Re: Topband: Conditions on 160m for ARRL Contest
Conditions down here also in SE USA. I had over 150 Q in 62 countries doing an all out effort both nights. I did work G3YRO who was commenting on condition and someone mentioned the GM5A station on the water. They had decent signals both nights. Yes being near the coast makes more of a difference than what theory dictates I think. I have a friend that lives in a salt marsh with very minimal antennas and he hears 160 stuff that I never hear inland with a large selection of receiving antennas. The last 4 or 5 years have been down for me compared to years prior to that. Hopefully things will swing up next year as the flux has pretty much bottomed out. 73 Mike K4PI _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: 160 4 SQUARE
Greg, N4CC,, I have been using something similar to what you are describing for about 10 years. I have 140 ft of Rohn 25 with all Phillystrand guys. The 4 verticals are supported by nylon cords running from the top of the tower. The height of the tower allows me to have 90 ft verticals plus around 45 ft top hats at the proper spacing between verticals. I am using a Comtek phasing box. At present around 40 135 ft radials on each vertical. I never detuned the tower as the F/B and F/S have always been excellent so I did not see the need. I did look into it but decided to leave as it was. It has been a very competitive transmit system. If you need any further details contact me. 73 Mike K4PI _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: SimplEx Torque Sleeve
Does anyone have experience with the PPC SimplEx Torque Sleeves for F connectors? They make taking F connectors on and off a breeze without having a tool. Supposedly they work with PPC EX type F connectors but wonder if anyone has tried them on other brands. I could not find a distributor that sells just sleeves in small quantities. Comcast uses them on their installations. I use a lot of F connectors on the receive antenna systems and it would be nice to have these sleeves available. 73 Mike K4PI _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: A Tale of a Successful 160 meter RFI Hunt
That is interesting Frank as I was just at K4TEA’s QTH yesterday trying to find why he had more noise from one direction that had no signature of any type, just higher background from 1.7 Mhz up to around 2.5 Mhz. 80 M is fine. He is near an interstate so maybe there is something similar out there. I built a large DF loop for 160 I can haul on a pickup to use with my K3. We moved from location to location trying to triangulate on it but we felt it was going to be within .5 miles but I see your source was 2 miles away. Thanks for the input. Keep us posted on your success on getting it turned off. 73 Mike K4PI _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: DXE 4 square
I just reinstalled a DXE 4 ele receive system I had at another location here at home. I have what sounds like AC riding on signals when I am on antenna positions 2,3, and 4 but only hear it on 80 Meters. Position 1 is okay. Sounds like fuzz riding on the CW signals. Anyone with with a DXC 4 square run into anything like that? My regular antennas sound okay. _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: RX PREAMPS
I have used the HI Z rx system and also the DXE ones. HI Z said in the past no need for a sequencer to get power off the amps if the xmit ant was close to the rx system antennas. Close I would say 60 foot. DXE has always suggested using a sequencer to get power off the amps during xmit. I am going to be forced to move a DXE system within 65 ft or so of my 160 vertical and wonder if anyone has had any experience of using the DXE without a sequencer close to their xmit antenna. Just hate to install one more thing I could get around but will if absolutely necessary. I know moving it closer is not an ideal situation but you do what you have to. Any input? 73 Mike K4PI _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 154, Issue 18
Hi Peter, I have built many 160 T’s and they always come out best with the vertical height + the horizontal top equaling around 135 – 140 ft for 1820. I know you mentioned 1900 but you can scale that from these numbers. I have several with 90 ft vertical and 45 top wire and friends with 70 vertical and 65 horiz top wire. The lengths will change as you add more radials but once over 20-25 the freq change should become minor so I would not do a lot of adjustments until you get some radials on it. These numbers will vary a small amount per location of course but this should be close. I usually put the antenna as high as possible and not trim the vertical. I adjust the top hat on both ends. I know that is more trouble but that way you get to maintain all the vertical height possible for your location. I feed mine direct with a very small mismatch. GL 73 Mike K4PI From: topband-requ...@contesting.com Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 12:00 PM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Topband Digest, Vol 154, Issue 18 Send Topband mailing list submissions to topband@contesting.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to topband-requ...@contesting.com You can reach the person managing the list at topband-ow...@contesting.