Re: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service
Esa Heikkinenwrote: > > Only Google may be stupid enough to grow one second lasting minor timing > issue to ten hours lasting serious timing issue with even longer effects Not only Google... https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/leapsecs/2016-September/006291.html Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch http://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h punycode Fisher, German Bight: Northwest 6 to gale 8, veering north 5 to 7. Rough or very rough. Occasional rain. Moderate, occasionally poor. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Gary E. Millerwrote: > Yo Michael! > > On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:21:39 + > Michael Rothwell wrote: > > > ... was just announced. > > https://cloudplatform.googleblog.com/2016/11/making- > every-leap-second-count-with-our-new-public-NTP-servers.html?m=1 > > I sort of see where they are coming from, but this will cause problems. > > The NTP packets google sends out have no way to be marked as 'not UTC'. > Given how promiscuous people are sharing NTP chimers these 'not UTC' > chimers will get into the mix. When they diverge from the real UTC servers > it will sorely confuse NTP clients. > No, not confused at all NTP is designed to detect this problem. The Google servers will be detected as "False Tickers" and ignored. Of course some clients might be configured to look ONLY at Google servers but those people like did that on purpose because they wanted to wrong time. Anyone with a normal NTP client that uses several different servers will be fine. The for people who don't know how Ntp works, it is simple: If you (a human) ask a bunch of people "what time is it?" you would expect them all to give you the same answer (within the precision of their wrist watches) and if one person tells you something that is very different from everyone else. You do NOT become confused you just say to yourself "His watch must be wrong," then you ignore his answer." NTP clients do about this same thing. This is why we configure our NTP clients to query a wide and diverse group of servers, so as to detect problems. So,.. Google will not poison the pool e of NTP servers, Google's incorrect time will not propagate very far. > > I would support an RFC to mark the type a time an chimer is servings. > Not only smeared and UTC, but also TAI, UT, UT0, UT1, UT2, ET, TDT, TDB, > TT, TCG, TCB, GPS, etc... > No, that is the wrong way to do it. Then no one flavor of time has enough servers to make the system work. A better way is to agree that all NTP servers use UTC and then distribute the corrections from UTC to the other flavors and those who need to to the conversions can do so. > RGDS > GARY > > --- > Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 > g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 > > ___ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service
tn1...@nic.fi said: > I wonder what this stupid "leap smear" will do to NTP driftfiles. ... There was a report on that area mentioned here a while ago. As long as the smearing is slow enough, the client servers easily track the drift. There is a bump in their drift, but it's not a problem for ntp. It's on the same scale as a big change in temperature. If you are trying to use your drift as a thermometer, things will get screwed up. If you know the parameters of the smearing server, you could probably correct for it. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service
Michael Rothwell kirjoitti: ... was just announced. https://cloudplatform.googleblog.com/2016/11/making-every-leap-second-count-with-our-new-public-NTP-servers.html?m=1 I wonder what this stupid "leap smear" will do to NTP driftfiles. Only Google may be stupid enough to grow one second lasting minor timing issue to ten hours lasting serious timing issue with even longer effects if driftfiles will be adjusted to neet their temporary and changing non-standard clock rate. -- 73s! Esa OH4KJU ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service
On 11/30/2016 3:35 PM, Gary E. Miller wrote: > Not true. NTP has provision for arbitrrary extensions to an ntp packet. > > See RFC 5905. https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5905.txt section 7.3: HA! ntp (the implementation) doesn't follow the RFC, which says that ntp (the protocol) is supposed to count seconds in an epoch. It doesn't, it deliberately miscounts when there's a leap second. Instead of simply counting seconds like TAI, it's broken just like POSIX. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service
Yo Tom! On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:06:06 -0800 "Tom Van Baak"wrote: > From Gary Miller: > > You gotta start sometime. Now is a good time. This is not the > > first time Google has done this, and certainly will not be the > > last. It had bad consequences last time and they did not learn > > from that. > > This is not the fault of google. The big players will continue to > innovate and solve timing problems as long as the official scientific > and political world do nothing. This is not innovation, this is anarchy. We have standards that hard working people have build over decades. Ignoring the lessons of the past is a bad thing. Arbitrarily changing standards is the path to madness. > May I request that further discussion of this google / NTP / leap > second issue take place in ntp forums or the LEAPSECS list, and not > here on time-nuts. I'll continue to suggest this move to de...@ntpsec.org. There are many people on the NTP IETF committes there. RGDS GARY --- Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 pgpmnn5U7BFEP.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service
