Re: [tor-relays] MyFamily

[Matthias Fetzer]

Hi,

On 5/13/23 18:55, denny.obre...@a-n-o-n-y-m-e.net wrote:

What do you do when you have 50 relays and want to add or remove a relay? You 
must modify 50 torrc files and restart all 50 relays? That seems tedious and 
unnecessary. I'm trying to find a way to automate this process and I can wrap 
my head around the complexity of the problem, especially with multiple servers.


I maintain my MyFamily completely automated using puppet. So once I add 
new relays to my infrastructure, all the torrc files automatically get 
updated and the relays reload (or restart?).


If you really do run >5 relays, I'd highly suggest to use whatever 
automation (puppet, ansible, salt, chef,...) that suits you. But don't 
even try to manually maintain that amount of relays by hand.


As a bonus you can have a unified setup of unattended upgrades and such 
things too.


Best regards, Matthias


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Running Tor exit nodes on university networks

[Matthias Fetzer]

Hi Andreas,

There is a mailing list for tor & universities: 
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays-universities/ its not 
very high traffic and the archives do not hold many e-mails.


It's maybe worth to ask there too and to read through the archives.

I'd also suggest to check for EDU relays on relay search and contact 
some of the bigger EDU relays directly. It would probably be good to 
have some catalog of questions ready.


Edu AS that I remember to run tor exit relays:

- AS3 (MIT, US)
- AS680 (DFN, DE)
- AS12093 (UWaterloo, CA)
- AS36850 (UNC, US)

There are probably dozens more. So I'd suggest to browse through relay 
search yourself :-)


Best regards,
Matthias

On 07.06.21 19:00, Andreas Kempe wrote:

Hello everyone,

I'm a member of Lysator ACS at Linköping university, Sweden. I'm
currently investigating the possibility for our computer society to
run Tor exit nodes. The IT department has made it clear that they will
need some convincing that this is a good idea. One thing that they are
wondering is whether there are other universites with experience
running Tor nodes.

If anyone is currently running Tor nodes on university networks, I'd
love to hear about your experiences. A few questions that turned up
are listed below.

- Have you seen any good or bad press because of the node?
- Are you receiving a lot of abuse complaints?
- How are you handling abuse complaints?
- How are you protecting the rest of your infrastructure from possibly
   malicious traffic?
- Do you have any killer arguments as to why supporting Tor is a good
   idea that helped sway the people in charge at your university?

Thank you in advance for any feedback!
Cordially,
Andreas Kempe


___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Blutmagie retired

[Matthias Fetzer]

Hallo Olaf,

hat dir schon jemand für Blutmagie kostenloses hosting anzubieten?
Ich habe genug freie Resourcen, wenn du von mir eine VM dafür haben
möchtest. Die SSL-Zertifikate könnte man doch wunderbar per Let's 
Encrypt

machen, oder nicht?

Viele Grüße,
Matthias

On 2018-11-11 12:51, Olaf Selke wrote:

Am 09.11.2018 um 23:14 schrieb DrNotThatEvil:
That service was a godsend thanks Olaf, Thanks for all work, love and 
care!


thanx for all the flowers :-)

I took the ssl certificate expiration 11/06 as an occasion to
discontinue the service. Actually behind the scenes everything is
still running. The mysql db is fed with Tor live data. Only the Apache
config prevents access. I'm just too lazy to renew the ssl certificate
or to switch to letsencrypt and I declined offers sell the site.

regards Olaf
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] New exit node

[Matthias Fetzer]

Hi,

OVH also has some traffic limits, that get cut down to 10 Mbps
(depending on the plan). So you could probably have a fast relay until
the limit is reached and then keep doing 10 Mbps.

If the goal is to have better geographic diversity, I think a slower (or
a bursting) relay might still be a good choice. Having relays do
hundrets of Mbps is nice - but not the only way to have a useful relay.

Best regards,
Matthias

On 09/16/2018 08:18 PM, niftybunny wrote:
> DigitalOcean and Vultr have traffic limits. 1 TB sounds great, but is nothing 
> over a month. Not sure about OVH.
> 
> I tried to run relays in Japan and Singapore some years ago. It was bad, you 
> are more than 1 km away from the rest of the crowd so expect delay and 
> jitter :(
> 
>> On 16. Sep 2018, at 19:16, Matthias Fetzer  wrote:
>>
>> Hello Olaf,
>>
>> OVH, DigitalOcean and Vultr have servers in Singapore.
>> While this would probably add to geographic diversity,
>> I am unsure if it's a good idea to run more relays
>> in those AS.
>>
>> On the other hand, I run several OVH-Relays at different
>> geographi locations.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Matthias
>>
>> On 09/16/2018 05:18 PM, Olaf Grimm wrote:
>>> Roman, ignore this people.
>>>
>>> Do you have an intention for a relay in APAC? I looking for a provider
>>> in Asia with unlimited bandwith / traffic. I've found nothing,
>>> Or other recommendations? Maximum of 15$ is desired.
>>> Or South America. or Africa. Outside of Tor-overloaded areas.
>>> Want to reach my goal of 10 relays...
>>>
>>> Olaf
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 16.09.2018 um 17:03 schrieb Roman Mamedov:
>>>> On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 13:40:50 +
>>>> livak  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> it would be nice to find financial help to make the tor network grow 
>>>>> faster.
>>>> You need to put things in perspective, and then consider how your request
>>>> looks to an outside observer. What you have is a relay:
>>>>
>>>>  - at OVH, which is oversaturated with relays by any measure;
>>>>
>>>>  - only 10 Mbit (seems hard-capped), even though you get unmetered 100 Mbit
>>>>on your server;
>>>>
>>>>  - IPv4-only, while OVH does provide IPv6;
>>>>
>>>> To summarize, this is the worst location to start a new relay (some would 
>>>> say
>>>> adding more relays at OVH does more harm than good), the bandwidth is 
>>>> capped
>>>> ridiculously low, and you didn't even put much thought into setting it up.
>>>>
>>>> It seems that you think you found a way to set up a tiny relay on the side,
>>>> exploit gullible people to pay you for it, and enjoy not only a paid-off
>>>> server (after all the fee is as low as 4 EUR per month[1]) which you can 
>>>> use
>>>> for your own purposes (with only 10% of the bandwidth given to Tor), but 
>>>> also
>>>> some free money on top.
>>>>
>>>> Considering that many of us pay for multiple relays out of our own pocket 
>>>> --
>>>> actual fast ones with hundreds megabits at non-trivial locations -- and 
>>>> don't
>>>> run the first thing to the mailing list begging for money, your behavior is
>>>> nothing but disgusting.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://www.kimsufi.com/fr/serveurs.xml
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> tor-relays mailing list
>>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] New exit node

[Matthias Fetzer]

Hello Olaf,

OVH, DigitalOcean and Vultr have servers in Singapore.
While this would probably add to geographic diversity,
I am unsure if it's a good idea to run more relays
in those AS.

On the other hand, I run several OVH-Relays at different
geographi locations.

Best regards,
Matthias

On 09/16/2018 05:18 PM, Olaf Grimm wrote:
> Roman, ignore this people.
> 
> Do you have an intention for a relay in APAC? I looking for a provider
> in Asia with unlimited bandwith / traffic. I've found nothing,
> Or other recommendations? Maximum of 15$ is desired.
> Or South America. or Africa. Outside of Tor-overloaded areas.
> Want to reach my goal of 10 relays...
> 
> Olaf
> 
> 
> Am 16.09.2018 um 17:03 schrieb Roman Mamedov:
>> On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 13:40:50 +
>> livak  wrote:
>>
>>> it would be nice to find financial help to make the tor network grow faster.
>> You need to put things in perspective, and then consider how your request
>> looks to an outside observer. What you have is a relay:
>>
>>   - at OVH, which is oversaturated with relays by any measure;
>>
>>   - only 10 Mbit (seems hard-capped), even though you get unmetered 100 Mbit
>> on your server;
>>
>>   - IPv4-only, while OVH does provide IPv6;
>>
>> To summarize, this is the worst location to start a new relay (some would say
>> adding more relays at OVH does more harm than good), the bandwidth is capped
>> ridiculously low, and you didn't even put much thought into setting it up.
>>
>> It seems that you think you found a way to set up a tiny relay on the side,
>> exploit gullible people to pay you for it, and enjoy not only a paid-off
>> server (after all the fee is as low as 4 EUR per month[1]) which you can use
>> for your own purposes (with only 10% of the bandwidth given to Tor), but also
>> some free money on top.
>>
>> Considering that many of us pay for multiple relays out of our own pocket --
>> actual fast ones with hundreds megabits at non-trivial locations -- and don't
>> run the first thing to the mailing list begging for money, your behavior is
>> nothing but disgusting.
>>
>> [1] https://www.kimsufi.com/fr/serveurs.xml
>>
> 
> 
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Become a Fallback Directory Mirror