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Topband digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Tee Antenna dimensioning (Peter Bacon) 2. Re: Pre Stew - N3A (Joe Galicic) 3. BOG antenna research at HC1PF ( K1FZ-Bruce ) -- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:20:46 +0100 From: Peter BaconTo: topband@contesting.com Subject: Topband: Tee Antenna dimensioning Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Advise please on the formula to calculate the lengths of the horizontal elements for a 160m Tee antenna. Currently I have a 60 foot vertical wire suspended between the trees, with a long horizontal section making an inverted L, but want to change it to a Tee. I am looking to resonate the antenna around 1.9 MHz and then bring it down with a hairpin match. Thanks Peter G3ZSS -- Message: 2 Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 13:45:07 + (UTC) From: Joe Galicic To: "List, TopBand" Subject: Re: Topband: Pre Stew - N3A Message-ID: <793005858.5188916.1445175907791.javamail.zim...@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Thanks to everyone for all the Q's and patience digging my QRP signal out. I made 103 contacts with many 6 & 9 point contacts and four 12 and 15 point contacts. Those were a real challenge. Overall band conditions were great with low QRN and local noise. I had a blast ! -73 Joe N3A/N3HEE - Original Message - From: "Joe Galicic" To: "TopBand List" Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 9:53:12 AM Subject: Topband: Pre Stew - N3A I will be operating the Pre Stew as N3A (NAQCC Special Event Station). I will be QRP at 5 watts. I hope to work a bunch of you ! Thanks -Joe N3HEE _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband -- Message: 3 Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 11:47:22 -0400 From: " K1FZ-Bruce " To: Topband Subject: Topband: BOG antenna research at HC1PF Message-ID: <20151018114722.gxslmib04cgkg...@webmail.myfairpoint.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 ? Luis, IV3PRK/HC1PF? has been instrumental in BOG antenna research. He has brought together information from some of the top BOG antenna users/researchers, and an antenna plotting expert. He has?constructed BOG antennas that helped over come noise at HC1PF his 2nd QTH near the equator.? ? http://www.iv3prk.it/new-page.htm ? ? 73 Bruce-K1FZ -- Subject: Digest Footer ___ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband -- End of Topband Digest, Vol 154, Issue 18 _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: The Remote Question..
Sad indeed to see the post this morning. The idiom “the means justify the end” is true in this case for sure. I guess eventually the rules will say lets just call them on the phone and exchange reports, as we are near that with remotes now. That makes it easier and I guess that is what everyone wants as in school, if too many students are failing lets make the test easier. I will not take the easy way out to increase my Challenge totals although that is my primary goal in radio these days. The spirit and challenge of what DXCC was meant to be has eroded for sure. If that makes you feel good jumping coast to coast for the best prop, go for it. I always wondered why I was being beat out on 160 and 6 by certain 4 land stations and I can ignore their Challenge totals now that I know they don’t really believe it is a true Challenge. Don’t use technology as part of the argument. 73 Mike K4PI _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: WD1A
Hi Roger, I use a 800 ft bi directional beverage using the WD1A wire. I am using the transformers sold by KD9SV to feed and terminate it. I use some small nylon cord to help support it between each rigid support. It does fairly well but have no way to compare it to a single wire in that direction. On paper it does not look very good and some day I may change over to two separated copper or copper weld wires but this was easier at the time I needed it. GL on whatever you decide. 73 Mike K4PI _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 147, Issue 19
Hi Bill, Just to see what would happen I even took the top off with the blow touch right on the material and it would just glow and never ignite. I am thinking the material has gotten old and not longer wants to ignite. I would think the blow torch would be as hot as any spark. Any other comments welcome. I am going to try another container of the igniter but they have all been stored in the same area possibly 10 years. 73 Mike From: topband-requ...@contesting.com Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:00 PM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Topband Digest, Vol 147, Issue 19 Send Topband mailing list submissions to topband@contesting.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to topband-requ...@contesting.com You can reach the person managing the list at topband-ow...@contesting.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Topband digest... Today's Topics: 1. Re: CADWELLS (Bill Wichers) 2. Re: CADWELLS (Art Snapper) 3. Re: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests (Kris Mraz) 4. Re: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests (Andy Blank) 5. Re: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests (Stan Stockton) 6. Re: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests (W0MU Mike Fatchett) 7. Fw: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests (k1fz) 8. Re: What IS troubling about this report (Walt) -- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 02:11:00 + From: Bill Wichers bi...@waveform.net To: Cecil chac...@cableone.net Cc: TOPBAND TOPBAND@CONTESTING.COM, Mike Greenway k...@bellsouth.net Subject: Re: Topband: CADWELLS Message-ID: 2fb91b25-63dd-4b9a-931f-583d0e1ca...@waveform.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Just to add: the spark igniter is a flint-type unit. Those used for starting a torch would probably work too but would be more difficult to aim into the mold than the gun-like cadweld ones are. -Bill Sent from my iPhone On Mar 16, 2015, at 9:35 PM, Cecil chac...@cableone.net wrote: There is a spark igniter that is used with cadweld...I've had trouble lighting them off with a propane torch. Usually if they have been stored in a dry location they are good for years. The blue tube is loaded with an igniting compound in the bottom...so it is the last thing that goes into the mold and a small amount of it is trailed over the edge to facilitate lighting once the lid is closed. So just any of the powder won't light off you have to light off the starter powder. Cecil Sent using recycled electrons. On Mar 16, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Mike Greenway k...@bellsouth.net wrote: I some have old style Cadwell that require lighting off with a torch. I have had them for many years and apparently the chemical mixture has gotten too old to fire off as I tried one today and just no reaction. Has anyone run into this before? Don?t guess there anything easily mixed up to replace the thermo compound. 73 Mike K4PI _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband -- Message: 2 Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:57:50 -0400 From: Art Snapper a...@nk8x.net Cc: TOPBAND TOPBAND@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: CADWELLS Message-ID: CAH6Jzym390g=l0nmzcgxrybnhncbre7fespf65eqzpfb1up...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sparklers (kids fireworks) can be an effective fuse for Cadwelds. It even works in the rain. 73 Art On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Bill Wichers bi...@waveform.net wrote: Just to add: the spark igniter is a flint-type unit. Those used for starting a torch would probably work too but would be more difficult to aim into the mold than the gun-like cadweld ones are. -Bill Sent from my iPhone On Mar 16, 2015, at 9:35 PM, Cecil chac...@cableone.net wrote: There is a spark igniter that is used with cadweld...I've had trouble lighting them off with a propane torch. Usually if they have been stored in a dry location they are good for years. The blue tube is loaded with an igniting compound in the bottom...so it is the last thing that goes into the mold and a small amount of it is trailed over the edge to facilitate lighting once the lid is closed. So just any of the powder won't light off you have to light off the starter powder. Cecil Sent using recycled electrons. On Mar 16, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Mike Greenway k...@bellsouth.net wrote: I some have old style Cadwell that require lighting off with a torch. I have had them for many years and apparently the chemical mixture has gotten too old to fire off as I tried one today and just no reaction. Has anyone run
Topband: CADWELL
For all that responded thanks for the input. I took another canister of the igniter/powder and this time looked closely at the bottom of the pile that was dumped. There appear to be a few granules that are at the bottom that are a little larger ie 1/8 inch maybe that must be the igniter. I don’t recall seeing this on the first canister. This time I used a flint lighter that was used in the old school days of lighting a propane torch. It took off like a scalded dog and I see why they have gone to an electric igniters on the newer models. You could get seriously burned if you are not cautious. Now I just need a canister of the material to replaced the one that more of less went to waste. That is probably something I will never find but who knows. Anyway first ground rod done. 73 Mike K4PI _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: CADWELLS
I some have old style Cadwell that require lighting off with a torch. I have had them for many years and apparently the chemical mixture has gotten too old to fire off as I tried one today and just no reaction. Has anyone run into this before? Don’t guess there anything easily mixed up to replace the thermo compound. 73 Mike K4PI _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Grounds
I am building a new two wire beverage and have built many in the past that seemed to work okay but I am paying close attention to detail on this one. I have a couple of questions to start. Most all agree that the antenna xfmr ground and and the coax ground should be separate. How much distance between the two ground point is recommended for this? Also is there a problem using the same ground for both coax feeds? ON4UN recommends a common mode choke about 15 feet away from the feed point but at present I am not installing those yet. 73 Mike K4PI _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Radial Question
My 160 vertical is right up against the house so I have used “under the house” radials for years. The basement is not finished out so I just tacked them to the floor joist with a staple gun and brought them back to a central point at a window just adjacent to the tower and drilled a hole through the window frame large enough to handle some larger wire which connected to the ground radial system. As time went on I put aluminum screen wire along the joist and connected that into the radial system. I have had this system in place over 25 years. 73 Mike K4PI _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Digial mode spurious issues
I don’t am still puzzled why the digital modes decided to use the 1837 to 1839 area with the size of the 160 M band. I know the SSB guys use a lot of the 1840-1900 area but 1900 to 2000 is usable isn’t it? I rarely hear much up there and 3 or 4 khz up there would never be missed. Probably not an answer but it has seemed strange to me since they started operating in that area. Some of their signals are bone crushing and wide. 73 Mike K4PI From: topband-requ...@contesting.com Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 12:00 PM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Topband Digest, Vol 132, Issue 30 Send Topband mailing list submissions to topband@contesting.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to topband-requ...@contesting.com You can reach the person managing the list at topband-ow...@contesting.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Topband digest... Today's Topics: 1. Digital mode spurious issues (Tom W8JI) 2. Re: Digital mode spurious issues (Mike Waters) 3. Re: Digital mode spurious issues (Jim Brown) 4. Re: Digital mode spurious issues (Richard (Rick) Karlquist) 5. Re: Digital mode spurious issues (Joe Subich, W4TV) 6. Re: Digital mode spurious issues (Charlie Cunningham) 7. Re: Digital mode spurious issues (Jim Brown) 8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Stew Perry Streaming Audio (Herb Schoenbohm) 9. Re: Digital mode spurious issues (Grant Saviers) 10. Re: Digital mode spurious issues (W2RU - Bud Hippisley) 11. Re: Digital mode spurious issues (Mike Waters) 12. Re: Digital mode spurious issues (Charlie Cunningham) 13. Re: Digital mode spurious issues (JC N4IS) 14. Re: Digital mode spurious issues (Mike Waters) 15. Re: Digital mode spurious issues (Tom W8JI) 16. Re: Digital mode spurious issues (Charlie Cunningham) 17. Re: Digital mode spurious issues (Steven Raas) 18. Re: Digital mode spurious issues (Mike Waters) 19. Re: Stew Perry Streaming Audio (Shoppa, Tim) 20. CA/OR/AZ activity during Stew Perry - anecdotal data (Barry N1EU) 21. Re: Digital mode spurious issues (Tom W8JI) -- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 12:11:49 -0500 From: Tom W8JI w...@w8ji.com To: Topband topband@contesting.com Subject: Topband: Digital mode spurious issues Message-ID: AB0B5258E3B345428ADE0FAFD65179C0@MAIN Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=response I have not been on the air for a year or so, but decided to get back on. I was listening to a DX station around 1833 when a digimode station up roughly around 1837 came on with a LSB spurious signal on 1833. His signal was a series of slowly changing stepped tones. I don't know what mode that was. His unwanted sideband suppression was about 40 dB, but that was not nearly enough. He was 15 dB out of noise with his unwanted sideband. Does anyone know of a universal software to decode signals? Since the FCC does not require a CW ID, I think that is the only way to identify stations. I assume: 1.) Operators are unlikely to accept they have a problem if they are getting good reports on the intentional signal 2.) Some rigs just should not be used for digimodes (this was a sideband suppression issue) 3.) Those who unwisely placed digimode subbands next to popular weak signal areas, especially when sideband selection produces a supurious that falls in weak signal areas, are unlikely to rethink the poor placement or poor advice on selecting sidebands 4.) With a little work to convince them, most digital ops with radio problems would avoid operating 73 Tom -- Message: 2 Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 12:30:34 -0600 From: Mike Waters mikew...@gmail.com To: Tom W8JI w...@w8ji.com Cc: Topband topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: Digital mode spurious issues Message-ID: ca+fxyxj7jeqkdttr1bwswzu-zjsc0h79yn8hhjdfjks+xlz...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Tom, I believe the mode that operates at 1873-1838 is JT65, and WSJT is needed to decode it. I never tried it. It was developed by K1JT for weak-signal and EME work. http://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjt.html A common scenario with digital modes is that the audio into the mic input is too high, causing unwanted spurs. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Tom W8JI w...@w8ji.com wrote: ... a digimode station up roughly around 1837 came on with a LSB spurious signal on 1833. His signal was a series of slowly changing stepped tones. I don't know what mode that was. His unwanted sideband suppression was about 40 dB, but that was not nearly enough. He was 15 dB out of noise with his unwanted sideband. Does anyone know of a universal software to decode signals? Since the FCC does not
Topband: PHASING SHUNT FED TOWERS
I did try it with two shunt fed towers on 160 meters 1/4 apart using a Wilkinson power divider and had little success and then read in ON4UN’s Lowband book that phasing shunt fed tower was very difficult if possible at all. You might take a look at his book and see if those comments are still there. 73 Mike K4PI All good topband ops know how to put up a beverage at night. _ Topband Reflector
Topband: RG6 BEV
Thanks for all the input, the one thing I did not see staring me in the face was the fact that RG6 is used instead of wire. That answers all my questions as I thought there was just a single wire there and could not figure out how that was possible. 73 Mike K4PI All good topband ops know how to put up a beverage at night. _ Topband Reflector
