RE: tomcat CPU utilization pegged...total CPU only 50%
-Original Message- From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 10:04 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: tomcat CPU utilization pegged...total CPU only 50% [bcc][faked-from][bayes] Importance: Low From: Kevin Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: tomcat CPU utilization pegged...total CPU only 50% The two Xeon CPU's are hyperthreaded to represent 4 CPU's on the machine. I'm not sure exactly how tomcat/java interact with this, but it was not favorable. Other than for determining the number of threads to use for parallel GC, the JVM does not care how many CPUs there are. I don't know what Windows returns for the number of CPUs installed when hyperthreading is enabled, but you can determine that with the Runtime.availableProcessors() method. You really should be measuring performance by some measurement of actual workload completed, not CPU utilization. Turning off hyperthreading may actually reduce your overall throughput. (Then again, it might make it better - very application dependent.) You're right. I was measuring average response time. The CPU was just the bottleneck. My average response time under a specified user load actually decreased with hyperthreading off. My next step is to start analyzing the code:) Thanks for the pointer! Kevin Williams - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tomcat CPU utilization pegged...total CPU only 50%
Ok, Thanks all for the help. I further optimized the environment while troubleshooting. In case anyone else is in a similar issue, I'll list the solution that worked for me--turn off hyperthreading. The two Xeon CPU's are hyperthreaded to represent 4 CPU's on the machine. I'm not sure exactly how tomcat/java interact with this, but it was not favorable. A coworker mentioned that the windows performance monitor often records total CPU utilization incorrectly due to the logical split of the CPU's acting as 4 instead of 2. Disabling the hyperthreading in the system bios shot the CPU utilization up to 70%-90% (I imagine the other 10% of CPU is being reserved by other applications). Thanks again for the help, Kevin Williams -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vic Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 9:09 PM To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: tomcat CPU utilization pegged...total CPU only 50% [bcc][faked-from][bayes] Importance: Low You could be DB bound or LAN bound. What is the switch telling you LAN utilization is? What is the DB stress test telling you? .V Kevin Williams wrote: Hello, I am trying to performance test an application running Tomcat with Apache w/SSL (connected using mod_proxy). The OS is Windows Server 2003. The test I am running is simulating a user logging into the application (using JMeter for the testing framework). Increasing the number of users from 1, 2, 3, 4,5 the total CPU utilization jumps considerably. After 5 users the CPU utilization hits 50% for a second and then drops...When simulating 10 users, the CPU hits50% for a few seconds and drops back down, the more users, the longer the CPU is pegged at 50%. My question is why is tomcat only using 50% of the CPU? Seeing the CPU grow significantly with each user, and then peg out for longer periods of time with an increased user load indicates that the CPU is the choke point. Using performance monitor, the Tomcat % Processor Time pegs out at 100% for the duration that total CPU utilization is at 50%. Is there a configuration option that I am unaware of to allow tomcat to use more CPU? Thanks in advance! Kevin -- Forums, Boards, Blogs and News in RiA http://www.boardVU.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tomcat CPU utilization pegged...total CPU only 50%
Ok, I've done some more digging and am still stumped. I don't think it's a garbage collector. The machine runs on 2 Gigs of Ram. I set the -Xmx and -Xms value to 1024m and the younger generation values as -XX:NewSize=386m -XX:MaxNewSize=386m -XX:SurvivorRatio=4. Watching the system in task manager, the memory used doesn't exceed 300Mb. Which leads me to believe that it's not gc. The 2 cpu's are 2 Xeon 3.20 Processors (incorrectly stated 3.06 before I believe). Talking with the developer, he thinks that it's hovering around 50% because of hyperthreading. I've watched it go up to 80% (during the first run it peaks there briefly before settling in to the standard 45%-55% range, so I don't think that's the issue. I was thinking maybe it's a database issue, but if that was the case, wouldn't the tomcat processor percent drop off while waiting for the db response? Or could this be from using connections? Also, I noticed that the thread count for the tomcat process is 44. I couldn't pass that no matter what I tried. Does this mean anything? How can I get more than 44 threads running? Thanks in advance for any help on this frustrating problem! Kevin Williams -Original Message- From: Kevin Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 10:48 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: tomcat CPU utilization pegged...total CPU only 50% [bcc][faked-from][bayes] Importance: Low Charles, My client has installed two instances of tomcat (each as a service). I'm not really sure how they did it (they have the standard C:/Program Files/Apache Group/Tomcat 4.1 folder, but the apps and conf files are in D:/instances/instance1/conf, D:/instances/instance1/app, D:/instances/instance1/work, D:/instances/instance1/log). I'll talk to the guy who configured this so I can emulate one of the instances in batch mode. I'll let you know how it goes after I make the changes! Kevin -Original Message- From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 10:00 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: tomcat CPU utilization pegged...total CPU only 50% [bcc][faked-from] Importance: Low From: Kevin Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: tomcat CPU utilization pegged...total CPU only 50% 1. Yes, tomcat is running as a service. You might want to shutdown that service and run it from a command-line window, at least for testing purposes. Easier to fiddle with heap size options and the like. 2. I am not aware of any CPU affinity settings. They won't show up in Task Manager. Not sure if the plain Windows Server supports affinity; my experience with that capability was on a 32-CPU Advanced (Enterprise?) Server system which I no longer have access to. There's an mmc plug in Admin Tools that lets you play with associating processes with CPUs, if it's available in your OS. 3. I'm not sure what options are set with the jvm (I didn't install the service). IIRC, the default heap size for the 1.4.1 JVM on Windows is only 64 MB, and that's really not enough for any serious work. I suspect that you're spending much of your time in garbage collection. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tomcat CPU utilization pegged...total CPU only 50%
Hello, I am trying to performance test an application running Tomcat with Apache w/SSL (connected using mod_proxy). The OS is Windows Server 2003. The test I am running is simulating a user logging into the application (using JMeter for the testing framework). Increasing the number of users from 1, 2, 3, 4,5 the total CPU utilization jumps considerably. After 5 users the CPU utilization hits 50% for a second and then drops...When simulating 10 users, the CPU hits50% for a few seconds and drops back down, the more users, the longer the CPU is pegged at 50%. My question is why is tomcat only using 50% of the CPU? Seeing the CPU grow significantly with each user, and then peg out for longer periods of time with an increased user load indicates that the CPU is the choke point. Using performance monitor, the Tomcat % Processor Time pegs out at 100% for the duration that total CPU utilization is at 50%. Is there a configuration option that I am unaware of to allow tomcat to use more CPU? Thanks in advance! Kevin
RE: tomcat CPU utilization pegged...total CPU only 50%
Doug, Here you go: Tomcat Version: 4.1 JVM Version: 1.4.1_07 2 processors: P4 Xeon 3.06 Ghz Thanks, Kevin Williams -Original Message- From: Parsons Technical Services [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 8:38 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: tomcat CPU utilization pegged...total CPU only 50% [bcc][faked-from][bayes] Is this on a dual processor machine? What version of Tomcat and JVM? Doug - Original Message - From: Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 11:25 PM Subject: tomcat CPU utilization pegged...total CPU only 50% Hello, I am trying to performance test an application running Tomcat with Apache w/SSL (connected using mod_proxy). The OS is Windows Server 2003. The test I am running is simulating a user logging into the application (using JMeter for the testing framework). Increasing the number of users from 1, 2, 3, 4,5 the total CPU utilization jumps considerably. After 5 users the CPU utilization hits 50% for a second and then drops...When simulating 10 users, the CPU hits50% for a few seconds and drops back down, the more users, the longer the CPU is pegged at 50%. My question is why is tomcat only using 50% of the CPU? Seeing the CPU grow significantly with each user, and then peg out for longer periods of time with an increased user load indicates that the CPU is the choke point. Using performance monitor, the Tomcat % Processor Time pegs out at 100% for the duration that total CPU utilization is at 50%. Is there a configuration option that I am unaware of to allow tomcat to use more CPU? Thanks in advance! Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tomcat CPU utilization pegged...total CPU only 50%