Yo Poul-Henning! On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 21:01:44 + "Poul-Henning Kamp"wrote: > > In message <20161130125857.7229b...@spidey.rellim.com>, "Gary E. > Miller" writes : > > >Not 'odd'. Fully specified in the RFC. Anyone that did not > >implement the spec gets what they deserve. > > Actually, anybody who does implement the spec *precisely* gets a lot > of things nobody should ever be at the receiving end of. If you know of any such thing I suggest you bring it up on de...@ntpsec.org. Several of the authors of the upcoming NTS spec hang out there. If you can document anything specific the NTPsec team would like to get it handled in their code and documentation. Currently they are turning around fixes in days for most issues. They have already changed a bit of their implementation of the RFC for security reasons and would do so for any new issues. Things like symetric mode are now automagically downgraded to a more secure client server mode. RGDS GARY --- Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 pgpYmPcH0LY9W.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service
>From Gary Miller: > You gotta start sometime. Now is a good time. This is not the first > time Google has done this, and certainly will not be the last. It had > bad consequences last time and they did not learn from that. This is not the fault of google. The big players will continue to innovate and solve timing problems as long as the official scientific and political world do nothing. May I request that further discussion of this google / NTP / leap second issue take place in ntp forums or the LEAPSECS list, and not here on time-nuts. Thanks, /tvb Moderator, http://leapsecond.com/time-nuts.htm ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service
Yo Bob! On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:42:58 -0500 Bob Campwrote: > I believe the point was: If you start tossing around packets that are > odd sized, it is likely to break a lot of existing code. Not 'odd'. Fully specified in the RFC. Anyone that did not implement the spec gets what they deserve. IMHO, better for a packet that can be misinterpreted be dropped, Like the new non-standard Google NTP. Unmarked these new packets can cause havoc. But, to be fair, some assert the spec is a bit ambiguous. So any extention should be a new RFC. Like Autokey. RGDS GARY --- Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 pgpMImyMn51mm.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Michael Rothwellwrote: > ... was just announced. > https://cloudplatform.googleblog.com/2016/11/making-every-leap-second-count-with-our-new-public-NTP-servers.html?m=1 Obvious outcome is obvious. Leap smear prevented faults between google systems but then created the problem that other things don't agree with google's timestamps-- and the leapseconds still cause problems for many other parties. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service
Yo Poul-Henning! On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 20:42:17 + "Poul-Henning Kamp"wrote: > > In message <20161130123506.63853...@spidey.rellim.com>, "Gary E. > Miller" writes : > > >Not true. NTP has provision for arbitrrary extensions to an ntp > >packet. > > Good luck getting that through firewalls after the lastest rounds > of NTP amplification attacks... Good, then we get the firewalls eventually fixed as well. Seems to me you gotta break things badly on the internet before they get fixed. RGDS GARY --- Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 pgprWCXwUYJyS.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service
Hi I believe the point was: If you start tossing around packets that are odd sized, it is likely to break a lot of existing code. Bob > On Nov 30, 2016, at 3:35 PM, Gary E. Millerwrote: > > Yo Poul-Henning! > > On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 20:31:09 + > "Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote: > >> >> In message , Bob Camp >> writes: >> I would support an RFC to mark the type a time an chimer is servings. Not only smeared and UTC, but also TAI, UT, UT0, UT1, UT2, ET, TDT, TDB, TT, TCG, TCB, GPS, etc… >>> >>> That would probably be a good point to make on the NTP list :) >>> >>> The gotcha is that there is essentially zero time to approve and >>> implement something like that before the end of next month … >> >> And no space in the NTP packets for the bits. > > Not true. NTP has provision for arbitrrary extensions to an ntp packet. > > See RFC 5905. https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5905.txt section 7.3: > >"The packet format consists of three components: the header itself, >one or more optional extension fields, and an optional message >authentication code (MAC). " > > RGDS > GARY > --- > Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 > g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 > ___ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service
In message <20161130123506.63853...@spidey.rellim.com>, "Gary E. Miller" writes : >Not true. NTP has provision for arbitrrary extensions to an ntp packet. Good luck getting that through firewalls after the lastest rounds of NTP amplification attacks... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service
Yo Poul-Henning! On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 20:31:09 + "Poul-Henning Kamp"wrote: > > In message , Bob Camp > writes: > > >> I would support an RFC to mark the type a time an chimer is > >> servings. Not only smeared and UTC, but also TAI, UT, UT0, UT1, > >> UT2, ET, TDT, TDB, TT, TCG, TCB, GPS, etc… > > > >That would probably be a good point to make on the NTP list :) > > > >The gotcha is that there is essentially zero time to approve and > >implement something like that before the end of next month … > > And no space in the NTP packets for the bits. Not true. NTP has provision for arbitrrary extensions to an ntp packet. See RFC 5905. https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5905.txt section 7.3: "The packet format consists of three components: the header itself, one or more optional extension fields, and an optional message authentication code (MAC). " RGDS GARY --- Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 pgpUSSUYUuUTc.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service
Yo Bob! On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:26:34 -0500 Bob Campwrote: > > I would support an RFC to mark the type a time an chimer is > > servings. Not only smeared and UTC, but also TAI, UT, UT0, UT1, > > UT2, ET, TDT, TDB, TT, TCG, TCB, GPS, etc… > > > That would probably be a good point to make on the NTP list :) Already done. In private and on BTPsec. > The gotcha is that there is essentially zero time to approve and > implement something like that before the end of next month … You gotta start sometime. Now is a good time. This is not the first time Google has done this, and certainly will not be the last. It had bad consequences last time and they did not learn from that. RGDS GARY --- Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 pgpsVDFQXsdbN.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service
In message, Bob Camp writes: >> I would support an RFC to mark the type a time an chimer is servings. >> Not only smeared and UTC, but also TAI, UT, UT0, UT1, UT2, ET, TDT, TDB, >> TT, TCG, TCB, GPS, etc… > >That would probably be a good point to make on the NTP list :) > >The gotcha is that there is essentially zero time to approve and implement >something like that before the end of next month … And no space in the NTP packets for the bits. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service
Hi > On Nov 30, 2016, at 3:14 PM, Gary E. Millerwrote: > > Yo Michael! > > On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:21:39 + > Michael Rothwell wrote: > >> ... was just announced. >> https://cloudplatform.googleblog.com/2016/11/making-every-leap-second-count-with-our-new-public-NTP-servers.html?m=1 > > I sort of see where they are coming from, but this will cause problems. > > The NTP packets google sends out have no way to be marked as 'not UTC'. > Given how promiscuous people are sharing NTP chimers these 'not UTC' > chimers will get into the mix. When they diverge from the real UTC servers > it will sorely confuse NTP clients. > > I would support an RFC to mark the type a time an chimer is servings. > Not only smeared and UTC, but also TAI, UT, UT0, UT1, UT2, ET, TDT, TDB, > TT, TCG, TCB, GPS, etc… That would probably be a good point to make on the NTP list :) The gotcha is that there is essentially zero time to approve and implement something like that before the end of next month … Bob > > RGDS > GARY > --- > Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 > g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 > ___ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service
Yo Michael! On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:21:39 + Michael Rothwellwrote: > ... was just announced. > https://cloudplatform.googleblog.com/2016/11/making-every-leap-second-count-with-our-new-public-NTP-servers.html?m=1 I sort of see where they are coming from, but this will cause problems. The NTP packets google sends out have no way to be marked as 'not UTC'. Given how promiscuous people are sharing NTP chimers these 'not UTC' chimers will get into the mix. When they diverge from the real UTC servers it will sorely confuse NTP clients. I would support an RFC to mark the type a time an chimer is servings. Not only smeared and UTC, but also TAI, UT, UT0, UT1, UT2, ET, TDT, TDB, TT, TCG, TCB, GPS, etc... RGDS GARY --- Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 pgpy34_dNU98_.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service
In message <706C789A8B5440B3911A8A02C93E3E54@Alta>, "David J Taylor" writes: >Hope it doesn't mess up too many folk. It's completely against the >recommendations, of course. But in difference from these, it actually works. Trust me, they'll get thousands of users... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service
Subject: [time-nuts] Google public NTP service ... was just announced. https://cloudplatform.googleblog.com/2016/11/making-every-leap-second-count-with-our-new-public-NTP-servers.html?m=1 ___ One "service" I will /not/ be using. Hope it doesn't mess up too many folk. It's completely against the recommendations, of course. David -- SatSignal Software - Quality software written to your requirements Web: http://www.satsignal.eu Email: david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk Twitter: @gm8arv ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.