RE: Re[2]: Running Tomcat as Non-Root

2003-07-28 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
No, this shouldn't be a problem if you setup tomcat correctly.

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/proxy-howto.html
(Note: I havn't tried it on my own)


Most documentation that I found about the configuration of tomcat 
for running as non root on port  1024 are missing this point:
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/l-secjav.htm
http://www.klawitter.de/tomcat80.html

Here is one in german that includes this topic:
http://3plus4software.de/news/20020617.html
(Even without understanding german, you should be able
to find the relevant information)

 -Original Message-
 From: Anton Tagunov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 7:45 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re[2]: Running Tomcat as Non-Root
 
 
 Hello Ralph!
 
 RE You can run a java service on ports  1024 without being 
 root with 
 RE portmappers, proxies, iptables and several other tools
 
 Hmm.., but won't this make the
 request.getRequestURI()
 and alike create incorrect URL-s, like
 
 http://smth.smth.smth:8080/aaa/b.jsp
 
 instead of
 
 http://smth.smth.smth:80/aaa/b.jsp
 
 or
 
 http://smth.smth.smth/aaa/b.jsp
 
 
 This might be a big problem!

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re[2]: Running Tomcat as Non-Root

2003-07-27 Thread Anton Tagunov
Hello Ralph!

RE You can run a java service on ports  1024 without being root with 
RE portmappers, proxies, iptables and several other tools

Hmm.., but won't this make the
request.getRequestURI()
and alike create incorrect URL-s, like

http://smth.smth.smth:8080/aaa/b.jsp

instead of

http://smth.smth.smth:80/aaa/b.jsp

or

http://smth.smth.smth/aaa/b.jsp


This might be a big problem!

-Anton


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re[2]: Running Tomcat as Non-Root

2003-07-19 Thread Anton Tagunov
Hello Gabriel!

LG So I'm going to take that as a no. No one has bothered to pester sun
LG about this. 

LG So I realize that its possible that you could only drop privs down to a
LG single user in the vm, but gee wouldn't that be hugely better then what
LG we have today, where if I want to run 1024 I have to run as superuser?

LG Surely you can see the benefit.

1)
Looks there might be some sense in such an api.

2)
On the other hand we go somewhat OS specific
here - only *nix-es, don't we?

3)
In fact we do not strictly have to ask Sun for this,
we can do it with JNI.

Would be interested to see how
jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon do it.


4)
I would vote for such feature request at Sun.
Go ahead add it!

-Anton


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]