Help: Context.xml Resource difference between 5.0.x and 5.5.x ?

2005-01-17 Thread TomK
I'm having trouble moving my webapp from Tomcat 5.0 to 5.5.  The dataSource in 
Context.xml seems to be the issue.
 
According to the 'JNDI how-to' documentation for 5.0 and 5.5, it looks like the 
'ResourceParams' tag has been removed from the Context.xml and instead you 
can now supply arbitrary attributes to the Resource tag itself.
 
In 5.0, my Context.xml looked like this and it worked fine:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
Context antiResourceLocking=true docBase=myapp path=/myapp
  Resource name=jdbc/db1 auth=Container 
  type=oracle.jdbc.pool.OracleDataSource /
  ResourceParams name=jdbc/db1
parameter
  namefactory/name
  valueoracle.jdbc.pool.OracleDataSourceFactory/value
/parameter
parameter
  namedriverClassName/name
  valueoracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver/value
/parameter
parameter
  nameurl/name
  valuejdbc:oracle:thin:@xx:xx:xx/value
/parameter
parameter
  nameuser/name
  valuexx/value
/parameter
parameter
  namepassword/name
  valuexx/value
/parameter
  /ResourceParams
/Context
 
...note that oracle's factory requires user, not username.

 
Moving to 5.5, I changed it to:
 
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
Context antiResourceLocking=true docBase=myapp path=/myapp
  Resource auth=Container 
  driverClassName=oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver 
  factory=oracle.jdbc.pool.OracleDataSourceFactory 
  name=jdbc/db1 
  password=xxx 
  type=oracle.jdbc.pool.OracleDataSource 
  url=jdbc:oracle:thin:@xx:xx:xx 
  user=xx/
/Context

...this new Context.xml doesn't work.  I get the following:
javax.naming.NamingException: Cannot create resource instance
 at 
org.apache.naming.factory.ResourceFactory.getObjectInstance(ResourceFactory.java:132)
 at javax.naming.spi.NamingManager.getObjectInstance(Unknown Source)
 at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:792)
 
any ideas?  Almost seems as if the factory attribute of Resource is not 
being used.
 
thanks
tk_


Solved: Context.xml Resource difference between 5.0.x and 5.5.x?

2005-01-17 Thread TomK
Solved.Crazy but true.
 
When using the Oracle factory:
In a Tomcat 5.0 context file, the url parameter (name, not the value) must be 
lower case.  In a Tomcat 5.5 context file, the url parameter must be UPPER 
CASE. 
 
Works now. Thanks for the help.  Sorry for so many mails...
tk


Parsons Technical Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The docs say that the factory parameter is only needed for entries that 
Tomcat is not aware of. Since you had a special factory(in your old 5.0 
context) and not the standard one used by Tomcat you will need to have the 
factory element in place.

See:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/globalresources.html

Under Resource Definitions it says:
You MUST also define any other needed parameters using attributes on the 
Resource element, to configure the object factory to be used (if not known 
to Tomcat already), and the properties used to configure that object 
factory.

And since Oracle does not use the standard factories that are built into 
Tomcat you will need the parameter for factory.

And I could be full of manure and sprouting daisies. But every now and then 
I get one right.


Doug



- Original Message - 
From: Sean M. Duncan 
To: 
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: Help: Context.xml Resource difference between 5.0.x and 5.5.x?


 On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 16:57 -0800, TomK wrote:
 I'm having trouble moving my webapp from Tomcat 5.0 to 5.5. The 
 dataSource in Context.xml seems to be the issue.

 According to the 'JNDI how-to' documentation for 5.0 and 5.5, it looks 
 like the '' tag has been removed from the Context.xml and 
 instead you can now supply arbitrary attributes to the tag 
 itself.

 In 5.0, my Context.xml looked like this and it worked fine:
 
 
  type=oracle.jdbc.pool.OracleDataSource /
 
 

 factory
 oracle.jdbc.pool.OracleDataSourceFactory
 

 

 driverClassName
 oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver
 

 

 url
 jdbc:oracle:thin:@xx:xx:xx
 

 

 user
 xx
 

 

 password
 xx
 

 
 

 ...note that oracle's factory requires user, not username.


 Moving to 5.5, I changed it to:

 
 
  driverClassName=oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver
 factory=oracle.jdbc.pool.OracleDataSourceFactory
 name=jdbc/db1
 password=xxx
 type=oracle.jdbc.pool.OracleDataSource
 url=jdbc:oracle:thin:@xx:xx:xx
 user=xx/
 

 ...this new Context.xml doesn't work. I get the following:
 javax.naming.NamingException: Cannot create resource instance
 at 
 org.apache.naming.factory.ResourceFactory.getObjectInstance(ResourceFactory.java:132)
 at javax.naming.spi.NamingManager.getObjectInstance(Unknown Source)
 at org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:792)

 any ideas? Almost seems as if the factory attribute of 
 is not being used.

 thanks
 tk_


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: JAR locking / Tomcat 5.5.4 / Windows

2005-01-13 Thread TomK
Thanks very much, I'll check the latest version out and post my results, in 
case anyone else has this issue.
 
-tk
 
didn't_get_my_coffee_this_morning_rant
That I find myself saying In case anyone else has this issue is somewhat 
amazing to me.  Either:  
1) Hardly anyone is using Windows as their deployment environment for Tomcat.   
(I probably wouldn't be either, if I had a choice.)
or
2) Those using Windows as the deploy environment aren't concerned about 
re-deploying applications, and are content to simply restart the server, so 
resource locking is not an issue.
or
3) Everyone can properly edit the context.xml file, except me and 5 other 
people on this list.
 
There have been quite a few posts to this list, as well as bugs opened in 
bugzilla reporting JAR locking (with versions 5.0.x, 5.5.x).   I'm a bit 
disheartened by the earlier replies.   Either the bug was closed as invalid, 
or the reply was Get yourself a better operating system, or You aren't doing 
it right. Given the unlikely nature of #3 above, it seems much more likely 
that this is indeed a bug.I hope it has been fixed.
/didn't_get_my_coffee_this_morning_rant
 

Dominik Drzewiecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Siarhei Dudzin wrote:
 Did you find a solution?

FYI it has been fixed on 17/12/2004 and the latest CVS version does not 
suffer from the nasty jar locking.
The root of the problem was the JasperLoader locking (using cached 
getResourceAsStream()) the jars containing jsp tag libraries.
It works for me. Please do give it a spin and test for yourselves. 
BTW, there seems to be 5.5.7 distro coming soon.

cheers,
/dd

 
 On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:27:56 -0800 (PST), TomK
 wrote:
 I've been following the recent threads regarding JAR locking with 
 Tomcat 5.x on Windows platforms. A few people mentioned they had been 
 able to get either the antiJARLocking or antiResourceLocking attributes 
 to work, so I've spent quite a bit of time trying out different 
 scenarios and configurations, under the impression that I must be 
 missing something simple.however, I've not yet found a situation 
 where either attribute has any effect on deploy/undeploy.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: JAR locking / Tomcat 5.5.4 / Windows

2005-01-13 Thread TomK
Success!  I was able to get the antiResourceLocking attribute to finally take 
effect with Tomcat 5.5.4.
 
The problem is the default Windows install does not set the Working Path 
(viewable on the Startup/Shutdown tabs of the service manager that sits in the 
SysTray).   Once I set the working path to the tomcat base directory, and 
restarted Tomcat, and deployed the WAR, the application files were copied to 
the temp directory and run from there, just as promised.  Undeploy works fine.  
   Interestingly, the directories created in the temp directory aren't deleted 
when Tomcat is shutdown, for the same reason: the jar's are locked.   
 
Dominik --  Regarding your statement that the latest CVS version does not 
suffer from the nasty jar locking.   I'll try it out later, but are you 
suggesting 5.5.7  will not have JAR locking issues at all, and thus the 
antiResourceLocking and antiJARLocking attributes will be unnecessary??
 
thanks
-tk

TomK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks very much, I'll check the latest version out and post my results, in 
case anyone else has this issue.

-tk

Dominik Drzewiecki wrote:
Siarhei Dudzin wrote:
 Did you find a solution?

FYI it has been fixed on 17/12/2004 and the latest CVS version does not 
suffer from the nasty jar locking.
The root of the problem was the JasperLoader locking (using cached 
getResourceAsStream()) the jars containing jsp tag libraries.
It works for me. Please do give it a spin and test for yourselves. 
BTW, there seems to be 5.5.7 distro coming soon.

cheers,
/dd

 
 On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:27:56 -0800 (PST), TomK
 wrote:
 I've been following the recent threads regarding JAR locking with 
 Tomcat 5.x on Windows platforms. A few people mentioned they had been 
 able to get either the antiJARLocking or antiResourceLocking attributes 
 to work, so I've spent quite a bit of time trying out different 
 scenarios and configurations, under the impression that I must be 
 missing something simple.however, I've not yet found a situation 
 where either attribute has any effect on deploy/undeploy.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



JAR locking / Tomcat 5.5.4 / Windows

2005-01-04 Thread TomK
I've been following the recent threads regarding JAR locking with Tomcat 5.x on 
Windows platforms.   A few people mentioned they had been able to get either 
the antiJARLocking or antiResourceLocking attributes to work, so I've spent 
quite a bit of time trying out different scenarios and configurations, under 
the impression that I must be missing something simple.however, I've not 
yet found a situation where either attribute has any effect on deploy/undeploy. 
  
 
I've put together a simple app that illustrates the issue.Here's how to 
replicate:
(I've actually started with a fresh, clean copy of Windows XP SP2)
1. Install JRE 5.0 (Update 1)
2. Install Tomcat 5.5.4, using windows installer.
3. Start Tomcat.  
4. Using the manager webApp, deploy this WAR.
5. Point your browser to the webApp (named 'sample'), follow the link, enter 
data in sample form, click OK.
6. note the [TomcatHome]/'temp' directory is empty.
7. Using the manager webApp, undeploy the sample app.
 
at this point, on my machine, struts.jar is left in the WEB-INF/lib directory.  
 Note that at step 5, the application should be running from the 'temp' 
directory, which it is not.The context.xml for this webApp has the 
antiResourceLocking=true value set.   Setting this attribute in the global 
context.xml also has no effect.
 
Any ideas are appreciated.
thanks
tk



Re: JAR locking / Tomcat 5.5.4 / Windows

2005-01-04 Thread TomK
Re: the WAR link was stripped out in that last message.  It is located here:  
http://www.tomk.nu/tc00/sample.war