Re: [WORKAROUND] Re: VERY weird problem with commons-logging and Tomcat5

2003-12-12 Thread Remy Maucherat
Philipp Taprogge wrote:
Hi!

I still do not know what is causing this behavior, but I found a 
workaround in case anyone else stumbles upon this problem:

In my log4j.properties I left the log4j.rootCategory property alone and 
only set log4j.category.package.name.of.my.classes properties for each 
package in my webapp to DEBUG.
This way I only get the DEBUG output of my own classes and not ALL debug 
messages generated by the container.
I still wonder why my log4j.properties in /WEB-INF/classes should 
reconfigure the container's whole logging mechanism. Either this is a 
major bug or tomcat4's doing it right was one.
I will look into the issue. However, if it's a bug, then not much may be 
done about it, and likely the fix will need to be in c-l (Tomcat 4 
integration of c-l is unreliable).

As Jacob mentioned, you will need both c-l and log4j in /WEB-INF/lib 
(both the logger and the c-l logger wrapper should reside in the 
classloader where they are used). Note that this caused big problems in 
TC 4.1.x, so maybe you didn't do that.

--
x
Rémy Maucherat
Senior Developer  Consultant
JBoss Group (Europe) SàRL
x
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [WORKAROUND] Re: VERY weird problem with commons-logging and Tomcat5

2003-12-12 Thread Remy Maucherat
Remy Maucherat wrote:

Philipp Taprogge wrote:

Hi!

I still do not know what is causing this behavior, but I found a 
workaround in case anyone else stumbles upon this problem:

In my log4j.properties I left the log4j.rootCategory property alone 
and only set log4j.category.package.name.of.my.classes properties for 
each package in my webapp to DEBUG.
This way I only get the DEBUG output of my own classes and not ALL 
debug messages generated by the container.
I still wonder why my log4j.properties in /WEB-INF/classes should 
reconfigure the container's whole logging mechanism. Either this is a 
major bug or tomcat4's doing it right was one.


I will look into the issue. However, if it's a bug, then not much may be 
done about it, and likely the fix will need to be in c-l (Tomcat 4 
integration of c-l is unreliable).

As Jacob mentioned, you will need both c-l and log4j in /WEB-INF/lib 
(both the logger and the c-l logger wrapper should reside in the 
classloader where they are used). Note that this caused big problems in 
TC 4.1.x, so maybe you didn't do that.
I did review it, and test it with the admin webapp (so Struts based). 
log4j will be used for all DEBUG or higher logs which are sent through 
commons-logging for this context while the context classloader of the 
deployment thread is set to your webapp classloader.
However, this means *a lot*, and includes all the digester events from 
parsing the web.xml. I think digester should use TRACE for all that 
stuff. This also includes Struts digester events, etc.

It is possible this wasn't the same in 4.1.x (but it was broken).

Logging from other contexts will go in their defined loggers or 
common-logging configured loggers.

--
x
Rémy Maucherat
Senior Developer  Consultant
JBoss Group (Europe) SàRL
x
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [WORKAROUND] Re: VERY weird problem with commons-logging and Tomcat5

2003-12-12 Thread Philipp Taprogge
Hi!

Jacob Kjome wrote:
You can also use a repository selector.  BTW, do you have log4j.jar 
*and* commons-logging.jar (not commons-logging-api.jar) in WEB-INF/lib?
Yes, I do, but I have tried several scenarios with and without either of 
them in my WEB-INF/lib.
Also I tried putting/removing them in common/lib and server/lib.
The result was always negative.

Hmm... repository selector... never heared of that. Could you kindly 
point me to some resource about this? Sounds exactly like what I am 
looking for.

Thanks in advance

	Phil

--
And on the seventh day, He exited from append mode.
(Book of create(2), line 255)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [WORKAROUND] Re: VERY weird problem with commons-logging and Tomcat5

2003-12-12 Thread Jacob Kjome
At 02:22 PM 12/12/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Hi!

Jacob Kjome wrote:
You can also use a repository selector.  BTW, do you have log4j.jar *and* 
commons-logging.jar (not commons-logging-api.jar) in WEB-INF/lib?
Yes, I do, but I have tried several scenarios with and without either of 
them in my WEB-INF/lib.
Also I tried putting/removing them in common/lib and server/lib.
The result was always negative.

Hmm... repository selector... never heared of that. Could you kindly point 
me to some resource about this? Sounds exactly like what I am looking for.
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Log4JProjectPages/AppContainerLogging

But I have no idea how this will integrate with commons-logging, so unless 
you are using Log4j exclusively, I cannot guarantee this will work.  BTW, 
ContextJNDISelector has been moved to log4j proper (out of the sandbox) and 
will be in Log4j-1.3 when it comes out.  Get it from CVS if you want to use it.

Jake


Thanks in advance

Phil

--
And on the seventh day, He exited from append mode.
(Book of create(2), line 255)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[WORKAROUND] Re: VERY weird problem with commons-logging and Tomcat5

2003-12-11 Thread Philipp Taprogge
Hi!

I still do not know what is causing this behavior, but I found a 
workaround in case anyone else stumbles upon this problem:

In my log4j.properties I left the log4j.rootCategory property alone 
and only set log4j.category.package.name.of.my.classes properties for 
each package in my webapp to DEBUG.
This way I only get the DEBUG output of my own classes and not ALL 
debug messages generated by the container.
I still wonder why my log4j.properties in /WEB-INF/classes should 
reconfigure the container's whole logging mechanism. Either this is a 
major bug or tomcat4's doing it right was one.

'Till later

	Phil

Philipp Taprogge wrote:

Hi!

I have a very disgusting problem here... I am developing a webapp which 
uses commons-logging and log4j.
All I do is use the commons' Log and LogFactory in my application and 
place a log4j.properties file in my WEB-INF/classes.
This property file looks like this (w/out the CR in the middle line of 
course):

log4j.rootCategory=DEBUG, warthoglog
log4j.appender.warthoglog=org.apache.log4j.RollingFileAppender
log4j.appender.warthoglog.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
log4j.appender.warthoglog.layout.ConversionPattern=%d{ISO8601}
[%-15C{1}] %-5p - %m%n
log4j.appender.warthoglog.File=${catalina.home}/logs/warthog.log
log4j.appender.warthoglog.MaxFileSize=2048KB
log4j.appender.warthoglog.MaxBackupIndex=20
log4j.appender.warthoglog.Append=true
This works fine, except that I get not only my application's log 
messages but _ALL_ tomcat debug logging in this file, which firstly 
slows down my machine (no wonder) and secondly grows the logfile to a 
few MBs just from startup.
What the heck am I doing wrong here? This setup worked perfectly in the 
last tomcat4.

Can anyone advice?

Philipp Taprogge



--
I love deadlines, I love the whooshing noise they make as they go by
- Douglas Adams
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [WORKAROUND] Re: VERY weird problem with commons-logging and Tomcat5

2003-12-11 Thread Jacob Kjome
You can also use a repository selector.  BTW, do you have log4j.jar *and* 
commons-logging.jar (not commons-logging-api.jar) in WEB-INF/lib?  If not, 
put them there and try this scenario again.  A repository selector should 
not be necessary in this situation.  However, I always use one as it 
guarantees separate logger repositories for each application (based on JNDI 
namespace) with no chance of stepping on each other whether or not I have 
log4j.jar in WEB-INF/lib or a parent classloader.

Jake

At 12:40 AM 12/12/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Hi!

I still do not know what is causing this behavior, but I found a 
workaround in case anyone else stumbles upon this problem:

In my log4j.properties I left the log4j.rootCategory property alone and 
only set log4j.category.package.name.of.my.classes properties for each 
package in my webapp to DEBUG.
This way I only get the DEBUG output of my own classes and not ALL debug 
messages generated by the container.
I still wonder why my log4j.properties in /WEB-INF/classes should 
reconfigure the container's whole logging mechanism. Either this is a 
major bug or tomcat4's doing it right was one.

'Till later

Phil

Philipp Taprogge wrote:

Hi!
I have a very disgusting problem here... I am developing a webapp which 
uses commons-logging and log4j.
All I do is use the commons' Log and LogFactory in my application and 
place a log4j.properties file in my WEB-INF/classes.
This property file looks like this (w/out the CR in the middle line of 
course):
log4j.rootCategory=DEBUG, warthoglog
log4j.appender.warthoglog=org.apache.log4j.RollingFileAppender
log4j.appender.warthoglog.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
log4j.appender.warthoglog.layout.ConversionPattern=%d{ISO8601}
[%-15C{1}] %-5p - %m%n
log4j.appender.warthoglog.File=${catalina.home}/logs/warthog.log
log4j.appender.warthoglog.MaxFileSize=2048KB
log4j.appender.warthoglog.MaxBackupIndex=20
log4j.appender.warthoglog.Append=true
This works fine, except that I get not only my application's log messages 
but _ALL_ tomcat debug logging in this file, which firstly slows down my 
machine (no wonder) and secondly grows the logfile to a few MBs just from 
startup.
What the heck am I doing wrong here? This setup worked perfectly in the 
last tomcat4.
Can anyone advice?
Philipp Taprogge


--
I love deadlines, I love the whooshing noise they make as they go by
- Douglas Adams
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]