Can AccessLogValve Cause Tomcat Performance Hit?
Hello, We are seeing a performance hit to our server whenever we turn on AccessLogValve for a virtual host in tomcat. Is this common or has anyone else experienced this? Any suggestions on how to configure for optimal performance? Below is the virtual host entry in server.xml - tomcat is running stand alone on a Red Hat 9 Linux box - the box is dedicated to running tomcat - there are two virtual hosts configured for the server, and only one has any real traffic. Host name=www.mysite.net debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false !-- Aliaswww.mysite.net/Alias -- Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=mysite.net. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ Valve className=org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve directory=logs/mysite.net-acesslogs pattern=%t %a %A %h %m %p %U prefix=access_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=mysite.net/production debug=0/ /Host Thanks in advance! Dan Barron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multiple Paths in one Context
Hi, I would like one webapp to serve multiple paths so www.mywebapp.com/fred and www.mywebapp.com/fred2 go to the same webapp, I can do this with two contexts I know, however I don't want the webapp to load twice... Is it possible to do: Context path=/fred;/fred2 docBase=myFredApp debug=5 reloadable=true crossContext=true / Or is it something else? Mvh Benjamin A. Janes Maersk Data Sverige M. +46 (0)40-630 04 88 Drottninggatan 18, S-211 49 Malmö, Sweden - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Issues in tomcat 5.0.19
Carl Olivier wrote, On 4/6/2004 10:30 AM: Could the problem be that too many high processor-requirement threads are being started, and as such each gets less time on the processor - thus taking longer to process..and thus, should we not set the AJP worker maxThreads DOWN thus allowing the processor to finish each processor intensive task quicker? Maybe set the acceptCount up.hmmm - thoughts? I think you've found the problem. If you have a page which takes 10s to process (and you say that it's CPU bound, not IO bound), once you have as many threads running as you have CPUs on your server, that 10s is goint to start taking a longer. You said your server was a single CPU machine, so if you're running 2 concurrent threads, now it will take 20s per request to process. There isn't much you can do. You need to limit the number of concurrent requests so that at maximum load, your slow page takes a reasonable time to complete. Once you hit that limit you either need to start queueing requests or rejecting them. If you don't, the server will just bog further and further down. Once you get more than 10 or so CPU hogging threads going at a time, performance will really start to degrade and requests will take longer than 10x to complete than usual due to context switching overhead. You can limit the number of concurrent requests at the connector level and then you might want increase the accept count as you suggested. The next thing you'll want to do is figure out how to turn those 10s page requests into 1s or less. ;-) -Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
setting codebase for rmi in servlet running in tomcat does not work
dear all, over the last days i have tried to set up an rmi server in a cocoon servlet running in tomcat (4.1.27, started via maven goal appserver:start); all i want/need to do starting my rmi server is: (1) start the rmiregistry (via LocateRegistry.createRegistry(regPort); //therefore the classpath should be unset (2) set the java.rmi.server.codebase property to the specific webaccessible tomcat folder where my class files reside (3) create a (remote) object and bind it under a specific servicename to the registry (2) seems to work (if i use System.getProperty(java.rmi.server.codebase) the right value is displayed), BUT it does NOT - when a rmiClient tries to get the remote object a ClassNotFoundException is thrown (due to not finding the stub class of the remote object, which results from the obviously wrong codebase property) if i run the same code ((1)-(3)) outside the cocoon servlet (running in tomcat) everything works fine (although i use the same running tomcat for dynamically downloading the stub files) ! WHAT am i doing wrong ??? does anybody know if properties can not be set if tomcat is running or if im running a cocoon servlet (running in tomcat) ??? i would greatly appreciate your help thanks markus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Issues in tomcat 5.0.19
Hi David. Ok, well I am trying our stress testing out with a LOWER maxThread count and a higher acceptCount. Nice to have some confirmation about the theory! Thanks for your feedback. Yes - those 10 second pages need to be optimised - the problem is that those pages are dependant upon data retrieval - with the AMOUNT of data being variable. Also the implementation of our tag library by a web developer could be done in a number of different ways - so we will need to get the subroutines optimised as much as possible! Anyway - thanks for your reply - appreciated. Regards, Carl -Original Message- From: David Rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 April 2004 08:59 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Issues in tomcat 5.0.19 Carl Olivier wrote, On 4/6/2004 10:30 AM: Could the problem be that too many high processor-requirement threads are being started, and as such each gets less time on the processor - thus taking longer to process..and thus, should we not set the AJP worker maxThreads DOWN thus allowing the processor to finish each processor intensive task quicker? Maybe set the acceptCount up.hmmm - thoughts? I think you've found the problem. If you have a page which takes 10s to process (and you say that it's CPU bound, not IO bound), once you have as many threads running as you have CPUs on your server, that 10s is goint to start taking a longer. You said your server was a single CPU machine, so if you're running 2 concurrent threads, now it will take 20s per request to process. There isn't much you can do. You need to limit the number of concurrent requests so that at maximum load, your slow page takes a reasonable time to complete. Once you hit that limit you either need to start queueing requests or rejecting them. If you don't, the server will just bog further and further down. Once you get more than 10 or so CPU hogging threads going at a time, performance will really start to degrade and requests will take longer than 10x to complete than usual due to context switching overhead. You can limit the number of concurrent requests at the connector level and then you might want increase the accept count as you suggested. The next thing you'll want to do is figure out how to turn those 10s page requests into 1s or less. ;-) -Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[NON DELIVERY NOTIFICATION]
Din motive de securitate, serverul de mail nu permite decat attachment-uri de tip .txt, .doc, .pdf, .xls, .ppt. VA RUGAM ARHIVATI ORICE ALT TIP DE ATTACHMENT ! (Puteti folosi orice program de arhivare : rar, zip, ace, etc) For security reasons our mail server allows only attached files with The following extensions : .txt, .doc, .pdf, .xls, .ppt. PLEASE DO ARCHIVE ALL THE OTHER ATTACHED FILES ! Original message was replaced by this one by the following reason : *** A suspicious file (executable code) was found in the message ! Original message had the following attached files : (X-FILE ??? ) : message.scr TYPE : audio/x-wav SUSPECT FILES : 1 Original message was sent by From : [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you think this is an error and the message should not be rejected by the filtering system, you may contact you system administrator for instructions. If you have any questions, you can contact us : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sincerely, [EMAIL PROTECTED] j-chkmail - (c) Ecole des Mines de Paris 2002 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
secure installation
Hi all, I'm about to install Tomcat under RH9 and I'm not sure about the best path installation and way to start, as regards the security. It is advisable create a new user tomcat and install in /home/tomcat? And about the way to start automatically? A simple script in init.d directory could work well? Thanks Gianni - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: JK2 connector built and installed but is there something wrong?
Hi, This is a minimalistic workers2.properties. Remember to change to your ip address. It works for me on SuSE. Kevan # comment these lines out in production [logger.apache2] level=DEBUG [shm] file=/usr/local/apache2/logs/shm.file size=1048576 # Example socket channel, override port and host. [channel.socket:localhost:8009] port=8009 host=127.0.0.1 # define the worker [ajp13:localhost:8009] channel=channel.socket:localhost:8009 # Uri mapping # Add your ip address instead of [uri:/*.jsp] worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 # Define the communication channel [channel.socket:localhost:8009] info=Ajp13 forwarding over socket tomcatId=localhost:8009 host=127.0.0.1 #This maps to a context test # in the webapps folder [uri:/test/*] worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 info=Map the test system -Original Message- From: Kevin Struckhoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 April 2004 00:22 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JK2 connector built and installed but is there something wrong? After downloading the source and building it, I finally have mod_jk2 at least loaded into Apache Web Server 2.0.48. However, in the docs, it says to add these 2 directives to workers2.properties: [uri:/examples/*] worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 When I send the browser to http://localhost/examples/, I get a -404 error (not found). What am I missing? Apache starts up just fine. TIA. = Thanks. Kevin -- Enjoy Life, Drink and Code Java! __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: providing .png images - CGIServlet
No one has come across problems similar to this? My brain is starting to hurt. On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Alex wrote: Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 10:39:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: providing .png images - CGIServlet [system info] 2 Windows 2000 IIS 5.0 sitting under alteon load balancers providing sticky sessions 2 Tomcat 5.0.19 application servers connected to the above noted iis servers using the older jk2 isapi dll. -- tomcat application servers are using the pooled replication The entire application that is running is working perfectly. No problems with exception to providing .png images from a freely available cgi on the net called '14all.cgi' -- I've set the debug level to 99 for the org.apache.catalina.servlets.CGIServlet I watch the output in localhost_log---.txt and see the .png being created and everything happening proper. headers are set, etc. in the browser, nothing is being displayed. in the non clustered application server setup, this all works properly. anyone have any ideas? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JK2 connector built and installed but is there something wrong?
kwilding wrote: Hi, This is a minimalistic workers2.properties. Remember to change to your ip address. It works for me on SuSE. Kevan # comment these lines out in production [logger.apache2] level=DEBUG [shm] file=/usr/local/apache2/logs/shm.file size=1048576 Is this neccessary? # Example socket channel, override port and host. [channel.socket:localhost:8009] port=8009 host=127.0.0.1 # define the worker [ajp13:localhost:8009] channel=channel.socket:localhost:8009 # Uri mapping # Add your ip address instead of [uri:/*.jsp] worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 # Define the communication channel [channel.socket:localhost:8009] info=Ajp13 forwarding over socket tomcatId=localhost:8009 host=127.0.0.1 Why the double definition of comm socket? Or is it appended together? Anyway, it should be in one section, IMHO. #This maps to a context test # in the webapps folder [uri:/test/*] worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 info=Map the test system - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, it's me
Norton AntiVirus eliminato1.txt Description: plain/text - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where to set JAVA_OPTS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Hi, Where do I need to set JAVA_OPTS (Should I edit catalina.bat file?). I am using Win 2k Pro and Tomcat 5. Thank you, Best Regards, Uma Hi usually i put my JAVA_OPTS in catalina.sh (in windows is catalina.bat) like this REM set JAVA_OPTS=-server -Xms128m -Xmx128m -verbose:gc -Xrunhprof:cpu=times,depth=6,thread=y,file=C:\log.txt set JAVA_OPTS=-server -Xms64m -Xmx64m echo Using CATALINA_BASE: %CATALINA_BASE% echo Using CATALINA_HOME: %CATALINA_HOME% echo Using CATALINA_TMPDIR: %CATALINA_TMPDIR% echo Using JAVA_HOME: %JAVA_HOME% echo using JAVA_OPTS: %JAVA_OPTS% it is used later in lines like %_EXECJAVA% %JAVA_OPTS% %CATALINA_OPTS% Hope i helped u bye Giorgio -- --- Giorgio Ponza Web Developer Opla.com Ltd Tel. +39 011 7506233 Fax. +39 011 746179 http://www.opla.it --- Ci sono persone che hanno soldi e persone che sono ricche (Coco Chanel) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk leaks file handles on apache graceful restart?
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 01:41, David Rees wrote: Run strings on your binary and grep for 1.2 `strings mod_jk.so | grep 1.2`. The other way is to look at the output of mod_status (commonly accessible at http://example.com/server-status) not forgetting to modify apache.conf (or httpd.conf depending) and enable server-status and server-info functions, and put your IP address into the allow. Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bad Class Version while compiling JSP Files on Tomcat
I have j2sdk1.4.2. Exact version information as follows.
java version 1.4.2
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2-b28)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2-b28, mixed mode)
On Tomcat 4.0-b7, Tomcat 5.0.7 Tomcat 5.0.19 JSP pages couldn't
compile while servlets works fine. Iknow by shifting to jdk1.3.1 this
problem will solve. But I can not do that. Tomcat 5.0.19 is the latest
release build.
Is the same problem everywhere?
To get rid of this should I download whole source code other huge
libraries compile it for j2sdk1.4.2.
Or downloading jikes will solve problem?
Error :
J:\Java\Downloads\Tomcat\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.19\work\Catalina\localhost\OnlineExam\org\apache\jsp\AvailableContext_jsp.java:8:
cannot access java.lang.Object
bad class file: D:\j2sdk1.4.2\jre\lib\rt.jar(java/lang/Object.class)
class file has wrong version 48.0, should be 47.0
Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of the
classpath.
implements org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspSourceDependent {
^
1 error
./Nikhil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat configuration
Hello Syed Taj
yeah thats what even i thought, but my web pages are not visible if i put
myappl directory directly under webapps, only if i put it under ROOT doed
the server even display the web pages.
You are mistaken.
Placing your 'myapp' directory under the ROOT context simply means that your
web pages are *nested* in a ROOT context sub-directory.
In other words your web pages are assumed to belong to the ROOT context, and
your 'myapp' folder is treated as a sub-directory and *not* as a separate
context.
By the way, in servlet containers such as Tomcat the word 'context' is
synonymous with the word 'application'. (They mean the same thing.)
If you want to create your *own* separate application (context) then you
must place it under the $CATALINA_HOME/webapps directory - not under ROOT.
One thing you must *not* do is have a ROOT sub-directory that is the same
name as a directory (folder) that represents a context (application) in the
'webapps' directory.
So if your application (context) is called 'banana' then you must not have
this:
$CATALINA_HOME/
|
webapps/
|
ROOT/
| |
| banana/
|
banana/
You should delete the $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/ROOT/banana sub-directory.
Odd as it may seem, you could place a web page called (say) 'yellow.jsp'
under either of the two 'banana' directories shown above and you would call
that page with the same (!) URL:
http://localhost:8080/banana/yellow.jsp
If the 'yellow.jsp' sits under the $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/ROOT/banana
directory then it is treated as belonging to the ROOT context (application).
If 'yellow.jsp' sits under the $CATALINA_HOME/banana directory then it is
treated as belonging to the 'banana' context (application).
The difference is important!
Finally, you say that 'my web pages are not visible if i put myappl
directory directly under webapps'.
All I can suggest is that you are doing something wrong, because this aspect
of Tomcat is rock-solid and works 100%.
So try again, and make sure you do not have a ROOT sub-directory that
conflicts with the name of your 'myapp' context, whatever that is.
If you are still having problems, start a new thread on this forum, giving
all the relevant details, and I'm sure you will be helped.
I'm off on holiday now, so I cannot follow up on this I'm afraid.
Good luck!
Harry
From: Harry Mantheakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat configuration
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 20:08:19 +0100
Hello
ROOT is the default context (application). By default, ROOT handles
requests
that do not specify an application. Hence this URL:
http://localhost:8080/
Would be handled by the 'ROOT' application, which displays the Tomcat
welcome page. You can re-configure this, of course, but that is how it is
set up by default.
Your 'myapplication' directory (and everything it contains) should not be
located within the ROOT directory. It should be located within the
'webapps'
directory.
HTH
Harry
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: UTF-8 encoding
Hello Nikki Just send UTF8 encoded data and everything will be allright. Yes, that seems to work for me at the moment, though I am relying on default settings because I do not even specify UTF-8. (Java defaults to Unicode anyway.) I'm only using LATIN-1 characters at the moment, so I cannot comment on what would happen if I was working with (say) Chinese characters. I have to leave it at that because this is something I shall be looking into later. All the best! Harry Simply I don't get it. You send data over HTTP. You can send data as you wish. What about servlet serving images? Just send UTF8 encoded data and everything will be allright. No way Tomcat knows do you want to send cyrrilic letter or french accent letter. It's up to you. Niki Harry Mantheakis wrote: - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can AccessLogValve Cause Tomcat Performance Hit?
Yes I can believe there is a performance hit. The valve reparses the string on every request. Since the Valve also uses a SimpleDateFormtatter - I think it is also restricted by the sync block imposed by that class. -Tim Dan Barron wrote: Hello, We are seeing a performance hit to our server whenever we turn on AccessLogValve for a virtual host in tomcat. Is this common or has anyone else experienced this? Any suggestions on how to configure for optimal performance? Below is the virtual host entry in server.xml - tomcat is running stand alone on a Red Hat 9 Linux box - the box is dedicated to running tomcat - there are two virtual hosts configured for the server, and only one has any real traffic. Host name=www.mysite.net debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false !-- Aliaswww.mysite.net/Alias -- Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=mysite.net. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ Valve className=org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve directory=logs/mysite.net-acesslogs pattern=%t %a %A %h %m %p %U prefix=access_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=mysite.net/production debug=0/ /Host - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with configuing Tomcat
I am trying to get Tomcat talking to JBoss through JNDI How do I do this? I have looked at the server config and the web.xml files all to no luck, In the old config (openejb) there is a definition configured on the Tomcat for a factory declaring parameter namefactory/name valueorg.openejb.client.TomcatEjbFactory/value /parameter parameter nameopenejb.naming.factory.initial/name valueorg.jnp.interfaces.RemoteInitialContextFactory/value /parameter is there a similar one for JBoss? What else do I need to change to get it working with JBOss? (I have to use Tomcat 5 rather than the emnbedded tomcat with JBoss as the embedded version doesnt support SSL properly and crashes.) Mike. -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM d- s:+ a C UL P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o+ K w O-- M- V- PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP t+++ 5+++ X- R+++ tv++ h++ DI D++ G e+ h++ r+++ y+++ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.643 / Virus Database: 411 - Release Date: 25/03/2004 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: Re: Your document
Here is the file. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with configuing Tomcat
Hi Mike, I'm not familiar with openejb but I assume that you are talking about fetching the initial context for JBoss? Try this in your code: Hashtable env = new java.util.Hashtable(); env.put(java.naming.factory.initial, org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContextFactory); env.put(java.naming.factory.url.pkgs, org.jboss.naming;); env.put(java.naming.provider.url, jnp://localhost:1099); InitialContext ic = new InitialContext(env); Object ref = ic.lookup(ejb/HelloWorld); Adam On 04/07/2004 01:28 PM Michael Forster wrote: I am trying to get Tomcat talking to JBoss through JNDI How do I do this? I have looked at the server config and the web.xml files all to no luck, In the old config (openejb) there is a definition configured on the Tomcat for a factory declaring parameter namefactory/name valueorg.openejb.client.TomcatEjbFactory/value /parameter parameter nameopenejb.naming.factory.initial/name valueorg.jnp.interfaces.RemoteInitialContextFactory/value /parameter is there a similar one for JBoss? What else do I need to change to get it working with JBOss? (I have to use Tomcat 5 rather than the emnbedded tomcat with JBoss as the embedded version doesnt support SSL properly and crashes.) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: secure installation
Gianni, From my experience: User tomcat is created for you. Place it in whatever directory makes sense to you.(Keep it simple) Keep the permissions on the tomcat directories tight. Make them only readable by tomcat etc. If you need port 80 and 443 start tomcat as a daemon. For details: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/setup.html If not, you can use the startup.sh script in the /bin directory. For details: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/introduction.html If you are going to connect to Apache then build Apache yourself or at minimum add the development rpm, as you will need some components of it (APR) to build the jk2 connector (not included in the standard Apache install on RedHat). Advice: read about connector first, then do installs. For details: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/index.html Have fun! Doug www.parsonstechnical.com - Original Message - From: Gianni Pucciani [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 3:43 AM Subject: secure installation Hi all, I'm about to install Tomcat under RH9 and I'm not sure about the best path installation and way to start, as regards the security. It is advisable create a new user tomcat and install in /home/tomcat? And about the way to start automatically? A simple script in init.d directory could work well? Thanks Gianni - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can AccessLogValve Cause Tomcat Performance Hit?
Tim Funk wrote: Yes I can believe there is a performance hit. The valve reparses the string on every request. Since the Valve also uses a SimpleDateFormtatter - I think it is also restricted by the sync block imposed by that class. Another thing: If you enabled host lookup on the connector, it can also cause big problems with the access log. -- x Rémy Maucherat Developer Consultant JBoss Group (Europe) SàRL x - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: JK2 connector built and installed but is there something wron g?
try doing this [uri:/jsp-examples/*] worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 There is no examples structure. You can also try servlets-examples. Drew -Original Message- From: Kevin Struckhoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 7:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JK2 connector built and installed but is there something wrong? After downloading the source and building it, I finally have mod_jk2 at least loaded into Apache Web Server 2.0.48. However, in the docs, it says to add these 2 directives to workers2.properties: [uri:/examples/*] worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 When I send the browser to http://localhost/examples/, I get a -404 error (not found). What am I missing? Apache starts up just fine. TIA. = Thanks. Kevin -- Enjoy Life, Drink and Code Java! __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bad Class Version while compiling JSP Files on Tomcat
Hi.
Sounds to me like your jar files are compiled under different JDKs. Be
sure when you install j2sdk1.4.2 to completely replace all files in the
JDK directory. I'd actually go so far as to clean install in a separate
directory (ie /usr/java/j2sdk1.4.2_04) and then symlink j2sdk to it.
Set JAVA_HOME to j2sdk and it'll find the jdk. Also be sure all your
webapp files are compiled under the 1.4.2 JDK.
--David
JavaNetIn wrote:
I have j2sdk1.4.2. Exact version information as follows.
java version 1.4.2
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2-b28)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2-b28, mixed mode)
On Tomcat 4.0-b7, Tomcat 5.0.7 Tomcat 5.0.19 JSP pages couldn't
compile while servlets works fine. Iknow by shifting to jdk1.3.1 this
problem will solve. But I can not do that. Tomcat 5.0.19 is the latest
release build.
Is the same problem everywhere?
To get rid of this should I download whole source code other huge
libraries compile it for j2sdk1.4.2.
Or downloading jikes will solve problem?
Error :
J:\Java\Downloads\Tomcat\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.19\work\Catalina\localhost\OnlineExam\org\apache\jsp\AvailableContext_jsp.java:8:
cannot access java.lang.Object
bad class file: D:\j2sdk1.4.2\jre\lib\rt.jar(java/lang/Object.class)
class file has wrong version 48.0, should be 47.0
Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of the
classpath.
implements org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspSourceDependent {
^
1 error
./Nikhil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
measure memory
Hi people. I need measure the memory use for my application in the tomcat 4.1.12. Some body know how do. Thanks and sorry mi inglish Saludos !! SALVATIERRA, Mauricio Hugo Information Technology Ford Argentina S.C.A. Phono/Fax: 54-11-4756-8750 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit our page: http//www.ford.com.ar/ STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are strictly confidential and property of Ford Argentina S.C.A. They may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word Misdirected as the message and delete the present message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: JK2 connector built and installed but is there something wrong?
Hi, I had a similar problem. The line for the uri has to have a directory that is under $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps. [uri:/jsp-examples/*] would require the directory $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/jsp-examples. As Drew said you can try servlets-examples instead of jsp-examples. Those directories are under the webapps folder by default. Mark -Original Message- From: Hamilton, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:28 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: JK2 connector built and installed but is there something wrong? try doing this [uri:/jsp-examples/*] worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 There is no examples structure. You can also try servlets-examples. Drew -Original Message- From: Kevin Struckhoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 7:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JK2 connector built and installed but is there something wrong? After downloading the source and building it, I finally have mod_jk2 at least loaded into Apache Web Server 2.0.48. However, in the docs, it says to add these 2 directives to workers2.properties: [uri:/examples/*] worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 When I send the browser to http://localhost/examples/, I get a -404 error (not found). What am I missing? Apache starts up just fine. TIA. = Thanks. Kevin -- Enjoy Life, Drink and Code Java! __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: secure installation
Parsons Technical Services wrote: Gianni, From my experience: User tomcat is created for you. Place it in whatever directory makes sense to you.(Keep it simple) Keep the permissions on the tomcat directories tight. Make them only readable by tomcat etc. Ok, thanks! Gianni - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
measure memory
Hi people. I need measure the memory use for my application in the tomcat 4.1.12. Some body know how do. Thanks and sorry mi inglish Saludos !! SALVATIERRA, Mauricio Hugo Information Technology Ford Argentina S.C.A. Phono/Fax: 54-11-4756-8750 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit our page: http//www.ford.com.ar/ STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are strictly confidential and property of Ford Argentina S.C.A. They may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word Misdirected as the message and delete the present message. -Original Message- From: Mark Nye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 09:53 To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: JK2 connector built and installed but is there something wrong? Hi, I had a similar problem. The line for the uri has to have a directory that is under $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps. [uri:/jsp-examples/*] would require the directory $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/jsp-examples. As Drew said you can try servlets-examples instead of jsp-examples. Those directories are under the webapps folder by default. Mark -Original Message- From: Hamilton, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:28 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: JK2 connector built and installed but is there something wrong? try doing this [uri:/jsp-examples/*] worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 There is no examples structure. You can also try servlets-examples. Drew -Original Message- From: Kevin Struckhoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 7:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JK2 connector built and installed but is there something wrong? After downloading the source and building it, I finally have mod_jk2 at least loaded into Apache Web Server 2.0.48. However, in the docs, it says to add these 2 directives to workers2.properties: [uri:/examples/*] worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 When I send the browser to http://localhost/examples/, I get a -404 error (not found). What am I missing? Apache starts up just fine. TIA. = Thanks. Kevin -- Enjoy Life, Drink and Code Java! __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: measure memory
Try: Runtime runtime = Runtime.getRuntime(); long totalMemory = runtime.totalMemory(); long freeMemory = runtime.freeMemory(); Also Thread counting: ThreadGroup group = Thread.currentThread().getThreadGroup(); while (group.getParent() != null) group = group.getParent(); int activeCount = group.activeCount(); Regards, Carl -Original Message- From: Salvatierra, Mauricio h (M.H.) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 April 2004 02:58 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: measure memory Hi people. I need measure the memory use for my application in the tomcat 4.1.12. Some body know how do. Thanks and sorry mi inglish Saludos !! SALVATIERRA, Mauricio Hugo Information Technology Ford Argentina S.C.A. Phono/Fax: 54-11-4756-8750 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit our page: http//www.ford.com.ar/ STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are strictly confidential and property of Ford Argentina S.C.A. They may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word Misdirected as the message and delete the present message. -Original Message- From: Mark Nye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 09:53 To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: JK2 connector built and installed but is there something wrong? Hi, I had a similar problem. The line for the uri has to have a directory that is under $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps. [uri:/jsp-examples/*] would require the directory $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/jsp-examples. As Drew said you can try servlets-examples instead of jsp-examples. Those directories are under the webapps folder by default. Mark -Original Message- From: Hamilton, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:28 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: JK2 connector built and installed but is there something wrong? try doing this [uri:/jsp-examples/*] worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 There is no examples structure. You can also try servlets-examples. Drew -Original Message- From: Kevin Struckhoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 7:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JK2 connector built and installed but is there something wrong? After downloading the source and building it, I finally have mod_jk2 at least loaded into Apache Web Server 2.0.48. However, in the docs, it says to add these 2 directives to workers2.properties: [uri:/examples/*] worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 When I send the browser to http://localhost/examples/, I get a -404 error (not found). What am I missing? Apache starts up just fine. TIA. = Thanks. Kevin -- Enjoy Life, Drink and Code Java! __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can AccessLogValve Cause Tomcat Performance Hit?
Hi, How can you expect the addition of ANY component to the processing pipeline NOT to cause a performance hit? Of course AccessLogValve adds something, nothing comes for free. You can control the hit by modifying what you're logging and disabling DNS lookups, as others have suggested. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Dan Barron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:09 AM To: Tomcat Users List Cc: Dan Anderson Subject: Can AccessLogValve Cause Tomcat Performance Hit? Hello, We are seeing a performance hit to our server whenever we turn on AccessLogValve for a virtual host in tomcat. Is this common or has anyone else experienced this? Any suggestions on how to configure for optimal performance? Below is the virtual host entry in server.xml - tomcat is running stand alone on a Red Hat 9 Linux box - the box is dedicated to running tomcat - there are two virtual hosts configured for the server, and only one has any real traffic. Host name=www.mysite.net debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false !-- Aliaswww.mysite.net/Alias -- Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=mysite.net. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ Valve className=org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve directory=logs/mysite.net-acesslogs pattern=%t %a %A %h %m %p %U prefix=access_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=mysite.net/production debug=0/ /Host Thanks in advance! Dan Barron [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is there a tomcat weblog anywhere?
Hi, We have that in the wiki. A blog would add nothing IMHO, and since it has a nonzero maintenance cost, why do it? Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 2:40 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Is there a tomcat weblog anywhere? A tomcat blog would contain a more compact kind of data, as links to any tomcat article, news about tomcat, tips about configuration (an unified jk/jk2 how-to would be great!!), and whatever kind of information that would be useful to all tomcat users. LILES, DAVID (CONTRACTOR) wrote: How would a blog be any different then this forum? I'm not very familiar with blogs, but from what I've read, they appear to be basically a message board -Original Message- From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 12:46 PM To: Tomcat Users List; tomcatuser Subject: Re: Is there a tomcat weblog anywhere? some of the tomcat developers have blogs, but they don't necessarily talk about tomcat in their blogs. some do. there is not unified tomcat blog site, unless you are proposing to create one and let everyone use it :) peter tomcatuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am talking about a weblog about tomcat. ---Original Message--- From: Emerson Cargnin Subject: Re: Is there a tomcat weblog anywhere? Sent: 06 Apr 2004 16:05:48 you can try a countless of them, i can suggest you personalblog, the one I develop and use: www.sf.net/projects/personalblog http://echofloripa.sytes.net/ Or you mean a weblog about tomcat? :) Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, Why would we have one? Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: tomcatuser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 11:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Is there a tomcat weblog anywhere? I was wondering if there is any official tomcat weblogs on the net. I have searched and found some peoples individual weblogs, but was wondering if there is a more official site. This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Emerson Cargnin Analista de Sistemas Setor de Desenvolvimento de Sistemas - TRE-SC tel : (048) - 251-3700 - Ramal 3181 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---Original Message--- - Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway - Enter today - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Emerson Cargnin Analista de Sistemas Setor de Desenvolvimento de Sistemas - TRE-SC tel : (048) - 251-3700 - Ramal 3181 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
Hi, I need to setup a tomcat environmet manually, I run Redhat 7.3 and I want toinstall from scratch not using the rpm's but use the src's build them and install. How do I do that? Any suggestions will be very welcome :-) Thanks in advance Wernert http://www.de-rommelmarkt.nl http://www.de-rommelmarkt.nl/
RE: measure memory
Hi, Don't apologize for your English ;) Use java.lang.Runtime#freeMemory/maxMemory/totalMemory methods. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Salvatierra, Mauricio h (M.H.) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:47 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: measure memory Hi people. I need measure the memory use for my application in the tomcat 4.1.12. Some body know how do. Thanks and sorry mi inglish Saludos !! SALVATIERRA, Mauricio Hugo Information Technology Ford Argentina S.C.A. Phono/Fax: 54-11-4756-8750 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit our page: http//www.ford.com.ar/ *** * STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are strictly confidential and property of Ford Argentina S.C.A. They may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word Misdirected as the message and delete the present message. *** * - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multiple Paths in one Context
Hi, Is it possible to do: Context path=/fred;/fred2 docBase=myFredApp debug=5 reloadable=true crossContext=true / No. You will need to have one of the contexts simply forward to another, via methods explained many times on this list including yesterday. Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bad Gateway
Norton AntiVirus eliminato1.txt Description: plain/text - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
build from scratch - was Re: Hi
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 14:04, werner S. Teunissen wrote: Hi, I need to setup a tomcat environmet manually, I run Redhat 7.3 and I want toinstall from scratch not using the rpm's but use the src's build them and install. How do I do that? there were recent postings on this list only yesterday top tip: make the subject of emails relevant to the topic next top tip: check the archives before asking the same old question - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bad Class Version while compiling JSP Files on Tomcat
From: JavaNetIn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bad Class Version while compiling JSP Files on Tomcat bad class file: D:\j2sdk1.4.2\jre\lib\rt.jar(java/lang/Object.class) class file has wrong version 48.0, should be 47.0 This error message is one generated by the javac compiler, and usually indicates that you have an old version of tools.jar in the classpath used in starting Tomcat. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat Configuration: help sun.misc.ServiceConfigurationError
Good Morning I have an application allowing the export of a canvas as a image png file. The application can run in standalone mode or as an applet. In standalone mode: export drawing as a png file works fine. In applet mode (application server tomcat 5.0.18, java 1.4.1) When I try to use the applet feature export drawing as a png file: it failed In the Tomcat log: I noticed the following line written when I tried to use to export image applet feature : 199.99.99.9 - - [06/Apr/2004:13:50:38 +0100] HEAD /webApplication/META-INF/services/javax.imageio.spi.ImageTranscoderSpi HTTP/1.1 302 - I have in the java console the following message: sun.misc.ServiceConfigurationError javax.imageio.spi.ImageInputStreamSpi: http://localhost:8080/webApplication/META-INF/services/javax.imageio.spi.ImageInputStreamSpi:4: Illegal configuration-file syntax at sun.misc.Service.fail(Service.java:129) at sun.misc.Service.fail(Service.java:135) at sun.misc.Service.parseLine(Service.java:157) at sun.misc.Service.parse(Service.java:206) at sun.misc.Service.access$100(Service.java:111) at sun.misc.Service$LazyIterator.hasNext(Service.java:257) at javax.imageio.spi.IIORegistry.registerApplicationClasspathSpis(IIORegistry.java:173) at javax.imageio.spi.IIORegistry.init(IIORegistry.java:113) at javax.imageio.spi.IIORegistry.getDefaultInstance(IIORegistry.java:134) at javax.imageio.ImageIO.clinit(ImageIO.java:46) any help would be appreciated thank you F Yahoo! Mail : votre e-mail personnel et gratuit qui vous suit partout ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.benefits.yahoo.com/ Dialoguez en direct avec vos amis grâce à Yahoo! Messenger !Téléchargez Yahoo! Messenger sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CoyoteConnector startup errors
hello I have rh9, apache 2.0.49 , tomcat 4.1.30 and j2 connector, jk2-2.0.4 this is a brand new install. I appears to be working but i am getting errors when it starts CoyoteConnector Coyote can't register jmx for protocol I have seen a couple of references to this in the list archives, but have not seen any solutions. Has any one rectified this problem? Thanks randy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where to set JAVA_OPTS
No need to change the script. I normally set an Environment variable in the same place I define JAVA_HOME Go to Control Panel \ System \ Advanced tab \ Environment variables... Well, that's where it is on XP, which i'm currently running. HTH, Jon Giorgio Ponza wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Hi, Where do I need to set JAVA_OPTS (Should I edit catalina.bat file?). I am using Win 2k Pro and Tomcat 5. Thank you, Best Regards, Uma Hi usually i put my JAVA_OPTS in catalina.sh (in windows is catalina.bat) like this REM set JAVA_OPTS=-server -Xms128m -Xmx128m -verbose:gc -Xrunhprof:cpu=times,depth=6,thread=y,file=C:\log.txt set JAVA_OPTS=-server -Xms64m -Xmx64m echo Using CATALINA_BASE: %CATALINA_BASE% echo Using CATALINA_HOME: %CATALINA_HOME% echo Using CATALINA_TMPDIR: %CATALINA_TMPDIR% echo Using JAVA_HOME: %JAVA_HOME% echo using JAVA_OPTS: %JAVA_OPTS% it is used later in lines like %_EXECJAVA% %JAVA_OPTS% %CATALINA_OPTS% Hope i helped u bye Giorgio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[OT] how to save a form field to client
Hi all, Not really a Tomcat question but I'm hoping someone has a good suggestion. I have a Tomcat app with a chat client talking to a jabber chat server. A business requirement is to be able to click a button to save the chat transcript to the client hard drive. The only solution I've come up with so far is basically submitting the text area as an input to a servlet, that then saves the file to a temporary directory on the server and redirects the client request to that file, which would (hopefully) initiate the save or open dialog we all know and love. Can this work? Other ideas? Thanks! Andrew Longley Senior Developer MindFlow Technologies, Inc. (972) 930-9988 x139 http://www.mindflow.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
request.getUserPrincipal();
Hi All, I am trying to perform client authentication using certificates, and I have made some progress - the certificates are now accepted as OK, which is nice. Obviously I am using https too... However, the sting is that the methods request.getAuthType(); request.getRemoteUser(); request.getUserPrincipal(); All return NULL, which is contrary to the documentation, since I know the user (i.e. me) has authenticated. clientAuth=true in server.xml. Anyone else out there had this problem, and more to the point found a solution? Cheers, Graeme - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where to set JAVA_OPTS
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 14:43, Jon Wingfield wrote: No need to change the script. I normally set an Environment variable in the same place I define JAVA_HOME Go to Control Panel \ System \ Advanced tab \ Environment variables... Well, that's where it is on XP, which i'm currently running. same on Windows 2000 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where to set JAVA_OPTS
Jon Wingfield ha scritto: No need to change the script. I normally set an Environment variable in the same place I define JAVA_HOME Go to Control Panel \ System \ Advanced tab \ Environment variables... Well, that's where it is on XP, which i'm currently running. HTH, Jon I don't think is a good approach, at least for me. An environment variable is accessible to all java programs. Modifying the script affects only tomcat. Bye Giorgio Giorgio Ponza wrote: Hi usually i put my JAVA_OPTS in catalina.sh (in windows is catalina.bat) like this REM set JAVA_OPTS=-server -Xms128m -Xmx128m -verbose:gc -Xrunhprof:cpu=times,depth=6,thread=y,file=C:\log.txt set JAVA_OPTS=-server -Xms64m -Xmx64m echo Using CATALINA_BASE: %CATALINA_BASE% echo Using CATALINA_HOME: %CATALINA_HOME% echo Using CATALINA_TMPDIR: %CATALINA_TMPDIR% echo Using JAVA_HOME: %JAVA_HOME% echo using JAVA_OPTS: %JAVA_OPTS% it is used later in lines like %_EXECJAVA% %JAVA_OPTS% %CATALINA_OPTS% Hope i helped u bye Giorgio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- --- Giorgio Ponza Web Developer Opla.com Ltd Tel. +39 011 7506233 Fax. +39 011 746179 http://www.opla.it --- Ci sono persone che hanno soldi e persone che sono ricche (Coco Chanel) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filter.init and JNDI resources
I just wrote a Filter that uses a JNDI provided datasource. When I try to access that datasource from the Filter.init(...) I get a exception: Caused by: javax.naming.NamingException: Cannot create resource instance at org.apache.naming.factory.ResourceEnvFactory.getObjectInstance(ResourceE nvFactory.java:146) at javax.naming.spi.NamingManager.getObjectInstance(NamingManager.java: 301) at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:838) at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:185) at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:826) at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:185) at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:826) at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:185) at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:826) at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:198) at org.apache.naming.SelectorContext.lookup(SelectorContext.java:183) at javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:347) at net.sf.hibernate.connection.DatasourceConnectionProvider.configure(Datas ourceConnectionProvider.java:44) ... 23 more But when I put the same init code in the Filter.doFilter(...) method such that it only executes once, but delayed until the webapp has been made available I have no problems. I skimmed the servlet 2.4 spec and found nothing stating the availability of JNDI resources at the time a filter is instantiated. I tried reordering my web.xml so that the resource-env-ref came before the problematic filter to no avail. Does this sound like a bug, an ambiguous part of the Servlet spec, or am I missing something? Sandy McArthur - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where to set JAVA_OPTS
Hi, Yup, same here. I don't like to rely on the environment. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Giorgio Ponza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 9:56 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Where to set JAVA_OPTS Jon Wingfield ha scritto: No need to change the script. I normally set an Environment variable in the same place I define JAVA_HOME Go to Control Panel \ System \ Advanced tab \ Environment variables... Well, that's where it is on XP, which i'm currently running. HTH, Jon I don't think is a good approach, at least for me. An environment variable is accessible to all java programs. Modifying the script affects only tomcat. Bye Giorgio Giorgio Ponza wrote: Hi usually i put my JAVA_OPTS in catalina.sh (in windows is catalina.bat) like this REM set JAVA_OPTS=-server -Xms128m -Xmx128m -verbose:gc -Xrunhprof:cpu=times,depth=6,thread=y,file=C:\log.txt set JAVA_OPTS=-server -Xms64m -Xmx64m echo Using CATALINA_BASE: %CATALINA_BASE% echo Using CATALINA_HOME: %CATALINA_HOME% echo Using CATALINA_TMPDIR: %CATALINA_TMPDIR% echo Using JAVA_HOME: %JAVA_HOME% echo using JAVA_OPTS: %JAVA_OPTS% it is used later in lines like %_EXECJAVA% %JAVA_OPTS% %CATALINA_OPTS% Hope i helped u bye Giorgio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- --- Giorgio Ponza Web Developer Opla.com Ltd Tel. +39 011 7506233 Fax. +39 011 746179 http://www.opla.it --- Ci sono persone che hanno soldi e persone che sono ricche (Coco Chanel) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wrapping Requests and jsp:include
I know that works. My main concern was does tomcat internally construct a new request. Because then I wouldn't be getting my wrapped request in the included page. But it appears to pass along the original request object (whatever it is). -Original Message- From: Yan Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 12:10 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Wrapping Requests and jsp:include Hi, I think that's the correct behaviour for jsp:include action. The request is shared among all the included pages. If you are still in doubt, you can do a simple test by setting a param in your request for you main jsp file, then try to retrieve it in your included jsp file. Hope this helps:). -Yan --- Mike Curwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm just wanting to check if something is consistent with Spec. I've tested code that performs the following, in tomcat 4.1.29, and it 'works as expected'. So I'm curious if this is a 'guaranteed' behaviour across all containers, or if this is one of those fuzzy areas, and it just happily works in Tomcat. I am using com.oreilly.servlet to upload files and I'm using them through a file upload filter and MultipartRequestWrapper class (borrowing heavily from those available in cos). in process.jsp: -- % MultipartRequestWrapper multi = (MultipartRequestWrapper) request; filename = multi.getFilesystemName(image_1); logger.debug(filename: + filename); % jsp:include page=someOtherJsp.jsp / -- in someOtherJsp.jsp: -- % MultipartRequestWrapper multi = (MultipartRequestWrapper) request; filename = multi.getFilesystemName(image_1); logger.debug(filename: + filename); % In my log4j logs: DEBUG com.gbim.web.FileUploadFilter - [wrapping request] DEBUG booster/process.jsp - [filename: separator.gif] DEBUG booster/someOtherJsp.jsp - [filename: separator.gif] So: I can access the request again, in the included file, as a MultiPartRequestWrapper. So when Tomcat, the container, makes its internal jsp:include request, it passes along the *existing* request, wrapped and everything, as is. I seemed to recall some conversation about facades getting in the way, but this has been taken care of since ? Or was I dreaming? I've googled for this (probably imagined) conversation, and can't find it. --- mike curwen intermediate programmer globally boundless 204 885-7733 ext 229 www.globallyboundless.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where to set JAVA_OPTS
We use the setenv.sh. (tomcat 4.1xxx) for all custom environment variables as well as java options. catalina.sh references this script: # Get standard environment variables PRGDIR=`dirname $PRG` CATALINA_HOME=`cd $PRGDIR/.. ; pwd` if [ -r $CATALINA_HOME/bin/setenv.sh ]; then . $CATALINA_HOME/bin/setenv.sh fi catalina.bat has a similar reference. We create a setenv.sh in the bin directory and place ALL environment variables in it, including CATALINA_OPTS. Example contents: export CATALINA_HOME=/usr/local/tomcat # jvm command line options for tomcat export CATALINA_OPTS=-mx128m # db/2 env export PATH=$PATH:/home/db2inst1/sqllib/bin export LIBPATH=$LIBPATH:/home/db2inst1/sqllib/lib export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/db2inst1/sqllib/lib david Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] .comcc: Subject: RE: Where to set JAVA_OPTS 04/07/2004 09:57 AM Please respond to Tomcat Users List Hi, Yup, same here. I don't like to rely on the environment. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Giorgio Ponza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 9:56 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Where to set JAVA_OPTS Jon Wingfield ha scritto: No need to change the script. I normally set an Environment variable in the same place I define JAVA_HOME Go to Control Panel \ System \ Advanced tab \ Environment variables... Well, that's where it is on XP, which i'm currently running. HTH, Jon I don't think is a good approach, at least for me. An environment variable is accessible to all java programs. Modifying the script affects only tomcat. Bye Giorgio Giorgio Ponza wrote: Hi usually i put my JAVA_OPTS in catalina.sh (in windows is catalina.bat) like this REM set JAVA_OPTS=-server -Xms128m -Xmx128m -verbose:gc -Xrunhprof:cpu=times,depth=6,thread=y,file=C:\log.txt set JAVA_OPTS=-server -Xms64m -Xmx64m echo Using CATALINA_BASE: %CATALINA_BASE% echo Using CATALINA_HOME: %CATALINA_HOME% echo Using CATALINA_TMPDIR: %CATALINA_TMPDIR% echo Using JAVA_HOME: %JAVA_HOME% echo using JAVA_OPTS: %JAVA_OPTS% it is used later in lines like %_EXECJAVA% %JAVA_OPTS% %CATALINA_OPTS% Hope i helped u bye Giorgio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Filter.init and JNDI resources
I've been successful looking up a JNDI datasource from filter init(). I use Tomcat 4.1.29 on slackware9. -Original Message- From: Sandy McArthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Filter.init and JNDI resources I just wrote a Filter that uses a JNDI provided datasource. When I try to access that datasource from the Filter.init(...) I get a exception: Caused by: javax.naming.NamingException: Cannot create resource instance at org.apache.naming.factory.ResourceEnvFactory.getObjectInstance (ResourceE nvFactory.java:146) at javax.naming.spi.NamingManager.getObjectInstance(NamingManager.java: 301) at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:838) at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:185) at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:826) at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:185) at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:826) at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:185) at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:826) at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:198) at org.apache.naming.SelectorContext.lookup(SelectorContext.java:183) at javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:347) at net.sf.hibernate.connection.DatasourceConnectionProvider.confi gure(Datas ourceConnectionProvider.java:44) ... 23 more But when I put the same init code in the Filter.doFilter(...) method such that it only executes once, but delayed until the webapp has been made available I have no problems. I skimmed the servlet 2.4 spec and found nothing stating the availability of JNDI resources at the time a filter is instantiated. I tried reordering my web.xml so that the resource-env-ref came before the problematic filter to no avail. Does this sound like a bug, an ambiguous part of the Servlet spec, or am I missing something? Sandy McArthur - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
handling page redirects
I have the following in a jsp file
%@ include file=applicationimports.inc %
%@ include file=connection.inc %
%@ include file=sessioncheck.inc %
%
CustomerHTTPManagementScreen customerHTTPManagementScreen =
(CustomerHTTPManagementScreen)session.getAttribute(customerHTTPManagementScreen);
if( customerHTTPManagementScreen == null )
{
response.sendRedirect(tmWebApp.getTMTokenizedPageProcessor().tokenizeLink(main.jsp));
return;
}
if( request.getParameter(submit) != null )
{
if( request.getParameter(submit).equals(Modify Order) )
{
response.sendRedirect(tmWebApp.getTMTokenizedPageProcessor().tokenizeLink(orderentry.jsp?OpenOrder=
+ customerHTTPManagementScreen.getOrderHeaderID()));
return;
}
String key;
Hashtable parameters = new Hashtable();
for( Enumeration e = request.getParameterNames(); e.hasMoreElements()
;)
{
key = (String)e.nextElement();
parameters.put(key, request.getParameter(key));
}
customerHTTPManagementScreen.processPerformed( new
ProcessEvent(request.getParameter(submit), parameters) );
}
response.sendRedirect(tmWebApp.getTMTokenizedPageProcessor().tokenizeLink(customer.jsp));
%
This file handles the processing for its connected jsp page (it is directed here to do
the processing).
