of magnitude of clock performance:

 http://www.leapsecond.com/ten/

 /tvb


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Prologix, Linux and bash

2008-01-16 Thread Jeff Mock
I have excellent luck using a Prologix device on a couple of different 
machines running ubuntu linux (7.04 and 7.10).   I find it totally painless.

You might run usbview and see if the device is being recognized or look 
at /var/log/messages while plugging in the device.  Something like:

% sudo tail -f /var/log/messages

You should see the device get recognized and a message telling you what 
device it is assigned to.

I use the ser2net daemon with the prologix device.  This acts as a proxy 
  for accessing serial devices over the network.  This way you can 
telnet to the GPIB device from the local machine or over the network. 
This makes it really convenient to access GPIB devices over the local 
network.

As far as programming the GPIB devices, I use perl, it's a lot cleaner 
than a bunch of crazy echo commands in a bash script.  The Telnet module 
in perl makes it easy to access the ser2net proxy to the GPIB device.

There are a lot of different ways to do it, but that's what works best 
for me.

jeff


Patrick wrote:
 Hi Everyone
 
 I know that my Prologix device is functioning thanks to Ulrich's EZGPIB.
 
 I however want to use this device under Linux. My Ubuntu box cannot find 
 /dev/ttyUSB0 but a Mepis Linux live CD can.
 
 I have tried the following commands:
 echo ++auto 0 CR  /dev/ttyUSB0
 echo ++auto 1 CR  /dev/ttyUSB0
 echo ++auto 0 \r  /dev/ttyUSB0
 echo ++auto 1 \r  /dev/ttyUSB0
 echo ++auto 0 \n  /dev/ttyUSB0
 echo ++auto 1 \n  /dev/ttyUSB0
 echo ++auto 0 \r\n  /dev/ttyUSB0
 echo ++auto 1 \r\n  /dev/ttyUSB0
 
 I have not been able to switch the led on from talk to listen.
 
 Could someone give me a bash sample of the correct syntax to use?
 
 Thanks in advance-Patrick
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] accurate portable time source

2007-12-28 Thread Jeff Mock

Ronald Held wrote:
 This request is different than the last one.
 The most accurate TCXO watch is about 1 seconds/year, with regular
 wear and lots of adjustment. [...]

Really?  What watch is good to 1s per year?  Can you point me at one? 
That's amazing for a watch.

jeff


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Stuff I bought

2007-12-27 Thread Jeff Mock


Neon John wrote:
 On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 11:30:05 -0800, Jeff Mock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 Smart Tweezers
 http://www.advancedevices.com/

 It's an RLC meter packaged in a pair of tweezers.  It's accurate and 
 fast, feels good to use on the bench.  When working with SMT parts, 
 particularly capacitors that typically aren't marked with values, this 
 tool makes it easy to deal with tiny parts on the bench.

 Truth be told, this product is probably the version before the one you 
 really want to own.  I've found a couple of bugs in the software and the 
 industrial design should be nicer, but it's still a good product.
 
 Oh crap!  There goes the food budget for next month. :-)
 
 Jeff, did you buy yours directly from them or did you locate a dealer with a 
 better
 price?
 

I got mine off ebay.  The manufacturer sells directly on ebay for a 
discount.  That was the cheapest I found...

jeff


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Stuff I bought

2007-12-26 Thread Jeff Mock
I hope this might start a holiday thread of cool stuff other people have 
purchased recently.

Here are a few things that I've bought this year that I really like.
jeff

--


Smart Tweezers
http://www.advancedevices.com/

It's an RLC meter packaged in a pair of tweezers.  It's accurate and 
fast, feels good to use on the bench.  When working with SMT parts, 
particularly capacitors that typically aren't marked with values, this 
tool makes it easy to deal with tiny parts on the bench.

Truth be told, this product is probably the version before the one you 
really want to own.  I've found a couple of bugs in the software and the 
industrial design should be nicer, but it's still a good product.


SMA wrench
http://www.smelectronics.us/coaxialtorquewrenchessmatypendin.htm

I've never known how much to tighten an SMA connector.  As time goes by 
I have more and more SMA connectors.  I've seen real RF guys with SMA 
torque wrenches, but never broken down and bought one until this year. 
The 5/16 ST-SMA3 is very satisfying and I never worry about SMA 
connections (but it's a little too expensive). I think 8 in.lbs is the 
right number.


Suunto Tandem compass and clinometer
http://www.suunto.com (click on precision instruments)

This is a really fantastic machined aluminum compass and clinometer. 
It's super precise and has optical sites on both instruments.  I find it 
amazingly accurate with a little practice.  I can look up an Iridium 
flare on heavens-above.com, point the device at the sky and find the 
precise az/el location just before the flare.  It's made in Finland, 
that seems good for some unknown reason.


Sure Electronics
http://stores.ebay.com/Sure-Electronics

They are an ebay seller in mainland China that ships directly to buyers 
worldwide. They sell a bunch of junk, but the nice things they sell are 
designer kits of passive components.  They are a little slow, it seems 
to take a couple of weeks to get an item, but they have some really nice 
design kits.  You can get a 2000 piece kit of 0805 capacitors, each 
value in neatly labeled boxes for less than $20 including shipping. 
This is about $100 from Digikey and not nearly as nice.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Stuff I bought

2007-12-26 Thread Jeff Mock

Brooke Clarke wrote:
 
 I have a Suunto wrist computer and like it very much. The normal time, date, 
 alarm, stop watch functions plus compass, altimeter/barometer and thermometer.
 Which compass did you get?
 

I didn't get the wristwatch, The Suunto tandem is a hunk of aluminum 
with a liquid filled compass and a liquid filled clinometer machined 
into the case and optical sites for both.  It has a long red strap you 
can hang around your neck, no electronics, no batteries...

The website is difficult to link to, click on the precision instrument 
section.  I learned about it from a cinematographer friend.  Evidently 
it's popular with film types for planning shots with the sun or moon. 
You see the instrument on the Discovery Channel show Sunrise Earth, the 
main photographer guy always has it hanging around his neck during 
interviews.  In addition to being pretty accurate, it's the sort of 
product that feels really nice in your hand, it makes you look for 
excuses to use it.

jeff


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] WIRED Time Nuts, NPR

2007-12-18 Thread Jeff Mock
I think you were just great.

The Bryant Park personalities seem to adopt this position that they use 
a lot of technology, but they'll act like a dufus if they actually 
discuss some technology.  They like to say blog a lot, but never with 
understanding about how internet tech works.  I think it makes it really 
difficult for BPP to talk to people that want to talk about how things 
work, they would rather be amazed by something than understand it.

It's disappointing, but I do listen to BPP in the afternoon if I'm 
working in the lab.  It was a pleasant surprise to hear you serendipitously.

jeff


Tom Van Baak wrote:
 Following the WIRED article, here's an NPR time nuts interview:
 
 http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=17345235
 
 Not sure it came out quite right; I can see now that talking live
 with off-the-wall questions is a bit more difficult than slowly
 composing/editing email or web pages. Also next time I'll get
 them to pronounce my name right!
 
 /tvb (Van Baak: rhymes with JS Bach, or clock).
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Units of Fame

2007-12-14 Thread Jeff Mock
Well, if Lamm is the unit for for fame, Kath must be be the unit for 
stupidity, google will fill in the gaps.

The funniest one I heard is that the standard measure for ego is the 
Mandelbroit.  If you've ever heard him speak, you can see that like the 
Farad it's most often found as pico- or micro- in the field...

jeff

Doug Millar wrote:
 
   I believe the unit of fame time is the Lamm  and is related to the 
 standard second at  one to one.
   He wrote the one hit wonder, Does Anybody Really Know What Time it Is?
   That is my offering. Perhaps other names come to mind. Submit yours 
 and we can vote.  The trouble is that given fifteen minutes of fame, 
 it is easy to forget who they are!
   Doug Millar


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] SVN37 offline

2007-12-12 Thread Jeff Mock
I'm sure you all noticed, SVN37 (PRN07) went offline today.  I tracked 
it yesterday afternoon, but it is gone today:

http://www.mock.com/test/z3801a/

Looks like it might be gone for good, now we only have 29 GPS satellites 
online...
ftp://tycho.usno.navy.mil/pub/gps/gps.txt

jeff


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] need recomendation for a portable 10mhz referenceoscilator

2007-12-11 Thread Jeff Mock


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Bill,
  
 a Rubidium would take about 15 to 20 Watts, and they don't  usually work at 
 12V battery voltage typically.
  
 At 20 Watts we would consume 1.67A at 12V, so a (large) 80Ah car batt would  
 only last two days in best conditions at room temperature.
  
 If we add the OCXO power and low battery temperatures, then we are probably  
 down to 20 to 24 hours of operation or so.
  
 BTW: interestingly Lead battery capacity is also related to discharge  
 current, not just temperature.
  
 bye,
 Said
 

I think the situation is somewhat better than that.  I'm looking at my 
LPRO-101.  It's about 18-watts while warming up, but once the physics 
package is up to temp and locked, the power consumption drops to about 
5-watts.  The larger rubidium modules are probably more power hungry, 
but the small onces aren't so bad once they are running.  You still 
might need a trunk full of batteries though...

jeff


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Super stable BVA Quartz resonators... BVA??

2007-12-08 Thread Jeff Mock
Thanks for the description, it is very interesting.  I have a follow up 
question if you don't mind.

How does crystal aging look on a graph of temp versus frequency.  This 
graph has some temperature point where the slope of frequency variation 
goes to zero and the crystal is quite stable around this temperature.

What does this graph look like as a crystal ages?  Does the optimal 
operating temperature change over time, that is, does the graph tend to 
move left and right, or does aging tend to move the graph vertically 
(the optimal freq stays the same, but the optimal operating temperature 
changes as a result of aging).

I hope this makes sense...
jeff


Bernd T-Online wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 For explanation how the BVA works, please see the attached slide which 
 shows schematically its internal construction. (The explaning text is in 
 German, as it is from my periodically given crystal seminar.)
 The key points which yield the BVA's improved aging are, that
 - the whole resonator package is made from quartz, consisting of the 
 resonationg quartz plate in the middle section and the two mounting  
 sealing plaates on top and bottem - you may call it a Hamburger style ;-)
 - the resonating plate is held through quartz bridges rather than metal 
 suspensions, thus reducing mounting stress.
 - the BVA is electrodeless, as the electrodes are evaporated on the 
 inner side of the upper and lower mounting plates. Therefore no stress 
 between the quartz surface and the metal eletrode.
 - Therefore the energizing electrical field is applied through an 
 airgap, which represents two small load capacitors in series to the 
 resonator, thus making the resonator electrically stiffer and less 
 sensitive to circuit influences.
 
 On the other side you may imagine the main problems associated with such 
 a construction:
 - The difficulty to manufacture the convex and concave shaped parts with 
 such a precision, that the curvature yields a constant and very small 
 airgap.
 - To realize the fine adjustment to frequency, because the unit cannot 
 be tuned in the conventional way, i.e. by plating some metal on the 
 electrode.
 - The frequency accuracy to which the resonator has to manufactured, 
 because the resonator frequency cannot be pulled with the external 
 circuit elements by more than some hundred ppb.
 
 It may be interesting to note, that there was a company BVA 
 Industries, which wanted to generate their income solely from making 
 BVA - which failed. Maybe because of the cost could not be covered by 
 the revenues from the rather limited market.
 
 Bernd DK1AG
 __
 AXTAL GmbH  Co. KG
 Facility MOS
 Wasemweg 5
 D-74821 Mosbach / Germany
 fon: +49 (6261) 939834
 fax: +49 (6261) 939836
 www.axtal.com
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Cesium Oscialltors and Low Phase Noise Frequency Standard

2007-12-06 Thread Jeff Mock
It sounds like a really nice oscillator.  I'm sure that everyone would 
love to hear about the challenges and tradeoffs in designing such a high 
performance quartz oscillator.

Do you guys cut your own crystals? How much of the improvement comes 
from a better SC-cut crystal and how much from better electronics or 
better ovens? I could go on and on, you wouldn't want to sit next to me 
on a plane.

jeff


Martyn Smith wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Is there anyone out there clever enough to design me a cesium frequency 
 standard??
 
 There's only two manufacturers that I know of and there's room for another 
 supplier.
 
 Also you may be interested to read we have just developed what we believe to 
 be the worlds lowest close-in phase noise 10 MHz oscillator.
 
 It makes -121 dBc/Hz @ 1 Hz.  Noise floor is only -162 dBc/Hz at the moment, 
 but we are working on reducing this a further 5 to 10 dB.
 
 Enter your order number here..
 
 Best Regards
  
 Martyn
  
 This Email is from:
  
 Martyn Smith
 Precision Test Systems LTD
 Tel: +44 (0) 1245 329608
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Web: www.ptsyst.com
  
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP 8566B repair

2007-12-06 Thread Jeff Mock
Thanks so much, that's just the encouragement I need to crack open the 
RF section.  I'll take a look at the electrolytic caps you suggest. 
Assuming that I find something, do you think it's worth replacing other 
caps in the area figuring that they will also go bad soon enough?

jeff


John Miles wrote:
 Never fear.  I have seen this a few times, in a couple of 8566Bs that I have
 owned as well as in some others.  The YTO UNLOCK error always seems to come
 down to an open electrolytic on the YTO driver or pretune DAC boards, under
 the hinged plastic cover toward the rear of the RF section.
 
 Check power supply voltages first, then check ESR of all of the axial-lead
 electrolytics on all boards under that cover.  Then, if those areas are both
 OK, go through the YTO calibration procedure in the manual until you either
 successfully recalibrate the pretune/driver system, or reach a particular
 step that you can't complete.
 
 -- john, KE5FX
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Behalf Of Jeff Mock
 Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 7:38 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: [time-nuts] HP 8566B repair


 Does anyone have any suggestions or advice about 8566B repair?

 I've had an 8566B for 7-8 years, it's been a faithful tool, never had a
 problem with it.  It's reasonably clean unit that's never seen a tough
 life.  It sits in the storeroom 90% of the time and is on my bench maybe
 10% of the time.

 So, this week, after a 4 month hiatus, I've been using it on the bench
 and it starting producing a YTO UNLOCK message, the trace seems to
 basically work properly but is clearly unlocked and the trace will
 randomly slide to the left or right.  The Yttrium oscillator is clearly
 unlocked.  I'm hopeful that the problem is in one the control loops
 outside the oscillator module.

 I read the repair guide that Agilent kindly keeps on their website, they
 have some good instructions and narrow the problem to 3-4 modules, but
 I've never opened up the instrument and am a little apprehensive about
 making things worse.  My hunch is that the problem is an electrolytic
 cap that has dried out over the years and has failed.

 Any suggestions for either self repair or outside repair and
 re-calibration is appreciated...

 In full disclosure, I also have a 70908A based spectrum analyser that
 that has much better specs, especially in microwave. It can completely
 replace the 8566B, but I'm quite fond of the 8566B, I can operate it
 blind folded, it's like an old friend and I would really like to fix it.


 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] HP 8566B repair

2007-12-06 Thread Jeff Mock
Does anyone have any suggestions or advice about 8566B repair?

I've had an 8566B for 7-8 years, it's been a faithful tool, never had a 
problem with it.  It's reasonably clean unit that's never seen a tough 
life.  It sits in the storeroom 90% of the time and is on my bench maybe 
10% of the time.

So, this week, after a 4 month hiatus, I've been using it on the bench 
and it starting producing a YTO UNLOCK message, the trace seems to 
basically work properly but is clearly unlocked and the trace will 
randomly slide to the left or right.  The Yttrium oscillator is clearly 
unlocked.  I'm hopeful that the problem is in one the control loops 
outside the oscillator module.

I read the repair guide that Agilent kindly keeps on their website, they 
have some good instructions and narrow the problem to 3-4 modules, but 
I've never opened up the instrument and am a little apprehensive about 
making things worse.  My hunch is that the problem is an electrolytic 
cap that has dried out over the years and has failed.

Any suggestions for either self repair or outside repair and 
re-calibration is appreciated...

In full disclosure, I also have a 70908A based spectrum analyser that 
that has much better specs, especially in microwave. It can completely 
replace the 8566B, but I'm quite fond of the 8566B, I can operate it 
blind folded, it's like an old friend and I would really like to fix it.

jeff


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Modulation on Rb sources

2007-12-05 Thread Jeff Mock
I have a couple of Rb sources and went looking for spurs close to the 
carrier.  One was particularly surprising.  First is a GPS disciplined 
Rb oscillator from Berkeley Varitronics.  I'm not a big fan of this box, 
but that's another story.

Here's plot of 500Hz around 10MHz, it looks like the 10MHz signal is AM 
modulated with a 128Hz signal, the spurs are about -75dBc.  I did the 
plot twice, once during normal operation, and once with the GPS control 
loop disabled from the front panel.  The plots were identical.  So, my 
question is whether this modulation is part of the Efratom module or 
introduced by the Berkeley Varitronics box?

http://www.mock.com/test/rhinoii/am-128hz.png

Here's a similar plot of an LPRO-101.  This is just the module with a 
semi-crappy power supply.  There's a little 60Hz (+harmonics) that I 
figure is power supply related leaking through the mixer.  The 10MHz 
signal is +8dBm, so the 60Hz spurs are at least 98db below the carrier, 
much better than the previous graph and more like what I expected.

http://www.mock.com/test/lpro-101/am60hz.png

Does anyone know what's going on with the first box?

jeff


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Chronometer contest sponsored by IEEE Spectrum

2007-12-01 Thread Jeff Mock
I found this article randomly this evening, it has some interesting 
tidbits about quartz oscillators in watches.  I had never heard of the 
venerable Sieko twin quartz from 1978, good to +/- 5 seconds a year:

 
http://people.timezone.com/msandler/Articles/CarlosFinalParadigm/FinalParadigm.html

jeff


Max Robinson wrote:
 In my experience watches come from the factory adjusted to gain about 5 
 seconds a month.  The ones I have owned over the years seemed to be fairly 
 stable in that.  I have always wished there was a way for someone who is not 
 a watch maker to open up such a watch and turn the trimmer capacitor, there 
 has to be one, to set it right on.  Then it would be much easier to tell how 
 the crystal is aging.
 
 Regards.
 
 Max.  K 4 O D S.
 
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Transistor site http://www.funwithtransistors.net
 Vacuum tube site: http://www.funwithtubes.net
 Music site: http://www.maxsmusicplace.com


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] EU funds Galileo

2007-11-30 Thread Jeff Mock
As a hard working US tax payer, I'm happy that someone is paying for an 
excuse to buy another disciplined oscillator one day...  lots more 
plots, quibbling about differences in the 10 decimal point, etc.

jeff

Javier wrote:
 As a hard working ES tax payer, I think that the funds are right there 
 :) I prefer not to have exlusive dependence on DoD...
 
 Javier
 
 Rob Kimberley escribió:
 As a hard working UK tax payer, I'd rather my money was spent elsewhere -
 I'm more than happy with GPS!

 Rob K 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Magnus Danielson
 Sent: 30 November 2007 09:33
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: [time-nuts] EU funds Galileo

 Hi!

 Just heard this and here is some details:
 http://investing.reuters.co.uk/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=allBreakingNe
 wsstoryID=2007-11-29T235046Z_01_L29893386_RTRIDST_0_EU-GALILEO-UPDATE-3.XML

 Looks like it just became likelier that we will have those Galileo birds.

 Cheers,
 Magnus

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


   
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] More details on IEEE Spectrum clock competition

2007-11-30 Thread Jeff Mock
Philip,

I think this sounds pretty reasonable, here's my 2-cents worth.

I think calibration should be part of delivering the clock.  You can 
imagine a designer developing elaborate models for the timebase and you 
don't want to stifle creativity here.  I think calibration is part of 
the delivered clock and not done by the judges.  The clock should be 
settable by a layperson, but I think you should let people go wild 
calibrating the clock.

The two big enemies the designer fights will likely be environmental and 
aging.  I think you've covered a good environmental specification, but 
aging should be incorporated into the contest.  For example, a temp 
compensated xtal oscillator my be calibrated to well less than 0.1 ppm 
and look really fantastic for a few days, but the crystal might age 2-3 
ppm over the first year of operation.

I imagine running the contest over a few months.  At some submission 
date the clocks are collected at your office, set to the current time, 
and left to run for a few months (or however much time you have).  At 
the end of 3-months all of the clocks are measured and a winner is 
picked.   Maybe you can publish intermediate results for dramatic effect.

Tom Van Baak has a nice story on his website about how he got interested 
in precision timing, http://www.leapsecond.com/.  He wanted a clock that 
would be accurate to better than 1-second over a year so that he could 
appreciate and adjust the clock during a leapsecond.  I don't know how, 
but I think that it might be possible to build a clock for this contest 
that meets that criteria.  If so, I think the entries need a feature for 
measuring accuracy more precisely.  I suggest requiring that the entires 
have a BNC connector that outputs a TTL level pulse once per second, the 
rising edge of the signal marks the beginning of a second (this is 
usually just called a PPS signal).  The accuracy of the clock can be 
done visually to 1s resolution, finer measurement can be done with 
comparison against PPS from a GPS receiver.

jeff



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 A number of people have asked for more details on IEEE Spectrum's digital 
 clock competition, so we've formulated the following list. Throughout, the 
 idea is to build a clock that an ordinary person would want to use, in an 
 ordinary home. That's why we want a display that can be read with ease 
 from across a room.
 
 
 Operating environment and other specs for IEEE Spectrum's Digital 
 Clock Competition:
  
 --between 10 and 50 degrees C
 
 --between 0 and 100 percent relative humidity
 --with seven-segment LED display, no smaller than 0.56 inches
 --no limit on power
 --calibration should be within the grasp of a layman
 --lacking an oscilloscope here in the office, we will check 
 accuracy against a WWVB or GPS signal (other suggestions--even volunteers 
 to help in the judging--are welcome)
 --parts to be available from any of the big distributors 
 (RadioShack, Mouser, DigiKey, Maplin, etc.) or, in sufficient quantities 
 (100s, say) from a surplus store
 
 
 
 
 Philip E. Ross
 Senior editor
 IEEE Spectrum Magazine
 212 419 7562
 http://www.spectrum.ieee.org
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Chronometer contest sponsored by IEEE Spectrum

2007-11-29 Thread Jeff Mock

Jeffrey Pawlan wrote:
 
 On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, David Forbes wrote:
 It might be more fun to require that an OCXO be designed and built by
 the DIY-er out of commercially available crystals and resistors. That
 way, it's an engineering challenge instead of a procurement
 challenge, since IEEE is about engineering.
 --
 
 I second David's suggestion!   The only REAL challenge would be to design the
 circuitry. Otherwise this is just a rack  stack project which is not
 engineering.
 

I think it's a fantastic challenge.  I imagine starting with a design 
goal something like tvb's original leapsecond goal.  It would be kind of 
cool to have a $100 clock that met that criteria.

I don't think an off-the shelf OCXO timebase will be competitive at this 
price point. I'm not aware of an inexpensive SC-cut oscillator.

I think the parameters for the contest need to be tightened up. 
Temperature and environment are enemies for this kind of clock, I hope 
they specify the operating environment and time period for evaluation.

I think that I would start by looking at 32kHz watch crystals, I've 
often wondered how good a timebase you can make out of one.  The tempco 
is a parabola around 25C with a max slope of something like 0.05 PPM/C, 
so they are naturally a pretty good timebase with good aging 
characteristics. The crystals are really tiny,  maybe insulating it with 
a material that has an interesting heat of fusion along with a micro to 
model the physics of the parabolic shape of the crystal performance.

jeff


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Of rubidium life and piggy-bank anemia....

2007-11-29 Thread Jeff Mock


John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
 
 But on the other hand, having a free-running Rb that you calibrate
 against the Tbolt (or some other reference) every so often isn't a bad
 idea; it gives you a source that's independent of external factors.
 
 John

This was the road to hell for me :)  I bought a Z3801A (moral equivalent 
to the Trimble Thunderbolt) back in 2000.  I've happily used it as my 
house reference for both PPS and 10MHz for many years confident that I 
have a solid timebase.

For the last several years I've been designing spectrometers for radio 
telescopes and it's been convenient and sometimes essential to have a 
timebase that's not too much worse than a modern radio telescope.  I see 
the lock light, I make a few plots, and I get a warm feeling that I know 
what time it is.
http://www.mock.com/gps

I recently bought an Rb source for fun.  Nominally I use it as the 
timebase for my frequency counter and run everything else off of the 
z3801a.  Now I live in constant state of flux not really knowing what 
10MHz is anymore.  I need more clocks, my Rb source is amplifying my 
personality quirks.

jeff


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Chronometer contest sponsored by IEEE Spectrum

2007-11-29 Thread Jeff Mock

 I think that I would start by looking at 32kHz watch crystals, I've 
 often wondered how good a timebase you can make out of one.  The tempco 
 is a parabola around 25C with a max slope of something like 0.05 PPM/C, 
 so they are naturally a pretty good timebase with good aging 
 characteristics. The crystals are really tiny,  maybe insulating it with 
 a material that has an interesting heat of fusion along with a micro to 
 model the physics of the parabolic shape of the crystal performance.

 jeff

   
 Maybe an ensemble of watch crystal clocks and a PIC microprocessor  per 
 David Allan paper
 of some years ago. After testing you could assign deferent weighting to 
 the different clocks.
 
 Bill K7NOM
 

Yes, an ensemble of 32kHz crystals, I like it a lot.  Perhaps you can 
setup a temperature gradient from hot to cold across a number of 
crystals.  If the tempco for the crystal is really a parabola, each of 
the crystals can be a datapoint along the parabola of crystal 
performance.  With a little work you might be able to precisely 
calculate the maxima of the parabola and precisely set the frequency 
independent of temp and aging.  Ha!

jeff


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] OT: Prologix GPIB and HP3478A...

2007-11-28 Thread Jeff Mock

++eot_char is usually okay.  The particular problem I was hacking at the 
time was a screen dump from a Tek scope (TDS 754A).  The screen dump is 
an 8-bit binary file in a weird image format and you don't know exactly 
how many bytes are going to be dumped (~50k bytes), but it does set EOI 
with the last byte sent.

++eot_char doesn't work 100% since the chosen EOT character might be 
binary data or it might be the EOT character.  The reason I asked is 
that the solution would be cleaner if you could do a ++read eoi and 
then issue some other ++ query command to ask if EOI was set on the 
previous read.

jeff

Prologix wrote:
 Hello Jeff,
 
 Thanks for the compliments. Much appreciated.
 
 You may configure the Prologix adapter (using ++eot_enable and ++eot_char)
 to send (append, really) a user-specified character to USB ouput when it
 detects EOI. By checking for the character you can determine if EOI was
 asserted.
 
 Regards,
 Abdul
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Jeff Mock
 
 
 I have a slightly off-topic question about reads.  When issuing a 
 ++read eoi, is it possible to tell whether an EOI was actually 
 returned by the instrument or whether the read was terminated by timeout 
 or block size limitation?
 
 jeff
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Collecting raw timing data

2007-11-27 Thread Jeff Mock
Thanks so much, your description of collecting the raw timing data is 
really clear.  I like the technique of doing timing interval 
measurements from a slower known reference on one channel to a DUT on a 
second channel.  This definitely gets me started.

jeff


Didier Juges wrote:
 Jeff,
 
 I have a practical step by step example using the HP 5370, a reference
 oscillator (in  my case, a Thunderbolt GPSDO, but you could use the
 counter's time base if you know it to be better than your UUT), a test
 oscillator (in my case an HP 10811) and the free Plotter software from
 Ulrich Bangert on mu web page:
 
 http://www.ko4bb.com/Timing/FAQ-1.html
 
 Look for Practical Example near the bottom.
 
 Didier KO4BB
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Mock
 Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 1:13 PM
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: [time-nuts] Collecting raw timing data

 This is mostly a question for tvb.

 How are you collecting raw timing timing data to calculate a 
 typical Allan deviation plot?  Something like:

 http://www.leapsecond.com/museum/hp58503b/log19395v.gif

 I've been fiddling with my HP53132A to get the right 
 combination of settings to collect useful timing data for 
 making Allan deviation plots. 
   Any information on your general workflow from collecting 
 the raw data to making a plot is appreciated.

 thanks,
 jeff
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] OT: Prologix GPIB and HP3478A...

2007-11-27 Thread Jeff Mock

Prologix wrote:
 
 One solution is to turn read-after-write off (++auto 0) before connecting
 the adapter to 3478A, and then use ++read command to read one measurement at
 a time. Please see the manual (www.prologix.biz) for ++read command options.
 

I nearly always turn off auto mode on the prologix.  I've run into a 
number of slightly flaky problems when the prologix guesses to turn on 
the instrument to talk.  I've never noticed a performance penalty 
because I need to issue a ++read command to the prologix whenever I 
want to read something back.

I think the prologix device is great.  I'm a linux guy, I haven't used 
windows in many years.  NI has never really understood open source 
software.  It was always a pain to have a reliable driver for the NI 
GPIB PCI cards, so I was quite happy to find something like the Prologix 
device that is reliable and has drivers that are totally open source and 
distributed as part of the linux kernel.

I have a slightly off-topic question about reads.  When issuing a 
++read eoi, is it possible to tell whether an EOI was actually 
returned by the instrument or whether the read was terminated by timeout 
or block size limitation?

jeff


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Collecting raw timing data

2007-11-27 Thread Jeff Mock

Bruce Griffiths wrote:
 Jeff Mock wrote:
 Thanks so much, your description of collecting the raw timing data is 
 really clear.  I like the technique of doing timing interval 
 measurements from a slower known reference on one channel to a DUT on a 
 second channel.  This definitely gets me started.

 jeff

   
 An algorithm for unabiguously unwrapping the rollovers can be found in:
 http://horology.jpl.nasa.gov/papers/picket_uffc.pdf
 

Thanks, that's a nice paper, 3-pages, lots of short declarative 
sentences that make sense.  As I understand the problem, Fig. 1 in this 
paper is the key for collecting good data for measuring Allan variance.

jeff


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 53131A or 5370B

2007-11-10 Thread Jeff Mock
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY


Bernd T-Online wrote:
 Hi Tom,
 
 Tom Clark, K3IO wrote:
I have been a strong advocate for the 53131/2 counter since I first
encountered in in 1993. Most of my applications are for a time-interval
counter (TIC) measuring the time interval between an atomic clock and
GPS (see my Timing for VLBI papers at [1]http://gpstime.com). The two
reasons are
 1. It is simple and cheap and reliable, especially for the casual
user.
 2. It has a simple RS-232 printer interface that is really easy to
use. Rick Hambly used the 53131/2 simple interface to make his
Tac32Plus (and Multi) software packages into an integrated TIC
logging utility 
 
 My question: is there a penalty in timing, if the GPIB bus is used for 
 time interval measurement as compared to the RS-232 bus.
 This question may sound stupid, as I am do not write the test software 
 in our lab by myself, but get it done.
 

I have a 53132A, I've written code for both the GPIB and RS-232 
interfaces at various times.  The performance is about the same, I never 
noticed that one interface is faster than the other.  The performance is 
probably more driven by the pea-brained microcontroller in the box.

The 53131/2 are pretty well behaved boxes, I found them to be very 
reliable and easy program without too much fiddling.  Sometimes GPIB 
equipment can be pretty badly behaved, but the 53132A is great.

jeff



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.