RE: mod_webapp (was: Re: TOMCAT-STANDALONE needed with Apache Server?)
I'm sure the developers would appreciate a patch if you don't think the default server.xml is setup appropriately. It doesn't matter to me one way or the other...I just comment out the connectors I'm not using. John -Original Message- From: Mark R. Diggory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 6:13 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: mod_webapp (was: Re: TOMCAT-STANDALONE needed with Apache Server?) Hi all, This is a little confusing, I notice that in 4.1's server.xml file it still has the WARP connector as the default example of connecting up to apache. If what you say is the case, should this be mod_jk instead? i.e. Shouldn't this be a more appropriate connector example that works on both Windows and other platforms, expecially if mod_webapp is dead? Cheers, -Mark !-- The MOD_WEBAPP connector is used to connect Apache 1.3 with Tomcat 4.0 as its servlet container. Please read the README.txt file coming with the WebApp Module distribution on how to build it. (Or check out the jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp CVS repository) To configure the Apache side, you must ensure that you have the ServerName and Port directives defined in httpd.conf. Then, lines like these to the bottom of your httpd.conf file: LoadModule webapp_module libexec/mod_webapp.so WebAppConnection warpConnection warp localhost:8008 WebAppDeploy examples warpConnection /examples/ The next time you restart Apache (after restarting Tomcat, if needed) the connection will be established, and all applications you make visible via WebAppDeploy directives can be accessed through Apache. -- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOMCAT-STANDALONE needed with Apache Server?
I'm new to the world of Apache and Jakarta. I notice TOMCAT by default has the TOMCAT-STANDALONE instance defined by default, and the TOMCAT-APACHE instance commented out with no connectors, etc defined. I loaded Apache 2.0 and TOMCAT 4.0 on my Win 2K Svr box. Do I NEED the stand-alone instance of TOMCAT? Do I need all those connectors on the different ports? What is used by the mod_jk interface from Apache to TOMCAT? I tried mod_webapp, but Apache said it could not find it even though I DL'd a win32 version of the .so and accompanying libapr.dll to the MODULES directory. (I went back to the mod_jk method) I have read multiple pages on setting up TOMCAT, and all seem to be different or not appropriate for my needs. Anyone have a good page to help me setup Apache/Tomcat and JSP/SERVLETS/BEANS on a WINDOWS 2000 SERVER? Thanks -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TOMCAT-STANDALONE needed with Apache Server?
First, you don't need Apache. Tomcat works just fine in stand-alone mode. Don't bother with Apache and connectors unless you absolutely need it, or have aversions to running Tomcat on port 80. Second, stay away from mod_webapp (WARP). AFAIK, it isn't active anymore, and it wasn't finished when the activity stopped anyway. The current stable connector is mod_jk (JK/AJP13). Also available is mod_jk2 (JK2), but that has been designated as beta by the team. Choose the one you want to use. Third, there are several HOWTOs for Windows and other platforms, like this one from Robert Sowders using JK2: ftp://pokey.wr.usgs.gov/pub/rsowders/Apache2_Jk2_TC4.1.x_JSDK1.4.zip Search the archives for others. If you choose to use Tomcat in stand-alone, you don't need any of the other connectors enabled in server.xml. Conversely, if you do decide to go the Apache + connector route, you don't need the stand-alone connector enabled in server.xml. Just comment out the connectors you don't need and restart Tomcat. The default connector for JK is port 8009, I believe. John -Original Message- From: Chris Wolcott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:50 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: TOMCAT-STANDALONE needed with Apache Server? I'm new to the world of Apache and Jakarta. I notice TOMCAT by default has the TOMCAT-STANDALONE instance defined by default, and the TOMCAT-APACHE instance commented out with no connectors, etc defined. I loaded Apache 2.0 and TOMCAT 4.0 on my Win 2K Svr box. Do I NEED the stand-alone instance of TOMCAT? Do I need all those connectors on the different ports? What is used by the mod_jk interface from Apache to TOMCAT? I tried mod_webapp, but Apache said it could not find it even though I DL'd a win32 version of the .so and accompanying libapr.dll to the MODULES directory. (I went back to the mod_jk method) I have read multiple pages on setting up TOMCAT, and all seem to be different or not appropriate for my needs. Anyone have a good page to help me setup Apache/Tomcat and JSP/SERVLETS/BEANS on a WINDOWS 2000 SERVER? Thanks -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mod_webapp (was: Re: TOMCAT-STANDALONE needed with Apache Server?)
Hi all, This is a little confusing, I notice that in 4.1's server.xml file it still has the WARP connector as the default example of connecting up to apache. If what you say is the case, should this be mod_jk instead? i.e. Shouldn't this be a more appropriate connector example that works on both Windows and other platforms, expecially if mod_webapp is dead? Cheers, -Mark !-- The MOD_WEBAPP connector is used to connect Apache 1.3 with Tomcat 4.0 as its servlet container. Please read the README.txt file coming with the WebApp Module distribution on how to build it. (Or check out the jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp CVS repository) To configure the Apache side, you must ensure that you have the ServerName and Port directives defined in httpd.conf. Then, lines like these to the bottom of your httpd.conf file: LoadModule webapp_module libexec/mod_webapp.so WebAppConnection warpConnection warp localhost:8008 WebAppDeploy examples warpConnection /examples/ The next time you restart Apache (after restarting Tomcat, if needed) the connection will be established, and all applications you make visible via WebAppDeploy directives can be accessed through Apache. -- !-- Define an Apache-Connector Service -- !-- Service name=Tomcat-Apache Connector className=org.apache.catalina.connector.warp.WarpConnector port=8008 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true appBase=webapps acceptCount=10 debug=0/ Engine className=org.apache.catalina.connector.warp.WarpEngine name=Apache debug=0 Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=apache_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ Realm className=org.apache.catalina.realm.MemoryRealm / /Engine /Service Turner, John wrote: First, you don't need Apache. Tomcat works just fine in stand-alone mode. Don't bother with Apache and connectors unless you absolutely need it, or have aversions to running Tomcat on port 80. Second, stay away from mod_webapp (WARP). AFAIK, it isn't active anymore, and it wasn't finished when the activity stopped anyway. The current stable connector is mod_jk (JK/AJP13). Also available is mod_jk2 (JK2), but that has been designated as beta by the team. Choose the one you want to use. Third, there are several HOWTOs for Windows and other platforms, like this one from Robert Sowders using JK2: ftp://pokey.wr.usgs.gov/pub/rsowders/Apache2_Jk2_TC4.1.x_JSDK1.4.zip Search the archives for others. If you choose to use Tomcat in stand-alone, you don't need any of the other connectors enabled in server.xml. Conversely, if you do decide to go the Apache + connector route, you don't need the stand-alone connector enabled in server.xml. Just comment out the connectors you don't need and restart Tomcat. The default connector for JK is port 8009, I believe. John -Original Message- From: Chris Wolcott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:50 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: TOMCAT-STANDALONE needed with Apache Server? I'm new to the world of Apache and Jakarta. I notice TOMCAT by default has the TOMCAT-STANDALONE instance defined by default, and the TOMCAT-APACHE instance commented out with no connectors, etc defined. I loaded Apache 2.0 and TOMCAT 4.0 on my Win 2K Svr box. Do I NEED the stand-alone instance of TOMCAT? Do I need all those connectors on the different ports? What is used by the mod_jk interface from Apache to TOMCAT? I tried mod_webapp, but Apache said it could not find it even though I DL'd a win32 version of the .so and accompanying libapr.dll to the MODULES directory. (I went back to the mod_jk method) I have read multiple pages on setting up TOMCAT, and all seem to be different or not appropriate for my needs. Anyone have a good page to help me setup Apache/Tomcat and JSP/SERVLETS/BEANS on a WINDOWS 2000 SERVER? Thanks -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_webapp (was: Re: TOMCAT-STANDALONE needed with Apache Server?)
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Mark R. Diggory wrote: Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 18:13:17 -0400 From: Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mod_webapp (was: Re: TOMCAT-STANDALONE needed with Apache Server?) Hi all, This is a little confusing, I notice that in 4.1's server.xml file it still has the WARP connector as the default example of connecting up to apache. If what you say is the case, should this be mod_jk instead? i.e. Shouldn't this be a more appropriate connector example that works on both Windows and other platforms, expecially if mod_webapp is dead? There is also a mod_jk connector in the default configuration (on port 8009). The difference is that jk doesn't require a custom service/engine/context hierarchy -- it uses the standard one. Cheers, -Mark Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_webapp (was: Re: TOMCAT-STANDALONE needed with Apache Server?)
By default, the WARP connector, and Tomcat-Apache service are commented out. They are included as examples if you want to use them, but the default connector is the Coyote/JK2 connector. My suggestion would be to use JK or JK2 to connect Apache and Tomcat. It is a reasonably well documented process (compared to other connectors) and there are a lot of examples available. The other easy alternative is to change the connector for HTTP/1.1 from port 8080 to port 80, and only use Tomcat. -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 11 October 2002 11:24 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_webapp (was: Re: TOMCAT-STANDALONE needed with Apache Server?) On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Mark R. Diggory wrote: Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 18:13:17 -0400 From: Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mod_webapp (was: Re: TOMCAT-STANDALONE needed with Apache Server?) Hi all, This is a little confusing, I notice that in 4.1's server.xml file it still has the WARP connector as the default example of connecting up to apache. If what you say is the case, should this be mod_jk instead? i.e. Shouldn't this be a more appropriate connector example that works on both Windows and other platforms, expecially if mod_webapp is dead? There is also a mod_jk connector in the default configuration (on port 8009). The difference is that jk doesn't require a custom service/engine/context hierarchy -- it uses the standard one. Cheers, -Mark Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