As you can see near the end is calls processPerformed, that sends the submit to the
parent class. The parent class then does most of the process, then it is redirected
back to the connected parent jsp (in this case custoner.jsp)
What I want to do here is get the submit of Modify Order to be handled by my web
application. My web application main class is tmWebApp, it already has response and
request available to it, so I could call the redirect from there.
The problem is, this jsp file will then try to redirect the page again on the last
call. How do I determine if the application already redirected this?
Is my only option to catch an IllegalStateException or check isCommited()? Not as if
that is a bad idea, but would there be anything else here that would get in my way,
like is there anything else that would set that response to be commited?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Filter.init and JNDI resources
Hi, Me too, though I haven't done it in a while. What tomcat version are you using? I just wrote a Filter that uses a JNDI provided datasource. When I try to access that datasource from the Filter.init(...) I get a exception: Caused by: javax.naming.NamingException: Cannot create resource instance Please post the server.xml segment that defines this JNDI resource. I tried reordering my web.xml so that the resource-env-ref came before the problematic filter to no avail. This wouldn't make a difference: if your web.xml is valid, it's valid. If your web.xml is invalid, you would've gotten an error on startup and not gotten this far. Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
catalina.out log
I am getting these odd logs in the Catalina.out. 67928 7830 1 67928 7830 1 I am not sure what they are but I get them often and they always come in groups of three numbers. Thanks,
Re: Custom session tracking method?
Since you're rewriting your CGI scripts as servlets, why not modify
them
to not expect the session-num parameter, and instead get the session ID
via normal java code (request.getSession().getId())? It's simpler,
standard, less code for you to write and test...
My problem is the client, which is a desktop app, doesn't support
cookies and uses hardcoded URIs for the cgi's. The app is what uses the
query parameter session-num for session tracking, otherwise I would
prefer to use the normal session tracking semantics.
Sandy
For those who didn't see the original post on tomcat-dev:
On Apr 7, 2004, at 8:54 AM, Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
The reason your approach feels ugly and fragile to you is because it IS
;) Session-tracking is mandated by a couple of specs (J2EE, Servlet),
and tomcat implements it per the spec. If you do something different,
you will very likely have misbehaving 3rd party libraries that rely on
proper session tracking behavior.
Since you're rewriting your CGI scripts as servlets, why not modify
them
to not expect the session-num parameter, and instead get the session ID
via normal java code (request.getSession().getId())? It's simpler,
standard, less code for you to write and test...
Please continue this discussion on the tomcat-user list, not
tomcat-dev.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Sandy McArthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 5:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Custom session tracking method?
Hi all,
Is there a way to implement custom session tracking at the container
level?
I'm trying to figure out how to implement a custom session tracking
method. I have a legacy client that interacts with a set of cgi
scripts
and I'd like to port those scripts to servlets. I'm running into a
problem because the client passes session ids as a query parameter
named 'session-num' (e.g.: /update?session-num=TOKEN). The client does
not support cookies and there is no way to tell it use a JSESSIONID
encoded in the path.
I've followed the code as best as I can starting at
org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteAdapter parses the JSESSIONID from the
request/cookies to where the org.apache.catalina.Manager fetches the
org.apache.catalina.Session and I don't see anyway to directly
override
the session tracking behavior.
The best idea I currently have is to use a Valve and a custom Manager
and hope none of the Manager.{create,find}Session() methods are called
before my Valve can parse the request and stuff the session-num in a
ThreadLocal that Manager can use when returning a Session.
That feels ugly and fragile to me. Does anyone have a better solution?
Sandy McArthur
This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business
communication, and may contain information that is confidential,
proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the
individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied,
printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an)
intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your
computer system and notify the sender. Thank you.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki page on tomcat and PHP
Hi, I've just created a wiki page for integrating tomcat with PHP (without Apache): http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tomcat/UsingPhp. If you're interesting in this area, please try it out and report your findings. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TEI Classloading
Hi. With regards the TEI classloading issue I mentioned in my previous mail (Issues on Tomcat5.0.19) - I *think* that the engine reports this error - but in previous versions of Tomcat the exception was not thrown (bubbled to the top) - blocking the running of ANY JSP page referencing the taglib in question. Maybe in Tomcat 5.0.19 this exception should be caught and logged but not thrown all the way to the top? Yoav: To replicate it is easy of course: Create a custom tag-lib - the tld file and some classes for the tags - however one or more of your tags MUST have a TEI class in the Tag definition in the TLD file - but the class file this TEI class entry reference must NOT exist in the classpath. This *should* cause ANY page that includes/reference the tag library to throw an exception about not being able to find the TEI class - running in Tomcat 5.0.19. With regards my reasoning - I deployed a site of ours to JBoss (embedding Tomcat 4.1.29) today - and noticed that the ENGINE component was reporting the exception about not finding certain TEI classes - however the webapp deployment worked fine. Now - I know this is not the error I reported in ym last mail - but it is related I think. In my mail I mentioned that on the first request to a site running on Tomcat 5.0.19 after a restart I SOMETIMES (I would say 30% of the time) get the same exception - except that the TEI class the exception was being reported on ACTUALLY DOES exist in the webapp's /WEB-INF/classes path. It seems that the classloader has not finished loading (is that possible?) at the time that tomcat tries to compile the JSP (which involves parsing any custom taglibs the page references). Unfortunately I have not got an EASY SMALL replication the the instance where the the class does exists and the exception is thrown - working on it! Any thoughts will be appreciated. Carl Olivier Director tel +27 21 7955197 fax +27 21 7955212 cell +27 82 7729753 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.zero-one.co.za developers of the future 01 zero one - Confidentiality agreement: This email contains information which is the property of Zero One. The information contained herein is confidential and may not be disclosed to any parties other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of Zero One.
RE: Custom session tracking method?
How does your legacy client *first* get the session id ?
the client passes session ids as a query
parameter named 'session-num'
From whence does the session-num query parameter come? Does the
legacy client create a random number and use it? Do the cgi scripts
pass it back on a login of some sort, and then from that point, the
legacy app appends it to any further queries?
-Original Message-
From: Sandy McArthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:21 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Custom session tracking method?
Since you're rewriting your CGI scripts as servlets, why not modify
them
to not expect the session-num parameter, and instead get
the session ID
via normal java code (request.getSession().getId())? It's simpler,
standard, less code for you to write and test...
My problem is the client, which is a desktop app, doesn't support
cookies and uses hardcoded URIs for the cgi's. The app is
what uses the
query parameter session-num for session tracking, otherwise I would
prefer to use the normal session tracking semantics.
Sandy
For those who didn't see the original post on tomcat-dev:
On Apr 7, 2004, at 8:54 AM, Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
The reason your approach feels ugly and fragile to you is
because it
IS
;) Session-tracking is mandated by a couple of specs
(J2EE, Servlet),
and tomcat implements it per the spec. If you do something
different,
you will very likely have misbehaving 3rd party libraries
that rely on
proper session tracking behavior.
Since you're rewriting your CGI scripts as servlets, why not modify
them
to not expect the session-num parameter, and instead get
the session ID
via normal java code (request.getSession().getId())? It's simpler,
standard, less code for you to write and test...
Please continue this discussion on the tomcat-user list, not
tomcat-dev.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Sandy McArthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 5:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Custom session tracking method?
Hi all,
Is there a way to implement custom session tracking at the
container
level?
I'm trying to figure out how to implement a custom session
tracking
method. I have a legacy client that interacts with a set of cgi
scripts and I'd like to port those scripts to servlets.
I'm running
into a problem because the client passes session ids as a query
parameter named 'session-num' (e.g.:
/update?session-num=TOKEN). The
client does not support cookies and there is no way to
tell it use a
JSESSIONID encoded in the path.
I've followed the code as best as I can starting at
org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteAdapter parses the JSESSIONID from
the request/cookies to where the
org.apache.catalina.Manager fetches
the org.apache.catalina.Session and I don't see anyway to directly
override the session tracking behavior.
The best idea I currently have is to use a Valve and a
custom Manager
and hope none of the Manager.{create,find}Session() methods are
called before my Valve can parse the request and stuff the
session-num in a ThreadLocal that Manager can use when
returning a
Session.
That feels ugly and fragile to me. Does anyone have a better
solution?
Sandy McArthur
This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business
communication, and may contain information that is confidential,
proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended
only for the
individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be
saved, copied,
printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an)
intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your
computer system and notify the sender. Thank you.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TEI Classloading
Hi, Unfortunately I have not got an EASY SMALL replication the the instance where the the class does exists and the exception is thrown - working on it! Any thoughts will be appreciated. Thank you for the detailed description. Make sure you save the message you sent. Once you come up with a small WAR that shows the problem, create a bugzilla issue for it (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/), attach your WAR and the email you just sent. We will attempt to reproduce the problem and come up with a solution ;) Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wrapping Requests and jsp:include
Hey, you may want to try the question on the dev list. But IMHO if tomcat does not follow the spec, then it would be a bug. um, can you think of any other ways of retrieving the image without using a wrapper? if you are simply viewing the image, there may be a easier way. But I am not sure what you are doing exactly -Yan -Original Message- From: Mike Curwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:19 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Wrapping Requests and jsp:include I know that works. My main concern was does tomcat internally construct a new request. Because then I wouldn't be getting my wrapped request in the included page. But it appears to pass along the original request object (whatever it is). -Original Message- From: Yan Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 12:10 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Wrapping Requests and jsp:include Hi, I think that's the correct behaviour for jsp:include action. The request is shared among all the included pages. If you are still in doubt, you can do a simple test by setting a param in your request for you main jsp file, then try to retrieve it in your included jsp file. Hope this helps:). -Yan --- Mike Curwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm just wanting to check if something is consistent with Spec. I've tested code that performs the following, in tomcat 4.1.29, and it 'works as expected'. So I'm curious if this is a 'guaranteed' behaviour across all containers, or if this is one of those fuzzy areas, and it just happily works in Tomcat. I am using com.oreilly.servlet to upload files and I'm using them through a file upload filter and MultipartRequestWrapper class (borrowing heavily from those available in cos). in process.jsp: -- % MultipartRequestWrapper multi = (MultipartRequestWrapper) request; filename = multi.getFilesystemName(image_1); logger.debug(filename: + filename); % jsp:include page=someOtherJsp.jsp / -- in someOtherJsp.jsp: -- % MultipartRequestWrapper multi = (MultipartRequestWrapper) request; filename = multi.getFilesystemName(image_1); logger.debug(filename: + filename); % In my log4j logs: DEBUG com.gbim.web.FileUploadFilter - [wrapping request] DEBUG booster/process.jsp - [filename: separator.gif] DEBUG booster/someOtherJsp.jsp - [filename: separator.gif] So: I can access the request again, in the included file, as a MultiPartRequestWrapper. So when Tomcat, the container, makes its internal jsp:include request, it passes along the *existing* request, wrapped and everything, as is. I seemed to recall some conversation about facades getting in the way, but this has been taken care of since ? Or was I dreaming? I've googled for this (probably imagined) conversation, and can't find it. --- mike curwen intermediate programmer globally boundless 204 885-7733 ext 229 www.globallyboundless.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Filter.init and JNDI resources
On Apr 7, 2004, at 10:40 AM, Shapira, Yoav wrote: Me too, though I haven't done it in a while. What tomcat version are you using? Tomcat 5.0.19 on Mac OS X. I just wrote a Filter that uses a JNDI provided datasource. When I try to access that datasource from the Filter.init(...) I get a exception: Caused by: javax.naming.NamingException: Cannot create resource instance Please post the server.xml segment that defines this JNDI resource. server.xml: GlobalNamingResources Resource name=jdbc/test2 auth=Container scope=Shareable type=javax.sql.DataSource description=JDBC Connection to the DAAP database/ ResourceParams name=jdbc/test2 parameter namefactory/name valueorg.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory/value !-- Validation: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/dbcp/configuration.html -- /parameter !-- DBCP database connection settings -- parameter nameurl/name valuejdbc:postgresql://localhost/test2/value /parameter parameter namedriverClassName/name valueorg.postgresql.Driver/value /parameter parameter nameusername/name value[removed]/value /parameter parameter namepassword/name value[removed]/value /parameter !-- DBCP connection pooling options -- parameter !-- How long (millis) to wait for a free connection. Deafult: indefinatly, current: 5 seconds -- namemaxWait/name value5000/value /parameter parameter !-- The query that verifies a connection. -- namevalidationQuery/name valueSELECT version();/value /parameter /ResourceParams /GlobalNamingResources [...trimmed...] DefaultContext ResourceLink name=jdbc/test2 global=jdbc/test2 type=javax.sql.DataSource/ /DefaultContext web.xml: resource-env-ref descriptionDataSource for the test2 database./description resource-env-ref-namejdbc/test2/resource-env-ref-name resource-env-ref-typejavax.sql.DataSource/resource-env-ref-type /resource-env-ref I don't think there is a problem with this datasource. I use it both in a DataSourceRealm and it works in my webapp except when I try to access it in my latest Filter.init(...). I can use it fine in Filter.doFilter(...). I tried reordering my web.xml so that the resource-env-ref came before the problematic filter to no avail. This wouldn't make a difference: if your web.xml is valid, it's valid. If your web.xml is invalid, you would've gotten an error on startup and not gotten this far. Yoav Shapira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat and SSL: problem with expiration of VeriSign Global Server ID Intermediate Root
Hi again, Now that the VeriSign Global Server ID Intermediate Root cert has expired I have to replace the Intermediate Root cert on the server. There is an example on how to replace the cert on an apache server on their website (and that works fine), but no instructions how to replace it on an standalone tomcat server. It seems that the only way to solve this problem is to get a new cert from VeriSign. The german support-team had no problem to give me a new one for free because they think that the expiration is their problem, so they do anything to help the customer! To get a new cert just follow the instructions written down in the tomcat documentation (generate key, csr, get csr-response, import response). Thx again for your replies! Joern - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wrapping Requests and jsp:include
I only wanted to know if Tomcat wrapped the request object in a façade of some sort, when it does a jsp:include. Maybe I should have just asked that much simpler question. ;) (Or looked at the source of a compiled jsp page?) But well... there's still the question of that's the way Tomcat does it vs. this is how Resin does the same thing and whether or not there is a spec mandate to do it one way or another. What I'm trying (and succeeding) to do is access a multipart upload from included jsp files. I just want to make sure this same code would work 'everywhere'. -Original Message- From: Yansheng Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:39 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Wrapping Requests and jsp:include Hey, you may want to try the question on the dev list. But IMHO if tomcat does not follow the spec, then it would be a bug. um, can you think of any other ways of retrieving the image without using a wrapper? if you are simply viewing the image, there may be a easier way. But I am not sure what you are doing exactly -Yan -Original Message- From: Mike Curwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:19 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Wrapping Requests and jsp:include I know that works. My main concern was does tomcat internally construct a new request. Because then I wouldn't be getting my wrapped request in the included page. But it appears to pass along the original request object (whatever it is). -Original Message- From: Yan Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 12:10 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Wrapping Requests and jsp:include Hi, I think that's the correct behaviour for jsp:include action. The request is shared among all the included pages. If you are still in doubt, you can do a simple test by setting a param in your request for you main jsp file, then try to retrieve it in your included jsp file. Hope this helps:). -Yan --- Mike Curwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm just wanting to check if something is consistent with Spec. I've tested code that performs the following, in tomcat 4.1.29, and it 'works as expected'. So I'm curious if this is a 'guaranteed' behaviour across all containers, or if this is one of those fuzzy areas, and it just happily works in Tomcat. I am using com.oreilly.servlet to upload files and I'm using them through a file upload filter and MultipartRequestWrapper class (borrowing heavily from those available in cos). in process.jsp: -- % MultipartRequestWrapper multi = (MultipartRequestWrapper) request; filename = multi.getFilesystemName(image_1); logger.debug(filename: + filename); % jsp:include page=someOtherJsp.jsp / -- in someOtherJsp.jsp: -- % MultipartRequestWrapper multi = (MultipartRequestWrapper) request; filename = multi.getFilesystemName(image_1); logger.debug(filename: + filename); % In my log4j logs: DEBUG com.gbim.web.FileUploadFilter - [wrapping request] DEBUG booster/process.jsp - [filename: separator.gif] DEBUG booster/someOtherJsp.jsp - [filename: separator.gif] So: I can access the request again, in the included file, as a MultiPartRequestWrapper. So when Tomcat, the container, makes its internal jsp:include request, it passes along the *existing* request, wrapped and everything, as is. I seemed to recall some conversation about facades getting in the way, but this has been taken care of since ? Or was I dreaming? I've googled for this (probably imagined) conversation, and can't find it. --- mike curwen intermediate programmer globally boundless 204 885-7733 ext 229 www.globallyboundless.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:
Re: Custom session tracking method?
