Re: [toaster] Possible doc error ?
On Feb 25, 2008, at 10:04 AM, Rick Macdougall wrote: Hi, One of my bussies was using the toaster to install a new server and came across this prereq. yum install gcc g++ gcc-g++ gdbm gdbm-devel openssl openssl-devel stunnel krb5-devel bzip2 bzip2-devel He really needed c++ and gcc=c++, not g++. Is this a typo ? The last time I checked, the RH rpm name was gcc-c++. But that was a while ago. Note that different distributions use different package names. What distribution are you using? Regards, Bill
Re: [toaster] Possible doc error ?
Bill Shupp wrote: On Feb 25, 2008, at 10:04 AM, Rick Macdougall wrote: Hi, One of my bussies was using the toaster to install a new server and came across this prereq. yum install gcc g++ gcc-g++ gdbm gdbm-devel openssl openssl-devel stunnel krb5-devel bzip2 bzip2-devel He really needed c++ and gcc=c++, not g++. Is this a typo ? The last time I checked, the RH rpm name was gcc-c++. But that was a while ago. Note that different distributions use different package names. What distribution are you using? Regards, Bill Hi, On your page it says gcc-g++, I believe it should say gcc-c++ It's a CentOS 5 install. Regards, Rick
Re: [toaster] Possible doc error ?
Bill Shupp wrote: On Feb 25, 2008, at 10:04 AM, Rick Macdougall wrote: Hi, One of my bussies was using the toaster to install a new server and came across this prereq. yum install gcc g++ gcc-g++ gdbm gdbm-devel openssl openssl-devel stunnel krb5-devel bzip2 bzip2-devel He really needed c++ and gcc=c++, not g++. Is this a typo ? The last time I checked, the RH rpm name was gcc-c++. But that was a while ago. Note that different distributions use different package names. What distribution are you using? Regards, Bill Hi, On your page it says gcc-g++, I believe it should say gcc-c++ It's a CentOS 5 install. Regards, Rick I couldn't find the gcc-g++ package on centos 4 and 5 also, gcc-c++ works fine though. It installs /usr/bin/g++ if you're concerned that it may not be available on the system.
