While mod after you last commit works great on Windows 32/64 Rpi arm It has one issue on Aarch64 (yet I don't know if it is related to your last commit or not):
jullien@gcc113:~/tinycc$ uname -a Linux gcc113 3.13.0-92-generic #139-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 28 20:45:34 UTC 2016 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux Test: 95_bitfields... --- 95_bitfields.expect 2017-09-24 10:50:04.240209938 -0700 +++ 95_bitfields.output 2017-09-24 10:50:43.236414994 -0700 @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ ---- TEST 6 ---- bits in use : 0000007000FFFFFFFFFFFFFF bits as set : 00000030002001FD00000004 -values : 01 02 03 04 fffffffd +values : 01 02 03 04 fd align/size : 4 12 @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ ---- TEST 6 - PACKED ---- bits in use : 007000FFFFFFFFFFFFFF bits as set : 0030002001FD00000004 -values : 01 02 03 04 fffffffd +values : 01 02 03 04 fd align/size : 1 10 @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ ---- TEST 6 - WITH ALIGN ---- bits in use : 0000007000FFFFFFFFFFFFFF bits as set : 00000030002001FD00000004 -values : 01 02 03 04 fffffffd +values : 01 02 03 04 fd align/size : 4 12 @@ -145,5 +145,5 @@ ---- TEST 6 - PACKED - WITH ALIGN ---- bits in use : 007000FFFFFFFFFFFFFF bits as set : 0030002001FD00000004 -values : 01 02 03 04 fffffffd +values : 01 02 03 04 fd align/size : 1 10 make[2]: *** [95_bitfields.test] Error 1 Test: 95_bitfields_ms... --- 95_bitfields_ms.expect 2017-09-24 10:50:04.240209938 -0700 +++ 95_bitfields_ms.output 2017-09-24 10:50:43.246414020 -0700 @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ ---- TEST 6 - MS-BITFIELDS ---- bits in use : 00000000000000700000FFFF000000FFFFFFFFFF bits as set : 000000000000003000002001000000FD00000004 -values : 01 02 03 04 fffffffd +values : 01 02 03 04 fd align/size : 4 20 @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ ---- TEST 6 - MS-BITFIELDS - PACKED ---- bits in use : 00000000700000FFFFFFFFFFFFFF bits as set : 000000003000002001FD00000004 -values : 01 02 03 04 fffffffd +values : 01 02 03 04 fd align/size : 1 14 @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ ---- TEST 6 - MS-BITFIELDS - WITH ALIGN ---- bits in use : 00000000000000700000FFFF000000FFFFFFFFFF bits as set : 000000000000003000002001000000FD00000004 -values : 01 02 03 04 fffffffd +values : 01 02 03 04 fd align/size : 4 20 @@ -145,5 +145,5 @@ ---- TEST 6 - MS-BITFIELDS - PACKED - WITH ALIGN ---- bits in use : 00000000700000FFFFFFFFFFFFFF bits as set : 000000003000002001FD00000004 -values : 01 02 03 04 fffffffd +values : 01 02 03 04 fd align/size : 1 14 make[2]: *** [95_bitfields_ms.test] Error 1 -----Original Message----- From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christian Jullien Sent: dimanche 24 septembre 2017 19:40 To: 'grischka'; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] plans to 0.9.28 Very nice indeed. I offer you my time to test every attempts on: Windows x86/x64 Linux x86/x64 RPi arm Aarch64 -----Original Message----- From: grischka [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: dimanche 24 septembre 2017 19:10 To: Christian JULLIEN; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] plans to 0.9.28 Hi, I just pushed a patch for more complete 'long' support (which was started by Matthias Gatto for _Generic), as well as with eome improvements for multicharacter constants: http://repo.or.cz/tinycc.git/commitdiff/1443039416dd02750765efde1af35e31c8d4 1be3 So, now, basically, I'd agree to, including the offer to undertake the necessary steps, to release this, say after some weeks of for finel testing, as ___ 0.9.27 ___. What do people think? -- gr Christian JULLIEN wrote: > > Hi all, > > > Last December, we where close to release 0.9.28 but more than 6 months > later, I see no plans for an imminent 0.9.28 release. > > I'm fortunate to know how to build tcc on the many machines I use but > also see many users trying to use a very old 0.9.27 version. > > I think it's time to release 0.9.28 and start new dev. on 0.9.29 IMHO, > > - we should decide what we really want to implement before we release > 0.9.28 and propose an ETA for implementation > > - enter a bug fix, validation cycle (no new feature or gratuitous > changes) > > - check all ports (Windows 32/64, Linux x86, x64, arm, Aarch64, > more?), I will test all of them > > - Make 0.9.28 > > > Sounds reasonable to you? > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