The first request the legacy app makes is to /login which it uses your
normal Basic authentication which is nice because I can use a standard
Realm. In the response to /login is a session number the client should
use along with some data about the user's account. Unfortunately the
session number must fit in a 4 byte integer in the app. :( After that
the session is passed around via the session-num query param.
Sandy McArthur
On Apr 7, 2004, at 11:33 AM, Mike Curwen wrote:
How does your legacy client *first* get the session id ?
the client passes session ids as a query
parameter named 'session-num'
From whence does the session-num query parameter come? Does the
legacy client create a random number and use it? Do the cgi scripts
pass it back on a login of some sort, and then from that point, the
legacy app appends it to any further queries?
-Original Message-
From: Sandy McArthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:21 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Custom session tracking method?
Since you're rewriting your CGI scripts as servlets, why not modify
them
to not expect the session-num parameter, and instead get
the session ID
via normal java code (request.getSession().getId())? It's simpler,
standard, less code for you to write and test...
My problem is the client, which is a desktop app, doesn't support
cookies and uses hardcoded URIs for the cgi's. The app is
what uses the
query parameter session-num for session tracking, otherwise I would
prefer to use the normal session tracking semantics.
Sandy
For those who didn't see the original post on tomcat-dev:
On Apr 7, 2004, at 8:54 AM, Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
The reason your approach feels ugly and fragile to you is
because it
IS
;) Session-tracking is mandated by a couple of specs
(J2EE, Servlet),
and tomcat implements it per the spec. If you do something
different,
you will very likely have misbehaving 3rd party libraries
that rely on
proper session tracking behavior.
Since you're rewriting your CGI scripts as servlets, why not modify
them
to not expect the session-num parameter, and instead get
the session ID
via normal java code (request.getSession().getId())? It's simpler,
standard, less code for you to write and test...
Please continue this discussion on the tomcat-user list, not
tomcat-dev.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Sandy McArthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 5:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Custom session tracking method?
Hi all,
Is there a way to implement custom session tracking at the
container
level?
I'm trying to figure out how to implement a custom session
tracking
method. I have a legacy client that interacts with a set of cgi
scripts and I'd like to port those scripts to servlets.
I'm running
into a problem because the client passes session ids as a query
parameter named 'session-num' (e.g.:
/update?session-num=TOKEN). The
client does not support cookies and there is no way to
tell it use a
JSESSIONID encoded in the path.
I've followed the code as best as I can starting at
org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteAdapter parses the JSESSIONID from
the request/cookies to where the
org.apache.catalina.Manager fetches
the org.apache.catalina.Session and I don't see anyway to directly
override the session tracking behavior.
The best idea I currently have is to use a Valve and a
custom Manager
and hope none of the Manager.{create,find}Session() methods are
called before my Valve can parse the request and stuff the
session-num in a ThreadLocal that Manager can use when
returning a
Session.
That feels ugly and fragile to me. Does anyone have a better
solution?
Sandy McArthur
This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business
communication, and may contain information that is confidential,
proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended
only for the
individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be
saved, copied,
printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an)
intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your
computer system and notify the sender. Thank you.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: JK2 connector built and installed but is there something wrong?
OK, well now I know why. I had added an examples directory and 1 html page under the htdocs dir of my Apache Webserver. That's because the port number is 8080, not 80. Thanks. --- Mark Nye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I had a similar problem. The line for the uri has to have a directory that is under $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps. [uri:/jsp-examples/*] would require the directory $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/jsp-examples. As Drew said you can try servlets-examples instead of jsp-examples. Those directories are under the webapps folder by default. Mark -Original Message- From: Hamilton, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:28 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: JK2 connector built and installed but is there something wrong? try doing this [uri:/jsp-examples/*] worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 There is no examples structure. You can also try servlets-examples. Drew -Original Message- From: Kevin Struckhoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 7:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JK2 connector built and installed but is there something wrong? After downloading the source and building it, I finally have mod_jk2 at least loaded into Apache Web Server 2.0.48. However, in the docs, it says to add these 2 directives to workers2.properties: [uri:/examples/*] worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 When I send the browser to http://localhost/examples/, I get a -404 error (not found). What am I missing? Apache starts up just fine. TIA. = Thanks. Kevin -- Enjoy Life, Drink and Code Java! __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Thanks. Kevin -- Enjoy Life, Drink and Code Java! __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat
Okay...that looks similar to the tomcat 4 information I haveis your connector working correctly? -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 6:06 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat My configuration is for tomcat 5: Service name=Catalina Connector acceptCount=100 connectionTimeout=2 disableUploadTimeout=true port=8080 redirectPort=8443 /Connector Connector port=8009 enableLookups=false redirectPort=8443 debug=0 protocol=AJP/1.3 / Engine defaultHost=localhost name=Catalina Host appBase=webapps name=localhost Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=localhost_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ ... ... Wilson, Allen wrote: Here are the lines. Connector className=org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector port=8080 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true redirectPort=8443 acceptCount=100 debug=0 connectionTimeout=2 / !-- Define an AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 -- Connector className=org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Connector port=8009 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 acceptCount=10 debug=0/ Let me know if there is something that is incorrect. -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 4:28 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat You said you can connect through port 8009 through the browser??? The jk protocol is not http, so if the configuration was allright you can't connect through 8009 as http. Maybe the error is at your server.xml... Wilson, Allen wrote: Thanks but this is on a Windows system and will not help...I am on a Solaris and I have looked at documents like this before and they still do not give me a definitive way of setting everything and testing it... Right now I have the HTTP server (port 80), Tomcat (port 8080), and the connector (8009) running. I even looked at the netstat to see if each port was available...and they were. When a do the home page request (http://myserver.com) it works fine...but if I request the page for the Jetspeed Portal (http://myserver.com/portal), I get an error. If I request the portal page through port 8080 it works fine. If I request the same page on 8009 it works fine. In all cases there were no entries in my mod_jk.log. I am looking for something that will outline the steps for me on a Solaris machine or at least give me a better way to diagnose what I am doing wrong -Original Message- From: kwilding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 10:55 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat http://www.greenfieldresearch.ca/technical/jk2_config.html This was a really good starting point. Ignore the fact it talks abut windows, I imstaled on SuSE8.2 using apache2.0.48 and both tomcat 4 and 5 Kevan -Original Message- From: Wilson, Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 April 2004 16:42 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Good morning Can any provide some assistance on connecting the HTTP server and Tomcat together. I am using HTTP Server 2.0.48 and Tomcat-4.1.18 on a Sun Solaris machine. I think I have everything in place but when the only way I can reach the Tomcat stuff is my specifying the port number in the URL. Can someone point me in the direction of some How to connect Apache and Tomcat for Dummies instructions that will provide me some clear steps and methods for checking everything out. Thanks...and any help is appreciated. Allen This message may contain proprietary or confidential company information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message may contain proprietary or confidential company information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Emerson Cargnin Analista de Sistemas Setor de Desenvolvimento de Sistemas - TRE-SC tel : (048) - 251-3700 - Ramal 3181
RE: Custom session tracking method?
So I'd have a servlet mapped to /login.
Protect it with Basic Auth, so that takes care of the Auth, and then
you're passed on to the /login servlet. This login servlet creates a
new session, and then does one extra step.
It maps in the ServletContext ('application') the custom session-num
you've just created , to the jsessionid.
your client does not have cookies. It does not have a jsessionid in the
URL either. So to Tomcat, any subsequent requests would appear to have
no session. So...
Construct a filter, mapped to '/*' (everything). In the filter,
retrieve the session-num from the request parameters, lookup the actual
jsessionid from the application context, and then
This is where it gets fuzzy for me...
1) 'append' the jsessionid as a parameter and doChain() ? (that probably
won't work, jsessionid in the URL is more special than just 'another
parameter').
2) 'rewrite' the URL yourself, placing the jsessionid where it ought to
be
http://www.foo.com/originalURI;jsessionid=56D49A19C332F095C79CABFC621B50
B1.tomcat2?originalParam1=AoriginalParam2=Betc
And then .forwad() this request, but don't doChain().
Is any of that craziness ??
-Original Message-
From: Sandy McArthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:45 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Custom session tracking method?
The first request the legacy app makes is to /login which it
uses your
normal Basic authentication which is nice because I can use a
standard
Realm. In the response to /login is a session number the
client should
use along with some data about the user's account. Unfortunately the
session number must fit in a 4 byte integer in the app. :( After that
the session is passed around via the session-num query param.
Sandy McArthur
On Apr 7, 2004, at 11:33 AM, Mike Curwen wrote:
How does your legacy client *first* get the session id ?
the client passes session ids as a query
parameter named 'session-num'
From whence does the session-num query parameter come? Does the
legacy client create a random number and use it? Do the
cgi scripts
pass it back on a login of some sort, and then from that point, the
legacy app appends it to any further queries?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: catalina.out log
Hi, Did you grep your code for System.out/System.err print/println statements? Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Rob Wichterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 11:19 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: catalina.out log I am getting these odd logs in the Catalina.out. 67928 7830 1 67928 7830 1 I am not sure what they are but I get them often and they always come in groups of three numbers. Thanks, This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: hostage to this list
Hi, This happened to me once when I changed my email address. But it's wierd that you didn't get a reply... Maybe tomcat mail server demon doesn't want to let you go:). Oh, the address you use to unsubscribe from the list has to be the same as the one you used to subscribe. -Yan -Original Message- From: Tracy Bost [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 8:16 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: hostage to this list I really enjoy this list, but have been trying to unsubscribe several times today and never receive a reply back when sending to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's the deal here ? Is there no way out ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Your document
Please read the attached file. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MX4J 2.0 JRMP on Tomcat 4.1.29
I have this exception : ERROR app MX4j RMI adapter not loaded: javax.management.ReflectionException: null nested exception is java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: mx4j.adaptor.rmi.jrmp.JRMPAdaptor I think it's due to the JSR 160 implementation of MX4 J2.0 that have dropped the RMPAdaptor. I can't get an older version of MX4J and I think that RMI adapter for using a JMX console like MC4J is a requirement. I need some help ! Thanks, Regards , Arnaud
reload jk2-settings?
hi tomcat-users i set up jk2 with apache and tomcat and it works just fine. but now i have changed the uri-definitions in workers2.properties. after this i restarted apache and tomcat - and nothing changed! is there any way to explicitly reload the workers2.properties file? i can remove an entire uri-mapping in the file, restart both apache and tomcat - and the removed uri just works fine. like the module uses an old version of the file thanks and greetings stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
session tracking using uri not cookies (was How can I maintain state with Axis
With recent discussions about session management, I recalled long time ago reading about URI rewriting for when the client doesn't handle cookies properly, and found a useful article about it http://access1.sun.com/techarticles/sessions.iws.html URL rewriting is the ability to use sessions and session information if cookies have been disallowed or are not available on the client. URL rewriting can also be useful when, for example, proxy or firewall servers change or disallow cookies. Cookies are small bits of data stored by the client; for example by a Web browser. OK, this is for sun's iplanet, but the information might still be relevant to tomcat. Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat
Allen, do you have the web server configured to throw the requests over to Tomcat? In other words, have either Proxy support or else URL Rewriting turned on in the web server? Otherwise your HTTP requests default to port 80, so they will be eaten by the web server and never reach Tomcat, since Tomcat is listening on ports that the HTTP requests do not come to by default. Have you looked at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/proxy-howto.html - Bill -Original Message- From: Wilson, Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:54 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Okay...that looks similar to the tomcat 4 information I haveis your connector working correctly? -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 6:06 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat My configuration is for tomcat 5: Service name=Catalina Connector acceptCount=100 connectionTimeout=2 disableUploadTimeout=true port=8080 redirectPort=8443 /Connector Connector port=8009 enableLookups=false redirectPort=8443 debug=0 protocol=AJP/1.3 / Engine defaultHost=localhost name=Catalina Host appBase=webapps name=localhost Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=localhost_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ ... ... Wilson, Allen wrote: Here are the lines. Connector className=org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector port=8080 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true redirectPort=8443 acceptCount=100 debug=0 connectionTimeout=2 / !-- Define an AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 -- Connector className=org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Connector port=8009 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 acceptCount=10 debug=0/ Let me know if there is something that is incorrect. -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 4:28 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat You said you can connect through port 8009 through the browser??? The jk protocol is not http, so if the configuration was allright you can't connect through 8009 as http. Maybe the error is at your server.xml... Wilson, Allen wrote: Thanks but this is on a Windows system and will not help...I am on a Solaris and I have looked at documents like this before and they still do not give me a definitive way of setting everything and testing it... Right now I have the HTTP server (port 80), Tomcat (port 8080), and the connector (8009) running. I even looked at the netstat to see if each port was available...and they were. When a do the home page request (http://myserver.com) it works fine...but if I request the page for the Jetspeed Portal (http://myserver.com/portal), I get an error. If I request the portal page through port 8080 it works fine. If I request the same page on 8009 it works fine. In all cases there were no entries in my mod_jk.log. I am looking for something that will outline the steps for me on a Solaris machine or at least give me a better way to diagnose what I am doing wrong -Original Message- From: kwilding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 10:55 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat http://www.greenfieldresearch.ca/technical/jk2_config.html This was a really good starting point. Ignore the fact it talks abut windows, I imstaled on SuSE8.2 using apache2.0.48 and both tomcat 4 and 5 Kevan -Original Message- From: Wilson, Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 April 2004 16:42 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Good morning Can any provide some assistance on connecting the HTTP server and Tomcat together. I am using HTTP Server 2.0.48 and Tomcat-4.1.18 on a Sun Solaris machine. I think I have everything in place but when the only way I can reach the Tomcat stuff is my specifying the port number in the URL. Can someone point me in the direction of some How to connect Apache and Tomcat for Dummies instructions that will provide me some clear steps and methods for checking everything out. Thanks...and any help is appreciated. Allen This message may contain proprietary or confidential company information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] how to save a form field to client
Yes, that can work. A small applet with proper permissions granted would do the trick as well. justin At 06:45 AM 4/7/2004, you wrote: Hi all, Not really a Tomcat question but I'm hoping someone has a good suggestion. I have a Tomcat app with a chat client talking to a jabber chat server. A business requirement is to be able to click a button to save the chat transcript to the client hard drive. The only solution I've come up with so far is basically submitting the text area as an input to a servlet, that then saves the file to a temporary directory on the server and redirects the client request to that file, which would (hopefully) initiate the save or open dialog we all know and love. Can this work? Other ideas? Thanks! Andrew Longley Senior Developer MindFlow Technologies, Inc. (972) 930-9988 x139 http://www.mindflow.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Justin Ruthenbeck Software Engineer, NextEngine Inc. justinr - AT - nextengine DOT com Confidential. See: http://www.nextengine.com/confidentiality.php __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JK2 Load Balancing Algorithms.