Charles, Thanks for the help, here are your answers: I am using perfmon to monitor the % CPU Utilization (total and for the tomcat process). I added the tomcat process % CPU Utilization by doing the following: a. Within perfmon, Add an additional monitor. b. In the popup drop down list select process. c. Select % CPU Time d. Select the tomcat process. 1. Yes, tomcat is running as a service. 2. I am not aware of any CPU affinity settings. I tried to check these in Task Manager (never heard of them before you mentioned it--I'm new to this), but didn't have access. Looking into that, I found an article that stated you could only set this if the process is NOT running as a service. If this isn't the case, please let me know how to set/check it! 3. I'm not sure what options are set with the jvm (I didn't install the service). I can check with the individual who created the service tomorrow, and reset it to include the verbose:gc option though. Thanks! Kevin Williams -Original Message- From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 8:56 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: tomcat CPU utilization pegged...total CPU only 50% [bcc][faked-from][bayes] Importance: Low From: Kevin Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tomcat CPU utilization pegged...total CPU only 50% Using performance monitor, the Tomcat % Processor Time pegs out at 100% for the duration that total CPU utilization is at 50%. I'm confused. What tool or monitoring mechanism is telling you that total CPU utilization is 50% at the same time that PerfMon says it's 100%? Additional questions: 1) Are you running Tomcat as a service? 2) Are you using CPU affinity settings that would restrict Tomcat to one CPU? 3) Are you going into garbage collection frequently enough to prevent use of both CPUs? (Turn on -verbose:gc to check.) - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tomcat CPU utilization pegged...total CPU only 50%
Charles, My client has installed two instances of tomcat (each as a service). I'm not really sure how they did it (they have the standard C:/Program Files/Apache Group/Tomcat 4.1 folder, but the apps and conf files are in D:/instances/instance1/conf, D:/instances/instance1/app, D:/instances/instance1/work, D:/instances/instance1/log). I'll talk to the guy who configured this so I can emulate one of the instances in batch mode. I'll let you know how it goes after I make the changes! Kevin -Original Message- From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 10:00 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: tomcat CPU utilization pegged...total CPU only 50% [bcc][faked-from] Importance: Low From: Kevin Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: tomcat CPU utilization pegged...total CPU only 50% 1. Yes, tomcat is running as a service. You might want to shutdown that service and run it from a command-line window, at least for testing purposes. Easier to fiddle with heap size options and the like. 2. I am not aware of any CPU affinity settings. They won't show up in Task Manager. Not sure if the plain Windows Server supports affinity; my experience with that capability was on a 32-CPU Advanced (Enterprise?) Server system which I no longer have access to. There's an mmc plug in Admin Tools that lets you play with associating processes with CPUs, if it's available in your OS. 3. I'm not sure what options are set with the jvm (I didn't install the service). IIRC, the default heap size for the 1.4.1 JVM on Windows is only 64 MB, and that's really not enough for any serious work. I suspect that you're spending much of your time in garbage collection. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mod jk2 default app only set
Hi, I have Apache and Tomcat 4 (I can upgrade if necessary) running on a server where I want everything from 1 application going to tomcat. I configured the mod_jk2 so this can happen for an application in the following manner (workers2.properties file): [uri:/support/*] info=Map the support webapp worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 The problem I have is that I want my DEFAULT application to forward to tomcat and every other application to stay in Apache. So, when I type: www.mycompany.com it forwards to Tomcat, and when I type www.mycompany.com/upload it goes to the upload application in Apache. If I do my mapping in the workers2.properties file like above, I'd use uri: /* The problem is that this statement forwards everything including the upload application (which I don't want forwarded). Does anyone know of an aliasing trick, or something else that allows me to set an application as my default app, and have it ONLY forward to Tomcat? Thanks in advance, Kevin Williams - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: https -- http session problem
I read this post and have a question...and maybe I'm not understanding https correctly, but why is your login PAGE secure? I wouldn't care if someone sees an empty page with a prompt for the username and password. The post should be secure though... In other words... can't you have a page http://www.example.com/login.jsp post to something like https://www.example.com/login.do (this would be the url in the form tag) with the actual login action being secure? My understanding is that on the post, a secure session will be established and THEN the username and password will be posted. Then users would bookmark the log-in page as a non-secure page, and still be able to login without any funky work-around. If this understanding is correct, then if someone bookmars a secure page, they should get redirected to the login page anyway since they need to login first. Thanks, Kevin Williams On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 08:15, Andrew Mottaz wrote: On 11/17/2003 06:32 AM Andrew Mottaz wrote: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla. However, there aren't very many developers who like the idea of allowing you to hang yourself :). Thanks much for the tip -- I have to disagree about this not being a necessary change. There are plenty of apps where people browse without a secure connection, but have to log in to perform some functions. Users like to bookmark pages -- why should I force them to bookmark only non-secure pages? Giving a developer control over how session cookies function is better than forcing a hack where you have to always redirect to a non-secure page to establish the session. If you are writing an application where the session data is so sensitive that you have to protect against session hijacking, you should know about the difference between secure and non-secure cookies. I've got no problem if the default behavior uses secure cookies when ever possible, but change the Session uses cookie parameter to have a flag that allows session cookies to always be non-secure. Andrew, what reason is there for preventing users from bookmarking secure pages? I don't follow you there. Also, as far as I can see, the java community has decided that once you start a secure session, you should stay in a secure session, for various security reasons. Are you doing a secure login and then redirecting back to http afterwards? Adam Hi Adam, If a user bookmarks a secure page, and then tries to browse a non-secure page, the session is lost. The decision to keep a session secure iff the FIRST access is secure does not make sense to me. Imagine the following scenario -- A web site has different levels of user access. The difference between the users is what products they can see. The data is not terribly sensitive. However, the log-in should be secure for several reasons -- 1) For the users perception -- people do not like the This form is not secure message when logging in. 2) Capturing a user id and password is worse than hijacking one session. Now -- I have a web site with hundreds of pages of product data, and thousands of users. Many of these users bookmark the page https://www.example.com/jsp/login.jsp So -- if I want to allow users to bookmark this page, they will create a secure session. When they then browse the pages, I have two options: 1) Keep all of the links secure 2) Redirect them to a non-secure page (To establish a non-secure session), and then send them back to the secure log-in page. Option 1 is unacceptable -- the overhead of having all of these connections encrypted is not a viable option. Option 2 is a hacky workaround -- cookies have a Secure=yes flag so that it can be set and un-set as appropriate. Also -- this is the standard for Tomcat -- not Java --( it may be in the servlet/jsp spec -- but if so, it is a new addition). Other Java based app servers treat this differently. Finally -- I know that ASP used to have the OPPOSITE implementation -- session cookies were always non-secure. This is worse than Tomcat, but both are wrong. The developer needs to make the decision about what is appropriate. Again -- Just my 2 cents -- Is there a security issue I'm missing? If the argument is that you should NEVER go from secure to non-secure, the Tomcat solution does not assure that. It only means that you have to go non-secure, secure, and then non-secure. That seems quite arbitrary to me. Thanks, Andrew -- Andrew Mottaz Site 9 :: Internet Business Solutions 116 W. Illinois, Ste 6E Chicago, Illinois 60610 312.670.8469 www.site9.net - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Re: How to get mod_jk 2.0 for redhat
Michel, I strongly recommend building the connector from source. The reason for this is that the connector depends on the version of Apache you are using (at least that's my conclusion after many failed binary installs). I tried using binary versions, but wasn't able to. I finally did a source build on both Apache and and the mod connector and it worked great! Just my 2 cents... Kevin Williams On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 10:05, Michel Cote wrote: Hello, I'm looking for the BINARY distribution of the Tomcat web server connector (mod_jk 2.0) for Linux RedHat On the mirror sites i can connect on, i only find windows or solaris release. I tried to build from the source distribution but as i'm not a developper, i didn't manage... Thank in advance for any help. Michel COTE. PS : Sorry for my bad english. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how to make a scheduled event on tomcat
Or if you're on a linux environment, just use crontab by itself. I've heard there's something similar in the windows environment as well. On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 13:25, Shapira, Yoav wrote: Howdy, Like JCrontab? http://jcrontab.sourceforge.net/index.shtml ;) Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics -Original Message- From: Vladimer Shioshvili [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 4:15 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: how to make a scheduled event on tomcat i would like to have a method that would run every-so-often (let's say two weeks). i am guessing listener could be an option.. is there a better solution to achieve this? thanks Vlad Vladimer Shioshvili QRC Division of Macro International Inc. 7315 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 400W Bethesda, MD 20814 Phone: (301) 657 3077 ext. 155 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
null pointer exception when running mail example
Hi all, I am hoping someone can tell me why this happens! When I installed Tomcat, my mail example did not work. I got the following error: java.lang.NullPointerException at java.net.InetAddress.cacheAddress(InetAddress.java:648) at java.net.InetAddress.cacheAddress(InetAddress.java:633) at java.net.InetAddress.getAddressFromNameService(InetAddress.java:1016) at java.net.InetAddress.getLocalHost(InetAddress.java:1125) at javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress.getLocalAddress(InternetAddress.java:474) When I run the EXACT same code from my client IDE as a test it works fine! To make it work from the web though, I had to add 127.0.0.1 machineName to my hosts file. My question is, WHY? Why does it work different from within Tomcat than straight from my test app? IS it looking up via machine name instead of localhost? What exactly is happening here? I am running on Redhat 8.0 and using JSDK 1.4.1. Thanks for any help on this strange phenomenon! Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: null pointer exception when running mail example
How I'm invoking the mail example is by entering the following as the URL: http://localhost:8080/examples/jsp/mail/sendmail.jsp If this were kwilliamsLinux (my machine name) instead of localhost, I'd definitely see that as the potential source of the problem (although I didn't think of that until I read your email). I searched the internet, and they all said to ensure that 127.0.0.1 localdomain.localhost localhost was in my hosts file, which it was. What I had to add was the 127.0.0.1 kwilliamsLinux I can't figure out why tomcat is needing that when running from a command line (and removing tomcat from the equation) doesn't. I think this issue is specific for linux as well. Kevin My two cents follow. Make sure that your invoking your services consistently. Something like: localhost/MyWebApp/jsp_or_servlet or: 127.0.0.1/MyWebApp/jsp_or_servlet or: 128.43.10.19/MyWebApp/jsp_or_servlet Inconsistencies like these, can bring you headaches. since the default session management specs bind sessions to the url. If you change the url then you loose the session and hence you get errors like the ones you listed below. Best, -Francisco Bido On Friday, February 14, 2003, at 12:41 PM, Kevin Williams wrote: Hi all, I am hoping someone can tell me why this happens! When I installed Tomcat, my mail example did not work. I got the following error: java.lang.NullPointerException at java.net.InetAddress.cacheAddress(InetAddress.java:648) at java.net.InetAddress.cacheAddress(InetAddress.java:633) at java.net.InetAddress.getAddressFromNameService(InetAddress.java:1016) at java.net.InetAddress.getLocalHost(InetAddress.java:1125) at javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress.getLocalAddress(InternetAddress.jav a:474) When I run the EXACT same code from my client IDE as a test it works fine! To make it work from the web though, I had to add 127.0.0.1 machineName to my hosts file. My question is, WHY? Why does it work different from within Tomcat than straight from my test app? IS it looking up via machine name instead of localhost? What exactly is happening here? I am running on Redhat 8.0 and using JSDK 1.4.1. Thanks for any help on this strange phenomenon! Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mod_webapp on Linux - EAPI?
I downloaded the mod_webapp Linux binary for Tomcat 4.0.1 (I'm actually running 4.0.2 though, if that matters) and installed it. When Apache starts up, I get the warning about needing to re-compile mod_webapp with -DEAPI... Is there a mod_webapp binary available somewhere that has been compiled with the EAPI option? I've tried building it myself... (./support/buildconf.sh followed by ./configure) but when I run configure, I'm getting an error: cannot find or execute './configure' in 'webapp-module-1.0.1-tc401/apr'. Aparently, my Debian unstable system doesn't quite have everything that's needed for this build... So, if I could just download a prebuilt binary from somewhere, it would just be a lot easier. smile Thanks! -Zak -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
