Re: [Tinycc-devel] plans to 0.9.28

2017-09-24 Thread Christian Jullien
While mod after you last commit works great on
Windows 32/64
Rpi arm

It has one issue on Aarch64 (yet I don't know if it is related to your last
commit or not):

jullien@gcc113:~/tinycc$ uname -a
Linux gcc113 3.13.0-92-generic #139-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 28 20:45:34 UTC 2016
aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux

Test: 95_bitfields...
--- 95_bitfields.expect 2017-09-24 10:50:04.240209938 -0700
+++ 95_bitfields.output 2017-09-24 10:50:43.236414994 -0700
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
  TEST 6 
 bits in use : 007000FF
 bits as set : 0030002001FD0004
-values  : 01 02 03 04 fffd
+values  : 01 02 03 04 fd
 align/size  : 4 12


@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
  TEST 6 - PACKED 
 bits in use : 007000FF
 bits as set : 0030002001FD0004
-values  : 01 02 03 04 fffd
+values  : 01 02 03 04 fd
 align/size  : 1 10


@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
  TEST 6 - WITH ALIGN 
 bits in use : 007000FF
 bits as set : 0030002001FD0004
-values  : 01 02 03 04 fffd
+values  : 01 02 03 04 fd
 align/size  : 4 12


@@ -145,5 +145,5 @@
  TEST 6 - PACKED - WITH ALIGN 
 bits in use : 007000FF
 bits as set : 0030002001FD0004
-values  : 01 02 03 04 fffd
+values  : 01 02 03 04 fd
 align/size  : 1 10
make[2]: *** [95_bitfields.test] Error 1
Test: 95_bitfields_ms...
--- 95_bitfields_ms.expect  2017-09-24 10:50:04.240209938 -0700
+++ 95_bitfields_ms.output  2017-09-24 10:50:43.246414020 -0700
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
  TEST 6 - MS-BITFIELDS 
 bits in use : 007000FF
 bits as set : 0030200100FD0004
-values  : 01 02 03 04 fffd
+values  : 01 02 03 04 fd
 align/size  : 4 20


@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
  TEST 6 - MS-BITFIELDS - PACKED 
 bits in use : 70FF
 bits as set : 302001FD0004
-values  : 01 02 03 04 fffd
+values  : 01 02 03 04 fd
 align/size  : 1 14


@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
  TEST 6 - MS-BITFIELDS - WITH ALIGN 
 bits in use : 007000FF
 bits as set : 0030200100FD0004
-values  : 01 02 03 04 fffd
+values  : 01 02 03 04 fd
 align/size  : 4 20


@@ -145,5 +145,5 @@
  TEST 6 - MS-BITFIELDS - PACKED - WITH ALIGN 
 bits in use : 70FF
 bits as set : 302001FD0004
-values  : 01 02 03 04 fffd
+values  : 01 02 03 04 fd
 align/size  : 1 14
make[2]: *** [95_bitfields_ms.test] Error 1

-Original Message-
From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org]
On Behalf Of Christian Jullien
Sent: dimanche 24 septembre 2017 19:40
To: 'grischka'; tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] plans to 0.9.28

Very nice indeed.

I offer you my time to test every attempts on:

Windows x86/x64
Linux x86/x64
RPi arm
Aarch64


-Original Message-
From: grischka [mailto:gris...@gmx.de]
Sent: dimanche 24 septembre 2017 19:10
To: Christian JULLIEN; tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] plans to 0.9.28

Hi,

I just pushed a patch for more complete 'long' support (which was started by
Matthias Gatto for _Generic), as well as with eome improvements for
multicharacter constants:

http://repo.or.cz/tinycc.git/commitdiff/1443039416dd02750765efde1af35e31c8d4
1be3

So, now, basically, I'd agree to, including the offer to undertake the
necessary steps, to release this, say after some weeks of for finel testing,
as
 ___ 0.9.27 ___.

What do people think?

-- gr

Christian JULLIEN wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> 
> Last December, we where close to release 0.9.28 but more than 6 months 
> later, I see no plans for an imminent 0.9.28 release.
> 
> I'm fortunate to know how to build tcc on the many machines I use but 
> also see many users trying to use a very old 0.9.27 version.
> 
> I think it's time to release 0.9.28 and start new dev. on 0.9.29 IMHO,
> 
> - we should decide what we really want to implement before we release
> 0.9.28 and propose an ETA for implementation
> 
> - enter a bug fix, validation cycle (no new feature or gratuitous
> changes)
> 
> - check all ports (Windows 32/64, Linux x86, x64, arm, Aarch64, 
> more?), I will test all of them
> 
> - Make 0.9.28
> 
> 
> Sounds reasonable to you?
> 
> 
> --
> --
> 
> ___
> Tinycc-devel mailing list
> Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel



___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel


___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel


Re: [Tinycc-devel] plans to 0.9.28

2017-09-24 Thread Christian Jullien
Very nice indeed.

I offer you my time to test every attempts on:

Windows x86/x64
Linux x86/x64
RPi arm
Aarch64


-Original Message-
From: grischka [mailto:gris...@gmx.de] 
Sent: dimanche 24 septembre 2017 19:10
To: Christian JULLIEN; tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] plans to 0.9.28

Hi,

I just pushed a patch for more complete 'long' support (which was started by
Matthias Gatto for _Generic), as well as with eome improvements for
multicharacter constants:

http://repo.or.cz/tinycc.git/commitdiff/1443039416dd02750765efde1af35e31c8d4
1be3

So, now, basically, I'd agree to, including the offer to undertake the
necessary steps, to release this, say after some weeks of for finel testing,
as
 ___ 0.9.27 ___.

What do people think?

-- gr

Christian JULLIEN wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> 
> Last December, we where close to release 0.9.28 but more than 6 months 
> later, I see no plans for an imminent 0.9.28 release.
> 
> I'm fortunate to know how to build tcc on the many machines I use but 
> also see many users trying to use a very old 0.9.27 version.
> 
> I think it's time to release 0.9.28 and start new dev. on 0.9.29 IMHO,
> 
> - we should decide what we really want to implement before we release
> 0.9.28 and propose an ETA for implementation
> 
> - enter a bug fix, validation cycle (no new feature or gratuitous 
> changes)
> 
> - check all ports (Windows 32/64, Linux x86, x64, arm, Aarch64, 
> more?), I will test all of them
> 
> - Make 0.9.28
> 
> 
> Sounds reasonable to you?
> 
> 
> --
> --
> 
> ___
> Tinycc-devel mailing list
> Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel



___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel


Re: [Tinycc-devel] plans to 0.9.28

2017-09-24 Thread grischka

Hi,

I just pushed a patch for more complete 'long' support (which was started
by Matthias Gatto for _Generic), as well as with eome improvements for
multicharacter constants:

http://repo.or.cz/tinycc.git/commitdiff/1443039416dd02750765efde1af35e31c8d41be3

So, now, basically, I'd agree to, including the offer to undertake the
necessary steps, to release this, say after some weeks of for finel testing,
as
___ 0.9.27 ___.

What do people think?

-- gr

Christian JULLIEN wrote:


Hi all,


Last December, we where close to release 0.9.28 but more than 6 months 
later, I see no plans for an imminent 0.9.28 release.


I'm fortunate to know how to build tcc on the many machines I use but 
also see many users trying to use a very old 0.9.27 version.


I think it's time to release 0.9.28 and start new dev. on 0.9.29
IMHO,

- we should decide what we really want to implement before we release 
0.9.28 and propose an ETA for implementation


- enter a bug fix, validation cycle (no new feature or gratuitous changes)

- check all ports (Windows 32/64, Linux x86, x64, arm, Aarch64, more?), 
I will test all of them


- Make 0.9.28


Sounds reasonable to you?




___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel




___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel


Re: [Tinycc-devel] plans to 0.9.28

2017-07-26 Thread Austin English
Yes please!

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 5:37 AM, David Mertens  wrote:
> +1
>
> David
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 6:33 AM, Christian JULLIEN  wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> Last December, we where close to release 0.9.28 but more than 6 months
>> later, I see no plans for an imminent 0.9.28 release.
>>
>> I'm fortunate to know how to build tcc on the many machines I use but also
>> see many users trying to use a very old 0.9.27 version.
>>
>> I think it's time to release 0.9.28 and start new dev. on 0.9.29
>>
>>
>> IMHO,
>>
>> - we should decide what we really want to implement before we release
>> 0.9.28 and propose an ETA for implementation
>>
>> - enter a bug fix, validation cycle (no new feature or gratuitous changes)
>>
>> - check all ports (Windows 32/64, Linux x86, x64, arm, Aarch64, more?), I
>> will test all of them
>>
>> - Make 0.9.28
>>
>>
>> Sounds reasonable to you?
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Tinycc-devel mailing list
>> Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
>  "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
>   Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
>   by definition, not smart enough to debug it." -- Brian Kernighan
>
> ___
> Tinycc-devel mailing list
> Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
>



-- 
-Austin
GPG: 14FB D7EA A041 937B

___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel


Re: [Tinycc-devel] plans to 0.9.28

2017-07-26 Thread David Mertens
+1

David

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 6:33 AM, Christian JULLIEN  wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
>
> Last December, we where close to release 0.9.28 but more than 6 months
> later, I see no plans for an imminent 0.9.28 release.
>
> I'm fortunate to know how to build tcc on the many machines I use but also
> see many users trying to use a very old 0.9.27 version.
>
> I think it's time to release 0.9.28 and start new dev. on 0.9.29
>
>
> IMHO,
>
> - we should decide what we really want to implement before we release
> 0.9.28 and propose an ETA for implementation
>
> - enter a bug fix, validation cycle (no new feature or gratuitous changes)
>
> - check all ports (Windows 32/64, Linux x86, x64, arm, Aarch64, more?), I
> will test all of them
>
> - Make 0.9.28
>
>
> Sounds reasonable to you?
>
> ___
> Tinycc-devel mailing list
> Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
>
>


-- 
 "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
  Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
  by definition, not smart enough to debug it." -- Brian Kernighan
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel