Re: [time-nuts] powering Trimble Thunderbolt with -5V rather than -12V

2013-10-31 Thread Robert Atkinson
Hi,
Interesting investigation, thanks for sharing. Another option I have used was 
+12V  +5V  with the -12V rail powered by a 9V output isolated DC-DC converter 
from an old thin ethernet network card. These come in either 5V or 12V input 
and are effecitvely free (you also get 10MHz isolaton transformers filters and 
Balun on most cards). They are the fat 24pin DIL module. A little additional 
filtering may be desirable. So they work on -9V to0. this then just needs a 
+12V +5V disk drive type supply (linear) and the DC-DC converter. I still think 
the Condor / PowerOne HTTA 16W linear open frame supply (e.g. ebay item 
221307930971 no connection) is the best solution though.
 
Robert G8RPI. 
 From: Stewart Cobb stewart.c...@gmail.com
To: time-nuts@febo.com 
Sent: Thursday, 31 October 2013, 6:11
Subject: [time-nuts] powering Trimble Thunderbolt with -5V rather than -12V
  

Executive summary:  you can power a surplus gold Thunderbolt using a
-5V supply in place of a -12V supply, and it will probably work just
fine.

Details:  The manual for Trimble Thunderbolts specifies power supplies
of +5V, +12V, and -12V.  It turns out that power supplies that provide
+5V, +12V, and -5V are easier to obtain locally.  I began to wonder
what circuitry in the Thunderbolt required -12V, and whether it would
run just as well on -5V.  So I took one apart and started probing.

As far as I can tell, the -12V supply goes to only two places.  One is
the negative supply pin for the quad op-amp (LT1014) in the DAC
circuit for the OCXO.  The other is a strange little circuit involving
a 2N3904 (SOT-23 marked 1A) near the 232 driver chip, right next to
the serial port.  This circuit seems to be comparing the -12V input
with one of the charge-pump pins on the 232 chip.  Its output (?)
connects to a test point labeled MON.  I assumed this was
non-critical and decided to ignore it.

The LT1014 op-amp is rated for operation on supply voltage as little
as 5V and as much as 30V (+/- 15V).  The spec sheet says the output
saturates about (1V typical / 3.5V max over temperature) above the
negative supply.  Presumably, if the op-amp is not asked to generate
output voltages lower than -1.5V, it should run fine with a -5V
negative supply.
The only negative voltages I could find, probing around the op-amp
circuit, were generated by AC-coupling digital square waves.  None of
the op-amp outputs were negative.  (My DAC steady-state value was
around +300mV, which appeared many places in the circuit.  Presumably
a slightly negative DAC value would also appear in many places, but as
long as it's greater than -1500mV, it won't matter.)

Armed with theoretical and practical confirmation that this should
work, I tried it.  And, oddly enough, it appears to be working.  Two
different Thunderbolts have been powered by +5/+12/-5 supplies, and
both have settled down and started tracking exactly as one would
expect.  For one, the settled DAC voltage was within a few
millivolts of the value it had on the specified power supplies,
shortly before the change.  The other had not been powered on for a
while and is still settling, but it seems happy.

There is a subtle possibility for concern, in that the sensitive DAC
signals near ground are now about 3.5V away from the center of the
op-amp supply range.  This could theoretically cause increased
distortion, offset, or offset drift due to the larger common-mode
voltage on the op-amp inputs.  In practice, it does not appear to be
an issue.

This note applies to the common surplus Thunderbolts in the
gold-anodized box, with the Trimble-branded OCXO.  All of those I've
tried seem to settle with DAC voltages near zero.  If you try this
with another style of Thunderbolt, you're on your own.

Cheers!
--Stu
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] powering Trimble Thunderbolt with -5V rather than -12V

2013-10-31 Thread Mark C. Stephens
A popular solution down under is to use a 555 timer driving a charge pump to 
generate negative rails from a single positive supply.

Example here:  http://www.vk2hmc.net/blog/?p=970

Hi all  - I'm back :)


--marki

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf 
Of Stewart Cobb
Sent: Thursday, 31 October 2013 5:12 PM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] powering Trimble Thunderbolt with -5V rather than -12V

Executive summary:  you can power a surplus gold Thunderbolt using a -5V supply 
in place of a -12V supply, and it will probably work just fine.

Details:  The manual for Trimble Thunderbolts specifies power supplies of +5V, 
+12V, and -12V.  It turns out that power supplies that provide
+5V, +12V, and -5V are easier to obtain locally.  I began to wonder
what circuitry in the Thunderbolt required -12V, and whether it would run just 
as well on -5V.  So I took one apart and started probing.

As far as I can tell, the -12V supply goes to only two places.  One is the 
negative supply pin for the quad op-amp (LT1014) in the DAC circuit for the 
OCXO.  The other is a strange little circuit involving a 2N3904 (SOT-23 marked 
1A) near the 232 driver chip, right next to the serial port.  This circuit 
seems to be comparing the -12V input with one of the charge-pump pins on the 
232 chip.  Its output (?) connects to a test point labeled MON.  I assumed 
this was non-critical and decided to ignore it.

The LT1014 op-amp is rated for operation on supply voltage as little as 5V and 
as much as 30V (+/- 15V).  The spec sheet says the output saturates about (1V 
typical / 3.5V max over temperature) above the negative supply.  Presumably, if 
the op-amp is not asked to generate output voltages lower than -1.5V, it should 
run fine with a -5V negative supply.
The only negative voltages I could find, probing around the op-amp circuit, 
were generated by AC-coupling digital square waves.  None of the op-amp outputs 
were negative.  (My DAC steady-state value was around +300mV, which appeared 
many places in the circuit.  Presumably a slightly negative DAC value would 
also appear in many places, but as long as it's greater than -1500mV, it won't 
matter.)

Armed with theoretical and practical confirmation that this should work, I 
tried it.  And, oddly enough, it appears to be working.  Two different 
Thunderbolts have been powered by +5/+12/-5 supplies, and both have settled 
down and started tracking exactly as one would expect.  For one, the settled 
DAC voltage was within a few millivolts of the value it had on the specified 
power supplies, shortly before the change.  The other had not been powered on 
for a while and is still settling, but it seems happy.

There is a subtle possibility for concern, in that the sensitive DAC signals 
near ground are now about 3.5V away from the center of the op-amp supply range. 
 This could theoretically cause increased distortion, offset, or offset drift 
due to the larger common-mode voltage on the op-amp inputs.  In practice, it 
does not appear to be an issue.

This note applies to the common surplus Thunderbolts in the gold-anodized box, 
with the Trimble-branded OCXO.  All of those I've tried seem to settle with DAC 
voltages near zero.  If you try this with another style of Thunderbolt, you're 
on your own.

Cheers!
--Stu
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.