[Touch-packages] [Bug 1453041] Re: SettingsDb should check file timestamps instead of using inotify watch
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity-scopes-api in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453041 Title: SettingsDb should check file timestamps instead of using inotify watch Status in unity-scopes-api package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: SettingsDb could be greatly simplified by using ctime/mtime of the settings file, rather than a watcher thread and inotify watch. The only place where we care if settings file has changes is settings() getter and this is where we can just check ctime/mtime to detect changes and re-parse. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-scopes-api/+bug/1453041/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1453041] Re: SettingsDb should check file timestamps instead of using inotify watch
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity-scopes-api in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453041 Title: SettingsDb should check file timestamps instead of using inotify watch Status in unity-scopes-api package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Bug description: SettingsDb could be greatly simplified by using ctime/mtime of the settings file, rather than a watcher thread and inotify watch. The only place where we care if settings file has changes is settings() getter and this is where we can just check ctime/mtime to detect changes and re-parse. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-scopes-api/+bug/1453041/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1453041] Re: SettingsDb should check file timestamps instead of using inotify watch
** Branch linked: lp:~stolowski/unity-scopes-api/settingsdb-use- timestamp ** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Pawel Stolowski (stolowski) ** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity-scopes-api in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453041 Title: SettingsDb should check file timestamps instead of using inotify watch Status in unity-scopes-api package in Ubuntu: In Progress Bug description: SettingsDb could be greatly simplified by using ctime/mtime of the settings file, rather than a watcher thread and inotify watch. The only place where we care if settings file has changes is settings() getter and this is where we can just check ctime/mtime to detect changes and re-parse. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-scopes-api/+bug/1453041/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1453041] Re: SettingsDb should check file timestamps instead of using inotify watch
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist = Undecided -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity-scopes-api in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453041 Title: SettingsDb should check file timestamps instead of using inotify watch Status in unity-scopes-api package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: SettingsDb could be greatly simplified by using ctime/mtime of the settings file, rather than a watcher thread and inotify watch. The only place where we care if settings file has changes is settings() getter and this is where we can just check ctime/mtime to detect changes and re-parse. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-scopes-api/+bug/1453041/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1453041] Re: SettingsDb should check file timestamps instead of using inotify watch
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu) Importance: High = Medium ** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium = Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity-scopes-api in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453041 Title: SettingsDb should check file timestamps instead of using inotify watch Status in unity-scopes-api package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: SettingsDb could be greatly simplified by using ctime/mtime of the settings file, rather than a watcher thread and inotify watch. The only place where we care if settings file has changes is settings() getter and this is where we can just check ctime/mtime to detect changes and re-parse. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-scopes-api/+bug/1453041/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1453041] Re: SettingsDb should check file timestamps instead of using inotify watch
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity-scopes-api in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453041 Title: SettingsDb should check file timestamps instead of using inotify watch Status in unity-scopes-api package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: SettingsDb could be greatly simplified by using ctime/mtime of the settings file, rather than a watcher thread and inotify watch. The only place where we care if settings file has changes is settings() getter and this is where we can just check ctime/mtime to detect changes and re-parse. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-scopes-api/+bug/1453041/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
