Hyperthreading and Java (was RE: Tale of two servers)

2005-02-25 Thread Peter Crowther
 From: Graham Reeds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Also disable HyperThreading in the BIOS on the new Dell.  HT 
 and Java is not a happy combination.

Interesting... do you have any recommended reading on that, Graham?

- Peter

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Hyperthreading and Java (was RE: Tale of two servers)

2005-02-25 Thread Shankar Unni
Peter Crowther wrote:
From: Graham Reeds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also disable HyperThreading in the BIOS on the new Dell.  HT
and Java is not a happy combination.
Interesting... do you have any recommended reading on that, Graham?
Love these urban-legend types of warnings (don't flash your 
headlights...).

I think Graham is referring to a bug in the 1.4.2 line of JVMs where 
under certain circumstances, the HotSpot compiler trips over the garbage 
collector, and causes mysterious VM aborts.  I believe there have been 
fixes in 1.4.2_06 and 1.4.2_07, and also in 1.5.0_01.

It's triggered more easily in an HT or MP machine, but the important 
thing is that it can also be tripped on non-HT, single-processor 
machines (though much more rarely).

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Tale of two servers

2005-02-24 Thread Graham Reeds
The offender is a super duper new dell desktop with
4gb of ram, etc. It's running java 1.5 and is
committed to nothing by tomcat.
Also disable HyperThreading in the BIOS on the new Dell.  HT and Java is 
not a happy combination.

G.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Tale of two servers

2005-02-14 Thread Dola Woolfe
Thanks for all responses. I have some new info.

1. Reverse lookup is disabled on both machines. That
probably rules out DNS resolution.
2. The better-but-slower machine is running java 1.5.
The worse-but-faster machine is running 1.4.2 with the
compatibility package.
3. Finally, and the most hopeful point, the
better-but-slower server is running Norton virus
services. Restarting the machine in safe mode (w/
networkin) solved the problem. Does this settle it? If
so, what particular setting in Norton is responsible
for this?

Many thanks in advance,

Dola 
--- George Sexton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The most common thing for this kind of issue is DNS
 resolution.
 
 George Sexton
 MH Software, Inc.
 http://www.mhsoftware.com/
 Voice: 303 438 9585
   
 
  
  On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 01:19:10 -0800 (PST), Dola
 Woolfe
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   The offender is a super duper new dell desktop
 with
   4gb of ram, etc. It's running java 1.5 and is
   committed to nothing by tomcat.
   
   The winner is a rinky-dink 2 year old laptop
 with
   little ram, and lots of spyware sucking out cpu.
 
 

-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Tale of two servers

2005-02-14 Thread Peter Crowther
 From: Dola Woolfe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 3. Finally, and the most hopeful point, the
 better-but-slower server is running Norton virus
 services. Restarting the machine in safe mode (w/
 networkin) solved the problem. Does this settle it? If
 so, what particular setting in Norton is responsible
 for this?

Real-time scanning.  Turn it off completely if you can; turn it off on
your webapp and any application directory, plus your database files, if
you can't.  If your IT team insist that you run real-time scanning,
insist that they buy you a big enough server to cope with their paranoia
;-).

- Peter

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Tale of two servers

2005-02-14 Thread Dola Woolfe
Sorry for being dumb, but where is that option? Can't
seem to find it. The Option categories I have are

Auto-Protect
Script Blocing
Manual Scan

Email
Instant Messenger
LiveUpdate

Threat Categories
Mescellaneous

Thanks

--- Peter Crowther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

  From: Dola Woolfe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  3. Finally, and the most hopeful point, the
  better-but-slower server is running Norton virus
  services. Restarting the machine in safe mode (w/
  networkin) solved the problem. Does this settle
 it? If
  so, what particular setting in Norton is
 responsible
  for this?
 
 Real-time scanning.  Turn it off completely if you
 can; turn it off on
 your webapp and any application directory, plus your
 database files, if
 you can't.  If your IT team insist that you run
 real-time scanning,
 insist that they buy you a big enough server to cope
 with their paranoia
 ;-).
 
   - Peter
 

-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 




__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Tale of two servers

2005-02-14 Thread Peter Crowther
 From: Dola Woolfe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sorry for being dumb, but where is that option? Can't
 seem to find it. The Option categories I have are
 
 Auto-Protect

Sorry, Dola, I meant auto-protect - different AVs have different names
for it.  You may wish to turn it off temporarily by right-clicking the
Norton icon in the system tray and disabling it, to see what effect it
has.

- Peter

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Tale of two servers

2005-02-14 Thread Parsons Technical Services
Not sure if this will work but I think the option referred to is not 
available on the newer versions. Try to add the Tomcat folder to the list of 
exclusions under the Auto-Protect menu.

Doug
- Original Message - 
From: Dola Woolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 12:21 PM
Subject: RE: Tale of two servers


Sorry for being dumb, but where is that option? Can't
seem to find it. The Option categories I have are
Auto-Protect
Script Blocing
Manual Scan
Email
Instant Messenger
LiveUpdate
Threat Categories
Mescellaneous
Thanks
--- Peter Crowther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 From: Dola Woolfe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 3. Finally, and the most hopeful point, the
 better-but-slower server is running Norton virus
 services. Restarting the machine in safe mode (w/
 networkin) solved the problem. Does this settle
it? If
 so, what particular setting in Norton is
responsible
 for this?
Real-time scanning.  Turn it off completely if you
can; turn it off on
your webapp and any application directory, plus your
database files, if
you can't.  If your IT team insist that you run
real-time scanning,
insist that they buy you a big enough server to cope
with their paranoia
;-).
- Peter

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Tale of two servers

2005-02-14 Thread Mladen Turk
Dola Woolfe wrote:
Thanks for all responses. I have some new info.

3. Finally, and the most hopeful point, the
better-but-slower server is running Norton virus
services. Restarting the machine in safe mode (w/
networkin) solved the problem. Does this settle it? If
so, what particular setting in Norton is responsible
for this?
Antivirus software on a production system?
You must be joking ;)!
Are you reading emails on that box or what?
You should consider restricting access to the box
only to the authorized people, and have some
sort of policy what sortware and for what pupose
can be installed on that box.
This will be the ultimate antivirus software thought.
Regards,
Mladen.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Tale of two servers

2005-02-14 Thread Peter Crowther
 From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Antivirus software on a production system?
 You must be joking ;)!

rant
Unfortunately not.  All too often, corporate policy says that *all*
boxes must have AV installed on them, and it is increasingly a sacking
offence to disable it.  The larger the corporation, it seems, the more
likely that this is the policy.  Yes, this is a knee-jerk reaction.  No,
I wouldn't expect it to change - in fact, I'd expect it to get worse as
more middle managers play things 'safe'.  So we'll get poorly-performing
systems at best, and subtle errors that cost organisations millions of
pounds at worst, as perfectly innocent filesystem accesses time out due
to poor AV configuration.  But, never mind, some manager has covered
his/her ass, so everything's fine.
/rant

- Peter

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Tale of two servers

2005-02-14 Thread Dola Woolfe
Hi,

Proud to say I'm not going to cover my ass (if I don't
have to :). But I remember there were some worms that
hit your computer even if you didn't do anything on
it. One day my non-av'ed computer just went down with
SoBig, I think, while Norton caught it on all other
computers. So perhaps it is a good idea even on
servers with restricted access.

Dola

--- Peter Crowther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

  From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Antivirus software on a production system?
  You must be joking ;)!
 
 rant
 Unfortunately not.  All too often, corporate policy
 says that *all*
 boxes must have AV installed on them, and it is
 increasingly a sacking
 offence to disable it.  The larger the corporation,
 it seems, the more
 likely that this is the policy.  Yes, this is a
 knee-jerk reaction.  No,
 I wouldn't expect it to change - in fact, I'd expect
 it to get worse as
 more middle managers play things 'safe'.  So we'll
 get poorly-performing
 systems at best, and subtle errors that cost
 organisations millions of
 pounds at worst, as perfectly innocent filesystem
 accesses time out due
 to poor AV configuration.  But, never mind, some
 manager has covered
 his/her ass, so everything's fine.
 /rant
 
   - Peter
 

-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 




__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Tale of two servers

2005-02-14 Thread Jason Bainbridge
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:41:22 -0800 (PST), Dola Woolfe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Proud to say I'm not going to cover my ass (if I don't
 have to :). But I remember there were some worms that
 hit your computer even if you didn't do anything on
 it. One day my non-av'ed computer just went down with
 SoBig, I think, while Norton caught it on all other
 computers. So perhaps it is a good idea even on
 servers with restricted access.

This is where you need to block ports and disable services on the
servers that shouldn't be there plus if SoBig or another variety of
virus/worm is getting on your network then the hole is elsewhere not
on your server.

Alternatively it makes a damn good business case to move your Tomcat
over to Linux or a flavour of Unix. :)

Regards,
-- 
Jason Bainbridge
KDE - Conquer Your Desktop - http://kde.org
KDE Web Team - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Tale of two servers

2005-02-14 Thread Joel
 Proud to say I'm not going to cover my ass (if I don't
 have to :).

Covering your backside is fine, just make sure you cover it with
something appropriate and effective.

 But I remember there were some worms that
 hit your computer even if you didn't do anything on
 it. One day my non-av'ed computer just went down with
 SoBig, I think, while Norton caught it on all other
 computers.

That's kind of like saying it's good to make everyone wear those 80+
pound suits of armor so you can leave the fort gate open.

 So perhaps it is a good idea even on
 servers with restricted access.

Armor rusts, too: 

http://securityresponse.symantec.com

and check the updates for Symantec. I understand anyone using Symantec
products is being encouraged to be sure those updates are in place ASAP.

Whether management wants to bog servers down with anti-v or not is their
decision, but if they want to be good neighbors and good citizens, they
need to hire or train someone who can set up correct firewalls and
demilitarized zones, etc.

--
Joel Rees   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
digitcom, inc.   株式会社デジコム
Kobe, Japan   +81-78-672-8800
** http://www.ddcom.co.jp **


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Tale of two servers

2005-02-11 Thread George Sexton
The most common thing for this kind of issue is DNS resolution.

George Sexton
MH Software, Inc.
http://www.mhsoftware.com/
Voice: 303 438 9585
  

 
 On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 01:19:10 -0800 (PST), Dola Woolfe
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The offender is a super duper new dell desktop with
  4gb of ram, etc. It's running java 1.5 and is
  committed to nothing by tomcat.
  
  The winner is a rinky-dink 2 year old laptop with
  little ram, and lots of spyware sucking out cpu.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Tale of two servers

2005-02-10 Thread Vinny
More details please. Are both machine running the same version of Java.
Are they both connecting to an external database? Exact same versions 
of Tomcat 5.5.x ?


On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 01:19:10 -0800 (PST), Dola Woolfe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm running TC5.5 on two different servers in the same
 office. Both run XP Pro SP2. Both servers are
 programmatically queried by users and are bombarded
 with thousands of requests.
 
 One of the servers responds much more quickly than the
 other. In fact, one of them causes timeouts.
 
 The offender is a super duper new dell desktop with
 4gb of ram, etc. It's running java 1.5 and is
 committed to nothing by tomcat.
 
 The winner is a rinky-dink 2 year old laptop with
 little ram, and lots of spyware sucking out cpu.
 
 So this is obviously counterintuitive and I'm
 wondering if anyone could suggest where to begin
 looking for problems!
 
 Many thank in advance,
 
 Dola
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 All your favorites on one personal page  Try My Yahoo!
 http://my.yahoo.com
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Tale of two servers

2005-02-10 Thread Mike Curwen

does the fast one run any anti-virus software?  That's been known to kill
performance.


Mike Curwen


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]