RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache

2003-01-20 Thread neal 
See, I knew there was something I didn't understand.  Thanks.  I'll take a
look.  :)

Neal

-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 12:42 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache



I gave you this link:

ftp://ftp.cise.ufl.edu/pub/mirrors/redhat-contrib/libc6/i386/httpd-2.0.43-1.
i386.rpm

Which is the link to a Red Hat mirror that has the Apache 2.0.43 binary RPM.
Any other contrib mirror will have it as well, if there is one closer to
you.  Installing that would upgrade your Apache to 2.0.43.

There are indeed binaries (not in RPM format) for Linux on the Apache site:

1) go here: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi

2) choose a mirror site

3) on that mirror site, go to http://some.mirror.site/httpd/binaries/linux/

This is all sys-admin stuff, not really related to Tomcat at all.  If you
need help with RPM, I would ask on a Red Hat list or check the man pages
(man rpm)...I don't use them so I can't tell you the exact command that will
install it and upgrade the existing 2.0.40 at the same time.

John

> -Original Message-
> From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 3:32 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
>
>
> Yeah ... I saw that you sent me the link for mod_jk
> compatible with Apache
> 2.0.43.  But, I already have that.  I need binaries for
> either (a) Apache
> 2.0.43 or (b) Mod_jk 2.0.40.  In this link that you provided
> there is only a
> binary for Mod_jk-2.0.43.  If I go to the Apache site to download
> Apache-2.0.43 there are only links to (a) the source or (b)
> binaries for
> *Windows*!.
>
> I am sure I am probably missing somethinng ... please tell me
> what it is?!?!
>
> Thanks.
> Neal
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:57 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
>
>
>
> There are binaries for Apache 2.0.43, all over the place.
>
> http://httpd.apache.org
>
> I gave you a link to the binary Red Hat-compatible RPM for
> 2.0.43 so that
> you could upgrade your RH 2.0.40 installation.
>
> I gave you a link to the binary for mod_jk that is compatible
> with 2.0.43.
>
> Sorry, but I just don't see what else you need.
>
> John
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:54 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> >
> >
> > Actually, I was just trying to find binaries for compatible
> > versions of
> > either Apache or mod_jk.  So, I wanted to find either (a)
> > Apache 2.0.43 or
> > (b) Mod_jk 2.0.40.
> >
> > Perhaps its me and my phobias of doing a src build on Linux
> > (which I barely
> > know) but I am just not comfortable doing a src build. I
> > presume I'd need to
> > download and learn some C compiler to do the task ... and
> > that's on top of
> > barely knowing the OS!
> >
> > Regarding the pedantics, *IF* the current supported version
> > of Apache is
> > 2.0.43 ... shouldn't there be binaries for it?  And even if
> > not, should
> > there be binaries of mod_jk for 2.0.40?   It seems like an
> out-of-sync
> > doulbe whammy!
> >
> > :(
> >
> > Neal
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:40 AM
> > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> >
> >
> >
> > Sorry, you lost me.  You asked for a link to mod_jk for
> Apache 2.0.43,
> > that's what I gave you.
> >
> > .43 is the supported Apache version.  I don't use RPMs, but
> > it should be
> > fairly trivial to upgrade a RH installation with Apache
> 2.0.40 to .43.
> >
> > Not to be pedantic, but the current "official" Apache HTTP
> > release is .43,
> > regardless of whether Red Hat is current or not...it seems
> > reasonable to me
> > that another Jakarta project would support that version and
> > not earlier
> > versions.
> >
> > For example:
> > ftp://ftp.cise.ufl.edu/pub/mirrors/redhat-contrib/libc6/i386/h
> > ttpd-2.0.43-1.
> > i386.rpm
> >
> > Most RH mirrors will have it.
> >
> > John
> >
> > > -Original Message-

RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache

2003-01-20 Thread Turner, John 

I gave you this link:

ftp://ftp.cise.ufl.edu/pub/mirrors/redhat-contrib/libc6/i386/httpd-2.0.43-1.
i386.rpm

Which is the link to a Red Hat mirror that has the Apache 2.0.43 binary RPM.
Any other contrib mirror will have it as well, if there is one closer to
you.  Installing that would upgrade your Apache to 2.0.43.

There are indeed binaries (not in RPM format) for Linux on the Apache site:

1) go here: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi

2) choose a mirror site

3) on that mirror site, go to http://some.mirror.site/httpd/binaries/linux/

This is all sys-admin stuff, not really related to Tomcat at all.  If you
need help with RPM, I would ask on a Red Hat list or check the man pages
(man rpm)...I don't use them so I can't tell you the exact command that will
install it and upgrade the existing 2.0.40 at the same time.

John

> -Original Message-
> From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 3:32 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> 
> 
> Yeah ... I saw that you sent me the link for mod_jk 
> compatible with Apache
> 2.0.43.  But, I already have that.  I need binaries for 
> either (a) Apache
> 2.0.43 or (b) Mod_jk 2.0.40.  In this link that you provided 
> there is only a
> binary for Mod_jk-2.0.43.  If I go to the Apache site to download
> Apache-2.0.43 there are only links to (a) the source or (b) 
> binaries for
> *Windows*!.
> 
> I am sure I am probably missing somethinng ... please tell me 
> what it is?!?!
> 
> Thanks.
> Neal
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:57 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> 
> 
> 
> There are binaries for Apache 2.0.43, all over the place.
> 
> http://httpd.apache.org
> 
> I gave you a link to the binary Red Hat-compatible RPM for 
> 2.0.43 so that
> you could upgrade your RH 2.0.40 installation.
> 
> I gave you a link to the binary for mod_jk that is compatible 
> with 2.0.43.
> 
> Sorry, but I just don't see what else you need.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:54 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> >
> >
> > Actually, I was just trying to find binaries for compatible
> > versions of
> > either Apache or mod_jk.  So, I wanted to find either (a)
> > Apache 2.0.43 or
> > (b) Mod_jk 2.0.40.
> >
> > Perhaps its me and my phobias of doing a src build on Linux
> > (which I barely
> > know) but I am just not comfortable doing a src build. I
> > presume I'd need to
> > download and learn some C compiler to do the task ... and
> > that's on top of
> > barely knowing the OS!
> >
> > Regarding the pedantics, *IF* the current supported version
> > of Apache is
> > 2.0.43 ... shouldn't there be binaries for it?  And even if
> > not, should
> > there be binaries of mod_jk for 2.0.40?   It seems like an 
> out-of-sync
> > doulbe whammy!
> >
> > :(
> >
> > Neal
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:40 AM
> > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> >
> >
> >
> > Sorry, you lost me.  You asked for a link to mod_jk for 
> Apache 2.0.43,
> > that's what I gave you.
> >
> > .43 is the supported Apache version.  I don't use RPMs, but
> > it should be
> > fairly trivial to upgrade a RH installation with Apache 
> 2.0.40 to .43.
> >
> > Not to be pedantic, but the current "official" Apache HTTP
> > release is .43,
> > regardless of whether Red Hat is current or not...it seems
> > reasonable to me
> > that another Jakarta project would support that version and
> > not earlier
> > versions.
> >
> > For example:
> > ftp://ftp.cise.ufl.edu/pub/mirrors/redhat-contrib/libc6/i386/h
> > ttpd-2.0.43-1.
> > i386.rpm
> >
> > Most RH mirrors will have it.
> >
> > John
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:20 PM
> > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes, but when I go to

RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache

2003-01-20 Thread neal 
Yeah ... I saw that you sent me the link for mod_jk compatible with Apache
2.0.43.  But, I already have that.  I need binaries for either (a) Apache
2.0.43 or (b) Mod_jk 2.0.40.  In this link that you provided there is only a
binary for Mod_jk-2.0.43.  If I go to the Apache site to download
Apache-2.0.43 there are only links to (a) the source or (b) binaries for
*Windows*!.

I am sure I am probably missing somethinng ... please tell me what it is?!?!

Thanks.
Neal

-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:57 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache



There are binaries for Apache 2.0.43, all over the place.

http://httpd.apache.org

I gave you a link to the binary Red Hat-compatible RPM for 2.0.43 so that
you could upgrade your RH 2.0.40 installation.

I gave you a link to the binary for mod_jk that is compatible with 2.0.43.

Sorry, but I just don't see what else you need.

John


> -Original Message-
> From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:54 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
>
>
> Actually, I was just trying to find binaries for compatible
> versions of
> either Apache or mod_jk.  So, I wanted to find either (a)
> Apache 2.0.43 or
> (b) Mod_jk 2.0.40.
>
> Perhaps its me and my phobias of doing a src build on Linux
> (which I barely
> know) but I am just not comfortable doing a src build. I
> presume I'd need to
> download and learn some C compiler to do the task ... and
> that's on top of
> barely knowing the OS!
>
> Regarding the pedantics, *IF* the current supported version
> of Apache is
> 2.0.43 ... shouldn't there be binaries for it?  And even if
> not, should
> there be binaries of mod_jk for 2.0.40?   It seems like an out-of-sync
> doulbe whammy!
>
> :(
>
> Neal
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:40 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
>
>
>
> Sorry, you lost me.  You asked for a link to mod_jk for Apache 2.0.43,
> that's what I gave you.
>
> .43 is the supported Apache version.  I don't use RPMs, but
> it should be
> fairly trivial to upgrade a RH installation with Apache 2.0.40 to .43.
>
> Not to be pedantic, but the current "official" Apache HTTP
> release is .43,
> regardless of whether Red Hat is current or not...it seems
> reasonable to me
> that another Jakarta project would support that version and
> not earlier
> versions.
>
> For example:
> ftp://ftp.cise.ufl.edu/pub/mirrors/redhat-contrib/libc6/i386/h
> ttpd-2.0.43-1.
> i386.rpm
>
> Most RH mirrors will have it.
>
> John
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:20 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> >
> >
> > Yes, but when I go to the Linux dir it says
> >
> > "mod_jk-2.0.43.so is for Apache 2.0.42 (and 2.0.43) "
> >
> > It does not appear that a binary version is available that is
> > compatible
> > with Apache 2.0.40 (the version shipping with RedHat Linux 8
> > by the way).
> >
> > I am suprised this particular build is not available.  Is
> > there something I
> > am missing?  :(
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Neal
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 4:44 AM
> > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> >
> >
> >
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/
> > release/v1.2.2
> > /bin/linux/i386/
> >
> > Browse around in that tree to find others if needed.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 8:57 PM
> > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks.  I've never had to compile anything like this on
> > > Linux and am a
> > > little hesitant to do so (more of a windows guy to be
> > > honost).  Do you know
> > > of any place that I could locate pre-compiled *compatible*
> > > binaries for
> > > either apache 2.0.43 o

RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache

2003-01-20 Thread Turner, John 

There are binaries for Apache 2.0.43, all over the place.  

http://httpd.apache.org

I gave you a link to the binary Red Hat-compatible RPM for 2.0.43 so that
you could upgrade your RH 2.0.40 installation.

I gave you a link to the binary for mod_jk that is compatible with 2.0.43.

Sorry, but I just don't see what else you need.

John


> -Original Message-
> From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:54 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> 
> 
> Actually, I was just trying to find binaries for compatible 
> versions of
> either Apache or mod_jk.  So, I wanted to find either (a) 
> Apache 2.0.43 or
> (b) Mod_jk 2.0.40.
> 
> Perhaps its me and my phobias of doing a src build on Linux 
> (which I barely
> know) but I am just not comfortable doing a src build. I 
> presume I'd need to
> download and learn some C compiler to do the task ... and 
> that's on top of
> barely knowing the OS!
> 
> Regarding the pedantics, *IF* the current supported version 
> of Apache is
> 2.0.43 ... shouldn't there be binaries for it?  And even if 
> not, should
> there be binaries of mod_jk for 2.0.40?   It seems like an out-of-sync
> doulbe whammy!
> 
> :(
> 
> Neal
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:40 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> 
> 
> 
> Sorry, you lost me.  You asked for a link to mod_jk for Apache 2.0.43,
> that's what I gave you.
> 
> .43 is the supported Apache version.  I don't use RPMs, but 
> it should be
> fairly trivial to upgrade a RH installation with Apache 2.0.40 to .43.
> 
> Not to be pedantic, but the current "official" Apache HTTP 
> release is .43,
> regardless of whether Red Hat is current or not...it seems 
> reasonable to me
> that another Jakarta project would support that version and 
> not earlier
> versions.
> 
> For example:
> ftp://ftp.cise.ufl.edu/pub/mirrors/redhat-contrib/libc6/i386/h
> ttpd-2.0.43-1.
> i386.rpm
> 
> Most RH mirrors will have it.
> 
> John
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:20 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> >
> >
> > Yes, but when I go to the Linux dir it says
> >
> > "mod_jk-2.0.43.so is for Apache 2.0.42 (and 2.0.43) "
> >
> > It does not appear that a binary version is available that is
> > compatible
> > with Apache 2.0.40 (the version shipping with RedHat Linux 8
> > by the way).
> >
> > I am suprised this particular build is not available.  Is
> > there something I
> > am missing?  :(
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Neal
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 4:44 AM
> > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> >
> >
> >
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/
> > release/v1.2.2
> > /bin/linux/i386/
> >
> > Browse around in that tree to find others if needed.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 8:57 PM
> > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks.  I've never had to compile anything like this on
> > > Linux and am a
> > > little hesitant to do so (more of a windows guy to be
> > > honost).  Do you know
> > > of any place that I could locate pre-compiled *compatible*
> > > binaries for
> > > either apache 2.0.43 or mod_jk 2.0.40? Or some other 
> compatible set?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > Neal
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 1:23 PM
> > > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > You need Apache 2.0.43.  .42 might work, but .41 and .40 won't.
> > >
> > > Or, you can build your own.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
>

RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache

2003-01-20 Thread neal 
Actually, I was just trying to find binaries for compatible versions of
either Apache or mod_jk.  So, I wanted to find either (a) Apache 2.0.43 or
(b) Mod_jk 2.0.40.

Perhaps its me and my phobias of doing a src build on Linux (which I barely
know) but I am just not comfortable doing a src build. I presume I'd need to
download and learn some C compiler to do the task ... and that's on top of
barely knowing the OS!

Regarding the pedantics, *IF* the current supported version of Apache is
2.0.43 ... shouldn't there be binaries for it?  And even if not, should
there be binaries of mod_jk for 2.0.40?   It seems like an out-of-sync
doulbe whammy!

:(

Neal

-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:40 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache



Sorry, you lost me.  You asked for a link to mod_jk for Apache 2.0.43,
that's what I gave you.

.43 is the supported Apache version.  I don't use RPMs, but it should be
fairly trivial to upgrade a RH installation with Apache 2.0.40 to .43.

Not to be pedantic, but the current "official" Apache HTTP release is .43,
regardless of whether Red Hat is current or not...it seems reasonable to me
that another Jakarta project would support that version and not earlier
versions.

For example:
ftp://ftp.cise.ufl.edu/pub/mirrors/redhat-contrib/libc6/i386/httpd-2.0.43-1.
i386.rpm

Most RH mirrors will have it.

John

> -Original Message-
> From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:20 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
>
>
> Yes, but when I go to the Linux dir it says
>
> "mod_jk-2.0.43.so is for Apache 2.0.42 (and 2.0.43) "
>
> It does not appear that a binary version is available that is
> compatible
> with Apache 2.0.40 (the version shipping with RedHat Linux 8
> by the way).
>
> I am suprised this particular build is not available.  Is
> there something I
> am missing?  :(
>
> Thanks.
> Neal
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 4:44 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
>
>
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/
> release/v1.2.2
> /bin/linux/i386/
>
> Browse around in that tree to find others if needed.
>
> John
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 8:57 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> >
> >
> > Thanks.  I've never had to compile anything like this on
> > Linux and am a
> > little hesitant to do so (more of a windows guy to be
> > honost).  Do you know
> > of any place that I could locate pre-compiled *compatible*
> > binaries for
> > either apache 2.0.43 or mod_jk 2.0.40? Or some other compatible set?
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Neal
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 1:23 PM
> > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> >
> >
> >
> > You need Apache 2.0.43.  .42 might work, but .41 and .40 won't.
> >
> > Or, you can build your own.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:50 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know why I would get this error when installing
> > mod_JK 2.0.43 on
> > Linux 8, with Tomcat 4.1 and Apache 2.0:
> >
> > "mod_jk.c not compatible with this version of Apache".
> >
> > I presume that when it refers to the "mod_jk.c" it is
> referring to the
> > cmopuled code it derives from the LoadModule command to load
> > the so (?).
> >
> > I downloaded the mod_jk-2.0.43.so from the Apache connectors
> > archives.  I
> > just used the same version (but as a DLL) successfully on my windows
> > workstation.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Neal
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:36 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: RE: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command
> >
> >
> &

RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache

2003-01-20 Thread Turner, John 

Sorry, you lost me.  You asked for a link to mod_jk for Apache 2.0.43,
that's what I gave you.

.43 is the supported Apache version.  I don't use RPMs, but it should be
fairly trivial to upgrade a RH installation with Apache 2.0.40 to .43.  

Not to be pedantic, but the current "official" Apache HTTP release is .43,
regardless of whether Red Hat is current or not...it seems reasonable to me
that another Jakarta project would support that version and not earlier
versions.

For example:
ftp://ftp.cise.ufl.edu/pub/mirrors/redhat-contrib/libc6/i386/httpd-2.0.43-1.
i386.rpm  

Most RH mirrors will have it.

John

> -Original Message-
> From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:20 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> 
> 
> Yes, but when I go to the Linux dir it says
> 
> "mod_jk-2.0.43.so is for Apache 2.0.42 (and 2.0.43) "
> 
> It does not appear that a binary version is available that is 
> compatible
> with Apache 2.0.40 (the version shipping with RedHat Linux 8 
> by the way).
> 
> I am suprised this particular build is not available.  Is 
> there something I
> am missing?  :(
> 
> Thanks.
> Neal
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 4:44 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> 
> 
> 
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/
> release/v1.2.2
> /bin/linux/i386/
> 
> Browse around in that tree to find others if needed.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 8:57 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> >
> >
> > Thanks.  I've never had to compile anything like this on
> > Linux and am a
> > little hesitant to do so (more of a windows guy to be
> > honost).  Do you know
> > of any place that I could locate pre-compiled *compatible*
> > binaries for
> > either apache 2.0.43 or mod_jk 2.0.40? Or some other compatible set?
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Neal
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 1:23 PM
> > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> >
> >
> >
> > You need Apache 2.0.43.  .42 might work, but .41 and .40 won't.
> >
> > Or, you can build your own.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:50 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know why I would get this error when installing
> > mod_JK 2.0.43 on
> > Linux 8, with Tomcat 4.1 and Apache 2.0:
> >
> > "mod_jk.c not compatible with this version of Apache".
> >
> > I presume that when it refers to the "mod_jk.c" it is 
> referring to the
> > cmopuled code it derives from the LoadModule command to load
> > the so (?).
> >
> > I downloaded the mod_jk-2.0.43.so from the Apache connectors
> > archives.  I
> > just used the same version (but as a DLL) successfully on my windows
> > workstation.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Neal
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:36 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: RE: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command
> >
> >
> > John,
> >
> > Your tutorial ROCKS!
> >
> > It turns out there were 4 distinct problems which I was able
> > to identify in
> > part by using the Apache.exe and in part by comparing your
> > steps to the
> > collage I had compiled from other incomplete sources.
> >
> > My primary problem was that mod_jk.dll was not being recognized so I
> > replaced it with the build you were using
> > (mod_jk-2.0.43.dll) and from there is was pretty much home free!
> >
> > Now on to doing the same on the Linux server (I hope its reasonably
> > similar).  :)
> >
> > Thanks again.
> > Neal
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:22 AM
> > To: '

RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache

2003-01-20 Thread neal 
Yes, but when I go to the Linux dir it says

"mod_jk-2.0.43.so is for Apache 2.0.42 (and 2.0.43) "

It does not appear that a binary version is available that is compatible
with Apache 2.0.40 (the version shipping with RedHat Linux 8 by the way).

I am suprised this particular build is not available.  Is there something I
am missing?  :(

Thanks.
Neal


-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 4:44 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache



http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.2
/bin/linux/i386/

Browse around in that tree to find others if needed.

John


> -Original Message-
> From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 8:57 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
>
>
> Thanks.  I've never had to compile anything like this on
> Linux and am a
> little hesitant to do so (more of a windows guy to be
> honost).  Do you know
> of any place that I could locate pre-compiled *compatible*
> binaries for
> either apache 2.0.43 or mod_jk 2.0.40? Or some other compatible set?
>
> Thanks.
> Neal
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 1:23 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
>
>
>
> You need Apache 2.0.43.  .42 might work, but .41 and .40 won't.
>
> Or, you can build your own.
>
> John
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:50 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
>
>
> Does anyone know why I would get this error when installing
> mod_JK 2.0.43 on
> Linux 8, with Tomcat 4.1 and Apache 2.0:
>
> "mod_jk.c not compatible with this version of Apache".
>
> I presume that when it refers to the "mod_jk.c" it is referring to the
> cmopuled code it derives from the LoadModule command to load
> the so (?).
>
> I downloaded the mod_jk-2.0.43.so from the Apache connectors
> archives.  I
> just used the same version (but as a DLL) successfully on my windows
> workstation.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks.
> Neal
>
> -Original Message-
> From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:36 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command
>
>
> John,
>
> Your tutorial ROCKS!
>
> It turns out there were 4 distinct problems which I was able
> to identify in
> part by using the Apache.exe and in part by comparing your
> steps to the
> collage I had compiled from other incomplete sources.
>
> My primary problem was that mod_jk.dll was not being recognized so I
> replaced it with the build you were using
> (mod_jk-2.0.43.dll) and from there is was pretty much home free!
>
> Now on to doing the same on the Linux server (I hope its reasonably
> similar).  :)
>
> Thanks again.
> Neal
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:22 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command
>
>
>
> Uncomment those two lines.
>
> Then, open up a command window and call Apache like this:
>
> SOME_DRIVE:\SOME\PATH\TO\APACHE\BIN\APACHE.EXE -t
>
> This will check the syntax of Apache's httpd.conf without
> starting Apache.
> Fix the errors, then call it with "-t" again until you see
> "Syntax OK".
>
> The whole process is described in my HOWTO:
> http://www.johnturner.com/howto/winxp-howto.html
>
> While the version I use in my HOWTO is 4.1.18, the
> configuration steps are
> identical, just substitute "4.0.4" wherever you see "4.1.18".
>
> John
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 2:17 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command
> >
> >
> > I'm trying to setup ModJK for the first time between Apache 2.0 and
> > TOmcat 4.0.4, on Windows 2000.
> >
> > I am stuck with an error I was hoping someone might recognize:
> >
> > It tells me "invliad JKMount command. Perhaps mispelled or
> defined by
> > a module not included in the server configuration".
> >
> > I presume this is because I have commented out these lines:
> >
> > #LoadModule jk_module modules

RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache

2003-01-20 Thread Turner, John 

http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.2
/bin/linux/i386/

Browse around in that tree to find others if needed.

John


> -Original Message-
> From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 8:57 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> 
> 
> Thanks.  I've never had to compile anything like this on 
> Linux and am a
> little hesitant to do so (more of a windows guy to be 
> honost).  Do you know
> of any place that I could locate pre-compiled *compatible* 
> binaries for
> either apache 2.0.43 or mod_jk 2.0.40? Or some other compatible set?
> 
> Thanks.
> Neal
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 1:23 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> 
> 
> 
> You need Apache 2.0.43.  .42 might work, but .41 and .40 won't.
> 
> Or, you can build your own.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> -Original Message-----
> From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:50 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
> 
> 
> Does anyone know why I would get this error when installing 
> mod_JK 2.0.43 on
> Linux 8, with Tomcat 4.1 and Apache 2.0:
> 
> "mod_jk.c not compatible with this version of Apache".
> 
> I presume that when it refers to the "mod_jk.c" it is referring to the
> cmopuled code it derives from the LoadModule command to load 
> the so (?).
> 
> I downloaded the mod_jk-2.0.43.so from the Apache connectors 
> archives.  I
> just used the same version (but as a DLL) successfully on my windows
> workstation.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> Thanks.
> Neal
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:36 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command
> 
> 
> John,
> 
> Your tutorial ROCKS!
> 
> It turns out there were 4 distinct problems which I was able 
> to identify in
> part by using the Apache.exe and in part by comparing your 
> steps to the
> collage I had compiled from other incomplete sources.
> 
> My primary problem was that mod_jk.dll was not being recognized so I
> replaced it with the build you were using
> (mod_jk-2.0.43.dll) and from there is was pretty much home free!
> 
> Now on to doing the same on the Linux server (I hope its reasonably
> similar).  :)
> 
> Thanks again.
> Neal
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:22 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command
> 
> 
> 
> Uncomment those two lines.
> 
> Then, open up a command window and call Apache like this:
> 
> SOME_DRIVE:\SOME\PATH\TO\APACHE\BIN\APACHE.EXE -t
> 
> This will check the syntax of Apache's httpd.conf without 
> starting Apache.
> Fix the errors, then call it with "-t" again until you see 
> "Syntax OK".
> 
> The whole process is described in my HOWTO:
> http://www.johnturner.com/howto/winxp-howto.html
> 
> While the version I use in my HOWTO is 4.1.18, the 
> configuration steps are
> identical, just substitute "4.0.4" wherever you see "4.1.18".
> 
> John
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 2:17 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command
> >
> >
> > I'm trying to setup ModJK for the first time between Apache 2.0 and
> > TOmcat 4.0.4, on Windows 2000.
> >
> > I am stuck with an error I was hoping someone might recognize:
> >
> > It tells me "invliad JKMount command. Perhaps mispelled or 
> defined by
> > a module not included in the server configuration".
> >
> > I presume this is because I have commented out these lines:
> >
> > #LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
> > #AddModule mod_jk.c
> >
> > But if I *DONT* comment these out, the test configuration window
> > disappears almost as quickly as it appears and I can't see what the
> > problem is.  There
> > is nothing being logged, and if I try to start from the 
> Apache Service
> > manager I simply get a message stating "The requested
> > operation failed.".
> >
> >
> > Anyone know what's going on?  :(
> >
> > Th

RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache

2003-01-19 Thread neal 
Thanks.  I've never had to compile anything like this on Linux and am a
little hesitant to do so (more of a windows guy to be honost).  Do you know
of any place that I could locate pre-compiled *compatible* binaries for
either apache 2.0.43 or mod_jk 2.0.40? Or some other compatible set?

Thanks.
Neal

-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 1:23 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache



You need Apache 2.0.43.  .42 might work, but .41 and .40 won't.

Or, you can build your own.

John


-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:50 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache


Does anyone know why I would get this error when installing mod_JK 2.0.43 on
Linux 8, with Tomcat 4.1 and Apache 2.0:

"mod_jk.c not compatible with this version of Apache".

I presume that when it refers to the "mod_jk.c" it is referring to the
cmopuled code it derives from the LoadModule command to load the so (?).

I downloaded the mod_jk-2.0.43.so from the Apache connectors archives.  I
just used the same version (but as a DLL) successfully on my windows
workstation.

Any thoughts?

Thanks.
Neal

-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:36 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command


John,

Your tutorial ROCKS!

It turns out there were 4 distinct problems which I was able to identify in
part by using the Apache.exe and in part by comparing your steps to the
collage I had compiled from other incomplete sources.

My primary problem was that mod_jk.dll was not being recognized so I
replaced it with the build you were using
(mod_jk-2.0.43.dll) and from there is was pretty much home free!

Now on to doing the same on the Linux server (I hope its reasonably
similar).  :)

Thanks again.
Neal

-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:22 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command



Uncomment those two lines.

Then, open up a command window and call Apache like this:

SOME_DRIVE:\SOME\PATH\TO\APACHE\BIN\APACHE.EXE -t

This will check the syntax of Apache's httpd.conf without starting Apache.
Fix the errors, then call it with "-t" again until you see "Syntax OK".

The whole process is described in my HOWTO:
http://www.johnturner.com/howto/winxp-howto.html

While the version I use in my HOWTO is 4.1.18, the configuration steps are
identical, just substitute "4.0.4" wherever you see "4.1.18".

John


> -Original Message-
> From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 2:17 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command
>
>
> I'm trying to setup ModJK for the first time between Apache 2.0 and
> TOmcat 4.0.4, on Windows 2000.
>
> I am stuck with an error I was hoping someone might recognize:
>
> It tells me "invliad JKMount command. Perhaps mispelled or defined by
> a module not included in the server configuration".
>
> I presume this is because I have commented out these lines:
>
> #LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
> #AddModule mod_jk.c
>
> But if I *DONT* comment these out, the test configuration window
> disappears almost as quickly as it appears and I can't see what the
> problem is.  There
> is nothing being logged, and if I try to start from the Apache Service
> manager I simply get a message stating "The requested
> operation failed.".
>
>
> Anyone know what's going on?  :(
>
> Thanks.
> Neal
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.443 / Virus Database: 248 - Release Date: 1/10/2003


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.443 / Virus Database: 248 - Release Date: 1/10/2003


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache

2003-01-18 Thread Turner, John 

You need Apache 2.0.43.  .42 might work, but .41 and .40 won't.

Or, you can build your own.

John


-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:50 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache


Does anyone know why I would get this error when installing mod_JK 2.0.43 on
Linux 8, with Tomcat 4.1 and Apache 2.0:

"mod_jk.c not compatible with this version of Apache".

I presume that when it refers to the "mod_jk.c" it is referring to the
cmopuled code it derives from the LoadModule command to load the so (?).

I downloaded the mod_jk-2.0.43.so from the Apache connectors archives.  I
just used the same version (but as a DLL) successfully on my windows
workstation.

Any thoughts?

Thanks.
Neal

-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:36 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command


John,

Your tutorial ROCKS!

It turns out there were 4 distinct problems which I was able to identify in
part by using the Apache.exe and in part by comparing your steps to the
collage I had compiled from other incomplete sources.

My primary problem was that mod_jk.dll was not being recognized so I
replaced it with the build you were using
(mod_jk-2.0.43.dll) and from there is was pretty much home free!

Now on to doing the same on the Linux server (I hope its reasonably
similar).  :)

Thanks again.
Neal

-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:22 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command



Uncomment those two lines.

Then, open up a command window and call Apache like this:

SOME_DRIVE:\SOME\PATH\TO\APACHE\BIN\APACHE.EXE -t

This will check the syntax of Apache's httpd.conf without starting Apache.
Fix the errors, then call it with "-t" again until you see "Syntax OK".

The whole process is described in my HOWTO:
http://www.johnturner.com/howto/winxp-howto.html

While the version I use in my HOWTO is 4.1.18, the configuration steps are
identical, just substitute "4.0.4" wherever you see "4.1.18".

John


> -Original Message-
> From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 2:17 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command
>
>
> I'm trying to setup ModJK for the first time between Apache 2.0 and 
> TOmcat 4.0.4, on Windows 2000.
>
> I am stuck with an error I was hoping someone might recognize:
>
> It tells me "invliad JKMount command. Perhaps mispelled or defined by 
> a module not included in the server configuration".
>
> I presume this is because I have commented out these lines:
>
> #LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
> #AddModule mod_jk.c
>
> But if I *DONT* comment these out, the test configuration window 
> disappears almost as quickly as it appears and I can't see what the
> problem is.  There
> is nothing being logged, and if I try to start from the Apache Service
> manager I simply get a message stating "The requested
> operation failed.".
>
>
> Anyone know what's going on?  :(
>
> Thanks.
> Neal
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.443 / Virus Database: 248 - Release Date: 1/10/2003
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.443 / Virus Database: 248 - Release Date: 1/10/2003
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache

2003-01-17 Thread neal 
Does anyone know why I would get this error when installing mod_JK 2.0.43 on
Linux 8, with Tomcat 4.1 and Apache 2.0:

"mod_jk.c not compatible with this version of Apache".

I presume that when it refers to the "mod_jk.c" it is referring to the
cmopuled code it derives from the LoadModule command to load the so (?).

I downloaded the mod_jk-2.0.43.so from the Apache connectors archives.  I
just used the same version (but as a DLL) successfully on my windows
workstation.

Any thoughts?

Thanks.
Neal

-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:36 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command


John,

Your tutorial ROCKS!

It turns out there were 4 distinct problems which I was able to identify in
part by using the Apache.exe and in part by comparing your steps to the
collage I had compiled from other incomplete sources.

My primary problem was that mod_jk.dll was not being recognized so I
replaced it with the build you were using
(mod_jk-2.0.43.dll) and from there is was pretty much home free!

Now on to doing the same on the Linux server (I hope its reasonably
similar).  :)

Thanks again.
Neal

-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:22 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command



Uncomment those two lines.

Then, open up a command window and call Apache like this:

SOME_DRIVE:\SOME\PATH\TO\APACHE\BIN\APACHE.EXE -t

This will check the syntax of Apache's httpd.conf without starting Apache.
Fix the errors, then call it with "-t" again until you see "Syntax OK".

The whole process is described in my HOWTO:
http://www.johnturner.com/howto/winxp-howto.html

While the version I use in my HOWTO is 4.1.18, the configuration steps are
identical, just substitute "4.0.4" wherever you see "4.1.18".

John


> -Original Message-
> From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 2:17 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command
>
>
> I'm trying to setup ModJK for the first time between Apache
> 2.0 and TOmcat
> 4.0.4, on Windows 2000.
>
> I am stuck with an error I was hoping someone might recognize:
>
> It tells me "invliad JKMount command. Perhaps mispelled or
> defined by a
> module not included in the server configuration".
>
> I presume this is because I have commented out these lines:
>
> #LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
> #AddModule mod_jk.c
>
> But if I *DONT* comment these out, the test configuration
> window disappears
> almost as quickly as it appears and I can't see what the
> problem is.  There
> is nothing being logged, and if I try to start from the Apache Service
> manager I simply get a message stating "The requested
> operation failed.".
>
>
> Anyone know what's going on?  :(
>
> Thanks.
> Neal
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: mod_jk.c Compilation Errors

2002-09-04 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse 

Try configuring like this:

./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs

using your path to apxs.  If you don't have apxs on your system, you
probably should reinstall apache (with DSO support), from source is probably
preferrable.

Tom Veldhouse

- Original Message -
From: "Manoj Kithany" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 2:14 PM
Subject: mod_jk.c Compilation Errors


> Hi Experts,
>
> Greetings!
>
> I am using Apache(1.3) and Tomcat (4.0.4) on IBM AIX (5.1) System.
> I am havin high time in integrating APache and Tomcat. Binary "mod_jk" is
> NOT available for IBM AIX System - so I try to build it using following
> procedure but get ERRORS.
>
> I tried to execute "./buildconf.sh" and then execute "./configure" without
> having any problems. But when I execute "make" I get following Error -
> wonder why? It says "header" fiels are missing!!!
>
> Can you please look into this problem - would really appreciate your
> precious time. The Error is:
> --
> # make
> Making all in common
> Target "all" is up to date.
> Making all in apache-1.3
> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile
/usr/bin/gcc -DPACKAGE=\"mod_jk\"
> -DVERSION=\"1.2.0\" -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1  -I. -I. -I../comm
> on -g -O2 -c -o mod_jk.lo `test -f mod_jk.c || echo './'`mod_jk.c
> rm -f .libs/mod_jk.lo
> /usr/bin/gcc -DPACKAGE=\"mod_jk\" -DVERSION=\"1.2.0\" -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1 -I.
> -I. -I../common -g -O2 -c mod_jk.c  -DPIC -o .libs/mod_jk.lo
> mod_jk.c:71: ap_config.h: No such file or directory
> mod_jk.c:72: httpd.h: No such file or directory
> mod_jk.c:73: http_config.h: No such file or directory
> mod_jk.c:74: http_request.h: No such file or directory
> mod_jk.c:75: http_core.h: No such file or directory
> mod_jk.c:76: http_protocol.h: No such file or directory
> mod_jk.c:77: http_main.h: No such file or directory
> mod_jk.c:78: http_log.h: No such file or directory
> mod_jk.c:79: util_script.h: No such file or directory
> mod_jk.c:80: util_date.h: No such file or directory
> mod_jk.c:81: http_conf_globals.h: No such file or directory
> In file included from jk_global.h:68,
>  from jk_service.h:73,
>  from mod_jk.c:97:
> jk_version.h:80: warning: `PACKAGE' redefined
> *Initialization*:1: warning: this is the location of the previous
definition
> make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 1.
>
> Stop.
> make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 1.
>
> Stop.
> #
> 
>
> Any infor, from the above transcript would be appreciated!
>
> THANKS again.
>
> Manoj G. Kithany
>
>
>
> _
> MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
> http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:

> For additional commands, e-mail:

>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: mod_jk.c Compilation Errors

2002-09-04 Thread Peter T. Abplanalp 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 07:14:27PM +, Manoj Kithany wrote:
> /usr/bin/gcc -DPACKAGE=\"mod_jk\" -DVERSION=\"1.2.0\" -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1 -I. 
> -I. -I../common -g -O2 -c mod_jk.c  -DPIC -o .libs/mod_jk.lo
> mod_jk.c:71: ap_config.h: No such file or directory
> mod_jk.c:72: httpd.h: No such file or directory
> mod_jk.c:73: http_config.h: No such file or directory
> mod_jk.c:74: http_request.h: No such file or directory
> mod_jk.c:75: http_core.h: No such file or directory
> mod_jk.c:76: http_protocol.h: No such file or directory
> mod_jk.c:77: http_main.h: No such file or directory
> mod_jk.c:78: http_log.h: No such file or directory
> mod_jk.c:79: util_script.h: No such file or directory
> mod_jk.c:80: util_date.h: No such file or directory
> mod_jk.c:81: http_conf_globals.h: No such file or directory
> In file included from jk_global.h:68,
> from jk_service.h:73,
> from mod_jk.c:97:

two possibilities: 1) you don't have the apache source; or b) you
didn't tell gcc where to find the apache source.

- -- 
Peter Abplanalp

Email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP: pgp.mit.edu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9dlx+ggA8sH0iRXQRAgZCAKCWcH+mEddDR2nFuL96lSuDKOv46gCfQJ0A
T5NtMzUr3nbT1MwCSYFj0NY=
=YZWA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: mod_jk.c not compatible with Apache 2.0.39

2002-07-22 Thread eric 

Steve,

Your name rings a bell.  Maybe it's because we have a Burrus over here.  :-))

I downloaded the binary mod_jk-3.3-ap20.so  I've read where it's supposed to 
work with Apache 2.0.X and Tomcat 4.0.4.  If you get it to work please let me 
know.

http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1/bin/linux/i386

Hope this helps!
Eric


On Monday 22 July 2002 00:24, STEVE R BURRUS wrote:
>  Greetings Eric, this is steve burrus, you don't seem to know me at all,
> but I was just wondering if u could possibly send me the link to download
> the mod_jk file which facilitates the integration of Tomcat with the Apache
> HTTP Server?? Sorry that I cannot help u with your problem, but I FEEL YOUR
> PAIN!!!   :)
> ***
>
>
> --- eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Greetings!
> >
> > Spent the day trying to get Apache 2.0.39 to coexist with Tomcat 4.0.4. 
> > Seems as if every article/how to/etc has something different.  Downloaded
> > Ant 1.5 and I get compile errors when I try to compile connectors-4.0.4
> > :-((
> >
> > I've downloaded mod_jk-3.3-ap20.so
> >
> > My workers.properties file is:
> >
> > workers.tomcat_home=/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4
> > workers.java_home=$(JAVA_HOME)
> > ps=/
> >
> > worker.list=ajp13, ajp14
> > worker.ajp13.port=8009
> > worker.ajp13.host=localhost
> > worker.ajp13.type=ajp13
> > worker.ajp13.lbfactor=1
> >
> > worker.ajp14.port=8010
> > worker.ajp14.host=localhost
> > worker.ajp14.type=ajp14
> > worker.ajp14.secretkey=secret
> > worker.ajp14.credentials=myveryrandomentropy
> > worker.ajp14.lbfactor=1
> >
> > worker.loadbalancer.type=lb
> > worker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers=ajp13
> > worker.inprocess.type=jni
> > worker.inprocess.class_path=$(workers.tomcat_home)$(ps)lib$(ps)tomcat.jar
> > worker.inprocess.cmd_line=start
>
> worker.inprocess.jvm_lib=$(workers.java_home)$(ps)jre$(ps)bin$(ps)classic$(
>ps)libjvm.so
>
> > worker.inprocess.stdout=$(workers.tomcat_home)$(ps)logs$(ps)inprocess.std
> >out
> > worker.inprocess.stderr=$(workers.tomcat_home)$(ps)logs$(ps)inprocess.std
> >err
> >
> > At the end of httpd.conf I put:
> >
> > Include /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4/conf/auto/mod_jk.conf
> >
> > JkWorkersFile
> > "/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4/conf/jk/workers.properties" JkLogFile
> > "/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4/logs/mod_jk.log"
> >
> > JkLogLevel debug
> >
> > JkMount /examples ajp13
> > JkMount /examples/* ajp13
> >
> > JkMount /jk ajp13
> > JkMount /jk/* ajp13
> >
> > JkMount /cocoon ajp13
> > JkMount /cocoon/* ajp13
> >
> > When I run apachectl configtest I get
> >
> > httpd:  module "mod_jk.c" is not compatible with this version of Apache.
> > Please contact the vendor for the correct version.
> >
> > Ok, where is the correct version?  I wish there was a search capability
> > on the jakarta.apache.org website.
> >
> > Eric
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
> >  For additional
> > commands, e-mail: 
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
> http://sbc.yahoo.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: mod_jk.c not compatible with Apache 2.0.39

2002-07-21 Thread Pae Choi 

The source, i.e., under "include" direcotry, in Apache/HTTPd has
changed its function names; so the source in "mod_jk" modules
referencing them *certainly* will not make your compiler happy at all.


Pae


- Original Message -
From: "STEVE R BURRUS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: mod_jk.c not compatible with Apache 2.0.39


> Greetings Eric, this is steve burrus, you don't seem to know me at all,
but I was
> just wondering if u could possibly send me the link to download the mod_jk
file
> which facilitates the integration of Tomcat with the Apache HTTP Server??
Sorry
> that I cannot help u with your problem, but I FEEL YOUR PAIN!!!   :)
>

***
>
> --- eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Greetings!
> >
> > Spent the day trying to get Apache 2.0.39 to coexist with Tomcat 4.0.4.
Seems
> > as if every article/how to/etc has something different.  Downloaded Ant
1.5
> > and I get compile errors when I try to compile connectors-4.0.4 :-((
> >
> > I've downloaded mod_jk-3.3-ap20.so
> >
> > My workers.properties file is:
> >
> > workers.tomcat_home=/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4
> > workers.java_home=$(JAVA_HOME)
> > ps=/
> >
> > worker.list=ajp13, ajp14
> > worker.ajp13.port=8009
> > worker.ajp13.host=localhost
> > worker.ajp13.type=ajp13
> > worker.ajp13.lbfactor=1
> >
> > worker.ajp14.port=8010
> > worker.ajp14.host=localhost
> > worker.ajp14.type=ajp14
> > worker.ajp14.secretkey=secret
> > worker.ajp14.credentials=myveryrandomentropy
> > worker.ajp14.lbfactor=1
> >
> > worker.loadbalancer.type=lb
> > worker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers=ajp13
> > worker.inprocess.type=jni
> >
worker.inprocess.class_path=$(workers.tomcat_home)$(ps)lib$(ps)tomcat.jar
> > worker.inprocess.cmd_line=start
> >
>
worker.inprocess.jvm_lib=$(workers.java_home)$(ps)jre$(ps)bin$(ps)classic$(p
s)libjvm.so
> >
worker.inprocess.stdout=$(workers.tomcat_home)$(ps)logs$(ps)inprocess.stdout
> >
worker.inprocess.stderr=$(workers.tomcat_home)$(ps)logs$(ps)inprocess.stderr
> >
> > At the end of httpd.conf I put:
> >
> > Include /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4/conf/auto/mod_jk.conf
> >
> > JkWorkersFile
"/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4/conf/jk/workers.properties"
> > JkLogFile "/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4/logs/mod_jk.log"
> >
> > JkLogLevel debug
> >
> > JkMount /examples ajp13
> > JkMount /examples/* ajp13
> >
> > JkMount /jk ajp13
> > JkMount /jk/* ajp13
> >
> > JkMount /cocoon ajp13
> > JkMount /cocoon/* ajp13
> >
> > When I run apachectl configtest I get
> >
> > httpd:  module "mod_jk.c" is not compatible with this version of Apache.
> > Please contact the vendor for the correct version.
> >
> > Ok, where is the correct version?  I wish there was a search capability
on the
> > jakarta.apache.org website.
> >
> > Eric
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: mod_jk.c not compatible with Apache 2.0.39

2002-07-21 Thread STEVE R BURRUS 

 Greetings Eric, this is steve burrus, you don't seem to know me at all, but I was
just wondering if u could possibly send me the link to download the mod_jk file
which facilitates the integration of Tomcat with the Apache HTTP Server?? Sorry
that I cannot help u with your problem, but I FEEL YOUR PAIN!!!   :)
***

--- eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings!
> 
> Spent the day trying to get Apache 2.0.39 to coexist with Tomcat 4.0.4.  Seems 
> as if every article/how to/etc has something different.  Downloaded Ant 1.5 
> and I get compile errors when I try to compile connectors-4.0.4 :-((
> 
> I've downloaded mod_jk-3.3-ap20.so
> 
> My workers.properties file is:
> 
> workers.tomcat_home=/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4
> workers.java_home=$(JAVA_HOME)
> ps=/
> 
> worker.list=ajp13, ajp14
> worker.ajp13.port=8009
> worker.ajp13.host=localhost
> worker.ajp13.type=ajp13
> worker.ajp13.lbfactor=1
> 
> worker.ajp14.port=8010
> worker.ajp14.host=localhost
> worker.ajp14.type=ajp14
> worker.ajp14.secretkey=secret
> worker.ajp14.credentials=myveryrandomentropy
> worker.ajp14.lbfactor=1
> 
> worker.loadbalancer.type=lb
> worker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers=ajp13
> worker.inprocess.type=jni
> worker.inprocess.class_path=$(workers.tomcat_home)$(ps)lib$(ps)tomcat.jar
> worker.inprocess.cmd_line=start
>
worker.inprocess.jvm_lib=$(workers.java_home)$(ps)jre$(ps)bin$(ps)classic$(ps)libjvm.so
> worker.inprocess.stdout=$(workers.tomcat_home)$(ps)logs$(ps)inprocess.stdout
> worker.inprocess.stderr=$(workers.tomcat_home)$(ps)logs$(ps)inprocess.stderr
> 
> At the end of httpd.conf I put:
> 
> Include /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4/conf/auto/mod_jk.conf
> 
> JkWorkersFile "/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4/conf/jk/workers.properties"
> JkLogFile "/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4/logs/mod_jk.log"
> 
> JkLogLevel debug
> 
> JkMount /examples ajp13
> JkMount /examples/* ajp13
> 
> JkMount /jk ajp13
> JkMount /jk/* ajp13
> 
> JkMount /cocoon ajp13
> JkMount /cocoon/* ajp13
> 
> When I run apachectl configtest I get
> 
> httpd:  module "mod_jk.c" is not compatible with this version of Apache.  
> Please contact the vendor for the correct version.
> 
> Ok, where is the correct version?  I wish there was a search capability on the 
> jakarta.apache.org website.
> 
> Eric
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
> 
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: mod_jk.c

2001-03-01 Thread Xu, Lifeng 

I am also new to mod_jk, but I think if you are running NT, you don't load
mod_jk.c. What you need is mod_jk.dll.

I could be wrong though. Like I said, I am new too. So take my advise in
your own risk...:)

Good luck.

Lifeng

-Original Message-
From: Chris Andreou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 9:25 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: mod_jk.c


I am using NT, Apache 3.2.1 and Tomcat.  Does anybody know why I get an
error by loading the mod_jk.c ? 

Thanks

Chris

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]