Re: JSP pre-compile and Apache
I have the precompiled JSP's working with Apache now. Thanks. Apart from the first-time-hit compilation penalty on a normal jsp (as apposed to a precompiled one), why would you choose one option above the other? Standard jsp is easier to do updates if you work in an unpacked war setup - you just change the file and it is updated. Precompiled you have to acctually precompile the file. But how about performance and other issues? I guess it depends on your application, but is there somewhere a good checklist to determine when to choose the one option over the other? --- Terence M. Bandoian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you granted the site accessClassInPackage runtime permission? -Terence M. Bandoian [EMAIL PROTECTED] I used to precompile my JSP's (which worked great and was a big time saver in testing), but since running Tomcat 4.1.31 together with Apache, all sorts of weird errors occurred. I remember reading somewhere that Apache expected the actual jsp file, not the compiled version. So I reverted back to *not* precompiling JSP's and everything worked as expected. Question now, obviously there is a first-time-compile penalty per jsp, but once compiled, should performance be the same? How about the overhead to check if the .jsp file indeed matches the compiled version? Has someone managed to get precompiled JSP's running in combination with Apache? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: JSP pre-compile and Apache
Well there is one big advantage when using precompiled JSPs: You're sure that all JSPs are compilable, so you don't get any compile errors on your live site. That gives your application more stability. Bernhard -Ursprngliche Nachricht- Von: Charl Gerber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Juni 2005 08:07 An: Tomcat Users List Betreff: Re: JSP pre-compile and Apache I have the precompiled JSP's working with Apache now. Thanks. Apart from the first-time-hit compilation penalty on a normal jsp (as apposed to a precompiled one), why would you choose one option above the other? Standard jsp is easier to do updates if you work in an unpacked war setup - you just change the file and it is updated. Precompiled you have to acctually precompile the file. But how about performance and other issues? I guess it depends on your application, but is there somewhere a good checklist to determine when to choose the one option over the other? --- Terence M. Bandoian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you granted the site accessClassInPackage runtime permission? -Terence M. Bandoian [EMAIL PROTECTED] I used to precompile my JSP's (which worked great and was a big time saver in testing), but since running Tomcat 4.1.31 together with Apache, all sorts of weird errors occurred. I remember reading somewhere that Apache expected the actual jsp file, not the compiled version. So I reverted back to *not* precompiling JSP's and everything worked as expected. Question now, obviously there is a first-time-compile penalty per jsp, but once compiled, should performance be the same? How about the overhead to check if the .jsp file indeed matches the compiled version? Has someone managed to get precompiled JSP's running in combination with Apache? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk works as localhost only
Have you turned off iptables. /etc/init.d/iptables stop That will kill the firewall rules that is built in to Fedora Core3. Randall -Original Message- From: naidim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 12:41 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: mod_jk works as localhost only I'm running Apache2.0.52 and Tomcat 5.5.9 on FC3. Both work fine locally and remotely. mod_jk is configured but it only works as localhost. Browsing by name or IP fails to find the files in the webapp directory. What do I need to change so it finds them when browseing remotely? Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Admin Package
Caldarale, Charles R wrote: Not to be too facetious, but: 1) Download. 2) Unzip. That's really all there is to it. Just make sure you use the same base directory for the admin unzip that you did for the main Tomcat download. The admin unzip will attempt to overwrite a couple of text files as it goes; the contents are identical, so it doesn't matter. I've still problems and getting the following error: HTTP Status 503 - Servlet admin.login_jsp is currently unavailable type Status report message Servlet admin.login_jsp is currently unavailable description The requested service (Servlet admin.login_jsp is currently unavailable) is not currently available. Apache Tomcat/5.5.9 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AW: JSP pre-compile and Apache
With all due respect, I find that a weak argument. Its pretty dangerous to deploy anything to production without testing it on another (local) environment first. I would never change a jsp on production without checking it on another environment first. Well there is one big advantage when using precompiled JSPs: You're sure that all JSPs are compilable, so you don't get any compile errors on your live site. That gives your application more stability. Bernhard -Ursprngliche Nachricht- Von: Charl Gerber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Juni 2005 08:07 An: Tomcat Users List Betreff: Re: JSP pre-compile and Apache I have the precompiled JSP's working with Apache now. Thanks. Apart from the first-time-hit compilation penalty on a normal jsp (as apposed to a precompiled one), why would you choose one option above the other? Standard jsp is easier to do updates if you work in an unpacked war setup - you just change the file and it is updated. Precompiled you have to acctually precompile the file. But how about performance and other issues? I guess it depends on your application, but is there somewhere a good checklist to determine when to choose the one option over the other? --- Terence M. Bandoian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you granted the site accessClassInPackage runtime permission? -Terence M. Bandoian [EMAIL PROTECTED] I used to precompile my JSP's (which worked great and was a big time saver in testing), but since running Tomcat 4.1.31 together with Apache, all sorts of weird errors occurred. I remember reading somewhere that Apache expected the actual jsp file, not the compiled version. So I reverted back to *not* precompiling JSP's and everything worked as expected. Question now, obviously there is a first-time-compile penalty per jsp, but once compiled, should performance be the same? How about the overhead to check if the .jsp file indeed matches the compiled version? Has someone managed to get precompiled JSP's running in combination with Apache? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Uploading files to another server
Anna Bikkina wrote: Hi, We have an application which uploads files to a machine where tomcat is running. Now we want to change it to upload files to a central server in the network. We were using multipart request to upload the files till now. How can we upload files to a different server than where the tomcat is running. Any suggestions are appreciated. Can you please point me to some examples. Hi Anna. You didn't say if you wanted to change anything besides the final file location, so I'll assume you don't want to change it. Well, it is just a question of how can your Tomcat server reach that new destination. It would be best if it could be done seamlessly, like through a mounted file system. Again, you didn't provide us with details, which OS is running on both of those machines. Anyway, you can use combinations of NFS mounts and SMB mounts, where servers can run Linux or Windows. Nix. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Japanese characters in content-disposition filenames
I have this problem for a while, and drives me crazy. It's very simple: I just want to use Japanese characters (kana and kanji) in the content-disposition HTTP header: response.setHeader(Content-Disposition, inline; filename= + fileName); // filename is a String object Using this I get garbage in IE and Firefox. I checked out the related RFC and it explains that I have to transcode it to B encoding. I've tried this and other hints found over the web, but none of those worked for all the 3 browsers: IE, Firefox and Opera. (The priority is on IE, it's used by the majority of our end-users.) E.g. I've desperately tried: response.setHeader(Content-Disposition, inline; filename= + new String(fileName.getBytes(UTF-8), ISO8859_1)); response.setHeader(Content-Disposition, inline; filename= + fileName.getBytes(iso-2022-jp)); response.setHeader(Content-Disposition, inline; filename= + MimeUtility.encodeWord(fileName, iso-2022-jp, B)); response.setHeader(Content-Disposition, inline; filename= + MimeUtility.encodeWord(new String(fileName.getBytes()), ISO8859_1, B)); response.setHeader(Content-Disposition, inline; filename= + new String(fileName.getBytes(SJIS), ISO8859_1)); Does anyone know the right webcontainer-independent, browser-independent solution? I was writing about Japanese chars, but I guess there should be a universal solution for any (Unicode) char. Thanks a lot in advance. Bye, Aron - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: AW: JSP pre-compile and Apache
It's not that it's not tested. It can happen very easiliy, when you just forgot to check something in the version control: You added a method to a bean, change the JSP, it's working fine in you test environment, you check in the JSP, but forget the bean, do the release and you get the compile error on the live site. That can't happen with precompliation. -Ursprngliche Nachricht- Von: Charl Gerber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Juni 2005 10:28 An: Tomcat Users List Betreff: Re: AW: JSP pre-compile and Apache With all due respect, I find that a weak argument. Its pretty dangerous to deploy anything to production without testing it on another (local) environment first. I would never change a jsp on production without checking it on another environment first. Well there is one big advantage when using precompiled JSPs: You're sure that all JSPs are compilable, so you don't get any compile errors on your live site. That gives your application more stability. Bernhard -Ursprngliche Nachricht- Von: Charl Gerber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Juni 2005 08:07 An: Tomcat Users List Betreff: Re: JSP pre-compile and Apache I have the precompiled JSP's working with Apache now. Thanks. Apart from the first-time-hit compilation penalty on a normal jsp (as apposed to a precompiled one), why would you choose one option above the other? Standard jsp is easier to do updates if you work in an unpacked war setup - you just change the file and it is updated. Precompiled you have to acctually precompile the file. But how about performance and other issues? I guess it depends on your application, but is there somewhere a good checklist to determine when to choose the one option over the other? --- Terence M. Bandoian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you granted the site accessClassInPackage runtime permission? -Terence M. Bandoian [EMAIL PROTECTED] I used to precompile my JSP's (which worked great and was a big time saver in testing), but since running Tomcat 4.1.31 together with Apache, all sorts of weird errors occurred. I remember reading somewhere that Apache expected the actual jsp file, not the compiled version. So I reverted back to *not* precompiling JSP's and everything worked as expected. Question now, obviously there is a first-time-compile penalty per jsp, but once compiled, should performance be the same? How about the overhead to check if the .jsp file indeed matches the compiled version? Has someone managed to get precompiled JSP's running in combination with Apache? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat 5.0 + Apache 2.0 + ErrorDocument
Hi I would like to have Tomcat handle all the error documents, how can I do this? At this stage, whenever there is a page not found, I see an Apache error page. I have already setup mod_jk. I have this: JKMount /*.jsp ajp13 In my web.xml, I have this: error-page error-code404/error-code location/WEB-INF/errors/404.jsp/location /error-page My mod_jk log has the following lines: jk_handler::mod_jk.c (1952): No body with status=404 for worker=ajp13 jk_handler::mod_jk.c (1952): No body with status=404 for worker=ajp13 Somehow I can't see my /WEB-INF/errors/404.jsp when there is a page not found. Thanks, Ben - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: starting a binary by calling a servlet
Excuse me for a moment. Now I have the trouble that I cannot restart Tomcat and so I had to reboot the whole system. Now tomcat start while the bootprocess but cannot be accessed over the browser. And I don't have a process called catalina nor tomcat !?!?! Gruss Christian Im now back again. Now I have time to fix the tomcat-problem. But first I have another problem: I cannot start tomcat!!! I got this from my latest logfile: catalina_2005-06-17.log This is of course only a small part of it. Is this caused by a mistaken entry in the catalina.policy? [quote] Using Security Manager Created MBeanServer with ID: 4aa0ce:10489ba2bdb:-8000:gandalf:1 Jun 17, 2005 11:56:17 AM org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol init INFO: Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8180 Jun 17, 2005 11:56:17 AM org.apache.commons.digester.Digester fatalError SEVERE: Parse Fatal Error at line 1 column 1: Content is not allowed in prolog. org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Content is not allowed in prolog. at org.apache.xerces.u. [/quote] But the weired thing is, my own entry into the catalina.policy is gone, is erased!!! And this happens everytime I reboot my system. Each time I edit the cataline.policy I cannot restart tomcat again. So I choose the windows(tm) solution and reboot the whole system! But when the system is up and running again. Tomcat cannot start at all. AND my entry in the catalina.policy is gone Gruss Christian -- Christian Stalp Institut fr Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informatik Johannes-Gutenberg-Universitt Mainz Tel.: 06131 / 17-3107 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: starting a binary by calling a servlet
Am Freitag, 17. Juni 2005 14:56 schrieb Christian Stalp: Please don't CC me. I'm reading the list and have set the Reply-To for a reason. Thanks. Im now back again. Now I have time to fix the tomcat-problem. But first I have another problem: I cannot start tomcat!!! I got this from my latest logfile: catalina_2005-06-17.log This is of course only a small part of it. Is this caused by a mistaken entry in the catalina.policy? [quote] Using Security Manager Created MBeanServer with ID: 4aa0ce:10489ba2bdb:-8000:gandalf:1 Jun 17, 2005 11:56:17 AM org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol init INFO: Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8180 Jun 17, 2005 11:56:17 AM org.apache.commons.digester.Digester fatalError SEVERE: Parse Fatal Error at line 1 column 1: Content is not allowed in prolog. org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Content is not allowed in prolog. at org.apache.xerces.u. [/quote] I doubt this has anything to do with catalina.policy. This seems to be an error thrown by the XML parser - but catalina.polica is plain-text file. Check the XML config files and context descriptors. Maybe there's something wrong with them - for example byte order marks at the beginning of the file (i. e. before the ?xml version... line). But the weired thing is, my own entry into the catalina.policy is gone, is erased!!! And this happens everytime I reboot my system. Each time I edit the cataline.policy I cannot restart tomcat again. So I choose the windows(tm) solution and reboot the whole system! But when the system is up and running again. Tomcat cannot start at all. AND my entry in the catalina.policy is gone Can't help you with that. Your system seems to behave a bit - hm - strange. I doubt that tomcat is removing entries from catalina.policy. Regards mks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat on Solaris 10
Hi, Has anyone got Tomcat running on Solaris 10? Your responses will be appreciated. Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Uploading files to another server
sorry for the incomplete information. We are using solaris OS. The reason we want to have the files uploaded to a different box is because the server is sometimes maxxed up on connections and so we wanted to have a fail over server. If server1 fails over to server2 all files uploaded on server2 will be on a different box than the once on server1. We have a different webapp which access these files(since some files are on server1 and server2 it is impossible to keep track) so we wanted to have a central server and have all files from both the servers uploaded to that server. On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 02:35, Nikola Milutinovic wrote: Anna Bikkina wrote: Hi, We have an application which uploads files to a machine where tomcat is running. Now we want to change it to upload files to a central server in the network. We were using multipart request to upload the files till now. How can we upload files to a different server than where the tomcat is running. Any suggestions are appreciated. Can you please point me to some examples. Hi Anna. You didn't say if you wanted to change anything besides the final file location, so I'll assume you don't want to change it. Well, it is just a question of how can your Tomcat server reach that new destination. It would be best if it could be done seamlessly, like through a mounted file system. Again, you didn't provide us with details, which OS is running on both of those machines. Anyway, you can use combinations of NFS mounts and SMB mounts, where servers can run Linux or Windows. Nix. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat on Solaris 10
I have already running Tomcat in Solaris 10. -Mensaje original- De: Sunil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: viernes, 17 de junio de 2005 5:40 Para: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Asunto: Tomcat on Solaris 10 Hi, Has anyone got Tomcat running on Solaris 10? Your responses will be appreciated. Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk works as localhost only
Guru suggested it was my server.xml. I had Host name=localhost
appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true
autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false
So I changed Host from localhost to flex.homelinux.org and it works as
flex.homelinux.org, but not as localhost now, and still not by IP.
After a default install of FC3 with httpd, here are the changes I made:
Configure Apache
13 Jun 05
Edit /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
Change ServerAdmin to [email]
Uncomment #ServerName and change host to flex.homelinux.org:80
Verify ServerRoot /etc/httpd
Verify DocumentRoot /var/www/html
Change UseCanonicalName from Off to On
Restart httpd service
Configure Apache for CGI
13 Jun 05
Edit /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
Change Options Indexes FollowSymLings to Options Indexes Includes
FollowSymLinks SymLinksifOwnerMatch ExecCGI Multiviews
Change Allow Override None to Allow Override Options Fileinfo
AuthConfig Limit
Restart httpd service
Change DirectoryIndex index.html index.html.var to DirectoryIndex
index.html index.html.var index.shtml index.cgi index.php index.php3
index.phtml index.htm
Under AddType application/x-gzip .gz .tgz
Add:
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php .php3 .html .htm
.shtml .phps .fds
Uncoment AddHandler cgi-script .cgi
Add .pl to the end of the line
Restart httpd service
Install Tomcat
13 Jun 05
Download jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9.tar.gz and
jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9-admin.tar.gz from
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-5.cgi
#tar xvzf jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9.tar.gz
#tar xvzf jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9-admin.tar.gz
#mv jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9 /usr/java
Edit /etc/profile
Add:
CATALINA_HOME=/usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9
export CATALINA_HOME
#/usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9/bin/startup.sh
Browse to localhost:8080
Open Port 8080 for Tomcat
13 Jun 05
Applications-System Settings-Security Level
Add port 8080:tcp
Autostart Tomcat
#cp /usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9/bin/catalina.sh /etc/init.d/catalina
Edit /etc/init.d/catalina
Add as the last comments at the top
# chkconfig: - 90 15
# description: Jakarta Tomcat Java Servlets and JSP server
Add immediately after the top comments
CATALINA_HOME=/usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9
JAVA_HOME=/usr/java/jdk1.5.0_03
status() {
ps ax --width=1000 | grep
[o]rg.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap start | awk '{printf $1
}' | wc | awk '{print $2}' /tmp/tomcat_process_count.txt
read line /tmp/tomcat_process_count.txt
if [ $line -gt 0 ]; then
echo -n Tomcat ( pid
ps ax --width=1000 | grep
[o]rg.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap start | awk '{printf $1
}'
echo -n ) is running...
echo
else
echo Tomcat is stopped
fi
}
Comment out [ -z $CATALINA_HOME ] CATALINA_HOME=`cd
$PROGDIR/.. ; pwd`
Before echo Using CATALINA_BASE: $CATALINA_BASE add
if [ $1 != status ] ; then
After the echo block add fi
Add immediately before else for if [ $1 = debug ] block
elif [ $1 = status ] ; then
status
elif [ $1 = restart ] ; then
$0 stop
$0 start
Add catalina as a service and turn it on
# chkconfig --add catalina
# chkconfig catalina on
Install mod_jk for Apache/Tomcat connection
Download mod_jk-ap20-1.2.10-1jpp.i386.rpm from
http://www.jpackage.org/rpm.php?id=2456
# rpm -ivh mod_jk-ap20-1.2.10-1jpp.i386.rpm
Configure worker.properties for Apache/Tomcat connection
Edit /usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9/conf/worker.properties
Change workers.tomcat_home=/var/tomcat3 to /usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9
Change workers.java_home=/opt/IBMJava2-13 to /usr/java/jdk1.5.0_03
Change worker.list=ajp12, ajp13 to worker.list=ajp13
Comment out all worker.ajp12 lines
Uncomment worker.ajp13.cachesize and add =20
Change worker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers=ajp12, ajp13 to just ajp13
Configure server.xml for Apache/Tomcat connection
Edit /usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9/conf/server.xml
Below the line Server port=8005 add
Listener className=org.apache.jk.config.ApacheConfig
modJk=/usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_jk.so
workersConfig=/usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9/conf/workers.properties
jkLog=/usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9/logs/mod_jk.log
jkDebug=info/
Below the line Host name=localhost appBase=webapps
unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false
xmlNamespaceAware=false add
Listener
RE: Tomcat on Solaris 10
Hi Has anyone got Tomcat running on Solaris 10? Your responses will be appreciated. Tomcat is packaged by blastwave.org and is working fine under solaris 10. Kind regards, William - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SSL keystore with more than one key entry - which alias is used?
If the keystore that Tomcat uses contains more than one entry where Entry type = keyEntry, how does Tomcat choose which one to use when sending a certificate to the client? It seems as though the alias name is not significant - any alias will do. After some experimenting it seems it uses the first one found. Is this correct? Or is some other method used? Thanks for your time. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk works as localhost only
Host name=localhost
appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true
autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false
Aliaslocalhost/Alias
Aliaswww/Alias
Alias10.0.0.10/Alias
First of all please read the documents of how to install things ...
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk2/vhosthowto.html
- Original Message -
From: naidim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: mod_jk works as localhost only
Guru suggested it was my server.xml. I had Host name=localhost
appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true
autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false
So I changed Host from localhost to flex.homelinux.org and it works as
flex.homelinux.org, but not as localhost now, and still not by IP.
After a default install of FC3 with httpd, here are the changes I made:
Configure Apache
13 Jun 05
Edit /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
Change ServerAdmin to [email]
Uncomment #ServerName and change host to flex.homelinux.org:80
Verify ServerRoot /etc/httpd
Verify DocumentRoot /var/www/html
Change UseCanonicalName from Off to On
Restart httpd service
Configure Apache for CGI
13 Jun 05
Edit /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
Change Options Indexes FollowSymLings to Options Indexes Includes
FollowSymLinks SymLinksifOwnerMatch ExecCGI Multiviews
Change Allow Override None to Allow Override Options Fileinfo
AuthConfig Limit
Restart httpd service
Change DirectoryIndex index.html index.html.var to DirectoryIndex
index.html index.html.var index.shtml index.cgi index.php index.php3
index.phtml index.htm
Under AddType application/x-gzip .gz .tgz
Add:
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php .php3 .html .htm
.shtml .phps .fds
Uncoment AddHandler cgi-script .cgi
Add .pl to the end of the line
Restart httpd service
Install Tomcat
13 Jun 05
Download jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9.tar.gz and
jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9-admin.tar.gz from
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-5.cgi
#tar xvzf jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9.tar.gz
#tar xvzf jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9-admin.tar.gz
#mv jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9 /usr/java
Edit /etc/profile
Add:
CATALINA_HOME=/usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9
export CATALINA_HOME
#/usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9/bin/startup.sh
Browse to localhost:8080
Open Port 8080 for Tomcat
13 Jun 05
Applications-System Settings-Security Level
Add port 8080:tcp
Autostart Tomcat
#cp /usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9/bin/catalina.sh
/etc/init.d/catalina
Edit /etc/init.d/catalina
Add as the last comments at the top
# chkconfig: - 90 15
# description: Jakarta Tomcat Java Servlets and JSP server
Add immediately after the top comments
CATALINA_HOME=/usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9
JAVA_HOME=/usr/java/jdk1.5.0_03
status() {
ps ax --width=1000 | grep
[o]rg.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap start | awk '{printf $1
}' | wc | awk '{print $2}' /tmp/tomcat_process_count.txt
read line /tmp/tomcat_process_count.txt
if [ $line -gt 0 ]; then
echo -n Tomcat ( pid
ps ax --width=1000 | grep
[o]rg.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap start | awk '{printf $1
}'
echo -n ) is running...
echo
else
echo Tomcat is stopped
fi
}
Comment out [ -z $CATALINA_HOME ] CATALINA_HOME=`cd
$PROGDIR/.. ; pwd`
Before echo Using CATALINA_BASE: $CATALINA_BASE add
if [ $1 != status ] ; then
After the echo block add fi
Add immediately before else for if [ $1 = debug ] block
elif [ $1 = status ] ; then
status
elif [ $1 = restart ] ; then
$0 stop
$0 start
Add catalina as a service and turn it on
# chkconfig --add catalina
# chkconfig catalina on
Install mod_jk for Apache/Tomcat connection
Download mod_jk-ap20-1.2.10-1jpp.i386.rpm from
http://www.jpackage.org/rpm.php?id=2456
# rpm -ivh mod_jk-ap20-1.2.10-1jpp.i386.rpm
Configure worker.properties for Apache/Tomcat connection
Edit /usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9/conf/worker.properties
Change workers.tomcat_home=/var/tomcat3 to
/usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9
Change workers.java_home=/opt/IBMJava2-13 to /usr/java/jdk1.5.0_03
Change worker.list=ajp12, ajp13 to worker.list=ajp13
Comment out all worker.ajp12 lines
Uncomment worker.ajp13.cachesize and add =20
Change worker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers=ajp12, ajp13 to just
ajp13
Configure server.xml for
Re: Container Managed Security and mod_jk/Static Contents
how do you authenticate ? basic ? form based ? - Original Message - From: Torsten Rmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 11:42 PM Subject: Container Managed Security and mod_jk/Static Contents Hello! In order to improve performance for static contents I have setup Apache with mod_jk. Now only Struts' *.do requests are served by Tomcat, the rest is done by Apache. Works fine. Now I want to restrict access to some resources using using container managed security. That also works fine, but, and that is now my question: I also want to protect static contents, but that won't work with container managed security, because these requests are handled by Apache and don't even make it to Tomcat. Of course I could just mount the contents to be protected to Tomcat, but then I'll lose the performance advantage of having them served by Apache. Do I have to live with that or do I have a stupid setup? Torsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How can I using Jasper 2 JSP Engine back-compile the java file to jsp file?
I deleted all my project files by misoperation. Using the FinalDate+GoogleDesktop makes all java and xml files back. But some jsp ... ;-( Thanks In Advance
Re: Container Managed Security and mod_jk/Static Contents
Sorry, should have mentioned that. Using form based authentication. Gurumoorthy schrieb: how do you authenticate ? basic ? form based ? - Original Message - From: Torsten Rmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 11:42 PM Subject: Container Managed Security and mod_jk/Static Contents Hello! In order to improve performance for static contents I have setup Apache with mod_jk. Now only Struts' *.do requests are served by Tomcat, the rest is done by Apache. Works fine. Now I want to restrict access to some resources using using container managed security. That also works fine, but, and that is now my question: I also want to protect static contents, but that won't work with container managed security, because these requests are handled by Apache and don't even make it to Tomcat. Of course I could just mount the contents to be protected to Tomcat, but then I'll lose the performance advantage of having them served by Apache. Do I have to live with that or do I have a stupid setup? Torsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
configuration question : the number of connections could be supported by a connector in Tomcat 5.0
I like to get some help on how to configure the maximum number of connections could be supported by Tomcat5.0. There is one config attribute called maxThreads, according to Tomcat doc, which isThe maximum number of request processing threads to be created by this Connector, which therefore determines the maximum number of simultaneous requests that can be handled. . My question comes from the fact that there might be multiple HTTP requests pipelined in each HTTP/1.1 connections, so can we still treat the maxThread as the maxConnections. Thanks in advance, Feng - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SSL keystore with more than one key entry - which alias is used?
John Ryan-Brown wrote: If the keystore that Tomcat uses contains more than one entry where Entry type = keyEntry, how does Tomcat choose which one to use when sending a certificate to the client? Dunno but there is an undocumented Connector attribute keyAlias=myalias which works with 5.5.9 and which means you (probably) don't need an answer to your question Paul Singleton PS don't believe rumours that it always offers the cert with alias 'tomcat' -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.7/20 - Release Date: 16/Jun/2005 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5.0 + Apache 2.0 + ErrorDocument
in your Apache PUT ErrorDocument 400 /errors/404.jsp ErrorDocument 500 /errors/500.jsp And move /errors/404.jsp and /errors/404.jsp to the context path .. .not in WEB-INF as apache wont be able to see the code in WeB-INF ( UNLESS YOU ALIAS IT WHICH I DONT THINK IS A GOOD IDEA ) Any Doubts ? Give me a shout ... - Original Message - From: Ben [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 1:39 PM Subject: Tomcat 5.0 + Apache 2.0 + ErrorDocument Hi I would like to have Tomcat handle all the error documents, how can I do this? At this stage, whenever there is a page not found, I see an Apache error page. I have already setup mod_jk. I have this: JKMount /*.jsp ajp13 In my web.xml, I have this: error-page error-code404/error-code location/WEB-INF/errors/404.jsp/location /error-page My mod_jk log has the following lines: jk_handler::mod_jk.c (1952): No body with status=404 for worker=ajp13 jk_handler::mod_jk.c (1952): No body with status=404 for worker=ajp13 Somehow I can't see my /WEB-INF/errors/404.jsp when there is a page not found. Thanks, Ben - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
monitoring performance
Hi: Is it possible to instruemnt Tomcat to collect statistics such as averasge response time (for each servlet), etc and then somehow get these statistics programatically (e.g., using an API). I'm trying to write a program that needs to get such statistics, therefore monitoring tools that report the statistics graphically are not suitable for me. Thanks, Hossein - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: monitoring performance
you can easily setup JMeter to monitor tomcat and save the results to a log. peter lin On 6/17/05, Hossein S. Attar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi: Is it possible to instruemnt Tomcat to collect statistics such as averasge response time (for each servlet), etc and then somehow get these statistics programatically (e.g., using an API). I'm trying to write a program that needs to get such statistics, therefore monitoring tools that report the statistics graphically are not suitable for me. Thanks, Hossein - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JSP including servlet output
Hey all... I have a situation where I want to use a jsp:include whos target is actually a servlet... Problem is, in the servlet I do: ServletOutputStream out = response.getOutputStream(); out.println(items.getItem()); ...which yields: java.lang.IllegalStateException org.apache.jasper.runtime.ServletResponseWrapperInclude.getOutputStream(ServletResponseWrapperInclude.java:62) Commenting out those two lines gets rid of the exception. If I call the servlet directly on its own I get my expected result, so I know the servlet itself works. I'm assuming this is some sort of limitation of the include mechanism, question is, can it be overcome? I added flush=true to the include tag, which gets rid of the exception but makes the resultant page end where the include is, so that's not the answer. An ideas? Is this something that can be done in the first place? If so, how does one overcome this problem? TIA! -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JSP including servlet output
Never mind, got it... changed: ServletOutputStream out = response.getOutputStream(); ..to... PrintWriter out = response.getWriter(); ...and it now works. I wouldn't mind an explanation though :) -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com On Fri, June 17, 2005 2:02 pm, Frank W. Zammetti said: Hey all... I have a situation where I want to use a jsp:include whos target is actually a servlet... Problem is, in the servlet I do: ServletOutputStream out = response.getOutputStream(); out.println(items.getItem()); ...which yields: java.lang.IllegalStateException org.apache.jasper.runtime.ServletResponseWrapperInclude.getOutputStream(ServletResponseWrapperInclude.java:62) Commenting out those two lines gets rid of the exception. If I call the servlet directly on its own I get my expected result, so I know the servlet itself works. I'm assuming this is some sort of limitation of the include mechanism, question is, can it be overcome? I added flush=true to the include tag, which gets rid of the exception but makes the resultant page end where the include is, so that's not the answer. An ideas? Is this something that can be done in the first place? If so, how does one overcome this problem? TIA! -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: JSP including servlet output
Not a full explanation, but the Javadoc for ServletResponse.getOutputStream() does say: Throws: java.lang.IllegalStateException - if the getWriter method has been called on this response Conversely, getWriter() says: Throws: java.lang.IllegalStateException - if the getOutputStream method has already been called for this response object It'd seem that the Writer had already been acquired. Jay | Jay Burgess [Vertical Technology Group] | Essential Technology Links via RSS | http://www.vtgroup.com/ -Original Message- From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 1:21 PM To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: JSP including servlet output Never mind, got it... changed: ServletOutputStream out = response.getOutputStream(); ..to... PrintWriter out = response.getWriter(); ...and it now works. I wouldn't mind an explanation though :) -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com On Fri, June 17, 2005 2:02 pm, Frank W. Zammetti said: Hey all... I have a situation where I want to use a jsp:include whos target is actually a servlet... Problem is, in the servlet I do: ServletOutputStream out = response.getOutputStream(); out.println(items.getItem()); ...which yields: java.lang.IllegalStateException org.apache.jasper.runtime.ServletResponseWrapperInclude.getOutputStream(ServletResponseWrapperInclude.java:62) Commenting out those two lines gets rid of the exception. If I call the servlet directly on its own I get my expected result, so I know the servlet itself works. I'm assuming this is some sort of limitation of the include mechanism, question is, can it be overcome? I added flush=true to the include tag, which gets rid of the exception but makes the resultant page end where the include is, so that's not the answer. An ideas? Is this something that can be done in the first place? If so, how does one overcome this problem? TIA! -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rc3.d startup scripts
I am trying to create a startup script for Solaris for both Tomcat 5.5.9 and Apache 2.0.52. Can anyone tell me how to do that, so that when the box is rebooted it automatically starts Tomcat and Apache. Thank you for your help. This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk works as localhost only
Is it possible for you to send us your mod_jk configuration along with your workers.properties(if you have one)? Randall -Original Message- From: naidim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 12:41 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: mod_jk works as localhost only I'm running Apache2.0.52 and Tomcat 5.5.9 on FC3. Both work fine locally and remotely. mod_jk is configured but it only works as localhost. Browsing by name or IP fails to find the files in the webapp directory. What do I need to change so it finds them when browseing remotely? Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tomcat is not updating changes in server folders
Hi, I'm having this problem in netbeans tomcat 5.0 on windows 2000 running in local machine: server is not updating the changes in server folders when I upload a file or when I simply copy directly to the folder, so I can not access these files via web until I restart server. thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: isRequestedSessionIdFromURL() returns false
I already tried it, and it did not work. Session ID is separated by
semicolon, not by question mark or ampersand. It is treated
differently and is not shown as URL parameter.
Thanks anyway.
On 6/16/05, Jon Wingfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something like this maybe:
String url = request.getRequestURL().toString();
if (url.indexOf(jsessionid)-1
url.indexOf(request.getRequestedSessionId())-1) {
// do redirect
}
Jon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JSP including servlet output
Yeah, I saw those notes too... I found them a tad confusing :) I would have thought it was the OutputStream that was already gotten, contrary to what the note says... If it was the PrintWriter that was already gotten, then why was the solution to call getWriter() instead? I get the feeling those notes are actually backwatds because as they are it doesn't make sense to me. Or something else entirely is going on. That's the problem for me... if I don't really understand what was wrong, and why the fix is what it was, I can't be sure this code will work in all cases going forward, and that worries me since it is part of a generic package. Frank Jay Burgess wrote: Not a full explanation, but the Javadoc for ServletResponse.getOutputStream() does say: Throws: java.lang.IllegalStateException - if the getWriter method has been called on this response Conversely, getWriter() says: Throws: java.lang.IllegalStateException - if the getOutputStream method has already been called for this response object It'd seem that the Writer had already been acquired. Jay | Jay Burgess [Vertical Technology Group] | Essential Technology Links via RSS | http://www.vtgroup.com/ -Original Message- From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 1:21 PM To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: JSP including servlet output Never mind, got it... changed: ServletOutputStream out = response.getOutputStream(); ..to... PrintWriter out = response.getWriter(); ...and it now works. I wouldn't mind an explanation though :) -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: monitoring performance
Thanks for the reply. I set up JMeter using an example from the JMeter site (http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/usermanual/build-monitor-test-plan.html) . Apparently JMeter uses manager/status and shows only load, # of threads, and memory used. Is it possible to make it measure average response time (both total average response time and per-servlet average response time)? Thanks, Hossein -Original Message- From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 5:18 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: monitoring performance you can easily setup JMeter to monitor tomcat and save the results to a log. peter lin On 6/17/05, Hossein S. Attar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi: Is it possible to instruemnt Tomcat to collect statistics such as averasge response time (for each servlet), etc and then somehow get these statistics programatically (e.g., using an API). I'm trying to write a program that needs to get such statistics, therefore monitoring tools that report the statistics graphically are not suitable for me. Thanks, Hossein - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat is not updating changes in server folders
Hi, 18Jun2005 @ 01:28 megacosmic thusly spake I'm having this problem in netbeans tomcat 5.0 on windows 2000 running in local machine: server is not updating the changes in server folders when I upload a file or when I simply copy directly to the folder, so I can not access these files via web until I restart server. have you modified your build.xml file in netbeans to copy the .war to tomcat when you rebuild? kr, Luke -- ._.. .| .| |.|/.|_ . .|__.|_|.|\.|_ . :61 421 276 282: - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Rc3.d startup scripts
For Apache 2.0.52, unless you need SSL, you can do worse than: ln -s /usr/local/apache2/bin/apachectl S35apache If you don't mind running as root, you can do the same thing for Tomcat: ln -s /path/to/tomcat/bin/catalina.sh S34tomcat If you are using jsvc, then the Tomcat5.sh script that ships with it is meant to be the start of an rcx.d script. Even if you're not using jsvc, you could always unpack the distro and look at the script as a pattern to start from. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I am trying to create a startup script for Solaris for both Tomcat 5.5.9 and Apache 2.0.52. Can anyone tell me how to do that, so that when the box is rebooted it automatically starts Tomcat and Apache. Thank you for your help. This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: configuration question : the number of connections could be supported by a connector in Tomcat 5.0
If you are fronting with Apache, then the mapping between connections and threads is more a function of your MPM. As a result, I'm just going to answer for the stand-alone Connector. In Tomcat 5.0, there is a one-to-one mapping between socket connections and threads. Pipelined HTTP/1.1 keep-alive connections will all use the same thread to process. In 5.5.10+ this will no longer necessarily be the case. It will be possible for Tomcat to handle many (and the value of 'many' is heavily dependent on what your app does :) more socket connections than the configured maxThreads. Feng Xie (fxie) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I like to get some help on how to configure the maximum number of connections could be supported by Tomcat5.0. There is one config attribute called maxThreads, according to Tomcat doc, which isThe maximum number of request processing threads to be created by this Connector, which therefore determines the maximum number of simultaneous requests that can be handled. . My question comes from the fact that there might be multiple HTTP requests pipelined in each HTTP/1.1 connections, so can we still treat the maxThread as the maxConnections. Thanks in advance, Feng - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 3.2.3 / JDK 1.4.2_04-b05
Samit Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, Can somebody help me find out how my tomcat is dying. As far as I know it's not triggered by any url access or memory leak or stack overflow. It dies on it's own( I guess). Is there any kind of hook I can provide that will tell me when it dies? If this subject is already covered , please atleat point me there. Well, as I remember, tomcat dying on 3.2.3 was one of it's major features ;-). This was one of the major reasons for the re-designs in both TC 3.3.x and TC 4.x. Unless you think that you look distinguished after pulling all of your hair out, I'd strongly suggest upgrading ;-). Thanks, Samit - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
