Re:[VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

[Jonathan Pierce]

Since 4.0.2 is already released, shouldn't this be tagged 4.0.3b2 ?

Reply Separator
Subject:[VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
Author: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:   1/16/2002 3:10 PM

Hi,

I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with
the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:


[ ] +1 Make the release
[ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
[ ] -0 Bad idea
[ ] -1 No, because:





The release process will be the following:
- Tag j-t-c/webapp with "tomcat_402_b2"
- Update the Java sources for webapp in the main Tomcat tree to mirror the
changes; I plan to remove the duplication for the next release, and handle
webapp the same way as JK (or Coyote)
- Tag j-t-c/jk with "tomcat_402_b2" (it's fine to also tag it with something
else, I just think it's a better way to mark which version went in)
- Tag j-t-c/util with "tomcat_402_b2"
- Generate binaries for the Java code from the j-t-c components, and update
the binaries in the main Tomcat tree
- Tag the Tomcat tree with "tomcat_402_b2"
- Build and upload the main Tomcat binaries
- Build and upload the native binaries for JK and webapp
- Build and upload the RPMs

Note: IMO JK should be considered release quality in this release, and
should be enabled by default; of course, the final word on this goes to the
JK developers :)

Thanks,
Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 



This email and any files transmitted with it are for the named person's use
only.  It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged
information.  No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mistransmission.  If you receive this message in error, please immediately
delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies
of it and notify the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use,
disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you
are not the intended recipient.

This email message has been swept by a virus software product for the
presence of computer viruses.
*

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

[Bip Thelin]

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> [...]
> 
> [ ] +1 Make the release
> [X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
> [ ] -0 Bad idea
> [ ] -1 No, because:
> 



-bip



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

[Bill Barker]

> 
> [ ] +1 Make the release
> [X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
> [ ] -0 Bad idea
> [ ] -1 No, because:
> 
> 
> 
> 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

[Remy Maucherat]

> On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> > > +1 if the load balancing code gets in.
> > > -0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will
> > > not work in 4.0.2 ).
> >
> > I plan to port the jvmRoute patch. Is it enough ?
>
> Yes, you have my +1 than. ( it should be a trivial thing, I just want to
> make sure it gets in before the release )

Done.

There are dependencies of the new Java JK components for Tomcat 4 with some
Tomcat 3 components which are not yet in tomcat-util, like util.net and the
PoolTcpConnector. It's fine to use them, but they should be in j-t-c/util.
The build process shouldn't reference the utils which are from the TC 3 tree
anymore.

In the meantime, I removed the new stuff from the build to avoid possible
problems.

Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

[Larry Isaacs]

> 
> [ ] +1 Make the release
> [X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
> [ ] -0 Bad idea
> [ ] -1 No, because:
> 

Larry

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

[Faraj Meir]

+1
- Original Message -
From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:02 PM
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release


> >I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of
> >the week (with
> >the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:
> >
> >
> >[ ] +1 Make the release
> >[ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
> >[ ] -0 Bad idea
> >[ ] -1 No, because:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> +1 since you'll add the load-balancing stuff.
>
> PS: Since I'll have to works on RPM, could you send us early
> annoucement of source tarball availability to make me sure
> that everything works fine to avoid the problem I got with
> TC 4.0.1 with incorrect gif and empty htmls
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

[GOMEZ Henri]

>I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of 
>the week (with
>the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:
>
>
>[ ] +1 Make the release
>[ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
>[ ] -0 Bad idea
>[ ] -1 No, because:
>
>
>
>
>

+1 since you'll add the load-balancing stuff.

PS: Since I'll have to works on RPM, could you send us early
annoucement of source tarball availability to make me sure
that everything works fine to avoid the problem I got with
TC 4.0.1 with incorrect gif and empty htmls

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

[Bojan Smojver]

Remy Maucherat wrote:


> I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with
> the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:
> 
> 
> [ ] +1 Make the release
> [X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
> [ ] -0 Bad idea
> [ ] -1 No, because:

 > 

Bojan


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

[jean-frederic clere]

Remy Maucherat wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with
> the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:
> 
> 
> [X] +1 Make the release
> [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
> [ ] -0 Bad idea
> [ ] -1 No, because:
> 
> 
> 
> The release process will be the following:
> - Tag j-t-c/webapp with "tomcat_402_b2"
> - Update the Java sources for webapp in the main Tomcat tree to mirror the
> changes; I plan to remove the duplication for the next release, and handle
> webapp the same way as JK (or Coyote)

Why not doing it now? - I have only fixed things in j-t-c - 
I will port back the _change_ in TC to j-t-c.

> - Tag j-t-c/jk with "tomcat_402_b2" (it's fine to also tag it with something
> else, I just think it's a better way to mark which version went in)
> - Tag j-t-c/util with "tomcat_402_b2"
> - Generate binaries for the Java code from the j-t-c components, and update
> the binaries in the main Tomcat tree
> - Tag the Tomcat tree with "tomcat_402_b2"
> - Build and upload the main Tomcat binaries
> - Build and upload the native binaries for JK and webapp
> - Build and upload the RPMs
> 
> Note: IMO JK should be considered release quality in this release, and
> should be enabled by default; of course, the final word on this goes to the
> JK developers :)
> 
> Thanks,
> Remy
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> For additional commands, e-mail: 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

[costinm]

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:

> > +1 if the load balancing code gets in.
> > -0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will
> > not work in 4.0.2 ).
>
> I plan to port the jvmRoute patch. Is it enough ?

Yes, you have my +1 than. ( it should be a trivial thing, I just want to
make sure it gets in before the release )

Thanks,
Costin


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

[Remy Maucherat]

> +1 if the load balancing code gets in.
> -0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will
> not work in 4.0.2 ).

I plan to port the jvmRoute patch. Is it enough ?

Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

[costinm]

+1 if the load balancing code gets in.
-0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will
not work in 4.0.2 ).

Costin


> The release process will be the following:
> - Tag j-t-c/webapp with "tomcat_402_b2"
> - Update the Java sources for webapp in the main Tomcat tree to mirror the
> changes; I plan to remove the duplication for the next release, and handle
> webapp the same way as JK (or Coyote)
> - Tag j-t-c/jk with "tomcat_402_b2" (it's fine to also tag it with something
> else, I just think it's a better way to mark which version went in)
> - Tag j-t-c/util with "tomcat_402_b2"
> - Generate binaries for the Java code from the j-t-c components, and update
> the binaries in the main Tomcat tree
> - Tag the Tomcat tree with "tomcat_402_b2"
> - Build and upload the main Tomcat binaries
> - Build and upload the native binaries for JK and webapp
> - Build and upload the RPMs
>
> Note: IMO JK should be considered release quality in this release, and
> should be enabled by default; of course, the final word on this goes to the
> JK developers :)
>
> Thanks,
> Remy
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

[Amy Roh]

>
> [X] +1 Make the release
> [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
> [ ] -0 Bad idea
> [ ] -1 No, because:

Amy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

[Cavan Morris]

Is there a plan to build native webapp for Apache 2.0 as well as 1.3?

> 
> 
> [ ] +1 Make the release
> [X ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
> [ ] -0 Bad idea
> [ ] -1 No, because:
> 
> 
> 
> 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

[Kevin Seguin]

> 
> 
> [X] +1 Make the release
> [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
> [ ] -0 Bad idea
> [ ] -1 No, because:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

[Andy Armstrong]

Remy Maucherat wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with
> the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:
> 
> 
> [X] +1 Make the release
> [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
> [ ] -0 Bad idea
> [ ] -1 No, because:
> 
> 
> 
> The release process will be the following:
> - Tag j-t-c/webapp with "tomcat_402_b2"
> - Update the Java sources for webapp in the main Tomcat tree to mirror the
> changes; I plan to remove the duplication for the next release, and handle
> webapp the same way as JK (or Coyote)
> - Tag j-t-c/jk with "tomcat_402_b2" (it's fine to also tag it with something
> else, I just think it's a better way to mark which version went in)
> - Tag j-t-c/util with "tomcat_402_b2"
> - Generate binaries for the Java code from the j-t-c components, and update
> the binaries in the main Tomcat tree
> - Tag the Tomcat tree with "tomcat_402_b2"
> - Build and upload the main Tomcat binaries
> - Build and upload the native binaries for JK and webapp
> - Build and upload the RPMs
> 
> Note: IMO JK should be considered release quality in this release, and
> should be enabled by default; of course, the final word on this goes to the
> JK developers :)
> 
> Thanks,
> Remy
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> For additional commands, e-mail: 

-- 
Andy Armstrong, Tagish

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

[Craig R. McClanahan]

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:

>
> 
> [X] +1 Make the release
> [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
> [ ] -0 Bad idea
> [ ] -1 No, because:
> 
>

Craig


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: