So this new revision enables essentially for the encoding of ``ca.''? Obviously the current revision allows for varying degrees of fixed chronological granularity levels.
-Ruslan On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Dana Whitlow <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe the phrase "circa 1967" fits the bill pretty well, although > it may fall a little bit short of "...but it’s all a bit of a blur”. > > Dana > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> -------- >> In message <[email protected]>, Bob kb8tq >> writes: >> >> >I had never realized there was a format for expressing “I think it was >> 1967 but it’s >> >all a bit of a blur”. >> >> I think that is one of the major reasons for the revision. >> >> >> -- >> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 >> [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 >> FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe >> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ >> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. -- Ruslan Nabioullin Wittgenstein Laboratories [email protected] (508) 523-8535 50 Louise Dr. Hollis, NH 03049 _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