Is the only available JK2 load balancing algorithm a weighted round robin? I would like to switch to one that has a primary server and then switches to round robin to reach the secondary server when an error is thrown. The reason I would like to do this is because we have 5 web servers each with a apache/tomcat pair fronted by a Cisco Local Director. I would like the request to stay on the machine that cisco sent the request to as long as the local tomcat is accepting requests. I currely have annecdotal evidence that the current weight round robin approach is a little flakey and is sending WebServer01 more requests then are the server's fair share. I wrote a logging filter and some RequestHeader statements in the http.conf to try to get hard evidence that this is happening. Thanks, --Angus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
soft linking of directory in tomcat 4.1.27 is not working for me
Hi, I recently upgraded to tomcat 4.1.27. Some how the soft linking of directory within my web application directory is no longer accessible from a browser. It must be configuration issue. Can some please let me know how to configure tomcat 4.1.27 so that it will follow the soft linked directory. Thank you in advance, - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat
Bill..thanks for the reply... I will read through the link you provide but isn't that what the connector is supposed to do. My understanding what that the Apache HTTP server would detect what the request was (Java or not) and pass it on to Tomcat. Is this not what the specification of /portal/* ajp13 in the configuration does. This is what I got from the document at: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk.quickhowto.html Here is a little from one of the pages in that area... ( http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk/aphowto.html ) In a nutshell a web server is waiting for client HTTP requests. When these requests arrive the server does whatever is needed to serve the requests by providing the necessary content. Adding a servlet container may somewhat change this behavior. Now the web server needs also to perform the following: Load the servlet container adapter library and initialize it (prior to serving requests). When a request arrives, it needs to check and see if a certain request belongs to a servlet, if so it needs to let the adapter take the request and handle it. The adapter on the other hand needs to know what requests it is going to serve, usually based on some pattern in the request URL, and to where to direct these requests. Is this not correct...or am I misunderstanding it -Original Message- From: Bill Bruns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 12:26 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Allen, do you have the web server configured to throw the requests over to Tomcat? In other words, have either Proxy support or else URL Rewriting turned on in the web server? Otherwise your HTTP requests default to port 80, so they will be eaten by the web server and never reach Tomcat, since Tomcat is listening on ports that the HTTP requests do not come to by default. Have you looked at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/proxy-howto.html - Bill -Original Message- From: Wilson, Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:54 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Okay...that looks similar to the tomcat 4 information I haveis your connector working correctly? -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 6:06 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat My configuration is for tomcat 5: Service name=Catalina Connector acceptCount=100 connectionTimeout=2 disableUploadTimeout=true port=8080 redirectPort=8443 /Connector Connector port=8009 enableLookups=false redirectPort=8443 debug=0 protocol=AJP/1.3 / Engine defaultHost=localhost name=Catalina Host appBase=webapps name=localhost Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=localhost_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ ... ... Wilson, Allen wrote: Here are the lines. Connector className=org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector port=8080 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true redirectPort=8443 acceptCount=100 debug=0 connectionTimeout=2 / !-- Define an AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 -- Connector className=org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Connector port=8009 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 acceptCount=10 debug=0/ Let me know if there is something that is incorrect. -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 4:28 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat You said you can connect through port 8009 through the browser??? The jk protocol is not http, so if the configuration was allright you can't connect through 8009 as http. Maybe the error is at your server.xml... Wilson, Allen wrote: Thanks but this is on a Windows system and will not help...I am on a Solaris and I have looked at documents like this before and they still do not give me a definitive way of setting everything and testing it... Right now I have the HTTP server (port 80), Tomcat (port 8080), and the connector (8009) running. I even looked at the netstat to see if each port was available...and they were. When a do the home page request (http://myserver.com) it works fine...but if I request the page for the Jetspeed Portal (http://myserver.com/portal), I get an error. If I request the portal page through port 8080 it works fine. If I request the same page on 8009 it works fine. In all cases there were no entries in my mod_jk.log. I am looking for something that will outline the steps for me on a Solaris machine or at least give me a better way to diagnose what I am doing wrong -Original Message- From: kwilding [mailto:[EMAIL
Hello
I hope the patch works. Se eliminó Norton AntiVirus1.txt Description: plain/text - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat
Allen, you ask isn't that what the connector is supposed to do, but the connector is in Tomcat, not in your web server. It is the web server software that is monitoring port 80, and that is where your browser sends requests to by default, so the request must get past the web server first. To do that you need to tell the web server where to send them, namely to your Tomcat port. I think this accounts for the behaviour you told about, namely that Tomcat responds fine when you specify the port number in your URL. -Bill -Original Message- From: Wilson, Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 11:32 AM To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Bill..thanks for the reply... I will read through the link you provide but isn't that what the connector is supposed to do. My understanding what that the Apache HTTP server would detect what the request was (Java or not) and pass it on to Tomcat. Is this not what the specification of /portal/* ajp13 in the configuration does. This is what I got from the document at: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk.quickhowto.html Here is a little from one of the pages in that area... ( http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk/aphowto.html ) In a nutshell a web server is waiting for client HTTP requests. When these requests arrive the server does whatever is needed to serve the requests by providing the necessary content. Adding a servlet container may somewhat change this behavior. Now the web server needs also to perform the following: Load the servlet container adapter library and initialize it (prior to serving requests). When a request arrives, it needs to check and see if a certain request belongs to a servlet, if so it needs to let the adapter take the request and handle it. The adapter on the other hand needs to know what requests it is going to serve, usually based on some pattern in the request URL, and to where to direct these requests. Is this not correct...or am I misunderstanding it -Original Message- From: Bill Bruns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 12:26 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Allen, do you have the web server configured to throw the requests over to Tomcat? In other words, have either Proxy support or else URL Rewriting turned on in the web server? Otherwise your HTTP requests default to port 80, so they will be eaten by the web server and never reach Tomcat, since Tomcat is listening on ports that the HTTP requests do not come to by default. Have you looked at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/proxy-howto.html - Bill -Original Message- From: Wilson, Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:54 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Okay...that looks similar to the tomcat 4 information I haveis your connector working correctly? -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 6:06 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat My configuration is for tomcat 5: Service name=Catalina Connector acceptCount=100 connectionTimeout=2 disableUploadTimeout=true port=8080 redirectPort=8443 /Connector Connector port=8009 enableLookups=false redirectPort=8443 debug=0 protocol=AJP/1.3 / Engine defaultHost=localhost name=Catalina Host appBase=webapps name=localhost Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=localhost_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ ... ... Wilson, Allen wrote: Here are the lines. Connector className=org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector port=8080 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true redirectPort=8443 acceptCount=100 debug=0 connectionTimeout=2 / !-- Define an AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 -- Connector className=org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Connector port=8009 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 acceptCount=10 debug=0/ Let me know if there is something that is incorrect. -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 4:28 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat You said you can connect through port 8009 through the browser??? The jk protocol is not http, so if the configuration was allright you can't connect through 8009 as http. Maybe the error is at your server.xml... Wilson, Allen wrote: Thanks but this is on a Windows system and will not help...I am on a Solaris and I have looked at documents like this before and they still do not give me a definitive way of setting everything and testing it... Right
Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat
I may be way off but... I don't think http://myserver.com/portal maps to /portal/* ajp13 http://myserver.com/portal/ or http://myserver.com/portal/whatever.jsp probably will, though. Give it a go, may work, Jon Wilson, Allen wrote: Bill..thanks for the reply... I will read through the link you provide but isn't that what the connector is supposed to do. My understanding what that the Apache HTTP server would detect what the request was (Java or not) and pass it on to Tomcat. Is this not what the specification of /portal/* ajp13 in the configuration does. This is what I got from the document at: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk.quickhowto.html Here is a little from one of the pages in that area... ( http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk/aphowto.html ) In a nutshell a web server is waiting for client HTTP requests. When these requests arrive the server does whatever is needed to serve the requests by providing the necessary content. Adding a servlet container may somewhat change this behavior. Now the web server needs also to perform the following: Load the servlet container adapter library and initialize it (prior to serving requests). When a request arrives, it needs to check and see if a certain request belongs to a servlet, if so it needs to let the adapter take the request and handle it. The adapter on the other hand needs to know what requests it is going to serve, usually based on some pattern in the request URL, and to where to direct these requests. Is this not correct...or am I misunderstanding it -Original Message- From: Bill Bruns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 12:26 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Allen, do you have the web server configured to throw the requests over to Tomcat? In other words, have either Proxy support or else URL Rewriting turned on in the web server? Otherwise your HTTP requests default to port 80, so they will be eaten by the web server and never reach Tomcat, since Tomcat is listening on ports that the HTTP requests do not come to by default. Have you looked at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/proxy-howto.html - Bill -Original Message- From: Wilson, Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:54 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Okay...that looks similar to the tomcat 4 information I haveis your connector working correctly? -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 6:06 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat My configuration is for tomcat 5: Service name=Catalina Connector acceptCount=100 connectionTimeout=2 disableUploadTimeout=true port=8080 redirectPort=8443 /Connector Connector port=8009 enableLookups=false redirectPort=8443 debug=0 protocol=AJP/1.3 / Engine defaultHost=localhost name=Catalina Host appBase=webapps name=localhost Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=localhost_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ ... ... Wilson, Allen wrote: Here are the lines. Connector className=org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector port=8080 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true redirectPort=8443 acceptCount=100 debug=0 connectionTimeout=2 / !-- Define an AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 -- Connector className=org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Connector port=8009 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 acceptCount=10 debug=0/ Let me know if there is something that is incorrect. -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 4:28 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat You said you can connect through port 8009 through the browser??? The jk protocol is not http, so if the configuration was allright you can't connect through 8009 as http. Maybe the error is at your server.xml... Wilson, Allen wrote: Thanks but this is on a Windows system and will not help...I am on a Solaris and I have looked at documents like this before and they still do not give me a definitive way of setting everything and testing it... Right now I have the HTTP server (port 80), Tomcat (port 8080), and the connector (8009) running. I even looked at the netstat to see if each port was available...and they were. When a do the home page request (http://myserver.com) it works fine...but if I request the page for the Jetspeed Portal (http://myserver.com/portal), I get an error. If I request the portal page through port 8080 it works fine. If I request the same page on 8009 it works fine. In all cases there were no entries in my mod_jk.log. I am looking for something
RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat
No you are not way off...at least not from my point of view because that is what I thought would work. But unless I specify the port (http://myserver.com:8080/portal) it will not get there... It makes me think that the connector is not function correctly but I do not know how to tell..when I check the running ports I see the 8009 port running but it does not hand to Tomcat -Original Message- From: Jon Wingfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:09 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat I may be way off but... I don't think http://myserver.com/portal maps to /portal/* ajp13 http://myserver.com/portal/ or http://myserver.com/portal/whatever.jsp probably will, though. Give it a go, may work, Jon Wilson, Allen wrote: Bill..thanks for the reply... I will read through the link you provide but isn't that what the connector is supposed to do. My understanding what that the Apache HTTP server would detect what the request was (Java or not) and pass it on to Tomcat. Is this not what the specification of /portal/* ajp13 in the configuration does. This is what I got from the document at: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk.quickhowto.html Here is a little from one of the pages in that area... ( http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk/aphowto.html ) In a nutshell a web server is waiting for client HTTP requests. When these requests arrive the server does whatever is needed to serve the requests by providing the necessary content. Adding a servlet container may somewhat change this behavior. Now the web server needs also to perform the following: Load the servlet container adapter library and initialize it (prior to serving requests). When a request arrives, it needs to check and see if a certain request belongs to a servlet, if so it needs to let the adapter take the request and handle it. The adapter on the other hand needs to know what requests it is going to serve, usually based on some pattern in the request URL, and to where to direct these requests. Is this not correct...or am I misunderstanding it -Original Message- From: Bill Bruns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 12:26 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Allen, do you have the web server configured to throw the requests over to Tomcat? In other words, have either Proxy support or else URL Rewriting turned on in the web server? Otherwise your HTTP requests default to port 80, so they will be eaten by the web server and never reach Tomcat, since Tomcat is listening on ports that the HTTP requests do not come to by default. Have you looked at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/proxy-howto.html - Bill -Original Message- From: Wilson, Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:54 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Okay...that looks similar to the tomcat 4 information I haveis your connector working correctly? -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 6:06 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat My configuration is for tomcat 5: Service name=Catalina Connector acceptCount=100 connectionTimeout=2 disableUploadTimeout=true port=8080 redirectPort=8443 /Connector Connector port=8009 enableLookups=false redirectPort=8443 debug=0 protocol=AJP/1.3 / Engine defaultHost=localhost name=Catalina Host appBase=webapps name=localhost Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=localhost_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ ... ... Wilson, Allen wrote: Here are the lines. Connector className=org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector port=8080 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true redirectPort=8443 acceptCount=100 debug=0 connectionTimeout=2 / !-- Define an AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 -- Connector className=org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Connector port=8009 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 acceptCount=10 debug=0/ Let me know if there is something that is incorrect. -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 4:28 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat You said you can connect through port 8009 through the browser??? The jk protocol is not http, so if the configuration was allright you can't connect through 8009 as http. Maybe the error is at your server.xml... Wilson, Allen wrote: Thanks but this is on a Windows system and will not
Apache http / mod_rewrite / mod_jk
All, The archives show this questions being asked all the time, but with no useful responses. Please let me know if this is a known unresolved or unresolvable issue. All solutions posted anywhere for jsessionid makes Apache go beaindead apparently use a mod_rewrite incantation similar to the following: IfModule mod_rewrite.c RewriteEngine on # Force URLs with a jsessionid to go to Tomcat. Necessary because # Apache doesn't recognise that the semi-colon is special. RewriteRule ^(/.*;jsessionid=.*)$ $1 [T=jserv-servlet] /IfModule While I'm sure this worked out great the people using mod_jserv back in 1997, it does not work for mod_jk. For one thing, it does not even let you specify which worker to use :( Back in the day, Craig responded by pointing to a Tomcat FAQ entry which no longer exists, but presumably had something to do with Apache's mod_rewrite. On the other hand, a solution was posted (and confirmed by some readers) that the following works: JkMount /test/*;jsessionid=* ajp13 This seems very obvious, and there's a caveat about how it might not work on older versions of mod_jk. It apparently does not work for me. I'm using mod_jk (not mod_jk2), version 1.2.5 (current release) on Apache 2.0.48 as a dynamic module on Linux -- everything compiled myself with nothing out of the ordinary. Can anyone offer any advice? I've just been sucking it up and ignoring this problem for a while, now (years). Is there actually a solution out there for this? Am I just mistyping the JkMount configuration? Anyone, please help. Thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Howto run tomcat 4.06 as windows service
