[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906420] Re: Please replace default Gnome extension "Desktop Icons" with "Desktop Icons NG (DING)" (by the same author)

2020-12-02 Thread Adam Dingle
I also run Desktop Icons NG, and agree that it is superior to the the
original Desktop Icons extension.  Even if the original version is still
supported, my impression is that the NG version is more actively
maintained and is the focus of the author's development efforts.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906420

Title:
  Please replace default Gnome extension "Desktop Icons" with "Desktop
  Icons NG (DING)" (by the same author)

Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  By default, Ubuntu installs the Gnome extension "Desktop Icons" [1]
  (by rastersoft).

  Unfortunately, this extension is now unmaintained, is problematic, and
  leads to several bugs, including but not limited to Bug #1901150 and
  Bug #1813441.

  The same author has created, and continues to maintain, the far
  superior "Desktop Icons NG (DING)" [2]. It solves a number of problems
  including the two aforementioned bugs.

  It's possible to disable, but not uninstall, "Desktop Icons", and then
  to install "Desktop Icons NG (DING)". I did this a while ago with
  great results.

  If Canonical replaces the former with the latter, not only will Ubuntu
  be using a better desktop manager, but also it will be able clear all
  related bugs at a stroke.

  This is a simple, cheap, quick and effective solution that will let
  the devs concentrate on more important tasks.

  Please give this serious consideration.

  
  More information:

  Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS
  64-bit
  Gnome version 3.36.3

  
  [1] https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/1465/desktop-icons/

  [2] https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/2087/desktop-icons-ng-ding/

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1906420/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1670959] Re: systemd-resolved using 100% CPU

2017-06-12 Thread Adam Dingle
It seems that the problem is that dnsmasq is forwarding DNS queries to
the systemd-resolved stub server, but they are incompatible in some
way:.  From /var/log/syslog:

Jun 12 17:05:34 sparkly dnsmasq[1177]: using nameserver 127.0.0.53#53
Jun 12 17:05:49 sparkly dnsmasq[1177]: Maximum number of concurrent DNS queries 
reached (max: 150)

As a workaround, I edited /etc/dnsmasq.conf and added these lines to
tell it to ignore resolve.conf and hardcoded my ISP's DNS servers
instead:

no-resolv
server=75.75.75.75
server=75.75.76.76

It seems to work: I'm running a hotspot on a USB wifi device and it's
working fine, and there's no sign of the CPU trouble.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1670959

Title:
  systemd-resolved using 100% CPU

Status in dnsmasq package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Sometimes systemd-resolved process is using 100% CPU.
  After a while it changes back to normal.

  It happens usually after connecting to the (wifi) network, like
  starting the OS.

  strace output:

  sendmsg(12, {msg_name(16)={sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(33589), 
sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 
msg_iov(1)=[{"6\215\201\200\0\1\0\1\0\0\0\1\4cs41\3wac\vedgecastcdn\3net\0\0\34\0\1\300\f\0\34\0\1\0\0\10\235\0\20&\6(\0\0024\0Y%L\4\6#f&\214\0\0)\377\326\0\0\0\0\0\0",
 81}], msg_controllen=28, [{cmsg_len=28, cmsg_level=SOL_IP, 
cmsg_type=IP_PKTINFO, {ipi_ifindex=if_nametoindex("lo"), 
ipi_spec_dst=inet_addr("127.0.0.53"), ipi_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.53")}}], 
msg_flags=0}, 0) = 81
  sendmsg(3, {msg_name(0)=NULL, 
msg_iov(4)=[{"PRIORITY=6\nSYSLOG_FACILITY=3\nCODE_FILE=../src/resolve/resolved-dns-stub.c\nCODE_LINE=363\nCODE_FUNCTION=dns_stub_process_query\nSYSLOG_IDENTIFIER=systemd-resolved\n",
 160}, {"MESSAGE=", 8}, {"Processing query...", 19}, {"\n", 1}], 
msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, MSG_NOSIGNAL) = 188
  epoll_wait(4, [{EPOLLIN, {u32=3176459184, u64=94565471415216}}], 16, -1) = 1
  clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME, {44665, 938069872}) = 0
  recvfrom(12, NULL, 0, MSG_PEEK|MSG_TRUNC, NULL, NULL) = 53
  recvmsg(12, {msg_name(16)={sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(33589), 
sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 
msg_iov(1)=[{"Z\262\1\20\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\1\4cs41\3wac\vedgecastcdn\3net\0\0\34\0\1\0\0)\2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0",
 3936}], msg_controllen=56, [{cmsg_len=28, cmsg_level=SOL_IP, 
cmsg_type=IP_PKTINFO, {ipi_ifindex=if_nametoindex("lo"), 
ipi_spec_dst=inet_addr("127.0.0.53"), ipi_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.53")}}, 
{cmsg_len=20, cmsg_level=SOL_IP, cmsg_type=IP_TTL, {ttl=64}}], msg_flags=0}, 0) 
= 53
  stat("/etc/resolv.conf", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=303, ...}) = 0
  getrandom("\365I", 2, GRND_NONBLOCK)= 2
  stat("/etc/resolv.conf", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=303, ...}) = 0
  getrandom("\203;", 2, GRND_NONBLOCK)= 2
  clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME, {44665, 938446937}) = 0
  open("/run/systemd/netif/links/3", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such 
file or directory)
  stat("/etc/resolv.conf", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=303, ...}) = 0
  stat("/etc/resolv.conf", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=303, ...}) = 0
  socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC|SOCK_NONBLOCK, IPPROTO_IP) = 18
  connect(18, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), 
sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 16) = 0
  epoll_ctl(4, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 18, {EPOLLIN, {u32=3176610576, 
u64=94565471566608}}) = 0
  write(18, 
"\203;\1\20\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\1\4cs41\3wac\vedgecastcdn\3net\0\0\34\0\1\0\0)\2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0",
 53) = 53
  clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME, {44665, 938833717}) = 0
  clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME, {44665, 938875138}) = 0
  epoll_ctl(4, EPOLL_CTL_DEL, 18, NULL)   = 0
  close(18)   = 0

  journalctl output:

  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:41 parsec dnsmasq[1545]: Maximum number of concurrent DNS 
queries reached (max: 150)

  As you can see, I would use it together with dnsmasq.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
  Package: systemd 232-18ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-9.11-generic 4.10.0
  Uname: Linux 4.10.0-9-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.4-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Wed Mar  8 08:20:18 2017
  MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_US:en
   TERM=xterm
   

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1670959] Re: systemd-resolved using 100% CPU

2017-06-12 Thread Adam Dingle
I just tried the workaround Kai-Heng mentioned in #9 above: I added
'DNSSEC=off' to /etc/systemd/resolved.conf, then rebooted.
Unfortunately I'm still seeing this CPU problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1670959

Title:
  systemd-resolved using 100% CPU

Status in dnsmasq package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Sometimes systemd-resolved process is using 100% CPU.
  After a while it changes back to normal.

