Re: mod_jk vs ApacheModuleJServ.dll
Scott: I don't do windows so I may be a bit off base. There is some reference in the Tomcat user's guide on the difference between Tomcat (with mod_jserv) and Jserv. Then in the still newer documentation with release 3.1.14 there is a brief comparison of mod_jserv and mod_jk. The bottom line as I understand it is that mod_jk is the recommended successor to mod_jserv and replaces it. -- Tom Woteki, a.k.a. Dr. Wo mail to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 202-544-2743 (fax) Can someone point me towards docs or tell me what the difference is between mod_jk and ApacheModuleJServ.dll. They are both used for Apache to communicate with Tomcat correct? Does one replace the other? Am I clueless? Thanks, -Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mod_jk vs ApacheModuleJServ.dll
Can someone point me towards docs or tell me what the difference is between mod_jk and ApacheModuleJServ.dll. They are both used for Apache to communicate with Tomcat correct? Does one replace the other? Am I clueless? Thanks, -Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mod_jk vs ApacheModuleJserv.dll on WinNT
I'm a little confused. In the documentation on http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/jakarta-tomcat/src/doc/mod_jk-howto.html It recommends that, if you're including tomcat.conf or tomcat-apache.conf in the Apache httpd.conf file, you should remove these to use the mod_jk module instead of the mod_jserv. Should we be using the mod_jk instead of the ApacheModuleJserv.dll ?? Thanks for your input, Bill Stearns --