Hello, I have an existing tc4 installation (copied in a hurry from another system ;-) which works fine when launched via the startup.bat script. Is there a way to turn it into a proper windows (XP) service? I know tc5 has service.bat, but short of upgrading, what would be the equivalent here? Tia, --bald - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat
Okay...I've read the article and the way it look is that you are doing the connection without using a connector like mod_jk. You are doing it with the proxy module...mod_proxy.so Is that correct If so, then it provides me another method to go but before I start back tracking to do something new..I would like to see if I could get the mod_jk connector working... -Original Message- From: Bill Bruns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:04 PM To: Wilson, Allen; Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Allen, you ask isn't that what the connector is supposed to do, but the connector is in Tomcat, not in your web server. It is the web server software that is monitoring port 80, and that is where your browser sends requests to by default, so the request must get past the web server first. To do that you need to tell the web server where to send them, namely to your Tomcat port. I think this accounts for the behaviour you told about, namely that Tomcat responds fine when you specify the port number in your URL. -Bill -Original Message- From: Wilson, Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 11:32 AM To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Bill..thanks for the reply... I will read through the link you provide but isn't that what the connector is supposed to do. My understanding what that the Apache HTTP server would detect what the request was (Java or not) and pass it on to Tomcat. Is this not what the specification of /portal/* ajp13 in the configuration does. This is what I got from the document at: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk.quickhowto.html Here is a little from one of the pages in that area... ( http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk/aphowto.html ) In a nutshell a web server is waiting for client HTTP requests. When these requests arrive the server does whatever is needed to serve the requests by providing the necessary content. Adding a servlet container may somewhat change this behavior. Now the web server needs also to perform the following: Load the servlet container adapter library and initialize it (prior to serving requests). When a request arrives, it needs to check and see if a certain request belongs to a servlet, if so it needs to let the adapter take the request and handle it. The adapter on the other hand needs to know what requests it is going to serve, usually based on some pattern in the request URL, and to where to direct these requests. Is this not correct...or am I misunderstanding it -Original Message- From: Bill Bruns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 12:26 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Allen, do you have the web server configured to throw the requests over to Tomcat? In other words, have either Proxy support or else URL Rewriting turned on in the web server? Otherwise your HTTP requests default to port 80, so they will be eaten by the web server and never reach Tomcat, since Tomcat is listening on ports that the HTTP requests do not come to by default. Have you looked at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/proxy-howto.html - Bill -Original Message- From: Wilson, Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:54 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Okay...that looks similar to the tomcat 4 information I haveis your connector working correctly? -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 6:06 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat My configuration is for tomcat 5: Service name=Catalina Connector acceptCount=100 connectionTimeout=2 disableUploadTimeout=true port=8080 redirectPort=8443 /Connector Connector port=8009 enableLookups=false redirectPort=8443 debug=0 protocol=AJP/1.3 / Engine defaultHost=localhost name=Catalina Host appBase=webapps name=localhost Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=localhost_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ ... ... Wilson, Allen wrote: Here are the lines. Connector className=org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector port=8080 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true redirectPort=8443 acceptCount=100 debug=0 connectionTimeout=2 / !-- Define an AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 -- Connector className=org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Connector port=8009 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 acceptCount=10 debug=0/ Let me know if there is something that is incorrect. -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:
Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat
Assuming the connector is working, what effect does adding an additional mapping of /portal ajp13 to your existing /portal/* ajp13 mapping have? I just double-checked on our dev box where jk is definitely up. I got a 404 from apache for /mapping but /mapping/stuff got routed through to tomcat. Jon Wilson, Allen wrote: No you are not way off...at least not from my point of view because that is what I thought would work. But unless I specify the port (http://myserver.com:8080/portal) it will not get there... It makes me think that the connector is not function correctly but I do not know how to tell..when I check the running ports I see the 8009 port running but it does not hand to Tomcat -Original Message- From: Jon Wingfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:09 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat I may be way off but... I don't think http://myserver.com/portal maps to /portal/* ajp13 http://myserver.com/portal/ or http://myserver.com/portal/whatever.jsp probably will, though. Give it a go, may work, Jon Wilson, Allen wrote: Bill..thanks for the reply... I will read through the link you provide but isn't that what the connector is supposed to do. My understanding what that the Apache HTTP server would detect what the request was (Java or not) and pass it on to Tomcat. Is this not what the specification of /portal/* ajp13 in the configuration does. This is what I got from the document at: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk.quickhowto.html Here is a little from one of the pages in that area... ( http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk/aphowto.html ) In a nutshell a web server is waiting for client HTTP requests. When these requests arrive the server does whatever is needed to serve the requests by providing the necessary content. Adding a servlet container may somewhat change this behavior. Now the web server needs also to perform the following: Load the servlet container adapter library and initialize it (prior to serving requests). When a request arrives, it needs to check and see if a certain request belongs to a servlet, if so it needs to let the adapter take the request and handle it. The adapter on the other hand needs to know what requests it is going to serve, usually based on some pattern in the request URL, and to where to direct these requests. Is this not correct...or am I misunderstanding it -Original Message- From: Bill Bruns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 12:26 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Allen, do you have the web server configured to throw the requests over to Tomcat? In other words, have either Proxy support or else URL Rewriting turned on in the web server? Otherwise your HTTP requests default to port 80, so they will be eaten by the web server and never reach Tomcat, since Tomcat is listening on ports that the HTTP requests do not come to by default. Have you looked at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/proxy-howto.html - Bill -Original Message- From: Wilson, Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:54 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Okay...that looks similar to the tomcat 4 information I haveis your connector working correctly? -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 6:06 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat My configuration is for tomcat 5: Service name=Catalina Connector acceptCount=100 connectionTimeout=2 disableUploadTimeout=true port=8080 redirectPort=8443 /Connector Connector port=8009 enableLookups=false redirectPort=8443 debug=0 protocol=AJP/1.3 / Engine defaultHost=localhost name=Catalina Host appBase=webapps name=localhost Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=localhost_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ ... ... Wilson, Allen wrote: Here are the lines. Connector className=org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector port=8080 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true redirectPort=8443 acceptCount=100 debug=0 connectionTimeout=2 / !-- Define an AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 -- Connector className=org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Connector port=8009 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 acceptCount=10 debug=0/ Let me know if there is something that is incorrect. -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 4:28 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat You said you can connect through port 8009 through the browser??? The jk protocol is not http, so if
tools.jar classpath
hi everyone, dumb question time. here's winXP and tomcat 5.0.19. after setting up Tomcat as a service it didn't find the tools.jar and couldn't compile my .jsp's. the error page told me to copy tools.jar over from JAVA_HOME/lib/ to TOMCAT_HOME/common/lib and that works. but i don't like it. isn't there a way of telling tomcat or at least this one context the classpath for tools.jar e.g. via web.xml ? thanks, Matthias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat
I think I may have found the problem I tried to add the line AddModule mod_jk.c in the HTTP server config and it gave an error. I could not locate the file within my HTTP or Tomcat installation.even though I have the mod_jk.so file in the libexec directory. -Original Message- From: Jon Wingfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:35 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Assuming the connector is working, what effect does adding an additional mapping of /portal ajp13 to your existing /portal/* ajp13 mapping have? I just double-checked on our dev box where jk is definitely up. I got a 404 from apache for /mapping but /mapping/stuff got routed through to tomcat. Jon Wilson, Allen wrote: No you are not way off...at least not from my point of view because that is what I thought would work. But unless I specify the port (http://myserver.com:8080/portal) it will not get there... It makes me think that the connector is not function correctly but I do not know how to tell..when I check the running ports I see the 8009 port running but it does not hand to Tomcat -Original Message- From: Jon Wingfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:09 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat I may be way off but... I don't think http://myserver.com/portal maps to /portal/* ajp13 http://myserver.com/portal/ or http://myserver.com/portal/whatever.jsp probably will, though. Give it a go, may work, Jon Wilson, Allen wrote: Bill..thanks for the reply... I will read through the link you provide but isn't that what the connector is supposed to do. My understanding what that the Apache HTTP server would detect what the request was (Java or not) and pass it on to Tomcat. Is this not what the specification of /portal/* ajp13 in the configuration does. This is what I got from the document at: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk.quickhowto.html Here is a little from one of the pages in that area... ( http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk/aphowto.html ) In a nutshell a web server is waiting for client HTTP requests. When these requests arrive the server does whatever is needed to serve the requests by providing the necessary content. Adding a servlet container may somewhat change this behavior. Now the web server needs also to perform the following: Load the servlet container adapter library and initialize it (prior to serving requests). When a request arrives, it needs to check and see if a certain request belongs to a servlet, if so it needs to let the adapter take the request and handle it. The adapter on the other hand needs to know what requests it is going to serve, usually based on some pattern in the request URL, and to where to direct these requests. Is this not correct...or am I misunderstanding it -Original Message- From: Bill Bruns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 12:26 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Allen, do you have the web server configured to throw the requests over to Tomcat? In other words, have either Proxy support or else URL Rewriting turned on in the web server? Otherwise your HTTP requests default to port 80, so they will be eaten by the web server and never reach Tomcat, since Tomcat is listening on ports that the HTTP requests do not come to by default. Have you looked at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/proxy-howto.html - Bill -Original Message- From: Wilson, Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:54 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Okay...that looks similar to the tomcat 4 information I haveis your connector working correctly? -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 6:06 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat My configuration is for tomcat 5: Service name=Catalina Connector acceptCount=100 connectionTimeout=2 disableUploadTimeout=true port=8080 redirectPort=8443 /Connector Connector port=8009 enableLookups=false redirectPort=8443 debug=0 protocol=AJP/1.3 / Engine defaultHost=localhost name=Catalina Host appBase=webapps name=localhost Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=localhost_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ ... ... Wilson, Allen wrote: Here are the lines. Connector className=org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector port=8080 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true redirectPort=8443 acceptCount=100 debug=0
RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat
Hi, The rest of this thread aside, are you sure you even need Apache? Do you particular CGI/SSI/PHP scripts you need to serve in a high concurrency environment? What's your expected load? Tomcat standalone might be good enough for your needs, in which case you could drop all this connector stuff. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Bill Bruns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 3:04 PM To: Wilson, Allen; Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Allen, you ask isn't that what the connector is supposed to do, but the connector is in Tomcat, not in your web server. It is the web server software that is monitoring port 80, and that is where your browser sends requests to by default, so the request must get past the web server first. To do that you need to tell the web server where to send them, namely to your Tomcat port. I think this accounts for the behaviour you told about, namely that Tomcat responds fine when you specify the port number in your URL. -Bill -Original Message- From: Wilson, Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 11:32 AM To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Bill..thanks for the reply... I will read through the link you provide but isn't that what the connector is supposed to do. My understanding what that the Apache HTTP server would detect what the request was (Java or not) and pass it on to Tomcat. Is this not what the specification of /portal/* ajp13 in the configuration does. This is what I got from the document at: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk.quickhowto.html Here is a little from one of the pages in that area... ( http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk/aphowto.html ) In a nutshell a web server is waiting for client HTTP requests. When these requests arrive the server does whatever is needed to serve the requests by providing the necessary content. Adding a servlet container may somewhat change this behavior. Now the web server needs also to perform the following: Load the servlet container adapter library and initialize it (prior to serving requests). When a request arrives, it needs to check and see if a certain request belongs to a servlet, if so it needs to let the adapter take the request and handle it. The adapter on the other hand needs to know what requests it is going to serve, usually based on some pattern in the request URL, and to where to direct these requests. Is this not correct...or am I misunderstanding it -Original Message- From: Bill Bruns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 12:26 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Allen, do you have the web server configured to throw the requests over to Tomcat? In other words, have either Proxy support or else URL Rewriting turned on in the web server? Otherwise your HTTP requests default to port 80, so they will be eaten by the web server and never reach Tomcat, since Tomcat is listening on ports that the HTTP requests do not come to by default. Have you looked at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/proxy-howto.html - Bill -Original Message- From: Wilson, Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:54 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Okay...that looks similar to the tomcat 4 information I haveis your connector working correctly? -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 6:06 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat My configuration is for tomcat 5: Service name=Catalina Connector acceptCount=100 connectionTimeout=2 disableUploadTimeout=true port=8080 redirectPort=8443 /Connector Connector port=8009 enableLookups=false redirectPort=8443 debug=0 protocol=AJP/1.3 / Engine defaultHost=localhost name=Catalina Host appBase=webapps name=localhost Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=localhost_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ ... ... Wilson, Allen wrote: Here are the lines. Connector className=org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector port=8080 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true redirectPort=8443 acceptCount=100 debug=0 connectionTimeout=2 / !-- Define an AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 -- Connector className=org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Connector port=8009 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 acceptCount=10 debug=0/ Let me know if there is something that is incorrect. -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06,
RE: Apache http / mod_rewrite / mod_jk
Howdy, I have no clue as to your actual question, but I'm curious: The archives show this questions being asked all the time, but with no How do you define all the time in the statement above? Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat
My reason for the Apache..is that I do not want root to run the Tomcat process once I put the server into production and I saw no other way for Tomcat to run on port 80 without using root.. -Original Message- From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:44 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Hi, The rest of this thread aside, are you sure you even need Apache? Do you particular CGI/SSI/PHP scripts you need to serve in a high concurrency environment? What's your expected load? Tomcat standalone might be good enough for your needs, in which case you could drop all this connector stuff. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Bill Bruns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 3:04 PM To: Wilson, Allen; Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Allen, you ask isn't that what the connector is supposed to do, but the connector is in Tomcat, not in your web server. It is the web server software that is monitoring port 80, and that is where your browser sends requests to by default, so the request must get past the web server first. To do that you need to tell the web server where to send them, namely to your Tomcat port. I think this accounts for the behaviour you told about, namely that Tomcat responds fine when you specify the port number in your URL. -Bill -Original Message- From: Wilson, Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 11:32 AM To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Bill..thanks for the reply... I will read through the link you provide but isn't that what the connector is supposed to do. My understanding what that the Apache HTTP server would detect what the request was (Java or not) and pass it on to Tomcat. Is this not what the specification of /portal/* ajp13 in the configuration does. This is what I got from the document at: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk.quickhowto.html Here is a little from one of the pages in that area... ( http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk/aphowto.html ) In a nutshell a web server is waiting for client HTTP requests. When these requests arrive the server does whatever is needed to serve the requests by providing the necessary content. Adding a servlet container may somewhat change this behavior. Now the web server needs also to perform the following: Load the servlet container adapter library and initialize it (prior to serving requests). When a request arrives, it needs to check and see if a certain request belongs to a servlet, if so it needs to let the adapter take the request and handle it. The adapter on the other hand needs to know what requests it is going to serve, usually based on some pattern in the request URL, and to where to direct these requests. Is this not correct...or am I misunderstanding it -Original Message- From: Bill Bruns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 12:26 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Allen, do you have the web server configured to throw the requests over to Tomcat? In other words, have either Proxy support or else URL Rewriting turned on in the web server? Otherwise your HTTP requests default to port 80, so they will be eaten by the web server and never reach Tomcat, since Tomcat is listening on ports that the HTTP requests do not come to by default. Have you looked at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/proxy-howto.html - Bill -Original Message- From: Wilson, Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:54 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Okay...that looks similar to the tomcat 4 information I haveis your connector working correctly? -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 6:06 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat My configuration is for tomcat 5: Service name=Catalina Connector acceptCount=100 connectionTimeout=2 disableUploadTimeout=true port=8080 redirectPort=8443 /Connector Connector port=8009 enableLookups=false redirectPort=8443 debug=0 protocol=AJP/1.3 / Engine defaultHost=localhost name=Catalina Host appBase=webapps name=localhost Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=localhost_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ ... ... Wilson, Allen wrote: Here are the lines. Connector className=org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector port=8080 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true redirectPort=8443 acceptCount=100 debug=0
Re: Filter.init and DefaultContext JNDI resources
After further testing on my using a JNDI resource in the Filter.init(...) method I found that if I use a DefaultContext to link a resource it fails. eg: DefaultContext ResourceLink name=jdbc/test global=jdbc/db type=javax.sql.DataSource/ /DefaultContext But if I link the resource in a Context I can load a JNDI resource in my Filter's init(...) method. eg: Context path=/JNDI docBase=JNDI.war ResourceLink name=jdbc/test global=jdbc/db type=javax.sql.DataSource/ /Context In both forms of resource linking above the Filter can load the JNDI resource from the doFilter(...) method. Any reasons that there should be a difference in behavior for a ResourceLink depending on if you link it in a DefaultContext or a Context? Sandy PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat
Hi. Can you post the relevant parts of your httpd.conf file? Also, I missed this in the thread if it was mentioned, but what version of Apache are you working with? I ask, because it looks like from my setup that Apache ditched the AddModule directive in Apache 2.0.xx. LoadModule needs to be in your httpd.conf file before the AddModule directive under Apache 1.3.x as in: # All the other LoadModule directive here. LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so # Further down, all the AddModule directives here AddModule mod_jk.c It'd be helpful to see the JkWorkersFile directive, JkMount directive, and the contents of the jk workers file. --David Just tack it on to the end of the list of LoadModule directives. Then use AddModule at the end of the list of AddModule directives. Wilson, Allen wrote: I think I may have found the problem I tried to add the line AddModule mod_jk.c in the HTTP server config and it gave an error. I could not locate the file within my HTTP or Tomcat installation.even though I have the mod_jk.so file in the libexec directory. -Original Message- From: Jon Wingfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:35 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Assuming the connector is working, what effect does adding an additional mapping of /portal ajp13 to your existing /portal/* ajp13 mapping have? I just double-checked on our dev box where jk is definitely up. I got a 404 from apache for /mapping but /mapping/stuff got routed through to tomcat. Jon Wilson, Allen wrote: No you are not way off...at least not from my point of view because that is what I thought would work. But unless I specify the port (http://myserver.com:8080/portal) it will not get there... It makes me think that the connector is not function correctly but I do not know how to tell..when I check the running ports I see the 8009 port running but it does not hand to Tomcat -Original Message- From: Jon Wingfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:09 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat I may be way off but... I don't think http://myserver.com/portal maps to /portal/* ajp13 http://myserver.com/portal/ or http://myserver.com/portal/whatever.jsp probably will, though. Give it a go, may work, Jon Wilson, Allen wrote: Bill..thanks for the reply... I will read through the link you provide but isn't that what the connector is supposed to do. My understanding what that the Apache HTTP server would detect what the request was (Java or not) and pass it on to Tomcat. Is this not what the specification of /portal/* ajp13 in the configuration does. This is what I got from the document at: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk.quickhowto.html Here is a little from one of the pages in that area... ( http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk/aphowto.html ) In a nutshell a web server is waiting for client HTTP requests. When these requests arrive the server does whatever is needed to serve the requests by providing the necessary content. Adding a servlet container may somewhat change this behavior. Now the web server needs also to perform the following: Load the servlet container adapter library and initialize it (prior to serving requests). When a request arrives, it needs to check and see if a certain request belongs to a servlet, if so it needs to let the adapter take the request and handle it. The adapter on the other hand needs to know what requests it is going to serve, usually based on some pattern in the request URL, and to where to direct these requests. Is this not correct...or am I misunderstanding it -Original Message- From: Bill Bruns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 12:26 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Allen, do you have the web server configured to throw the requests over to Tomcat? In other words, have either Proxy support or else URL Rewriting turned on in the web server? Otherwise your HTTP requests default to port 80, so they will be eaten by the web server and never reach Tomcat, since Tomcat is listening on ports that the HTTP requests do not come to by default. Have you looked at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/proxy-howto.html - Bill -Original Message- From: Wilson, Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:54 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Okay...that looks similar to the tomcat 4 information I haveis your connector working correctly? -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 6:06 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and
RE: request.getUserPrincipal();
Hi, how often do you invalidate your sessions? It's hard to imagine your application would expire a user's session right after he logs in. But take a look at the request header to see if the subsequent session ids are the same as the first one. Other than that, without more specific info on how you implemented the authentication, it's hard to figure out what's going on:). -Yan -Original Message- From: Winter, G (Graeme) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 7:46 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: request.getUserPrincipal(); Hi All, I am trying to perform client authentication using certificates, and I have made some progress - the certificates are now accepted as OK, which is nice. Obviously I am using https too... However, the sting is that the methods request.getAuthType(); request.getRemoteUser(); request.getUserPrincipal(); All return NULL, which is contrary to the documentation, since I know the user (i.e. me) has authenticated. clientAuth=true in server.xml. Anyone else out there had this problem, and more to the point found a solution? Cheers, Graeme - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nativeDispatch SEVERE error with apache ErrorDocument on 404 to a servlet
Hey all, I just discovered some things that I googled around and debugged a bit and couldn't find any help on, so I'm posting it to the list so that when I have the problem again, I'll find my own posting via google! Maybe it will help someone else as well. Using: Apache, mod_jk2 tomcat4.1.27 In apache I have ErrorDocument directives that send 404 errors to a servlet. This was supposed to be setup so that I could forward people who make invalid requests to a valid page. Also I could send errors to a log, and give people a nice looking page rather than apache's default. Here's the tricky part: I have mod_jk2 setup to forward *.jsp and certain servlets to tomcat, but graphics and such come through apache. If I have a valid request come in to a jsp page or to a servlet... but there is a gif/png/jpg missing on that page, then strange things begin to happen. Here's some output: Normal output complete from jsp page. Apr 7, 2004 12:53:00 PM org.apache.jk.common.JniHandler nativeDispatch SEVERE: nativeDispatch: error 21000 Apr 7, 2004 12:53:01 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelUn receive SEVERE: receive error: 21000 Apr 7, 2004 12:53:00 PM org.apache.jk.common.JniHandler nativeDispatch SEVERE: nativeDispatch: error 21000 Apr 7, 2004 12:53:01 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelUn receive SEVERE: receive error: 21000 CoyoteAdapter Requested cookie session id is 6480375D001AF672794CA5AEFFAAAF92 ErrorDocument servlet output. That's bad! Apr 7, 2004 12:53:01 PM org.apache.jk.common.JniHandler nativeDispatch SEVERE: nativeDispatch: error -3 Apr 7, 2004 12:53:01 PM org.apache.jk.common.JniHandler nativeDispatch SEVERE: nativeDispatch: error -3 Apr 7, 2004 12:53:01 PM org.apache.jk.common.JniHandler nativeDispatch If you have seen errors such as these in your logs, it may be that you are using an apache ErrorDocument forwarding to tomcat, and really you just have some missing graphics or other files! So now that I figured out what is going on... does anyone have an idea of how to handle this? I really want to send just jsp and servlet type 404 errors to a servlet / JSP, not missing graphic 404 errors. But there is no way to distinguish them on the apache side that I know of... and no way to distinguish them on the tomcat side either. If you look at some of the apache docs they say that they now set some additional CGI variables for this purpose, but I don't think they are accessible from jsp. The variables all start with REDIRECT_ ServletConfig / ServletRequest don't provide a way to get at those variables, right? This is kind of going off topic, but help! Thanks, Daniel Gibby - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat
No a problem...I am using 2.0.48.. I have the LoadModule line and the other directives here...they are LoadModule jk_module /usr/WWW/libexec/mod_jk.so JkWorkersFile /usr/tomcat-4.1.18/conf/jk/workers.properties JkLogFile /usr/tomcat-4.1.18/logs/mod_jk.log JkLogLeveldebug JkMount /portal/* ajp13 I was unable to put in the AddModule line because I did not see it (the mod_jk.c file) loaded when I did the apachectl -l. I am working on getting that loaded now -Original Message- From: David Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 3:19 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Hi. Can you post the relevant parts of your httpd.conf file? Also, I missed this in the thread if it was mentioned, but what version of Apache are you working with? I ask, because it looks like from my setup that Apache ditched the AddModule directive in Apache 2.0.xx. LoadModule needs to be in your httpd.conf file before the AddModule directive under Apache 1.3.x as in: # All the other LoadModule directive here. LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so # Further down, all the AddModule directives here AddModule mod_jk.c It'd be helpful to see the JkWorkersFile directive, JkMount directive, and the contents of the jk workers file. --David Just tack it on to the end of the list of LoadModule directives. Then use AddModule at the end of the list of AddModule directives. Wilson, Allen wrote: I think I may have found the problem I tried to add the line AddModule mod_jk.c in the HTTP server config and it gave an error. I could not locate the file within my HTTP or Tomcat installation.even though I have the mod_jk.so file in the libexec directory. -Original Message- From: Jon Wingfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:35 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Assuming the connector is working, what effect does adding an additional mapping of /portalajp13 to your existing /portal/* ajp13 mapping have? I just double-checked on our dev box where jk is definitely up. I got a 404 from apache for /mapping but /mapping/stuff got routed through to tomcat. Jon Wilson, Allen wrote: No you are not way off...at least not from my point of view because that is what I thought would work. But unless I specify the port (http://myserver.com:8080/portal) it will not get there... It makes me think that the connector is not function correctly but I do not know how to tell..when I check the running ports I see the 8009 port running but it does not hand to Tomcat -Original Message- From: Jon Wingfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:09 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat I may be way off but... I don't think http://myserver.com/portal maps to /portal/* ajp13 http://myserver.com/portal/ or http://myserver.com/portal/whatever.jsp probably will, though. Give it a go, may work, Jon Wilson, Allen wrote: Bill..thanks for the reply... I will read through the link you provide but isn't that what the connector is supposed to do. My understanding what that the Apache HTTP server would detect what the request was (Java or not) and pass it on to Tomcat. Is this not what the specification of /portal/* ajp13 in the configuration does. This is what I got from the document at: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk.quickhowto.htm l Here is a little from one of the pages in that area... ( http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk/aphowto.html ) In a nutshell a web server is waiting for client HTTP requests. When these requests arrive the server does whatever is needed to serve the requests by providing the necessary content. Adding a servlet container may somewhat change this behavior. Now the web server needs also to perform the following: Load the servlet container adapter library and initialize it (prior to serving requests). When a request arrives, it needs to check and see if a certain request belongs to a servlet, if so it needs to let the adapter take the request and handle it. The adapter on the other hand needs to know what requests it is going to serve, usually based on some pattern in the request URL, and to where to direct these requests. Is this not correct...or am I misunderstanding it -Original Message- From: Bill Bruns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 12:26 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Allen, do you have the web server configured to throw the requests over to Tomcat? In other words, have either Proxy support or else URL Rewriting turned on in the web server? Otherwise your HTTP requests default to port 80, so they will be eaten by
Re: Apache http / mod_rewrite / mod_jk
Yoav, I have no clue as to your actual question, but I'm curious: The archives show this questions being asked all the time, but with no How do you define all the time in the statement above? Like this: Dubious responses: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg84808.html http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg74207.html http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg84936.html (references a URL @ Google Groups with a simple solution that does not appear to work for me) References Craig's pointers: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg78826.html No responses: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg75615.html That's just in the tomcat-user archives. Similar discussions occur in other forums (fora?), like jGuru. Do you know if this is supposed to work? JkMount /myapp/*;jsessionid=* workerX It has allegedly worked for some other people. -chris signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat
Hi, My reason for the Apache..is that I do not want root to run the Tomcat process once I put the server into production and I saw no other way for Tomcat to run on port 80 without using root.. Use commons-daemon for this. It ships with tomcat5 and works with tomcat4 as well: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/daemon/index.html. Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Filter.init and DefaultContext JNDI resources
Hi, I think JNDI resources have to be associated with an actual context explicitly, to avoid creating multiple copies. I'm not a big fan of DefaultContext anyways. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Sandy McArthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 4:19 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Filter.init and DefaultContext JNDI resources After further testing on my using a JNDI resource in the Filter.init(...) method I found that if I use a DefaultContext to link a resource it fails. eg: DefaultContext ResourceLink name=jdbc/test global=jdbc/db type=javax.sql.DataSource/ /DefaultContext But if I link the resource in a Context I can load a JNDI resource in my Filter's init(...) method. eg: Context path=/JNDI docBase=JNDI.war ResourceLink name=jdbc/test global=jdbc/db type=javax.sql.DataSource/ /Context In both forms of resource linking above the Filter can load the JNDI resource from the doFilter(...) method. Any reasons that there should be a difference in behavior for a ResourceLink depending on if you link it in a DefaultContext or a Context? Sandy This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Apache http / mod_rewrite / mod_jk
Hi, Like this: snip of links / OK, that's what I figured. I wouldn't call once or twice a year all the time but that's besides the point, as the issue undoubtedly exists ;) Do you know if this is supposed to work? JkMount /myapp/*;jsessionid=* workerX It has allegedly worked for some other people. I don't know if it's supposed to work. Is it difficult to test? Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat
Yes...I think this is a better route to go...I will try it...thanks -Original Message- From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 3:43 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Connecting the HTTP Server and Tomcat Hi, My reason for the Apache..is that I do not want root to run the Tomcat process once I put the server into production and I saw no other way for Tomcat to run on port 80 without using root.. Use commons-daemon for this. It ships with tomcat5 and works with tomcat4 as well: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/daemon/index.html. Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message may contain proprietary or confidential company information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
access ENV variables
Is it possible to access environment variables in tomcat that were set by apache? Specifically the REDIRECT_ * variables that are set by ErrorDocument directives? Then I can have a servlet return the correct content type. i.e. if it is a gif that has a 404 I can redirect to a graphic that says not found But if a jsp page is missing or won't compile, I can redirect to a different jsp. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