  It happens usually after connecting to the (wifi) network, like
  starting the OS.

  strace output:

  sendmsg(12, {msg_name(16)={sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(33589), 
sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 
msg_iov(1)=[{"6\215\201\200\0\1\0\1\0\0\0\1\4cs41\3wac\vedgecastcdn\3net\0\0\34\0\1\300\f\0\34\0\1\0\0\10\235\0\20&\6(\0\0024\0Y%L\4\6#f&\214\0\0)\377\326\0\0\0\0\0\0",
 81}], msg_controllen=28, [{cmsg_len=28, cmsg_level=SOL_IP, 
cmsg_type=IP_PKTINFO, {ipi_ifindex=if_nametoindex("lo"), 
ipi_spec_dst=inet_addr("127.0.0.53"), ipi_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.53")}}], 
msg_flags=0}, 0) = 81
  sendmsg(3, {msg_name(0)=NULL, 
msg_iov(4)=[{"PRIORITY=6\nSYSLOG_FACILITY=3\nCODE_FILE=../src/resolve/resolved-dns-stub.c\nCODE_LINE=363\nCODE_FUNCTION=dns_stub_process_query\nSYSLOG_IDENTIFIER=systemd-resolved\n",
 160}, {"MESSAGE=", 8}, {"Processing query...", 19}, {"\n", 1}], 
msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, MSG_NOSIGNAL) = 188
  epoll_wait(4, [{EPOLLIN, {u32=3176459184, u64=94565471415216}}], 16, -1) = 1
  clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME, {44665, 938069872}) = 0
  recvfrom(12, NULL, 0, MSG_PEEK|MSG_TRUNC, NULL, NULL) = 53
  recvmsg(12, {msg_name(16)={sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(33589), 
sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 
msg_iov(1)=[{"Z\262\1\20\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\1\4cs41\3wac\vedgecastcdn\3net\0\0\34\0\1\0\0)\2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0",
 3936}], msg_controllen=56, [{cmsg_len=28, cmsg_level=SOL_IP, 
cmsg_type=IP_PKTINFO, {ipi_ifindex=if_nametoindex("lo"), 
ipi_spec_dst=inet_addr("127.0.0.53"), ipi_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.53")}}, 
{cmsg_len=20, cmsg_level=SOL_IP, cmsg_type=IP_TTL, {ttl=64}}], msg_flags=0}, 0) 
= 53
  stat("/etc/resolv.conf", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=303, ...}) = 0
  getrandom("\365I", 2, GRND_NONBLOCK)= 2
  stat("/etc/resolv.conf", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=303, ...}) = 0
  getrandom("\203;", 2, GRND_NONBLOCK)= 2
  clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME, {44665, 938446937}) = 0
  open("/run/systemd/netif/links/3", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such 
file or directory)
  stat("/etc/resolv.conf", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=303, ...}) = 0
  stat("/etc/resolv.conf", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=303, ...}) = 0
  socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC|SOCK_NONBLOCK, IPPROTO_IP) = 18
  connect(18, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), 
sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 16) = 0
  epoll_ctl(4, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 18, {EPOLLIN, {u32=3176610576, 
u64=94565471566608}}) = 0
  write(18, 
"\203;\1\20\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\1\4cs41\3wac\vedgecastcdn\3net\0\0\34\0\1\0\0)\2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0",
 53) = 53
  clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME, {44665, 938833717}) = 0
  clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME, {44665, 938875138}) = 0
  epoll_ctl(4, EPOLL_CTL_DEL, 18, NULL)   = 0
  close(18)   = 0

  journalctl output:

  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:41 parsec dnsmasq[1545]: Maximum number of concurrent DNS 
queries reached (max: 150)

  As you can see, I would use it together with dnsmasq.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
  Package: systemd 232-18ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-9.11-generic 4.10.0
  Uname: Linux 4.10.0-9-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.4-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Wed Mar  8 08:20:18 2017
  MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_US:en
   TERM=xterm
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/zsh
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/@/boot/vmlinuz-4.10.0-9-generic 
root=UUID=a54fe703-35d4-47ac-9c6e-4034421531fb ro rootflags=subvol=@
  SourcePackage: systemd
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to zesty on 2015-05-24 (653 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 03/09/2015
  dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.bios.version: M77 Ver. 01.05
  dmi.board.name: 2271
  dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.board.version: KBC Version 91.4C
  

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1670959] Re: systemd-resolved using 100% CPU

2017-06-12 Thread Adam Dingle
I've also run into this CPU problem on 17.04.  Like tlk, I had to
install dnsmasq because I'm running a hotspot on a USB wifi device, and
the system log indicated that it wouldn't work unless dnsmasq is
installed.

** Also affects: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1670959

Title:
  systemd-resolved using 100% CPU

Status in dnsmasq package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Sometimes systemd-resolved process is using 100% CPU.
  After a while it changes back to normal.

  It happens usually after connecting to the (wifi) network, like
  starting the OS.

  strace output:

  sendmsg(12, {msg_name(16)={sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(33589), 
sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 
msg_iov(1)=[{"6\215\201\200\0\1\0\1\0\0\0\1\4cs41\3wac\vedgecastcdn\3net\0\0\34\0\1\300\f\0\34\0\1\0\0\10\235\0\20&\6(\0\0024\0Y%L\4\6#f&\214\0\0)\377\326\0\0\0\0\0\0",
 81}], msg_controllen=28, [{cmsg_len=28, cmsg_level=SOL_IP, 
cmsg_type=IP_PKTINFO, {ipi_ifindex=if_nametoindex("lo"), 
ipi_spec_dst=inet_addr("127.0.0.53"), ipi_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.53")}}], 
msg_flags=0}, 0) = 81
  sendmsg(3, {msg_name(0)=NULL, 
msg_iov(4)=[{"PRIORITY=6\nSYSLOG_FACILITY=3\nCODE_FILE=../src/resolve/resolved-dns-stub.c\nCODE_LINE=363\nCODE_FUNCTION=dns_stub_process_query\nSYSLOG_IDENTIFIER=systemd-resolved\n",
 160}, {"MESSAGE=", 8}, {"Processing query...", 19}, {"\n", 1}], 
msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, MSG_NOSIGNAL) = 188
  epoll_wait(4, [{EPOLLIN, {u32=3176459184, u64=94565471415216}}], 16, -1) = 1
  clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME, {44665, 938069872}) = 0
  recvfrom(12, NULL, 0, MSG_PEEK|MSG_TRUNC, NULL, NULL) = 53
  recvmsg(12, {msg_name(16)={sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(33589), 
sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 
msg_iov(1)=[{"Z\262\1\20\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\1\4cs41\3wac\vedgecastcdn\3net\0\0\34\0\1\0\0)\2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0",
 3936}], msg_controllen=56, [{cmsg_len=28, cmsg_level=SOL_IP, 
cmsg_type=IP_PKTINFO, {ipi_ifindex=if_nametoindex("lo"), 
ipi_spec_dst=inet_addr("127.0.0.53"), ipi_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.53")}}, 
{cmsg_len=20, cmsg_level=SOL_IP, cmsg_type=IP_TTL, {ttl=64}}], msg_flags=0}, 0) 
= 53
  stat("/etc/resolv.conf", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=303, ...}) = 0
  getrandom("\365I", 2, GRND_NONBLOCK)= 2
  stat("/etc/resolv.conf", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=303, ...}) = 0
  getrandom("\203;", 2, GRND_NONBLOCK)= 2
  clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME, {44665, 938446937}) = 0
  open("/run/systemd/netif/links/3", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such 
file or directory)
  stat("/etc/resolv.conf", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=303, ...}) = 0
  stat("/etc/resolv.conf", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=303, ...}) = 0
  socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC|SOCK_NONBLOCK, IPPROTO_IP) = 18
  connect(18, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), 
sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 16) = 0
  epoll_ctl(4, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 18, {EPOLLIN, {u32=3176610576, 
u64=94565471566608}}) = 0
  write(18, 
"\203;\1\20\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\1\4cs41\3wac\vedgecastcdn\3net\0\0\34\0\1\0\0)\2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0",
 53) = 53
  clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME, {44665, 938833717}) = 0
  clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME, {44665, 938875138}) = 0
  epoll_ctl(4, EPOLL_CTL_DEL, 18, NULL)   = 0
  close(18)   = 0

  journalctl output:

  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:35 parsec systemd-resolved[1512]: Processing query...
  Mar 08 08:25:41 parsec dnsmasq[1545]: Maximum number of concurrent DNS 
queries reached (max: 150)

  As you can see, I would use it together with dnsmasq.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
  Package: systemd 232-18ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-9.11-generic 4.10.0
  Uname: Linux 4.10.0-9-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.4-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Wed Mar  8 08:20:18 2017
  MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_US:en
   TERM=xterm
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/zsh
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/@/boot/vmlinuz-4.10.0-9-generic 
root=UUID=a54fe703-35d4-47ac-9c6e-4034421531fb ro rootflags=subvol=@
  SourcePackage: systemd
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to zesty on 2015-05-24 (653 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 03/09/2015
  dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.bios.version: 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1681513] Re: Ubuntu 17.04: New privacy feature in NetworkManager stops some WiFi adapters from working (mac address randomization)

2017-06-12 Thread Adam Dingle
The solution in comment #1 fixed this for me as well.  I'm running 17.04
and am hosting a hotspot on a  ThinkPenguin Wireless N USB Adapter.  It
didn't work until I applied this workaround.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1681513

Title:
  Ubuntu 17.04: New privacy feature in NetworkManager stops some WiFi
  adapters from working (mac address randomization)

Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  According to 
  
https://blogs.gnome.org/thaller/2016/08/26/mac-address-spoofing-in-networkmanager-1-4-0/
  there is a new privacy feature in the new version of NetworkManager.
  This privacy feature can cause some USB WiFi adapters to stop working
  while they used to work with older versions of NetworkManager (Ubuntu 16.10 
or older).

  The purpose of this privacy feature is to get your computer to report a new 
random MAC address whenever you connect to a WiFi network.
  This privacy feature is especially useful when you connect to public WiFi 
networks, so that the operators cannot identify you when you connect multiple 
times.

  The downside of this privacy feature is that some USB WiFi adapters misbehave 
when NetworkManager tries to change their MAC address repeatedly. 
  The result is that those USB WiFi adapters cannot connect anymore to the WiFi 
 network.

  Original report follows:

  My Panda USB wi-fi adapter works just fine on 16.10, but when I try to
  connect to my wi-fi router in 17.04, GNOME network manager reports
  "Connection failed." I did some tinkering, and noticed that my MAC
  address for my wifi adapter, according to GNOME, is DIFFERENT every
  time I make it forget my wifi settings and try to reconnect. Weird,
  right? Any leads on a possible fix or work-around?

  I'm running the latest beta of Ubuntu GNOME 17.04, kernel
  4.10.0-19-generic, GNOME 3.24.0.

  https://blogs.gnome.org/thaller/2016/08/26/mac-address-spoofing-in-
  networkmanager-1-4-0/

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1681513/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1627769] Re: limits.conf not applied

2017-05-26 Thread Adam Dingle
OK - I was finally able to get this working in 17.04 after more
experimentation, which revealed the following caveats:

- Ubuntu will respect limits you put in /etc/security/limits.conf (or
/etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf), but **only after a reboot**.
Logging out and back in are not sufficient to trigger a change.  I
suspect that rebooting only became necessary after the recent transition
to systemd.

- Limits in /etc/systemd/user.conf are applied after logging out and in.

- I've only been able to change NOFILE (the max number of open files) by
editing /etc/systemd/system.conf and then rebooting (logging out/in is
not enough).  Setting this value in user.conf or limits.conf seems to
have no effect.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627769

Title:
  limits.conf not applied

Status in jackd2 package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in lightdm package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Since upgraded to 16.10 Yakkety, modifications in
  /etc/security/limits.conf are not taken into consideration when
  logging in the graphical interface.

  
  /etc/security/limits.conf:
  @audio   -  rtprio 99
  @audio   -  memlockunlimited

  I tried the same settings in /etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf, to the
  same results.