Topband: ALUMANIZED STEEL
I know some use steel wire on there beverages but I see that Tractor Supply offers steel coated with aluminum. Anyone used this before for very long beverages? 73 Mike K4PI _ Topband Reflector
Topband: ALUMINUM
From some feedback on the aluminum coated steel, I am thinking about trying some regular aluminum, 14 gauge. Anyone got a downside to this? Price, weight, conductivity are good and little if any stretch. I will use aluminum screws and nuts on the end terminations with No Ox. 73 Mike K4PI _ Topband Reflector
Topband: Z81Z
I see that K4ZW is in Z81 for a week or so. He mentions doing low band but wondered if anyone had more info as to whether he might have an amp with him for 160 and freq he might be using. Would really love to work this one on 160. I know he is a good low band op. I sent him an email but not sure if he is picking up his email while he is there. 73 Mike K4PI _ Topband Reflector
Topband: TOPBAND DINNER
I saw GU4YOX mention the Dayton Topband dinner and was wondering if there might be an announcement coming out soon for ticket sales. 73 Mike K4PI _ Topband Reflector
Topband: HS0ZEE SUMMARY
HI Bob, basically most agree he cannot hear due to local noise etc. I knew he was spending a lot of time on 160 and thought maybe someone on the east coast might have worked him. 73 Mike K4PI -Original Message- From: Bob Garrett Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 4:59 AM To: 'Mike Greenway' Subject: RE: Topband: THANKS Mike, Do share a summary with the group please. I'd bet more than 99% of us still need HS. 73, Bob K3UL _ Topband Reflector
Topband: HS0ZEE
Anyone on the East coast had any luck working HS0ZEE on Top? I have listened to him often on 30 M and he seems to have some trouble hearing and wondered if his RX was any better on Top. Any details appreciated if a QSO was made. 73 Mike K4PI _ Topband Reflector
Topband: THANKS
Thanks to all for the great input on HS0.. 73 _ Topband Reflector
Re: Topband: Power Line Noise Detecting
If I didn’t say it, what it tried to say was if I hear the arc 100% this pole has a problem. The antenna on the Ultrasonic has a very very narrow pickup range and you have to move very slowly over every piece on the pole. If I don't hear the arc there could still be a problem on the pole although I have not run into this case yet. Radar Engineers makes an expensive model for the power companies http://radarengineers.com/rfitvi.htm#spark Agreed on the radio to get to the area. I use a Radio Shack Aircraft band with a 3 ele yagi. 73 Mike -Original Message- From: Tom W8JI Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 7:10 AM To: THOMAS M GREENWAY ; topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: Power Line Noise Detecting Good job up to the last step. After getting where I think I have the pole with the VHF TRF receiver I use a Ultrasonic detector that was shown in QST by W1TRC. It will enable you to 100 % verify the problem is on the pole you suspect. That isn't actually 100% verification, or even near 100%. Most RFI generating arcs make broadband acoustical noise, but not all of them. No single method is ever 100%. I would guess ultrasonic is around 80% or so, and it still takes a radio to get to the pole. ___ Stew Perry Topband Distance Challenge coming on December 29th.
Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 119, Issue 24
Keep me posted as I need that on 80 and 160 but would be happy for just 80 Will be in the CQ WW this weekend. Got a HI Z 8 vert array going at the farm.. Sound pretty good.. -Original Message- From: topband-requ...@contesting.com Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 12:00 PM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Topband Digest, Vol 119, Issue 24 Send Topband mailing list submissions to topband@contesting.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to topband-requ...@contesting.com You can reach the person managing the list at topband-ow...@contesting.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Topband digest... Today's Topics: 1. Where to ground the Beverage feedline? (Martin) 2. Re: Converting a full-size G5RV to a T for 160m (Michael G. Carper) 3. Re: Where to ground the Beverage feedline? (Jim Brown) 4. Re: Where to ground the Beverage feedline? (Tom W8JI) 5. XW2CW (George) 6. Re: XW2CW (George) 7. Re: Toroidal common mode choke (ZR) 8. KD9SV Dual Band Pre-Amp and F.E.S. (Rick Arzadon) 9. Re: Where to ground the Beverage feedline? (Jim Brown) 10. Looking to improve TX antenna Efficiency (Steven Raas) 11. Re: Where to ground the Beverage feedline? (Jim Brown) 12. Re: Where to ground the Beverage feedline? (Thomas Herrmann) 13. Re: Where to ground the Beverage feedline? (Martin) 14. Re: Toroidal common mode choke (Tom W8JI) 15. antenna wire (Jorge Diez - CX6VM) 16. Re: Where to ground the Beverage feedline? (Tom W8JI) 17. Re: antenna wire (Shoppa, Tim) 18. Re: Toroidal common mode choke (donov...@starpower.net) 19. 2011 ARRL 160 Meter Contest Certificates (Kutzko, Sean, KX9X) 20. Re: Where to ground the Beverage feedline? (Herb Schoenbohm) -- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:33:19 +0100 From: Martin dm...@t-online.de To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Topband: Where to ground the Beverage feedline? Message-ID: 50aa6d5f.7060...@t-online.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Topbanders, please comment on this : The feedline of a beverage is buried all the way from the feedpoint to the shack. There it goes up vertically about 5meters, enters the shack side by side with other feedlines and is- after about another 5meters - connected to the radio . The cable is fitted with a common mode choke near the radio. Where should i ground the feedline? Is it a good idea to ground it where it comes off of the soil? Should it ( additionally) be grounded at the radio? Should i install another common mode choke at the feedpoint? All comments welcome. -- Ohne CW ist es nur CB.. 73, Martin DM4iM -- Message: 2 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:17:12 -0500 From: Michael G. Carper m...@wa9pie.net To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: Converting a full-size G5RV to a T for 160m Message-ID: 006501cdc68a$7b7d05f0$727711d0$@wa9pie.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Thanks for all the replies. I've also found this article by AD1B in CQ from 1995 to be helpful. http://techdoc.kvindesland.no/radio/antennas/20061010171110285.pdf Thus far, the (102') G5RV is up at about 50' and I'm not using it in a T configuration. It's loading up on 160m like a regular G5RV. I know that's not optimal, BUT... I only need 30 more countries on 160m for DXCC and we'll be moving by March. So I'm not going to get all fancy with another inverted-L... or putting down a full ground field. I'll do the best I can to work 30 more with the G5RV or by following the attached article. Mike, WA9PIE -Original Message- From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Michael G. Carper Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 7:09 PM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Topband: Converting a full-size G5RV to a T for 160m Hey guys. I saw a few items in a Google search where guys had converted their full-size G5RV into a T antenna on 160m. It had something to do with adding the obligatory counterpoise and shorting the feedline. This would turn the antenna from a horizontal radiator to a vertical radiator. Anyone have any info on this? Or can you refer me to a source? Mike, WA9PIE ___ Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com -- Message: 3 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:45:52 -0800 From: Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: Where to ground the Beverage feedline? Message-ID: 50aa8c70.7010...@audiosystemsgroup.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 11/19/2012 9:33 AM, Martin wrote: Should i install another common mode choke at the feedpoint? Absolutely! And bond the shield to ground on both sides of the
Topband: CABLE CHOICE
I am going to need to run a coaxial cable from a receiving system about 900 ft away from the shack. My first thought was flooded RG6, Commscope F660BEF, which would appear to have about 4 db of loss but then thought possibly some flooded RG11, MaxPipe S1D60PN-O-R1K, might be a little better. I could not find any loss specs on it. More money of course. Any input on this one? 73 Mike K4PI ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Topband: METAL DETECTOR
Has anyone had good success finding radials with a metal detector? They are advertised as being able to find copper and aluminum. W8JI described his method on of using a MFJ antenna analyzer connected through a transformer to the radial system and then using a small receiver with a loop to track the signal. That should work but I was interested in trying the metal detector idea if anyone has had any success. 73 Mike K4PI ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Topband: TT8TT
If you still need TT on Topband, as I do, please go to http://www.i2ysb.com/joomla5/ and vote in their band needed survey to show you need them on 160. Often the AF expeditions will shy away from Topband stating “too much QRN” but hopefully this one will hang in there. 73 Mike K4PI ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: Beverage Antenna;
Guy, yes I am using WD1A on a 800 ft reversible around 12 high that has helped me work some tough ones in both directions E-W. I am using KD9SVs matching units. I have nothing to compare it with right now. 73 Mike K4PI ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes
Just a note about something in this same vein that I ran into recently with leakage in cables with BNC connectors. I bought some 3 ft jumpers made up with BNC connectors and the connector has no tension when connecting to a BNC jack and once in a while I have to reseat the connector to try and get the connection back. How I noticed it was on a panadapter you could see images start to ingress Also on a antenna connection I was getting some hash from a switching supply in the receiver and reseating the BNC would clear thing up. Amphenol and good quality BNC's have some resistance when rotating the BNC ring and they are tight. The ones if have take very light torque at all to rotate and hence they are not always making a solid connection. They have no band marking so my guess is they are out of BY. There is one major manufacturer using these right now but are soon to replace them. 73 Mike K4PI ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Topband: Progress with ugly computer noise
Be careful with UPS units as I have seen them cause more problems noise wise that computers. A friend of mine had a really bad one he had to unplug to operate on any band. Everything was clean once he got rid of that thing.. 73 Mike K4PI ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: Home Depot LED bulb interference.
I wondered how long it would take before they started selling some RFI generating lighting. Soon we can have a complete neighborhood of RFI from just lights. I am sticking with incandescent. I have enough stock to last the rest of my lifetime.HI. Some years my employer opted to go with some new high efficiency fluorescent lighting and it blanked every AM radio in the 5 story building. 73 Mike K4PI -Original Message- From: Jim F. Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 11:21 AM To: top Band Subject: Topband: Home Depot LED bulb interference. I bought two LED 40 watt equivalent 110V. light bulbs from Home Depot that use only 9 watts of power, for $9.99 ea. They seemed like a good deal but cause noise interference on 160m and the FM radio band. (I did not try other bands.) I like the bulbs but best use them away from your radio station and have someone turn them off and on while monitoring your favorite frequencies/bands. 73, jim / W1FMR ___ ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Topband: Need advice for K3 and RX BC AM
I use my K3 on the AM 550 - 1700 MW broadcast by just turning the width to 5 KHhz and selecting the AM mode . I do turn the PREAMP and receive most station fairly well but if you are serious about the MW area outside the ham bands you will probably need the General Coverage module installed. Of course you do need a good antenna, beverage, LW etc the low bands either way. The K3 is basically a ham bands only radio as it comes. 73 Mike K4PI -Original Message- From: Bill Cromwell Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 10:28 AM To: Topband Reflector Subject: Re: Topband: Need advice for K3 and RX BC AM On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 16:09 +0700, Jo, YC0LOW wrote: My Elecraft K3 has no AM filters installed. I tried to RX AM broadcast stations on MW band but had no success. I'd be grateful if you could advice me to add it on, or, is there a way to do it as is, now pse? I need it as features to check the 160m RX antenna directions in the coming YB8Y DXpedition (OC-221, GL PI64mh) starts in March 20th. 2012 . Tnx es 73 de Jo, YC0LOW ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK Hi Jo, I am not familiar at all with the K(n) radios. Rick has suggested that your radio is not going to hear very much below the 160 meter band due to filtering. But - the way to copy AM with an SSB only receiver is to tune only one sideband. On AM we usually tune with the carrier in the center of our AM passband with both sidebands and no BFO. In SSB mode tune in the station so it's carrier is zero beat with your BFO. One sideband will then fall into your filter's passband and will be demodulated for you. It should also activate your S-meter. Without the board that Rick has describe this may not work for you at all. SWL operators use the BFO to help with reception of distant SW broadcast stations on AM. 73, Bill KU8H ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: Noise problem question
The W1TRC unti is very, very sharp with the parabolic reflector. The one I saw mentioned earlier as a Bat detector kit does not appear that it would be directive enough but the W1TRC is super effective. The signature is very subtle and you have to be right on the bad component. I have compared it with the commercial Radar Engineer units that the power companies use and it is almost identical in pinpointing the defective part on the pole. Not that we have to do that but when you hear the arc signature on the pole you know you have the right one. I have had occasions when it would appear a pole was bad but no arc signature and it would turn out to be another pole adjacent. It is possible for the arc to be covered or on top when the unit cannot detect it but it has worked 100% for me. They power company uses a Ultrasonic unit that is on a pole where they can sniff around once on top of the pole. 73 Mike K4PI -Original Message- From: W2PM Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 8:37 AM To: mikefur...@att.net Cc: topband@contesting.com ; k...@k3lr.com ; Chet ; Lee Ward Subject: Re: Topband: Noise problem question I'm not sure this would be useful as it seems not to be very directionally sharp. The ultrasonic device would be the last step in positively identifying the source of the arcing so it necessarily means it has to be extremely sharp. Less than 3 degree sense zone. You can get reasonable sharpness at 400 MHz AM with a 5 or 6 element handheld Yagi by the way but not sharp enough to point to actual source component up one the tower or pole. On high tension towers there are banks of insulators so the gapping noise is likely from one of those, not the whole bank. This is why you have to narrow it down. IF you're lucky and have an honest and competent power company they'll do it and just pointing them to a specific pole or tower is fine. They'd appreciate it (but make sure you get them all before calling them in!) A final note, based on my extensive working with ARRL on this topic it is clear the industry and FCC doesn't look at solving these things in weeks. Months minimally and often more than a year. FCC moves very very slowly and the office which handles this has been reassigned at time to other projects taking them off all amateur enforcement for months at a clip. That will only get worse with diminishing budgets. I Sent from my iPad On Dec 22, 2011, at 7:53, mikefur...@att.net wrote: I have one of these units ... http://pw1.netcom.com/~t-rex/ ... A nifty device. I purchased the complete unit as a kit about 7 years ago for around $40 plus shipping. I have never seen him advertise the kit, I found out about that after I contacted him. The gentleman that produces this kit is also a ham, a KC7 in Nevada. I added a $14 radio shack speaker/amplifier for all to hear. I have not used it to find noise, when the rain stops I'll see how it does. I does have about a 150' to 200' detection range on the local bats depending as per my gain setting. 73, Mike WA5POK -Original Message- From: Tim Duffy K3LR Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 8:38 PM To: 'Chet' ; 'Lee Ward' ; topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: Noise problem question Hi Chet: Just add a l to the end http://www.midnightscience.com/ultrasonics.html I own one of these units - it is great for finding power pole problems. 73, Tim K3LR -Original Message- From: topband-boun...@contesting.com [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Chet Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 8:01 PM To: 'Lee Ward'; topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: Noise problem question The link noted below does not work for me. I am using I E 8. I tried it 3 times. Please post a better one if you have one 73 Chet N4FX -Original Message- From: topband-boun...@contesting.com [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Lee Ward Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 8:27 PM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: Noise problem question Phil, W0XI, has put a kit ultrasonic detector on the market. Well worth looking into. http://www.midnightscience.com/ultrasonics.htm 73, Lee, K0LW -Original Message- From: topband-boun...@contesting.com [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of W2PM Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 4:04 PM To: John G3PQA Cc: David Raymond; topband@contesting.com; Jon Zaimes AA1K; W5UN Subject: Re: Topband: Noise problem question I have used one which the ARRL RF lab brought down here to address a very serious problem. We were able to identify the BOLT on the insulators where arcing was coming from, photograph it, attach both the audio file and the spectral display unique to each offender and the power company still reneged. Until FCC saw this and that was the end of the power company resistance. Problem fixed. Those devices are not easy to aim however.
Topband: Topband Noise noise question
There have been two well written construction articles by W1TRC in QST...Jim Hanson, W1TRC, author of A Home-made Ultrasonic Arc Detector QST Apr 2006 and “Adapting a Three Element Tape Measure Beam For Power LIne Noise Hunting” QST May 2007. FAR circuits sells the board for the Ultrasonic detector. Once you hear the arc on the detector there is no denying there is a problem with the pole. Using the VHF unit to get to the pole and then using the Ultrasonic is a killer combination. I have found dozens and dozens of bad poles in the last few years but unfortunately they just keep coming. If you are plagued by power line noise having the combination of units is a must to help pinpoint the bad pole and the Ultrasonic detector will show you which item on the pole is the culprit. Dry weather is needed for successful tracking of arcs on power poles. 73 Mike K4PI ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Topband: MORE T8 INFO T8CW
Hi Mike, Now in palau rolling blackouts, the power failure time of hotel area is 11:00 to 15:00. I can not QRV in a good time zone, but I do QRV at the time before and behind that. I stay palau between Dec. 22 and Jan 9. Though regrettable, a power failure continues all the time among the length of stay. However, I expect to still go well. Thank you 73 Ryosei Aimiya T8CW/JH0IXE ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: EK0HBN QSL Information
It looks like a busted call for IK0HBN who is active on 160..73 -Original Message- From: Herb Schoenbohm Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 10:54 AM To: TopBand List Subject: Topband: EK0HBN QSL Information Please does any member of this list have any information on the QSL route for EK0HBN? QRZ.com comes up em,pty and LOTW deson't have any uploads. *Call sign* *Worked* *Date/Time* *Band* *Mode* *Freq* *QSL* Details https://p1k.arrl.org/lotwuser/qsodetail?qso=314590912 KV4FZ EK0HBN 2010-12-18 23:56:18 160M CW 1.82603 Details https://p1k.arrl.org/lotwuser/qsodetail?qso=359374097 KV4FZ EK0HBN 2010-12-18 23:56:00 160M CW 1.826 Please send me anything you might have on this new one for me. Thanks, Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Topband: T8CC
Anyone on the east coast USA hearing T8CC on Topband? ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Topband: WD1A
I wonder if anyone knows how to reach W5UN? He made a post concerning his problems with WD1A breaking inside the insulation and was wanting to find out if he thought it was a corrosion or tension problem. I tried the email he used to make the post several times but no response. Has anyone else had problems with WD1A breaking? I plan to try a 2 wire bev using the WD1A but if is troublesome I may opt for something else. 73 Mike K4PI ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK