Re: [time-nuts] New ISO8601 ?

[Ruslan Nabioullin]

So this new revision enables essentially for the encoding of ``ca.''?
Obviously the current revision allows for varying degrees of fixed
chronological granularity levels.

-Ruslan

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Dana Whitlow  wrote:
> I believe the phrase "circa 1967" fits the bill pretty well, although
> it may fall a little bit short of "...but it’s all a bit of a blur”.
>
> Dana
>
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp 
> wrote:
>
>> 
>> In message <4bec82c4-583e-4632-8589-d898cc2bd...@n1k.org>, Bob kb8tq
>> writes:
>>
>> >I had never realized there was a format for expressing “I think it was
>> 1967 but it’s
>> >all a bit of a blur”.
>>
>> I think that is one of the major reasons for the revision.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
>> p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
>> FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
>> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
>> ___
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
>> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.



-- 
Ruslan Nabioullin
Wittgenstein Laboratories
rnabioul...@gmail.com
(508) 523-8535
50 Louise Dr.
Hollis, NH 03049
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] New ISO8601 ?

[Dana Whitlow]

I believe the phrase "circa 1967" fits the bill pretty well, although
it may fall a little bit short of "...but it’s all a bit of a blur”.

Dana

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp 
wrote:

> 
> In message <4bec82c4-583e-4632-8589-d898cc2bd...@n1k.org>, Bob kb8tq
> writes:
>
> >I had never realized there was a format for expressing “I think it was
> 1967 but it’s
> >all a bit of a blur”.
>
> I think that is one of the major reasons for the revision.
>
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] New ISO8601 ?

[Bob kb8tq]

HI

> On Nov 23, 2017, at 8:18 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp  wrote:
> 
> 
> In message <4bec82c4-583e-4632-8589-d898cc2bd...@n1k.org>, Bob kb8tq writes:
> 
>> I had never realized there was a format for expressing “I think it was 1967 
>> but it’s
>> all a bit of a blur”. 
> 
> I think that is one of the major reasons for the revision.

That’s the way I read it. It’s all a bit of a blur so I could be wrong … :)

Bob

> 
> 
> -- 
> Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] New ISO8601 ?

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

In message <4bec82c4-583e-4632-8589-d898cc2bd...@n1k.org>, Bob kb8tq writes:

>I had never realized there was a format for expressing “I think it was 1967 
>but it’s
>all a bit of a blur”. 

I think that is one of the major reasons for the revision.


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] New ISO8601 ?

[Bob kb8tq]

Hi

I had never realized there was a format for expressing “I think it was 1967 but 
it’s
all a bit of a blur”. 

Bob

> On Nov 23, 2017, at 4:57 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp  wrote:
> 
> Seems there is an ISO8601 revision in progress ?
> 
> https://www.loc.gov/standards/datetime/
> 
> -- 
> Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

[time-nuts] New ISO8601 ?

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

Seems there is an ISO8601 revision in progress ?

https://www.loc.gov/standards/datetime/

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.