Re:[VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

2002-02-22 Thread Jonathan Pierce


Since 4.0.2 is already released, shouldn't this be tagged 4.0.3b2 ?

Reply Separator
Subject:[VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
Author: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   1/16/2002 3:10 PM

Hi,

I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with
the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:

ballot
[ ] +1 Make the release
[ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
[ ] -0 Bad idea
[ ] -1 No, because:



/ballot

The release process will be the following:
- Tag j-t-c/webapp with tomcat_402_b2
- Update the Java sources for webapp in the main Tomcat tree to mirror the
changes; I plan to remove the duplication for the next release, and handle
webapp the same way as JK (or Coyote)
- Tag j-t-c/jk with tomcat_402_b2 (it's fine to also tag it with something
else, I just think it's a better way to mark which version went in)
- Tag j-t-c/util with tomcat_402_b2
- Generate binaries for the Java code from the j-t-c components, and update
the binaries in the main Tomcat tree
- Tag the Tomcat tree with tomcat_402_b2
- Build and upload the main Tomcat binaries
- Build and upload the native binaries for JK and webapp
- Build and upload the RPMs

Note: IMO JK should be considered release quality in this release, and
should be enabled by default; of course, the final word on this goes to the
JK developers :)

Thanks,
Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



This email and any files transmitted with it are for the named person's use
only.  It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged
information.  No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mistransmission.  If you receive this message in error, please immediately
delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies
of it and notify the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use,
disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you
are not the intended recipient.

This email message has been swept by a virus software product for the
presence of computer viruses.
*

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re[2]:[VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

2002-02-22 Thread Jonathan Pierce


Please ignore my last message, my mailer delivered the last email late to me so
I thought you were planning another release. 
Sorry

Reply Separator
Subject:Re:[VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
Author: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   2/22/2002 4:12 PM


Since 4.0.2 is already released, shouldn't this be tagged 4.0.3b2 ?

Reply Separator
Subject:[VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
Author: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   1/16/2002 3:10 PM

Hi,

I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with
the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:

ballot
[ ] +1 Make the release
[ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
[ ] -0 Bad idea
[ ] -1 No, because:



/ballot

The release process will be the following:
- Tag j-t-c/webapp with tomcat_402_b2
- Update the Java sources for webapp in the main Tomcat tree to mirror the
changes; I plan to remove the duplication for the next release, and handle
webapp the same way as JK (or Coyote)
- Tag j-t-c/jk with tomcat_402_b2 (it's fine to also tag it with something
else, I just think it's a better way to mark which version went in)
- Tag j-t-c/util with tomcat_402_b2
- Generate binaries for the Java code from the j-t-c components, and update
the binaries in the main Tomcat tree
- Tag the Tomcat tree with tomcat_402_b2
- Build and upload the main Tomcat binaries
- Build and upload the native binaries for JK and webapp
- Build and upload the RPMs

Note: IMO JK should be considered release quality in this release, and
should be enabled by default; of course, the final word on this goes to the
JK developers :)

Thanks,
Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



This email and any files transmitted with it are for the named person's use
only.  It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged
information.  No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mistransmission.  If you receive this message in error, please immediately
delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies
of it and notify the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use,
disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you
are not the intended recipient.

This email message has been swept by a virus software product for the
presence of computer viruses.
*

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



This email and any files transmitted with it are for the named person's use
only.  It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged
information.  No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mistransmission.  If you receive this message in error, please immediately
delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies
of it and notify the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use,
disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you
are not the intended recipient.

This email message has been swept by a virus software product for the
presence of computer viruses.
*

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

2002-01-18 Thread Bip Thelin

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:

 [...]
 ballot
 [ ] +1 Make the release
 [X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
 [ ] -0 Bad idea
 [ ] -1 No, because:
 /ballot



-bip



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

2002-01-17 Thread jean-frederic clere

Remy Maucherat wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with
 the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:
 
 ballot
 [X] +1 Make the release
 [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
 [ ] -0 Bad idea
 [ ] -1 No, because:
 
 /ballot
 
 The release process will be the following:
 - Tag j-t-c/webapp with tomcat_402_b2
 - Update the Java sources for webapp in the main Tomcat tree to mirror the
 changes; I plan to remove the duplication for the next release, and handle
 webapp the same way as JK (or Coyote)

Why not doing it now? - I have only fixed things in j-t-c - 
I will port back the _change_ in TC to j-t-c.

 - Tag j-t-c/jk with tomcat_402_b2 (it's fine to also tag it with something
 else, I just think it's a better way to mark which version went in)
 - Tag j-t-c/util with tomcat_402_b2
 - Generate binaries for the Java code from the j-t-c components, and update
 the binaries in the main Tomcat tree
 - Tag the Tomcat tree with tomcat_402_b2
 - Build and upload the main Tomcat binaries
 - Build and upload the native binaries for JK and webapp
 - Build and upload the RPMs
 
 Note: IMO JK should be considered release quality in this release, and
 should be enabled by default; of course, the final word on this goes to the
 JK developers :)
 
 Thanks,
 Remy
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

2002-01-17 Thread Bojan Smojver

Remy Maucherat wrote:


 I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with
 the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:
 
 ballot
 [ ] +1 Make the release
 [X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
 [ ] -0 Bad idea
 [ ] -1 No, because:

  /ballot

Bojan


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

2002-01-17 Thread GOMEZ Henri

I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of 
the week (with
the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:

ballot
[ ] +1 Make the release
[ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
[ ] -0 Bad idea
[ ] -1 No, because:



/ballot


+1 since you'll add the load-balancing stuff.

PS: Since I'll have to works on RPM, could you send us early
annoucement of source tarball availability to make me sure
that everything works fine to avoid the problem I got with
TC 4.0.1 with incorrect gif and empty htmls

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

2002-01-17 Thread Faraj Meir

+1
- Original Message -
From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:02 PM
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release


 I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of
 the week (with
 the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:
 
 ballot
 [ ] +1 Make the release
 [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
 [ ] -0 Bad idea
 [ ] -1 No, because:
 
 
 
 /ballot
 

 +1 since you'll add the load-balancing stuff.

 PS: Since I'll have to works on RPM, could you send us early
 annoucement of source tarball availability to make me sure
 that everything works fine to avoid the problem I got with
 TC 4.0.1 with incorrect gif and empty htmls

 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

2002-01-17 Thread Larry Isaacs


 ballot
 [ ] +1 Make the release
 [X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
 [ ] -0 Bad idea
 [ ] -1 No, because:
 /ballot

Larry

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

2002-01-17 Thread Remy Maucherat

 On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:

   +1 if the load balancing code gets in.
   -0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will
   not work in 4.0.2 ).
 
  I plan to port the jvmRoute patch. Is it enough ?

 Yes, you have my +1 than. ( it should be a trivial thing, I just want to
 make sure it gets in before the release )

Done.

There are dependencies of the new Java JK components for Tomcat 4 with some
Tomcat 3 components which are not yet in tomcat-util, like util.net and the
PoolTcpConnector. It's fine to use them, but they should be in j-t-c/util.
The build process shouldn't reference the utils which are from the TC 3 tree
anymore.

In the meantime, I removed the new stuff from the build to avoid possible
problems.

Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

2002-01-17 Thread Bill Barker

 ballot
 [ ] +1 Make the release
 [X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
 [ ] -0 Bad idea
 [ ] -1 No, because:
 
 
 
 /ballot



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

2002-01-16 Thread Craig R. McClanahan



On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:


 ballot
 [X] +1 Make the release
 [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
 [ ] -0 Bad idea
 [ ] -1 No, because:
 /ballot


Craig


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

2002-01-16 Thread Andy Armstrong

Remy Maucherat wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with
 the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:
 
 ballot
 [X] +1 Make the release
 [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
 [ ] -0 Bad idea
 [ ] -1 No, because:
 
 /ballot
 
 The release process will be the following:
 - Tag j-t-c/webapp with tomcat_402_b2
 - Update the Java sources for webapp in the main Tomcat tree to mirror the
 changes; I plan to remove the duplication for the next release, and handle
 webapp the same way as JK (or Coyote)
 - Tag j-t-c/jk with tomcat_402_b2 (it's fine to also tag it with something
 else, I just think it's a better way to mark which version went in)
 - Tag j-t-c/util with tomcat_402_b2
 - Generate binaries for the Java code from the j-t-c components, and update
 the binaries in the main Tomcat tree
 - Tag the Tomcat tree with tomcat_402_b2
 - Build and upload the main Tomcat binaries
 - Build and upload the native binaries for JK and webapp
 - Build and upload the RPMs
 
 Note: IMO JK should be considered release quality in this release, and
 should be enabled by default; of course, the final word on this goes to the
 JK developers :)
 
 Thanks,
 Remy
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Andy Armstrong, Tagish

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

2002-01-16 Thread Kevin Seguin

 
 ballot
 [X] +1 Make the release
 [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
 [ ] -0 Bad idea
 [ ] -1 No, because:
 
 
 
 /ballot
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

2002-01-16 Thread Cavan Morris

Is there a plan to build native webapp for Apache 2.0 as well as 1.3?

 
 ballot
 [ ] +1 Make the release
 [X ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
 [ ] -0 Bad idea
 [ ] -1 No, because:
 
 
 
 /ballot



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

2002-01-16 Thread Amy Roh


 [X] +1 Make the release
 [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
 [ ] -0 Bad idea
 [ ] -1 No, because:

Amy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

2002-01-16 Thread costinm

+1 if the load balancing code gets in.
-0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will
not work in 4.0.2 ).

Costin


 The release process will be the following:
 - Tag j-t-c/webapp with tomcat_402_b2
 - Update the Java sources for webapp in the main Tomcat tree to mirror the
 changes; I plan to remove the duplication for the next release, and handle
 webapp the same way as JK (or Coyote)
 - Tag j-t-c/jk with tomcat_402_b2 (it's fine to also tag it with something
 else, I just think it's a better way to mark which version went in)
 - Tag j-t-c/util with tomcat_402_b2
 - Generate binaries for the Java code from the j-t-c components, and update
 the binaries in the main Tomcat tree
 - Tag the Tomcat tree with tomcat_402_b2
 - Build and upload the main Tomcat binaries
 - Build and upload the native binaries for JK and webapp
 - Build and upload the RPMs

 Note: IMO JK should be considered release quality in this release, and
 should be enabled by default; of course, the final word on this goes to the
 JK developers :)

 Thanks,
 Remy


 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

2002-01-16 Thread Remy Maucherat

 +1 if the load balancing code gets in.
 -0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will
 not work in 4.0.2 ).

I plan to port the jvmRoute patch. Is it enough ?

Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

2002-01-16 Thread costinm

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:

  +1 if the load balancing code gets in.
  -0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will
  not work in 4.0.2 ).

 I plan to port the jvmRoute patch. Is it enough ?

Yes, you have my +1 than. ( it should be a trivial thing, I just want to
make sure it gets in before the release )

Thanks,
Costin


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]