[Matthias Fetzer]

Hi,

>
> How often does the relay reach its traffic cap?

Every month. Rofltor03 is capped at ~10TB of incoming traffic. I can
probably spare another 5TB, but I don't think this will change things much.

> So it's not a good role for relays that have limited traffic or bandwidth.
> (We'd rather use those relays for user traffic.)
>

Alright. I will then just leave it running, as is. You can use my other
relays as fallbacks tho.

Best regards,
Matthias

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Become a Fallback Directory Mirror

[Matthias Fetzer]

Hi,

you can include the following two relays for sure, as they are
guaranteed to not change their ip / port:

- 1E01B887F7FB61BEFC34FA8D9EA98E4268A8275F (rofltor02)
- 41A3C16269C7B63DB6EB741DBDDB4E1F586B1592 (rofltor03)

Currently rofltor03 has a traffic cap. I can change it to a long
running and bandwidth (instead of traffic) capped relay tho, if that
is wanted.

The following relays can keep their ip / port, if you want to include them:

- 8101421BEFCCF4C271D5483C5AABCAAD245BBB9D (rofltor01)
- F741E5124CB12700DA946B78C9B2DD175D6CD2A1 (rofltor06)
- 15BE17C99FACE24470D40AF782D6A9C692AB36D6 (rofltor07)
- 90A5D1355C4B5840E950EB61E673863A6AE3ACA1 (rofltor09)
- 3CB4193EF4E239FCEDC4DC43468E0B0D6B67ACC3 (rofltor10)

Best regards,
Matthias



On 06/26/2018 06:40 PM, Colin Childs wrote:
> Hello Tor Relay Operators,
> 
> Do you want your relay to be a Tor fallback directory mirror?
> Will it have the same address and port for the next 2 years?
> Just reply to this email with your relay's fingerprint.
> 
> If your relay is on the current list, you don't need to do anything.
> 
> If you're asking:
> 
> Q: What's a fallback directory mirror?
> 
> Fallback directory mirrors help Tor clients connect to the network.
> For more details, see [1].
> 
> Q: Is my relay on the current list?
> 
> Search [2] and [3] for your relay fingerprint or IP address and port:
> 
> [2] is the current list of fallbacks in Tor.
> [3] is used to create the next list of fallbacks.
> 
> Q: What do I need to do if my relay is on the list?
> 
> Keep the same IP address, keys, and ports.
> Email tor-relays if the relay's details change.
> 
> Q: Can my relay be on the list next time?
> 
> We need fast relays that will be on the same IP address and port for 2
> years. Reply to this email to get on the list, or to update the details
> of your relay.
> 
> Once or twice a year, we run a script to choose about 150-200 relays
> from the potential list [3] for the list in Tor [2].
> 
> Q: Why didn't my relay get on the list last time?
> 
> We check a relay's uptime, flags, and speed [4]. Sometimes, a relay might
> be down when we check. That's ok, we will check it again next time.
> 
> It's good to have some new relays on the list every release. That helps
> tor clients, because blocking a changing list is harder.
> 
> Q. I already have a relay in the fallback list, can I add another?
> 
> We will pick up to 7 relays per operator to be in the fallback list.
> Please send 
> any relays that you would like considered for the fallback list.
> 
> Thanks for considering and/or being a fallback directory mirror!
> 
> [1]: 
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/FallbackDirectoryMirrors
> [2]: https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/tree/src/or/fallback_dirs.inc
> [3]: 
> https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/tree/scripts/maint/fallback.whitelist
> [4]: 
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/21564/fallbacks_2017-05-16-0815-09cd78886.log
> 
> 
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] *.old files in ./keys are too new

[Matthias Fetzer]

June vs July.

Cheers,
Matthias

On 07/19/2017 08:47 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> I do wonder, why the *.old files are newer than their counterparts:
> 
> -rw--- 1 tor tor 887 Jul 15 21:51 secret_onion_key
> -rw--- 1 tor tor  96 Jul 15 21:51 secret_onion_key_ntor
> -rw--- 1 tor tor  96 Jun 17 21:30 secret_onion_key_ntor.old
> -rw--- 1 tor tor 887 Jun 17 21:30 secret_onion_key.old
> 
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Changing exit to bridge

[Matthias Fetzer]

Hi,

> I challenge you to keep it as an exit, exits are more helpful and more
> fun to run. Just fight with abuse complaints, it's not that hard and
> it'll make you feel better :) try keeping it as an exit.

I'd suggest to run an exit relay at some datacenter and not at home. It
is not advised (generally) to run exits at home. Maybe turn your home
line into some bridge and rent some server somewhere to run an exit relay.

On 03/14/2017 08:40 PM, s7r wrote:
> Volker Mink wrote:
>> Thanks so far.
>> Does it keep my stats in Atlas when i change it from an exit to a bridge?
>> What do i have to change in the torrc-file?
>>
>> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/E20FF09A9A800B16C1C7C16E8C0DF95F46F649B0
>>
> 
> Note that if the IP address was an exit relay or relay it probably ended
> up in few lists (the IP addresses of all relays are public) and it might
> not be a good bridge ... because it will be already blocked and nobody
> would be able to use that bridge.
> 
> If you can get a fresh IP address and run a bridge that would be
> awesome, if not simply keep it as a middle relay.
> 

> 
> 
> 
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] All I want for Chrismas is a bloody t-shirt

[Matthias Fetzer]

And so will I. Thanks for the information!

On 01/10/2017 09:25 PM, Michael Armbruster wrote:
> On 2017-01-10 at 21:24, I wrote:
>> Michael,
>>
>> Jon Selon  seems to be the Shirt Commander
>>
>> He didn't muck around sending mine.
>>
>> Rob
> 
> Thank you, Rob!
> 
> I will contact him :)
> 
> Best,
> Michael
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Second relay on same ESX

[Matthias Fetzer]

Hi Patrick,

I recommend that you just try it. Many people run several instances on
the same hardware (even on same VMs) to saturate their line. You can
just try if running a second relay will consume more bw.

>> - basically, would it have any significant added value to the network?

I can stress what s7r said: If it increases overall bandwidth, it is
definately added value to the network.

Regards,

Matthias

On 12/11/2016 06:18 PM, Patrick DERWAEL wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> I'm running a relay in a VM on a physical server which is largely under used
> Current advertised bandwidth 26MB, consensus 76500
> I'm considering running a second relay (2nd VM) on the very same
> hardware, but this brings a few questions:
> 
> - is there any issue running it at the same geographical place?
> - would the current total BW effectively consumed (26MB) be divided in 2
> (i.e. no added value in BW)?
> - basically, would it have any significant added value to the network?
> 
> Thanks
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] All I want for Chrismas is a bloody t-shirt

[Matthias Fetzer]

On 2016-12-09 11:04, teor wrote:
On 9 Dec. 2016, at 20:45, Dakota Hourie  
wrote:


Also been looking for a T-shirt. I would even be willing to buy it! 
How

do I contact Jon?
-
Dakota Hourie
Outfall Exits Operator


I have CC'd Jon, go easy on him, it's a busy month!

You can't buy a t-shirt, but they are available by donation:
https://donate.torproject.org/



Back when I messaged him, I did not receive any reply at all.
Does he actually send out shirts?

If I got that right, I should be eligible to receive one,
for running my relays: https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/rofltor

Cheers,

Matthias


T

--
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
xmpp: teor at torproject dot org




___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay questions

[Matthias Fetzer]

Hi,

On 11/23/2016 07:16 PM, Sec INT wrote:
> - for server monitoring Im using nagios but it is very difficult to set this 
> up to monitor bandwidth use does anyone know of a tool to do this? (Im using 
> webmin to record bandwidth use but it doesnt have any alerting on it)

I am using Munin to monitor relay bandwidth. Do you want to monitor it,
to just get some information, or is it about bandwidth limits?

You can limit your relays by bandwidth and traffic. See the FAQ about
this: https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#LimitTotalBandwidth

> - on atlas i dont seem to have any bandwidth showing?

Give it some time. Eventually it will show it correctly.

> - what is HSDir and V2dir on atlas flags mean?

See the following page:
https://tor.stackexchange.com/questions/423/what-are-good-explanations-for-relay-flags

But i bet you can easily find the answers on the official pages aswell.

> - ive seen the good/bad isp page but this seems quite old is there anywhere 
> to get more up to date information on good isps?

On non-exit nodes I tend to just try it. About exit nodes, I suggest
that you ask the ISPs before. To contribute to network diversity I
strongly suggest, that you set up some relays at some more exotic
ISPs/Countries.

Soem stats about relay ASNs:

https://metrics.torproject.org/bubbles.html#as

Cheers,

Matthias



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] DigitalOcean pricing (Re: tomhek - the (new) biggest guard relay operator)

[Matthias Fetzer]

Still, $5 is dirt cheap. You probably need to compare more providers.

On 09/13/2016 04:14 PM, Markus Koch wrote:
> Seflow is only 1,99 € ... So compared to $5 DigitalOcean is expensive
>  :)
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On 13 Sep 2016, at 15:01, Tristan  > wrote:
> 
>> Well, if $5 a month is high for you, I don't know what to say.
>>
>>
>> On Sep 13, 2016 4:01 AM, "Admin Kode-IT" > > wrote:
>>
>> __
>> Is there something special about D.O.? The server prices are quite
>> high in my opinion.
>>
>> ___
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>> 
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>> 
>>
>> ___
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org 
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
> 
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] obfs4 - git how to ?

[Matthias Fetzer]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi,

go is a programming language[0]. You can install golang from the
golang repository[1]. There are some tutorials out there on how to get
it running under raspbian - but maybe there are packages in the
repository available.

Once installed, you can use the go command to compile go programs. See
the manual at [2].

Cheers,

Matthias

[0]: https://golang.org/
[1]: https://github.com/golang/go
[2]: https://golang.org/cmd/go/

On 08/15/2016 09:11 PM, Petrusko wrote:
> 
>> Through out any of this, did it occur for you to look at the 
>> `README.md` file in the directory you cloned?
>> 
>> To build: `go get 
>> git.torproject.org/pluggable-transports/obfs4.git/obfs4proxy`
>> 
>> To install: Copy `$GOPATH/bin/obfs4proxy` to a permanent location
>> (Eg: `/usr/local/bin`)
> 
> Thx all for your answers (sry for this answer 1 month after...)
> 
> Rah, I've just understood why I'm having this problem with 
> "permission denied", after copying the folder obfs4proxy cloned 
> from git, in the /usr/bin/obfs4proxy
> 
> Is it source folder I'm downloading from git ?! So _I've to build 
> obfs4proxy_ with "go" and all others dependencies listed ?! So "go"
> is a program used to build ?!
> 
> Ouch, I'm not sure how to find this program in the distribution
> I'm using (Raspbian)
> 
> Sry for being noob!!! totally noob ;) But it's nice to learn 
> everyday... Thx ;)
> 
> 
> 
> ___ tor-relays mailing
>  list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org 
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXshswAAoJEHANOxYzX3CHizIH/i2ef9SZOgF/iZ5QQVDGJ6Vk
HGPboLJQFutgmZexyFzMdxSRGGsxqwgRFpwrPO1iXJz5GsvIdoHDnbx2ewveMeJ2
VeT2kbHw/jk1wPZfKQ4PsxXizU3r0zUFC/wo8Z6cLkpzVTFAbWxui1LbJJ9gK8BD
t9nBc8CPeIHNr9Bjn00WI8MQfovbJS1SHz+RYfWXk+Mw/Y5SVwxK7I8d9Sdv9kh2
r7VXcov6+rm11TDyAd1+OoO6XNZNx4+UhXwgmnlsvfGOw+RilzAwH1roq6JqEV8F
7FnDEvxZkqG7W4ZGzxCZzJYWMtbAsjz/PQRXuMwwFLzXhxr2MPRYcrdQLDyq4HM=
=HBxJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays