Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A clock shaping (sine - square wave)

2012-01-03 Thread David
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 07:01:13 +0100, ehydra ehy...@arcor.de wrote:

David schrieb:
 I could analyze it on SPICE but I suspect the real world construction
 parasitics will be what limits the performance.  I just sketched it
 out in my notebook but I will see if I can post it somewhere.  Is
 there a quick and dirty online schematic capture site?

Scan it. I will make a LTspice file.

 
 It is not that complicated being a differential amplifier driving
 complementary pair of emitter followers, a pair of voltage clamps, and
 then a pair of complementary current mirrors configured as
 transconductance amplifiers.

I want to SEE it including all circuit parameters. Thank you.

I am entering it into LT Spice for practice.  I will post the results
and files here when done.  I need to rethink the level shift
configuration.

 When you say symmetry limiting do you mean to prevent second harmonic
 distortion like for driving a mixer?  I was thinking of this more for
 driving a single ended transmission line cleanly while maximizing the
 edge rates and minimizing jitter.  Duty cycle correction could be
 added pretty easily.

Hm. I think second harmonic distortion looks very much like intentional 
symmetric waveform in the first instance. The fun begins if we decide to 
look for equal time distance or equal power for both phases. Interesting.

 
 The circuit you linked is going to have a little problem since both
 the 2N5769 and the 2N5770 are NPN and the circuit requires a pair of
 PNPs.  Other than that it looks perfect for driving a high level
 mixer.

As far as I know driving a mixer was the circuit intention. I SPICEd it 
with BFR93 types. The circuit has a high reflection coefficient, 
unfortunately. Maybe this is unavoidable and we need a diplexer.

The output is low impedance, unmatched, and I suspect not quite
symmetrical so I would expect this.  Does it matter though if the
mixer is close by?

Yes, looks like an typo for having 4 NPNs there. I will clarify this 
with Chris Trask. Thanks.

Unfortunately, RF PNP transistors tend to be rare or expensive so when
I saw that schematic my first thought was, Hmm.  I wonder if that is
the RF PNP I have been looking for.  I did not know the 2N5770 had a
PNP complement.  Wait a sec . . .

I have been considering the PNP BFG21 and NPN BFG97 made by NXP.  They
are SOT-223 so should be easier to prototype with than a smaller
package.

The On Semiconductor TO-92 NPN MPSH10 and PNP MPSH81 would be good
also but the later is being discontinued.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A clock shaping (sine - square wave)

2012-01-02 Thread ehydra

Is it possible to sketch the circuit? I can SPICE it.

Symmetry limiting is the holy grail and it is questionable if a discrete 
design is way better than one of the chips.



Here is another limiter circuit (by Chris Trask):
http://ehydra.dyndns.info/NG/LTspice/Negative%20Impedance%20LO%20Driver.pdf


- Henry


David schrieb:

What kind of performance would you expect in this application?  Low
jitter?  50 ohm output?  TTL or better signal levels?  Fast rise and
fall times?  Duty cycle correction?

After reading your post I was thinking about how to go about it and
ended up with an 8 transistor discrete design using a differential
amplifier input and pair of current mirror transconductance amplifiers
for the output.  I have been looking into designing a pulse generator
for oscilloscope calibration and have an interest in GPSDOs so maybe I
will prototype this as well just to see what kind of performance a
bunch of 2N3904 and 2N4401 jelly bean transistors can provide.

On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:14:30 -0800, John Beale be...@bealecorner.com
wrote:

In case it's useful... there are many ways to get a square wave out from a 
sine wave in, but one straightforward way is with a comparator. Some work 
better than others. The slow ones won't work at all at 10 MHz, and the very 
fast comparators (MAX999, ADCMP600, LT1116 etc.) are more expensive, and 
perhaps harder to work with. I tried a MAX9013 in SO-8 package and it works 
well for the job. You can see my schematic, circuit and scope plots at the 
bottom of this page:



--
ehydra.dyndns.info

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A clock shaping (sine - square wave)

2012-01-02 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

In most cases it's a T section (two coils, one cap) low pass filter tacked on 
to the output of a logic gate (or FPGA output). Net result is a reasonable sine 
wave *if* you terminate it correctly. Based on the observations posted on the 
list, the filter in the FE-5680 seems to be set up for a 50 ohm resistive load 
and is mis-terminated when run into a scope probe. Not to surprisingly, you get 
a lot less output voltage into the correct load than into an open circuit. With 
a filter, the difference can be significantly more than 2:1. The logic gate / 
FPGA is putting out about 3 volts p-p, so that will be the filter went away 
output level. The matched value will be quite a bit lower to keep the gate / 
FPGA from going a bit nuts power wise. 

Bob


On Jan 2, 2012, at 9:52 AM, ehydra wrote:

 Is it possible to sketch the circuit? I can SPICE it.
 
 Symmetry limiting is the holy grail and it is questionable if a discrete 
 design is way better than one of the chips.
 
 
 Here is another limiter circuit (by Chris Trask):
 http://ehydra.dyndns.info/NG/LTspice/Negative%20Impedance%20LO%20Driver.pdf
 
 
 - Henry
 
 
 David schrieb:
 What kind of performance would you expect in this application?  Low
 jitter?  50 ohm output?  TTL or better signal levels?  Fast rise and
 fall times?  Duty cycle correction?
 After reading your post I was thinking about how to go about it and
 ended up with an 8 transistor discrete design using a differential
 amplifier input and pair of current mirror transconductance amplifiers
 for the output.  I have been looking into designing a pulse generator
 for oscilloscope calibration and have an interest in GPSDOs so maybe I
 will prototype this as well just to see what kind of performance a
 bunch of 2N3904 and 2N4401 jelly bean transistors can provide.
 On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:14:30 -0800, John Beale be...@bealecorner.com
 wrote:
 In case it's useful... there are many ways to get a square wave out from a 
 sine wave in, but one straightforward way is with a comparator. Some work 
 better than others. The slow ones won't work at all at 10 MHz, and the very 
 fast comparators (MAX999, ADCMP600, LT1116 etc.) are more expensive, and 
 perhaps harder to work with. I tried a MAX9013 in SO-8 package and it works 
 well for the job. You can see my schematic, circuit and scope plots at the 
 bottom of this page:
 
 
 -- 
 ehydra.dyndns.info
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A clock shaping (sine - square wave)

2012-01-02 Thread David
The output level and impedance is why I ended up with the circuit I
did.  The complementary transconductance output allows a near 5 volt
rail to rail swing from a 5 volt supply while driving a 50 ohm
transmission line and 50 ohm shunt termination to 5 volts on the
driver side.

It would be a power hog though with the output stage drawing about
100mA with a correctly terminated load which is why you would not
typically find it on an IC.

On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 10:41:01 -0500, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:

Hi

In most cases it's a T section (two coils, one cap) low pass filter tacked on 
to the output of a logic gate (or FPGA output). Net result is a reasonable 
sine wave *if* you terminate it correctly. Based on the observations posted on 
the list, the filter in the FE-5680 seems to be set up for a 50 ohm resistive 
load and is mis-terminated when run into a scope probe. Not to surprisingly, 
you get a lot less output voltage into the correct load than into an open 
circuit. With a filter, the difference can be significantly more than 2:1. The 
logic gate / FPGA is putting out about 3 volts p-p, so that will be the 
filter went away output level. The matched value will be quite a bit lower 
to keep the gate / FPGA from going a bit nuts power wise. 

Bob


On Jan 2, 2012, at 9:52 AM, ehydra wrote:

 Is it possible to sketch the circuit? I can SPICE it.
 
 Symmetry limiting is the holy grail and it is questionable if a discrete 
 design is way better than one of the chips.
 
 
 Here is another limiter circuit (by Chris Trask):
 http://ehydra.dyndns.info/NG/LTspice/Negative%20Impedance%20LO%20Driver.pdf
 
 
 - Henry
 
 
 David schrieb:
 What kind of performance would you expect in this application?  Low
 jitter?  50 ohm output?  TTL or better signal levels?  Fast rise and
 fall times?  Duty cycle correction?
 After reading your post I was thinking about how to go about it and
 ended up with an 8 transistor discrete design using a differential
 amplifier input and pair of current mirror transconductance amplifiers
 for the output.  I have been looking into designing a pulse generator
 for oscilloscope calibration and have an interest in GPSDOs so maybe I
 will prototype this as well just to see what kind of performance a
 bunch of 2N3904 and 2N4401 jelly bean transistors can provide.
 On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:14:30 -0800, John Beale be...@bealecorner.com
 wrote:
 In case it's useful... there are many ways to get a square wave out from a 
 sine wave in, but one straightforward way is with a comparator. Some work 
 better than others. The slow ones won't work at all at 10 MHz, and the 
 very fast comparators (MAX999, ADCMP600, LT1116 etc.) are more expensive, 
 and perhaps harder to work with. I tried a MAX9013 in SO-8 package and it 
 works well for the job. You can see my schematic, circuit and scope plots 
 at the bottom of this page:
 
 
 -- 
 ehydra.dyndns.info
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A clock shaping (sine - square wave)

2012-01-02 Thread David
I could analyze it on SPICE but I suspect the real world construction
parasitics will be what limits the performance.  I just sketched it
out in my notebook but I will see if I can post it somewhere.  Is
there a quick and dirty online schematic capture site?

It is not that complicated being a differential amplifier driving
complementary pair of emitter followers, a pair of voltage clamps, and
then a pair of complementary current mirrors configured as
transconductance amplifiers.

When you say symmetry limiting do you mean to prevent second harmonic
distortion like for driving a mixer?  I was thinking of this more for
driving a single ended transmission line cleanly while maximizing the
edge rates and minimizing jitter.  Duty cycle correction could be
added pretty easily.

The circuit you linked is going to have a little problem since both
the 2N5769 and the 2N5770 are NPN and the circuit requires a pair of
PNPs.  Other than that it looks perfect for driving a high level
mixer.

On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:52:18 +0100, ehydra ehy...@arcor.de wrote:

Is it possible to sketch the circuit? I can SPICE it.

Symmetry limiting is the holy grail and it is questionable if a discrete 
design is way better than one of the chips.


Here is another limiter circuit (by Chris Trask):
http://ehydra.dyndns.info/NG/LTspice/Negative%20Impedance%20LO%20Driver.pdf


- Henry


David schrieb:
 What kind of performance would you expect in this application?  Low
 jitter?  50 ohm output?  TTL or better signal levels?  Fast rise and
 fall times?  Duty cycle correction?
 
 After reading your post I was thinking about how to go about it and
 ended up with an 8 transistor discrete design using a differential
 amplifier input and pair of current mirror transconductance amplifiers
 for the output.  I have been looking into designing a pulse generator
 for oscilloscope calibration and have an interest in GPSDOs so maybe I
 will prototype this as well just to see what kind of performance a
 bunch of 2N3904 and 2N4401 jelly bean transistors can provide.
 
 On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:14:30 -0800, John Beale be...@bealecorner.com
 wrote:
 
 In case it's useful... there are many ways to get a square wave out from a 
 sine wave in, but one straightforward way is with a comparator. Some work 
 better than others. The slow ones won't work at all at 10 MHz, and the very 
 fast comparators (MAX999, ADCMP600, LT1116 etc.) are more expensive, and 
 perhaps harder to work with. I tried a MAX9013 in SO-8 package and it works 
 well for the job. You can see my schematic, circuit and scope plots at the 
 bottom of this page:

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A clock shaping (sine - square wave)

2012-01-02 Thread ehydra



David schrieb:

I could analyze it on SPICE but I suspect the real world construction
parasitics will be what limits the performance.  I just sketched it
out in my notebook but I will see if I can post it somewhere.  Is
there a quick and dirty online schematic capture site?


Scan it. I will make a LTspice file.




It is not that complicated being a differential amplifier driving
complementary pair of emitter followers, a pair of voltage clamps, and
then a pair of complementary current mirrors configured as
transconductance amplifiers.


I want to SEE it including all circuit parameters. Thank you.




When you say symmetry limiting do you mean to prevent second harmonic
distortion like for driving a mixer?  I was thinking of this more for
driving a single ended transmission line cleanly while maximizing the
edge rates and minimizing jitter.  Duty cycle correction could be
added pretty easily.


Hm. I think second harmonic distortion looks very much like intentional 
symmetric waveform in the first instance. The fun begins if we decide to 
look for equal time distance or equal power for both phases. Interesting.





The circuit you linked is going to have a little problem since both
the 2N5769 and the 2N5770 are NPN and the circuit requires a pair of
PNPs.  Other than that it looks perfect for driving a high level
mixer.


As far as I know driving a mixer was the circuit intention. I SPICEd it 
with BFR93 types. The circuit has a high reflection coefficient, 
unfortunately. Maybe this is unavoidable and we need a diplexer.


Yes, looks like an typo for having 4 NPNs there. I will clarify this 
with Chris Trask. Thanks.






Here is another limiter circuit (by Chris Trask):
http://ehydra.dyndns.info/NG/LTspice/Negative%20Impedance%20LO%20Driver.pdf


- Henry

--
ehydra.dyndns.info

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A clock shaping (sine - square wave)

2012-01-02 Thread John Beale

On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:14:30 -0800, John Beale be...@bealecorner.com
wrote:

In case it's useful... there are many ways to get a square wave out from
a sine wave in, but one straightforward way is with a comparator.  [...]


FWIW, I decided on a more straightforward way to get a square wave output 
from my FE-5680A:  bypass the internal sine-wave filter, and take the 
original 10 MHz output direct from the XC9572 CPLD ! (now, I vaguely 
recall, this may have already been described on the list...)


Here's a photo of the modification I did: unsolder and rotate the 15 ohm 
resistor on CPLD pin 49, so it now feeds a short ribbon cable, which runs 
through the hole in the case intended for the (non-working) trim pot:

https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/YkQseTWUZolGYd5VSwE9odMTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink

What the square wave looks like coming out through the cable, on a TDS-210 
with 10x probe, no termination load:

https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/lcFB0P5rEEd10K508nWCv9MTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink

I see a 10 MHz 3.3V square wave with ~5 ns risetime and about 0.3 Vpp of 
ringing, probably as good as I could expect with this scope and wiring 
arrangement. I suspect this way I will get better jitter performance than I 
could expect trying to square up the standard sine wave output by whatever 
means.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A clock shaping (sine - square wave)

2011-12-30 Thread David
What kind of performance would you expect in this application?  Low
jitter?  50 ohm output?  TTL or better signal levels?  Fast rise and
fall times?  Duty cycle correction?

After reading your post I was thinking about how to go about it and
ended up with an 8 transistor discrete design using a differential
amplifier input and pair of current mirror transconductance amplifiers
for the output.  I have been looking into designing a pulse generator
for oscilloscope calibration and have an interest in GPSDOs so maybe I
will prototype this as well just to see what kind of performance a
bunch of 2N3904 and 2N4401 jelly bean transistors can provide.

On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:14:30 -0800, John Beale be...@bealecorner.com
wrote:

In case it's useful... there are many ways to get a square wave out from a 
sine wave in, but one straightforward way is with a comparator. Some work 
better than others. The slow ones won't work at all at 10 MHz, and the very 
fast comparators (MAX999, ADCMP600, LT1116 etc.) are more expensive, and 
perhaps harder to work with. I tried a MAX9013 in SO-8 package and it works 
well for the job. You can see my schematic, circuit and scope plots at the 
bottom of this page:

https://picasaweb.google.com/bealevideo/FE5680A

My circuit works best with a sine wave input amplitude above 100 mVpp. 
Below that level, the duty cycle starts to become noticeably worse. I am 
using some hysteresis, but it may not be necessary.

Previous to those pics on the page, you also see a circuit which did not 
work so well, using a MAR-1 (broadband DC-1GHz MMIC amp). It's intended as 
a linear amp, and it does not saturate in a symmetric way even with large 
input signals.

Here are a few other circuits of interest, which I did not try:
http://www.ko4bb.com/~bruce/CLKSHPR.html
http://www.ko4bb.com/Timing/ClockShaper.php


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A clock shaping (sine - square wave)

2011-12-30 Thread Said Jackson
The spec is over the entire temp range, and it may not be linear to temp. It 
could be more sensitive at some temps than others.. Especially if the temp is 
digitally compensated inside the unit.

Sent From iPhone

On Dec 29, 2011, at 23:55, Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 9:14 PM, John Beale be...@bealecorner.com wrote:
 
 ...and by the way, my FE-5680A shows a consistent -7E-12 per degree C
 temperature sensitivity (measured at case temp 42 and 52 C).
 
 The spec says 3E-10 from -5C to 50C
 So (3E-10)/55 = 5.5E-12  and you got 7E-12   I'd say it close to
 what's advertized.
 
 Chris Albertson
 Redondo Beach, California
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A clock shaping (sine - square wave)

2011-12-30 Thread Don Latham
Heck- for a really good risetime, all you need is a mercury-wetted relay
:-)
Don

David
 What kind of performance would you expect in this application?  Low
 jitter?  50 ohm output?  TTL or better signal levels?  Fast rise and
 fall times?  Duty cycle correction?

 After reading your post I was thinking about how to go about it and
 ended up with an 8 transistor discrete design using a differential
 amplifier input and pair of current mirror transconductance amplifiers
 for the output.  I have been looking into designing a pulse generator
 for oscilloscope calibration and have an interest in GPSDOs so maybe I
 will prototype this as well just to see what kind of performance a
 bunch of 2N3904 and 2N4401 jelly bean transistors can provide.

 On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:14:30 -0800, John Beale be...@bealecorner.com
 wrote:

In case it's useful... there are many ways to get a square wave out
 from a
sine wave in, but one straightforward way is with a comparator. Some
 work
better than others. The slow ones won't work at all at 10 MHz, and the
 very
fast comparators (MAX999, ADCMP600, LT1116 etc.) are more expensive,
 and
perhaps harder to work with. I tried a MAX9013 in SO-8 package and it
 works
well for the job. You can see my schematic, circuit and scope plots at
 the
bottom of this page:

https://picasaweb.google.com/bealevideo/FE5680A

My circuit works best with a sine wave input amplitude above 100 mVpp.
Below that level, the duty cycle starts to become noticeably worse. I
 am
using some hysteresis, but it may not be necessary.

Previous to those pics on the page, you also see a circuit which did
 not
work so well, using a MAR-1 (broadband DC-1GHz MMIC amp). It's intended
 as
a linear amp, and it does not saturate in a symmetric way even with
 large
input signals.

Here are a few other circuits of interest, which I did not try:
http://www.ko4bb.com/~bruce/CLKSHPR.html
http://www.ko4bb.com/Timing/ClockShaper.php


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



-- 
Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument
are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind.
R. Bacon
If you don't know what it is, don't poke it.
Ghost in the Shell


Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] FE-5680A clock shaping (sine - square wave)

2011-12-29 Thread John Beale
In case it's useful... there are many ways to get a square wave out from a 
sine wave in, but one straightforward way is with a comparator. Some work 
better than others. The slow ones won't work at all at 10 MHz, and the very 
fast comparators (MAX999, ADCMP600, LT1116 etc.) are more expensive, and 
perhaps harder to work with. I tried a MAX9013 in SO-8 package and it works 
well for the job. You can see my schematic, circuit and scope plots at the 
bottom of this page:


https://picasaweb.google.com/bealevideo/FE5680A

My circuit works best with a sine wave input amplitude above 100 mVpp. 
Below that level, the duty cycle starts to become noticeably worse. I am 
using some hysteresis, but it may not be necessary.


Previous to those pics on the page, you also see a circuit which did not 
work so well, using a MAR-1 (broadband DC-1GHz MMIC amp). It's intended as 
a linear amp, and it does not saturate in a symmetric way even with large 
input signals.


Here are a few other circuits of interest, which I did not try:
http://www.ko4bb.com/~bruce/CLKSHPR.html
http://www.ko4bb.com/Timing/ClockShaper.php

...and by the way, my FE-5680A shows a consistent -7E-12 per degree C 
temperature sensitivity (measured at case temp 42 and 52 C). Has anyone 
else measured theirs?


-john beale


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A clock shaping (sine - square wave)

2011-12-29 Thread Chris Albertson
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 9:14 PM, John Beale be...@bealecorner.com wrote:

 ...and by the way, my FE-5680A shows a consistent -7E-12 per degree C
 temperature sensitivity (measured at case temp 42 and 52 C).

The spec says 3E-10 from -5C to 50C
So (3E-10)/55 = 5.5E-12  and you got 7E-12   I'd say it close to
what's advertized.

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.