  
  After logging in Unity, opening a console, the limits are not set:
  blablack@ideaon:~$ ulimit -l -r
  max locked memory   (kbytes, -l) 64
  real-time priority  (-r) 0

  
  Reloging to my user via bash DOES apply the limits:
  blablack@ideaon:~$ ulimit -l -r
  max locked memory   (kbytes, -l) 64
  real-time priority  (-r) 0
  blablack@ideaon:~$ su blablack
  Password: 
  blablack@ideaon:~$ ulimit -l -r
  max locked memory   (kbytes, -l) unlimited
  real-time priority  (-r) 95

  
  Switching to a console (ctrl+alt+f1) and logging in would apply the limits as 
well.



  The exact same setup used to work fine on Xenial 16.04 before upgrade.

  
  If you need any more information, please let me know.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10
  Package: lightdm 1.19.4-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-16.17-generic 4.8.0-rc7
  Uname: Linux 4.8.0-16-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.3-0ubuntu7
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Mon Sep 26 17:27:10 2016
  SourcePackage: lightdm
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jackd2/+bug/1627769/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1627769] Re: limits.conf not applied

2017-05-26 Thread Adam Dingle
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: jackd2 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627769

Title:
  limits.conf not applied

Status in jackd2 package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in lightdm package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Since upgraded to 16.10 Yakkety, modifications in
  /etc/security/limits.conf are not taken into consideration when
  logging in the graphical interface.

  
  /etc/security/limits.conf:
  @audio   -  rtprio 99
  @audio   -  memlockunlimited

  I tried the same settings in /etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf, to the
  same results.

  
  After logging in Unity, opening a console, the limits are not set:
  blablack@ideaon:~$ ulimit -l -r
  max locked memory   (kbytes, -l) 64
  real-time priority  (-r) 0

  
  Reloging to my user via bash DOES apply the limits:
  blablack@ideaon:~$ ulimit -l -r
  max locked memory   (kbytes, -l) 64
  real-time priority  (-r) 0
  blablack@ideaon:~$ su blablack
  Password: 
  blablack@ideaon:~$ ulimit -l -r
  max locked memory   (kbytes, -l) unlimited
  real-time priority  (-r) 95

  
  Switching to a console (ctrl+alt+f1) and logging in would apply the limits as 
well.



  The exact same setup used to work fine on Xenial 16.04 before upgrade.

  
  If you need any more information, please let me know.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10
  Package: lightdm 1.19.4-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-16.17-generic 4.8.0-rc7
  Uname: Linux 4.8.0-16-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.3-0ubuntu7
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Mon Sep 26 17:27:10 2016
  SourcePackage: lightdm
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jackd2/+bug/1627769/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1627769] Re: limits.conf not applied

2017-05-26 Thread Adam Dingle
Artful (17.10) has systemd 233.  I just ran the Artful daily build in
VirtualBox and tried this there.  I see the same problem in Artful:
neither a change to /etc/security/limits.conf nor /etc/systemd/user.conf
affects the limits I see when I run 'prlimit' in a terminal window.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627769

Title:
  limits.conf not applied

Status in jackd2 package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in lightdm package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Since upgraded to 16.10 Yakkety, modifications in
  /etc/security/limits.conf are not taken into consideration when
  logging in the graphical interface.

  
  /etc/security/limits.conf:
  @audio   -  rtprio 99
  @audio   -  memlockunlimited

  I tried the same settings in /etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf, to the
  same results.

  
  After logging in Unity, opening a console, the limits are not set:
  blablack@ideaon:~$ ulimit -l -r
  max locked memory   (kbytes, -l) 64
  real-time priority  (-r) 0

  
  Reloging to my user via bash DOES apply the limits:
  blablack@ideaon:~$ ulimit -l -r
  max locked memory   (kbytes, -l) 64
  real-time priority  (-r) 0
  blablack@ideaon:~$ su blablack
  Password: 
  blablack@ideaon:~$ ulimit -l -r
  max locked memory   (kbytes, -l) unlimited
  real-time priority  (-r) 95

  
  Switching to a console (ctrl+alt+f1) and logging in would apply the limits as 
well.



  The exact same setup used to work fine on Xenial 16.04 before upgrade.

  
  If you need any more information, please let me know.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10
  Package: lightdm 1.19.4-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-16.17-generic 4.8.0-rc7
  Uname: Linux 4.8.0-16-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.3-0ubuntu7
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Mon Sep 26 17:27:10 2016
  SourcePackage: lightdm
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jackd2/+bug/1627769/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1173950] Re: with Ambiance, progress bar is invisible in gitg

2017-05-26 Thread Adam Dingle
This bug is obsolete: the progress bar looks fine in gitg in Zesty.
Marking invalid.

** Changed in: ubuntu-themes
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

** Changed in: ubuntu-themes (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-themes in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173950

Title:
  with Ambiance, progress bar is invisible in gitg

Status in Ubuntu theme:
  Invalid
Status in ubuntu-themes package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  The very latest gitg (in git master) displays a progress bar while
  cloning a repository.  This progress bar is visible in Adwaita but
  invisible in Ambiance.

  See the upstream bug at
  https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699130 .  We may need to
  merge style changes including this one into Ambiance:

  https://git.gnome.org/browse/gitg/tree/gitg/resources/ui/style.css#n89

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-themes/+bug/1173950/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1404702] Re: selected radio button is not visible in WebKit 2.6 in Ambiance

2017-05-26 Thread Adam Dingle
This is no longer an issue with the current WebKitGTK (2.16.2) in Zesty.
I've marked the bug invalid to close it.

** Changed in: ubuntu-themes (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-themes in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404702

Title:
  selected radio button is not visible in WebKit 2.6 in Ambiance

Status in ubuntu-themes package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in webkit2gtk package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  I'm running WebKit 2.6.2 on Ubuntu 15.04 (Vivid).

