DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36204] New: - Webapp unable to pick the Class by the shared classloader
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36204. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36204 Summary: Webapp unable to pick the Class by the shared classloader Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.0.16 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P1 Component: Catalina AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] When tomcat is embedded in the application (run programmatically by Bootstrap init and start). The web application is unable to find the class inside a jar in the folder shared/lib. e.g. activation.jar is placed inside the shared/lib but still the webapp says that NoClassDefFoundError -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36173] - AssertionFailure in java.util.GregorianCalendar.computeFields() when sending response
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36173. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36173 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-16 18:53 --- This sounds reasonable. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33106. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33106 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-16 19:38 --- Created an attachment (id=16065) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16065action=view) catch exceptions for non-file based urls While testing with the official code merges, I noticed that some exception catching was removed from two file based methods. If these exceptions are not caught, non-file based includes won't work. In my case, we do a !--#include virtual=/some/servlet-- but because that's not a file, it can't figure out the last modified date because the servlet doesn't set one, and so it throws an exception. This exception needs to be caught, or the include won't work. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33106. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33106 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26372] - java.lang.ThreadDeath when trying to reload an application
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26372. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26372 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-16 19:57 --- Sorry, the FAQ points to this issue but it still isn't clear to me how to fix it. Tomcat/bin contains commons-logging-api.jar Each webapp ships with its own log4j*.jar files so what should I be changing in my configuration to prevent a ThreadDeath? Please clarify. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36102] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker actions do not persist
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-17 01:26 --- No solution but a remark: The observation, that you don't see the problem when reloading/refreshing the page might come from the fact, that he chang i done via GET request, so refreshing the page again sends the request including all parameters, so the change is applied a second time. I don't know much about IIS, but maybe you can limit the number of threads to some low count (e.g. 5 or 10) and then check the status of the stopped worker not only once or twice but 10 to 20 times and check, if it is non-stopped all the time, or sporadically stopped. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36169] - [PATCH] Enable chunked encoding for IIS JK connector
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36169. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36169 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-15 17:58 --- (In reply to comment #2) Have you verified this works? I've verified it on IIS 5.0 on Win2K and IIS 5.1 on WinXPPro, at least during our modest testing. I tried only to make changes to the IIS-specific code, but obviously made one change to jk_ajp_common.c. It's probably possible to rollback the change to jk_ajp_common.c and add code to the IIS-specific pieces so that the if-statement in jk_ajp_common.c is still tripped accordingly. In the case of IIS, most of the work of dealing with HTTP is left up to the ISAPI filters; IIS does very little for you. Anyway, my familiarity with the connector code involves the few hours I spent getting chunked encoding to work properly with IIS. I've tried to be a good citizen and report the problem with a potential patch. If there is a better way to handle this, I certainly have no ego associated with my patch. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31125] - conf/web.xml not valid
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31125. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31125 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-15 18:54 --- I am having the same problem when doing ant's xmlvalidate with this web.xml. [xmlvalidate] /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/curr/conf/web.xml:5:19: Document root element web-app, must match DOCTYPE root null. [xmlvalidate] /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/curr/conf/web.xml:5:19: Document is invalid: no grammar found. BUILD FAILED build.xml:2620: /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/curr/conf/web.xml is not a valid XML document. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31125] - conf/web.xml not valid
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31125.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31125
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-15 19:06 ---
oops, first tried to validate against a DTD Web Application 2.3
but when corrected with
xmlvalidate file=${tomcat_home_temp}/conf/web.xml failonerror=yes
warn=true
attribute
name=http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/schema;
value=true /
attribute
name=http://xml.org/sax/features/namespaces; value=true /
/xmlvalidate
I get
[xmlvalidate] /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/curr/conf/web.xml:596:54:
cvc-pattern-valid: Value 'application/mathml+xml' is not facet-valid with
respect to pattern '[\p{L}\-\p{Nd}]+/[\p{L}\-\p{Nd}\.]+' for type 'null'.
[xmlvalidate] /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/curr/conf/web.xml:596:54:
cvc-complex-type.2.2: Element 'mime-type' must have no element [children], and
the value must be valid.
[xmlvalidate] /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/curr/conf/web.xml:748:51:
cvc-pattern-valid: Value 'application/rdf+xml' is not facet-valid with respect
to pattern '[\p{L}\-\p{Nd}]+/[\p{L}\-\p{Nd}\.]+' for type 'null'.
[xmlvalidate] /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/curr/conf/web.xml:748:51:
cvc-complex-type.2.2: Element 'mime-type' must have no element [children], and
the value must be valid.
[xmlvalidate] /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/curr/conf/web.xml:804:45:
cvc-pattern-valid: Value 'image/svg+xml' is not facet-valid with respect to
pattern '[\p{L}\-\p{Nd}]+/[\p{L}\-\p{Nd}\.]+' for type 'null'.
[xmlvalidate] /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/curr/conf/web.xml:804:45:
cvc-complex-type.2.2: Element 'mime-type' must have no element [children], and
the value must be valid.
[xmlvalidate] /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/curr/conf/web.xml:864:56:
cvc-pattern-valid: Value 'application/voicexml+xml' is not facet-valid with
respect to pattern '[\p{L}\-\p{Nd}]+/[\p{L}\-\p{Nd}\.]+' for type 'null'.
[xmlvalidate] /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/curr/conf/web.xml:864:56:
cvc-complex-type.2.2: Element 'mime-type' must have no element [children], and
the value must be valid.
[xmlvalidate] /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/curr/conf/web.xml:872:53:
cvc-pattern-valid: Value 'application/xhtml+xml' is not facet-valid with respect
to pattern '[\p{L}\-\p{Nd}]+/[\p{L}\-\p{Nd}\.]+' for type 'null'.
[xmlvalidate] /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/curr/conf/web.xml:872:53:
cvc-complex-type.2.2: Element 'mime-type' must have no element [children], and
the value must be valid.
[xmlvalidate] /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/curr/conf/web.xml:876:53:
cvc-pattern-valid: Value 'application/xhtml+xml' is not facet-valid with respect
to pattern '[\p{L}\-\p{Nd}]+/[\p{L}\-\p{Nd}\.]+' for type 'null'.
[xmlvalidate] /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/curr/conf/web.xml:876:53:
cvc-complex-type.2.2: Element 'mime-type' must have no element [children], and
the value must be valid.
[xmlvalidate] /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/curr/conf/web.xml:892:52:
cvc-pattern-valid: Value 'application/xslt+xml' is not facet-valid with respect
to pattern '[\p{L}\-\p{Nd}]+/[\p{L}\-\p{Nd}\.]+' for type 'null'.
[xmlvalidate] /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/curr/conf/web.xml:892:52:
cvc-complex-type.2.2: Element 'mime-type' must have no element [children], and
the value must be valid.
[xmlvalidate] /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/curr/conf/web.xml:896:63:
cvc-pattern-valid: Value 'application/vnd.mozilla.xul+xml' is not facet-valid
with respect to pattern '[\p{L}\-\p{Nd}]+/[\p{L}\-\p{Nd}\.]+' for type 'null'.
[xmlvalidate] /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/curr/conf/web.xml:896:63:
cvc-complex-type.2.2: Element 'mime-type' must have no element [children], and
the value must be valid.
BUILD FAILED
/www/bugzilla/pl_sources/privaLope/build.xml:2618:
/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/curr/conf/web.xml is not a valid XML document.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36198] New: - Class loading/compilation error
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36198. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36198 Summary: Class loading/compilation error Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: PC URL: http://136.142.92.26:8080/gnm/mode_shapes.jsp OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Servlet JSP API AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have encountered an odd error I have been unable to solve. I have reviewed all the Tomcat documentation and searched Bugzilla for a solution but nothing has worked so far. In summary I have created a set of JSPs and Java classes that are used to visualize pre-generated biological data for a research project. These JSPs interact with the Java classes to perform some file IO and other activities. The problem I have encountered is as follows: the JSPs spit out java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError errors when accessed, so I've concluded they cannot 'see' the Java classes I have created for them to use. I have gone through a number of troubleshooting solutions including: Placing the classes in the 'WEB-INF/classes' directory of the web application root where the JSPs are stored, copying the classes to the working dorectory where the JSPs are compiled (both en masse and with the full package structure), and I have tried specifying the CLASSPATH used to compile the JSPs with the web.xml file in the 'WEB-INF' directory of the web application root. None of these have solved the problem. The exact error I'm getting is as follows: javax.servlet.ServletException: Replacer org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.doHandlePageException (PageContextImpl.java:848) org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.handlePageException (PageContextImpl.java:781) org.apache.jsp.mode_005fshape_005fvisual_jsp._jspService (org.apache.jsp.mode_005fshape_005fvisual_jsp:235) org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:97) javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802) org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service (JspServletWrapper.java:322) org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:291) org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:241) javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802) root cause java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Replacer Mode_Shape_Session.init(Mode_Shape_Session.java:183) org.apache.jsp.mode_005fshape_005fvisual_jsp._jspService (org.apache.jsp.mode_005fshape_005fvisual_jsp:143) org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:97) javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802) org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service (JspServletWrapper.java:322) org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:291) org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:241) javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802) To generate the problem go to the URL listed with this bug report and click on the Go iGNM button. How do I configure Tomcat to look for my Java classes when compiling JSPs? Or where do I place the compiled classes so the JSP compiler can see them when the JSPs are compiled? This project will result in a article publication in a major scientific journal, and any help you can offer would surely be noted in said article. Thanks, Mark Holliman -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36198] - Class loading/compilation error
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36198. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36198 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-15 23:17 --- Are your classes in a package? Did you review of the documentation include http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/classnotfound.html ? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36199] New: - java plugin
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36199. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36199 Summary: java plugin Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Unknown AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN\ HTMLHEADTITLEJApplet/TITLE/HEAD BODY jsp:plugin type=applet code=ASV_applet.class codebase = /ASV_site width=700 height=600 /jsp:plugin /BODY/HTML This JSP generates a page that asks my Firefox106 and Netscape8 to load a plugin, I suppose the Java one. But when promted to do so, these two browsers say that no such plugin exists and the applet is not loaded. Both browsers are Java enabled (1.5.0), that I tested on different sites. When I launch my applet by applet ., all works fine. The EMBEDED part (for IE) of the generated page works fine. Any idea ? Regards Cyril Mrazek -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30697] - Conformance of clustering to the spec
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30697. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30697 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-14 11:45 --- I don't thing that a cluster implementation sync multiple requests at different nodes. It is a perfomance killer and we not implement this. You must have a single opening request to create the session. With sticky session mode at your loadbalancer all your frame request goes than to same node. Cluster works only for node failures. Then your lb can navigate to the correct backup session state. Frame based systems are very complicate story for correct failure handling inside a cluster. :-( Peter -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug report for Tomcat 3 [2005/08/14]
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned| | | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved) | | | +-+ | | | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major | | | | MIN=Minor NOR=Normal ENH=Enhancement | | | | +-+ | | | | Date Posted | | | | | +--+ | | | | | Description | | | | | | | | 2350|Ver|Nor|2001-06-27|ServletConfig.getInitParameter() requires url-patt| | 2478|Opn|Cri|2001-07-06|Passing Session variables between JSP's and Servle| | 4551|Opn|Nor|2001-10-31|Ctx( /tt01 ): IOException in: R( /tt01 + /com/abc/| | 4980|New|Min|2001-11-20|Startup message indicates incorrect log file | | 4994|New|Nor|2001-11-21|Tomcat needs a mechanism for clean and certain shu| | 5064|New|Cri|2001-11-25|Socket write error when include files is more than| | 5108|New|Maj|2001-11-26|Docs for Tomcat 3.2.x appear to be for Tomcat 3.3 | | 5137|New|Nor|2001-11-27|Null pointer in class loader after attempting to r| | 5160|Unc|Maj|2001-11-28|'IllegalStateException' | | 5331|New|Nor|2001-12-09|getPathInfo vs URL normalization | | 5510|New|Blk|2001-12-19|How to call ejb deployed in JBoss from Tomcat serv| | 5756|New|Nor|2002-01-08|jspc.bat exits with wrong ERRORLEVEL | | 5797|New|Nor|2002-01-10|UnCatched ? StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Strin| | 6027|New|Maj|2002-01-25|Tomcat Automatically shuts down as service | | 6168|New|Blk|2002-02-01|IllegalStateException | | 6451|New|Cri|2002-02-14|Stackoverflow | | 6478|New|Enh|2002-02-14|Default Tomcat Encoding | | 6488|Ver|Maj|2002-02-15|Error: 304. Apparent bug in default ErrorHandler c| | 6648|New|Nor|2002-02-25|jakarta-servletapi build with java 1.4 javadoc err| | 6702|New|Cri|2002-02-27|win 2k services not working | | 6796|New|Cri|2002-03-01|Tomcat dies periodically | | 6989|New|Maj|2002-03-08|Unable to read tld file during parallel JSP compil| | 7013|New|Cri|2002-03-10|Entering a servlet path with non-ISO8859-1 charact| | 7227|New|Nor|2002-03-19|error-code directive don't work | | 7626|New|Nor|2002-03-29|classloader not working properly | | 7652|New|Cri|2002-04-01|Tomcat stalls periodically| | 7785|New|Blk|2002-04-06|tomcat bug in context reloading | | 7863|New|Maj|2002-04-09|I have a problem when running Tomcat with IIS | | 8187|New|Cri|2002-04-17|Errors when Tomcat used with MS Access database | | 8239|New|Cri|2002-04-18|Resource temporary unavailable| | 8263|New|Cri|2002-04-18|url-pattern easy to circumvent| | 9250|New|Maj|2002-05-20|outOfMemoryError | | 9367|New|Maj|2002-05-23|HttpSessionBindingEvent not thrown for HttpSession| | 9390|New|Nor|2002-05-24|jasper compilation error in tomcat| | 9480|New|Nor|2002-05-29|Data connection pooling | | 9607|New|Maj|2002-06-04|precompile JSP| | 9737|Ver|Nor|2002-06-10|ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when sending just p| |10047|New|Cri|2002-06-20|IllegalStateException | |10202|New|Maj|2002-06-25|Tomcat is not responding in time | |10357|Unc|Blk|2002-06-30|java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Short Read| |10406|New|Cri|2002-07-02|IllegalStateException | |11087|New|Blk|2002-07-23|IllegalStateException | |11286|New|Maj|2002-07-30|Tomcat threads not respond if increase JVM size | |11466|New|Nor|2002-08-05|ContextManager: SocketException reading request | |12156|New|Cri|2002-08-29|Apache and Tomcat 3.3.1 Interworking problem | |12194|New|Maj|2002-08-30|Tomcat does not send WWW-Authenticate header | |12852|New|Nor|2002-09-20|May be error in _jspService() - out.flushBuffers(| |14386|New|Maj|2002-11-08|Date headers corrupted using setDateHeader| |15632|New|Nor|2002-12-23|Problem with the Tomcat Sessions Parameter on URL | |16363|New|Cri|2003-01-23|Stack Overflow accessing compiled JSP - Tomcat 3.2| |17081|New|Min|2003-02-14|Some javadoc comment fixes| |17915
Bug report for Tomcat 4 [2005/08/14]
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned| | | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved) | | | +-+ | | | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major | | | | MIN=Minor NOR=Normal ENH=Enhancement | | | | +-+ | | | | Date Posted | | | | | +--+ | | | | | Description | | | | | | | | 3839|Opn|Enh|2001-09-26|Problem bookmarking login page| | 4227|Opn|Enh|2001-10-17|Invalid CGI path | | 5329|New|Enh|2001-12-08|NT Service exits startup before Tomcat is finished| | 5795|New|Enh|2002-01-10|Catalina Shutdown relies on localhost causing prob| | 5829|New|Enh|2002-01-13|StandardManager needs to cope with sessions throwi| | 5985|New|Enh|2002-01-23|Tomcat should perform a more restrictive validatio| | 6600|Opn|Enh|2002-02-20|enodeURL adds 'jsession' when 'isRequestedSessionI| | 6614|New|Enh|2002-02-21|Have Bootstrap and StandardClassLoader use the sam| | 6671|New|Enh|2002-02-25|Simple custom tag example uses old declaration sty| | 7043|New|Enh|2002-03-12|database user and password for JDBC Based Store | | 7374|New|Enh|2002-03-22|Apache Tomcat/4.0.1 message on standard output| | 7676|New|Enh|2002-04-02|Allow name property to use match experssions in h| | 7723|New|Enh|2002-04-03|[patch] additional factory for org.apache.naming.f| | 7831|New|Nor|2002-04-08|[PATCH] JNDIRealm does not work with CLIENT-CERT a| | 7880|Ver|Cri|2002-04-09|If a TLV flags flags an error during the translati| | 8026|New|Enh|2002-04-12|Exceptions in StandardHostDeployer.addChild are lo| | 8275|Ver|Min|2002-04-18|ContextConfig.start() attempts to create a $CATALI| | 8323|New|Enh|2002-04-20|No support for running the 64 bit JVM | | 8343|New|Enh|2002-04-21|adding a absorber logger class to org.apache.ca| | 8441|New|Enh|2002-04-23|Command line files for NetWare| | 8705|New|Enh|2002-05-01|SessionListener should extend EventListener | | 8744|New|Enh|2002-05-02|No way to configure/extend runtime classloaders. | | 8776|New|Enh|2002-05-03|The session url encoding under somce circumstances| | 9027|New|Cri|2002-05-13|The Tomcat Servlet Container use the identity spec| | 9050|Ver|Nor|2002-05-13|GET Query Parameters Require an Equal Sign| | 9227|New|Enh|2002-05-19|Allow an empty value of a pathname in the Standard| | 9456|New|Enh|2002-05-28|Problem saving server.xml file: invalid XML markup| | 9511|New|Enh|2002-05-30|Object instantiation optimization in StandardSessi| | 9629|New|Enh|2002-06-05|Fix ServletContext.getResourcePaths to match spec | | 9745|New|Enh|2002-06-10|extern cache mgt bug for conditionally dynamic pag| | 9852|New|Enh|2002-06-13|Odd Digest and Realm Behaviour| |10021|New|Enh|2002-06-19|Include upgrade option in installer | |10026|Opn|Nor|2002-06-19|manager/stop and manager/remove | |10060|New|Enh|2002-06-20|Make the common and shared class loaders look in c| |10120|New|Enh|2002-06-21|Custom realm and shared instalation. | |10225|New|Enh|2002-06-25|ANT Tasks Error Situation | |10335|New|Enh|2002-06-28|[RFE,patch] Make JAASRealm more flexible | |10457|New|Enh|2002-07-03|Patch submission for DefaultServlet/WebdavServlet | |10526|New|Enh|2002-07-06|Authenticators do not always cache the Principal | |10541|New|Nor|2002-07-08|Content-length header should be automatically set | |10565|Opn|Enh|2002-07-08|shutdown hook problem: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundE| |10691|New|Enh|2002-07-11|staring tomcat gives indication that tomcat is sta| |10699|New|Enh|2002-07-11|Apache SOAP 2.3 will not operate properly | |10972|New|Enh|2002-07-19|Realm without className in server.xml produces N| |11069|Opn|Enh|2002-07-23|Tomcat not flag error if tld is outside of /WEB-IN| |11129|New|Enh|2002-07-24|New valve for putting the sessionIDs in the reques| |11248|New|Enh|2002-07-29|DefaultServlet doesn't send expires header| |11754|Opn|Enh|2002-08-15|Synchronous shutdown script - shutdown.sh should w| |12069|New|Enh|2002-08-27|Creation of more HttpSession objects for one previ| |12428|Opn|Maj|2002-09-09|request.getUserPrincipal(): Misinterpretation of s| |12658|New|Enh|2002-09-15|a proxy host and port at the Host element level | |12766|New|Enh
Bug report for Watchdog [2005/08/14]
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned| | | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved) | | | +-+ | | | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major | | | | MIN=Minor NOR=Normal ENH=Enhancement | | | | +-+ | | | | Date Posted | | | | | +--+ | | | | | Description | | | | | | | | 278|Unc|Nor|2000-12-04|Bug in GetParameterValuesTestServlet.java file Bug| | 279|Unc|Nor|2000-12-04|Logical Error in GetParameterValuesTestServlet Bug| | 469|Unc|Nor|2001-01-17|in example-taglib.tld urn should be uri BugRat| | 470|Unc|Nor|2001-01-17|FAIL positiveForward.jsp and positiveInclude.jsp B| | 9634|New|Enh|2002-06-05|No tests exist for ServletContext.getResourcePaths| |10703|New|Enh|2002-07-11|Need to test getRequestURI after RequestDispatcher| |11336|New|Enh|2002-07-31|Test wrapped path methods with RD.foward()| |11663|New|Maj|2002-08-13|JSP precompile tests rely on Jasper specific behav| |11664|New|Maj|2002-08-13|A sweep is needed of all Watchdog 4.0 tag librarie| |11665|New|Maj|2002-08-13|ServletToJSPErrorPageTest and ServletToServletErro| |11666|New|Maj|2002-08-13|SetBufferSize_1TestServlet is invalid.| |14004|New|Maj|2002-10-28|Incorrent behaviour of all attribute-related lifec| |15504|New|Nor|2002-12-18|JSP positiveGetValues test relies on order preserv| |24649|New|Nor|2003-11-12|getRemoteHost fails when agent has uppercase chara| |29398|New|Nor|2004-06-04|Update site and note current status | |35058|New|Nor|2005-05-25|test | |35353|Unc|Min|2005-06-14|test | |35354|New|Nor|2005-06-14|ts| |35395|New|Cri|2005-06-17|test | +-+---+---+--+--+ | Total 19 bugs | +---+ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36169] - [PATCH] Enable chunked encoding for IIS JK connector
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36169. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36169 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||com -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36169] - [PATCH] Enable chunked encoding for IIS JK connector
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36169. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36169 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-14 23:41 --- Have you verified this works? Looking at the Apache 2.0 code, it seems to delegate both the chunked encoding detection and the chunked encoded read to Apache via ap_* calls (and IIS isn't gonna be that accomodating). I can't see anywhere in the common read code that parses the chunk block length. This will have some overlap with #15357 , which implements chunked encoding on the outbound response. I'd also suggest the check for Transfer-Encoding: chunked be moved up a bit to where the Tomcat worker/query headers are checked for. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35297] - [PATCH] Chunked transfer encoding for IIS JK/ISAPI
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35297. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35297 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-14 23:42 --- I've improved this functionality a bit - mostly tweaking and adding some of the HTTP/1.1 edge cases for enabling chunked encoding. I won't repatch until JK 1.3 is branched, as there's no roadmap for that at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36179] New: - Error getting setter for Tag Attribute
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36179. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36179 Summary: Error getting setter for Tag Attribute Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: All OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Jasper AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi I'm creating a custom tag lib with a hAlign attribute. Jasper can't find the setHAlign method. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36179] - Error getting setter for Tag Attribute
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36179. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36179 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-14 07:09 --- Created an attachment (id=16038) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16038action=view) TLD File Example TLD File -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36179] - Error getting setter for Tag Attribute
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36179. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36179 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-14 07:10 --- Created an attachment (id=16039) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16039action=view) Example JSP File Example JSP File -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36179] - Error getting setter for Tag Attribute
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36179. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36179 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-14 07:10 --- Created an attachment (id=16040) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16040action=view) Example Custom Tag Lib Java File Example Custom Tag Lib Java File -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36169] New: - [PATCH] Enable chunked encoding for IIS JK connector
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36169. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36169 Summary: [PATCH] Enable chunked encoding for IIS JK connector Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.0.28 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Keywords: PatchAvailable Severity: major Priority: P1 Component: Native:JK AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] While looking through the JK connector code for the IIS integration, I found that Chunked support is never turned on. The JK codebase has support for chunked encoding, but the IIS-specific packaging doesn't have any code to enable this. Attached is a patch to enable this. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36169] - [PATCH] Enable chunked encoding for IIS JK connector
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36169. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36169 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-12 20:05 --- Created an attachment (id=16023) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16023action=view) Patch enabling chunked transfer encoding for IIS -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36153] - html:form action is blank
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36153. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36153 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-12 20:19 --- I'm currently unable to test it in a 5.5.9 environment in production where I see this issue. I will be setting up a test box today to try using a 1.5x jdk, struts 1.2.7, and tomcat 5.5.x ... -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36172] New: - getCharacterEncoding destroys POST data
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36172.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36172
Summary: getCharacterEncoding destroys POST data
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: Unknown
Platform: Sun
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Connector:Coyote
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's a known problem that most web browsers don't indicate the encoding of the
POST data in an HTTP request. If they fail to provide this information (i.e.
request.getCharacterEncoding() == null), I would like to assume UTF-8. The
problem is, calling getCharacterEncoding() destroys the POST data, I assume in
an attempt to parse out an encoding or charset parameter. In any case, I can't
find any specification of a contract that says the inputStream or
getParameter*() may be invalid after getCharacterData() and this would rather
seem like a bad idea anyway.
Sample code for a servlet receiving form input via POST:
if ( request.getCharacterEncoding() == null ) {
request.setCharacterEncoding( UTF-8 );
}
out.println( request encoding: + request.getCharacterEncoding()
);
out.println( request content-type: + request.getContentType() );
out.println( request content len: + request.getContentLength() );
out.println( request parameters by Map );
out.println( request.getParameterMap() );
The map printed is empty. If the if block is removed and the encoding is always
set to UTF-8, the map is populated correctly. If the character encoding is not
set (and getCharacterEncoding is not called but would return null), the map is
also not correct. If working with the inputStream, read returns -1 under the
same conditions that the map is empty.
My server log contains the following entry for a logged Exception. Of course,
no Exception is allowed to propogate to the level of my code.
Unable to set request encoding
java.io.UnsupportedEncodingException: hidden_value
at sun.io.Converters.getConverterClass(Converters.java:215)
at sun.io.Converters.newConverter(Converters.java:248)
at sun.io.ByteToCharConverter.getConverter(ByteToCharConverter.java:64)
at java.lang.StringCoding.decode(StringCoding.java:226)
at java.lang.String.init(String.java:320)
at java.lang.String.init(String.java:346)
at
org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteRequest$1.run(CoyoteRequest.java:1560)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at
org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteRequest.setCharacterEncoding(CoyoteRequest.java:1557)
at
com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.coyote.PECoyoteRequest.setRequestEncoding(PECoyoteRequest.java:151)
at
com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.coyote.PECoyoteRequest.getCharacterEncoding(PECoyoteRequest.java:76)
at
org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteRequestFacade.getCharacterEncoding(CoyoteRequestFacade.java:298)
at FormEchoServlet.echo(FormEchoServlet.java:51)
at FormEchoServlet.doPost(FormEchoServlet.java:37)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:767)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:860)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
at
org.apache.catalina.security.SecurityUtil$1.run(SecurityUtil.java:249)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAsPrivileged(Subject.java:500)
at
org.apache.catalina.security.SecurityUtil.execute(SecurityUtil.java:282)
at
org.apache.catalina.security.SecurityUtil.doAsPrivilege(SecurityUtil.java:165)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:257)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.access$000(ApplicationFilterChain.java:55)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain$1.run(ApplicationFilterChain.java:161)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:157)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:263)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:551
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36172] - getCharacterEncoding destroys POST data
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36172. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36172 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-12 22:36 --- This is an issue with the Sun app server. (Sun modify the Tomcat code before they use it). Looking at the stack trace, it seems a call to getCharacterEncoding() results in a call to setRequestEncoding() which then fails. The Tomcat connector code does not do this. If you can reproduce this on a vanilla Tomcat installation, please re-open this report. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36108] - Bug with FormAuthenticator
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36108. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-12 23:34 --- This works with vanilla Tomcat and is therefore a JBoss issue. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36173] New: - AssertionFailure in java.util.GregorianCalendar.computeFields() when sending response
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36173. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36173 Summary: AssertionFailure in java.util.GregorianCalendar.computeFields() when sending response Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Connector:HTTP AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We have occasional failed requests on our servers running tomcat 5.0.19 (working under java 1.5.0 with system assertions enabled via -esa option). This also seams to be an issue with newer versions of tomcat up to the current snapshot taken from the CVS repository. The following exception gets thrown: java.lang.AssertionError: cache control: inconsictency, cachedFixedDate=732122, computed=732107, date=2005-06-10T00:00:00.000Z at java.util.GregorianCalendar.computeFields(GregorianCalendar.java:2050) at java.util.GregorianCalendar.computeFields(GregorianCalendar.java:1971) at java.util.Calendar.setTimeInMillis(Calendar.java:1066) at java.util.Calendar.setTime(Calendar.java:1032) at java.text.SimpleDateFormat.format(SimpleDateFormat.java:785) at java.text.SimpleDateFormat.format(SimpleDateFormat.java:778) at java.text.DateFormat.format(DateFormat.java:314) at org.apache.tomcat.util.http.FastHttpDateFormat.getCurrentDate(FastHttpDateFormat.java:152) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.prepareResponse(Http11Processor.java:1529) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.action(Http11Processor.java:926) at org.apache.coyote.Response.action(Response.java:224) at org.apache.coyote.http11.InternalOutputBuffer.doWrite(InternalOutputBuffer.java:605) at org.apache.coyote.Response.doWrite(Response.java:586) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.OutputBuffer.realWriteBytes(OutputBuffer.java:411) at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.ByteChunk.flushBuffer(ByteChunk.java:436) at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.ByteChunk.append(ByteChunk.java:356) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.OutputBuffer.writeBytes(OutputBuffer.java:444) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.OutputBuffer.write(OutputBuffer.java:431) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteOutputStream.write(CoyoteOutputStream.java:108) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteOutputStream.write(CoyoteOutputStream.java:102) at com.scene7.is.ImageServlet.sendResponse(ImageServlet.java:197) at com.scene7.is.ImageServlet.doGet(ImageServlet.java:147) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:743) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:856) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:284) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:204) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:257) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:151) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:567) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invokeInternal(StandardContextValve.java:245) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:199) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:151) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:567) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:184) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:151) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:164) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:149) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:567) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:156) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:151) at org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:578) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:149) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:567) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:972) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat5
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36144] New: - Unable to open logs when tomcat is running
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36144. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36144 Summary: Unable to open logs when tomcat is running Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.10 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: Catalina AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using tomcat5.5.10 binaries. When I run tomcat using either catalina.bat start (any option) or startup.bat I am not able to open any log file under logs directory. I get the pop up message saying The document D:\tomcat\IX6.5\JAKART~1.10\logs\LOCALH~1.LOG is in use by another application and cannot be accessed. The only way I can see the log is by stopping the tomcat. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36144] - Unable to open logs when tomcat is running
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36144. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36144 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-11 13:02 --- That's one of the joys of using windows. You might be able to use a different text editor to view the logs. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36127] - validation with xerces 2.7.1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36127. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36127 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-11 14:01 --- It's actually section 6.2.4. I think the change is reasonable, but I'll leave the old code in commented out. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36144] - Unable to open logs when tomcat is running
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36144. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36144 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-11 20:20 --- Notepad is usually pretty tolerant. If that fails, sometimes copying the file works and then you can view the copy. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36153] New: - html:form action is blank
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36153. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36153 Summary: html:form action is blank Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.0.28 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Unknown AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm using struts 1.2.4 and sun's 1.4.2_07 jdk. When using an html:form my generated html occasionally leaves the action field blank. jsp source: html:form action=foo.do ... Sometimes my html source ends up like this: form name=fooform method=post action= ... Whereas it should look like this: form name=fooform method=post action=/webapp/foo.do ... from my struts config: form bean: form-bean name=fooform type=com.foo.FooForm/ action mapping: action path=/foo type=com.foo.FooAction scope=request name=fooform input=foo.jsp forward name=success path=/foodone.jsp redirect=true/ forward name=failure path=/foo.jsp redirect=false/ /action This code works fine for a few days, and then I start getting the blank action. After that, I need to restart Tomcat. It is possible that this bug exists in Struts 1.2.4. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36153] - html:form action is blank
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36153. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36153 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-12 01:21 --- Does it happen with 5.5.9? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36155] New: - tomcat chooses wrong host if using mod_jk
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36155. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36155 Summary: tomcat chooses wrong host if using mod_jk Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Native:JK AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, my config is as follows: tomcat 5.5.9 knows two hosts, let's say the host host1 and the host host2. http://host1/ is basically a jsp-page echoing the string host1 - http://host2/ echos the string host2. apache 2.0.54 is configured with two vhost with ServerName host1 and host2. Both servers have a ServerAlias too - the one has ServerAlias alias1, the other has ServerAlias alias2 mod-jk 1.2.14 only knows one worker. My worker.properties looks like this: worker.list=worker1 worker.worker1.type=ajp13 worker.worker1.host=127.0.0.1 A very simple config. Both apache vhosts contain a JkMount *.jsp worker1 Apache's UseCanonialName is on and Tomcats AJP-connector has useIPVHosts turned on. Therefor tomcat will chose the host by the server-name that mod_jk sends. So calling http://alias1/ results in a page containing the string host1, and calling http://alias2/ results in a page containing the string host2. The problem: Sometimes (not always and very selden) http://alias1 returns the string host2 and http://alias2 returns the string host1. I'm not sure, where the problem is, but i'm almost sure it's mod_jk - although i don't know, what should go wrong. I now defined a second worker with the same address and each of apache's vhosts use a different worker. The error didn't come up yet. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36109] - Unsuported JNI version 65537
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36109. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36109 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-10 08:00 --- This is INVALID simply for the reason that it's a commons-daemon problem, not a Tomcat problem. That having been said, it's even INVALID as a commons-daemon problem since it's simply saying that your JVM version isn't supported. I'm just too lazy to lookup the duplicate for a cite :). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35128] - Cannot pass -ea to Tomcat JRE
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35128. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35128 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-10 08:19 --- (In reply to comment #6) Actually, -ea does not work even with the patch provided by Remy so I'm reopening this issue. On a related note -server doesn't work either. Is this one and the same issue or do I need to file a separate bug report? On a related note, filing a bug for -server will politely get a response to RTFM, and will be marked as INVALID. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35128] - Cannot pass -ea to Tomcat JRE
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35128. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35128 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-10 08:26 --- William, I am discussing the WinXP service configuration manager. I can't insert -server into the startup script file as I would under Linux (because there no longer is one under Windows). I also ran a Google search for server vm across the online documentation and found nothing useful there so please if this *is* documented somewhere I would appreciate you pointing out where. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35128] - Cannot pass -ea to Tomcat JRE
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35128. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35128 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-10 08:29 --- Nevermind, I just realized I need to change the Java Virtual Machine value under the Java tab. All this time I was looking for an option of client or server and it never occured to me I'd have to specify the full DLL path :) Thanks anyway! -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35128] - Cannot pass -ea to Tomcat JRE
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35128. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35128 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-10 09:31 --- This works for me. Please do not reopen the report. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36113] New: - Session persistence for objects with primitive types
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36113.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36113
Summary: Session persistence for objects with primitive types
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: Unknown
Platform: All
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Catalina
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When there is a primitive data type (like int or boolean) contained in an
object which is stored in a session, a persistence will fail when reading back
the session data.
This is caused by a bug in org.apache.catalina.util.CustomObjectInputStream,
which does not care for primitive types, as ObjectInputstream is doing since
JDK1.4
The following code is copied from the SUN Java sources and works correctly:
/** table mapping primitive type names to corresponding class objects */
private static final HashMap primClasses = new HashMap(8, 1.0F);
static {
primClasses.put(boolean, boolean.class);
primClasses.put(byte, byte.class);
primClasses.put(char, char.class);
primClasses.put(short, short.class);
primClasses.put(int, int.class);
primClasses.put(long, long.class);
primClasses.put(float, float.class);
primClasses.put(double, double.class);
primClasses.put(void, void.class);
}
public Class resolveClass(ObjectStreamClass classDesc)
throws ClassNotFoundException, IOException {
try {
return Class.forName(classDesc.getName(), false, classLoader);
}
catch (ClassNotFoundException ex) {
Class cl = (Class) primClasses.get(classDesc.getName ());
if (cl != null) {
return cl;
} else {
throw ex;
}
}
}
This leads to the ability to store any primitive type (like a castor object)
inside a persisted session. Maybe somebody can commit this to the tomcat trunk.
Thanks, Marcus
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36121] New: - Including JSP's changes working directory
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36121.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36121
Summary: Including JSP's changes working directory
Product: Tomcat 4
Version: 4.1.31
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: Connector:JK/AJP
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adding to the headers of the bug;
Apache 2.0.54 was used with mod_jk 1.2.13 on Redhat 9
Hi,
One of our customers uses SSI (mod_include) to include their jsp's
eg file index.shtml (located in /web/customer/www)
!--#include virtual=top.html--
!--#include virtual=active/news.jsp?${QUERY_STRING}--
!--#include virtual=bottom.html--
What happens is that top and news are displayed correctly, but bottom fails
with [an error occurred while processing this directive]. If we move the
include of bottom.html above the jsp line it works (besides from the webpage
not displaying as desired :)
The errorlog contains the following lines after requesting the page from apache;
File does not exist: /web/customer/www/active/bottom.html
unable to include bottom.html in parsed file /web/customer/www/index.shtml
If found Bug #34232 mentioning the same, but it was discarded as being apache
and/or mod_include. I didn't find any references to a new(er) ticket in ASF. The
current workaround for our customer would be to update their files to 'include
virtual=../bottom.html' or revert back to their original exec cgi statements
(which worked, but we agreed with them upon that being deprecated).
For some reason the include virtual (or include file which causes the same)
that executes the 'jsp' sets the current working directory to active instead
of going 'back' to the directory where index.shtml was parsed from.
Any suggestions or options are welcome,
Tom
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36123] New: - TOMCAT FAILS TO START WITH JDK1.3
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36123. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36123 Summary: TOMCAT FAILS TO START WITH JDK1.3 Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.10 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: Catalina AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Running.txt says === Running Tomcat With J2SE Version 1.4 or 1.3 === but when tried running with jdk13x these are errors displayed C:\Documents and Settings\bhatsh\Desktop\jakarta-tomcat-5.5.10\bincatalina.bat version Using CATALINA_BASE: D:\tomcat\IX6.5\jakarta-tomcat-5.5.10 Using CATALINA_HOME: D:\tomcat\IX6.5\jakarta-tomcat-5.5.10 Using CATALINA_TMPDIR: D:\tomcat\IX6.5\jakarta-tomcat-5.5.10\temp Using JAVA_HOME: C:\jdk1.3.1_16 Exception in thread main java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: org/apache/catalina/util/ServerInfo (Unsupported major.minor version 48.0) at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass0(Native Method) at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:488) at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass (SecureClassLoader.java:106) at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:243) at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$100(URLClassLoader.java:51) at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:190) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:183) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:294) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:288) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:250) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:310) We found the same behaviour on Tru64 OS as well. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36127] New: - validation with xerces 2.7.1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36127. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36127 Summary: validation with xerces 2.7.1 Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: All URL: http://pastebin.com/333771 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Jasper AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, When using Tomcat with the last xerces version (2.7.1), there is a problem on jsp validation. (Note that next Tomcat version will have also 2.7.1 version (as it was put in the changelog) in current CVS tree). One way to fix it is in the org/apache/jasper/compiler/JspDocumentParser.java file. By replacing : factory.setFeature( http://xml.org/sax/features/validation;, validating); by : factory.setValidating(validating); (Patch at the end) Note that the setValidating() method is also used by digester which is used by Tomcat as other places. See getFactory() method. http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-commons/digester/src/java/org/apache/commons/digester/Digester.java?view=markup I provide a sample (you could extract the xml snippet if you want to test it in Tomcat directly without the sample Class). I tried this example with Sun JDK 1.4.2_08, JDK 5_update4 and with xerces 2.6.2 and 2.7.1 (with endorsed java -Djava.endorsed.dirs=...) and with factory.setValidating(validating); it works in all cases. (like in Digester). It will be fine if it could be fixed in CVS for next Tomcat version. Regards, Florent Index: JspDocumentParser.java === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler/JspDocumentParser.java,v retrieving revision 1.84 diff -u -r1.84 JspDocumentParser.java --- JspDocumentParser.java 30 Mar 2005 20:27:22 - 1.84 +++ JspDocumentParser.java 10 Aug 2005 15:22:04 - @@ -1370,9 +1370,10 @@ factory.setFeature( http://xml.org/sax/features/namespace-prefixes;, true); -factory.setFeature( -http://xml.org/sax/features/validation;, -validating); +factory.setValidating(validating); // Configure the parser SAXParser saxParser = factory.newSAXParser(); // Configure the parser SAXParser saxParser = factory.newSAXParser(); -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36127] - validation with xerces 2.7.1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36127. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36127 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-10 17:30 --- Created an attachment (id=15995) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15995action=view) Example reproducing the problem Class reproducing the jasper problem with xerces 2.7.1 java -Djava.endorsed.dirs=path with xerces2.7.1 jars inside sax.Sax -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36127] - validation with xerces 2.7.1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36127. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36127 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-10 17:33 --- Created an attachment (id=15996) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15996action=view) Patch for fixing this issue Patch for fixing this issue (with xerces 2.7.1), also it works with other xerces version and JDK -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36123] - TOMCAT FAILS TO START WITH JDK1.3
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36123. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36123 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-10 18:00 --- Ok, so there's a small discrepancy in the docs. Tomcat 5.5 requires Java 5 (it can also run on JDK 1.4 with an additional binary bundle). That's it, no JDK 1.3. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36127] - validation with xerces 2.7.1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36127. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36127 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-10 18:00 --- Wouldn't it be better to set both ? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36127] - validation with xerces 2.7.1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36127. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36127 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-10 18:13 --- It works for me only with one thing. Also, only xml with DTD have to be validated in this case of JSP (no schema). (Section JSP 6.2.4) So I think the use of only factory.setValidating(validating); will be OK. Regards, Florent -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36133] New: - Support JSS SSL implementation
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36133. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36133 Summary: Support JSS SSL implementation Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Unknown AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tomcat currently supports JSSE and operates only on JKS or PKCS12 format keystores. This enhancement is to have Tomcat to support JSS which implements cryptographic operations in native code using the NSS libraries. JSS is also FIPS compliant. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36136] New: - Refactor the login and error page forward to protected methods
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36136. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36136 Summary: Refactor the login and error page forward to protected methods Product: Tomcat 5 Version: Nightly Build Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Catalina AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The attached patch refactors the current org.apache.catalina.authenticator.FormAuthenticator forwarding to the login and error pages to protected methods to facilitate customization by subclasses. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36136] - Refactor the login and error page forward to protected methods
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36136. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36136 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-11 01:31 --- Created an attachment (id=16007) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16007action=view) Factors out login/error page fowarding to protected methods -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36138] New: - mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36138. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36138 Summary: mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load Product: Tomcat 5 Version: Unknown Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Native:JK AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is the mod_jk patch I mentioned on the tomcat-dev mailing list on August 6. The patch adds a new lb.method option 'B' for 'Busyness'. The algorithm picks the lbworker with the lowest current load, based on how many requests the worker is currently serving (the Busy column in the jkstatus page). This number is divided by the worker's lbfactor, and the lowest value (least busy) worker is picked. We tested about 25-30 threads against 6 load-balanced tomcats with requests that take about 250ms each to complete. Using the Busyness algorithm improved our throughput from 12-16 requests per second to 60+ requests per second, and watching the jkstatus page showed that all servers were kept evenly busy. If one particular server started lagging, its Busy value increased, so it received fewer requests. If a request is received when none of the workers are busy, this algorithm is effectively an evenly-weighted round-robin. Note that we found some race conditions with the code that updates the various lb status values, especially the lbworker busy value, which our algorithm requires to be accurate. To fix this, we had to refactor some of the shared memory and critical-section locking code, by moving the lock into get_most_suitable_worker() (jk_lb_worker.c). We also found some problems that would cause the 'busy' value to be set to less than zero (displaying MAX_INT - 1, for example, in jkstatus). We fixed this by setting the busy value to 0 if it is ever less than 0. See jk_lb_worker.c lines 389-400. Finally, we added a new column to the jkstatus page. The Ssc column now reports the number of times the worker was reused from sticky session. See jk_shm.c line 89, and jk_lb_worker.c line 584. We have load-tested this patch under apache 2.0.50, and we've also been running it in a busy production site for almost a week. This patch is donated by Andrew Hudson and Chris Lamprecht. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36138] - mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36138. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36138 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-11 06:12 --- Created an attachment (id=16009) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16009action=view) New load balancing algorithm for mod_jk -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36087] - Tomcat 5.5.10 Service will not start in Windows XP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 10:37 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35930 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35930] - Tomcat 5.5.10 not starting on Windows XP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 10:37 --- *** Bug 36087 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36102] New: - jk 1.2.14 - Worker actions do not persist
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102 Summary: jk 1.2.14 - Worker actions do not persist Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.1.27 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Server 2003 Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: Unknown AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I was told by the jk connector component developer to open a new bug here. He closed the one in his queue as works-for-him (see bug # 35901). So here goes... = Jk version in use is a 1.2.14 binary. Scenario: open jkstatus in broswer click worker #1, check Stopped and Update Worker. Stat now shows stopped. Open second browser. Navigate to the same jkstatus page. Worker #1 stat is OK. Both browsers are IE5 one located on my workstation, one the browser for a server, so broswer cash should not be involved. The same symptoms are seen in a single browser instance if you click worker #1 again, but not on a simple page refresh. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36102] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker actions do not persist
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 15:36 --- Created an attachment (id=15986) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15986action=view) ISAPI Redirect log -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36102] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker actions do not persist
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 15:36 --- Created an attachment (id=15987) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15987action=view) uriworkermap.properties -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36102] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker actions do not persist
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 15:37 --- Created an attachment (id=15988) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15988action=view) workers.properties -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34526] - Truncated content in decompressed requests from mod_deflate
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 15:41 ---
It looks like the AJP protocol cannot stream request bodies of unknown length.
There are two cases where this might happen: for a chunked request body, or if
there are request input filters in use such as mod_deflate.
The correct thing to do here in mod_jk is:
if (r-proto_input_filters != r-input_filters
|| apr_table_get(r-headers_in, Transfer-Encoding)) {
/* refuse to handle the body */
}
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34526] - Truncated content in decompressed requests from mod_deflate
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 15:48 --- Does this mean mod_jk will simply not accept mod_deflate'd or chunked uploads? If so, that would buy us nothing... -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36087] - Tomcat 5.5.10 Service will not start in Windows XP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35930] - Tomcat 5.5.10 not starting on Windows XP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 16:45 --- (In reply to comment #2) Wouldn't it be a good thing to have this defined already after installation, like catalina.home? Yes why isn't there any documentation on your websit to resolve this issue with what you mentioned. But do you need to make this and environmental variable in Windows XP ? is that what you mean? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34526] - Truncated content in decompressed requests from mod_deflate
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 17:04 --- (In reply to comment #8) It looks like the AJP protocol cannot stream request bodies of unknown length. The AJP protocol handles request bodies of unknown length perfectly well. It doesn't handle rogue modules like mod_deflate lying to it. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34526] - Truncated content in decompressed requests from mod_deflate
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 17:12 --- So does this really mean that mod_deflate should simply not give a content-length when it does not know it? That would seem (quite) reasonable (and correct). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35930] - Tomcat 5.5.10 not starting on Windows XP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 18:43 --- Ralph, I'am not sure if your question was addressed to me, but this bug should definitly be fixed in the downloadable windows version, because of the missing environment varaible. But this can be only done by the tomcat developers. jakarta-tomcat-5.5.10.exe has this bug, but startup.bat in jakarta-tomcat- 5.5.10.tar.gz sets the variable, so its just an issue with the .exe -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35930] - Tomcat 5.5.10 not starting on Windows XP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 20:13 --- I marked the bug as fixed, which means the bug has been fixed, and I provided you with an easy workaround, so can you please stop whining ? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36108] New: - Bug with FormAuthenticator
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36108. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36108 Summary: Bug with FormAuthenticator Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.0.30 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Catalina AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using apache with JBoss 3.2.5 (Tomcat 5.0.30). After logging in I get a HTTP Status 400 - Invalid direct reference to form login page. It appears that the requestURI is null when it comes to org.jboss.web.tomcat.tc4.authenticator.FormAuthenticator Could you update the FormAuthenticator to look up the j_uri from the request parameter when the saveRequestURI is null? I'll appreciate the feedback. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36108] - Bug with FormAuthenticator
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36108. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major OS/Version|other |All Priority|P2 |P1 -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36109] New: - Unsuported JNI version 65537
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36109. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36109 Summary: Unsuported JNI version 65537 Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.0.27 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P1 Component: Unknown AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have installed Apache tomcat 5.0.27. I have windows xp. I tried to run the apache tomcat 5.0.27. But it was not run sucessfully. I got the message in log file as follows 2005-08-10 09:58:00] [info] Running Service... [2005-08-10 09:58:00] [info] Starting service... [2005-08-10 09:58:00] [364 javajni.c] [error] Unsuported JNI version 65537 [2005-08-10 09:58:00] [770 prunsrv.c] [error] Failed initializing java C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Tomcat 5.0\bin\bootstrap.jar [2005-08-10 09:58:00] [982 prunsrv.c] [error] ServiceStart returned 2 [2005-08-10 09:58:00] [info] Run service finished. [2005-08-10 09:58:00] [info] Procrun finished. Please help me out on this -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35128] - Cannot pass -ea to Tomcat JRE
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35128. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35128 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-10 07:47 --- Actually, -ea does not work even with the patch provided by Remy so I'm reopening this issue. On a related note -server doesn't work either. Is this one and the same issue or do I need to file a separate bug report? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35901] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker stop action does not hold
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #15926|JK log. Loglever=trace |JK log. Loglevel=trace description|| -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35901] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker stop action does not hold
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-08 17:05 --- This works although it might give some problems with already opened browsers and hitting 'refresh'. If you open a new browser instance the values will be shown correctly. Even for the existing browsers the correct values will be shown after 60 seconds, and that depends on the browser itself an how it deals with 'Pragma: no-cache' header. I see this as irrelevant for any 'normal' usage of the lb manager. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35901] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker stop action does not hold
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-08 17:21 --- (In reply to comment #8) This works although it might give some problems with already opened browsers and hitting 'refresh'. If you open a new browser instance the values will be shown correctly. Even for the existing browsers the correct values will be shown after 60 seconds, and that depends on the browser itself an how it deals with 'Pragma: no-cache' header. I see this as irrelevant for any 'normal' usage of the lb manager. A Browser refresh retained the settings after the use of the Disabled check box and the Update Worker button. values will be shown correctly. Do you mean by this, that the workers.properties will be read and those values displayed. If this is true, then the update worker dynamically is pretty worthless. 'Pragma: no-cache' header The application I support uses this header. We've never had any problems with it. I see this as irrelevant for any 'normal' usage of the lb manager. One has to wonder what you call 'normal'? Let me frame my response from the perspective of someone moving from JK2 to jk1.2.14. We made heavy use of the Disabled flag in the workers2.properties to shut off new sessions to a worker (jvmroute). Under JK2, when this setting was changed and the reset link used on the jkstatus page, the disabled setting was retained until changed. My expectations for jk1.2.14 were that it would act in a similar manner. If that was a bad assumption, then what does dynamic configuration mean. I've read every scrap of doc I can find on this topic. If I missed something, please point me to where this is discussed. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35901] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker stop action does not hold
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-08 17:32 --- Please do not reopen this case. If you think that this is still a problem then open a thread on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] All that I can say is that it works for me. If I update any param it is correctly shown in the browser. It is also correctly shown in any newly opened browser. I agree that there might be problems with already opened browsers, but I really have no idea why, and like said, I suspect it has to be related with browser catching the data. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36087] New: - Tomcat 5.5.10 Service will not start in Windows XP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087 Summary: Tomcat 5.5.10 Service will not start in Windows XP Product: Tomcat 5 Version: Nightly Build Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: Unknown AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have reviewed your reported bugs and did an extensive search via google on this issue to no avail. I installed Tomcat 5.5.10 and have not been able to get the service to start. I already had the Sun Java setting in my envirornmental settings. I am using MyEclipse, Eclipse and Sun Java 1.5 on my Windows XP platform. Read all the recommend thing to try from the issues with names longer than 255 char(I did not have this issue), reinstalled it 3 time to various directories to ensure no directory name with spaces(this did not resolve issue). Finally had to go back to Tomcat 5.5.9 and it is working without issue so far. There were also no errors in any of the log files in Tomcat that would be of any use to anyone. Just that it was trying to start the service. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36088] New: - Add RUNNING.txt etc to fulldocs archive
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36088. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36088 Summary: Add RUNNING.txt etc to fulldocs archive Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.10 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Native:Packaging AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Might be useful to add RUNNING.txt, RELEASE-NOTES.txt and server-startup.txt to the fulldocs archive. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug report for Tomcat 3 [2005/08/07]
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned| | | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved) | | | +-+ | | | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major | | | | MIN=Minor NOR=Normal ENH=Enhancement | | | | +-+ | | | | Date Posted | | | | | +--+ | | | | | Description | | | | | | | | 2350|Ver|Nor|2001-06-27|ServletConfig.getInitParameter() requires url-patt| | 2478|Opn|Cri|2001-07-06|Passing Session variables between JSP's and Servle| | 4551|Opn|Nor|2001-10-31|Ctx( /tt01 ): IOException in: R( /tt01 + /com/abc/| | 4980|New|Min|2001-11-20|Startup message indicates incorrect log file | | 4994|New|Nor|2001-11-21|Tomcat needs a mechanism for clean and certain shu| | 5064|New|Cri|2001-11-25|Socket write error when include files is more than| | 5108|New|Maj|2001-11-26|Docs for Tomcat 3.2.x appear to be for Tomcat 3.3 | | 5137|New|Nor|2001-11-27|Null pointer in class loader after attempting to r| | 5160|Unc|Maj|2001-11-28|'IllegalStateException' | | 5331|New|Nor|2001-12-09|getPathInfo vs URL normalization | | 5510|New|Blk|2001-12-19|How to call ejb deployed in JBoss from Tomcat serv| | 5756|New|Nor|2002-01-08|jspc.bat exits with wrong ERRORLEVEL | | 5797|New|Nor|2002-01-10|UnCatched ? StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Strin| | 6027|New|Maj|2002-01-25|Tomcat Automatically shuts down as service | | 6168|New|Blk|2002-02-01|IllegalStateException | | 6451|New|Cri|2002-02-14|Stackoverflow | | 6478|New|Enh|2002-02-14|Default Tomcat Encoding | | 6488|Ver|Maj|2002-02-15|Error: 304. Apparent bug in default ErrorHandler c| | 6648|New|Nor|2002-02-25|jakarta-servletapi build with java 1.4 javadoc err| | 6702|New|Cri|2002-02-27|win 2k services not working | | 6796|New|Cri|2002-03-01|Tomcat dies periodically | | 6989|New|Maj|2002-03-08|Unable to read tld file during parallel JSP compil| | 7013|New|Cri|2002-03-10|Entering a servlet path with non-ISO8859-1 charact| | 7227|New|Nor|2002-03-19|error-code directive don't work | | 7626|New|Nor|2002-03-29|classloader not working properly | | 7652|New|Cri|2002-04-01|Tomcat stalls periodically| | 7785|New|Blk|2002-04-06|tomcat bug in context reloading | | 7863|New|Maj|2002-04-09|I have a problem when running Tomcat with IIS | | 8187|New|Cri|2002-04-17|Errors when Tomcat used with MS Access database | | 8239|New|Cri|2002-04-18|Resource temporary unavailable| | 8263|New|Cri|2002-04-18|url-pattern easy to circumvent| | 9250|New|Maj|2002-05-20|outOfMemoryError | | 9367|New|Maj|2002-05-23|HttpSessionBindingEvent not thrown for HttpSession| | 9390|New|Nor|2002-05-24|jasper compilation error in tomcat| | 9480|New|Nor|2002-05-29|Data connection pooling | | 9607|New|Maj|2002-06-04|precompile JSP| | 9737|Ver|Nor|2002-06-10|ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when sending just p| |10047|New|Cri|2002-06-20|IllegalStateException | |10202|New|Maj|2002-06-25|Tomcat is not responding in time | |10357|Unc|Blk|2002-06-30|java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Short Read| |10406|New|Cri|2002-07-02|IllegalStateException | |11087|New|Blk|2002-07-23|IllegalStateException | |11286|New|Maj|2002-07-30|Tomcat threads not respond if increase JVM size | |11466|New|Nor|2002-08-05|ContextManager: SocketException reading request | |12156|New|Cri|2002-08-29|Apache and Tomcat 3.3.1 Interworking problem | |12194|New|Maj|2002-08-30|Tomcat does not send WWW-Authenticate header | |12852|New|Nor|2002-09-20|May be error in _jspService() - out.flushBuffers(| |14386|New|Maj|2002-11-08|Date headers corrupted using setDateHeader| |15632|New|Nor|2002-12-23|Problem with the Tomcat Sessions Parameter on URL | |16363|New|Cri|2003-01-23|Stack Overflow accessing compiled JSP - Tomcat 3.2| |17081|New|Min|2003-02-14|Some javadoc comment fixes| |17915
Bug report for Tomcat 4 [2005/08/07]
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned| | | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved) | | | +-+ | | | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major | | | | MIN=Minor NOR=Normal ENH=Enhancement | | | | +-+ | | | | Date Posted | | | | | +--+ | | | | | Description | | | | | | | | 3839|Opn|Enh|2001-09-26|Problem bookmarking login page| | 4227|Opn|Enh|2001-10-17|Invalid CGI path | | 5329|New|Enh|2001-12-08|NT Service exits startup before Tomcat is finished| | 5795|New|Enh|2002-01-10|Catalina Shutdown relies on localhost causing prob| | 5829|New|Enh|2002-01-13|StandardManager needs to cope with sessions throwi| | 5985|New|Enh|2002-01-23|Tomcat should perform a more restrictive validatio| | 6600|Opn|Enh|2002-02-20|enodeURL adds 'jsession' when 'isRequestedSessionI| | 6614|New|Enh|2002-02-21|Have Bootstrap and StandardClassLoader use the sam| | 6671|New|Enh|2002-02-25|Simple custom tag example uses old declaration sty| | 7043|New|Enh|2002-03-12|database user and password for JDBC Based Store | | 7374|New|Enh|2002-03-22|Apache Tomcat/4.0.1 message on standard output| | 7676|New|Enh|2002-04-02|Allow name property to use match experssions in h| | 7723|New|Enh|2002-04-03|[patch] additional factory for org.apache.naming.f| | 7831|New|Nor|2002-04-08|[PATCH] JNDIRealm does not work with CLIENT-CERT a| | 7880|Ver|Cri|2002-04-09|If a TLV flags flags an error during the translati| | 8026|New|Enh|2002-04-12|Exceptions in StandardHostDeployer.addChild are lo| | 8275|Ver|Min|2002-04-18|ContextConfig.start() attempts to create a $CATALI| | 8323|New|Enh|2002-04-20|No support for running the 64 bit JVM | | 8343|New|Enh|2002-04-21|adding a absorber logger class to org.apache.ca| | 8441|New|Enh|2002-04-23|Command line files for NetWare| | 8705|New|Enh|2002-05-01|SessionListener should extend EventListener | | 8744|New|Enh|2002-05-02|No way to configure/extend runtime classloaders. | | 8776|New|Enh|2002-05-03|The session url encoding under somce circumstances| | 9027|New|Cri|2002-05-13|The Tomcat Servlet Container use the identity spec| | 9050|Ver|Nor|2002-05-13|GET Query Parameters Require an Equal Sign| | 9227|New|Enh|2002-05-19|Allow an empty value of a pathname in the Standard| | 9456|New|Enh|2002-05-28|Problem saving server.xml file: invalid XML markup| | 9511|New|Enh|2002-05-30|Object instantiation optimization in StandardSessi| | 9629|New|Enh|2002-06-05|Fix ServletContext.getResourcePaths to match spec | | 9745|New|Enh|2002-06-10|extern cache mgt bug for conditionally dynamic pag| | 9852|New|Enh|2002-06-13|Odd Digest and Realm Behaviour| |10021|New|Enh|2002-06-19|Include upgrade option in installer | |10026|Opn|Nor|2002-06-19|manager/stop and manager/remove | |10060|New|Enh|2002-06-20|Make the common and shared class loaders look in c| |10120|New|Enh|2002-06-21|Custom realm and shared instalation. | |10225|New|Enh|2002-06-25|ANT Tasks Error Situation | |10335|New|Enh|2002-06-28|[RFE,patch] Make JAASRealm more flexible | |10457|New|Enh|2002-07-03|Patch submission for DefaultServlet/WebdavServlet | |10526|New|Enh|2002-07-06|Authenticators do not always cache the Principal | |10541|New|Nor|2002-07-08|Content-length header should be automatically set | |10565|Opn|Enh|2002-07-08|shutdown hook problem: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundE| |10691|New|Enh|2002-07-11|staring tomcat gives indication that tomcat is sta| |10699|New|Enh|2002-07-11|Apache SOAP 2.3 will not operate properly | |10972|New|Enh|2002-07-19|Realm without className in server.xml produces N| |11069|Opn|Enh|2002-07-23|Tomcat not flag error if tld is outside of /WEB-IN| |11129|New|Enh|2002-07-24|New valve for putting the sessionIDs in the reques| |11248|New|Enh|2002-07-29|DefaultServlet doesn't send expires header| |11754|Opn|Enh|2002-08-15|Synchronous shutdown script - shutdown.sh should w| |12069|New|Enh|2002-08-27|Creation of more HttpSession objects for one previ| |12428|Opn|Maj|2002-09-09|request.getUserPrincipal(): Misinterpretation of s| |12658|New|Enh|2002-09-15|a proxy host and port at the Host element level | |12766|New|Enh
Bug report for Watchdog [2005/08/07]
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned| | | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved) | | | +-+ | | | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major | | | | MIN=Minor NOR=Normal ENH=Enhancement | | | | +-+ | | | | Date Posted | | | | | +--+ | | | | | Description | | | | | | | | 278|Unc|Nor|2000-12-04|Bug in GetParameterValuesTestServlet.java file Bug| | 279|Unc|Nor|2000-12-04|Logical Error in GetParameterValuesTestServlet Bug| | 469|Unc|Nor|2001-01-17|in example-taglib.tld urn should be uri BugRat| | 470|Unc|Nor|2001-01-17|FAIL positiveForward.jsp and positiveInclude.jsp B| | 9634|New|Enh|2002-06-05|No tests exist for ServletContext.getResourcePaths| |10703|New|Enh|2002-07-11|Need to test getRequestURI after RequestDispatcher| |11336|New|Enh|2002-07-31|Test wrapped path methods with RD.foward()| |11663|New|Maj|2002-08-13|JSP precompile tests rely on Jasper specific behav| |11664|New|Maj|2002-08-13|A sweep is needed of all Watchdog 4.0 tag librarie| |11665|New|Maj|2002-08-13|ServletToJSPErrorPageTest and ServletToServletErro| |11666|New|Maj|2002-08-13|SetBufferSize_1TestServlet is invalid.| |14004|New|Maj|2002-10-28|Incorrent behaviour of all attribute-related lifec| |15504|New|Nor|2002-12-18|JSP positiveGetValues test relies on order preserv| |24649|New|Nor|2003-11-12|getRemoteHost fails when agent has uppercase chara| |29398|New|Nor|2004-06-04|Update site and note current status | |35058|New|Nor|2005-05-25|test | |35353|Unc|Min|2005-06-14|test | |35354|New|Nor|2005-06-14|ts| |35395|New|Cri|2005-06-17|test | +-+---+---+--+--+ | Total 19 bugs | +---+ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36055] - HTTPS connection does not work without sslProtocol attribute
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36055. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36055 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-06 10:48 --- This was fixed a few months ago and is included in 5.5.10 onwards. See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-devm=111809350408866w=2 for details. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36057] New: - The method 'getUserPrincipal()' in class 'org.apache.catalina.connector.Request' returns a not null value after the session has been invalidated and/or recreated
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36057. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36057 Summary: The method 'getUserPrincipal()' in class 'org.apache.catalina.connector.Request' returns a not null value after the session has been invalidated and/or recreated Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Catalina AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] When you invalidate the session with a call to the method 'session.invalidate()' and/or recreate it with a call to the method 'request.getSession(true)', a call to the method 'request.getUserPrincipal()' continues to return a not null value just after. To solve this problem, I think you should reinitialize the value of the field 'userPrincipal' to 'null' in the method 'doGetSession(boolean create)' of the class 'org.apache.catalina.connector.Request' when the parameter 'create' is equal to 'true'. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36057] - The method 'getUserPrincipal()' in class 'org.apache.catalina.connector.Request' returns a not null value after the session has been invalidated and/or recreated
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36057. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36057 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-06 21:25 --- Section 12.5.3.1 of the servlet spec is clear that the logout of a Form-auth user by invalidating the session applies to subsequent requests only. If you need this fuctionality in your webapp, you can easily get it by wrapping the Request at the same time that you invalidate the session. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35901] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker stop action does not hold
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |critical -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35901] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker stop action does not hold
Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be submitted through our online email form. To locate our online email form, we ask that you visit our Help Desk at Customer Support at www.ballystore.com/helpdesk and choose FAQ/Contact Us under Online Store Information. Then, choose the subject that will address your question and send us an email through our online email form. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Sincerely, Customer Support at www.ballystore.com Original Message Follows: Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be submitted through our online email form. To locate our online email form, we ask that you visit our Help Desk at Customer Support at www.ballystore.com/helpdesk and choose FAQ/Contact Us under Online Store Information. Then, choose the subject that will address your question and send us an email through our online email form. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Sincerely, Customer Support at www.ballystore.com Original Message Follows: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |critical -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message, including any attachments, is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this communication is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy any and all copies of the original message. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message, including any attachments, is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this communication is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy any and all copies of the original message. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35901] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker stop action does not hold
Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be submitted through our online email form. To locate our online email form, we ask that you visit our Help Desk at Customer Support at www.ballystore.com/helpdesk and choose FAQ/Contact Us under Online Store Information. Then, choose the subject that will address your question and send us an email through our online email form. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Sincerely, Customer Support at www.ballystore.com Original Message Follows: Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be submitted through our online email form. To locate our online email form, we ask that you visit our Help Desk at Customer Support at www.ballystore.com/helpdesk and choose FAQ/Contact Us under Online Store Information. Then, choose the subject that will address your question and send us an email through our online email form. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Sincerely, Customer Support at www.ballystore.com Original Message Follows: Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be submitted through our online email form. To locate our online email form, we ask that you visit our Help Desk at Customer Support at www.ballystore.com/helpdesk and choose FAQ/Contact Us under Online Store Information. Then, choose the subject that will address your question and send us an email through our online email form. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Sincerely, Customer Support at www.ballystore.com Original Message Follows: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |critical -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message, including any attachments, is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this communication is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy any and all copies of the original message. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message, including any attachments, is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this communication is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy any and all copies of the original message. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message, including any attachments, is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this communication is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy any and all copies of the original message. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35901] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker stop action does not hold
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-05 22:06 --- Created an attachment (id=15926) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15926action=view) JK log. Loglever=trace See most recent comments -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35901] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker stop action does not hold
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-05 22:07 --- Created an attachment (id=15927) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15927action=view) workers.properties -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35901] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker stop action does not hold
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-05 22:07 --- Created an attachment (id=15928) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15928action=view) uriworkermap.properties -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35901] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker stop action does not hold
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-05 22:09 --- Attached log reflect the following activity. Opened jkstatus in browser. Clicked on apj13 Tomcat1. Checked the Disabled check box. Clicked Update Worker. tomcat1 stat=Disabled. Opened jkstatus in second browser. tomcat1 stat=OK. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35901] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker stop action does not hold
Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be submitted through our online email form. To locate our online email form, we ask that you visit our Help Desk at Customer Support at www.ballystore.com/helpdesk and choose FAQ/Contact Us under Online Store Information. Then, choose the subject that will address your question and send us an email through our online email form. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Sincerely, Customer Support at www.ballystore.com Original Message Follows: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-05 22:07 --- Created an attachment (id=15927) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15927action=view) workers.properties -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message, including any attachments, is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this communication is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy any and all copies of the original message. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35901] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker stop action does not hold
Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be submitted through our online email form. To locate our online email form, we ask that you visit our Help Desk at Customer Support at www.ballystore.com/helpdesk and choose FAQ/Contact Us under Online Store Information. Then, choose the subject that will address your question and send us an email through our online email form. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Sincerely, Customer Support at www.ballystore.com Original Message Follows: Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be submitted through our online email form. To locate our online email form, we ask that you visit our Help Desk at Customer Support at www.ballystore.com/helpdesk and choose FAQ/Contact Us under Online Store Information. Then, choose the subject that will address your question and send us an email through our online email form. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Sincerely, Customer Support at www.ballystore.com Original Message Follows: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-05 22:07 --- Created an attachment (id=15927) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15927action=view) workers.properties -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message, including any attachments, is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this communication is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy any and all copies of the original message. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message, including any attachments, is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this communication is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy any and all copies of the original message. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35901] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker stop action does not hold
Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be submitted through our online email form. To locate our online email form, we ask that you visit our Help Desk at Customer Support at www.ballystore.com/helpdesk and choose FAQ/Contact Us under Online Store Information. Then, choose the subject that will address your question and send us an email through our online email form. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Sincerely, Customer Support at www.ballystore.com Original Message Follows: Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be submitted through our online email form. To locate our online email form, we ask that you visit our Help Desk at Customer Support at www.ballystore.com/helpdesk and choose FAQ/Contact Us under Online Store Information. Then, choose the subject that will address your question and send us an email through our online email form. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Sincerely, Customer Support at www.ballystore.com Original Message Follows: Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be submitted through our online email form. To locate our online email form, we ask that you visit our Help Desk at Customer Support at www.ballystore.com/helpdesk and choose FAQ/Contact Us under Online Store Information. Then, choose the subject that will address your question and send us an email through our online email form. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Sincerely, Customer Support at www.ballystore.com Original Message Follows: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35901 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-05 22:07 --- Created an attachment (id=15927) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15927action=view) workers.properties -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message, including any attachments, is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this communication is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy any and all copies of the original message. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message, including any attachments, is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this communication is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy any and all copies of the original message. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message, including any attachments, is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this communication is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy any and all copies of the original message. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36055] New: - HTTPS connection does not work without sslProtocol attribute
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36055. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36055 Summary: HTTPS connection does not work without sslProtocol attribute Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Connector:HTTP AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] With Tomcat 5.0 this worked: Connector port=443 scheme=https secure=true keystoreFile=MY_KEYSTORE_FILE keystorePass=MY_KEYSTORE_PASSWORD / In 5.5.9, it does not work (requests hang) unless I add: sslProtocol=TLS Debugging the code, it looks like the problem is that the secure flag does not get set in the Http11Protcol object unless sslProtocol is present because setting the secure flag calls the setter in Connector, not in Http11Protcol. I saw that the setter for sslProtocol in Http11Protocol calls setSecure(true) as do a few other setters. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36055] New: - HTTPS connection does not workwithout sslProtocol attribute
Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be submitted through our online email form. To locate our online email form, we ask that you visit our Help Desk at Customer Support at www.ballystore.com/helpdesk and choose FAQ/Contact Us under Online Store Information. Then, choose the subject that will address your question and send us an email through our online email form. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Sincerely, Customer Support at www.ballystore.com Original Message Follows: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36055. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36055 Summary: HTTPS connection does not work without sslProtocol attribute Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Connector:HTTP AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] With Tomcat 5.0 this worked: Connector port=443 scheme=https secure=true keystoreFile=MY_KEYSTORE_FILE keystorePass=MY_KEYSTORE_PASSWORD / In 5.5.9, it does not work (requests hang) unless I add: sslProtocol=TLS Debugging the code, it looks like the problem is that the secure flag does not get set in the Http11Protcol object unless sslProtocol is present because setting the secure flag calls the setter in Connector, not in Http11Protcol. I saw that the setter for sslProtocol in Http11Protocol calls setSecure(true) as do a few other setters. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message, including any attachments, is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this communication is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy any and all copies of the original message. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36055] New: - HTTPS connection does not workwithout sslProtocol attribute
Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be submitted through our online email form. To locate our online email form, we ask that you visit our Help Desk at Customer Support at www.ballystore.com/helpdesk and choose FAQ/Contact Us under Online Store Information. Then, choose the subject that will address your question and send us an email through our online email form. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Sincerely, Customer Support at www.ballystore.com Original Message Follows: Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be submitted through our online email form. To locate our online email form, we ask that you visit our Help Desk at Customer Support at www.ballystore.com/helpdesk and choose FAQ/Contact Us under Online Store Information. Then, choose the subject that will address your question and send us an email through our online email form. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Sincerely, Customer Support at www.ballystore.com Original Message Follows: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36055. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36055 Summary: HTTPS connection does not work without sslProtocol attribute Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Connector:HTTP AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] With Tomcat 5.0 this worked: Connector port=443 scheme=https secure=true keystoreFile=MY_KEYSTORE_FILE keystorePass=MY_KEYSTORE_PASSWORD / In 5.5.9, it does not work (requests hang) unless I add: sslProtocol=TLS Debugging the code, it looks like the problem is that the secure flag does not get set in the Http11Protcol object unless sslProtocol is present because setting the secure flag calls the setter in Connector, not in Http11Protcol. I saw that the setter for sslProtocol in Http11Protocol calls setSecure(true) as do a few other setters. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message, including any attachments, is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this communication is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy any and all copies of the original message. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message, including any attachments, is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this communication is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy any and all copies of the original message. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36055] New: - HTTPS connection does not workwithout sslProtocol attribute
Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be submitted through our online email form. To locate our online email form, we ask that you visit our Help Desk at Customer Support at www.ballystore.com/helpdesk and choose FAQ/Contact Us under Online Store Information. Then, choose the subject that will address your question and send us an email through our online email form. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Sincerely, Customer Support at www.ballystore.com Original Message Follows: Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be submitted through our online email form. To locate our online email form, we ask that you visit our Help Desk at Customer Support at www.ballystore.com/helpdesk and choose FAQ/Contact Us under Online Store Information. Then, choose the subject that will address your question and send us an email through our online email form. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Sincerely, Customer Support at www.ballystore.com Original Message Follows: Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be submitted through our online email form. To locate our online email form, we ask that you visit our Help Desk at Customer Support at www.ballystore.com/helpdesk and choose FAQ/Contact Us under Online Store Information. Then, choose the subject that will address your question and send us an email through our online email form. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Sincerely, Customer Support at www.ballystore.com Original Message Follows: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36055. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36055 Summary: HTTPS connection does not work without sslProtocol attribute Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Connector:HTTP AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] With Tomcat 5.0 this worked: Connector port=443 scheme=https secure=true keystoreFile=MY_KEYSTORE_FILE keystorePass=MY_KEYSTORE_PASSWORD / In 5.5.9, it does not work (requests hang) unless I add: sslProtocol=TLS Debugging the code, it looks like the problem is that the secure flag does not get set in the Http11Protcol object unless sslProtocol is present because setting the secure flag calls the setter in Connector, not in Http11Protcol. I saw that the setter for sslProtocol in Http11Protocol calls setSecure(true) as do a few other setters. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message, including any attachments, is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this communication is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy any and all copies of the original message. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message, including any attachments, is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this communication is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy any and all copies of the original message. Thank you
