Re: [TLS] esni-draft-13 suggestion
Hiya, On 09/08/2021 19:07, Christopher Wood wrote: On Thu, Aug 5, 2021, at 10:30 AM, Salz, Rich wrote: As you are an experienced reviewer, I really appreciate all your commentary, and I think an experienced, not-author, view is very useful! +1 -- thanks, Stephen! Most of the PRs have been reviewed and merged. There's a couple lingering PRs that we may want to close or punt. I just closed one and punted one, leaving none:-) Thanks, S. I'd prefer we resolve them in the next day or two, update the change log, and get the next version out. Of course, if folks are still reviewing and want or need more time, please let me know! Best, Chris OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
Re: [TLS] esni-draft-13 suggestion
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021, at 10:30 AM, Salz, Rich wrote: > As you are an experienced reviewer, I really appreciate all your > commentary, and I think an experienced, not-author, view is very useful! +1 -- thanks, Stephen! Most of the PRs have been reviewed and merged. There's a couple lingering PRs that we may want to close or punt. I'd prefer we resolve them in the next day or two, update the change log, and get the next version out. Of course, if folks are still reviewing and want or need more time, please let me know! Best, Chris ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
Re: [TLS] esni-draft-13 suggestion
As you are an experienced reviewer, I really appreciate all your commentary, and I think an experienced, not-author, view is very useful! ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
Re: [TLS] esni-draft-13 suggestion
Hiya, So I gave that a read through and created a pile of PRs. [1] I didn't go over the appendices. As I said, I'm fine if those are ignored - better to get -13 out than spend ages discussing. (I'm fine with chatting about 'em too for a bit of course.) Cheers, S. [1] https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pulls On 03/08/2021 21:58, Christopher Wood wrote: On Tue, Aug 3, 2021, at 1:51 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: On 03/08/2021 21:44, Christopher Wood wrote: Of course! We're happy to park the next version until the end of the week (or longer), if that would yield more reviews. Please send any editorial comments you have here on the list or as PRs against the draft, and we'll work to try and incorporate them. Great. I shouldn't need that long. I'll plan to do this tomorrow (Wed). If it'd be better to wait 'till some more PRs are merged that's fine just tell me when to start. Sounds good! Feel free to start at your earliest convenience. As of now, we weren't planning any more editorial changes for -13. Best, Chris OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
Re: [TLS] esni-draft-13 suggestion
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021, at 1:51 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > > On 03/08/2021 21:44, Christopher Wood wrote: > > Of course! We're happy to park the next version until the end of the > > week (or longer), if that would yield more reviews. Please send any > > editorial comments you have here on the list or as PRs against the > > draft, and we'll work to try and incorporate them. > > Great. I shouldn't need that long. I'll plan to do this > tomorrow (Wed). If it'd be better to wait 'till some > more PRs are merged that's fine just tell me when to > start. Sounds good! Feel free to start at your earliest convenience. As of now, we weren't planning any more editorial changes for -13. Best, Chris ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
Re: [TLS] esni-draft-13 suggestion
On 03/08/2021 21:44, Christopher Wood wrote: Of course! We're happy to park the next version until the end of the week (or longer), if that would yield more reviews. Please send any editorial comments you have here on the list or as PRs against the draft, and we'll work to try and incorporate them. Great. I shouldn't need that long. I'll plan to do this tomorrow (Wed). If it'd be better to wait 'till some more PRs are merged that's fine just tell me when to start. Cheers, S. OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
Re: [TLS] esni-draft-13 suggestion
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021, at 1:40 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Hiya, > > I see a bunch of activity in github that may be the precursor > to pushing out draft-13, which would be great. > > One (ignorable) suggestion - as we're aiming for this draft > to be the basis for ongoing experiments, just before pushing > the publish button, it might be no harm to give people a day > or so to review the github version, on the understanding that > the editors will only accept non-controversial editorial PRs > submitted over that short period. (And other comments/PRs > will not be accepted for -13.) Of course! We're happy to park the next version until the end of the week (or longer), if that would yield more reviews. Please send any editorial comments you have here on the list or as PRs against the draft, and we'll work to try and incorporate them. Thanks for flagging this and offering to review, Stephen. :-) Best, Chris ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
[TLS] esni-draft-13 suggestion
Hiya, I see a bunch of activity in github that may be the precursor to pushing out draft-13, which would be great. One (ignorable) suggestion - as we're aiming for this draft to be the basis for ongoing experiments, just before pushing the publish button, it might be no harm to give people a day or so to review the github version, on the understanding that the editors will only accept non-controversial editorial PRs submitted over that short period. (And other comments/PRs will not be accepted for -13.) If given a day to do that, I'd prioritise it. That said, this'd put more work on the editors, and maybe they don't have time right now, and things can be fixed later anyway, so it's very much ok to not do this. (I'm suggesting this as it's been ages since I read the whole thing through so if a few people in my situation did a read-through we might catch stuff that'd save work as we experiment.) Cheers, S. OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