  With this version of WebKit, a selected radio button looks exactly
  like an unselected radio button in the Ambiance theme.  You can see
  this, for example, if you run Epiphany and visit
  http://www.w3schools.com/HTML/tryit.asp?filename=tryhtml_radio, or any
  other web page with radio buttons.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-themes/+bug/1404702/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693593] [NEW] libgtk-3-0-dbg is missing in Zesty

2017-05-25 Thread Adam Dingle
Public bug reported:

Through Yakkety there was a debug package for libgtk 3, but it's missing
in Zesty:

https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libgtk-3-0-dbg=names=all=all

** Affects: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693593

Title:
  libgtk-3-0-dbg is missing in Zesty

Status in gtk+3.0 package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Through Yakkety there was a debug package for libgtk 3, but it's
  missing in Zesty:

  
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libgtk-3-0-dbg=names=all=all

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/1693593/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1627769] Re: limits.conf not applied

2017-05-25 Thread Adam Dingle
On 17.04, even the workaround that Ewan posted in #5 above doesn't work
for me.  If I add DefaultLimitNOFILE=4 to /etc/systemd/user.conf and
log out and log in again, prlimit still shows this:

adam:~$ prlimit
RESOURCE   DESCRIPTION SOFT  HARD UNITS
...
NOFILE max number of open files4096  4096 files
adam:~$

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627769

Title:
  limits.conf not applied

Status in lightdm package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Since upgraded to 16.10 Yakkety, modifications in
  /etc/security/limits.conf are not taken into consideration when
  logging in the graphical interface.

  
  /etc/security/limits.conf:
  @audio   -  rtprio 99
  @audio   -  memlockunlimited

  I tried the same settings in /etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf, to the
  same results.

  
  After logging in Unity, opening a console, the limits are not set:
  blablack@ideaon:~$ ulimit -l -r
  max locked memory   (kbytes, -l) 64
  real-time priority  (-r) 0

  
  Reloging to my user via bash DOES apply the limits:
  blablack@ideaon:~$ ulimit -l -r
  max locked memory   (kbytes, -l) 64
  real-time priority  (-r) 0
  blablack@ideaon:~$ su blablack
  Password: 
  blablack@ideaon:~$ ulimit -l -r
  max locked memory   (kbytes, -l) unlimited
  real-time priority  (-r) 95

  
  Switching to a console (ctrl+alt+f1) and logging in would apply the limits as 
well.



  The exact same setup used to work fine on Xenial 16.04 before upgrade.

  
  If you need any more information, please let me know.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10
  Package: lightdm 1.19.4-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-16.17-generic 4.8.0-rc7
  Uname: Linux 4.8.0-16-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.3-0ubuntu7
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Mon Sep 26 17:27:10 2016
  SourcePackage: lightdm
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1627769/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1627769] Re: limits.conf not applied

2017-05-25 Thread Adam Dingle
Apparently Fedora has wrestled with this too:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364332

The last comment there
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364332) seems to indicate
that this has been fixed in Fedora 26, which has systemd 233.

I'm running Ubuntu 17.04 Zesty with systemd 232 and am still seeing this
problem.  Perhaps systemd 233 will solve the problem for Ubuntu as well?

** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1364332
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364332

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627769

Title:
  limits.conf not applied

Status in lightdm package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Since upgraded to 16.10 Yakkety, modifications in
  /etc/security/limits.conf are not taken into consideration when
  logging in the graphical interface.

  
  /etc/security/limits.conf:
  @audio   -  rtprio 99
  @audio   -  memlockunlimited

  I tried the same settings in /etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf, to the
  same results.

  
  After logging in Unity, opening a console, the limits are not set:
  blablack@ideaon:~$ ulimit -l -r
  max locked memory   (kbytes, -l) 64
  real-time priority  (-r) 0

  
  Reloging to my user via bash DOES apply the limits:
  blablack@ideaon:~$ ulimit -l -r
  max locked memory   (kbytes, -l) 64
  real-time priority  (-r) 0
  blablack@ideaon:~$ su blablack
  Password: 
  blablack@ideaon:~$ ulimit -l -r
  max locked memory   (kbytes, -l) unlimited
  real-time priority  (-r) 95

  
  Switching to a console (ctrl+alt+f1) and logging in would apply the limits as 
well.



  The exact same setup used to work fine on Xenial 16.04 before upgrade.

  
  If you need any more information, please let me know.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10
  Package: lightdm 1.19.4-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-16.17-generic 4.8.0-rc7
  Uname: Linux 4.8.0-16-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.3-0ubuntu7
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Mon Sep 26 17:27:10 2016
  SourcePackage: lightdm
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1627769/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693024] Re: can't start JACK with real-time scheduling even when in audio group

2017-05-25 Thread Adam Dingle
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1627769 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627769

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1627769
   limits.conf not applied

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to jackd2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693024

Title:
  can't start JACK with real-time scheduling even when in audio group

Status in jackd2 package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I'm running Ubuntu 17.04.  I've installed jack2 and have added myself
  to the 'audio' group as suggested at

    http://jackaudio.org/faq/linux_rt_config.html

  But when I start JACK it reports

  Tue May 23 16:10:24 2017: ERROR: Cannot use real-time scheduling (RR/10)(1: 
Operation not permitted)
  Tue May 23 16:10:24 2017: ERROR: AcquireSelfRealTime error

  I am in the 'audio' group in /etc/group:

  adam:~$ grep audio /etc/group
  audio:x:29:pulse,adam
  adam:~$

  (I restarted the machine after adding myself to this group.)

  'ulimit' isn't showing real-time priority privileges for me:

  adam:~$ ulimit -a | grep real
  real-time priority  (-r) 0
  adam:~$

  The file /etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf looks like this:

  ===

  # Provided by the jackd package.
  #
  # Changes to this file will be preserved.
  #
  # If you want to enable/disable realtime permissions, run
  #
  #dpkg-reconfigure -p high jackd

  @audio   -  rtprio 95
  @audio   -  memlockunlimited
  #@audio   -  nice  -19

  ===

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jackd2/+bug/1693024/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693024] Re: can't start JACK with real-time scheduling even when in audio group

2017-05-23 Thread Adam Dingle
This may also be relevant:

https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/MyServiceCantGetRealtime/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to jackd2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693024

Title:
  can't start JACK with real-time scheduling even when in audio group

Status in jackd2 package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I'm running Ubuntu 17.04.  I've installed jack2 and have added myself
  to the 'audio' group as suggested at

    http://jackaudio.org/faq/linux_rt_config.html

  But when I start JACK it reports

  Tue May 23 16:10:24 2017: ERROR: Cannot use real-time scheduling (RR/10)(1: 
Operation not permitted)
  Tue May 23 16:10:24 2017: ERROR: AcquireSelfRealTime error

  I am in the 'audio' group in /etc/group:

  adam:~$ grep audio /etc/group
  audio:x:29:pulse,adam
  adam:~$

  (I restarted the machine after adding myself to this group.)

  'ulimit' isn't showing real-time priority privileges for me:

  adam:~$ ulimit -a | grep real
  real-time priority  (-r) 0
  adam:~$

  The file /etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf looks like this:

  ===

  # Provided by the jackd package.
  #
  # Changes to this file will be preserved.
  #
  # If you want to enable/disable realtime permissions, run
  #
  #dpkg-reconfigure -p high jackd

  @audio   -  rtprio 95
  @audio   -  memlockunlimited
  #@audio   -  nice  -19

  ===

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jackd2/+bug/1693024/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693024] Re: can't start JACK with real-time scheduling even when in audio group

2017-05-23 Thread Adam Dingle
I believe this problem may have to with Ubuntu's recent transition to
systemd.  Apparently systemd completely ignores /etc/security/limits*.


** Description changed:

  I'm running Ubuntu 17.04.  I've installed jack2 and have added myself to
  the 'audio' group as suggested at
  
-   http://jackaudio.org/faq/linux_rt_config.html
+   http://jackaudio.org/faq/linux_rt_config.html
  
  But when I start JACK it reports
  
  Tue May 23 16:10:24 2017: ERROR: Cannot use real-time scheduling (RR/10)(1: 
Operation not permitted)
  Tue May 23 16:10:24 2017: ERROR: AcquireSelfRealTime error
  
  I am in the 'audio' group in /etc/group:
  
  adam:~$ grep audio /etc/group
  audio:x:29:pulse,adam
  adam:~$
  
  (I restarted the machine after adding myself to this group.)
  
  'ulimit' isn't showing real-time priority privileges for me:
  
  adam:~$ ulimit -a | grep real
  real-time priority  (-r) 0
- adam:~$ 
+ adam:~$
  
- The file /etc/security/limits.d looks like this:
+ The file /etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf looks like this:
  
  ===
  
  # Provided by the jackd package.
  #
  # Changes to this file will be preserved.
  #
  # If you want to enable/disable realtime permissions, run
  #
  #dpkg-reconfigure -p high jackd
  
  @audio   -  rtprio 95
  @audio   -  memlockunlimited
  #@audio   -  nice  -19
  
  ===

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to jackd2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693024

Title:
  can't start JACK with real-time scheduling even when in audio group

Status in jackd2 package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I'm running Ubuntu 17.04.  I've installed jack2 and have added myself
  to the 'audio' group as suggested at

    http://jackaudio.org/faq/linux_rt_config.html

  But when I start JACK it reports

  Tue May 23 16:10:24 2017: ERROR: Cannot use real-time scheduling (RR/10)(1: 
Operation not permitted)
  Tue May 23 16:10:24 2017: ERROR: AcquireSelfRealTime error

  I am in the 'audio' group in /etc/group:

  adam:~$ grep audio /etc/group
  audio:x:29:pulse,adam
  adam:~$

  (I restarted the machine after adding myself to this group.)

  'ulimit' isn't showing real-time priority privileges for me:

  adam:~$ ulimit -a | grep real
  real-time priority  (-r) 0
  adam:~$

  The file /etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf looks like this:

  ===

  # Provided by the jackd package.
  #
  # Changes to this file will be preserved.
  #
  # If you want to enable/disable realtime permissions, run
  #
  #dpkg-reconfigure -p high jackd

  @audio   -  rtprio 95
  @audio   -  memlockunlimited
  #@audio   -  nice  -19

  ===

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jackd2/+bug/1693024/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693024] [NEW] can't start JACK with real-time scheduling even when in audio group

2017-05-23 Thread Adam Dingle
Public bug reported:

I'm running Ubuntu 17.04.  I've installed jack2 and have added myself to
the 'audio' group as suggested at

  http://jackaudio.org/faq/linux_rt_config.html

But when I start JACK it reports

Tue May 23 16:10:24 2017: ERROR: Cannot use real-time scheduling (RR/10)(1: 
Operation not permitted)
Tue May 23 16:10:24 2017: ERROR: AcquireSelfRealTime error

I am in the 'audio' group in /etc/group:

adam:~$ grep audio /etc/group
audio:x:29:pulse,adam
adam:~$

(I restarted the machine after adding myself to this group.)

'ulimit' isn't showing real-time priority privileges for me:

adam:~$ ulimit -a | grep real
real-time priority  (-r) 0
adam:~$ 

The file /etc/security/limits.d looks like this:

===

# Provided by the jackd package.
#
# Changes to this file will be preserved.
#
# If you want to enable/disable realtime permissions, run
#
#dpkg-reconfigure -p high jackd

@audio   -  rtprio 95
@audio   -  memlockunlimited
#@audio   -  nice  -19

===

** Affects: jackd2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Summary changed:

- can't start JACK with real-time schedule even when in audio group
+ can't start JACK with real-time scheduling even when in audio group

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to jackd2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693024

Title:
  can't start JACK with real-time scheduling even when in audio group

Status in jackd2 package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I'm running Ubuntu 17.04.  I've installed jack2 and have added myself
  to the 'audio' group as suggested at

http://jackaudio.org/faq/linux_rt_config.html

  But when I start JACK it reports

  Tue May 23 16:10:24 2017: ERROR: Cannot use real-time scheduling (RR/10)(1: 
Operation not permitted)
  Tue May 23 16:10:24 2017: ERROR: AcquireSelfRealTime error

  I am in the 'audio' group in /etc/group:

  adam:~$ grep audio /etc/group
  audio:x:29:pulse,adam
  adam:~$

  (I restarted the machine after adding myself to this group.)

  'ulimit' isn't showing real-time priority privileges for me:

  adam:~$ ulimit -a | grep real
  real-time priority  (-r) 0
  adam:~$ 

  The file /etc/security/limits.d looks like this:

  ===

  # Provided by the jackd package.
  #
  # Changes to this file will be preserved.
  #
  # If you want to enable/disable realtime permissions, run
  #
  #dpkg-reconfigure -p high jackd

  @audio   -  rtprio 95
  @audio   -  memlockunlimited
  #@audio   -  nice  -19

  ===

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jackd2/+bug/1693024/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668535] Re: Ubuntu17.04-Failed to activate (encrypted) Swap Partition

2017-03-14 Thread Adam Dingle
This looks pretty similar to bug #1670336.  Should one of these be
marked as a duplicate?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668535

Title:
  Ubuntu17.04-Failed to activate (encrypted) Swap Partition

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Zesty:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  ---Problem Description---
  Ubuntu17.04 installation with swap encryption ,Fails to activate Swap 
Partition.

  ---uname output---
  Linux tuleta4u-lp7 4.9.0-11-generic #12-Ubuntu SMP Mon Dec 12 16:16:45 UTC 
2016 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  ---boot type---
  VDVD installtion 

  ---Steps to reproduce--
  1.Install creating a prep boot, swap and root partition.
  2.Encrypt swap partition.
  3.Installation completes, and after reboot can see the failed messages for 
activating swap partition.

  --Error--
  While booting,

  [  OK  ] Started AppArmor initialization.
  [FAILED] Failed to activate swap Swap Partition.
  See 'systemctl status dev-sda2.swap' for details.
  [FAILED] Failed to start Cryptography Setup for sda2_crypt.
  See 'systemctl status systemd-cryptsetup@sda2_crypt.service' for details.
  [DEPEND] Dependency failed for Encrypted Volumes.
   Starting Raise network interfaces...

  ---Logs---

  root@tuleta4u-lp7:~# systemctl status systemd-cryptsetup@sda2_crypt.service
  ? systemd-cryptsetup@sda2_crypt.service - Cryptography Setup for sda2_crypt
 Loaded: loaded (/etc/crypttab; generated; vendor preset: enabled)
 Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Mon 2017-01-02 01:58:14 EST; 1min 
57
   Docs: man:crypttab(5)
 man:systemd-cryptsetup-generator(8)
 man:systemd-cryptsetup@.service(8)
   Main PID: 2023 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)

  Jan 02 01:58:14 tuleta4u-lp7 systemd[1]: Starting Cryptography Setup for 
sda2_cr
  Jan 02 01:58:14 tuleta4u-lp7 mkswap[2057]: mkswap: error: 
/dev/mapper/sda2_crypt
  Jan 02 01:58:14 tuleta4u-lp7 systemd[1]: 
systemd-cryptsetup@sda2_crypt.service: 
  Jan 02 01:58:14 tuleta4u-lp7 systemd[1]: Failed to start Cryptography Setup 
for 
  Jan 02 01:58:14 tuleta4u-lp7 systemd[1]: 
systemd-cryptsetup@sda2_crypt.service: 
  Jan 02 01:58:14 tuleta4u-lp7 systemd[1]: 
systemd-cryptsetup@sda2_crypt.service: 

  
  root@tuleta4u-lp7:~# systemctl start systemd-cryptsetup@sda2_crypt.service
  Job for systemd-cryptsetup@sda2_crypt.service failed because the control 
process exited with error code.
  See "systemctl status systemd-cryptsetup@sda2_crypt.service" and "journalctl 
-xe" for details.

  root@tuleta4u-lp7:~# journalctl -xe
  -- The start-up result is done.
  Jan 02 03:17:01 tuleta4u-lp7 CRON[3955]: pam_unix(cron:session): session 
opened 
  Jan 02 03:17:01 tuleta4u-lp7 CRON[3956]: (root) CMD (   cd / && run-parts 
--repo
  Jan 02 03:17:01 tuleta4u-lp7 CRON[3955]: pam_unix(cron:session): session 
closed 
  Jan 02 03:37:57 tuleta4u-lp7 systemd[1]: Starting Cryptography Setup for 
sda2_cr
  -- Subject: Unit systemd-cryptsetup@sda2_crypt.service has begun start-up
  -- Defined-By: systemd
  -- Support: http://www.ubuntu.com/support
  -- 
  -- Unit systemd-cryptsetup@sda2_crypt.service has begun starting up.
  Jan 02 03:37:57 tuleta4u-lp7 systemd-cryptsetup[3960]: Volume sda2_crypt 
already
  Jan 02 03:37:57 tuleta4u-lp7 mkswap[3962]: mkswap: error: 
/dev/mapper/sda2_crypt
  Jan 02 03:37:57 tuleta4u-lp7 systemd[1]: 
systemd-cryptsetup@sda2_crypt.service: 
  Jan 02 03:37:57 tuleta4u-lp7 systemd[1]: Failed to start Cryptography Setup 
for 
  -- Subject: Unit systemd-cryptsetup@sda2_crypt.service has failed
  -- Defined-By: systemd
  -- Support: http://www.ubuntu.com/support
  -- 
  -- Unit systemd-cryptsetup@sda2_crypt.service has failed.
  -- 
  -- The result is failed.
  Jan 02 03:37:57 tuleta4u-lp7 systemd[1]: 
systemd-cryptsetup@sda2_crypt.service: 
  Jan 02 03:37:57 tuleta4u-lp7 systemd[1]: 
systemd-cryptsetup@sda2_crypt.service:

  root@tuleta4u-lp7:~# cat /etc/fstab
  # /etc/fstab: static file system information.
  #
  # Use 'blkid' to print the universally unique identifier for a
  # device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name devices
  # that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5).
  #
  #
  # / was on /dev/sda3 during installation
  UUID=44e6ba68-4cbb-4978-8d90-6077796b3715 /   xfs defaults
0   0

  root@tuleta4u-lp7:~# lsblk
  NAME   MAJ:MIN RM   SIZE RO TYPE  MOUNTPOINT
  sda  8:00   235G  0 disk  
  ??sda1   8:10 7M  0 part  
  ??sda2   8:2028G  0 part  
  ? ??sda2_crypt 253:0028G  0 crypt [SWAP]
  ??sda3   8:30 167.7G  0 part  /
  ??sda4   8:4028G  0 part  
  sdb  8:16   0   235G  0 disk  
  sr0 11:01 631.3M  0 rom   
  sr1 11:11 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1611010] Re: yakkety desktop - non-english installation crashes with /plugininstall.py: ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: ''

2016-08-23 Thread Adam Dingle
I believe this bug occurs in any location whose default language is non-
English, even if you select English as your language.  I saw it while
trying to install Yakkety in Spain, even though I selected English for
the language and keyboard.  As a workaround, I ran the installer again
and chose New York rather than Madrid when asked for my time zone.  Then
it worked fine.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611010

Title:
  yakkety desktop - non-english installation crashes with
  /plugininstall.py: ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10:
  ''

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubiquity package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  Enviroment: Ubuntu 16.10.5 Yakkety Yak http://cdimage.ubuntu.com
  /daily-live/current/

  HW: Toshiba portege Z30-A12T | Intel i5+intel graphics | SSD hd

  Preconditions: W10+Xenial xerus installed, internet connection, 3rd
  party sw and updates selected

  Steps to reproduce:

  1º Click something else on Installation type screen>select /dev/sdaX where 
Xenial is installed, use it to mount / and leave some space to create the /home 
partition(ext4)
  2º Then click back and select erase ubuntu 16.04.1 and install Yakkety
  3º Installation starts

  Current result: After a little time installing it crashes and a window
  shows up to let the user know that some info is being gathered to send
  it to developers, and finally firefox opens on the bug report web on
  ubiquity package

  Expected result: No crashes during installation

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10
  Package: ubiquity 16.10.5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-33.52-generic 4.4.15
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-33-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.3-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperVersion: 1.376
  Date: Mon Aug  8 15:50:56 2016
  InstallCmdLine: file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper 
initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash --- maybe-ubiquity
  LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 16.10 "Yakkety Yak" - Alpha amd64 (20160808)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=es_ES.UTF-8
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=es_ES.UTF-8
  SourcePackage: ubiquity
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1611010/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1190806] Re: X server fails to start on MacBookPro9, 1 with hybrid Intel/Nvidia graphics: no screens found

2016-03-08 Thread Adam Dingle
I'm no longer attempting to run Ubuntu on a MacBook, so I have no way to
test this right now.  Sorry!  We can just close this if you like.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1190806

Title:
  X server fails to start on MacBookPro9,1 with hybrid Intel/Nvidia
  graphics: no screens found

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  I have a MacBookPro9,1, which has both an integrated Intel HD Graphics
  4000 controller and a discrete Nvidia GeForce GT 650M.  I want to
  disable the Nvidia graphics and boot using Intel only, since I don't
  need the Nvidia chip's capabilities and it shortens battery life (and
  makes suspend/resume not work; see bug #1084960).  But when I
  blacklist the Nouveau driver and reboot using the Intel driver only,
  the X server fails to start: it reports "no screens found" and
  crashes.

  I'm booting using EFI rather than BIOS; not sure whether that's
  relevant.

  I'll attach the X server log and the dmesg log.  Just let me know if
  there's any other information I can provide.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1190806/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1423855] Re: Unity can't show the global menu item for some gnome apps

2015-03-05 Thread Adam Dingle
It's fantastic to see this fixed - this bug was a major problem.  Thanks
so much!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1423855

Title:
  Unity can't show the global menu item for some gnome apps

Status in Unity:
  Won't Fix
Status in indicator-appmenu package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unity package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  Unity can't show the global menu item for some gnome apps.

  For example, the 'terminal' menu for gnome-terminal, or the
  'calculator' menu for gnome-calculator cannot be opened.  Other menus
  can be displayed (file, edit,...)

  This is a recent regression I think.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04
  Package: unity 7.3.1+15.04.20150219.2-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.18.0-13.14-generic 3.18.5
  Uname: Linux 3.18.0-13-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.16.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Fri Feb 20 21:14:01 2015
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-01-31 (20 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.10 Utopic Unicorn - Release amd64 (20141022.1)
  SourcePackage: unity
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1423855/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1276186] Re: System becomes unresponsive, ibus-ui-daemon takes ~150 % cpu

2014-12-21 Thread Adam Dingle
I'm still seeing this behavior in Ubuntu 15.04 when typing in Geary
0.9.0.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ibus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1276186

Title:
  System becomes unresponsive, ibus-ui-daemon takes ~150 % cpu

Status in ibus package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  As stated the graphical desktop became unresponsive. Dropping to
  CTRL + ALT + F1 terminal and `top`showed ibus-ui-daemon taking around 150 % 
cpu time and ibus-ui-gtk3 taking around 50 % cpu time.

  (names may contain minor errors)

  Tried to kill processes, rebooted.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
  Package: ibus 1.5.3-6ubuntu2.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-15.25-generic 3.11.10
  Uname: Linux 3.11.0-15-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: wl
  ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Tue Feb  4 16:41:03 2014
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-09-10 (147 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Release amd64 (20130424)
  MarkForUpload: True
  SourcePackage: ibus
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-23 (104 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibus/+bug/1276186/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1404702] [NEW] selected radio button is not visible in WebKit 2.6 in Ambiance

2014-12-21 Thread Adam Dingle
Public bug reported:

I'm running WebKit 2.6.2 on Ubuntu 15.04 (Vivid).

With this version of WebKit, a selected radio button looks exactly like
an unselected radio button in the Ambiance theme.  You can see this, for
example, if you run Epiphany and visit
http://www.w3schools.com/HTML/tryit.asp?filename=tryhtml_radio, or any
other web page with radio buttons.

** Affects: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: ubuntu-themes (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: ubuntu-themes (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-themes in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404702

Title:
  selected radio button is not visible in WebKit 2.6 in Ambiance

Status in epiphany-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in ubuntu-themes package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in webkit2gtk package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I'm running WebKit 2.6.2 on Ubuntu 15.04 (Vivid).

  With this version of WebKit, a selected radio button looks exactly
  like an unselected radio button in the Ambiance theme.  You can see
  this, for example, if you run Epiphany and visit
  http://www.w3schools.com/HTML/tryit.asp?filename=tryhtml_radio, or any
  other web page with radio buttons.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/epiphany-browser/+bug/1404702/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1276186] Re: System becomes unresponsive, ibus-ui-daemon takes ~150 % cpu

2014-10-24 Thread Adam Dingle
I see this problem when I run Geary 0.8 on Ubuntu 14.10.  I've had to
disable IBus as a workaround.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ibus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1276186

Title:
  System becomes unresponsive, ibus-ui-daemon takes ~150 % cpu

Status in “ibus” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  As stated the graphical desktop became unresponsive. Dropping to
  CTRL + ALT + F1 terminal and `top`showed ibus-ui-daemon taking around 150 % 
cpu time and ibus-ui-gtk3 taking around 50 % cpu time.

  (names may contain minor errors)

  Tried to kill processes, rebooted.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
  Package: ibus 1.5.3-6ubuntu2.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-15.25-generic 3.11.10
  Uname: Linux 3.11.0-15-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: wl
  ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Tue Feb  4 16:41:03 2014
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-09-10 (147 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Release amd64 (20130424)
  MarkForUpload: True
  SourcePackage: ibus
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-23 (104 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibus/+bug/1276186/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp