Bug report for Watchdog [2005/08/21]

[bugzilla]

+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID   |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned|
| | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved)   |
| |   +-+
| |   | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major |
| |   |   MIN=Minor   NOR=Normal  ENH=Enhancement   |
| |   |   +-+
| |   |   | Date Posted |
| |   |   |  +--+
| |   |   |  | Description  |
| |   |   |  |  |
|  278|Unc|Nor|2000-12-04|Bug in GetParameterValuesTestServlet.java file Bug|
|  279|Unc|Nor|2000-12-04|Logical Error in GetParameterValuesTestServlet Bug|
|  469|Unc|Nor|2001-01-17|in example-taglib.tld "urn" should be "uri" BugRat|
|  470|Unc|Nor|2001-01-17|FAIL positiveForward.jsp and positiveInclude.jsp B|
| 9634|New|Enh|2002-06-05|No tests exist for ServletContext.getResourcePaths|
|10703|New|Enh|2002-07-11|Need to test getRequestURI after RequestDispatcher|
|11336|New|Enh|2002-07-31|Test wrapped path methods with RD.foward()|
|11663|New|Maj|2002-08-13|JSP precompile tests rely on Jasper specific behav|
|11664|New|Maj|2002-08-13|A sweep is needed of all Watchdog 4.0 tag librarie|
|11665|New|Maj|2002-08-13|ServletToJSPErrorPageTest and ServletToServletErro|
|11666|New|Maj|2002-08-13|SetBufferSize_1TestServlet is invalid.|
|14004|New|Maj|2002-10-28|Incorrent behaviour of all attribute-related lifec|
|15504|New|Nor|2002-12-18|JSP positiveGetValues test relies on order preserv|
|24649|New|Nor|2003-11-12|getRemoteHost fails when agent has uppercase chara|
|29398|New|Nor|2004-06-04|Update site and note current status   |
|35058|New|Nor|2005-05-25|test  |
|35353|Unc|Min|2005-06-14|test  |
|35354|New|Nor|2005-06-14|ts|
|35395|New|Cri|2005-06-17|test  |
+-+---+---+--+--+
| Total   19 bugs   |
+---+

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug report for Tomcat 4 [2005/08/21]

[bugzilla]

+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID   |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned|
| | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved)   |
| |   +-+
| |   | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major |
| |   |   MIN=Minor   NOR=Normal  ENH=Enhancement   |
| |   |   +-+
| |   |   | Date Posted |
| |   |   |  +--+
| |   |   |  | Description  |
| |   |   |  |  |
| 3839|Opn|Enh|2001-09-26|Problem bookmarking login page|
| 4227|Opn|Enh|2001-10-17|Invalid CGI path  |
| 5329|New|Enh|2001-12-08|NT Service exits startup before Tomcat is finished|
| 5795|New|Enh|2002-01-10|Catalina Shutdown relies on localhost causing prob|
| 5829|New|Enh|2002-01-13|StandardManager needs to cope with sessions throwi|
| 5985|New|Enh|2002-01-23|Tomcat should perform a more restrictive validatio|
| 6600|Opn|Enh|2002-02-20|enodeURL adds 'jsession' when 'isRequestedSessionI|
| 6614|New|Enh|2002-02-21|Have Bootstrap and StandardClassLoader use the sam|
| 6671|New|Enh|2002-02-25|Simple custom tag example uses old declaration sty|
| 7043|New|Enh|2002-03-12|database user and password for JDBC Based Store   |
| 7374|New|Enh|2002-03-22|Apache Tomcat/4.0.1 message on standard output|
| 7676|New|Enh|2002-04-02|Allow name property to use match experssions in  without className in server.xml produces N|
|11069|Opn|Enh|2002-07-23|Tomcat not flag error if tld is outside of /WEB-IN|
|11129|New|Enh|2002-07-24|New valve for putting the sessionIDs in the reques|
|11248|New|Enh|2002-07-29|DefaultServlet doesn't send expires header|
|11754|Opn|Enh|2002-08-15|Synchronous shutdown script - shutdown.sh should w|
|12069|New|Enh|2002-08-27|Creation of more HttpSession objects for one previ|
|12428|Opn|Maj|2002-09-09|request.getUserPrincipal(): Misinterpretation of s|
|12658|New|Enh|2002-09-15|a proxy host and port at the  element level |
|12766|New|Enh|2002-09-18|Tomcat should use tld files in /WEB-INF/ over vers|
|13040|New|Nor|2002-09-26|can't retrieve external context who's uri is a sub|
|13309|Opn|Enh|2002-10-04|Catalina calls System.exit()  |
|13634|New|Enh|2002-10-15|Allowing system properties to be substituted in co|
|13689|Opn|Enh|2002-10-16|Classloader paths for 'Common' classes and librari|
|13731|New|Enh|2002-10-17|Final request, response, session and other variabl|
|13846|New|Nor|2002-10-22|If-Modified-Since results in incorrect headers|
|13941|New|Enh|2002-10-24|reload is VERY slow   |
|13965|New|Enh|2002-10-25|Catalina.sh correction request for Tru64 Unix |
|13983|New|Nor|2002-10-25|RMI call from Web Application throws SocketExcepti|
|14097|New|Enh|2002-10-30|hardcoded registry value for vm lets tomcat servic|
|14416|New|Enh|2002-11-10|blank tag name in TLD cause NullPointerException  |
|14635|New|Enh|2002-11-18|Should be possible not to have -MM-DD in log f|
|14766|New|Enh|2002-11-22|Redirect Vavle|
|14993|New|Enh|2002-12-02|Possible obselete synchronized declaration|
|15115|New|Enh|2002-12-05|correct docs... XML parser *cannot* be overridden |
|15417|Opn|Enh|2002-12-16|Add port for forced compilation of JSP pages  |
|15570|New|Nor|2002-12-20|incorrect role-name mapping for "*" with respect t|
|15688|New|Enh|2002-12-27|full-qualified names instead of imports   |
|15893|New|Enh|2003-01-08|Need a getPort() method on Connector or similar fu|
|15941|New|Enh|2003-01-10|Expose rootCause exceptions at deeper levels  |
|15946|New|Nor|2003-01-10|Documentation change  |
|16185|New|Nor|2003-01-16|UserDatabase is not bound in this context |
|16205|New|Maj|2003-01-17|org.apache.naming.factory.BeanFactory bugs|
|16294|New|Enh|2003-01-21|Configurable URL Decoding.|
|16357|New|Enh|2003-01-23|"connection timeout reached"  |
|16531|New|Enh|2003-01-29|Updating already deployed ".war" files in a single|
|16579|New|Enh|2003-01-30|documentation page layout/style breaks wrapping to|
|16596|New|Enh|2003-01-30|option for disabling log rotation |
|17070|New|Enh|2003-02-14|The Catalina Ant tasks do not allow for 'reusable'|
|17146|New|Enh|2003-02-18|Simplify build.xml using  whose target performs a 'forward' do|
|21669|New|Enh|2003-07-16|JNDIRealm ro

Bug report for Tomcat 3 [2005/08/21]

[bugzilla]

+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID   |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned|
| | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved)   |
| |   +-+
| |   | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major |
| |   |   MIN=Minor   NOR=Normal  ENH=Enhancement   |
| |   |   +-+
| |   |   | Date Posted |
| |   |   |  +--+
| |   |   |  | Description  |
| |   |   |  |  |
| 2350|Ver|Nor|2001-06-27|ServletConfig.getInitParameter() requires url-patt|
| 2478|Opn|Cri|2001-07-06|Passing Session variables between JSP's and Servle|
| 4551|Opn|Nor|2001-10-31|Ctx( /tt01 ): IOException in: R( /tt01 + /com/abc/|
| 4980|New|Min|2001-11-20|Startup message indicates incorrect log file  |
| 4994|New|Nor|2001-11-21|Tomcat needs a mechanism for clean and certain shu|
| 5064|New|Cri|2001-11-25|Socket write error when include files is more than|
| 5108|New|Maj|2001-11-26|Docs for Tomcat 3.2.x appear to be for Tomcat 3.3 |
| 5137|New|Nor|2001-11-27|Null pointer in class loader after attempting to r|
| 5160|Unc|Maj|2001-11-28|'IllegalStateException'   |
| 5331|New|Nor|2001-12-09|getPathInfo vs URL normalization  |
| 5510|New|Blk|2001-12-19|How to call ejb deployed in JBoss from Tomcat serv|
| 5756|New|Nor|2002-01-08|jspc.bat exits with wrong ERRORLEVEL  |
| 5797|New|Nor|2002-01-10|UnCatched ? StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Strin|
| 6027|New|Maj|2002-01-25|Tomcat  Automatically shuts down as service   |
| 6168|New|Blk|2002-02-01|IllegalStateException |
| 6451|New|Cri|2002-02-14|Stackoverflow |
| 6478|New|Enh|2002-02-14|Default Tomcat Encoding   |
| 6488|Ver|Maj|2002-02-15|Error: 304. Apparent bug in default ErrorHandler c|
| 6648|New|Nor|2002-02-25|jakarta-servletapi build with java 1.4 javadoc err|
| 6702|New|Cri|2002-02-27|win 2k services not working   |
| 6796|New|Cri|2002-03-01|Tomcat dies periodically  |
| 6989|New|Maj|2002-03-08|Unable to read tld file during parallel JSP compil|
| 7013|New|Cri|2002-03-10|Entering a servlet path with non-ISO8859-1 charact|
| 7227|New|Nor|2002-03-19| directive don't work |
| 7626|New|Nor|2002-03-29|classloader not working properly  |
| 7652|New|Cri|2002-04-01|Tomcat stalls periodically|
| 7785|New|Blk|2002-04-06|tomcat bug in context reloading   |
| 7863|New|Maj|2002-04-09|I have a problem when running Tomcat with IIS |
| 8187|New|Cri|2002-04-17|Errors when Tomcat used with MS Access database   |
| 8239|New|Cri|2002-04-18|Resource temporary unavailable|
| 8263|New|Cri|2002-04-18|url-pattern easy to circumvent|
| 9250|New|Maj|2002-05-20|outOfMemoryError  |
| 9367|New|Maj|2002-05-23|HttpSessionBindingEvent not thrown for HttpSession|
| 9390|New|Nor|2002-05-24|jasper compilation error in tomcat|
| 9480|New|Nor|2002-05-29|Data connection pooling   |
| 9607|New|Maj|2002-06-04|precompile JSP|
| 9737|Ver|Nor|2002-06-10|ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when sending just p|
|10047|New|Cri|2002-06-20|IllegalStateException |
|10202|New|Maj|2002-06-25|Tomcat is not responding in time  |
|10357|Unc|Blk|2002-06-30|java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Short Read|
|10406|New|Cri|2002-07-02|IllegalStateException |
|11087|New|Blk|2002-07-23|IllegalStateException |
|11286|New|Maj|2002-07-30|Tomcat threads not respond if increase JVM size   |
|11466|New|Nor|2002-08-05|ContextManager: SocketException reading request   |
|12156|New|Cri|2002-08-29|Apache and Tomcat 3.3.1 Interworking problem  |
|12194|New|Maj|2002-08-30|Tomcat does not send WWW-Authenticate header  |
|12852|New|Nor|2002-09-20|May be error in _jspService() -> out.flushBuffers(|
|14386|New|Maj|2002-11-08|Date headers corrupted using setDateHeader|
|15632|New|Nor|2002-12-23|Problem with the Tomcat Sessions Parameter on URL |
|16363|New|Cri|2003-01-23|Stack Overflow accessing compiled JSP - Tomcat 3.2|
|17081|New|Min|2003-02-14|Some javadoc comment fixes|
|17915|New|Maj|2003

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36293] - Ability to free idle ClassLoader resources

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36293





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-21 22:28 ---
Look Remy, I'm not trying to fight with you but what I'm saying is this...

resourceEntries is only referenced by WebappClassLoader.java (I scanned the
entire source-code tree) and within that file, entries are added but never
removed. It does not respect the configuration settings outlined here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/context.html

Specifically, cacheMaxSize, cacheTTL.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36293] - Ability to free idle ClassLoader resources

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36293





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-21 22:22 ---
Remm, this isn't a problem with my webapp. This is a problem with Tomcat.

WebappClassLoader disregards the context cache settings. That is the problem. I
can't even configure its behavior.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36293] - Ability to free idle ClassLoader resources

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36293


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-21 22:12 ---
How about filing sensible bug reports rather than continuously waste people's
time with non existent corner cases ? Obviously there are one million ways to
write broken webapps.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36293] New: - Ability to free idle ClassLoader resources

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36293

   Summary: Ability to free idle ClassLoader resources
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: 5.5.9
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P2
 Component: Catalina
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


If you look inside WebappClassLoader, once a resource is loaded and a
ResourceEntry is allocated for it it is never freed. Now say a user references a
large image on my webapp once 10 hours ago, I'm stuck with that memory loss
indefinately. My website is very image oriented (a lot of large images) and it
is quite painful to keep those unused images around forever. I keep on running
into OutOfMemoryErrors.

We should be able to configure reasonable idle settings. For example, I'd like
for image resources to be freed if they've been idle for over 30 minutes.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: inprocess Tomcat/apache via mod_jk

[Costin Manolache]

With worker - it may work. However you may find mod_jk inprocess to be 
slower than ajp and mod_proxy ( or comparable in speed ), this is due to 
 the way parameters are passed as strings ( i.e. lots of unoptimized 
char-byte conversion ).


Porting to 5.5.x shouldn't be hard - the interface between tomcat and 
modjk is very simple: you need to startup, i.e. make sure classpath is 
set and the class that executes launches tomcat correctly, and then it's 
a simple class that does the request/response passing.


If you do this for performance reasons - you may want to look at the 
code in jk2, and try to backport it. A benefit would be that the 
interface is even simpler - the req/response are passed in the same kind 
of buffer as ajp requests. AFAIK that's the only major difference. Since 
Remy, Mladen, etc have greatly optimized the regular tcp connectors - 
probably the difference on performance ( with this optimization 
backported ) will be small. But if you use the old style of interface - 
I'm sure jni will be slower (it was slower 2 years ago).


Costin


Christine Ho wrote:

Hi,
   Thanks a lot. I am really appreciated for your
reply. How about the worker MPM? My team is running
the httpd.worker on RHEL4. The current setting is:

StartServers 1
ServerLimit 1

MaxClients 64
MinSpareThreads 32
MaxSpareThreads 64
ThreadsPerChild 64 


Does the inprocess Tomcat 5.5.9 work for the worker
MPM?

thanks,
Christine

--- Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Well, inprocess doesn't really work for any MPM on
*nix systems (e.g. with
the prefork MPM, you end up with MaxChild copies of
Tomcat running :).  As a
result, there just hasn't been that much interest in
implementing (or even
back-porting) a feature that only works on Windows
and NetWare.


- Original Message -
From: "Christine Ho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 3:30 PM
Subject: inprocess Tomcat/apache via mod_jk


Hi,
  I have posted this email a month ago. I just
wonder
if any developer on mod_jk can answer my question. I
would like to have inprocess Tomcat 5.5.9 running in
Apache 2.x if possible.

thanks again,
Christine


Hi,
  I tried to setup Tomcat 5.5.9 running inside the
apache server 2.x via the mod_jk on RHEL4. I got the
following error:
[debug] open_jvm2::jk_jni_worker.c (1055): JVM
created
[emerg] get_bridge_object::jk_jni_worker.c (1097):
Can't find class
org/apache/tomcat/modules/server/JNIEndpoint

I looked at the mod_jk source codes and found out
that
the mod_jk supports the TC32_BRIDGE_TYPE and
TC33_BRIDGE_TYPE. It doesnt support bridge type of
tomcat 4.x and up. Plus the tomcat 5.5.9 doesnt have
the JNIEndpoint.class.

However, it seems to me that the deprecated mod_jk2
supports bridge type of tomcat 4.x and up because it
tries to instantiate the class
org/apache/jk/apr/TomcatStarter.class which exists
in
tomcat-ajp.jar.

I really dont understand why the mod_jk supports
tomcat 3.x only whereas the deprecated mod_jk2
supports tomcat 4.x and 5.x. Can somebody please
tell
me why?

Also is it easy to have mod_jk to support
TC55_BRIDGE_TYPE? Based on the mod_jk source codes
jk_jni_worker.c, I think I just need to define the
TC55_JAVA_BRIDGE_CLASS_NAME to be
org/apache/jk/apr/TomcatStarter.class and then
assign
it to the btype. Is it just that simple?

Another question is what the disadvantages of
running
tomcat inside the apache are. I googled and it seems
to me that not too many people try to run inprocess
tomcat inside apache. I would be interested in
adding
the 5.5 bridge type to the mod_jk.

thanks,
Christine


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com




-


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





This message is intended only for the use of the
person(s) listed above as the intended recipient(s),
and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and
CONFIDENTIAL.  If you are not an intended recipient,
you may not read, copy, or distribute this message
or any attachment. If you received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately
by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message
and any attachments.

In addition you should be aware that ordinary
(unencrypted) e-mail sent through the Internet is
not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive
information, such as social security numbers,
account numbers, personal identification numbers and
passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail.





-


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]









Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36291] - Make Are you sure? dialog optional

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36291


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-21 18:27 ---
I don't see the point of adding yet more useless complexity. If you're annoyed,
consider using the Ant tasks, or hacking the code a little.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36291] New: - Make Are you sure? dialog optional

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36291

   Summary: Make Are you sure? dialog optional
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: 5.5.9
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P2
 Component: Webapps:Manager
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Since 5.5 there is an Are you sure? dialog on all HTML Manager actions (as a
result of Bug 29485 ?)
I understand the reasons of Bug 29485, but especially on my development machine
I do find the confirm dialog very annoying. So, what about a compromise and have
an entry in manager web.xml to make the confirm dialog configurable, which could
even be on by default?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33650] - Jasper performance for multiple files processing

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33650





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-21 17:27 ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> Created an attachment (id=16128)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16128&action=view) 
[edit]
> cpu profiling snapshot by class (call tree) after the change
> After the patch, the TagLibraryInfoImpl would take much less CPU time, less
> than 5%.
> As it's inconvenient to post the profiling snapshots here (one at a time), I
> would post the rest of them on my personal website to show the differences.
> I'll post the URL when it's done.

The URL is http://www.cs.ucf.edu/~xbgao/jasper/jasper-33650.htm. It contains 
12 screenshots in total.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36289] - Windows installer missing catalina.bat

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36289


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-21 11:02 ---
That's as designed. If you want them, download the zip.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]