[Touch-packages] [Bug 1626651] Re: brightness keys are handled slower in Yakkety than Xenial

2016-10-04 Thread Eduards Bezverhijs
In contrast this is what is happening with Xenial, which works perfectly.
evtest:
Event: time 1475641421.193234, type 1 (EV_KEY), code 225 (KEY_BRIGHTNESSUP), 
value 1
Event: time 1475641421.193234, -- SYN_REPORT 
Event: time 1475641421.193306, type 1 (EV_KEY), code 225 (KEY_BRIGHTNESSUP), 
value 0
Event: time 1475641421.193306, -- SYN_REPORT 

udev monitoring in the attachment.

** Attachment added: "udev.xenial.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-settings-daemon/+bug/1626651/+attachment/4754687/+files/udev.xenial.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626651

Title:
  brightness keys are handled slower in Yakkety than Xenial

Status in policykit-1 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in unity-settings-daemon package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  I've noticed on Lenovo X220 and X230 laptops that pressing brightness
  keys on Yakkety seems less responsive and slower than Xenial.  I ran
  forkstat on Xenial and just observed udev being forked off:

  Xenial:
  $ sudo forkstat
  Time Event  PID  Info  Duration Process
  17:37:35 fork273 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  17:37:35 fork   1977 child   /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  17:37:35 exit   1977  00.008 /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd

  Whereas on Yakkety, there is far more activity:
  Time Event  PID  Info  Duration Process
  16:35:34 fork   2626 parent  update-notifier
  16:35:34 fork   2645 child   update-notifier
  16:35:34 exec   2645 /usr/bin/python3 
/usr/share/apport/apport-checkreports
  16:35:34 exit   26452560.221 /usr/bin/python3 
/usr/share/apport/apport-checkreports
  16:35:34 fork   2626 parent  update-notifier
  16:35:34 fork   2646 child   update-notifier
  16:35:34 exec   2646 /usr/bin/python3 
/usr/share/apport/apport-checkreports --system
  16:35:34 exit   26462560.188 /usr/bin/python3 
/usr/share/apport/apport-checkreports --system
  16:35:36 fork   1576 parent  
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 fork   2647 child   
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 exec   2647 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-max-brightness
  16:35:36 exit   2647  00.008 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-max-brightness
  16:35:36 fork   1576 parent  
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 fork   2648 child   
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 exec   2648 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-brightness
  16:35:36 exit   2648  00.006 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-brightness
  16:35:36 fork   1576 parent  
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 fork   2649 child   
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 exec   2649 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-brightness
  16:35:36 exit   2649  00.007 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-brightness
  16:35:36 fork   1576 parent  
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 fork   2650 child   
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 exec   2650 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-max-brightness
  16:35:36 exit   2650  00.006 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-max-brightness
  16:35:36 fork   1576 parent  
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 fork   2651 child   
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 exec   2651 pkexec 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --set-brightness 2250
  16:35:36 clone  2651 parent  pkexec 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --set-brightness 2250
  16:35:36 clone  2652 thread  pkexec 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --set-brightness 2250
  16:35:36 clone  2651 parent  pkexec 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --set-brightness 2250
  16:35:36 clone  2653 thread  pkexec 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --set-brightness 2250
  16:35:36 fork  1 parent  /sbin/init splash
  16:35:36 fork   2654 child   /sbin/init splash
  Time Event  PID  Info  Duration Process
  16:35:36 fork233 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork   2655 child   /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork233 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork   2656 child   

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1626651] Re: brightness keys are handled slower in Yakkety than Xenial

2016-10-04 Thread Eduards Bezverhijs
** Attachment added: "evdtest.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-settings-daemon/+bug/1626651/+attachment/4754481/+files/evdtest.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626651

Title:
  brightness keys are handled slower in Yakkety than Xenial

Status in policykit-1 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in unity-settings-daemon package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  I've noticed on Lenovo X220 and X230 laptops that pressing brightness
  keys on Yakkety seems less responsive and slower than Xenial.  I ran
  forkstat on Xenial and just observed udev being forked off:

  Xenial:
  $ sudo forkstat
  Time Event  PID  Info  Duration Process
  17:37:35 fork273 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  17:37:35 fork   1977 child   /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  17:37:35 exit   1977  00.008 /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd

  Whereas on Yakkety, there is far more activity:
  Time Event  PID  Info  Duration Process
  16:35:34 fork   2626 parent  update-notifier
  16:35:34 fork   2645 child   update-notifier
  16:35:34 exec   2645 /usr/bin/python3 
/usr/share/apport/apport-checkreports
  16:35:34 exit   26452560.221 /usr/bin/python3 
/usr/share/apport/apport-checkreports
  16:35:34 fork   2626 parent  update-notifier
  16:35:34 fork   2646 child   update-notifier
  16:35:34 exec   2646 /usr/bin/python3 
/usr/share/apport/apport-checkreports --system
  16:35:34 exit   26462560.188 /usr/bin/python3 
/usr/share/apport/apport-checkreports --system
  16:35:36 fork   1576 parent  
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 fork   2647 child   
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 exec   2647 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-max-brightness
  16:35:36 exit   2647  00.008 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-max-brightness
  16:35:36 fork   1576 parent  
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 fork   2648 child   
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 exec   2648 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-brightness
  16:35:36 exit   2648  00.006 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-brightness
  16:35:36 fork   1576 parent  
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 fork   2649 child   
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 exec   2649 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-brightness
  16:35:36 exit   2649  00.007 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-brightness
  16:35:36 fork   1576 parent  
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 fork   2650 child   
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 exec   2650 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-max-brightness
  16:35:36 exit   2650  00.006 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-max-brightness
  16:35:36 fork   1576 parent  
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 fork   2651 child   
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 exec   2651 pkexec 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --set-brightness 2250
  16:35:36 clone  2651 parent  pkexec 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --set-brightness 2250
  16:35:36 clone  2652 thread  pkexec 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --set-brightness 2250
  16:35:36 clone  2651 parent  pkexec 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --set-brightness 2250
  16:35:36 clone  2653 thread  pkexec 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --set-brightness 2250
  16:35:36 fork  1 parent  /sbin/init splash
  16:35:36 fork   2654 child   /sbin/init splash
  Time Event  PID  Info  Duration Process
  16:35:36 fork233 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork   2655 child   /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork233 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork   2656 child   /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork233 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork   2657 child   /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork233 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork   2658 child   /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork233 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork   2659 child   /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 exit   2659   

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1626651] Re: brightness keys are handled slower in Yakkety than Xenial

2016-10-04 Thread Eduards Bezverhijs
I have similar problem on Dell XPS 15 (l521x). It is not quick and it seems 
that for every key-press it's trying to change brightness twice.
I'll attach evtest and udev monitor outputs.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626651

Title:
  brightness keys are handled slower in Yakkety than Xenial

Status in policykit-1 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in unity-settings-daemon package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  I've noticed on Lenovo X220 and X230 laptops that pressing brightness
  keys on Yakkety seems less responsive and slower than Xenial.  I ran
  forkstat on Xenial and just observed udev being forked off:

  Xenial:
  $ sudo forkstat
  Time Event  PID  Info  Duration Process
  17:37:35 fork273 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  17:37:35 fork   1977 child   /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  17:37:35 exit   1977  00.008 /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd

  Whereas on Yakkety, there is far more activity:
  Time Event  PID  Info  Duration Process
  16:35:34 fork   2626 parent  update-notifier
  16:35:34 fork   2645 child   update-notifier
  16:35:34 exec   2645 /usr/bin/python3 
/usr/share/apport/apport-checkreports
  16:35:34 exit   26452560.221 /usr/bin/python3 
/usr/share/apport/apport-checkreports
  16:35:34 fork   2626 parent  update-notifier
  16:35:34 fork   2646 child   update-notifier
  16:35:34 exec   2646 /usr/bin/python3 
/usr/share/apport/apport-checkreports --system
  16:35:34 exit   26462560.188 /usr/bin/python3 
/usr/share/apport/apport-checkreports --system
  16:35:36 fork   1576 parent  
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 fork   2647 child   
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 exec   2647 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-max-brightness
  16:35:36 exit   2647  00.008 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-max-brightness
  16:35:36 fork   1576 parent  
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 fork   2648 child   
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 exec   2648 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-brightness
  16:35:36 exit   2648  00.006 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-brightness
  16:35:36 fork   1576 parent  
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 fork   2649 child   
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 exec   2649 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-brightness
  16:35:36 exit   2649  00.007 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-brightness
  16:35:36 fork   1576 parent  
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 fork   2650 child   
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 exec   2650 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-max-brightness
  16:35:36 exit   2650  00.006 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-max-brightness
  16:35:36 fork   1576 parent  
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 fork   2651 child   
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 exec   2651 pkexec 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --set-brightness 2250
  16:35:36 clone  2651 parent  pkexec 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --set-brightness 2250
  16:35:36 clone  2652 thread  pkexec 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --set-brightness 2250
  16:35:36 clone  2651 parent  pkexec 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --set-brightness 2250
  16:35:36 clone  2653 thread  pkexec 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --set-brightness 2250
  16:35:36 fork  1 parent  /sbin/init splash
  16:35:36 fork   2654 child   /sbin/init splash
  Time Event  PID  Info  Duration Process
  16:35:36 fork233 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork   2655 child   /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork233 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork   2656 child   /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork233 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork   2657 child   /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork233 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork   2658 child   /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork233 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork   2659 child   

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1626651] Re: brightness keys are handled slower in Yakkety than Xenial

2016-10-04 Thread Eduards Bezverhijs
** Attachment added: "udev.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-settings-daemon/+bug/1626651/+attachment/4754480/+files/udev.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626651

Title:
  brightness keys are handled slower in Yakkety than Xenial

Status in policykit-1 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in unity-settings-daemon package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  I've noticed on Lenovo X220 and X230 laptops that pressing brightness
  keys on Yakkety seems less responsive and slower than Xenial.  I ran
  forkstat on Xenial and just observed udev being forked off:

  Xenial:
  $ sudo forkstat
  Time Event  PID  Info  Duration Process
  17:37:35 fork273 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  17:37:35 fork   1977 child   /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  17:37:35 exit   1977  00.008 /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd

  Whereas on Yakkety, there is far more activity:
  Time Event  PID  Info  Duration Process
  16:35:34 fork   2626 parent  update-notifier
  16:35:34 fork   2645 child   update-notifier
  16:35:34 exec   2645 /usr/bin/python3 
/usr/share/apport/apport-checkreports
  16:35:34 exit   26452560.221 /usr/bin/python3 
/usr/share/apport/apport-checkreports
  16:35:34 fork   2626 parent  update-notifier
  16:35:34 fork   2646 child   update-notifier
  16:35:34 exec   2646 /usr/bin/python3 
/usr/share/apport/apport-checkreports --system
  16:35:34 exit   26462560.188 /usr/bin/python3 
/usr/share/apport/apport-checkreports --system
  16:35:36 fork   1576 parent  
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 fork   2647 child   
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 exec   2647 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-max-brightness
  16:35:36 exit   2647  00.008 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-max-brightness
  16:35:36 fork   1576 parent  
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 fork   2648 child   
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 exec   2648 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-brightness
  16:35:36 exit   2648  00.006 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-brightness
  16:35:36 fork   1576 parent  
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 fork   2649 child   
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 exec   2649 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-brightness
  16:35:36 exit   2649  00.007 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-brightness
  16:35:36 fork   1576 parent  
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 fork   2650 child   
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 exec   2650 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-max-brightness
  16:35:36 exit   2650  00.006 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --get-max-brightness
  16:35:36 fork   1576 parent  
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 fork   2651 child   
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
  16:35:36 exec   2651 pkexec 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --set-brightness 2250
  16:35:36 clone  2651 parent  pkexec 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --set-brightness 2250
  16:35:36 clone  2652 thread  pkexec 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --set-brightness 2250
  16:35:36 clone  2651 parent  pkexec 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --set-brightness 2250
  16:35:36 clone  2653 thread  pkexec 
/usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/usd-backlight-helper --set-brightness 2250
  16:35:36 fork  1 parent  /sbin/init splash
  16:35:36 fork   2654 child   /sbin/init splash
  Time Event  PID  Info  Duration Process
  16:35:36 fork233 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork   2655 child   /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork233 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork   2656 child   /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork233 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork   2657 child   /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork233 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork   2658 child   /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork233 parent  /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 fork   2659 child   /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
  16:35:36 exit   2659  0  

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1539513] Re: networkmanager segfaults with 3.2.21-1ubuntu1

2016-01-30 Thread Eduards Bezverhijs
Guys, this definately needs a fix, imagine single computer at home +
ordinary user (not advanced users like us) = no way of fixing this at
all.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libnl3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539513

Title:
  networkmanager segfaults with 3.2.21-1ubuntu1

Status in libnl3 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Description:Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS
  Release:14.04

  After upgrading to 3.2.21-1ubuntu1 network-manager 0.9.8.8-0ubuntu7.2 
segfaults:
  [   21.367977] init: network-manager main process (1000) killed by SEGV signal
  [   21.367989] init: network-manager main process ended, respawning
  [   21.424932] init: network-manager main process (1060) killed by SEGV signal
  [   21.424943] init: network-manager main process ended, respawning
  [   21.451519] init: network-manager main process (1066) killed by SEGV signal
  [...]

  xxx@yyy:/tmp/bla# gdb /usr/sbin/NetworkManager CoreDump
  [...]
  Reading symbols from /usr/sbin/NetworkManager...(no debugging symbols 
found)...done.
  [New LWP 3550]
  [New LWP 3551]
  [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
  Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
  Core was generated by `NetworkManager'.
  Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
  #0  0x00469fee in nm_netlink_monitor_attach ()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnl3/+bug/1539513/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1448555] Re: network-manager does not autoconnect to wifi network after resume from suspend

2015-06-12 Thread Eduards Bezverhijs
I'm having kinda the same problem. After suspend at work and resume after one 
hour at home, NM applet won't show my home networks at all - so no auto 
connection, of course.
If I do enable/disable wifi or try to connect to one of work wifi AP (which of 
course is not there but is still in the list in NM applet), then NM applet 
refreshes AP list and I'm able to connect.
I have nothing suspicios in pm-suspend log though.
It might be nm-applet issue maybe...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1448555

Title:
  network-manager does not autoconnect to wifi network after resume from
  suspend

Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  After upgrading to 15.04 network manager does not reconnect to the
  wifi network after resuming from a suspend to memory.

  Workaround:
  disable and re-enable wireless network - connects immediately

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04
  Package: network-manager 0.9.10.0-4ubuntu15
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-15.15-generic 3.19.3
  Uname: Linux 3.19.0-15-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia wl
  ApportVersion: 2.17.2-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Sat Apr 25 23:53:54 2015
  IfupdownConfig:
   # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
   auto lo
   iface lo inet loopback
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-05-17 (708 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Release amd64+mac 
(20130424)
  IpRoute:
   default via 10.1.0.254 dev wlan0  proto static  metric 1024 
   10.0.0.0/8 dev wlan0  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.1.0.103 
   169.254.0.0/16 dev wlan0  scope link  metric 1000
  NetworkManager.state:
   [main]
   NetworkingEnabled=true
   WirelessEnabled=true
   WWANEnabled=true
   WimaxEnabled=true
  SourcePackage: network-manager
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to vivid on 2015-04-25 (0 days ago)
  nmcli-dev:
   DEVICE TYPE  STATE DBUS-PATH 
 CONNECTION  CON-UUID  CON-PATH 
  
   wlan0  wifi  connected 
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/1  rsb_hs  
d8793959-2da1-4dc6-85ad-2dcf9e36e64b  
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/1 
   EC:88:92:61:E9:5F  btdisconnected  
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/2  --  --   
 -- 
   lo loopback  unmanaged 
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/0  --  --   
 --
  nmcli-nm: Error: command ['nmcli', '-f', 'all', 'nm'] failed with exit code 
2: Error: Object 'nm' is unknown, try 'nmcli help'.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1448555/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1426851] Re: Power button shuts down computer if a Qt application is running

2015-05-21 Thread Eduards Bezverhijs
The same behavior on 14.04 and 15.04 - if QT app is open, all windows
for it are closed, like Keepassx, skype, WPS office asks whether to save
the contents of documents (this kinda seems like pressing Alt+F4).

14.10, which was troublesome to use for me so I don't use it,  didn't
have this problem.

I'm running Dell, XPS 15 L521X model, can't verify on any other
computer.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to qtbase-opensource-src in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1426851

Title:
  Power button shuts down computer if a Qt application is running

Status in qtbase-opensource-src package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  On Ubuntu 14.04, the usual behavior of the power button is bringing a
  dialog with options (Lock, Suspend, Restart, Shutdown) and waiting for
  the user's choice.

  When a Qt application is running, for instance Qt Creator or Texmaker,
  (but not VLC, Clementine or Skype) and the power button is pressed, it
  instantly closes that Qt app (http://qt-
  project.org/forums/viewthread/47632/), brings the shut down dialog and
  then shuts down the computer without waiting for the user’s choice.

  I first asked about this on this forum: 
http://qt-project.org/forums/viewthread/53243/#222409
  and reported it at Qt Creator, thinking it was the only application causing 
it, where they told me to report it to Canonical: 
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTCREATORBUG-14030

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-src/+bug/1426851/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1451032] Re: keyscript option in crypttab ignored

2015-05-02 Thread Eduards Bezverhijs
I was just experimenting with this and about to create a bug, but
someone already did, very good :)

I set up some home brew logging and it seems passdev is never called,
instead systemd is waiting for device which is specified as source for
the key, second option in crypttab.

When I boot up using upstart, then all is fine and device gets unlocked.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1451032

Title:
  keyscript option in crypttab ignored

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in systemd package in Debian:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  The setup for unlocking an encrypted volume during boot using (only) a
  keyfile (on a detachable USB drive) usually calls for a keyscript to
  be specified as one of the encrypted volume's options. But with
  systemd, such encrypted volumes can only be unlocked during boot by
  typing in a passphrase.

  Steps to reproduce:
  1. Have a LUKS encrypted volume.
  2. Have said volume specified in /etc/crypttab, with keyscript= option 
pointing to your script for outputting the unlocking key.
  3. Boot.

  What I expect to happen:
  To have the volume unlocked by the script at boot time without manual 
intervention.

  What happens instead:
  Plymouth shows a prompt to enter a valid passphrase for the volume.

  Workarounds:
  Apparently the options for unlocking encrypted drives, including keyscript, 
can also be specified at the kernel command-line, without crypttab, and 
according to yaantc at Hacker News [1] this can be used to work around the 
issue. I haven't personally tried this.

  * [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8477913

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04
  Package: systemd 219-7ubuntu4
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-15.15-generic 3.19.3
  Uname: Linux 3.19.0-15-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.17.2-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Sat May  2 15:39:07 2015
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-10-18 (196 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.10 Utopic Unicorn - Alpha amd64 (20140923)
  MachineType: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. UX32A
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.19.0-15-generic.efi.signed 
root=UUID=2185885c-b860-49a8-973f-fa3b52d3eecf ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: systemd
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to vivid on 2015-04-23 (8 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 01/29/2013
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: UX32A.214
  dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567
  dmi.board.name: UX32A
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.board.version: 1.0
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.chassis.version: 1.0
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrUX32A.214:bd01/29/2013:svnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:pnUX32A:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnUX32A:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:ct10:cvr1.0:
  dmi.product.name: UX32A
  dmi.product.version: 1.0
  dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1451032/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1387558] Re: Compiz slows down over time (usually one day is enough)

2015-02-09 Thread Eduards Bezverhijs
Hi, recently I tried installing 14.10 on the same machine on different 
partition and it seems that problem with rotation + slowdown is gone.
So as a next step was upgrading my trusty Trysty to Utopic. Right after upgrade 
(and before login) I deleted monitors.xml file from my working profile (user) 
and viola problem is gone.
So gar so good, I would like to say. So the problem was related to monitors.xml 
or updates between my last try and this one, or both.
Can't say whether slowdown is gone as I'm using the system for just about one 
day.
Will report back with the results.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387558

Title:
  Compiz slows down over time (usually one day is enough)

Status in Compiz:
  Incomplete
Status in Unity:
  Incomplete
Status in unity package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  I have had this problem for quite a long time tbh. And after each release I 
hope it will be fixed, but it doesn't happen.
  A little intro: I'm using Ubuntu for work, I rarely shutdown the computer I 
rather put it to sleep mode, in worst case it's hibernate. I have loads of apps 
opened at the same time. I use external monitor as well. Computer is Dell XPS15 
L521X, 16Gb RAM, 120GB SSD + 1TB HDD. As a graphics card I'm using builtin 
intel HD4000, I have GF GT640 as well but it's disabled using bbswitch.

  Symptoms are that after some time compiz slows down a lot while using
  it. Usually it's no more than 2 days and it's slow again. When I
  restart Unity (setsid unity) it's back to full buttersmooth speed with
  the same apps opened which leads to conclusion that compiz can handle
  the load very well. Maybe it's mesa, maybe it's compiz or unity itself
  that slows it down - but I'm no pro to tell.

  With 14.10 release I observed very interesting behaviour. I have FHD
  builtin monitor and FHD external monitor rotated counterclockwise.
  Let's say I started computer yesterday in the morning, it was working
  smooth with both monitors and single display, I suspended computer got
  home unsuspended and it seemed sluggish (only graphics part of
  course). I ran glxgears (I know I know...) and it showed ~ 50FPS which
  is slow, because running the same before suspend gives near 60FPS
  (refresh rate). Now I come back to work and run it on single builtin
  display - ~ 50 FPS, I connect second FHD dispplay and FPS are back to
  60 and it's running buttersmooth again. So it seems that
  mesa/compiz/unity have some strange refresh rate problem detection
  maybe... 2 FHD displays seems to be twice the job compiz has to do
  over single display which is strangely slower...

  Please advise how can I help solving this, do I need to run compiz
  debug version or what can I exactly help technically (applying a
  patch, compiling compiz myself, you name it...). I know the standard
  procedure of logs etc., I'm afraid that won't help much in this
  situation. I looked at logs and there's nothing suspicious, at least
  to me.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/1387558/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp